CP creation in e-Rec EPH4
We are working on EPH4, want to know where is the CP(central person) been created (class/Badi). Right now the CP is created with same number as Pernr, we would like to create CP with random number.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks a lot for the reply Roman... I have referred to the note 997181 and ALEd the objects in the order you mentioned and the framework of CP to NA, BP, US and P is happening properly..
However, I want to know why the system is not deleting S-P relationships and creating S-CP relationships when the record is ALEd to E-recruitment.
As an extract, when I ALE a 'P' object from HR to E-rec, I would see the following relationships in HRP1001 of E-rec.
CP - P
CP - NA
CP - BP
CP - US
CP - S
Is my understanding correct? Or will we not have CP-S in HRP1001?
Thanks again for the help.
Regards
Sri.
Similar Messages
-
Issue - DBMS_DATAPUMP - EXPORT, TRANSPORTABLE
Hello everyone,
OS: RHL 64
Database:10.2.0.4
For two days I am struggling with my problem.
The issue is that I am trying to do export trasportable using DBMS_DATAPUMP.
When I am using DBMS_DATAPUMP in my log I see
Starting "DBA_GRP"."EXP_JOB11":
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/POST_INSTANCE/PLUGTS_BLK
Master table "DBA_GRP"."EXP_JOB11" successfully loaded/unloaded
When I am using
expdp dba_grp/pasw_grp@TST DUMPFILE=tablespacename200812_alex.dmp DIRECTORY=trans_dir TRANSPORT_TABLESPACES=tablespacename200812
in the log file I see
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/PLUGTS_BLK
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/TABLE
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/POST_INSTANCE/PLUGTS_BLK
Because DBMS_DATAPUMP misses
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/PLUGTS_BLK and
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/TABLE
I am not able to import the transportabe tablespace back to the database.
I have googled, in ask tom, oracle forum and many other web-sites, but was not able to resolve my problem.
Could you please have a look my code?
I believe the issue is in steps: STEP 4 or STEP 4-1 but I am not sure. I may missing another parameter or so.
Thank you very much for your help in advance!
BEGIN
v_dp_num := DBMS_DATAPUMP.OPEN('EXPORT', 'TRANSPORTABLE',NULL,'EXP_JOB11');
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('STEP 1 done: job handle no is ' || v_dp_num);
DBMS_DATAPUMP.add_file(handle => v_dp_num,
filename => rec.tablespace_name || '.metadata.log',
DIRECTORY => 'TAB_PART_ARCH',
filetype => DBMS_DATAPUMP.ku$_file_type_log_file
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('STEP 2 done');
DBMS_DATAPUMP.add_file(handle => v_dp_num,
filename => rec.tablespace_name || '.metadata.dmp',
DIRECTORY => 'TAB_PART_ARCH',
filetype => DBMS_DATAPUMP.ku$_file_type_dump_file
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('STEP 3 done');
DBMS_DATAPUMP.set_parameter(handle => v_dp_num,
name=>'TTS_FULL_CHECK',
value=>1
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('STEP 4 done');
DBMS_DATAPUMP.metadata_filter(Handle => v_dp_num,
Name => 'TABLESPACE_EXPR',
value => 'IN (''%tablespacename200812%'')'
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('STEP 4-1 done');
DBMS_DATAPUMP.metadata_filter(Handle => v_dp_num,
Name => 'TABLESPACE_LIST',
value => '''tablespacename200812'''
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('STEP 5 done');
DBMS_DATAPUMP.start_job(v_dp_num);
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
v_sqlerrm := SQLERRM;
sp_log('METADATA FILE CREATION FAILED FOR ' || rec.tablespace_name || ' reason: ' || v_sqlerrm);
DBMS_DATAPUMP.stop_job(v_dp_num);
END;Hi,
That line
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/TABLE
is missing when the datapump can't find any tables in the specified tablespace. You could check it by using this query:
select table_name from dba_tables where tablespace_name in 'YOUR_TABLESPACE_NAME';
I'm going to guess that you won't get any rows back.
Here is an updated .sql script that works fine. In the beginning I drop and then create a tablespace and table. If you have a tablespace or table called that and you run this script, it will drop these 2 exiting objects.
---test_api.sql
set echo on
drop tablespace test including contents;
create tablespace test datafile 'test.f' size 10m reuse;
create table scott.test_table (a number) tablespace test;
insert into scott.test_table values (1);
commit;
alter tablespace test read only;
declare
v_dp_num number;
v_sqlerrm VARCHAR2(4000);
BEGIN
v_dp_num := DBMS_DATAPUMP.OPEN('EXPORT', 'TRANSPORTABLE',NULL,'EXP_JOB25');
DBMS_DATAPUMP.add_file(handle => v_dp_num,
filename => 'metadata.log',
DIRECTORY => 'DPUMP_DIR',
filetype => DBMS_DATAPUMP.ku$_file_type_log_file
DBMS_DATAPUMP.add_file(handle => v_dp_num,
filename => 'metadata.dmp',
DIRECTORY => 'DPUMP_DIR',
filetype => DBMS_DATAPUMP.ku$_file_type_dump_file
DBMS_DATAPUMP.set_parameter(handle => v_dp_num,
name=>'TTS_FULL_CHECK',
value=>1
DBMS_DATAPUMP.metadata_filter(Handle => v_dp_num,
Name => 'TABLESPACE_EXPR',
value => 'IN (''TEST'')'
DBMS_DATAPUMP.start_job(v_dp_num);
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
v_sqlerrm := SQLERRM;
DBMS_DATAPUMP.stop_job(v_dp_num);
END;
------ metadata.log output
Starting "SYS"."EXP_JOB25":
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/PLUGTS_BLK
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/TABLE
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/POST_INSTANCE/PLUGTS_BLK
Master table "SYS"."EXP_JOB25" successfully loaded/unloaded
Dump file set for SYS.EXP_JOB25 is:
/ade/dgagne_l6/oracle/work/metadata.dmp
Datafiles required for transportable tablespace TEST:
/ade/dgagne_l6/oracle/dbs/test.f
Job "SYS"."EXP_JOB25" successfully completed at 16:35:10
Please let me know if you have success in getting your tables in the dumpfile.
Processing object type TRANSPORTABLE_EXPORT/TABLE
Thanks
Dean -
Hi All,
We have created a Contract/Subscription and the corresponding Rev Rec document that got posted is with fiscal/period as 0000/00.
Revenue Recognition: Fiscal/Period updated as 0000/00 for a Rev rec document created after creation of a Contract.
We have not executed VF45 or any revenue recognition process.
What amay be the reasons and how can we proceed further on this ?
Thanks,
M.Shiva KumarDear Amrish,
Problem of this you did not maintain the provision account in your revenue account determination. Please go to vkoa transaction and maintatin this provisional account any account number.
eg; application: v. condition type: kofk, chart of account: int, sales org: 0001, revenue account: 89999, provisional account 788888 (something)
I hope you understood
Thanks & regards -
Prevent Info Rec creation?
Is it possible to prevent the creation of an Info Rec when a P.O. is created? If so, how?
Yes you can do by dong the settings in
Go to OMFI Tcode and create the defulat value without any key and remove the info update indicator from indicator tab and save.
then system will not update the info record
please see the note below
202173 - step by step help
191596 -
E Rec - Approval for requisition, position creation
Hi Gurus,
I understand that we can attach positions created in OM to a requisition at the time of creating the requsition.
Can we create positions via E-rec process & the same can be release after workflow is approved
Please confirm that is thr any standard functionailty for below
For different requisitions created approval is clubed and only one approval request goes to the assigned person in UWL
For each requistion different approvers are assigned, eg: For HR>HR Head, Finance> Finance Department Head then Competent Authoriy.
Where and how to incorporate checks for candidate to apply & restrict for an opening. eg: Trainees requirement and checks for age has to applied- only 30 years and below can apply. The system should restrict all other candidates on this validation.
Restrict an candidate to apply only against a Reference no. or position title & restrict unsolicited applications.
Please assist with your valuable comments on the above.
RegardsHi Pavan & Vijaya,
I also have requirement of modifying Standard Workflow WS WS51800008.
I have done following setting in SPRO.
SAP E-rec->Technical Settings>Workflow--> Click On documentation of Set Up Approval Process for Requisition (Workflow) and there it has given you the clear Explanation about defining parameters in the Txn WF_EXTSRV
after this i did GENERATE TASK and it generated a new TASK. but in this config it ask for Logical system and i am not sure which logical system i have to give so i have kept is blank..
I have also done URL settings in WF_Handcust.
Also in SICF when i tested my service /sap/bc/bsp/sap/hrrcf_approval/application.bsp it gives me following error...
SAP Note
The following error text was processed in the system:
BSP Exception: Das Objekt default.htm in der URL /sap/bc/bsp/sap/hrrcf_approval/default.htm?sap-client=668&sap-sessioncmd=open ist nicht gültig.
so gurus kindly suggest me what should be done to make this workflow running...also i m modifying this workflow to add 1 dialog task so do i need to make this entry foe this task in SWFVISU??
thanks in advance.... -
Hi,
In 4.6 version, I just created one Info Record(ME11) where in screen 102(purchase organization 1) I entered net price and next have VALID TO field. This field displaying in disable mode with mandatory, So i couldn't select the valid to date .
This is the reason i couldn't create a Info record.Before that I changed some configuration in MM, May be that ll affect here?
Please Guide Me
Thanks & Regards,
Dhanush.S.Tgo to
Materials Management --> Purchasing Info record --> Define Document types.
here for the transaction, double click on it
go to conditions, and make the net price as optional.....
and create info record again... -
User Exits for Invoice creation ,cancellation and sales return
Hi Gurus,
Pl help me it's very urgent.
I did not find any user exit invoice creation so i wrote the following code in include program
MV60AF0B_BELEG_SICHERN.
This code is to update the Z*table while saving invoice ,cancellation and sales return.
The code modification is like below
FORM BELEG_SICHERN *
Buchen Fakturabelege *
FORM BELEG_SICHERN.
READ TABLE XVBRK INDEX 1.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_ALL'.
MESSAGE S032.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
IF SAMH_MOD = ON.
EXPORT XKOMFK TO MEMORY ID 'SDBILLDL'.
ENDIF.
DATA: CALC_TYPE.
IF REBATE_DETERMINED = 'Y'.
CALC_TYPE = 'A'.
ELSE.
CALC_TYPE = 'I'.
ENDIF.
*{ INSERT RD1K903017 1
Work Area*********************
data : wa_xvbrk type VBRKVB.
data : wa_xvbrp type vbrpvb.
data : wa_zmigo type zmigo.
data : wa_vbrp type vbrp.
Internal table Creation*******
DATA: BEGIN OF tab_XVBRP OCCURS 100.
INCLUDE STRUCTURE VBRPVB.
DATA: END OF tab_XVBRP.
data : begin of tab_vbeln occurs 10,
vbeln type vbrk-vbeln,
knumv type vbrk-knumv,
end of tab_vbeln.
data : tab_zmigo type table of zmigo.
data : tab_vbrp type table of vbrp.
*****Data declaration*************
data : v_no_of_inv type i.
data : v_vbeln_no(10) type n.
data : v_last_inv_no(10) type n.
data : v_first_inv_no(10) type c.
data : v_tot_qty type i.
data : v_frbnr type mkpf-frbnr.
*******Ranges*********************
ranges : r_vbeln for vbrk-vbeln.
*****Populating IT****************
tab_xvbrp[] = xvbrp[].
describe table xvbrk lines v_no_of_inv.
*} INSERT
CALL FUNCTION 'RV_INVOICE_DOCUMENT_ADD'
EXPORTING
VBSK_I = VBSK
WITH_POSTING = 'A'
PREISFINDUNGSART = CALC_TYPE
IMPORTING
VBSK_E = VBSK
TABLES
XKOMFK = XKOMFK
XTHEAD = XTHEAD
XVBFS = XVBFS
XVBSS = XVBSS
XVBRK = XVBRK
XVBRP = XVBRP
XVBPA = XVBPA
XKOMV = XKOMV.
*{ INSERT RD1K903017 2
data : v_count type i,v_fkimg type i .
data : v_no_of_records(10) type n.
wa_xvbrk = xvbrk.
********Selecting the last rec no from ZMIGO
select max( sr_no ) from zmigo into v_no_of_records.
*****If Distribution channel is not ZB*********
if wa_xvbrk-vtweg ne 'ZB' and ( wa_xvbrk-fkart = 'ZRIN' or wa_xvbrk-fkart = 'ZRTE' ).
if v_no_of_inv = 1. " Process only when there is one invoice
loop at tab_xvbrp into wa_xvbrp where ( matnr ne 'CDGSTP0001' and
matnr ne 'CD-RW' and
matnr ne 'CD-RW65OHS' and
matnr ne 'CABLE' and
matnr ne 'CD-R' and
matnr ne 'CDQ80N4' and
matnr ne 'GENERAL' and
matnr ne 'NERO' and
matnr ne 'OTHERS' and
matnr ne 'SPARE PARTS' and
matnr ne 'PROMO ITEM' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-1' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-2' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-3' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-4' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-5' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-6' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-7' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-8' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-9' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-10' ).
v_fkimg = wa_xvbrp-fkimg .
v_fkimg = v_fkimg / 1000.
do v_fkimg times.
v_no_of_records = v_no_of_records + 1.
wa_zmigo-sr_no = v_no_of_records.
wa_zmigo-po_no = wa_xvbrk-vbeln.
wa_zmigo-item_no = wa_xvbrp-posnr.
wa_zmigo-mblnr = wa_xmkpf-mblnr.
wa_zmigo-doc_type = wa_xvbrk-fkart.
wa_zmigo-posting_date = wa_xvbrk-fkdat.
wa_zmigo-created_on = sy-datum.
wa_zmigo-created_time = sy-uzeit.
wa_zmigo-bill_lno = v_frbnr.
wa_zmigo-material = wa_xvbrp-matnr.
wa_zmigo-inv_no = wa_xvbrk-vbeln.
wa_zmigo-inv_item_no = wa_xvbrp-posnr.
wa_zmigo-plant = wa_xvbrp-werks.
wa_zmigo-inv_date = wa_xvbrk-fkdat.
wa_zmigo-customer = wa_xvbrk-kunag.
wa_zmigo-unit = 1.
wa_zmigo-mtype = '601'.
insert into zmigo values wa_zmigo.
enddo.
clear : wa_zmigo.
endloop.
clear : v_count,v_fkimg,wa_zmigo.
refresh tab_zmigo[].
clear v_no_of_inv.
else. "When there are Split Invoices
v_last_inv_no = wa_xvbrk-vbeln.
v_vbeln_no = v_last_inv_no - v_no_of_inv + 1.
v_first_inv_no = v_vbeln_no.
sort tab_xvbrp by vbeln.
loop at tab_xvbrp into wa_xvbrp where ( matnr ne 'CDGSTP0001' and
matnr ne 'CD-RW' and
matnr ne 'CD-RW65OHS' and
matnr ne 'CABLE' and
matnr ne 'CD-R' and
matnr ne 'CDQ80N4' and
matnr ne 'GENERAL' and
matnr ne 'NERO' and
matnr ne 'OTHERS' and
matnr ne 'SPARE PARTS' and
matnr ne 'PROMO ITEM' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-1' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-2' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-3' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-4' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-5' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-6' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-7' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-8' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-9' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-10' ).
v_fkimg = wa_xvbrp-fkimg .
v_fkimg = v_fkimg / 1000.
do v_fkimg times.
v_no_of_records = v_no_of_records + 1.
wa_zmigo-sr_no = v_no_of_records.
wa_zmigo-po_no = v_vbeln_no. "wa_vbrp-vbeln.
wa_zmigo-item_no = wa_xvbrp-posnr.
wa_zmigo-mblnr = wa_xmkpf-mblnr.
wa_zmigo-doc_type = wa_xvbrk-fkart.
wa_zmigo-posting_date = wa_xvbrk-fkdat.
wa_zmigo-created_on = sy-datum.
wa_zmigo-created_time = sy-uzeit.
wa_zmigo-bill_lno = v_frbnr.
wa_zmigo-material = wa_xvbrp-matnr.
wa_zmigo-inv_no = v_vbeln_no.
wa_zmigo-inv_item_no = wa_xvbrp-posnr.
wa_zmigo-plant = wa_xvbrp-werks.
wa_zmigo-inv_date = wa_xvbrk-fkdat.
wa_zmigo-customer = wa_xvbrk-kunag.
wa_zmigo-unit = 1.
wa_zmigo-mtype = '601'.
insert into zmigo values wa_zmigo.
enddo.
clear : wa_zmigo.
at end of vbeln.
v_vbeln_no = v_vbeln_no + 1.
endat.
clear : v_count,v_fkimg,wa_zmigo.
refresh tab_zmigo[].
endloop.
endif. "End of first 2nd IF.
clear : v_no_of_inv, v_vbeln_no.
endif.
****************Sales return************************************
if wa_xvbrk-fkart = 'ZRRE' and wa_xvbrk-vtweg ne 'ZB'.
loop at tab_xvbrp into wa_xvbrp where ( matnr ne 'CDGSTP0001' and
matnr ne 'CD-RW' and
matnr ne 'CD-RW65OHS' and
matnr ne 'CABLE' and
matnr ne 'CD-R' and
matnr ne 'CDQ80N4' and
matnr ne 'GENERAL' and
matnr ne 'NERO' and
matnr ne 'OTHERS' and
matnr ne 'SPARE PARTS' and
matnr ne 'PROMO ITEM' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-1' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-2' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-3' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-4' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-5' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-6' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-7' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-8' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-9' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-10' ).
v_fkimg = wa_xvbrp-fkimg.
v_fkimg = v_fkimg / 1000.
v_tot_qty = v_tot_qty + v_fkimg.
do v_fkimg times.
v_no_of_records = v_no_of_records + 1.
wa_zmigo-sr_no = v_no_of_records.
wa_zmigo-po_no = wa_xvbrk-vbeln.
wa_zmigo-item_no = wa_xvbrp-posnr.
wa_zmigo-doc_type = wa_xvbrk-fkart.
wa_zmigo-posting_date = wa_xvbrk-fkdat.
wa_zmigo-created_on = sy-datum.
wa_zmigo-created_time = sy-uzeit.
wa_zmigo-material = wa_xvbrp-matnr.
wa_zmigo-inv_no = wa_xvbrk-vbeln.
wa_zmigo-inv_item_no = wa_xvbrp-posnr.
wa_zmigo-plant = wa_xvbrp-werks.
wa_zmigo-inv_date = wa_xvbrk-fkdat.
wa_zmigo-customer = wa_xvbrk-kunag.
wa_zmigo-unit = 1.
wa_zmigo-mtype = '651'.
condense wa_xvbrk-xblnr.
wa_zmigo-reference = wa_xvbrk-xblnr.
********Bill of lading no**
select single bill_lno from zmigo_final into v_frbnr where inv_no = wa_xvbrk-xblnr and material = wa_xvbrp-matnr.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
wa_zmigo-bill_lno = v_frbnr.
endif.
insert into zmigo values wa_zmigo.
enddo.
clear : wa_zmigo,wa_xvbrp , v_fkimg, v_frbnr.
endloop.
endif.
*******Invoice Cancellation*****************************
if wa_xvbrk-fkart = 'ZRS1' and wa_xvbrk-vtweg ne 'ZB'.
delete tab_xvbrp[] where shkzg eq 'X'.
loop at tab_xvbrp into wa_xvbrp where ( matnr ne 'CDGSTP0001' and
matnr ne 'CD-RW' and
matnr ne 'CD-RW65OHS' and
matnr ne 'CABLE' and
matnr ne 'CD-R' and
matnr ne 'CDQ80N4' and
matnr ne 'GENERAL' and
matnr ne 'NERO' and
matnr ne 'OTHERS' and
matnr ne 'SPARE PARTS' and
matnr ne 'PROMO ITEM' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-1' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-2' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-3' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-4' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-5' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-6' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-7' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-8' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-9' and
matnr ne 'PROMO-10' ).
v_fkimg = wa_xvbrp-fkimg.
v_fkimg = v_fkimg / 1000.
v_tot_qty = v_tot_qty + v_fkimg.
do v_fkimg times.
v_no_of_records = v_no_of_records + 1.
wa_zmigo-sr_no = v_no_of_records.
wa_zmigo-po_no = wa_xvbrk-vbeln.
wa_zmigo-item_no = wa_xvbrp-posnr.
wa_zmigo-doc_type = wa_xvbrk-fkart.
wa_zmigo-posting_date = wa_xvbrk-fkdat.
wa_zmigo-created_on = sy-datum.
wa_zmigo-created_time = sy-uzeit.
wa_zmigo-material = wa_xvbrp-matnr.
wa_zmigo-inv_no = wa_xvbrk-vbeln.
wa_zmigo-inv_item_no = wa_xvbrp-posnr.
wa_zmigo-plant = wa_xvbrp-werks.
wa_zmigo-inv_date = wa_xvbrk-fkdat.
wa_zmigo-customer = wa_xvbrk-kunag.
wa_zmigo-unit = 1.
condense wa_xvbrk-zuonr.
wa_zmigo-reference = wa_xvbrk-zuonr.
wa_zmigo-mtype = '602'.
********Bill of lading no**
select single bill_lno from zmigo_final into v_frbnr where inv_no = wa_xvbrk-xblnr and material = wa_xvbrp-matnr.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
wa_zmigo-bill_lno = v_frbnr.
endif.
insert into zmigo values wa_zmigo.
enddo.
clear : wa_zmigo,wa_xvbrp , v_fkimg.
endloop.
endif.
clear : v_no_of_records.
*} INSERT
CALL FUNCTION 'STACK_RESET'.
R185D-DATALOSS = SPACE.
FOLGEAUFRUF102 = SPACE.
PERFORM SETPAR_INIT.
*{ INSERT RD1K903017 3
*} INSERT
LEAVE.
ENDFORM.
This program is working fine for single user but in production where no of people are creating the invoices from different places the data is not getting updated in table ZMIGO.
sometime populating with wrong data , partial data and sometimes no updation at all.
I have used the table locking system enqueue and dequeue FM's before n after updation but still the same
thing is happening.
What could be the reason.
Looking for help very urgent any other alternate option.Hi,
Go thru these..
Enhancement
SDVFX009 Billing doc. processing KIDONO (payment reference numbe
SDVFX010 User exit item table for the customer lines
SDVFX011 Userexit for the komkcv- and kompcv-structures
V05I0001 User exits for billing index
V05N0001 User Exits for Printing Billing Docs. using POR Procedu
V60A0001 Customer functions in the billing document
V60P0001 Data provision for additional fields for display in lis
V61A0001 Customer enhancement: Pricing
SDVFX001 User exit header line in delivery to accounting
SDVFX002 User exit for A/R line (transfer to accounting)
SDVFX003 User exit: Cash clearing (transfer to accounting)
SDVFX004 User exit: G/L line (transfer to accounting)
SDVFX008 User exit: Processing of transfer structures SD-FI
SDVFX007 User exit: Billing plan during transfer to Accounting
SDVFX006 User exit: Tax line (transfer to accounting)
SDVFX005 User exit: Reserves (transfer to accounting)
Business Add-in
SD_CIN_LV60AU02 BADI for billing
If it is helpful rewards points
Regards
Pratap.M -
Deletion of S-P relation and creation of S-CP relationship in E-recruiting
Hi Experts,
We have ALEd the Employee(P) object type from HR system to E-rec. We have activated the BAdI HRRCF00_DELETE_SPREL to delete the existing S-P relationships and to create CP-S relationship in HRP1001 if E-recruiting. The ALE which splits the P sent from HR to E-rec via CP into NA, BP, US and P is however working fine.
Do we need to do anything else for the S-P deletion and S-CP relationship creation in HRP1001of e-rec? Any inputs would be of great value.
Please help!!
Thanks
Sri!Thanks a lot for the reply Roman... I have referred to the note 997181 and ALEd the objects in the order you mentioned and the framework of CP to NA, BP, US and P is happening properly..
However, I want to know why the system is not deleting S-P relationships and creating S-CP relationships when the record is ALEd to E-recruitment.
As an extract, when I ALE a 'P' object from HR to E-rec, I would see the following relationships in HRP1001 of E-rec.
CP - P
CP - NA
CP - BP
CP - US
CP - S
Is my understanding correct? Or will we not have CP-S in HRP1001?
Thanks again for the help.
Regards
Sri. -
Vendor creation default values
Where is the config for setting up default values on vendor creation process- fields like- "check double invoice" ?
Thanks
RajHi Rajendra ,
Screen control for the vendor is controlled by the Account group you assign to them. So go to IMG> Financial accounting > Account rec. and payables> Master data > Define account group with screen layout. Here you can find and change the the fields status for General , company code and purchasing data.
Hope it helps.
Thanks
Kiran
P.S Pls award points if you find the answer is helpful. -
What parameters to be set during installation and DB creation
i am going to create 10g/ 2003 server database and
migrate from 8i / 2000 server ( 15 gb) running in archive log mode.
what parameter i have to set and check
( SGA,PGA FLASH_ REC ,performance tuning parameters etc) during installation and database creation.
santhanam.I know there are huge amount of docs out there but I collected these links in real upgrade tasks/experience...
[Oracle® Database Upgrade Guide 10g Release 2 (10.2)|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14238/toc.htm]
[Oracle Metalink: Complete checklist for manual upgrades to 10gR2 Note:316889.1|https://metalink.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=316889.1]
[Oracle Metalink: Rule Based Optimizer is to be Desupported in Oracle10g Doc ID: 189702.1|https://metalink.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=189702.1]
[Oracle Metalink: Database Upgrade Companion|https://metalink.oracle.com/cgi-bin/cr/getfile.cgi?p_attid=466181.1:upgrade_guide1]
[Oracle Metalink: Managing Rollback/Undo Segments in AUM (Automatic Undo Management) Doc ID: 135090.1|https://metalink.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=135090.1]
[Oracle Metalink: Managing CBO Stats during an upgrade to 10g or 11g Doc ID: 465787.1|https://metalink.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=465787.1]
[Oracle Metalink: Complete Upgrade Checklist for Manual Upgrades from 8.X / 9.0.1 to Oracle9iR2 (9.2.0) Doc ID: 159657.1|https://metalink.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=159657.1]
[Oracle Metalink: Instructions to Upgrade Context on 8.0.6 to either 8.1.7 interMedia Text or 9.2 Oracle Text upon database Migration from 8.0.6 Doc ID: 209544.1|https://metalink.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=209544.1#Migration%20Plan%20for%208.1.7%20Using%20interMedia%20to%209.2]
because I would consider upgrading...
Edited by: Kecskemethy on Oct 2, 2009 2:19 AM -
E-Recruitment - Loggin in Issues in E-Rec instance after ALE transfer
Hi,
We are running E-Rec in seperate instance and we have plans to implement the ALE Data transfer as a scheduled periodical Background job from HR system to E-Rec system.
We have also cutomized the ALE to set a default password when the data is transferred in to the E-Rec system.(We had done this to avoid the time & effort required from SAP Basis admin to reset the password of each E-Rec user whenever the ALE data transfer is performed)
After performing the ALE data transfer, when logging in the portal and accessing the E-Rec start page link the system prompts the user for a new password.
We are looking at an option where the ALE program can be modified to set a confirmed password instead of initial password.
Any suggestions on fixing this issue please. I request a solution for this on a high priority.
Thanks
G RajSorry to be this direct,
but the first question which comes to my mind: Are you kidding?
You describe that you set the password of each user to the same default value just the bais admin is too lazy? And if this would not be enough you want that everyone can keep this password for eternity so everyone has always the possibility to log into every account including the recruiter / admin ones as they would be part of the ALE as all employees are part of the ALE and noone ever has to change the password (usually if you do not force someone to change his password he will never do)? Seems your security team died from an heart attac when u presented this idea so they do not have to be asked any longer.
Back to business:
The ALE creates a password on user creation. If the candidate is updated later the password won't be touched. Also if the user already exists when ALE is transfering an employee for the first time, the user will keep his password as before assigne authorization.
E-Recruiting has a standard function that the user can get a new password and unlock the user so no admin has to move a finger as long as the candidate has an email address where the system can send the new password.
If you do not want to bother the user with varius logins and passwords whild keeping a secure solution you shoul invest in a SSO solution.
Best Regards
Roman -
E-recruitment objects NA, ND and NE creation
Hi,
I need some clarification on E-rec Objects as I am developing one report. Wherein, I want to pull out all the candidates those are applied for that particular requisition.
When I give the logic on NA to ND relationship which gets created in HRP1001 then if recruiter has search for candidate in candidate search and pull the candidate and applied to the requisition in that case, the ND has not created for that candidate.
I have seen one case wherein candidate has applied for a requisition and then withdrawn the application in that NA to ND has created in HRp1001 but NE is not appearing for this case.
Kindly give some clarification on these object creation.
Regards,
SarikaHi Sarika,
Please keep in mind that there are cleaner ways to exploit the data model of e-recruiting and that is almost never required to access database tables directly.
Most relevant classes can be found by searching with pattern CL_HRRCF*BL. This search will give you a list of all business logic classes. Most of the times, these classes contain methods which will also return the text labels for most key fields.
Regards,
Luk -
Incorrect period in control rec. of CoCd HITA; no conversion
Hi All
While changing the posting period in GR creation, I am getting the below error:
Incorrect period in control rec. of CoCd HITA; no conversion
The current period (month/year) of the control record is122006
Seeking for expert's help.
Regards
Vidyahi ,
one thing u have to do, go to t-code mmpv or obyc
company code -
period- 08.09 (like month)
fiscal yaer -2009
execute, -
File system check recs on new ASAs
Just curious if anyone knows why I'd be seeing these on a new ASAs. The last two I received had these fsck records:
f-monona-1# sh flash
--#-- --length-- -----date/time------ path 182 16275456 Dec 13 2010 16:46:02 asa821-k8.bin 223 15962112 Feb 01 2011 16:40:15 asa832-k8.bin 183 49152 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0000.REC 13 2048 Dec 13 2010 16:47:20 coredumpinfo 14 43 Feb 01 2011 16:47:11 coredumpinfo/coredump.cfg 184 11348300 Dec 13 2010 16:47:54 asdm-621.bin 3 2048 Dec 13 2010 16:51:36 log 12 2048 Dec 13 2010 16:51:44 crypto_archive 224 15841428 Feb 01 2011 16:43:34 asdm-641.bin 186 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0001.REC 187 12105313 Dec 13 2010 16:52:00 csd_3.5.841-k9.pkg 188 2048 Dec 13 2010 16:52:02 sdesktop 225 0 Dec 13 2010 16:52:02 sdesktop/data.xml 189 2857568 Dec 13 2010 16:52:02 anyconnect-wince-ARMv4I-2.4.1012-k9.pkg 190 3203909 Dec 13 2010 16:52:04 anyconnect-win-2.4.1012-k9.pkg 191 4832344 Dec 13 2010 16:52:06 anyconnect-macosx-i386-2.4.1012-k9.pkg 192 5209423 Dec 13 2010 16:52:08 anyconnect-linux-2.4.1012-k9.pkg 193 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0002.REC 194 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0003.REC 195 92160 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0004.REC 196 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0005.REC 197 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0006.REC 198 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0007.REC 199 675840 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0008.REC 200 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0009.REC 201 677888 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0010.REC 202 30720 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0011.REC 203 30720 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0012.REC 204 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0013.REC 205 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0014.REC 206 4096 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0015.REC 207 4096 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0016.REC 208 4096 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0017.REC 209 4096 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0018.REC 210 6144 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0019.REC 211 6144 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0020.REC 212 6144 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0021.REC 213 22528 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0022.REC 214 38912 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0023.REC 215 34816 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0024.REC 216 43008 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0025.REC 217 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0026.REC 218 26624 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0027.REC 219 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0028.REC 220 26624 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0029.REC 221 2048 Jan 01 1980 00:00:00 FSCK0030.RECI have seen the same issues on many multiple NEW ASA's and DON'T think this is a problem with the received ASA's flash card or file structure. I have deleted and reformatted many of these flash cards and not experienced any new FSCK files. The flash cards from new ASA's have all passed.
This leads me to belive that the master flash card used in manufacturing, that was used for the creation of the imaged flash cards, in final production had corruption at times. And these FSCK files that were on the master used for duplicating, were then copied with its FSCK files, to the flash of the shipping ASA's. -
No creation if material is missing, Still IW31 ( Work order ) is getting created
Hi Experts,
I reviewed few discussions and unable to get the correct answer.
I did the configuration for Material availability check on Order Creation with Path ..
Plant Maintenance and Customer Service - Maintenance and Service Processing - Functions and Settings for Order Types - Availability Check for Material, PRTs, and Capacities - Define Inspection Control
In this I assigned my order type with Business Function 1.
Material Availability :
Plant XX01
Order Type XX09
Availability Check 1 Check availability during order creation
Checking Rule 01 No Blocked Stocked - All rec/issue elmts
Component Check Type Blank
Collect. conversion 3 No creation if material is missing
PRT Availability :
No Check ( Not checked )
Checking Rule 01 Status check
Collect. conversion Blank
Capacity check
No Check ( Not checked )
Overall profile Blank
Collect. conversion Blank
My question is:
MMBE for that Material ZERO.
Before Config,
when I create Order manually IW31 with a components , Status is showing Mat.availability not checked ( MANC ).
After Config.
when I create Order manually IW31 with a components , Status is showing Material committed MACM.
When Configured for [Collect. conversion 3 No creation if material is missing], still order is getting created.
I changed to 2 or 1 , still order is getting created with no difference
But its going to a confirmation proposals asking me to do
either continue / ATP quantity / Scope of check.
If I select 1 or 2, it should show Missing Parts status or if select 3, it should stop creation of Order. But its not happening as expected.
Please let me know where I am missing Config.Hello
Q1 )
If I change option 1 or 2 :
1 User decides on creation if material is missing
Answer:If Material is not Created the system wont allow to add you that material until unless you create the material master created.I am considering here that you don't have material master
2 Creation even though no material is available
Answer:It will allow you to create the work order.i am considering here that you don't have sufficient stock.
Q2) what should be the expected Status for Option 1 or 2.
Before Config it was showing
Status is showing Mat.availability not checked ( MANC ).
After Option 1 or 2, Expected Status ?
Answer: You need to enter value 02 on the Availability Check field on the MRP3 tab of Material Master via TC MM02.
you will be get Material committed MACM after Saving the Order.
Br
Rakesh
Maybe you are looking for
-
i m new to servlets. can any body plz tell me what and how to do configurations for servlets
-
My screen is white, what do i do
My ipods screen turned white, what should i do
-
Block from key in business area for company do not have business area
Dear experts, How can I do a validation rule to block from key in business area for company do not have business area? Kindly advice. tks!
-
Nesting: What did I do wrong?
I just put together 4 shows that were all using the same credits. i created the credits in a new timeline, dragged that sequence to the viewer and then overwrote it into the end of the other 4 sequences. I had to make a change to the credits, opened
-
No 'save' capability with iweb09
Is it just me or do you have to publish a site created with iweb09. I am building a site - could have 50-60 pages before I want it to go live and I want to save it to a folder and view/test it before I publish it on the web. I was able to do this wit