Costing Run If RM has zero value

Dear Friends,
My client is going to get Raw material from parent compnay on free of cost. Now that mateial has 0 price. This material is the part of production of finished good.
Now If I run cost estimate or costing run then system is giving error message "" No price could be determined for material/batch xxxxxxxx"".
How I can do this thing that free of cost raw material (has std./MAP=0) should be the part of bom and cost estimate/costing run can be run sucessfully for finished goods.
If with zero value it is not possible then how I can do , please sugget if possible by some setting in PP/CO.
Thanks
Ravi

Dear Ravi,
Check with this steps.
1.Either set the check box for do not cost in the costing 1 view for that material in the material master.
2.If this is not working means,you can remove the costing relevancy indicator for that material in the BOM,just double click on
the item number of that particular material whose value is zero and you can find this field under the status/long text tab page.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Similar Messages

Costing run activity one materieal is value double another materieal corec

Dear gurus,
we run costing run in 20 materieal code insted of 20 materieal one materieal is showing double value remaining materieal is showing perfect.
we chacked BOM and routing in workcenter which is same for all materieal codes,
please replay as soon as posible i want release materieal cost.
Thank you!
Regards,
Pradheep.

Hi,
see product cost estimates is calculated using cnsumption qty mention in BOM multiplied by the price maintained in the material master + std direct activity qty mentioned in workcenter/routing and indirect activities related cost center multiplied by the activity rate maintained in KP26.
Now i am amazed that how could be BOM / ROUTING can be same for all the material, if this is the case means all the material and its cost will come as same if there is no difference in indirect activity qty and rate.
So plz check the BOM Components there might be double std qty entered for the consumption else there would be the line repetion for the qty. U can also check for the direct activity qty and activity calculation formula.
Regards / Ashok verma

Hyper-V Hypervisor Virtual Processor\\% Guest Run Time occasionally has bad values

I'm accessing PerfMon data via RegQueryValueExW () calls in a C++ program to collect a variety of metrics. I've noticed that
Hyper-V Hypervisor Virtual Processor\\% Guest Run Time occasionally contains incorrect values, as shown both in my collected code as well as in PerfMon. (Also % Total Run Time, and possibly all the metrics.)
My test environment is running 2008 r2 standard, service pack 1, on an Intel Zeon CPU (if it's relevant), and is hosting four guests, none very active (_total = .449, the rest = .030, .513, .185, .194, .341).
The problem is that occasionally the first, least active, guest will spike well above 100% (as an example, 6300%).
When walking through my code, the issue seems to coincide with the order of the subscripts being returned from RegQueryValueExW () changing, where the first, least active subscript moving to the second location, and getting an unexpected value. When it returns
to the first spot in the series on a subsequent call it once again has an expected value. Oddly enough the new "first array element" has the expected value even after the shift.
Actual returned values for a 30 second collection cycle, values are shifted by 1000:
GuestRunTime[hyper-vtest_0]; current = 1211813.198, previously = 1211804.192
GuestRunTime[win2k3EntR2_-_prometheus_3]; current = 18401087.260, previously = 18400964.194
(interval)
GuestRunTime[hyper-vtest_0]; current = 1211822.625, previously = 1211813.198
GuestRunTime[win2k3EntR2_-_prometheus_3]; current = 18401201.918, previously = 18401087.260
(interval, and then the array order changes)
GuestRunTime[win2k3EntR2_-_prometheus_3]; current = 18401327.210, previously = 18401201.918
GuestRunTime[hyper-vtest_0]; current = 601735.139, previously = 1211822.625
(interval, and then the array order changes back)
GuestRunTime[hyper-vtest_0]; current = 1211841.390, previously = 601735.139
GuestRunTime[win2k3EntR2_-_prometheus_3]; current = 18401472.446, previously = 18401327.210
(interval)
GuestRunTime[hyper-vtest_0]; current = 1211850.605, previously = 1211841.390
GuestRunTime[win2k3EntR2_-_prometheus_3]; current = 18401577.243, previously = 18401472.446
As you can see, the value supplied when the array shifts is rather wonky, but returns to an expected value after the array shifts back: 1211813.198 -> 1211822.625 -> 601735.139 (?) -> 1211841.390 -> 1211850.605.

Thanks Deepak for your response.
1) Firewall is turned off
2) Below is the output from R3trans -d command:
C:\Windows\system32>r3trans -d
This is r3trans version 6.24 (release 741 - 04.02.14 - 20:14:02 ).
unicode enabled version
2EETW169 no connect possible: "DBMS = SYBASE --- "
r3trans finished (0012).
3) The latest dbsl patch that I see on SMP is indeed 35 (Our Kernel is 7.41 64-bit Unicode)

Non zero values in the extraction of the planning area

In our DP implementation we have been trying to extract 2 key figures from the planning area, one of the key figures might have zero values, when we set the indicator for the non zero values then it only eliminates the records for which both the key figure are zero but that is not what I want. I am trying to have a setting in the data source where we can reject the records even if one of the key figure has zero values.
Are there any settings for that while we are generating the data source.
Thanks in advance

Hi Colin,
This can be easily solved using a slightly different ABAP routine. You can assign the fields that you need to check into other field symbols and then check the value of those field symbols.
Here's one possible solution. I based in from the ABAP code you posted.
field-symbols: <LS_EXTR_BLOCK> TYPE any,
                     <ls_fcst> type any,
                     <ls_hist> type any.
data: w_pos type sy-tabix.
loop at ct_data assigning <LS_EXTR_BLOCK>.
w_pos = sy-tabix.
assign component '/BI0/9AVCORFCST'
   of STRUCTURE <LS_EXTR_BLOCK> to <ls_fcst>.
assign component '/BI0/9AVCORHIST'
   of STRUCTURE <LS_EXTR_BLOCK> to <ls_hist>.
if <ls_fcst> = 0 and <ls_hist> = 0.
delete ct_data index w_pos.
endif.
endloop.
Aside from the solution above, you can also define the structure of CT_DATA (that's basically the structure of the extract structure of your datasource). You can then assign the contents of CT_DATA to a field-symbol and the delete data using that field symbol.
Here's an example:
TYPES:
TY_DATA_TABLE type table of *PUT THE NAME OF YOUR EXTRACT STRUCTURE HERE*.
field-symbols:
<FS_DATA_TABLE> type TY_DATA_TABLE.
DELETE <FS_DATA_TABLE> WHERE /bi0/9avcorfcst = 0
and /bi0/9avcorhist = 0.
You can check the name of the extract structure by viewing table /SAPAPO/TSAREAEX field EXPORT_STRU. You can also see the name of the extract structure in debug mode by looking at the value of the parameter IV_DDIC_REFERENCE.
Hope this helps

Costing run for MRP-MPN set

Hai,
I am using MPN concept in my process.
Here I am getting one problem while going for Costing Run.
1. In BOM component for FERT is maintained as leading part. on which there is no Inventory maintained or no value for this material in Material Master so in costing run it is taking that value.
2. How costing run consider the MPN materials for Costing.
Thank & regards
KM

Hi,
Normally while creating the material master, we will maintain some approximate value in the accounting view. Then later while running the cost estimation, it will explode the BOM, routing it will calculate the BOM item component costs and the activity costs and the same it will update in the costing 2 view. This is the concept of standard cost estimation.
MPN material is the manufacturer part no. While procuring the component or while supplying the components to the supplier we need to supply the material as per their material no we need to supply them or procure them. But for our easy handling or to follow our own system we will me maintain the different material no. This 2 things we need to link MPN profile and the MPN material no. When u order your own material, the system in turn will create a purchase order with the vendor material no. This is the MPN material logic.
regards,
V. Suresh

Limit SC showing Zero value in report SC per cost centre in SRM portal

Hi SRM Gurus,
On executing SC per cost centre report avaialble in SRM 5.0 Portal I am getting value of limit SC as zero. while in all other follow on documents i.e. PO and Invoice its displaying the value.
Is it due to the fact the for Limit Items we don't have any GR/confirmation i.e zero quantity? and the value column field has Sigma symbol on it. so maybe it is multiplying quantity with the value here?
Is this SAP SRM standard for limit items to show zero value in this report ?
Please let me know. Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Varun Dhawan.

SRM experts please help in this regard. Any insights on LIMIT Shopping carts??

Copa assessment from cost center posted with zero values

Hello all,
We are running for the first time in my clients system assessment cycle for actual values from cost center t copa
The cycle at the test run shows the values and the reciever tracing factor allright but in update run the document created with zero values
Can anyone adress me why this happnes
Thanks
Michal

Hi,
You must be getting some errors in update run, like profit center update (if new gl active) or other, please check and revert.
Br

Costing run with values for material from info record.

Hi All
there is requirement with my client, that when i run my costing run the values of the components in BOM should be from the latest purchase order.
For this i am maintined valuation criteria as price from info record and sub strategy as gross price from PO.
When i am create a PO the info record is created automatically in background. So when i run costing run the value is picked correctly.
Now when i create a PO with same material from diff vendor the info record is generated, but on costing run it picks the value from the info record of earlier vendor. For this i go and check the conditions tab in info record, ensure its balnk and save it. Again generate new PO and then run a costing run. This time the system reads the latest info record.
My problem is that i want to ensure that during the costing run, system should read the latest info record w/o manual intervention. System behaviour is not consistent when there is multiple vendor and same material info records. Sometimes it pick up the value and sometimes it refers the old info record.
Can any one help me out in resolving this issue. Its critical.
Regards
Rakesh

Hi!
Generally first info records will be created with vendor, then PO will be created, based on info records price, price will be updated in PO.
If you have more than one vendor for same material, you have to create info records for each vendor. then you need to maintain source list, where you can fix the vendor. If there is no fix vendor, then you can do schedule agreement with vendors, where you have to give proportionate percentages again each vendor.
Now for costing run :
1. if you have only one info record, the price will take from that info record.
2. if you have more than one info record, you need to mantain source list, where you can tick the fixed vendor, then system will take price from that vendor info record.
3. if there is no fixed vendor and you have maintained scehduel agreement with weightage to vendor, then higher percentage vendor info record price will be picked up.
4. if you have more info reocrds, not maintianed source list or schedule agreement, price will be picked up from first info record ( based on info record creation date).
5. if you have a schedule agreement, but you have given equal weightage for example 50% and 50%, then also system will pick up from first info record.
i think it is clear now.
regs,
ramesh b

How to unlock ipad with voice over?I even entered my correct password byt the voice over kept on saying it's wrong? 0409 is my password how come its wrong.. and the voice over kept on saying zero has no value?

how to unlock ipad with voice over and password? i already entered my correct password the voice over kept on saying its wrong..my password is 0409.. and the voive over says"zero" has no value?

Turn off VoiceOver
1. Press the Home button
2. Tap Settings.
3. Then double-tap Settings.
4. Tap General.
5. Then double-tap General.
6. Use three fingers on the screen to scroll to Accessibility
7. Tap Accessibility.
8. Then double-tap Accessibility
9. Tap VoiceOver
10. Then double-tap VoiceOver.
11. Tap "On" next to VoiceOver
12. Then double-tap "On" to turn it off.

Error in the Transaction CK64 - Costing Run (CK 318 and CK 361)

Hi Everybody,
Please, when I use the transaction CK64 to costing run, i see the following message of error:
1) First Error: CK 318
CK 318 - Cost estimate for material & contains errors -> Planned price
CAUSE
When an assembly was valuated, the system found that the cost component
split of material component &V1& from plant &V2& contains errors.
SYSTEM_RESPONSE
The cost component split with errors is not changed. Instead,
valuation is carried out with a price from the material master. This
result goes into the cost rollup. This happens so that the costing
result of the finished product is still meaningful.
</>Note</> The subsequent valuation is always with valuation variant
&V3&. Valuations with a manual cost component split are not taken
into account. This affects the following two cases:
strategy '8': valuation with manual cost component split
the possibility to calcualte manual cost component splits in addition
to the valuation strategy entered.
WHAT_TO_DO
Analyze the cost component split with errors and solve them.
Where can I found the "cost component split"? Would be a information of Data master material (MM03)?
2) Second Error: CK 361
Value of costing item & in itemization is 0
CAUSE
The cost estimate for the assembly contains item &V2&, which has no
errors, but was costed with a value of zero.
WHAT_TO_DO
Please check item &V1& in the itemization of the assembly concerned.
Where can i found this information of itemization??? I was looking in the data master of the material but i can't find.
Please, how can I solve this problems?
The status of the costing run for this materials is "KF - Costed with errors"

Thank you Rob. I guess our only option is to call each steps of CK40N by separate transactions. Do you know why when calling CK64 (costing) in background, the transaction in BDC will automatically change to CK40N even CK64 is hard-coded?
Thank you very much for your advice.
Minami

Error during costing run(CK40n)

Dears
During costing run (ck40n),we got following errors,
1)Consumption account cannot be determined
2)Costing items for material R150 in plant EZP1 without cost element
3)Cost component split costed with value of Zero.
Can anyone tell what rectification has to be done ?
Regards
Akshay

1)Consumption account cannot be determined - Please see that consumption GL account for the raw material valuation class is assigned in OBYC..
If you doub le click on the message it gives the combination of
transaction/Controlling area/Valuation class/account modifier... for which you need to assign a consumotion account in transaction OBYC.
2)Costing items for material R150 in plant EZP1 without cost element - Please doubkle click on give the description of the message...this may be due to one of the primery cost element is not created as GL a/c or visaversa.
3)Cost component split costed with value of Zero.--if you solve the above this message will disapper.
pl come back

Costing run in PP

Dear all,
I am new to costing run,by using previous forum from the expert of kumar and rupesh i have studied the costing run process
From my understanding
1) For FG/SFG materials with quantity structure to be maintained in material master.
2) Relevant BOM and routing should be maintained for FG/SFGmaterials.
3) In work center proper cost center and activity type to be maintained
4 )what are the activity type is maintaining in work center for that price to be determined in KP26 for valid time period.
5) By using CK11N running the standard cost estimate and save
6)By using ck24 marking and release the price of the material.
7)Now checking in material master costing view 2 planned prices values has updated.
In above points kindly please correct me if i am wrong.
Regarding doubts
For example;1)I am maintaining fixed prices as 102 in material master,what will be in COGM & COGS cost value?(if cost lot size 1 & 100)
2)What will the price value in costing 2 view once after marking & releasing the price in ck24?
3)I have mainatined labour price in kp26 but tha cost values its coming as zero?
Kindly please let me clarify on this
Regards
Rajasekaran

Dear Muralidhar,
The flow path for Costing Run is
SAP Menu
- Production
- Product Cost Planning
- Material costing
- Costing Run - CK40N
Or else
SAP Menu
- Production
- Product Cost Planning
- Material costing
- Cost Estimate with Quantity Structure
- CK11N - Create.
I hope your question is answered.
If satisfied rewards suitable points and close the thread as asnwered.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Zero values not taken into account during retraction

Hello,
we are having an issue with data retraction.
When we reset a value to zero, the change in the value is not taken into account and the corresponding value in R/3 remains unchanged.
There are some posts that say that the function modules UPR_COST_PLAN_EXEC and UPR_COST_PLAN_INIT should be modified in order to populate <xth_data> with zero values, but debug mode shows that the data are read before calling these functions, and the zero values are
already ignored at this stage.
Could anyone help me, please?
Thank you in advance!

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

Zero value posting

Hi SAP Gurus,
User had done GR document w.r t PO in 2005 year, by the time payment has made to vendor manually without posting any IR documents. Based on GR accknowledgement copies corporate office done the payment to vendor. Now(2009) it is showing as open GR/IR report, thatswhat user want to close the GR/IR account. For that reason user posting the IR document with zero value for total quantity, by the time user getting error is "moving average price is negative for material".
Please suggest me how to do the zero value posting.

Hi
Instead of posting IV with zero value you can run MR11 for this purchase order as invoice is paid as offline.
Thanks

Costing Run Error

Hi All,
I am currently trying to roll cost for materials but have an error that i can not seem to resolve, i hope someone can assist me and help me understand.
While rolling the cost for a specific material the MFG Overhead cost is not being calculated correctly, i have looked at the routings for this material and do see where the error might stem from, but i do not think it can be corrected from there.
The error is that in the routing the cost for MFG Overhead is calculated by adding Labour (1H) and Setup (0.017) and MFG Overhead = 1.017. The lot size of this material is 300 but when roll up the cost with CK11N per unit the Set up value is 0.003 but the MFG Overhead does not calculate in the same fashion it remains as 1.017 (it should be 1.017/300 = 0.0033 ) This is causing a massive discrepancy in costing. Now one solution is that the amount can be corrected externally and then update the routing and run the costing, but there will be an issue if the lot size is increased in the future (instead of 300 the lot size is increased to 400, now the routing will have to be change to 1.017/400 = 0.0025). How can i correct the logic within SAP? I have tried configuring the costing sheet, but i am not not sure where to change it. In my costing run i am using costing variant PPC1.
I have tried being as detailed as possible, and i hope it is coherent.
I would really appreciate you help and points will be awarded.
Thanks in advance

Hi Althea,
Thank you for your response.
In the routing we have removed the MFG Overhead and now are using the Costing Sheet to calculate the Overhead. I think i have updated everything, eg costing sheet, costing sheet components, percentage overhead rates, costing variants. But now the requirement has changed again!!!! Just when you think you have crawled your way out of a ditch, someone pulls you back in.
In the legacy system they were able to calculate overhead in relation to cost centers ( Setup, Labor and Overhead for 403, Setup, Labor and Overhead for 403B and for 407 etc), but in the costing sheet you can only enter one cost center, is it possible to enter multiple cost centers and where would i do that?
Now i had a cost element for Overhead, but in the cost element category was incorrectly selected as 43 (Internal activity allocation) instead of 41 (Overhead rates) now when i am trying to use select that Cost Element in the Costing Sheet under the credit area it will not allow me to save it. I have created a new cost element but i am not certain what the impact might be
Please help!!!
Thanks in advance

Costing Run If RM has zero value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for