Cost of Sales Amount more then Sales Amount

Hi All
We have an issue at a customer where the cost of sales amount is more then the Sales amount for the month of august...for the a specific customer group.
The account balances also reflect the same.
The customer uses Advance Gl account determination and managed Items by Item Group...where each item group as their own Stock, Sales and Cost of sales account...this is managed with the rules in the advanced GL determination.
We have ran the general ledger report to see if there are any peculiar transactions, but we cant seem to see anything out of the ordinary.
Is there anything else we can check to find out where the problem lies.
Any ideas are welcome.
Thank you.
Jerusha

Hi Jerusha,
Run this query and check the last column grossprofit .  If it's negative you have a negative profit and then see the document.
SELECT T1.[DocNum], T1.[DocDate], T0.[DocEntry], T0.[LineNum], T0.[ItemCode], T0.[Dscription], T0.[Quantity], T0.[TotalSumSy], T0.[GrssProfit] FROM INV1 T0  INNER JOIN OINV T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry WHERE T1.[DocDate] >= [%0] and T1.[DocDate] <=[%1]
Regards,
Augusto

Similar Messages

  • Sales Analysis report does not match Cost of Sales Account

    My client is running SAP B1 8.81 PL 6.  He has set all items to standard costing method.  He has discovered that the difference between the Sales Amount and the Gross Profit amount on the Sales Analysis report, which should equal the Cost of Sales for the Items, does not match the Cost of Sales G/L account on the P&L report.  If you look at a sample of rows, the above difference divided by the quantity equals the standard cost of the item.  There are no manual journal entries that affect the COS account for the posting period that is being analyzed.  I cannot see any mathmatical difference or problem with the above analysis, nor can I find the problem.  There is about an $85K difference between the reports.  The Sales Amount on the Sales Analysis report matches the revenue account on the P&L to the penny.  Has anyone ever compared these 2 reports?  Thank you for your help.
    Bill Turek

    If you right click on an Invoice and choose "Gross Profit" it will give you a setting on how you want to calculate the Gross Profit for that invoice.
    In the accounting point of view the "Base Price" should be "Item Cost" so that the Gross Profit will be (Net Selling Price - Item Cost = Gross Profit). This will give you the same Gross Profit amount between P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
    However, SAP B1 gives the user the ability to select a different base price other than the Item Cost.
    This gives the user the flexibility for the Sales Report. Example (Net Sales Price - Vendor Sales Price = Gross Profit). People do this sometimes because  the item's cost fluctuates if you use FIFO or average cost and they want a uniform cost to calculate their Gross Profit.
    In summary if the Base Price is not set to "Item Cost" then there will be difference in the Gross Profit between the P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
    See screenshot:
    -Eric Alo-
    B1 Financial Consultant

  • Cost of Sales & Period Account.......

    Hi SAP guru's,
    - What is the diff. between Cost of Sales Accounting and Period Accounting approach?
    - What is reconciliation ledger? what is diff between Reconciliation ledger and Special purpose ledger?
    sure we will assign good points
    thanks
    VK

    If you right click on an Invoice and choose "Gross Profit" it will give you a setting on how you want to calculate the Gross Profit for that invoice.
    In the accounting point of view the "Base Price" should be "Item Cost" so that the Gross Profit will be (Net Selling Price - Item Cost = Gross Profit). This will give you the same Gross Profit amount between P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
    However, SAP B1 gives the user the ability to select a different base price other than the Item Cost.
    This gives the user the flexibility for the Sales Report. Example (Net Sales Price - Vendor Sales Price = Gross Profit). People do this sometimes because  the item's cost fluctuates if you use FIFO or average cost and they want a uniform cost to calculate their Gross Profit.
    In summary if the Base Price is not set to "Item Cost" then there will be difference in the Gross Profit between the P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
    See screenshot:
    -Eric Alo-
    B1 Financial Consultant

  • Is purchase tax part of Cost of sales?

    hi,
    When calculating the cost of sales do we regard the purchase tax as part of cost of sales? If i give a scenario below :-
    purchase invoice
    ============
    stocks   USD100
    purchase tax  USD20
    Invoice total = USD120
    In the above case, will both the stocks and purchase tax be lumped together as Cost of sales or only the stocks amount?

    Hi,
    if the purchase tax is recoverable - then it not included in the sales. if it not recoverable you can include the sales.
    Raghav

  • Adding Cost of Sales for Non-Stock articles to POS Inbound Pricing Schema

    Hi guys
    I'm working on a requirement to derive the Cost of Sales for non-stock items by pulling the current cost for the site and multiplying it by the billed quantity on VBRP. We could create a new condition type using purchase org, article and site in the condition table and manually enter condition records. However it would be more elegant to copy prices from the Purchasing list or deal prices into new condition types in the POS inbound pricing procedure. However SAP standard doesn't seem to allow condition copying from purchasing to sales.
    Regards
    Brett

    Hi ,
    As it happens you need to do this for Non-Stock Articles only.... then you need a routine to do this .
    And then in IS -Retail do  we not use  NETPrice or Final Cost Price to derive the Sales Price ... In that case you get the Cost Price when the Billing doc is getting posted at line level...
    Regards
    Amitava

  • Cost of sales in NEw GL

    Hi,
    Can anybdoy please let me know what is the Cost of Sales ledger functionality in New GL account in ECC 6.0? I tried to find out from our forum list but there is no particular specification on that. Or if any body can send me the good documentation on that that would be really appreciate.
    Please help me. It's very urgent. I'll really appreciate your time and help.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Niki Shah.

    Cost of sales accounting compares the sales revenue for an accounting period with the manufacturing costs of the activity. The expenses are allocated to the commercial functional areas (manufacturing, sales and distribution, administration, and so on). Expenses and revenues that cannot be assigned to the functional areas are reported in further profit and loss items, sorted according to expense and revenue type.
    With this type of grouping, cost of sales accounting identifies where costs originate in a company. It therefore portrays the commercial purpose of the expense.
    <b>For example, you can use a same GL account for salaries, but based on the cost center it is posted, the amount can go above the gross margin or below. Each cost center is associated with a functional area. like Production and Admin.</b>

  • Difference between cost of sales & sales revenue

    What is the difference between cost of sales & sales revenue ?
    Does it get stored in SD cubes or GL cubes ?
    Regards

    Sales Revenue is the total sales amount. Cost of Sales, also referred to as Cost of Goods Sol, are the costs associated with building product (e.g. raw materials,  labour, etc in the case of a manufacturer).
    These figures are going to be in the General Ledger, or some companies do this in Profit Center Accounting (PCA).

  • Cost in Sales Order and Billing not match

    Dear all,
    I am facing a problem that the cost in Sales Order and Billing (order-related billing) not match.
    The error seems related to sales order is getting moving price (MBEW-VERPR) as cost but billing is calculated by issued amount / qty.
    Here's the detail (refer to the screen captures).
    Sales qty = 1330 PC.
    Local currency = HKD, sales doc currency = RMB, exchange rate = 1.26215.
    Condition type ZCSR, condition category = G (Internal price).
    When creating sales order ,
      Cost is take from MBEW-VERPR => 1.86 HKD
      Cost converted to doc currency =>  1.473 RMB => 1.47 RMB
      Total amount = 1,330 x 1.47 = 1,955.10 RMB
    When creating billing from the delivery note,
    Cost seems taking from total value divided by total stock in the article doc.
    Cost = 2,477.82 / 1,330 = 1.863022556390 HKD => 1.476 RMB => 1.48 RMB.
    Total amount = 1330 x [(2,477.82 / 1,330) / 1.26215] = 1,963.17 RMB
    My goal is to align the same cost and amount in sales order and billing.
    Please help.
    Thank you very much.

    Dear joan,
    Thank you very much for your advise.
    I implemented example 1 as in note 24832, trying to disable price re-determination in billing.
    However it doesn't work.
    Added code in example 1:
    Copy control Delivery type LF to invoice F2, pricing type changed to X:
    Still ZCSR re-determined but not copying from sales order (1.47 RMB):

  • Cost of sales not getting generated during final settlement of refurbishment order

    Hi
    We use refurbishment Order and we have settlement receiver as PSG. We use RA Key. We use raw material components CE 1, , We confirm debit labor,
    we also receive Revenue cost element category 11 .
    We have RA key assigned in the Order.
    Now We ran and save values of RA and run KO88 and Dr. WIP Cr. Cons offset is credited. this is when the status is REL and when the status is TECO, then we calculate RA and run KO88 RA is reversed.  Now COGS is not getting populated at all and there is no CO PA document also. Kindly let me know the configuration needed for this purpose. I need this very urgently.
    This is a simple scenario and this no connection with SD as of now.
    Aparaajith

    Hi Szymon
    We have 3 types of refurbishment order type
    1. External Consulting services
    Here the cost of labor, consulting charges are booked against this service order
    Since the job is done more than 2 months then at the end of 1st month WIP is calculated
    2nd month job is done -TECO, so the reverse WIP and cost of Sales comes into play.
    Here they book revenue against the service order. Since MTO is not used here, based on status of the order TECO, they create billing request and billing where service order is the cost object
    So Service Orders hold costs 2nd month end rev and cost.
    My problem is the RA what I use does not create Cost of Sales automatically I know there is some configuration is wrong.
    2nd issue: CO PA does not get created when I do TECO and consequently I am unable to move sales and cost of sales to copa.
    2. third party repair
    Here there is no link between sales order and refurbishment order.
    So no revenue is booked for this refurbishment order
    Next they issue material and move to WIP and 2nd month they move the cost to COS ,reverse WIP>
    I use a RA key which does move COS creation of entry.
    This is my problem
    How to move to COS without revenue and I will create manually 2nd month by using a report to take TECO status and then create revenue entries through SD.
    I need response very soon, if you can give me.
    Aparaajith

  • Cost of sales accounting in sap classical GL.

    Hi Expert,
    we are facing problem to know the Material Cost against Sales i.e Revenue for Particular Product. kindly help through which module we will configure so that customer will come to know, while producing the finished goods this much of material Cost, Manpower , Energy as so on occurred till finished goods. Client Manufacturing Automotive Spare Parts for Domestic  customer as well foreign. Total 25 Products manufacturing , purchase Raw Material then produced finished goods.
    Kindly let me know which Module we will start to config.
    Note : we are working on  ECC 6  but still NEW GL not activated and Document splitting. we want in existing GL i.e Classic GL.
    Urgent Requirement.
    Yr immediate response will be highly appreciated.
    Kind regards
    Pranav Kr. Gupta
    SAP FICO Consultant

    Hi Pranav
    Your requirement can be met by product costing and copa
    Standard cost estimate split can be transferred to copa during billing. Your std cost estimate will comprise of raw material, labor, overhead etc. When you release bulling from vf01, system will update cost split also along with revenue
    However, this split will be based on std cost. Variances are updated to copa during month end when you settle the prod order... if you want the split in copa based on actual cost, you need material ledger activated
    To fetch std cost split in copa, you need
    1. Costing key in ke40
    2. Val strategy in ke4u
    3. Val field mapping to cost components in ke4r
    4. Costing key assignment in ke4j or kepc
    This is addressed many times in the forum. You can check for the above steps in scn
    Br.  Ajay M

  • How to keep the same cost in Sales order and return order?

    Hi experts,
    When I create a sales order with item cost 100 USD.
    Then the cost of item changed and down to 90 USD.
    When I do goods return refer to the sales order. How can I keep the same cost (VPRS) 100 USD but not 90 USD?
    I made a test the cost in sales order is 100 USD but 90 USD in return sales order.
    I want the cost in return sales order is 100 USD.
    How can I do?
    Thanks,
    Lance

    Hi,
    Let me tell u my understanding of your requirement, after the sales the cost of the item is changed to some thing low than it was in sales order or invoice, in this scenario you need to transfer the cost of the material as it is in the sale order or invoice (which you are taking as reference to create a Return Order), am i right?
    If so, you can proceed like this.
    In the copy controls of Billing to Sales orders ( F2 to RE) we have the pricing type N assigned to it ( Transfer pricing components unchanged, New Cost) here the system is reading the change of the cost again from the material master. if you don' t want it to read the material master data again we can have a change try with pricing type 'D'  (Copy Pricing elements unchanged), and try now.
    let me know the result.
    hope this will solve your problem.

  • Plan cost on sales orders

    Good morning,
    does anyboby know if and how is possible planning costs on sales orders?
    Currently, sales orders are set as account assignment; actual costs are accounted without problems on sales orders and report KKBC_KUN properly shows costs. But no plan data.
    Furthermore, we execute cost estimate on sales orders through CK51N.
    Please tell me something more if you know.
    Thanks,
    Regards
    Enrico

    Dear Enrico,
    check the documentation at
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/90/ba81d2446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    br, Guido

  • Cost Of Sales

    Hey Good People,
    I have a client who is having problems with the calculation o Cost of sales.
    The Client is a retailer who imports most of his products for local sale. Import and pricing is handled in foreign Currency - USD or EUR, whilst sales is in Local currency
    The Company places and Sales Order say for 10 Items at 10 Dollars Each  = 100 Dollars.
    At time of Purchase order (01.02.09) and GRN (28.02.09) the Local Currency Monthly Exchange rate to the dollar is say 10. Therefore the Equivalent in Local currency (LC) at the time of placing the order is 10 items at 100 (LC)  = 1000 (LC). At the GRN Stage, landed Costs are recorded in Local currency = Total is 500 (LC)
    Thus the total Item cost in Local currency is Purchase Price (1000) + Landed Costs (500) divided by qty (10) = 15 LC Per Item
    All this is recorded within SAP. The problem occurs on Purchase invoicing and recoding/adjustment of Cost of Sales (Delivery/Invoice Item Cost).
    As the goods are already in the store, they begin sales 01.03.09 - sales price marked up appropriately to 25 (LC).4 items are sold and the Cost of Sale for this Sales Delivery/Invoice is 6*15 = 80 (LC). 4 Remain in Stock
    The client is then sent the Purchase Invoice to pay on the 05.03.09  - here the Exchange Rate has risen to 11. Thus the Invoice is for 1100 (LC) - Equivalent to 100 USD as the order and GRN. This is paid with no problem and SAP Makes Appropriate adjustments - This will reflect in the P& L and the variance reduces overall profitability
    The problem that exists is the Sales Analysis Gross Profitability Report in SAP  - by Items and by Customer. This takes the Values in the Invoices/Deliveries whose COS cannot can never be adjusted.
    The only option would be to spread the additional cost to the other Items and this would result in some items being sold at a loss.
    Take the Example above
    4 items remain in stock - additional Cost due to Exchange differences is 100, Spread evenly to products = equals 25 added to Costs = New Cost is thus 40 (Old Item Cost plus revaluation). The selling price cannot be adjusted (need to remain competitive/consistent). Thus the remaining four are sold at a loss.
    Has anyone encountered this problem ? Can anyone propose any Solutions/Workaround
    Your input will be greatly appreciated
    Regards,
    Michael Mbiyu
    SAP B1 Consultant
    EIM Solutions, Kenya

    Hi Micheal
    Your problem is not uncommon, and one cannot expect a system to allow you to change the cost on sales afterwards as this would involve a lot of adjustments. This is normal behavior and the only workarounds would be to block imported goods from sale until the invoice has been processed, or to keep the exchange rate the same from the Goods Receipt to the invoice and allow the exchange rate difference to be absorbed when paying the invoice at the final exchange rate. This can be achieved by using the same date for the invoice as was used for the Goods Receipt.
    Is there a reason why the dates of the GRPO and Invoice differ? Usually with imports a Pro Forma Invoice is issued in order to get bank and forex approvals prior to importing goods.
    Let me know so I can better understand the timing difference in invoicing.
    Kind regards
    Peter Juby

  • Subsequent / re-activation of Cost of Sales Accounting

    We are currently engaged at a new SAP customer (ECC6) that does not currently require COS Accounting to be activated /functional area functionality, but might require it at a later stage / subsequent to the initial go-live.
    Based on the contents of SAP Note 740519, it appears that when COS Accounting is subsequently activated, the functional area cannot be repopulated for historic data when using ECC6.
    QUESTION:
    Should the customer decide to subsequently activate COS Accounting at the start of a new fiscal year (i.e. post go-live), all the P&L data will be populated with the functional area from the start of the new fiscal year. However, what about the carry forward balances for the Balance Sheet accounts? Is there a way to repopulate the "carried forward" balances in the Balance Sheet with a functional area, else the balance sheet will always contain incomplete functional area data for the carried forward balances.
    Also, please advise if there is a program available to repopulate functional areas subsequently in the event of a subsequent activation of COS Accounting. If not, if the customer activate COS Accounting even though they don't require it at present, because it appears that you cannot change the functional area assignments once updated with transactional data?
    As such, what is the recommended course of action:
    1. Only activate COS Accounting when required, but resulting issues with updating historic data with functional area.... OR
    2. Activate and configure pre go-live, but then cannot change functional area assignments once populated with transactional data.
    I look forward to hearing from you.
    Kind regards,
    Dolf

    Hi Dolf
       I have exactly the same requirement now with respect to cost of sales accounting. My client went live a couple of months back and now wants to activate Cost of Sales Accouting.  I have the same question of how to populate the existing historic data with the functional areas.
       What did you do when you had this issue? Did you find out any way or work around to update the historic data with functional area? What approach did you take during your implementation?
        Your response would be highly appreciated and rewarded.
    Vamsi

  • Functional area and cost of sales accounting (company code 2000) active

    Hi There!
    I hope someone can help.
    In our sandbox system, whenever I try to convert a Purchase requistion into a Purchase Order I get the following error message : "Functional area and cost of sales accounting (company code 2000) active".
    Anyone know how I can resolve this issue?
    Kind regards,
    Karl

    Hi,
    Double click on the error message & check the message Number..
    Then go to
    Spro>MM>Pur
    Attributes of system messages & change the Message from Error to Warning..
    Thx
    Raju

Maybe you are looking for