Costing run with values for material from info record.

Hi All
there is requirement with my client, that when i run my costing run the values of the components in BOM should be from the latest purchase order.
For this i am maintined valuation criteria as price from info record and sub strategy as gross price from PO.
When i am create a PO the info record is created automatically in background. So when i run costing run the value is picked correctly.
Now when i create a PO with same material from diff vendor the info record is generated, but on costing run it picks the value from the info record of earlier vendor. For this i go and check the conditions tab in info record, ensure its balnk and save it. Again generate new PO and then run a costing run. This time the system reads the latest info record.
My problem is that i want to ensure that during the costing run, system should read the latest info record w/o manual intervention. System behaviour is not consistent when there is multiple vendor and same material info records. Sometimes it pick up the value and sometimes it refers the old info record.
Can any one help me out in resolving this issue. Its critical.
Regards
Rakesh

Hi!
Generally first info records will be created with vendor, then PO will be created, based on info records price, price will be updated in PO.
If you have more than one vendor for same material, you have to create info records for each vendor. then you need to maintain source list, where you can fix the vendor. If there is no fix vendor, then you can do schedule agreement with vendors, where you have to give proportionate percentages again each vendor.
Now for costing run :
1. if you have only one info record, the price will take from that info record.
2. if you have more than one info record, you need to mantain source list, where you can tick the fixed vendor, then system will take price from that vendor info record.
3. if there is no fixed vendor and you have maintained scehduel agreement with weightage to vendor, then higher percentage vendor info record price will be picked up.
4. if you have more info reocrds, not maintianed source list or schedule agreement, price will be picked up from first info record ( based on info record creation date).
5. if you have a schedule agreement, but you have given equal weightage for example 50% and 50%, then also system will pick up from first info record.
i think it is clear now.
regs,
ramesh b

Similar Messages

How to use copy default values for material from vendor master in Account Group

Dear all:
In define AccountGroup for vendor ,there is a field named DURAS which means default values,who can tell me how to use it?
Any informations are appreciated!

Hi Katherine,
I have tried using default value as B in the customizing
If i maintain default values in the vendor master record, it will automatically adopt in the purchase info record.
Here i tried using sales person & telephone no field in vendor master record & it automatically adopts to purchase info record.
Region sales person and telephone no i have maintained in vendor master record, it automatically fetches to info record for the particular account group. I am not sure if there is any relation between vendor master and material master record.
Regards
Subbu.

Restricting issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type

Dear Users,
I have a requirement like we want to restrict issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type i.e., we want to issue goods to cost center only through reservation and that too only for specific material types. Is there any standard solution for this, please provide your suggestions.
Thanks,
Manoj

Hi Ajay,
Thanks for valuable input.
I also thought in the same line , but user has the following concern on this:
Assessment Cycle: As per Users, it cannot be used because this will allocate based on allocation basis. But they need, the values that was posted at the time of transaction and as per materials. So it wont be accurate through Assessment cycle,
OKB9: They have different Cost center for different valuation area for the same GL Account.
Hence through OKB9 also, we cannot post directly to COPA.
That's the reason the above option were not adopted.
My other concern to this is:
In CKM3, we have two lines under consumption, one for Normal sales PGI and other is Cost Center.
After doing revaluation of consumption in CKMLCP, we see one line under Cost Center :Revaluation of Consumption Figure"
My question, where can I see that figure whether in any table or in Cost Center report??
If that is also available we can try to match those values and post to COPA.
Let me know your thought on this.
Thanks and regards
Kami

Vendor Hierarchy with Pricing from Info Record

Hi All,
We are currently exploring configuration options available to use a 'Vendor Hierarchy' for price determination during Purchase Order processing - R/3 46C
We also have a specific business requirement that requires our Vendor Hierarchy node prices be maintained in an Info Record (using a 'PB00' type condition type) rather than the 'LH01' and 'LH02' condition types used to maintain price conditions directly in the Vendor Hierarchy.
Does anyone know if it is possible to combine a Vendor Hierarchy with pricing that is sourced from Info Record rather than the standard 'LH01' and 'LH02' Vendor Hierarchy pricing conditions in the standard system?
Thanks,
Ravelle
References:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/08464f470311d1894a0000e8323352/frameset.htm">Vendor Hierarchy</a>
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/084676470311d1894a0000e8323352/content.htm">Vendor Hierarchy - Purchase Order Pricing</a>

A solution has not been identified...query closed.

Table for Analysis authorization along with values for authorization fields

Hi,
I am looking for table that contains the Analysis Authorization name along with values for all the authorization fields within this Analysis Authorization. Individually i can go to PFCG or Rsecadmin but since i need all the Analysis auth objects, i need to get this info into excel, so need a table.

Hi Prashanth
You can check RSECVAL that is appropriate for your requirement please let us know if any further help is needed.
Thanks & Regards
Santosh Varada

Parallel ledger with values for past period

hi
we are creating addl ledgers with different fiscal year variant
is it possible for me to fill up this ledger with values for a past period?
my fiscal year variant is V3 April - March, however I need the parallel ledger for calender year Fiscal Yr Variant K4.
Going live with this in april is it possible to populate this ledger with values for jan-march period
regards
sameer

HI,
I am not sure if it is helpful but what you can do is to define an asset movement type limited to a valuation area, which allows you to post for example acquisitions only in on valuation area, but not in the other one.
Thus you can post ABSO with one asset movement type for one valuation area (APC-value X) for another valuation area use another movement type and post APC value Y.
Anyway the difference of the APC value (thats not ativated) needs to be posted to an P&L account.
Maybe there are other/better suggestions from other people.
Best regards, Christian

Costing is not allowed for material/PPS status - Message no. CK 399

Hi Experts,
I am getting the following error when doing a costing run via CK11N:
Costing is not allowed for material/PPS status
Message no. CK 399
Diagnosis
Material XXXXXX in plant XXXX has material status Y1. The setting for this status is such that costing cannot be carried out.
Procedure
Check the material status in the costing view and MRP 1 view in the master data record of material XXXXXX in plant XXXX (Field MAT/PPS status)
I have already checked the status of the material in both costing and MRP 1 view via MM03. Plant-Specific Material Status is Y2 (Material productive). I am not sure if the statuses are standard but I hope anyone can advice on the solution if you have encountered this one already.
Thanks,
Josef

Hi Josef,
Please go to OMS4 and check the material plant specific status for Y1 and Y2 for Mat. Cost Estimate Procedure.
Also check components of BOM for plant specific status it should be Y2 for all you components.
One of the materials to be costed has a material/PPS status which does not allow a cost estimate.
CS03 you can check the BOM components and CS12 for multiple BOM explosion.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Search for material from 2 Storage types

Hi,
When creating a delivery for Subcon PO Via ME2O the transfer order is created automatically from the source storage type
657 ( for example). The requirement is that the system should also look for material from source storage type 460 ( for example).
I did the following customization ( SPRO path):
1) Logistics execution -> Warehouse management -> Strategies -> Activate storage type search - > Determine search sequence --
For the combination of Warehouse number & Mvt type 541 ( GI to Subcon delivery) -- 657 and 460 are assigned.
2) Logistics execution -> Warehouse management -> Activities-> Transfers-> Define Mvt types-> For the combination of Warehouse number & Mvt type 541 -- I have assigned source storage type as 657.
With the above the system does the search from 657 stoarge type only and not from the both.
Is there any other setting to meet this requiremnet?
Best regards,
Prasad

Hi,
I removed 657 source storage type in the 541 mvt type set up ( Source storage type is Blank) . In the Movement Type set up for 541, "Ref.Stor.Type.Search" field is already with 541.
The Storage Type search sequence is maintained for the combination warehouse number & 541 mvt as 657 and 460 ( storage types).
When Delivery is created for Subcon PO, The Transfer order is not created automatcially ( Only delivery is created)
The requirement in detail is as below:
There are 2 plants ( AL70 & AL77) linked to 1 Warehouse (AL1). When delivery is created for subcon PO in plant AL70, the TO is also created automatically with source storage type as 657 and destination storage type as 916. The additional requirement is when delivery is created for Subcon PO in plant AL77, the TO aslo should be created automatically with source storage type as 460 and destination storage type as 916.
Regards,
Prasad

Value from info record in work order

Hi,
We have created some info record.While creating some work orders we enter info record number in peration-external tab-price field. If in some earlier order info update is tick while creating purchase order having this info record then in new work order -operations tab-external tab-price field rate is picked up from purchase order history and not from value maintained in info record (ME11/12) manually.
Is their any setting / SAP note so that all the times rate will be picked up from info record (ME11/ME12) and not from purchase order history or info update.
SAP learner.

no feedback hence closing this thread

FM to read files starting with TEST(for example) from Unix server

Hi all,
Is there a FM to read all the files which start with TEST (for example) from the Unix server?
Requirement is if we put TEST* in the selection screen for the filename, it should read all the files which start with TEST from the default Unix path.
Thanks and regards,
Anishur

Function Modules
http://www.erpgenie.com/abap/functions.htm
http://www.sapdevelopment.co.uk/fmodules/fmssap.htm
http://www.erpgenie.com/abap/index.htm
http://www.geocities.com/victorav15/sapr3/abapfun.html
Rewards if useful.........
Minal

Min.order Qty from Info record in PR in MRP

Hi,
Is there any setting by which , while running MRP, system will take min.order quantity from info record (instead of material master) ?.
If not , then is there any way to achieve the same?

Hi Csaba Szommer
You are right, If you try to convent PR in to PO, and if you have maintained min.order qty in info record, you get message ( error / warning ) as per your message setting.
Your question is also valid that if the same material is being procured by many vendors, and each vendor might have different min. order qty, Hence it has to be picked from info record only.
But I have tried with all the possibilites. While converting PR into PO, based on system message you can correct the Quantity, but if MRP generates PR ,based on the min.order qty in info record, then no need to handle such messages.
You can try also, maintain different min. order qty in Material master and info record, it will always take from Material master and never from info record.
But Logically, it should take from info record.
That is why I wanted to make the system take info record min.order.qty.
So it would solve the problem if you know some setting that takes min.order.qty from info record.
( ref: I am aware of planned del. time , there is one checkbox in plant parametes, if you select that , system will take planned del.time from info record , if you don't, system will take it from material master. So if you know any such setting for min.order.qty, pls let me know. I could not find any such possibilities)
Thanks

Free goods not reflecting in PO from Info Record

Hi,
My requirement is , when ever i order 100 qty from a vendor 10 qty should be delivered free of cost.
I am trying to maintain Info record for the same..
Now when i created PO for the same...I entered 100 qty..it is not reflecting 10 qty in another line in PO..
Where i am wrong?
Uts

HI,
Have maintained the values in
*Spro-Purchasing-Discount in kind-Define & assign discount in kind schema-Maintain free goods schema*
It will be available in standard SAP if not do the following configuration
Here
Usage -N
Application -M
create procedure NR0001
In control data
step-10
Cond Type-NR00
Then save.
Next
Define free good schema
Here assign ur schema grp of vendor
Then assign the procedure created previously (i-e) NR001 & THEN SAVE.
The above configuration is very important for the free goods scenario to work.
Then go to MM and in purchasing view and give the value 2.
Then in MBN1 create the condition record for the IR -0.
Then create the PO it will work definetly.
9884057038
murugan
Edited by: Murugan mgl on Jun 17, 2009 6:58 AM
Edited by: Murugan mgl on Jun 17, 2009 6:59 AM

Purchase Order is not Picking Price from Info Record.

Dear All,
User had created a Shopping cart in and an automatic Purchase Order is created which is picking the material price from Purchase Requisition but not from Created Inforecord. As checked in P.R at item level it is found that in VALUATION tab there is a field named as " P.O PRICE " , here defalt t selected as " 1 A Gross Price "., Can u please help that from where this field is automatically selected as Gross Price in Purchase requisition.
Thanx n Rgds,
sap11

This is the config done in the OMET transaction where you will see the Adopt PO price field is checked and now this funcitonal authorization code e.g. 01 assgined to user profile in SU3 transaction agianst the parameter EFB.
if this is active than it will not take price from info record but it will copy from PR.
to avoid this kind of issue -
Remove the EFB value in SU3 for particular user or if user needs to have the EFB profile for some other requirements than go to OMET and remove Adopt po price indicator from that profile which is assigned to user

SAP PUR: Purchase requisition getting valution from Info Record

Hi all,
I'm trying to see why SAP doesn't get the valuation from the Info Record when creating a PR.
I put the fixed vendor, it automatically determines the info record number, but it is not putting the value in the PR.
Is there any answer to this?

Hi
PR never pickes valuation price from info record. Valuation Price is internal and stocks are valuated at valuation price. If you fix a vendor in PR then that is used in PO for price. But valuation price will not be chnaged automatically. It is alwys copied from Material master. You can edit it. It is used for release procedure of PR and Price comparison between PO and PR valaution price.
Hope my answer helps u to understand.
Regards
Antony

Under and over delivery tolerance are not defaulted from Info record

Under and over delivery tolerance are not defaulted from Info record. Does purchasing value key in material master has precedence over info record.
What are the settings I have to check.
Thnaks and regards,
Suranjana

No, Info records has precedence on PO than material master
please check your info record and than verify the PO's plant and info record plant
you might have more than one inforecord per plant for same vendor and material.
so please check you have right value in right info record as per the PO vendor, mateiral and plant and Purchase org

Costing run with values for material from info record.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for