Cost upation of materials

Client has following requirement. As per the India replenishment process we have to place the order in 8 digit material to Singapore plant& receive the FG in India DC under 8 digit part #. Then India user has to move the stock from 8 digit part # to corresponding 7 digit part # in India DC plant to use that in sales order. Here the cost of 8digit material should be transferred to 7 digit material. 8digit material and 7 digit material has different unit of measure so the material to material transfer is not possible. Do we have any other option in this case?

Hello,
How the stock from 8 digit part # to corresponding 7 digit part # is happening??
What is tcode you are using and the movement type, if any.
With the given informaiton, I can tell you that, If you have Price control V in 7 digit part # material, the value of 8 digit part # material automatically flows to 7 digit part # material.
Thanks,
Santosh

Similar Messages

  • Costing run for materials with special procurement key

    Hello,
    Since moving to ECC6, the costing run for materials with special procurement keys is not pulling the marked price from the materials the special procurement keys point to. Only the released prices are pulled.
    Example:
    Material A, plant A has a future price (costing 2 tab) of 100 and a current price of 99
    Material A, plant B has special procurement key Z1 (costing 1 tab) which pulls the costing from Material A, plant A
    In our old system (46c) the costing run for Material A, plant B would pull 100.
    In ECC6, the costing run for Material A, plant B pulls 99
    Anyone that can push me in the right direction?

    Hi,
    Based on the info provided thus far, the result that you notice in ECC 6.0 is right as it is picking the current standard price based on your setup.
    Now why it is picking the future price in 4.6c, well for that you will have to do a detail check as in which variant is being used etc. I would suggest you to work with your CO personnel on this. Do a costing run for this particular material via CK11n using the variant which you mentioned & see the results.
    Or if you can upload the screenshots (picasaweb or some other portal) of the valuation variant you're using in 4.6c, along with Acctng view 1 & 2, costing view 1 & 2 details of the material it would help to have a better understanding.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • After BUDK costing run, 300 materials are open.

    After BUDK costing run, 300 materials are open . When clicked on the same it gave a dump.
    What may be the reason for which the materials are still open. How to identify them and
    take subsequent corrective action?

    Hi
    Refer  Note 1402978 - CK40N: Incorrect statistics after inconsistency corrrection
    This note has child Note 542790 - Inconsistency correction: Costing run statistics and others.. You should start with this note.. and then come to above note 1402978
    Regards
    Ajay M
    Edited by: Ajay Maheshwari on Nov 12, 2010 6:57 PM

  • Overhead costs on raw materials

    Our requirement is to have some percentage overhead on raw materials.  So I created a costing sheet and applied a percentage to them and did a std cost estimate. Now when GR is received it valuates against the std cost (which includes OH) and posts the difference to PPV. Client wants it to valuate against the orginal price of material (without OH)
    Ex;  ROH  Mat A $1.00 in planned price 1
           Costing sheet : 10% OH
    Standard cost of this ROH A is $1.10
    Purchase order will be at $1 so GR will post  Dr. Inv $1.10  Cr. Gr/Ir $1.00 PPV $ 0.10
    But clients want that PO price $1 to be valuated against $1 (true ROH cost) and post $0.10 to absorption account
    Dr. inv $1.10, Cr Gr/IR $1  Cr abs $0.10  
    if P.O is $1.10 then Dr. Inv $1.10 Cr. Gr/IR $1.10 Dr.PPV $0.10 Cr ABS $0.10
    I am not sure if it is even possible if not waht options do I have to have and overhead for Raw materials with out updating standard cost estimate with $1.10.
    Thanks

    Hi
    Yes, it is possible
    What you want is to Debit the inventory with 1.1 i.e. inclusive of Overhead.. But, Credit the GR/IR with 1 $ and post the 0.10 to absorption account instead of PPV... So, that PPV reflects true PPV
    You need to create an accrual key for the same..
    1. Create an accrual condition type and accrual account key in MM pricing procedure. In this way, there is a credit entry to the GL account represented by accrual account key. Hence the PPV represents the true value.
    2. For the accrual condition type, you can create a condition record such that its value is same as your overhead. You can use the user exit to automatically populate its value from KEKO and KEPH table.
    Refer this post where it was discussed a few days back
    Product Costing-Overhead inclusion in Inventory standard cost without PPV
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Cost of reagents (materials) used for QM inspection

    Hi,
    Could you please clarify the issue of managing reagents that were used for QM inspection?
    Reagent is set in the system as ROH material. The objective is to view the amount and the cost of reagents that were used for the inspection operation.
    There is a possibility to use QM order for the appraisal costs. But only time-related activities are taking into consideration there (for instance, n working hours of personal * rate).
    The question is how to manage costs of materials (reagents) that were used while inspection operation.
    Is there any possibility to carry out goods issue for the QM order?

    Thanks for your answer, Gajesh
    Though the movement type you proposed is not exactly what I was looking for, your answer lead me to goods issue in relation to QM-order. This is not possible with MB1A.
    I tried MIGO. I added the field "Order" to the tab "Account Assignment" through the OMJJ transaction for 201 movement type.
    And now it's possible to enter the QM order number while posting goods issue (reagents issue).
    The relative controlling document contains the QM order number.
    The only inconvenience left is the necessity to remember the QM-order number when posting the goods issue. Though the goal is achieved somehow.
    Regards,
       Salameja

  • Cost element for materials in network profile

    Dear All,
    Want to use material planning field in internal activity under assignment tab. But I have the following queries
    What is the cost element that I have to mention in network profile under internal activity?
    If I mention the cost element in network profile and plan my internal activity in initial stage and later on if I assign material to internal activity will the  Plan cost of that internal activity increases by the material added to that activity.
      3.  under OBYC materials have different cost elements based upon valuation class. so how the planned vs actuals will be show in the report.
    Regards
    Avinash

    Hi Avinash,
    See my replies below.
    1 a & B: You are planning Qty on NWA and capturing costs - labor & Equipment on NWA elements.
    When  you are having elaborated to NWA-Element level, split your total work on each NWA-element and post labor cost. Thus you will have planned Vs actual costs at one place.
    coming to equipment cost - are you capturing using PO through GR?.
    2.a : Option1- create a separate WBS elements for materials and plan cost at WBS level. That value would be your total planned cost of material procurement as estimated. Under this WBS elements create NWAs and assign the materials. With this set up you can assign material and procure so that will have actual costs coming from GR.
    Option 2: Create a one General Cost activity and assign the total planned cost of material on this NWA.
    When you assign the material components, diligently you have to reduce the equivalent amount from the general costs activity. Also note that on component screen, you have to check box "Cost relevant" so that material cost will add to Cost NWA. Let the different materials  have their own valuation class and have default CEs accordingly. that would not be big issue.
    Please discuss with your MM team to get more information. Also my suggestion is to leave blank CE field in configuration.
    The option2 is very cumbersome and high risk but one have to be very cautious to reduce the value from Cost NWA in order to sustain the planned material costs whenever they added.
    3. I have answered the relevance of Cost relevance check box in above.
    Hope above makes sense.
    Thanks,
    Sudhakar

  • Changeover Cost, Time and Materials

    What is the best method for capturing changeover costs in a discreet manufacturing setting where production orders are used? Depending on the sequence of products being produced cleanout times and the quantity of cleaning agent used can vary. This has an impact on planning and profitability, and should be accurately captured. 
    Is it best to create multiple routings one with and on without changeover time?
    Also, to capture the amt. of cleaning agent used, is it best to put that directly on the BOM?  The issue is that we don't know how much cleaning agent is used until after we have already posted production.  Is there a way to go back into the production order after posting production on the finished good and consume more material?

    Hi,
    Create production order without materials in transaction CO07.
    You can use reference operations sets for this. You can assign the components in the order directly. Create reference operation sets and call on the operation in the production order wo material.
    This cost can be captured on a cost center and distributed as per the requirement.
    thanks and regards
    Muru

  • No costing for intermediate materials

    We are running costing for a configured material.  When we cost the material in the sales order, the finished product is getting costed with values but the semi- and raw-materials for this finished good is not picking any values in the costing result.  Raw materials have already price in the material master.  In the cost component structure, we have ticked 'roll up cost component'.  We do not understand what is happening

    Hi
    Check if there is any error for the Sales Order cost estimate....
    If no prices are found as per Valuatin Variant, then system would issue some error message
    Check if all the prices exist as per Valuation Variant specified in SO Costing
    br, Ajay M

  • Capture cost of procured materials in a third party sales order scenario

    Dear Experts,
    I'm developing a third party sales order solution to my company following the recommended third party scenario by SAP.
    Everything is working fine from creation of sales order, automatic creation of purchase requisition, create purchase order using the purchase requisition ect...
    The problem I have is the in the Sales order, the cost of the material is not getting captured correctly. The condition maintained in the sales order is VPRS and it is deriving the material cost from the material master record. Ideally it should be deriving the material cost from the invoiced value or else from the purchase order(which is the actual amount we are spending to buy the items). Deriving the cost from material master depicts an incorrect profit in the sales order.
    Can someone please advice me how to derive the cost(to be shown in the sales order under VPRS condition)from the invoice or the purchase requisition and Not from the material master.
    I'll be grateful if you can describe in a step by step proceedure.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Lakshmipathi
    Thanks alot for your response.
    As u mentioned, at the point of sales order creation the price does gets picked up from the Material Master.
    But during Billing, it does NOT get updated to reflect the purchase order price. If that happens, then its perfect.
    I did a complete testing cycle and the material master price remains unchanged throught the process upto billing.
    Is there any special parameter that I should maintain in VPRS condition for this to happen?
    Anyway thanks again for ur reply, appreciate it alot. Let me know your views on this.
    As u advise I'll post it on the sales forum as well.
    Regards,
    Randika

  • Cost Capturing of Materials

    Dear friends,
    Can anybody clarify me reg. how we capture costs in Production/ Process Order:
    Direct material, activity and indirect material cost will settled against Order.
    Thanks inadvance.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi Srinivasa,
    Thank you for your kind and quick reply.
    kindly go through my concern:  How the cost settle when process or production order settled?
    Do we get info from Production order cost analysis like:
       Direct Material
       Direct Labour
       Indirect cost:
    If we want to get info like above what the necessary steps we need to do?
    Hope u figure out my concern, kindly do the needfull.
    Regards,
    Venkat

  • Costing run for materials

    Hi,
    We have product costing in our company (COPC). We have two production versions for one FG. Currently we have run the costing based on version 1. But from next month if I need to run the costing based on version 2, I need to know will it work if I save the cost estimate of version 2 from CK11N and run the costing from CK24? Will it update the cost of the FG for the next month based on version 2 ? If not please explain a way to do this.
    Many Thanks
    Oshani

    Hi Oshani,
    Yes. It should work. Just be sure you assign the Version 2 in CK11N (in the tab Qty Struct.).
    Check also that you version 2 is active (traffic light is green) in C223.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Mariano

  • Costing of Materials

    Hi all,
    Our company is uploading materials for testing. They are costing the materials that are uploaded. What does costing the materials mean here? What is the procedure for this costing?
    Thanks,
    Reena

    Hi Reena
    Just though of adding few more points regarding your query
    Material costing means costing for RM, SFG and FG - a broad definition used for all materials
    Now, Let's see how raw materials are costed
    1)  Costing of raw materials will depend on the price control maintained in MM master
    2)  If the price control is V, when u upload material balances - both qty and value are uploaded and the moving avg price - price control V is calculated automatically by sytem
    3)  Next is costing of FG and SFG.  To cost these, it depends on the valuation strategy defined and attached in costing variant
    4)  When u cost FG and SFG, prices are updated in standard price field - price control "S".  In majority of situations price control for FG and SFG are - S and for RM it is V
    5)  Now, let's come to the valuation strategies, if you cost FG and SFG, system will search for prices of materials list as per BOM and searches for prices in MM
    6)  Normally the valuation strategies considered for std cost estimate are
        Planned Price 1
        Standard Price
        Moving avg Price
    7)  The above strategy means you need to maintain Planned price 1 for RM to begin the costing process in the organization
    8)  When u run cost estimate or costing run for FG and SFG results of costing run are updated in standard price field on release of cost estimates
    Hope the above clarifies and is useful - Pls assign points

  • Materials -Planned & Actual Costs

    Hi ,
    Is there any report which can give me the Costs of the Materials
    Planned costs VS actual costs in form of a report.
    Currently we have it aggregated at the activity level can we get it at the material Level.
    regards,
    A S

    In PS cost collection can only happen at either the WBS or the network or network activity level. Material component do not collect cost, but cost of material is collected at the network activity level
    The cost of materila in basic tersm is the goods receipt or goods issue - this can be seen in the project line item treport CJI3

  • Free goods but want to freight cost updation upon GR

    Hi,
    Scenario:
    I have a PO with 20 line items and header freight cost.
    There are few more items in PO which are ticked as free goods.
    There is a stock of those materials with certain MAP.
    Freight condition has been configured as vendor GR so that it gets loaded on materials upon GR.
    Requirement is that
    Upon GR of this PO,MAPshould get updated with the freight cost for those materials also which have been marked as free goods.
    How this can be achieved ?
    Regards,
    manOO

    Hi Rang,
    Thanks for the feedback.However service PO is out of scope as client do not want to go for servicees.
    I could not understand your suggestion
    <u>you give PO to frieght vendor for freight value & in remarks you mention reciving as FREE GOODS from vendor xxxxx & do GR load cost to material & pay to freight vendor. (this is not advisible, but one solution for your problem).</u>
    I have to receive one material via purchase order as a free item but I need to pay vendor for the freight charges that will be incurred to ship this item along with all the other items in the same PO.
    Can you please explain me further as what you mean to say in your post.
    I should be able to load these freight cost on all the materials in PO including the material with 'free' indiactor.
    In short upon GR MAP should affect with freight cost as there will not be value addition of the material since received as free.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    manOO

  • Breakdown of  COGS into ACTUAL cost components

    Hello,
    I am looking to design a product cost report which gives breakdown of COGS into actual cost components. We use moving average cost for all materials (purchased as well as manufactured) in a make to order environment.
    For example:
    Sales order - Shipped material A at COGS $100.
    Process order # 1 produced material A using input material B and a series of operations defined in a recipe.
    Process order # 1 costs: Input material B - $70
    Operations cost - $30
    Process order # 2 produced material B using raw material C and a series of operations.
    Process order # 2 costs: Input material C - $40
    Operations cost - $30
    So, the results should look like COGS 100 comprise of $ 40 material cost and $ 60 operations cost.
    I understand standard cost estimates can be linked to CO-PA fields to get cost component structure. But, we don't use standard costing. We use CO-PA which gives COGS.
    Is there something similar to cost estimate to calculate as above? Or, this is a custom development.
    Thanks in advance for any pointers / advice?
    Sanjiv Agrawal

    What is COGS?

Maybe you are looking for