Creating Transformations -- Automatic Rules not Generating

Hi All,
I am Trying to create Transformations from Data source to DSO,
Automatic Rules not Generating, I have more that 120 Objects in DSO but it is generating only 2 roles , I am manually creating remaining rules
For automatic rules generation what I have to do ???
Regards,
Shaik

Hi Anil,
Thanks for quick Response ,
I am trying this , I am installing Transfer rules from BC, once Transfer rules Activate, I think it will work,
I need to know from u is this right way to do this????
Regards
Shaik

Similar Messages

Error creating AIR file: could not generate timestamp

I have been getting this error the last few days.
Error creating AIR file: could not generate timestamp:
sun.security.validator.BalidatorException:PKIX path building failed:
sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find
valid certificatio path to requested target.
https://timestamp.geotrust.com/tsa
I found one thread saying this url must be accessible but when I go there I get "404 -- page not found".
Since this was working now it is not I'm looking for a direction.

Hey Karthik,
First of all, are you using ECLIPSE? What is your development
Environment. I had run into same issue, after hours of trying
different things, I installed the FLEX BUILDER and was able to
create the application without any issues. I have also noticed that
FLEX BUILDER works more smoothly than Eclipse and since then I have
been developing within FB.
Thanks.

Delete rule not generated in DDL

Hello,
I am using SQL Developer Data Modeler (Version 3.1.1.703) and experience the following issue:
I have a table with a foreign key and a delete rule "SET NULL". However if I generate the DDL for "SQL Server 2005" then the rule is not there. Only if I change the rule to "CASCADE" then it is generated properly. Is that a bug or am I missing something?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Michael

Hi Philip,
when can we expect a fix for that since it is kind of an important function for us because without it we can't export a valid database structure.
Thanks in advance,
Michael

Error in Update Rule migration using "Create Transformation"

Hi gurus,
We are encountering errors in the migration of our 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_BX update rules into a transformation via URs Context Menu Additional functions - > Create transformation
This action creates a new transformation, but is only generating very little Routine assignements in our KF fields. That is, some KF have their old ABAP converted automatically into ABAP OO while the rest (majority) of KF fields have no rule (routine) assigned at all.
However, the most surprising thing is that after executing the "Create Transformation", the log shows everything correct and warnings (message 652 "Routine created. Verify sintax").
Have you ever faced this problem?
Is the automatic migration tool working correctly?
If not, do we need to manually create all those KF routines that have not been correctly been migrated? Even after two years since new dataflow that was released?
We are on SP 15...
Thanks and best regards,
Enric

Hi Juanjo,
In fact, if I understand you correctly, I'm facing the same situation: all FORMS based on OLD individual KFs routine are now available in the global transformation routine in ABAP OO, but what I'm missing is the individual source to target KF field mapping to routine, where the method with the perform to each coding should be done.
Shall I understand this is a common bug? Manual correction proposed?
Thanks,
Enric

FB60 - Substitution rule to generate Text in automatic generated line item

Hello SAP genious,
While we post vendor invoice ( FB60) and customer invoice (FB70), at this time along with Dr and Cr line items one automatic additional line item is getting generated this is based on Tax type which you select while making invoice.
now, I want to show some text in this automatically created line items. This might be possible by creating some substitution rule but i am not sure.
and if it is possible through substitution rule then what could be my prerequisite, and check would be..?????
can you please tell how can i get Text in this additional line item getting created due to VAT tax code.
Thanks a Lot for your input.
your reply will be rewarded with points.
Thanks
Jignesh

Thanks for all your replies.
I Want the field BSEG- KOBEZ i.e description field in the accounting doc of the offsetting entry to be replaced in the GL account text field.
Ex :
PK    Account        Description                  Amount           Text
31    100000         Furniture Vendor             50             Sales
40    1999             Inter Compy                     50             Furniture Vendor
I want the description of offsetting entry vendor description i.e Furniture vendor (field BSEG-KOBEZ) to be replaced in GL line item text BSEG-SGTXT.
I cant find the field BSEG- KOBEZ while i search in the substituion to replace in Text field.
How do i write in substitution to say that the offsetting entry description should be in text field of GL account.

Software Metering is not generating rules

Hi,
I have software metering enabled to collect data every 2 days.
I have also enabled "Auto-create disabled metering rules from recent usage inventory data" with 10% and 1000 rules for the other two fields.
I find that not a single rule has been generated till now.
I am unable to find any article so far on troubleshooting this issue. Can someone please shed some light on this?
Edit: By the way, am I being impatient or does this process take days to complete? It has been 2 hours since this was enabled and I have ensured the data collection happens during working hours. In fact, it was set to happen about 20 mins back.

2 hours? yes, you are being impatient. check tomorrow--or better yet, next week. :)
Back (previous job) when I was trying to use the built-in stuff for Metering (new job we use a 3rd party application), one thing I learned was to find out from the powers-that-be *exactly* what they intend to do with this data. Depending upon what
they expect to do with the results, it may (or may not) make sense to create a custom rule metering for widgets version *, instead of when the auto-created rules might make 4 different rules you would optionally enable, one each for version 1, 2, 3, 4... and
then next week when you deploy version 5... you aren't monitoring for that. and then 3 months later Mgmt asks why the usage of Widgets isn't being properly tracked, and you trace it back to not enabling the rule for version 5....
Personally, I doubt you'll get a comprehensive answer to the question from the powers-that-be. In my experience, they don't know yet exactly what they will do with the information--they just want the information, and they'll figure out a strategy later.
But you can always ask... and make yourself look awesome and forward thinking to mgmt. (when really, you just want to CYA so you don't get yelled at for neglecting to enable that monitoring rule for Widgets 5 next week).
Standardize. Simplify. Automate.

Migration of Transfer Rules ( Create Transformation)

Iam loading master data using direct update through 3.5 datasource. Now i want to migrate the data-source as well as the transfer rules.
First thing i do is right click on the transfer rules Additional Functions--> Create transformation
I get the following message
" Initial error occurred during generation of the transformation "
Message no. RSTRAN667
I tried deleting the transfer rules and recreating it, i get the same problem. I think first i need to create transformation against the transfer rules then i need to migrate the datasource.
I also tried just migrating the datasource and the transfer rules are gone.
The same procedure i tried with Business Content master data datasource and that one works.
Note: we are on Suport pack 12.
Please let me know if iam missing anything.
Your suggestions are highly appreciated..
Thanks

Thanks for your message..
But the thing iam doing is Iam migrating 3.5 stuff to 7.0 iam not creating transformations on the datasource.
In order to attain that migration ,first iam migrating the transfer rules as iam using direct update for master data. While iam doing that Iam getting the error message.
Voodi I'll look at that option and see if i can accomplish my migration by first migrating DS and then transfer rules....
But did u get this message for direct update of the master data...
I tried creating a generic master datasource even for that one also iam getting the same message ...while migrating the transfer rules....

Spool not generated when creating the TO from TR

Hello,
I am facing a issue while creating Transfer order. My scenario is like below:
1) Create Goods issue MB1A with two items
2) Create Transfer order from Material document
3) TO is created with 2 items
4) But spool is generated only for one item.
As per my analysis, the TO line item with storage unit which starts with 3* gives a spool while the second item with storage unit which starts 9* does not generate a spool.
But when I print the TO manually in LT31, I am able to see the spool for both items.
Please help me if you have any idea.
Thanks & Regards,
Sainath

Hello,
Please see the attached spool output when TO is printed manually LT31.
However, when the TO is printed automatically, one spool will be displayed in SP02.
Please let me know if you need any more clarifications.
Thanks,
Sainath

Automatic Inspection lot not generated for Inspection lot origin 12

Hi all,
I am not able to trigger the automatic Inspection lot for General Delivery i.e Inspection lot origin 12.
The scenario is, I am creating the STO ( Inter company stock transfer) and against the same STO i am creating the delivery but after delivery inspection lot is not generated. In the material master correct inspection type is maintained also the mvt type 641 is active for QM. The inspection lot origin is assigned to the delivery type in the configuration but still i am not able to generate the inspection lot.
Please let me know i am missing something?
Regards

Hi,
You are missing 1 Config
Quality Management
Quality Inspection > Inspection Lot Processing > Inspection Lot Creation > Inspection at Shipping (Tcode OQL8)
mantain inspection origen agenist Delivery type u are using.
also you need to create Sales Info record(QV51)
I hope all other settings are OK then it should work
Edited by: Jayashankardm on Jan 6, 2010 9:59 PM

All fields are not visible while creating transformation

Hi experts,
I am trying to create transformaion between a LO datasource and DSO designed by me. In R3, in RSA6 I can see more than 45 fields but while creating transformation only 30 fields are available.
I tried by replicating the datasource multiple times but no change.
kindly suggest where I am doing wrong.
thanks and regards,
rajesh.

Hi Rajesh, Please follow the follwing steps:
Goto RSA6, select your data source and then click on change and save button.
this will take you to transfer structure. There check the fiels you want to see have hide check box or not. If yes then un hide them. Then save the transfer structure.
Execute the datasource in RSA3. You should be able to see the filds you have unhide in previous step.
replicate the data source in in BW
Goto transfomation in change mode and then to routine. Now you will be able to see the fileld in the routine.

Delete rule not being generated in DDL

Hi,
I've only recently started using SQL Developer Data Modeler (coming from the Designer world), and it's been a good learning experience. There's a piece that I can't seem to figure out though, and it's related to the generation of DDL for foreign keys. In all my models (logical, relational, physical, I have the Delete Rule set to "Restrict". This isn't just the default preference I'm talking about, when I actually drill down to the properties of the FK, it says that the delete rule is restrict. However, when I generate the DDL, no delete rule is generated. The only option generated is NOT DEFERRABLE.
There are two issues with this:
1) The rule isn't going into the DB unless I manually alter the DDL, and
2) Every time I re-import the DB to generate ALTER statements, the comparison detects that the rule in the DB (NO ACTION) is different than the rule in the model (RESTRICT), so it deletes and re-generates the FK. However, it re-generates it still not having the delete rule set, so it doesn't fix the problem.
Is this a known bug, or is there some way of telling the program to generate the delete rule in DDL that I'm missing? I should add I'm using version 3.1.1.703.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Mike
Edited by: user10832262 on Apr 12, 2012 9:53 AM

I did some more research and I think I was completely misunderstanding Oracle's implementation of delete rules. Now I believe that Oracle implements the "RESTRICT" option in SQL Developer Data Modeler as "No Action", which is the default option, hence why no DDL option is generated. However, it would still be nice if Data Modeler could detect this fact when comparing two models. What I mean it, if comparing an Oracle DB to a model, treat Restrict and No Action as the same, and thus don't attempt to re-generate the DDL for this "difference". For now, I'll just change the action on my models to No Action, and this should resolve the issue.

While i am creating my business rule i am not able to connect the planning

while i am creating my business rule i am not able to connect the planning application and database?I dont know what is the reason?

Make sure you log into the planning application before logging into EAS.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Change pointers are not generated when creating a material master

Dear Experts,
Change pointers are not generated when creating a material master.
However, when a change is made to the already created material, the change pointers are created according the fields in BD52.
Am I missing any settings?
I need to create change pointers immediately when I create the material master in MM01.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Shetty

did you follow the steps given in
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/4a/6dcbe9c95261a3e10000000a421937/frameset.htm

Automatic Time Card Generation not generating Time Card

Hi,
I am running the program 'Automatic Time Card Generation'. The log file showing the message
'The process did not generate any timecards for the Payroll, Payroll Period selected'.
And there is no time card for the given Payroll month.
Any suggestion for this.
Many many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Subrat

Please check metalink note 282547.1 to see it is relevant to your issue

HBR rule not appearing in Planning application after has been created.

Hello All,
I am having an issue with HBR rule with Planning application. I´ve created a new rule and after set its location and access privileges when I log into Planning, the rule does not appear.
Someone could help on that ?
Thanks,
Alvaro

Are the Database server and applications server in different time zones?
When the database server and web application server are in different time zones, the HBRCacheEvents will be deleted the moment entries (new change events) are written to it. Planning also has a HBR engine that keeps polling HBRCacheEvents table for new events and delete old events to update the cache on the fly.
A Planning Web service restart will force the cache to be refreshed and thus the changes to be visible after this restart.
To solve this, you will need to either move one of the servers to be in same timezone as the other, or to anticipate the changes by scheduling restarts more frequently.
Refer: Planning Web Services Requires Restart to Show Changes to Business Rules or New Business Rules (Doc ID 1228673.1)
HTH-
Jasmine.

Creating Transformations -- Automatic Rules not Generating

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for