Counter Error -10609 "transferInProgError"

I am trying to use a Quadrature Encoder VI (found on ni.com and included below) to simulate wheel speed sensors. However, when I integrate this VI into my program on a PXI-6713 card, I receive the -10609 transfer in progress error. The problem occurs when I move from Park (encoder paused) to any movement speed. I have also been able to generate the same error in the Encoder VI just by moving the knob fast. My guess is that it is trying to update the new frequencies too fast, but I don't know how to solve that. I have the settings for it at Rev/sec and set for 1 pulse/rev. In modifying the quadrature VI to my program, the loop wait time has been changed from 90 to 100 ms, but that shouldn't be a factor.
Attachments:
Quadrature_Encoder_Simulator.llb ‏483 KB

Hello,
This is strange. I tried to run the VI and could not face any problem. But of course I had an E series card available with me. If you have an E series card could you please try to see if you get the error? I will try to check out a 6713 and try to run there too.
But my guess is, there might have been some other counter operation with the same counter going on when you ran this qudrature encoder VI. Just a thought. Double checking might be helpful.
Sincerely,
Sastry V.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Similar Messages

My DAQ program uses Traditional NI-DAQ in Visual C++ 6.0. I get error-10609 at SCAN_Start when run

My data acquisition program uses Traditional NI-DAQ in Visual C++ 6.0. When I run the program, I get error -10609 at the SCAN_Start that states
A transfer is already in progress for the specified resource, or the operation is not allowed because the device is in the process of performing transfers, possibly with different resources.
Why do I receive this error?

Hi,
TThe error -10609 can result from several situations in which the device's resources are already in use.
A Measurement & Automation (MAX) test panel is already open.
If you open a test panel window for your device and attempt to run your application, you can get this error. If this is the case, close the MAX test panel.
An AI Clear function was not used at the end of the previous acquisition.
If you do not call the AI Clear function after performing your acquisition, the resources remain open. Be sure to call this function, inputting your taskID, at the end of the acquisition.
Multiple programs are accessing the device.
If you have multiple VIs accessing the device, or perhaps a LabVIEW VI and another application, the resource will be taken and you will receive the error. You can only run one application accessing the specific resource (for example, analog input on channel 0) at a time
I hope this helps...and have a Great Day!
George

Error -10609 occured at AI Control

Recently we have been getting the following error message when trying to run 5 of our programs all at once.
"Error -10609 occured at AI Control
NI-DAQLV: A transfer is already in progress for the
specific resource, or the operation is not allowed
because the device is in the process of performing
transfers, possibly with different resources."
I believe that this error is coming from the AI Control.vi which is on of the subVIs of AI aquire waveform.vi. We have been using the AI aquire waveform.vi to read our thermocouples from the DAQ board and in the past have had no problems running multiple programs (with multiple thermocouples) using LabVIEW 6.0. When we switched to using the Executables that we created using LabVIEW
6.1 on another computer we started running into this problem. The development computer is a sony VAIO 1.6GHz P4 with 128 MB Ram, the operating computer is a Dell OptiPlex P1 of unknown processor speed with 64 MB of Ram.
If you have any ideas on how to fix this problem I would greatly appreciate it. Also, we are running the NI-DAQ 6.3.9 version and a PCI-MIO-16E-4 DAQ board.

Filipe,
Thank you for your response. One of NI's field engineers contacted me about this problem and I think that we have it solved. I am now using the Semaphore commands to control access to the DAQ board so that only one program can access it at one time.
Thank you for your help. If I can figure out how to add all tasks to one code then I will try that. The current problem with that is that not all tasks are always needed.
Thank you,
Timothy

Commit error while transferring Sales order Document to GTS

Hello,
We faced a transfer error while transferring sales order document to GTS.
When I debugged the code function /SAPSLL/API_6800_SYNCH is called. In this function, /SAPSLL/CUHD_MAINTAIN_SINGLE is called with parameter lv_no_commit = 'X'. When I checked why its value is 'X', I saw that if the RFC destination and the current system are the same, then lv_no_commit = 'X', (means if the R3 and the GTS are in the same server, same client.) In debug mode I set the value of lv_no_commit to space, and then it works. It creates the GTS document.
We are also transferring billing documents and it works fine. When I checked what is the difference between transferring sales order document and transferring Billing document, I saw that in the transferring billing document there is another function is called /SAPSLL/API_6800_CSD_SYNCH, and it's calling parameters(in background, as seperate unit) are different from calling parameters of /SAPSLL/API_6800_SYNCH. You can see the difference below.
For sales document transfer :
    CALL FUNCTION '/SAPSLL/API_6800_SYNCH'
      DESTINATION cs_transfer-rfc_dest
For billing document transfer :
    CALL FUNCTION '/SAPSLL/API_6800_CSD_SYNCH'
      IN BACKGROUND TASK
      DESTINATION cs_transfer-rfc_dest
      AS SEPARATE UNIT
So my question is, do you think is it a sap standard program error, or is there any suitable settings in the customizing or SM59 to fix this error?
Thanks in advance
Serhat
Edited by: Serhat Dirihan on Jan 22, 2009 11:46 AM

Dear Serhat,
I don't think this is an RFC problem or an error. But you wrote:
When I checked why its value is 'X', I saw that if the RFC destination and the current system are the same, then lv_no_commit = 'X', (means if the R3 and the GTS are in the same server, same client.)
It is impossible to have GTS and R/3 on the same system and same client. At least the client should be different. So try to check why the call is performed like that.
Balazs

Error while transferring Forwarding settlement document to ERP Billing

Hi Experts,
My forwarding settlement document is consistent.
All the basic customizing in SAP ERP, TM has been completed as follows, but getting error while transferring forwarding settlement document to ERP billing (Ref. 1st screenshot).
I am using SAVE AND TRANSFER button to send the document to ERP, also same error is displaying while using PREVIEW INVOICE button (Ref.2nd screenshot)
Please suggest if I missed anything to send forwarding settlement document to ERP.
Customizing settings for transferring Forwarding settlement document to SAP ERP.
1. In SD Billing all condition types has been maintained, pricing procedure determination configured.
2. In SAP ERP SD condition types mapped to TM charge types using following path.
Integration with other sap components - Transportation management - Invoice integration - Billing - Definition for transportation charge elements - Define charge types.
3. Assignment of charge types in ERPSD
4. Define charge category, subcategory codes
5. Mapped ERP SD, TM sales organization with logical TM system, sales area, Order type, Billing type, Pricing procedure
6. Output types determination configured for ERP Billing in SD

Dear Serhat,
I don't think this is an RFC problem or an error. But you wrote:
When I checked why its value is 'X', I saw that if the RFC destination and the current system are the same, then lv_no_commit = 'X', (means if the R3 and the GTS are in the same server, same client.)
It is impossible to have GTS and R/3 on the same system and same client. At least the client should be different. So try to check why the call is performed like that.
Balazs

Error while transferring file :: Error while issuing ssh command.

Hi All,
I am having a JSP based website application.
I am getting the following exception in my logs.
[ERROR] 05/04/2007 03:43:44 - Error while transferring file :: Error while issuing ssh command.
java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out
            at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
            at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:305)
            at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:171)
            at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:158)
            at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:464)
            at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:414)
            at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:310)
            at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:125)
            at com.sshtools.j2ssh.net.SocketTransportProvider.<init>(Unknown Source)
            at com.sshtools.j2ssh.net.TransportProviderFactory.connectTransportProvider(Unknown Source)
            at com.sshtools.j2ssh.SshClient.connect(Unknown Source)
            at com.sshtools.j2ssh.SshClient.connect(Unknown Source)
            at com.sshtools.j2ssh.SshClient.connect(Unknown Source)
            at com.novartis.util.DataExporter.transportFile(DataExporter.java:127)
            at com.novartis.util.DataExporter.export(DataExporter.java:101)
            at com.novartis.businessmanagers.SandosSignupManagerPojoImpl.export(SandosSignupManagerPojoImpl.java:103)
            at com.novartis.util.DataExportJob.process(DataExportJob.java:48)
            at com.novartis.util.ExclusiveJob.execute(ExclusiveJob.java:35)
            at org.quartz.core.JobRunShell.run(JobRunShell.java:191)
            at org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool$WorkerThread.run(SimpleThreadPool.java:516)Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.

This means that the SSH server you're trying to connect to isn't listening. Is the SSH server running? Are you trying to connect to the right machine?

Error in transferring results of assembly order

hi, all,
i'd like to ask for assistance with the error i got during VA02 transaction. when i did check availability/delivery proposal, i encountered this error on one of the line items.
Error in transferring results of assembly order
thanks in advance.

Hi Gurus,
Have anyone found solution for this problem?
Thanks,
Tanveer

Recurring "Invalid volume directory count" error

Hi everyone!
I'm hoping that someone can shed some light on this issue, because I'm just about to lose my mind trying to figure it out!
I manage a small companies' network of approximately 35 Apple Macintosh computers. All the computers are newer 2009 or later MacBook Pros and 2009 or later iMac running Mac OS 10.5.8 or 10.6.6.
A small number of computers persistently report one or more "Invalid Volume Directory Count" errors whenever I perform a Verify Disk check in Disk Utility roughly once per month. The errors are always easily corrected by booting the computers from their system CDs and then performing a Repair Disk and/or executing an fsck command in single user mode. Unfortunately, the problem recurs the very next time I check the affected computers' disks.
One particular user whose computer had always exhibited this problem recently received a new 2010 MacBook Pro 15, and now THIS computer exhibits the problem as well! Even more baffling, and just to be certain I avoided copying any damaged Library component from the old computer's drive, I didn't use the Apple Migration Assistant to migrate this user's hard drive to the new computer; rather, I performed a clean installation of all the applications and then copied his data to the new user account. Once again, Disk Utility reported the same error the very next time I performed a Verify Disk scan on the new computer's drive.
All staff use the same applications, and most of the other computers do not exhibit this problem.
I'm completely stumped by this problem! HELP
Message was edited by: psiciliano

Hi Thomas!
Thanks for your advice!
I doubt that the drives are dying for the following reasons:
1. The computers are fairly new
2. I do check the SMART status every time I perform monthly diagnostics, and the affected units' drives always report back ok
As for backing them up, I will certainly attempt do so more frequently.
I have to believe that the problem must be caused by the way in which the affected users handle their computers; although when I ask them, they always assure me that they properly shut down and/or restart their computers.
As for the possibility that a program may be causing the issue, since everyone in this company uses the same software, I would expect this problem to affect considerably more systems than it presently does.
I will continue to troubleshoot this problem and (hopefully) discover its cause once and for all.
It's these sorts of problems that will one day do me in...career-wise, anyways.
Pietro

Error in transferring mu

Everytime I transfer songs, it says that there is an error in transferring the songs. Some songs will go on and won't. I'm using creative media source. i tried to make folders to set the music up but it will only let me set up one folder.
Its not giving me a error code.

kcb22:
If you have already put a lot of files into the top-level (root) folder then you will not be able to create additional sub-folders. Delete some or all of your songs first from the player, create a folder structure and then put your songs back on, this time into the folders. You can get away with just one subfolder, called Music (or whatever) with all of your files in this folder.
I think I'm right in saying that the Muvo TX FM can only see down to the level of one subfolder; if you go deeper than this then the songs will not be seen bu the player.
PB

Error -10609 -- even with example that ships with LV 7.0

I'm getting error -10609 ("A transfer is already in progress for the specified resource...") at AI Control from the error out cluster of AI Start. I tried running the example called Cont Acq&Graph (buffered).vi that ships with LabVIEW 7.0, and I get the same error at the same place, so I know it's not my code. I also tried rebooting the computer and power cycling the hardware, and the error still shows up on the very first attempt to run. I have no other processes running.
I have multifunction DAQ PCI-6052E and an SCXI-1001 chassis with 2 SCXI-1100 modules and 2 SCXI-1102 modules.
Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

Hi Iflash,
This error will sometimes occur during debugging of a data acquisition program. What happens is that when you start an operation and then terminate the program prematurely using the Abort button the process could still be running on the DAQ board.
The best way to avoid this is to reset the board. There are several ways to do this. The easiest is to run the Device Reset VI in LabVIEW. You will just need to wire up the device number and run the VI. Another option is to go into Measurement & Automation Explorer (MAX) and run the test panels on the device. It will error the first time but if you close the test panel and run it again it should be fine. Finally, in MAX 3.0, there should be a Reset button that you can access from the Devices and I
nterfaces >> DAQmx devices.
Anyway, hope that helps. Have a good day.
Ron

Invalid Volume Free Block Count Error In Disk Utility

My Ti-Book has been acting very strange lately so I decided to run the Verify Disk Option in the Disk Utility program. When I ran it, I got a series of messages in red that were:
Volume Bit Map Needs Minor Repair
Invalid volume free block count
Error: The Underlying Task reported failure on exit
When the verify disk function completed, I was asked to enter my administrator password. When I entered it and clicked on Okay, the Disk Utility program froze up and I had to restart.
What do the two error messages mean? How do I repair my disk?

Hi, WTM. The Verify Disk routine in Disk Utility is almost never worth running. It does the same error-detection tasks as the Repair Disk routine, but then it doesn't repair any errors that it finds.
Start up from your Tiger installer DVD, open Disk Utility, select your hard drive, and run the Repair Disk routine. If you get the same "task reported failure on exit" message, you'll need a stronger directory-repair utility like DiskWarrior, or you'll need to erase your hard drive completely and reinstall everything on it.

Error 10609 in executable file

HI all,
I have a VI that runs the function generator VI in the background, and an analog trigger to collect data. The function generator is launched with an invoke node. It works well as a VI. When I compile it and try to run the exe, I get error 10609 in clock config. We used to run function generator as a seperately launched application, and that is the same error that we would get if we forgot to launch the function generator before starting the data collection VI. I am running LV6.02 on Win2K. Thanks in advance.
Jim
Jim
LV 2013

Hi Andre,
Everything works well when I run the VIs with the developement system. I am just now trying to compile and deploy it. This is the first time that I have tried to run a VI in the background in a compiled application. The function generator VI is in the same library as the main data collection VI. The function generator just creates a sawtooth waveform continuously while data is being collected. When building the application, do I need to select Add Dynamic VI, and add the function generator? If so, do I also need to run VI Server? I am beginning to suspect that the problem might be how I addressed the dynamically loaded VI. For portability I am using the current VIs path property to build the path to the function generator. There is a test running on that station right now, but after it finishes I'll try putting in an absolute path. Any other suggestions?
Regards,
Jim
Jim
LV 2013

CIF Error while transferring vendor

We are facing CIF error while transferring vendor master to APO.
The issue is in e-mail address of the vendor master.
One way is to correct the e-mail addresses - one per line without semicolon at the end.
But the issue list is very huge to get it corrected.
Is there any other way by which we can exculde the e-mail addresses or its validation?
Thanks and regards,
Sushant

Hi Senthil,
The objective was to avoid CIF error due to incorrect address setup. This required us bypass it before data transfer. We could fix this using enhancement in ECC.
Apreciate your kind reply, though. Thanks a lot.
Warm regards,
Sushant

Error -10609!! How to correct for multi-channel data acquisition?

I am creating a program that will obtain data from all 16 channels of the PCI-DAQ6023E. I keep running into the 10609 Error "Transfer in Progress" when trying to compile and run. How do I set up the code to allow the DAQ card and Visual Basic to analyze all 16 channels at the same time?

Greetings,
Most of the time when I see the error 10609 Transfer in Progress it is because multiple calls, such as an analog config or analog start, are being called to the same DAQ device at the same time. Both calls are fighting for the DAQ card's resources. This is an issue with your program.
I recommend that you take a look at an example program, such as our simple AI example in Visual Basic which can be found in the following directory: \Program Files\National Instruments\NI-DAQ\Examples\Visual Basic\_Getting Started\AI.
You will see a Component Works control called CWAI. If you right-click on this control and choose properties you will be able to select the channels you wish to read from. You will want to read from all 16 channels by using a
channel string of 0:15 or 0,1,2,3 .. 15. You do not want to have one CWAI control for each channel.
You could also take a look at the following example available on our web site.
Continuous Analog Input on Multiple Channels Using Visual Basic with NI-DAQ Function Calls
http://venus.ni.com/stage/we/niepd_web_display.DISPLAY_EPD4?p_guid=B45EACE3E25156A4E034080020E74861&p_node=DZ52302&p_submitted=N&p_rank=&p_answer=&p_source=Internal
Regards,
Justin Britten
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Counting errors occured in personnel number (0HR_PT_2)

When loading data in BW with extractor 0HR_PT_2 we find the following message in the applicationlog:
'counting errors occured in personnel number....'
This problem causes the upload in BW to 'hang'in yellow status and the administrator must manually start the next staging (-> ODS en --> cube)
What also strikes as a bit strange is that the personnel-number in question doesn't belong to the selected CO-area in the infopackage
Anyone a clue?
Lex Meijerink

Hi,
I've found this note that might be helpfull for us.
Note 800049:
Summary
Symptom
You are using time management datasources 0HR_PT_1/2/3 for extracting data from R/3. During extraction the message 023 from the message class HRTIM00DW may occur in the protocol. This is an application warning message explaining that the error happened in the application processing part of extraction. This problem should be corrected through changing the application customizing appropriately.
If you want to change the category of this message from "warning" to "information", please implement the correction instruction from this note. This correction is a modification and the change will not be delivered with the next service package and is not in the standard. Therefore, please implement the correction instruction manually. If in the future you want the message category to be changed back to "warning" then please take the change back.
Other terms
0HR_PT_1, HRTIM00DW 023, 023, 0HR_PT_2, 0HR_PT_3
Reason and Prerequisites
Modification
Solution
Please implement the correction instruction manually. If in the future you want the message category to be changed back to "warning" then please take the change back.
David

Counter Error -10609 "transferI​nProgError​"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

Counter Error -10609 "transferInProgError"