Materials -Planned & Actual Costs

Hi ,
Is there any report which can give me the Costs of the Materials
Planned costs VS actual costs in form of a report.
Currently we have it aggregated at the activity level can we get it at the material Level.
regards,
A S

In PS cost collection can only happen at either the WBS or the network or network activity level. Material component do not collect cost, but cost of material is collected at the network activity level
The cost of materila in basic tersm is the goods receipt or goods issue - this can be seen in the project line item treport CJI3

Similar Messages

Controlling of Plan & Actual Cost of Assets

Hi gurus
We want to monitor our Assets plan & actual cost . In other words. whenever Accounting document will create from Asset accounting. a Controlling document should be created . for monitoring Assets Plan & Actual Cost.
Please give Expert opnion. is this justified.
Thanks.

Hi James
Your requirement is justified... but it does not work the same way as for revenue expenses
1. You need to create the Asset recon account as Cost Element (Category 90)
2. Assign a Statistical Internal Order in the Asset master and enter the Budget in it. (KO22) or Enter a Plan value in KPF6.. This would serve as the Plan expense of asset
3. When you receive the asset, it would also trigger a posting in the Internal Order... This would serve as the Actual expense on account of asset
Now, when you execute the report for Internal order, it would give you PLan Cost cost of Internal Order vs Actual Cost...
BR,Ajay M

How can I crosscheck Total Planned/Actual Cost in MCI3 (S061) correct?

Hi Masters,
I want to crosscheck "Total Planned Cost" and "total Actual Cost" in MCI3(S061) - Location and Planning analysis is correct or not.'
In my current system I am trying to compare the Orders in IW39 and MCI3 but costs are not matching.
I have done some analysis and found that the costs are updated in S061 from PMCO.
But for same Orders in months e.g August I am getting posting for July,August and Semptember.
So I am not sure how I can compare the values of "Total Planned Cost " and Total Actual Cost" in S061 to IW39.
If it is possible to compare what selection criteria I should use for fetcing the Orders from AUFK or IW39. Which dates are I should used ( Date range - Period, Basic start/end dates, Actual start/End Dates).
With Best Regards,
Narendra dere
SAP- Manufacturing.

Hello,
Comparing the MCI3 & IW39 cost figures is not right as per my knowledge.
S061-->following below logic for calculations for Actual Cost and Planned Cost
Total planned costs for PM measures
Sum of planning costs for PM measures
This key figure will be updated when a PM order with a time reference is created and changed at the starting date of the posting period, in which the costs were created.
Total of the actual costs for PM measures
This key figure is updated with every cost-relevant transaction for a PM order (for example, completion confirmation, material withdrawal) for the beginning date of the posting period, in which the costs were created. For historical orders, the key figure is updated when creating and changing a historical order with a time reference to the starting date of the posting period which was determined for the reference date of the order.
Total of actual costs for companyu2019s own material for PM measures
This key figure is updated for every cost-relevant operation for a maintenance order (for example, time confirmation, material withdrawal).
For historical orders, the key figure is updated when creating and changing a historical order with a time reference to the starting date of the posting period which was determined for the reference date of the order. The key figure update is important from a business point of view only when a material removal is made.
Total of actual costs for external material for PM measures
This key figure is updated with every cost-relevant transaction for a PM order (for example, completion confirmation, material withdrawal) for the beginning date of the posting period, in which the costs were created.
Regards,
Rakesh

Plan/Actual cost for Deleted Material - reg

Hello,
Actually iam assigning one BOM to activicity.
Now i have released the project,after this in cns41 plan and actual costs r flowing correctly.
Now i have deleted that BOM from activity and saved the project also,
now again in cns41 the same BOM cost was flowing in Planded data,
pls give solution for this....
--Prakash.

Hi Manish,
Thanks for ur support,
but iam getting this error message,
Typ Ite Message text                                                           LTxt
    000 The project info database reconstruction starts with: 1 Projects
    000 Processing is complete
<b>   000 No value category could be determined for cost element 1000 50200000</b>
this error was coming thg cjen
--Prakash

Planned /actual cost report in iw31

Hi Gurus
Is there any method to see individual component cost while creating order (IW31) in pm. I tried with planned/cost report button on the cost tab by including material and material text in the layout, but when I execute the material and text is blank and I am unable to see individual material wise cost.
Kindly help.
Regards
Vidhyadharan

Yes it a business requirement.
while creating reservation, the user should be aware that he is drawing a high value item.
for eg. One of the component of the Assembly has failed, and it has to be replaced, the stores does not have the stock, it takes time for that component to get reparied, since it is time consuming,and the production been affected, the engg replaces the entire assembly by drawing from the stores. Since the engg does not know the cost, he should be made aware that he is drawing a high value item from the stores , which he has to take an oral approval from the higher authority.
Regards
Vidhyadharan

PS - Report on Planned v/s actual cost of the project

Hi,
I have a client requirement on the above subject. In Report S_ALR_87013542, Under actual cost the system is taking both the Revenue and Actual cost booked on the project. Is there any other report wherein the system shows only the actual cost booked on the project so that planned V/s Actual can be compared.
Rgds,
Prasad

Hi,
You can also refer the report S_ALR_87013543 - Actual/Plan/Variance Absolute/Variance %. This will give the reports based on cost elements. Morever plan cost Vs actual cost can be obtained from Project Infosystem report (CN41/ CNS41).
In fact the report S_ALR_87013533 is a hiecherachical report for plan & actual cost of project.
If the system is calculating wrongly both revenue & actual cost under actual then you need to check Cost elements asignments & value category details.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Rakesh Pradhan

Break Up of Actual Costs in a report for list of orders

Hi All,
SAP standard reports displays only the total planned & total actual costs.
Is there any standard report available which can display break up of planned & actual costs along with total costs, for list of orders (e.g: time, material and external resources consumption).
Thanks in advance
JK

hi
you can find the material cost,external service etc in the standard cost report itself select the change layout and select the items you want to display ,you can get the result
regards
thyagarajan

Getting diffrent Actual cost from 0PM_OM_OPA_2 to 0pm_c01 and 0pm_c07

Hi All,
I am using BI report for plan and actual cost deviation of Work order(maintenance order) of PM(tcode iw33>cost tab>plan actual cost to check),
question there is 2 query for this plan actual cost deviation, one on 0pm_c01(Maintenance Orders - Costs and Allocations) and second on 0PM_C07 Maintenance Orders: Scheduling, datasource is common 0PM_OM_OPA_2 for actual cost population in this cubes, BUT update rule are diffrent for both target,
in 0pm_c07 its getting update by 0pm_ds04(dso) where we are getting only Actual cost with Debit(S) Entery(as debit(S) entery hardcoded at start routine in update rule from this datsource to 0pm_ds04), for report on 0pm_c07actual cost is matching with standard ecc report MCI8 - PMIS: Cost Analysis.
in 0pm_c03 we are getting all Actual cost entry both Debit(S) and Credit(H), getting actual cost total as debit minus credit entry at cube 0pm_c03 and hence getting same on report on that, this report is same as like report on 0pm_c07.
both report are calculating Actual vs Plan cost relation ship, but one report(on 0pm_c07) have only debit(S) entry while other report(on 0pm_c03) have both Debit and Credit entery, So getting diffrent Actual cost at both report hence diffrent Actual VS plan Cost relationship from both report,
Both are standard report given by SAP, Now which report we have to take it as correct one? which report is right?
Regards,
Dushyant.

Hi,
Sorry, In my pain post whereever i written 0pm_c03 is wong its 0pm_c01,
as u said ur query on 0pm_c01 works fine? are u getting Debit(S) and credit(H) both entery for actual cost in this cube?
as in 0pm_c07 we are gettin only debit(S) entery and this report matching with standard ecc reprot( as i mentioned in main post ) BUT for 0pm_c01 its have both S and H entery. if ur actual/plan cost report on 0pm_c01 have S and H entery for actual cost than with ECC report you are reconciling?
Dushyant.

Actual cost are not posted

Hi all,
I am doing Purchase Order against project for service,assigning WBS Element in it,
and doing service entry sheet against that P.O.
But I am not getting plan & actual cost reflected in Project builder & reports.
Is there any setting for getting Plan & Actual cost ?

Have you accepted the service entry done? Actual Costs wouldn't appear unless you accept the service entry.
If you haven't done planning (T Codes CJR2 or CJ40), Plan costs wouldn't appear on the WBS.
You should be able to see commitments on the reports if you have the configuration settings for commitments.
Regards
Sreenivas

Difference between Actual Cost and Allocable costs in splitting KSS2

I have Cost splitting structure results with me(KSS2)
What is the difference between Actual Costs, Control Costs, Allocable Actual, Actual cost balance and which amount will system consider for calculating the rate with dividing the activity rates.

Hi,
In Splitting Structure KSS2 There are two Costs One is Target Cost (Planned) and Control Cost (Actual Cost)
In Variance Calculation U will See Target Cost (Planned), Actual Cost, Allocated Actual Costs.
Target Cost = Planned Cost
Control Cost = Actual Cost
Actual Cost = Actual Cost
Allocated Actual Cost = Actual Cost of the Output Qty. This is Actual Credits from Activity allocation. This is Actual Credits from delivery of Stock.
Hope you are Clear.

Plan cost & Actual cost in KKBC_ORD for CO Prdn Order

Dear Experts,
We are not able to findout the why difference is appearing during T code KKBC_ORD order analyse for Raw materials, please suggest wht may be the wrong thing in the order?
Before this i would like to brief you on the process.
Raw matls are created with "V" as price control. & Finished Goods as "S" control.& we create one BOM. Say example
My finished Goods will be 500555 code & Raw matl code will say 1001010 & 1002020.
My BOM will contain these raw matls with qty of 1kg each.
FG code 500555 of 2kg Bag
Items are 1001010 & 1002020 of 1kg each.
Here my mvng price are 2 & 4Rs for raw mtls 1001010 & 1002020 respectively.
In Material master we define overhead key as 10% to a Finished goods (500555) in Costing view.
1) Now i create a Base planning object T code KKE1 & I update the 10% as overhead cost & raw matls qtys as per BOM.At the end you can see the overall manufacture cost of the FGs in this case you will get for
FG 500555 about 6.6Rs. then save it.here it is done for 1bag only.
2) Create a CO PRDOUCTION ORDER T code KKF1 system will generate one number & save it. Now go to KKF4 add the base planning object name & enter the required qty say 10 bags...
You can see the COGM will now 66Rs for 10 bags as per the planning.
3)Goods issued to Order 261 with refc to BOM & Order number entred qty as 10. Sytem will calculates the qtys of raw mtals based on 10bags & save it.
4)Goods receipt done against CO PRDOUCTION ORDER (Finished goods 500555).
*5)KKBC_ORD i hav updated the CO PRDOUCTION ORDER & choosen cost trend. Here i am seeing a diffc in actual cost column & variance of 26%.but how it is possible*
Regards
TG

I can think of a couple of areas where there may be differences.
First, your CO order is probably not getting any overhead costs. Your base planning object had 10% overhead built into it, but that is only for developing the preliminary cost estimate for the order. The allocation of actual overhead must occur through some other method (i.e. overhead costing sheet, activity allocation, or template allocation).
Second, the actual material costs assigned to the order will be based on the material's inventory valuation at the time they are issued to the order. Since you said the materials are valuated at weighted average cost, it is possible that their inventory valuation changed between the time the base planning object was created and the time they were issued to the order.
thanks,

Actual / Planned / Target Cost and Quantity

Hi Experts,
In the company that I am working there is the need of having a report with the following information:
Plan Cost, Actual Cost, Target Cost, Planned Quantity, Actual Quantity for diferent materials using the cost component split structure or with the different accounts.
Can anyone helpme with this need?
Regards
Edited by: DAG123 on Jun 30, 2011 2:59 PM

Hi
COSP: For External Postings (Target/Plan/Actual)
COSS: For Internal Postings (Target/Plan/Actual)
COSPD (Actual only): Settlement entries i.e. GR and GI upon confirmation, for Primary cost elements
COSSD (Actual only): Settlment entries i.e. activity confirmation
Target/Plan/Actual is differentiated by a separate indicator
br, Ajay M

0CO_PC_01 Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data

Hi Experts
I have a question regarding Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data (0CO_PC_01). I know nothing about the R/3 processes and tcodes behind this datasource.
For a given material and a given plant do I only get records with VTYPE(Value type for Reporting) 10, but I do not understand why - I need VTYPE = 70.
I therefore hope:
1. That somebody could provides input on why I only get VTYPE = 10 and how I get 70 instead.
2. That somebody can tell me the tcodes behind this datasource on the R/3 side.
Thanks and kind regards,
Torben

Hi Mr. V.
Thanks a lot for the input.
The problem is that we have got VTYPE 30 (target) for some materials, but not for specific material A and we really do not understand why. Do you know how I can verify if the variance is present for the given material A in R/3?
Thanks and kind regards,
Torben
Edited by: Torben Pedersen on Apr 3, 2009 12:00 AM
Sorry, it is VTYPE 30 i need, not 70 as stated by mistake at first.

PS (plan vs actual costs) Report

Hi,
I have to generate the above report. How can I diffrentiate between Plan cost and actual cost. Is there any business contect report for this ? can anybody throw light on this.
Regards,
Bill

Hi Bill,
There is no std content for this as far as I know , Not sure if your report is based on cost for a given version then its really a mystery . If you are looking to pull the cost for PS then check the table RPSCO in r3 , this is the PS cost table , and you can differentiate Plan/Actual based on the Field Value type .
hope this helps ,

Planned vs Actual Cost Report (with variance) for PM Orders

Hi Experts,
We are using the project system to collate order costs for annual shut work. We have a requirement for a report to show 25% variance between planned and actual order costs (maintneance order).
At this stage, we dont mind whether this is implemented in the the PM system, or the PS system.
This is a fairly basic / common requirment. Are there any standard transactions we could use to:
1. Select a list of orders using standard selection criteria.
2. Select a % for variance, e.g. 25%
3. Display a list of orders where the planned vs actual costs were greater than 25% and what the actual variance is for each order?
Thanks,
Maikel

Hi Maikel,
I have never seen any such scenario, but the best thing that can come to me is for the shut down activities you muct have created a Revision, then based on that Revision you can take a dump of all the orders with Planned and Actual Cost, in the excel, and there by putting the formulae you can definitely have the Varience report.
Hope it helps you.
Regards,
Yawar Khan

Materials -Planned & Actual Costs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for