CORUPROC is not doing "Actual-Cost Calculation" - still in CO1P.

Hello friends,
As per SAP documentation, and many SCN posts I went through - all of them said CORUPROC is the program to run as batch job, and CO1P is its equivalent online transaction.  In my quality system, I see CORUPROC is not doing the "Actual-Cost Calculation" - and even if I execute CORUPROC online (through SE38), it is not clearing them. (It is clearing the goods movement entries).  CO1P still shows all the order/operation awaiting actual cost calculations.  If I select them in CO1P, and click <save>, they are cleared.
So can someone guide me how can I make CORUPROC to do the actual cost calculation please.
Thanks,
- Chetan

Hi
I would expect to have this record processed by report CORUPROC.
It's quite easy to analyze this program in debug. Set a break-point on the line below:
IF NOT g_costs IS INITIAL
Now follow the program execution until function module CO_RB_POST_ACTUAL_COSTS is called. If the function module is called, check if it was executed correctly reading the value of variable SY-SUBRC.
BR
Caetano

Similar Messages

  • Errors arose during actual cost calculation

    Errors arose during actual cost calculation
    No prices could be determinedfor object activitytype company code xxxx , cost center XXXX, activity type XXXX
    Pls let me know immediately friends deperate,
    regards,
    sri

    Hi
    when you gone to the transaction code Kp26 Activity typ price/ planning after give the input press period screen or F6 function key and check what price was maintained for your period 12.
    And even you do one thing go to the transaction code KS02 or 03. Give the cost center and press enter . Then from the meny bar select Environment -> whereused list->.
    And let me confirm how you run the cost estimate for the material
    bye

  • Actual cost calculation process

    Hi, All!
    I run the Actual Cost Calculation Process and created IPV is effecting PMAC, but no lines are created in gmf_invoice_distributions.

    Hi,
    Check the unit price of the PO and the Price for the line during AP Invoice matching. If there is a difference then it automatically goes into IPV. Also check the values for profile GMF: Include Invoices in Actual Cost.
    Regards,
    Malcolm

  • Actual Cost Calculation in Process Order

    Hi All,
    I updated Standard cost of a raw material through a cost estimate and also ran cost estimate of the FIN that is using this raw material but when I am creating a Process order, it is taking the cost of this particular raw material from the previous estimate not the recent one to calculate the target cost. Can any body help me with this.
    Thanks
    MKR

    Hi Ashok,
    My Valuation variants for the Costing Variant of Cost Estimate and Production order (Actual/Plan) cost calculation are in Sync to get the prices according to the price indicator in material master. But when it calculates cost for a production order, it is picking up cost from the previous period for that particular raw material. I have updated the standard cost by running the cost estimate but still its not working.
    Any lead on this. This will be really appreciated.
    Thanks
    MKR

  • Not displaying Actual cost Line Items for Order

    Hi Gurus,
    Recently we did patching from SPC6 to SPC8. After patching we noticed that could not able to see displaying Actual cost Line Items for Order from work order.
    System is not throughing error message when I double cline on line item at Plan/Actual Comparison screen in work order cost tab.
    We can able to see the same from KB01 with out any problem. I have attached the details.
    Could any one suggest me please. Appreciate your thoughts
    Regards,
    Srini

    Hi Paul,
    I have implemented this note and get it sorted out.
    Thank you for support.
    Regards,
    Srini

  • COFC - Actual cost calculation error

    Hi Friends,
    I am a PP consultant and i have a issue with cost calculation at the time of confirmation.
    There are production orders that were confirmed in year 2010 and year 2011. For year 2010 costing documents were created but not no costing docuemnts for confirmations in year 2011.
    I checked tcode COFC and found error log as : A master record for 1111/ABCD exists only in 2010.(where 1111 is cost center and ABCD is activity type.)
    I have checked the validaty of both cost center and activity type & both are valid.
    can anyone please suggest what has to be maintained for year 2011 from controlling side.
    Thanks In Advance.
    Rohit

    Hi Rohit,
    The similar error i have faced  just couple of hours back.
    I have checked up the plan prices in KP26 for the activity type and could see that they were not maintained for 2011.
    I have maintained the same for the current year and the error got resolved.
    Pls see that you are choosing the correct cost centre and activity type combination alongwith the costing version for 2011.
    Regards
    Sachin

  • Actual cost calculation

    Dear All
    How can i find the actual cost in subcontrating cycle for my consumed materials
    Regards

    Hi,
    if you use the sub con cycle for your procurement ( external procurement) , the components costs will be taken from the material master for account postings,Hence normally the cost of that material multiplied by the qty will be your cost of consumption.The respective GL account data which has been posted out during the GR of the finshed product ( componets will be posted for consumption)  will give the neccessary info.
    If it is a internal procurement respective order will tell the story of costs.
    Regards,

  • CO11N:ERROR AROSE DURING ACTUAL COST CALCULATION DO YOU WANT TO SEE THE ERR

    Dear Colleagues,
    Users are getting this error on CO11N when trying to post a confirmation for certain materials/orders.I searched this error on a few forums and can not find a lot of info...could you please point me to the right direction as to how I need to start troubleshootig this?
    I checked OPK4 configuration and can't see anything regarding cost over there...
    All help is appreciated,
    PAPJ1

    Hi Vivek,thanks for your reply.I got the details of the error as this:
    A master record for 360_221/LABOUR exists only in 2011
    Message no. KL002
    Diagnosis
    You want to use cost center 360_221 together with activity type LABOUR. For this combination, however, only one master data record was created in fiscal year 2011. The master record is defined in CCA during activity type planning.
    Procedure
    1. Create the master data record.
    Activity type planning
    2. Or, check your entries.
    Is it the within the cost centre master data that i need to do anything?
    I checked KS02/03 but can't see any activity such as LABOUR?is this for my Finance department I take it?

  • Rework Production Order not able to confirm and no cost calculation

    Hi Guys,
    During rework production order confirmation system giving error message as below:
    [Item category 01001 not allowed in accounting transaction 0000/0001
    Message no. GLT2001
    Diagnosis
    The online document splitting is active in your system. Here, each document is assigned to a accounting transaction variant and each document row to an item category. You determine for each business transaction variant which item categories can or must be posted here.
    The following error occurred for the document you entered:
    Item category 01001 in accounting transaction 0000, variant 0001 is no allowed.
    System Response
    The document cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Check the document entered, the derivation of the business transaction variant, the derivation of the item category, and the assignment of the item categories to the business transaction variant.
    Procedure for System Administration]
    This error relating to New G/L split functionality such as the document type and G/L accounts document type. Doc type is using as same as normal production order and normal production order confirmations and other activities are posted successfully. Iu2019m in a puzzle, regards to this behavior of rework order?
    Back ground for rework order:
    Rework order was created through trigger points.
    Rework order doesn't have any material, it has to pick and settle to original production order; the same was defined at re-work order settlement.
    Rework order not doing any cost calculations at production order level itu2019s giving a message as below:
    Object was not costed
    Message no. CK060
    Diagnosis
    The system could not find any entries that are relevant to costing.
    System Response
    The system did not cost the object.
    Procedure
    Check whether the following objects should be flagged as relevant to costing:
    - Items in the BOM
    - Display BOM
    - Operations in the routing
    - Control key in the routing
    1.  Look at the message log.
    2.  Check whether a quantity was specified in the confirmation.
    Will some one throw some light to come out from this situation and what I missed out and what need to be maintained exactly Plz.
    Thanks in advanceu2026Vyas

    Hi Mangalraj,
    Have check the BOM & Routing for Parent production order costing check box is for both. Coming to rework order doesn't have any material, though it has pulled the some material cost from parent production order. The same can see at production order costs>analysis, but where as costs>itemization not able to see and mesage issued like: object was not costed.
    as early mentioned, confirmation level same error.
    Hope this may give some idea on this case, thanks for your time on this.
    Looking forward some light.
    Thanks...Vyas

  • OPM Actual Costing (PMAC) not including AP Invoice transactions

    Hi,
    OPM Actual Costing (PMAC) not including AP Invoice transactions in 12.1.3 version. We have set profile GMF:Include Receipts in Actual Cost = 0, GMF:Include Invoices in Actual Cost = 1 still AP Invoice not included in OPM Actual costing.
    Observed, Invoices which has IPV are shown as in Actual transaction view with line source as "Invoice Price Variance". I was looking for a line source with "AP invoice" and "IPV"(if exisits) in Actual transaction view screen.
    Thanks,
    Solomon.

    Hi,
    did you run the extract AP charges request ?
    thanks .
    Ahmad.

  • How to avoid actual cost error log while confirm production order activity

    Hi
    I dont want to post actual activity cost via production order activity confirmation. But i want standard value keys for my production duration purpose. So,i defined activites(strd value key) in work center without assigning cost center to that work center. While i confirm in CO11N, system throws erro log as Actual cost calculation contain errors and allows me to confirm the activities. I am doing MB31 and all CO settlement activities also. But when i try to close the order it says error log exists,so closing of order is not possible. How to overcome this problem as i dont want to capture any cost of activites via production order,but i want confirmation only for production analysis.

    Hi
    Issue is resolved thru PP forum. Thanks for ur reply.
    Solution lies in Control key of routing and BOM costing relevancy.

  • (project system) do book confirmation amount as a actual cost

    HI all
    it is possible in project system when i confirm my activity then it does not book actual cost to my network activity.
    because i need to show this confirm amount as  only for information purpose....my clint requirement.
    thanks

    with the material ledger, actual costs are not only used to value the stock at the period end. You also have the possibility to revalue the cost of goods sold with the actual costs of production for the period.
    The system takes initial stock, initial value, production of the period, actual costs of production of the period to calculate "cumulative stock of the period" and "cumulative value". The cumulative value per unit is then applied to all consumption of the period (goods sold) and the final stock.
    Your only alternative to the material ledger would be to value yout finished goods at V-price, not S-price. The problem with this is that you don't necessarily have all the information about actual costs at the moment your finished product enters stock. For example actual activity prices can only be reasonably calculated per period.
    Whether V-price is an option depends on the details of your scenario.
    To me material ledger is the right way to value stocks and COGS at actual cost.

  • Actual cost component values

    Hi
    We are facing an issue that actual cost component values in our system are not calculating correctly. We consider that there might be difference in our understanding regarding the calculation of actual cost component values.
    Therefore I want to understand that how actual cost component values are calculated in SAP Material Ledger. I will appreciate if anyone can elaborate this with example and formula, used for calculation.
    Regards

    Hi Saad,
    Please find below about the actual cost calculation in ML.
    In ML single -level and multi-level material settlements are available. Multilevel price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price, the single-level differences cumulated in the period, the differences between planned and actual prices, as well as input material differences (multilevel differences) are all taken into account.
    The material price calculated in multilevel price determination can be used for inventory valuation.
    The actual price for each material can be updated to the material master for the closed period.
    -During price determination, the system carries out the following calculation: 
    =>Daily Transaction
    1) Purchasing XYZ Qty 20 Std : 10, Actual : 11
       Dr) Stock XYZ 200                   CR) GRIR 220
    Purchase price differ XYZ 20
    2) Purchasing ZYX Qty 20 Std : 20, Actual : 22
       DR) Stock ZYX 400                   CR) GRIR 440
    Purchase price differ ZYX 40
    3) Good issue XYZ Qty 15 Std : 10
       DR) Material cost XYZ 150               CR) Stock XYZ 150
    4) Good issue ZYX Qty 15 Std : 20
       DR) Material cost  ZYX 300               CR) Stock ZYX 300
    5) Good receipt  234 Qty 15  Std : 40
      DR) Stock 234 600                    CR) Clearing 600
    6) Good delivery 234 Qty 10  Std : 40
       DR) Material cost  234 400         CR) Stock 234 400
    7) Good receipt  123 Qty 10 Std : 50
        DR) Stock123 500                    CR) Clearing 500
    8) Good issue  123 Qty 5 Std : 50
       DR) Material cost  123 250         CR) Stock 123 250
    9) Good receipt  ABC Qty 10 Std : 60
        DR) StockABC 600                    CR) Clearing 600
    10) Sold ABC Qty 5 Std 60
        DR) COGS 300                          CR) Stock ABC 300
    => Monthly Material Ledger Closing
    1) Single-level price determination
       DR) Stock XYZ  5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 *  price difference 20) 
       CR) Purchase price differ XYZ 20
    *Transfer price difference to 234  15 ( Good issue  qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 *  price difference 20)
        DR) Stock ZYX  10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 *  price difference 40) 
        CR) Purchase price differ ZYX 40
    *Transfer price difference to 234  30 ( Good issue  qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 *  price difference 40)
    2) Multi-level price determination
        DR) Stock234  5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 *  price difference 15) 
        CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from XYZ  15
    *Transfer price difference to 123 from 234  10 ( Good issue  qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15
           * price difference 15)
        DR) Stock  234 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 *  price difference 30) 
        CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from ZYX 30
    *Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 20
            ( Good issue  qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15 *  price difference 30)
        DR) Stock 123 15  ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 *  price difference 30) 
        CR) Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 30
    * Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
                ( Good issue  qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 *  price difference 30)
        DR) Stock  ABC 7.5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 *  price difference 15) 
        CR) Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
    *Not allocated price difference 7.5
                ( Sold qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
    3) consumption revaluation
             DR) COGS ABC 7.5                     
             CR) Not allocated price difference 7.5
    => Current Actual Stock Amount
       1) XYZ Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 55 (actual price : 11)
       2) ZYX Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 110 (actual price : 22)
       3) 234 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 215 (actual price : 43)
       4) 123 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 265 (actual price : 53)
       5) ABC Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 307.5 (actual price : 61.5)
    I hope you understand the process of actual cost cal in ML.
    Regards,
    chandu.

  • Confirmation with errors in calc. actual costs for PM-order

    Hi,
    We have a PM-order with notifications and good movements that has tecnical completion status and is already settled. So we want to set it with bussines completion status, but an error arises: "Unprocessed future change recs for order 5009385 prevent del. flag/completion"
    We already checked for automatic goods receipt pending, backflushes, etc. and the only found is an error record in actual costs calculation (trn. COFC). Looking at this record the message says: "No prices could be determined for object Activity type CONA/900097/PM-100" (message KW 407).
    We checked price set for the activity type and cost center and is set for all the periods of actual fiscal year. Then looking at the details for above message, we found the following: "No price could be found for object Activity type CONA/900097/PM-100 with price indicator 7 and value type 4"
    The question is: why system is trying to get price for activity type PM-100 with price indicator 7 instead of 3 as usual for our PM-orders? How price indicator is defined from actual PM-order parameters? Any idea?
    Regards,
    mr.

    Hi
    Whats your activity type category? I believe it should be 1
    Your point is right, price indicator shud be 3 because while confirmation system uses the planned rate.. And price indicator pertains to actual activity price..
    Check whether you have calculated or maintaned actual activity price or not in KBK6
    Ajay M

  • Actual Cost

    hi all,
    Can anyone tell me wat r the pre-requisites to be maintained for calculating actual cost for an internal activity ...
    i have not maintained any material or assigned resource to it...
    i can view only Planned cost not the actual costs...
    hw to calculate actual costs
    Regards,
    Preeti.P.G

    hi ,
    as u all three of u mentioned to check few settings ...i am done with them....
    no pblem in them...
    to Shrikant, yes the costing variant is defined for actual..its PS03
    Can u tell more about OPL1..i mean wat need to be maintained
    to Varshal, CNR2,KP26,AND OPUV are maintained correctly
    to venkat, the cost indicator is checked but the Gen.Cost.Act is unchecked...
    to see the cost i always go to Edit->costs->plan/Actual->Activity/Element....
    is it correct path????
    Regards,
    Preeti.P.G
    Edited by: Preeti PG on May 14, 2008 11:18 AM

Maybe you are looking for