Cost elements set in KEI1 A1 Settle Production Variances?

Dear Experts,
What kinds of cost elements would be set in KEI1 If the PA transfer str. is A1Settle Production Variances?
10     Input price variance
20     Input quantity variance
30     Resource-usage variance
40     Remaining input variance
50     Mixed-price variance
60     Output price variance
70     Lot size-/fixed-cost variance
80     Remaining variance
90     Scrap
Could i say "cost elements that we can see when we do KKS1 variance caluation?
Or else?
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
You NEVER assign cost elements to value fields for mapping the settlement in COPA. Instead of that what you do is in the source tab for the line (eg 10 Scrap) select the radio button called ' varainces on production orders' and input the appropriate variance category eg. eg SCRP. In value field tab you would assign the appropriate value field. There is no need to assign cost elements. When you execute variance calculation the information is captured in the following fields and the same flow to COPA when you assign the variance category to value fields.
PRIV      Input Price Variance
QTYV     Input Quantity Variance
RSUV     Resource-Usage Variance
INPV             Remaining Input Variance
MXPV     Mixed-Price Variance
OPPV     Output Price Variance
LSFV     Lot Size Variance/Fixed-Cost Variance
REMV     Remaining Variance
SCRP     Scrap
The variance calculation is not just a simple difference between the cost elements it is also related to quantity as well.
Kind Regards // Shaubhik

Similar Messages

  • Settle Production Variances to COPA- Cost elements and Value fields

    Dear All,
    I know this question has been discussed in the past, but I have one specific doubt regarding this topic.:
    When assigning cost elements to variance categories in t-code KEI1, how do we figure out what combination of cost elements (in the top half of the screen) constitute Input Price Variance, Scrap variance etc (in the bottom half of the screen)? I know the net of the postings on those cost elements tells us what variances we are looking it, but how do we get the cost elements (group) for let's say, 'Input/Output Quanity Varinace or 'Lot size Variance' ?
    Or is this a futile exercise? May be I should just create three types of variances: Labor, Machine and Overhead. And I know what cost elements (net of the postings) would, in total, make up the $ variance in each of those categories. I can then use them in my report painter reports.
    Please help clear the fog for me.
    Ajay?
    Thanks a lot,
    Deepak

    Hi Deepak,
    Welcome to SDN!!
    There are 2 ways of updating variances in COPA... I Prefer the 2nd option always...
    1. Category wise variances (Input Prc, Usage var, etc) - Here, create a Cost ele group, where in you include all the Cost elements that can be posted to the Prod orders
    For the sake of simplicity, you can include Cost elements 1 to 99999999 in the Cost element group...
    2. Cost Comp Structure wise variances -
    a. Create as many assignment lines in PA Trf Structure as in your Cost Comp Str...
    Eg: If your Cost Comp Str in OKTZ has Raw Mat, Labor, Overhead - Create 3 Assignments in PA Trf Structure..
    b. Assign the same cost elements in the SOURCE as in the Cost Comp Str
    c. Choose the radio button "Costs/Revenues" in your assignment line, instead of " Variance on Production orders"
    d. Assign each Assignment line to a separate Value Field
    br, Ajay M

  • Secondary Cost Element Setting Criteria

    Hello all SAP usrs
    I am quite green for Controlling.
    I have a question need all your help.
    Could I know what criteria to be used to set secondary cost element? Also I would like to know the usage of the secondary cost element. Please share some knowledge on it. Thanks!
    Best Regards!
    Gavin

    Hi Gavin
    Secondary cost elements are like production costs, material overheads, production overheads, they can be created and administered in only CO.  These are used in internal cost allocation, overhead calculation, settlement transactions., it does not flow to FI...
    When cost element carries cost with in CO, then they are called secondary cost element.
    Example.... - Take Product Costing
    On manufacture of the goods the cost of the above product (production order) is arrived at accumulating material cost + operational cost + overheads (%), additive cost if any.
    The cost of operation is accumulated in cost centre be it production / production service / service cost centres, while booking FI entries.
    Those operational cost has to be allocated to production order based on operational activities carried on and its cost involved in it. Those operation activities in CO are termed as activity types and has to link the same in KP26 with rates and cost centre (ie., sender cost centre and receiver production order).
    In order to find the production order cost, the allocation of cost from sender cost centre to production order for the operational activities carried on and its cost associated with it, have to be loaded, hence in CO the cost centre allocate that portion of operational cost to production order, and this cost is carried by a cost element (since there are no FI involvement and entries are flowing within CO by crediting sender cost centre and debiting receiver production order a cost element has to be created.... say "Operational Cost - Activity" the entry will be
    Operational Cost - Activity (Production Order) Dr Rs.XX
       To Operational Cost - Activity (Cost Centre) Cr Rs.XX
    The entries are with in CO. And the cost element created is secondary since it does not has an link with GL Account in FI correspondingly.
    In conclusion there is need to creatre a secondary cost element when when you want to disribute the cost with in CO module not in FI
    Reagrds,
    RKD

  • Settling production variances when the price control of the material is "V

    Hi,
    Scenario: 1) Materials are maintained at moving average price.
                    2) Production variances need to settle to material and MAP need to be adjusted.
    Issue:  When the closing stock of the material is less than the negative variance need to be settled from the production order   the system is giving the message "Moving average price for material is negative"
    Questions: 1) What is the solution for settlement of negative variance to material when there is no stock?
                       2) Is there is any way to settle these variances to price difference account only when the stock is not available. if stock is available the variance has to adjust the stock, if not settle to the price difference account. Is there anys standard settling for this?
    Advance thanks for your help
    Regards
    Koteswararao Padarti

    Hi Rao
    You should never have Price Control V for In House made material...
    That will ruin your inventory valuation forever.. Consider the eg below if your price control is V
    1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and at period end if Qty is lying in stock, 10 variance will also be inventorized
    BUT, now consider this
    1. 1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    3. You Mfr on Jan 10 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    4. On jan 15, you consume Qty 1 and qty lying in stock is 1
    5. In period end, when you do settlement, following will happen
    a. For prod order 1: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price will shoot upto 110
    b. For prod order 2: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price (MAP) will shoot upto 120
    System wont check whether the qty lying in stock pertains to prod order 1 or 2... It will simply check if the Qty of prod order matches with qty lying in stock. hence, it will keep on inventorizing variance in this case.... and your MAP will touch the sky
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Settling Product cost variance

    Hi All
    When you are settling product cost variance, It will hit two accounts, One GBB-AUF and PRD-PRF. And PRD-PRF should not be  a cost elemen as per the best practice.
    My question is, What are the impacts , if we create PRD-PRF as cost element?

    Steve,
    Before impact, the production order variance is come from one of the cost object (Production order/Cost center), so you no need to send again to cost centers or any another cost objects.
    Impact: The differences accountability becomes double rather than one time record. System may issue some error message some where settee time if it's cost element means i suspect.
    Thanks

  • WBS settlement to AUC - use original cost elements?

    Hello gurus
    We have an allocation structure which settles project WBS costs to AUC.
    The issue is that it is using a single settlement cost element for all the costs going to the AUC.
    I notice there is a tick box 'by cost element' in the 'Allocation structure:settlement cost elements' entry for FXA.
    What is the result of using this tick box?
    We would like the original cost elements in the WBS to be credited rather than the single one.
    Is this possible?
    Thanks everyone

    Hi
    - we do not have secondary cost elements posted
    - we do not use budget checking
    As I said, we would like the original cost elements against the WBS to be credited. The single one is causing problems because it posts in total to 55291 (as in the configuration) which does not reconcile back to the many cost elements posted to the WBS.
    Is this possible?
    What is the effect of the check box 'by cost element' as we do not understand the help text on this checkbox field and are not sure if this could solve the problem (or there is a downside to using this). If this is not possible we would like to know as well.
    Thanks all

  • Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA

    Hi,
    While settling the AUC internal order,i am gettingg the below error.Kindly advice me
    Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
    Message no. KD506
    Diagnosis
    In allocation structure A1 (controlling area AFCO), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
    Procedure
    Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hi Supriya,
    Go to SPRO-> Controlling > Internal orders>Actual postings>Settlement> Maintain Allocation structures & choose A1 and go to assignment, select the relevant category like raw material / consumption and then go to source, check the range of cost elements first then click the settlement cos t element and under that choose FXA and define the settlement cost element which must be created under 22 category.
    After maintainig the above, you will not get the error anymore.
    Thanks & Regards
    Anuj Agarwal

  • Settement of cost of one GL (Cost element) to one single reciever GL

    Dear All,
    We have business requirement that we want  to settle cost of one specific GL (CELEM) to one specific GL only.
    So, I have tried to map the same in Allocation structure the same relevant cost element in sender and another one in
    Settlement cost element (to which this cost should settle).
    But I am getting error as :Specify original cost element ('OCE'), or enter a settlement cost element".
    The cost element which i am assigning as settlement cost element is already created as settlement c.Ele.
    Pls help me or Is there any other way I can map the same?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Taral Patel

    Hi Taral
    What you are doing is not right.... The Settlement cost element that you assigned in the Alloc Str must be of Category 21/22... In your case, I think it is Category 01.. Is that right?
    The GL to which you want to settle must be the settlement receiver in settlement rule... It should not be assigned as "Settlement cost element " in Alloc Structure
    If you have posted to 5 GL accounts in Internal Order and you want to settle one out of 5 GLs to GL Account 1001, then follow the steps below
    1. In your Alloc Str, tick "By Cost Element"
    2. Create a Source Structure and assign it in the settlement rule
    a. Create 2 assignments in the Source structure, 10 and 20
    b. In the 1st assignment  10- Specify the 1 GL account
    c. IN the 2nd assignment 20, specify the other 4 GL accounts
    3. While creating settlement rule, create 2 settlement rules....
    a. In 1st rule - Specify Settlement receiver as G/L account 1001 and choose Source Str Assignment 10
    b. In 2nd rule - Specify the desired Settlement receiver and choose Source Str Assignment 20
    BR,Ajay M

  • Creation of secondary cost element

    Hai SAP Gurus
    Could any one please let me now how to create secondary cost element in SPRO.
    Thanks.

    You can create secondary cost elements in KA06. There is no pre-requisite of creating GL accounts.
    Cost elements describe the origin of costs. Cost elements are defined as either
    primary and secondary. Primary cost elements arise through the consumption of
    production factors that are sourced externally. Secondary cost elements arise
    through the consumption of production factors that are provided internally.
    The Chart of accounts contains all general ledger (GL) accounts belonging to
    Financial Accounting.
    Expenses and Revenue accounts in Financial Accounting correspond to
    Primary Cost and Revenue Elements respectively.
    Secondary Cost Elements are used exclusively in CO to identify internal cost
    Flows such as assessments or settlements. They do not have corresponding
    General ledger accounts in FI and are defined in CO only.
    When you create a cost element, you must assign a cost element category. This
    Assignment determines the transactions for which you can use the cost element.
    You can create cost elements automatically by making default settings that are used
    To specify the cost element, or cost element interval that you wish to create.
    You can create cost elements manually in bulk with the help of LSMW or BDC.
    Primary Cost Element Categories:
    1 - Primary costs / cost-reducing revenues
    3 - Accrual / deferral per surcharge
    4 - Accrual / deferral per debit = actual
    11 - Revenus
    12 - Sales Discounts
    22 - External Settlement
    Secondary Cost Element Categories:
    21 - Internal Settlement
    31 - Order / Project results analysis
    41 - Overhead Rates
    42 - Assessment
    43 - Internal activity allocation
    50 - Project related incoming orders: Sales
    51 - Project related incoming orders: Others
    52 - Project related incoming orders: Costs
    61 - Earned Value
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Cost elements for WIP (TCODE : OKGA)

    Hi All,
    I am working with Production Order wip calculation, varaince and settlement.
    In the RA key configuraion,(for WIP calculation)In OKGA, tcode we define, the cost elements for a perticular line id, for WIP calculation.
    I wanted to know, what is the purpose of these two cost elements.
    If I execute line item report, I dont see any value on these cost elements, after wip calc and settlement.
    However, I see the work in process on it, in the layout. I want to know, the exact purpose of these cost elements assignment.
    Is there any internal controlling document that is getting posted?
    Regards
    SR

    Hi Swastik,
    Those cost elements (category 31) are used to calculate and store WIP values at the detailed level of so called line IDs.
    Line IDs are groups of cost elements that were posted to production order.
    For example you can calculate and store WIP separately for Raw Materials, Semis, Activities and overhead.
    You can also settle them to different GL Accounts via mapping in txn.OKG8.
    Hope it helps,
    Szymon

  • G/L account & cost element

    Pls. clarify how G/L account & cost element is utilized in case of PM orders i.e. actually how these two relate to costing in PM orders.

    Hi,
    Basically Cost Elements are Cost Carriers. Cost elements enable you to break down the cost associated with one cost bucket into more granular entities.
    Primary Cost Element:
    When cost element carriers cost between FI and CO they are called Primary, the link is established GL A/c = Cost element(Primary). Primary cost elements are like materail costs, personnel costs, energy costs... where a corresponding GL account exists in FI..to allow costs to flow...
    Secondary Cost Element :
    When cost element carries cost with in CO, then they are called secondary cost element. 
    Secondary cost elements are like production costs, material overheads, production overheads, they can be created and administered in only CO.  These are used in internal cost allocation, overhead calculation, settlement transactions., it does not flow to FI...
    Plant Maintenance:
    Cost Elements will be linked to Value Categories. Based on that, costs will be calculated for the PM Order. Cost element creation is based on Business Requirements. For Example, if you want to see the Material Cost (without considering whether internal or external), one cost element will be defined. If you want to see the same separately, 2 different cost elements should be defined. This is apllicable for labor category as well (Internal or External).
    In turn, based on cost element assignment under Allocation Structures, settlement will be done on those cost elements. In Allocation structures, Source cost elements & Settlement cost elements will be defined. Based on that, while doing order settlement, costs will be posted to concern cost elements from cost objects (Orders).
    [Cost Elements|http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/sapco004.htm]
    Regards,
    Maheswaran.
    Edited by: Maheswaran.K on May 2, 2011 8:54 AM

  • COPA Configuration for settlement of Production Variances

    Hi,
    Can anybody explain me detail configuration steps required to settle production variances to COPA in case of Make to Stock Scenario.
    Helpful answers will be rewarded with points.
    Regards
    Milind Nair

    Hi
    These are broadly the requirements for settling production variances:
    1.) The production variances first need to be calculated in CO-PC.
    2. Your PA transfer structure must contain assignments of variance categories to COPA value fields.
    3. In the settlement profile, you define the variances to be settled and profitability segments should be a valid receiver.
    4. The settlement rule to profitability segments is created automatically based on the information available in the production order (product, product group, plant and so on).
    5. You must have maintained number ranges for record type "C".
    6. The desired form of Profitability Analysis (costing based) must be active in the relevant controlling area.
    Hope this is useful
    S Jayaram

  • Default cost element unexpected OKEP

    Hi Experts,
    I ask for your help in the following situation.
    In transaction KO88, trying to settle an order, the "Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure Z1" arises.
    "Diagnosis :
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters). Cost element 5111900300 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element."
    This cost element "5111900300" is the default class for the controlling area (transaction OKEP).
    The strange behaviur is that in past months the settle for this order never get to the Cost element indicated; to test the settle, the cost element was added to the allocation structure Z1, and it was found out that the FI docs refering to Down Payments are the ones that take this cost element into the settle, and it is strange because in past months the down payments in the same PO takes the correct cost class.
    It is strange too that the corresponding FI doc for the Down Payment producing the error has not asociation with the Purchasing Document; that could be the reason it is not taking the cost class from the PO.
    I know is a little complex, but I can not found out a note for this and support refers to this as a consulting issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi..
    System response is correct because in OKEP default cost element is posted without ref of PO.
    If you want to post in ref of PO don't assign any cost element in OKEP.
    kkumar

  • Creating Cost Elements for OBYC Accounts

    Hi
    We are implementing COPA and we have manufacturing scenario (MTS) also. Now i have created cost elements (with category as 1). Now its giving me error for CO object when i post any SD entry (at the time of PGI and releasing billing document to accounting) or MM entry (MIGO / MIRO). So please help me cost elements needs to be created for following accounts:
    Price difference A/c
    Rounding off A/c
    Small difference A/c
    If i do not create it as cost element, will it effect my COPA / Product costing / Cost center planning.
    Please help

    We are implementing COPA and we have manufacturing scenario (MTS) also. Now i have created cost elements (with category as 1). Now its giving me error for CO object when i post any SD entry (at the time of PGI and releasing billing document to accounting) or MM entry (MIGO / MIRO). So please help me cost elements needs to be created for following accounts:
    Price difference A/c
    Rounding off A/c
    Small difference A/c
    If i do not create it as cost element, will it effect my COPA / Product costing / Cost center planning.
    When your postings hit CO (COPA) from Billing the system is expecting the Real CO Object (e.g. Cost Centre, Internal Order, WBS, Profitabilit Segment etc) to be Profitability Segment.
    The RWIN interface (program group that posts to FICO - includes COPA) is checking and finding that there are Cost Elements created for the 'account determination' (accounts determined in Billing) that have a Cost Element category of 1 and I assume that you have determined these postings should go to COPA. Thus the error.
    For CE Cat 1 (Primary costs/cost-reducing revenues) the system expects a Cost Object that is not a Profitability Segment.
    The solution is to not create them or to use CE Cat 11 or 12 which allows Prof Segment.
    Take into account the fact that if you are using the Reconciliation Ledger then CE Cat 11 or 12 should be used (i.e. adding the REAL (not statistical) postings in COPA + Cost Centre Accounting + WBS + Internal Orders = FI P&L).
    Please test the use of CE Cat 11 or 12. The problem is that if you have already posted to the old CE's you will need to create new ones as you can't change CE cat once posted to.
    The Business Analyst Question would be: Where does the Business want to see the REAL postings of Price Difference, Rounding Off and Small Difference? In COPA (then see above explanation - I would assume the Business want it here) or in Cost Centres (adjust your config and use CE cat 1).
    Hope this helps.

  • PSG- Assign Setlement Cost Element

    We have service and sales order that have settlement rule PSG.  At settlement an  FI posting is made, which are defined in OKG8.
    PA uses the Cost elements (890963) assigned in OKG4 as the source. The PA transfer structure is complete - assigning values to Value Fields (VVC10)
    When this settlement is complete - a Secondary Cost element is assigned to the settlement transaction (870200) and I see it in the Cost Analysis of the Orders
    Where is this  secondary cost element (870200) assigned?
    thanks in advance for help
    Althea

    Found the answer - Allocation Structure which is under Cost object controlling > Period End > Settlement

Maybe you are looking for