Cost Run in Sub Con Process

Hello all,
I have an issue. There is sub con senereo. The procurement type is F & 30 ( External pur wih subcontrcting) . In the begining i am sending raw material to sub contractor & he does operation over it & sends me the finsh component. I have maintained infor records with info catagory as subcon with price Rs.60/-  When i run the cost then i could see the cost of finish component as Rs.70/- ( Material coast rs.10 + 60rs as machining cost ).
Now again i am sending for 2nd operation for platting to sub con with info price. 10rs/ . But when i am again trying to run the cost for the material then i can not able to see the cost of plating ( 10rs) in the cost of material....
What do u think....where i am doing wrong......in both the case how can i maintain the info reocrds?
please guide.
Thanks in advance

Not answered

Similar Messages

  • Sub Con Process For Special Stock Material

    Dear Experts ,
    Can somebody please tell me , what is the procedure for sending the special stock(project) material for sub contracting .
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Avid,
    Materials assigned to sales order or project (that are located in sales order or in project special stock segment) are not "transported" in SAP to the subcontractor.
    Please check SAP online help:
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/4d/2b90b043ad11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    Subcontracting is also possible in conjunction with sales order stocks and project stocks. The subcontracting orders are account-assigned to a sales order or a WBS element. Thus, the components are not transferred (using a transfer posting) to the "stock of material provided to vendor" but are directly withdrawn from the sales order stock or the project stock at the time of the goods receipt. The material manufactured is also posted to the sales order stock or to the project stock. The cost of subcontracting is then debited to the sales order or WBS element.
    Since the components are not transferred to the "stock of material provided to vendor", we recommend that you use a transfer posting to transfer the provided components to a new storage location (for example, 9999). This enables you to obtain an overview of those stocks that are physically located at the subcontractor. This information is particularly important when you carry out a physical inventory of the sales order stocks and project stocks.
    Regards,
    Prasath

  • Sub-Con Procurement process

    Hi Experts,
    We have sub-con process. we will send 'COMPONENT1' of 100 quanity to sub-con vendor and he will send 60- 80 qunaitys of FG1 & 40 to 20 quanitys of FG2 to us but unfortunately we will not know in-advance exact quntitys of FG1 & FG2. Now, if we receive FG1 different price and FG2 have different price. So our PO price does not match with Invoice price. Please explain in detials how to model this secnario.
    Thanks,
    Naveen

    Hi Naveen,
    Without manual intervention it is not possible as you are not knowing in advance about the delivery note quantity of FG1 and FG2 from your subcontracting vendor.
    1. You can create a Subcontracing PO with two line items as FG1 ( 80 qty ) and FG2 ( 20 qty ).
    2. Post a goods issue with 541 for the supply of COMPONENT1 ( 100 nos )
    3. Before Goods Receipt ( When the physical DN is received ) you can ammend the PO with the correct quantity of FG1 and FG2.
    4. Then finally you can post your MIGO so that the cost of FG1 and FG2 service charges can be payable to your vendor without discrepancies.
    Thanks and Regards,

  • Error while costing run .

    Hello All,
    While running costing run ( plant level)  in background mode, the job is getting cancelled with some error message  "Required Parameters missing for MARA_SINGLE_READ".
    And its not allowing the costing run. Please suggest any steps to overcome this.
    Regards
    Mahesh

    Hi,
    we are having the same problem when performing the costing run just for one process order.
    Any hint?
    Thanks in advance and regards,
    Ramó

  • Sub Con PO through MRP Run

    good morning all,
         we are in buisness with Projects and do the MRP on project based.
    i have a query.
    all of you know that if Purchase order comes through MRP then it shows account assignment catagory and G/L account number. when we run mrp system creates SUB con Pr and with that POs are get create. that time system shows account assignment catagory Q ( as MRP is on Project base) & item catagory L. But G/L account number shows is stck of semi finished goods. Is it right ?
         generally when we create manually sub con po with no account assignment catagory that time all the values are automatically get captured in sub con G/L account.
    so now i want to change this settings for the Sub Con POs through MRP. please help me how to change this & while changing what effect should i check.

    Slng,
    Please check with your FI consultant.
    They should be able to default the G/L account from thier side for the account assignment catagory Q & item catagory L.
    thanks,
    Ram

  • Sub Contracting Process

    my client running fg sub contracting  (electro plating )cycle through the MRP
    after return from vendor with mvt type 105 (543) i check document list with MB51. i found following g/l account effects :
    SFG consumption for sub contract  account = 602026
    Gr/IR Clearing Account = 164335
    SFG-inventory account = 323055
    for sub contract account = 602130
    Inventory account = 320010
    Costs of goods mfg = 602200
    but if do whole sub contracting cycle without MRP i can see effect in following G/L a/C:
    Manual Cycle .
    Inventory account = 320010
    Gr/IR Clearing Account = 164335
    Price Differance Account = 602155
    change in stock = 603010
    Sub Contract expense = 603000
    SFG-inventory account = 323055
    SFG consumption for sub contract account = 602026
    my question is why this differance comes ?
    if i want gl accounts hit by manual process in MRP process what changes to be made ?

    Hi
    Kindly check with the following:
    In customizing  for that plant price differences should or not be posted during GR.
    SPRO->IMG>MM>Inv MGmt>GR-->price differences for subcontracting at GR
    Thanks

  • Multiple Bom Cost Run

    Dear Sir,
    I m doing the cost run for Semi finished Goods in whose BOM there are 3 more sub BOM which is of semi finished nature as such there is no raw material BOM in it.
    So is it possible to have the cost run.
    Regards
    Raj

    Dear Mangalraj,
    Kindly help me how to calculate co-product cost estimate which are assigned in main product
    i had define source structure and assign it in main material master for example
    Text
    Mtrl Code
    Valid to
    Eqno.
    Raw Material
    102020001
    31.12.9999
    100
    Chemical
    102020001
    31.12.9999
    30
    Chemical
    103020008
    31.12.9999
    70
    Process Cost
    102020001
    31.12.9999
    35
    Process Cost
    103020008
    31.12.9999
    25
    Process Cost
    201010003
    31.12.9999
    39
    Process Cost
    111111001
    31.12.9999
    1
    Thanks
    Trinath Gujari

  • Costing run with values for material from info record.

    Hi All
    there is requirement with my client, that when i run my costing run the values of the components in BOM should be from the latest purchase order.
    For this i am maintined valuation criteria as price from info record and sub strategy as gross price from PO.
    When i am create a PO the info record is created automatically in background. So when i run costing run the value is picked correctly.
    Now when i create a PO with same material from diff vendor the info record is generated, but on costing run it picks the value from the info record of earlier vendor. For this i go and check the conditions tab in info record, ensure its balnk and save it. Again generate new PO and then run a costing run. This time the system reads the latest info record.
    My problem is that i want to ensure that during the costing run, system should read the latest info record w/o manual intervention. System behaviour is not consistent when there is multiple vendor and same material info records. Sometimes it pick up the value and sometimes it refers the old info record.
    Can any one help me out in resolving this issue. Its critical.
    Regards
    Rakesh

    Hi!
    Generally first info records will be created with vendor, then PO will be created, based on info records price, price will be updated in PO.
    If you have more than one vendor for same material, you have to create info records for each vendor. then you need to maintain source list, where you can fix the vendor. If there is no fix vendor, then you can do schedule agreement with vendors, where you have to give proportionate percentages again each vendor.
    Now for costing run :
    1. if you have only one info record, the price will take from that info record.
    2. if you have more than one info record, you need to mantain source list, where you can tick the fixed vendor, then system will take price from that vendor info record.
    3. if there is no fixed vendor and you have maintained scehduel agreement with weightage to vendor, then higher percentage vendor info record price will be picked up.
    4. if you have more info reocrds, not maintianed source list or schedule agreement, price will be picked up from first info record ( based on info record creation date).
    5. if you have a schedule agreement, but you have given equal weightage for example 50% and 50%, then also system will pick up from first info record.
    i think it is clear now.
    regs,
    ramesh b

  • Freight Calculation in Standard cost Run

    Hi,
    The requirement is while doing the standard cost calculation through CK11N / CK40N system should show seperately how much is freight plan cost &; how much is duty plan cost.e.g.
    100 is material price as per condition PB00 Cost element 355100
    10 is freight cost (ZFR1 10%) Cost element 363170
    5 is duty cost (Zduty lets say 0.5%) Cost element 363171
    So taotal cost will be 115
    I wanted to get this in cost component wise. Client does not want manual intervention so do not want to go for additive cost method
    I had tried through Purchasing info record. I have maintained the valuation variant accordingly. Assigned correct sub strategy to it & also maintained delivery cost button in the same screen to assign conditions to origin group.
    Also I had maintained purchasing info record through me11 ; mainteined conditions there.
    These above mentioned cost elements are mapped in cost component  structure in T code OKTZ. Seperately for material ,freight &; duty
    Now when I make a PO, system is showing correct calculation as per the conditions.When I do the GR the Freight &; duty is getting posted &; these GLs are having above mentioned primary cost elements . .So the primary cost element is also getting posted correctly.
    Now the problem is
    While doing the cost run system shows me Seperate cost for material as 100 , seperate for freight 10 & seperate for duty 5, but to the same cost element i.e. 355100. So all the cost is shown as material cost ; nothing is displayed as freight or duty
    If I see the cost element report the corresponding value is flown to the corresponding cost element. But  it is not reflecting in proper cost component in cost run
    .Please guide me why this is happening. How can I resolve this
    Regards,
    Abhijit

    Hi Ajay,
    I was waiting for your reply.
    As mentioned by you, I have mapped my cost component structure like Raw material, Freigh, Duty & assigned the corresponding cost elements to it.. But still in itemisation view it shows three values
    consumption cost element 355100 - 100
    consumption cost element 355100 - 10  (which should go to freight component where I have assigned the Freight cost element)
    consumption cost element 355100  -5   (which should go to Duty component where I have assigned the Duty cost element)
    FI entries are getting posted correctly. Values are flown to coresponding cost elements.
    For the time being We will keep duty part side. We are discussing with client on this.
    But, what could be the reason of this problem. How I can achieve the below mentioned result.
    Cost component view
    Raw material -100
    Freight  - 10
    Duty - 5

  • CO/PP - Costing run - raw material cost component

    Hi
    In the costing run how raw material cost is taken?
    is it the material moving price/
    or calculated separately?
    Please help

    i think this depends on the costing variant defined in the order type
    in the costing variant, this come from the valuation variant
    for process orders you may check the following txns COR4, OPL1, OPN2

  • How purchasing master data setup impact CO costing run

    Dear all,
    Question 1:
    Could somebody out there, if you have this area of integration knowledge with CO, tell me the detail process and logic of how, when a costing run is perform, the master data in the Material master fields of Procurement Type and Special Procurement Type; Purchasing Information Records; and Source List impact the successful of costing run?
    Question 2:
    CO guy complaints that there are missing PIR and source list for following type of material setup in material master:
    A) procurement type - F, Special procurement - blank (i.e. third party)
    B) procurement type - F, Special procurement - NON-blank (i.e. can be intercompany, subcontract, vendor consignment),
    Hence Costing run unable to determine the price. Is it a valid complaints
    Regards,
    Daniel

    Hi,
    Though Costing is realted to the price control , cost lot size and valuation class in Material master.
    It almost equvalent dependent on Special Procurement type also is costing view and MRP view.
    Do refer the effect of special procurement type in costing in belowHelp Link
    https://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb7f5643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    Do refer the basisc of standarad costing estimates in below Link
    Basics of SAP Standard Cost estimate- Understanding the flow of cost settings-Part 1

  • Cost estimate/costing run

    Hi
    What is the difference between cost estimate and costing run?
    Thanks,
    Nivi

    Hello Ram,
    There are 3 steps in Costing Procedure. They are
    1. Creation of cost estimate
    2. Marking of cost estimate
    3. Release  of cost estimate
    Once you release cost estimate, then only system will update the required fields in the database and can be used for transactions.
    Hence, cost estimate means, it is just estimated total cost of the product and Costing Run means which inclusive of all the above three steps to complete the total process.
    Please let me know if you require any further clarifications.
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Santosh
    Reward points if helpful.

  • Restrict all goods movements for materials untill the latest costing run ex

    Hi dudes,
    1 here i have a requirement that i need to restrict all goods movements in the month for all materials(SFG,FG) untill the latest costing run(standard cost estimate) on 1st of each month.
    2. Can we restrict the status of process order in such a way that Conformation can be done only after the goods issues against production order. The goods receipt can be done only after the conformation of the process order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Robert.

    Robert,
    Procedurally you can block, by not opening the current period, before the costing run is completed, just when you wanted to release the cost estimate, at that time you can lock all users and then open the next period and then release your cost estimate and then unlock all the users. You need to work with your Basis/MM/FICO guys to have this procedure implemented.
    On the GI Check before confirmation and Confirmation check before GR, you can use Confirmation and GR releated User exits to check. There are many posts on this topic, a simple search on this forum would take you to the thread.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Sub contract process with excise documents

    Hi
    I have a scenario in my project
    MUM1- Mumbai plant
    IN01    -Vadodara Plant
    Mumbai is used only as a store for raw material (imported/Local)
    Process is from Mumbai raw material (child component) is to be shipped to sub con vendor (1000) any where in India Ex -->Banglore
    After processing Subcon vendor(1000) will send finish component to IN01 vadodara plant.
    How the process will be mapped for Excise documentation.
    required is Cenvat credit flow from Mumbai to Vadodara.
    Regards
    Ajit k

    hi
    Subcontracting under Full Payment of Duty
    u2022     Creation of Subcontracting PO (ME21N)
    here give the delivery add of vadodara palnt ,and the vendor of banglore
    u2022     Transfer Posting of Components to Subcontractor (MB1B/ME2O/MIGO)
    u2022     Creation of Outgoing Excise Invoice w.r.t. Transfer Posting Document (J1IS) - Used to send the components to Subcontractor's. Here 57F4 Challan is not created.
    Accounting Entry: -
    CENVAT Input BED - Cr
    CENVAT Input ECS - Cr
    CENVAT Input ECS - Cr
    CENVAT Suspense A/c - Dr
    u2022     Capture Vendor Excise Invoice at the time of GR of Finished Goods w.r.t. Subcontracting PO (MIGO)
    u2022     Post Excise Invoice for FG received from Subcontractor (J1IEX)
    Accounting Entry: -
    CENVAT Input BED - Dr
    CENVAT Input ECS - Dr
    CENVAT Input ECS - Dr
    CENVAT Clearing A/c - Cr
    Master Data
    u2022     MM01- Material Masters for Components and FG
    u2022     XK01 - Vendor Master (Subcontractor)
    u2022     CS01 - BOM for FG
    u2022     ME11 - Purchase Inforecord for Subcontracting
    regards
    kunal
    award if helpful

  • Issue with Sub-Con PO (543 O movement)

    Hi All,
    I find that system is not posting 543 O movement for individual components when i do a GR for sub-con PO Material. I am following the steps below.
    1. GI of components to Sub-Con PO thru' ME2o (System records a 541 movement for the components).
    2. GR of Sub-Con PO thru' MB01 (101 mvt.) But the system does not post a 543 O movement for the components.
    3. Also in ME2o when i check for these components, i notice the output still shows these components, although the stock is '0'.
    Await inputs.
    Vivek

    Hi All,
    Sorry for the late response. But after a detailed study, i notice this error is because, the user has actually transfered items which have bulk material indicator using MB1B by mistake, so when a GR for the material is done, system is not considering these bulk materials & hence no 543 O is posted.
    Also these stocks are shown as lying with the vendor.
    Now the dilemma is how to ensure these items are actually transferred to the respective finished assy & ensure that the costing of the assy is revised. If it is not possible, can i just post a 542 & reverse back these postings, will it have any financial impact? In terms of costing of the finished assembly which we received from sub-contractor will it have any impact?
    Also would like to know any standard tx which displays stock @ sub-contractor by PO or any user-exits available for this?
    Anyone to help on this?
    Edited by: Vivek on May 7, 2008 3:02 PM

Maybe you are looking for