Creation of SAP Query in SQ02 with Single Table With Condition

Hi All,
I want to Create SAP Query in SQ02 using single Table MCHA.
ii) I dont want all entries of MCHA Table I mean , I have to apply some Condition on this Table.
i.e Suppose I am having actual data in MCHA table is like this for Material M1.
Plant    Material   Batch   BatchCreationdate
P1          M1         B1       20.06.2007
P2          M1         B1       04.05.2009
P3          M1         B1       04.05.2009
But I want the Output of SAP Query is like this:
   Material   Batch   BatchCreationdate
      M1         B1       20.06.2007
That is irrespective of Plant if Material & Batch are equal ---> 1st record with Lowest date shoud get at the output.
Please help me How write the code on single table in the SAP Query.
Thanks,
Kiran Manyam

Hi,
Your query should be like this:
Select MATNR CHARG HSDAT
from MCHA
into table t_mcha
where matnr = Materlal number from selection screen.
The structure of t_mcha should contain the fields that you select.
Then sort the table by date ascending
Sort t_mcha by HSDAT.
Hope this solves your problem.
Thanks,
Sowmya

Similar Messages

SAP Query: Duplicte records after joining table CSKT

Guru's,
We have created a query in SQ02 for Z table which has fields with KOKRS and KOSTL as well.
Ztable fields:
PLAN_TYPE
PLAN_PROCESS
KOKRS
KOSTL
We want to display cost center description. SO joining this Z table with CSKT(KOKRS,KOSTL). We are getting duplicate records in output because CSKT has duplicate KOSTL.To solve this, we want fetch Latest KOSTL comparing DATBI GE SY-DATUM.
Can anybody help us how to code this logic in Query. I have gone thru most of the SDN threads but could not find the answer.
Please help us.
Thanks in Advace.
Shreyansh

Moderator message - Duplicate post locked

Will there performance improvement over separate tables vs single table with multiple partitions?

Will there performance improvement over separate tables vs single table with multiple partitions? Is advisable to have separate tables than having a single big table with partitions? Can we expect same performance having single big table with partitions? What is the recommendation approach in HANA?

Suren,
first off a friendly reminder: SCN is a public forum and for you as an SAP employee there are multiple internal forums/communities/JAM groups available. You may want to consider this.
Concerning your question:
You didn't tell us what you want to do with your table or your set of tables.
As tables are not only storage units but usually bear semantics - read: if data is stored in one table it means something else than the same data in a different table - partitioned tables cannot simply be substituted by multiple tables.
Looked at it on a storage technology level, table partitions are practically the same as tables. Each partition has got its own delta store & can be loaded and displaced to/from memory independent from the others.
Generally speaking there shouldn't be too many performance differences between a partitioned table and multiple tables.
However, when dealing with partitioned tables, the additional step of determining the partition to work on is always required. If computing the result of the partitioning function takes a major share in your total runtime (which is unlikely) then partitioned tables could have a negative performance impact.
Having said this: as with all performance related questions, to get a conclusive answer you need to measure the times required for both alternatives.
- Lars

Deadlock when updating different rows on a single table with one clustered index

Deadlock when updating different rows on a single table with one clustered index. Can anyone explain why?
<event name="xml_deadlock_report" package="sqlserver" timestamp="2014-07-30T06:12:17.839Z">
<data name="xml_report">
<value>
<deadlock>
<victim-list>
<victimProcess id="process1209f498" />
</victim-list>
<process-list>
<process id="process1209f498" taskpriority="0" logused="1260" waitresource="KEY: 8:72057654588604416 (8ceb12026762)" waittime="1396" ownerId="1145783115" transactionname="implicit_transaction"
lasttranstarted="2014-07-30T02:12:16.430" XDES="0x3a2daa538" lockMode="X" schedulerid="46" kpid="7868" status="suspended" spid="262" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0"
trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2014-07-30T02:12:16.440" lastbatchcompleted="2014-07-30T02:12:16.437" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.437" clientapp="Internet Information Services" hostname="CHTWEB-CH2-11P"
hostpid="12776" loginname="chatuser" isolationlevel="read uncommitted (1)" xactid="1145783115" currentdb="8" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128058">
<inputbuf>
UPDATE analyst_monitor SET cam_status = N'4', cam_event_data = N'sales1', cam_event_time = current_timestamp , cam_modified_time = current_timestamp , cam_room = '' WHERE cam_analyst_name=N'ABCD' AND cam_window= 2 </inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process9cba188" taskpriority="0" logused="2084" waitresource="KEY: 8:72057654588604416 (2280b457674a)" waittime="1397" ownerId="1145783104" transactionname="implicit_transaction"
lasttranstarted="2014-07-30T02:12:16.427" XDES="0x909616d28" lockMode="X" schedulerid="23" kpid="8704" status="suspended" spid="155" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0"
trancount="2" lastbatchstarted="2014-07-30T02:12:16.440" lastbatchcompleted="2014-07-30T02:12:16.437" lastattention="1900-01-01T00:00:00.437" clientapp="Internet Information Services" hostname="CHTWEB-CH2-11P"
hostpid="12776" loginname="chatuser" isolationlevel="read uncommitted (1)" xactid="1145783104" currentdb="8" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="671088672" clientoption2="128058">
<inputbuf>
UPDATE analyst_monitor SET cam_status = N'4', cam_event_data = N'sales2', cam_event_time = current_timestamp , cam_modified_time = current_timestamp , cam_room = '' WHERE cam_analyst_name=N'12345' AND cam_window= 1 </inputbuf>
</process>
</process-list>
<resource-list>
<keylock hobtid="72057654588604416" dbid="8" objectname="CHAT.dbo.analyst_monitor" indexname="IX_Clust_scam_an_name_window" id="lock4befe1100" mode="X" associatedObjectId="72057654588604416">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process9cba188" mode="X" />
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process1209f498" mode="X" requestType="wait" />
</waiter-list>
</keylock>
<keylock hobtid="72057654588604416" dbid="8" objectname="CHAT.dbo.analyst_monitor" indexname="IX_Clust_scam_an_name_window" id="lock18ee1ab00" mode="X" associatedObjectId="72057654588604416">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process1209f498" mode="X" />
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process9cba188" mode="X" requestType="wait" />
</waiter-list>
</keylock>
</resource-list>
</deadlock>
</value>
</data>
</event>

To be honest, I don't think the transaction is necessary, but the developers put it there anyway. The select statement will put the result cam_status
into a variable, and then depends on its value, it will decide whether to execute the second update statement or not. I still can't upload the screen-shot, because it says it needs to verify my account at first. No clue at all. But it is very simple, just
like:
Clustered Index Update
[analyst_monitor].[IX_Clust_scam_an_name_window]
cost: 100%
By the way, for some reason, I can't find the object based on the associatedObjectId listed in the XML
<keylock hobtid="72057654588604416" dbid="8" objectname="CHAT.dbo.analyst_monitor"
indexname="IX_Clust_scam_an_name_window" id="lock4befe1100" mode="X" associatedObjectId="72057654588604416">
For example:
SELECT * FROM sys.partition WHERE hobt_id = 72057654588604416
This return nothing. Not sure why.

Issue in transaction code creation for sap query report .

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement to create transaction codes for sap query reports. I found two ways to create transaction code for sap query report
1) By Generating program for sap query report and creation of transaction code for that generated Program. in tcode.
2) By using parameter transaction options in start object of se93
What are the difference between creation of these two ways. Please specify the advantages and disadvantages of both methods.
Regards,
Suneel Kumar Uggina.

Hi Jogeswara Rao,
But I am getting problem while transporting form development system to the production system. After transporting to Production system I have used the code created in development system, but it is giving Error ' No Program Found for that Transaction Code. And I would like to know on what conditions should I have to use the First one and as well as a second one in sap query reports.
Thank You,
Suneel Kumar Uggina.

Selecting data from single table with different condition in single query

Hi everybody...
I have one table with col1, col2, col3, col4, col5... as columns.
I want to select col1, col2, col3 with condition (x=y and a=b and c=d)
I want to select col4, col5 with condition (x=y and a=b and m=n )
in single query...
Thanx for ur help

Given this data set...
SQL> select * from oddity
2 /
      COL1       COL2       COL3       COL4       COL5 A X C M
         1          2          3          4          5 B Y   M
         1          2          3          4          5 A Y C N
         1          2          3          4          5 A Y D M
         1          2          3          4          5 A Y D N
         1          2          3          4          5 B Y D N
         1          2          3          4          5 B Y D U
6 rows selected.
SQL>The following query meets the requirements. Of course, the requirements as stated are incomplete. I ahave assumed that we select all five columns if C=D andM=N.
SQL> SELECT decode(c, 'D', col1, '0') AS col1
2         , decode(c, 'D', col2, '0') AS col2
3         , decode(c, 'D', col3, '0') AS col3
4          , decode(m, 'N', col4, '-8') AS col4
5           , decode(m, 'N', col5, '-8') AS col5
6 FROM oddity
7 WHERE a = 'B'
8 AND x = 'Y'
9 /
      COL1       COL2       COL3       COL4       COL5
         0          0          0         -8         -8
         1          2          3          4          5
         1          2          3         -8         -8
SQL> Cheers, APC

SAP Query (SQ01/SQ02/SQ3)

Hi Experts,
I have created query (SQ01/SQ02/SQ03) to display below fields: Hazard Code, Device Location Number, Hazard Code Description, Loc. Created by, Loc. Created on Date.
Now in the output list I want to display a summary of all the count of records by the key characteristic for the query. For example, the Device Location by Hazard Codes query should give us a summary of the count of all device locations per each hazard code.
Practical Scenario:
Device Location Hazard Code
40002748              01
40002751              05
40002481              07
40002746              04
40002749              04
40002994              01
Then in this case it should either display additional third column or additional row saying:
Device Location Hazard Code
40002748              01
40002994              01
Total Hazard Count: 2
40002746              04
40002749              04
Total Hazard Count: 4
40002751              05
40002481              07
or
Device Location Hazard Code Total Count
40002748              01
40002994              01                 2
40002746              04
40002749              04                 2
40002751              05                 1
40002481              07                 1
I checked statistic tab present in SQ01 also URL [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/d2/cb4256455611d189710000e8322d00/frameset.htm] but still I am not able to figure out how to display this data.
Please let me know.
Thanks

Hi,
If you're getting the output in ALV Display, you can simply click on the location column & then click on the Sub-Total button on the ALV toolbar, it will sort all the records according to the location (1 or 2 or...) & give you the total/count of the particular location.
For any further clarification, let me know.
Prateek

Question regarding SAP query (SQ01& SQ02)

Hello everyone,
I have been assigned a task of creating a SAP query in SQ01. The report requires me to incorporate a drill down functionality.
i.e. when I double click on a material I should be able to see the components of that material.
My question is "Is it possible to incorporate a drill down functionality in a Query through SQ01".
If yes then how.
Please provide me with some documentations or example codes for this.
Regards,
Deepti Jain.

Deepti,
There are 2 ways to get the output From SAP query.
1.Under record processing :
      if you don't write any code in Start of selection event for output
     (WRITE statements) we can not have any control on that.
2. Under start of selection event :
     If you write any code in START OF SELECTION event like
     get the data in internal table and loop the internal table
     In loop WRITE statement to display with format and try to use
    Interactive report commands Here. I think it will work fine.

Question in SAP QUERY- SQ01,SQ02,SQ03

Hi SAP QUERY Experts,
I have a question for the query. Is it possible using a interface parameter for report-to-report interface? I mean when I double click on one the data record of query, I want to transfer the key information of this record to the query or report or transaction as parameters. Is it possible? If yes, could you tell me how?
This is on SQ01, SQ02,SQ03
Thanks and Regards
Saravana

hi all,
i am having one abap standard query, i have to modify that one and i have to include another colum which needs the requirment.
07 Depreciation /SAPQUERY/AM07 ADA FIAA - DEPRECIATION
the above i mentioned is the query, how ever i tryed this standared to copy but i am not able to connect infoset and all stuff.
pls guide me how to insert additional colum in that standard report or query.
pls guide me
thanks and regards,
sai

Hide columns for ALV list output in SAP Query SQ01/SQ02

Hi All,
I have a requirement to hide the columns which are empty in sap query SQ01 alv list output.
Please let me know this functionality available in Query (SQ01) like normal reports
Regards,
Venkat

Hi,
We just can't make changes in this case as this are all system generated programs.
WE have to write our own reports to make things flexible to match our requirements.
Things you are asking is not possible.
Regards,
Suvendu

Transport request for SAP Query - SQ01, SQ02, SQ03

Hi Experts,
I have a doubt, Whether we can have request for SAP Query which have created from Transaction SQ01.If Yes then How to do that....?
Thanks in Advance,
Chetan Joshi

Hi,
Use the program RSAQR3TR
Thanks
Naren

SAP Query - Need to join 3 Tables via outer join

Hi,
I need to join 3 Tables using SAP Query. I wish an OUTER JOIN to be performed for the table join.
For Example:
Table 1 has 1000 Entries           Field A             Field B
Table 2 has 300 Entries             Field A            Field C
Table 3 has 100 Entries             Field A           Field D
The normal Join (INNER JOIN) gives me only the records that exists in all the 3 Tables.
But what i need is:
In the above example, If one entry in Table 1 has no matching records in Table 2 / Table 3, there should be an output entry in the SAP Query like
Field A            Field B              Field C            Field D
xxxx              yyyy                  Blank             Blank
If there is a common record that exists in the tables, that record should appear in the same entry in the Query output.
Field A            Field B              Field C            Field D
xxxx              yyyy                  zzzz              aaaa
In this way, there should be a minimum of 1000 entries (Largest no of records in the Tables joined). More than 1000 records in the Query output depends on the number of common records.
Kindly help if you have come across such a scenario.
thanks & regds
sriram

Hi
Please join the outer join as below
Table1 with Field A to Table 2 Field A-----outer join
Table1 with Field A to Table 3 Field A------outer join
then you get the out put as per your requirement
Regards
Damu

What is the best approach to handle multiple FK with single table.

If two tables are joined with each other with more than one ways, for example
MAIN table is (col1, col2,....coln, person_creator_id, person_modifier_id)
PERSON table is (person_id, name, address,........ phone) etc
At database level PERSON_CREATOR_FK and PERSON_MODIFIER_FK are defined.
Objective is to create a report that shows
col1, col2...coln, person creator name, person modifier name
If above two objects are imported with FKs in a EUL and discoverer plus is used to create above report. On first inclusion of person name discoverer plus will ask you to pick the join (provided the checkbox to disable this feature is not checked). Once you pick 'person creator' join it will never allow you to pick person modifier name.
One solution is two create a custom folder with query like
select col1, col2,...coln,
pc.name, pc.address,.... pc.phone
pm.name, pm.address,.... pm.phone
from main m,
person pc,
person pm
where m.person_id_creator = pc.person_id
and m.person_id_modifier = pm.person_id
Second solution is to import the PERSON folder twice in EUL (optionally named one as perosn_creator and other as person_modifier) and manually define one join per table. i.e. join MAIN with PERSON_CREATOR on person_creator_fk and join MAIN with PERSON_MODIFIER table using person_modifier_fk.
Now discoverer plus will let you drag Name from each person folder without needing to resolve multiple joins.
Question is, what approach is better OR is there a better way?
With solution 1 you will not be able to use functions on folder items.
With solution 2 there is a EUL design overhead of including same object multiple times and then manually defining all join (or deleting unwanted joins), and this could be a problem when you have person_modifier and person_creator in nearly all tables. It could be more complicated if person table is further linked other tables and users want to see that information too. (for instance, if person address is stored in LOCATION table joined with location_id and user want to see both creator address and modifier address....now you will have to create multiple LOCATION folders).
A third solution could be to register a function in discoverer that return person name when person_id is passed. This will work perfectly for above requirement but a down side is the report will run slower if they need filters on person names (then function will be used in where clause). Also, this solution is very specific to above scenario, it will not work if you want the report developer the freedom to pick any attribute from person table (lets say, person table contain 50 attributes then its not a good idea to register 50 functions).
Any comments/suggestion will be appreciated.
thanks

Hi
In a roundabout way you have really answered your own question :-)
In my opinion, the best approach, although by all means not the only approach - see below) would be to have the object loaded as two folders with one join going to the first folder and the second join to the other folder. You would of course name the folders appropriately.
Here's a workflow that I use all of the time and one that I teach when I'm giving Discoverer Administrator training. It might help you:
1. Bring in the PERSON folder to begin with
2. Make all necessary adjustments to bring it up to deployment standard. These adjustments would be: folder name (E.g PERSON_CREATOR), item names, item placement, default positions, default aggregation and so on.
3. Create or assign the required lists of values
4. Create any required calculations
5. Create any required conditions
6. Create the first join from this folder to MAIN.
7. Click on the heading for the folder and press CTRL-C.
8. Click on the heading for the business area and press CTRL-V. A second copy of the folder, complete with all of the adjustments you made earlier will be inserted into the business area.
Note: joins are not copied, everything else is.
9. Rename this folder to say PERSON_MODIFIED
10. Rename the items as appropriate
11. Add a join from this folder to MAIN - you're done
Other ideas that I have used and work well would be to use a database view or create a complex folder. Either will work, In both cases you would need to join on some other column other than the ones you referred earlier.
I hope this helps
Best wishes
Michael

SAP QUERY using ASSHR and ASSOB tables

We currently have SAP query that reports on additional payments (Info type 0015). The user wants to report the cost center held on the cost assignment (Tables ASSOB and ASSHR).
The existing query uses infoset created using PNP logical database.
How do I add or join the ASSOB and ASSHR tables to Info type 0015 to report the cost center?
Thanks in advance
Shamshudin

Hi Sham
You may need to create custom fields in the infoset and create some code to pull out and display details from ASSHR and ASSOB corresponding to the ifnotype record.

Issue with single table hash cluster

I'm still learning lots about html db so please do bear with me...
I have a table that is part of a single table hash cluster. The cluster and table are created like so:
create cluster webmon.owm_system
db_id number(3),
env_id number(3)
size 171
hashkeys 1009
single table
pctfree 2
pctused 96;
create table webmon.owm_system
tier_id number(3) not null,
host_id number(3) not null,
port number(4) not null,
sid varchar2(8) not null,
admin_user varchar2(32) not null,
admin_auth varchar2(48) not null,
primary_dba_id number(3) not null,
secondary_dba_id number(3) not null,
primary_bac_id number(3) not null,
secondary_bac_id number(3) not null,
version_id number(3) not null,
log_mode_id number(3) not null,
db_id number(3) not null,
env_id number(3) not null,
admin_conn varchar2(32) null,
constraint owm_system_pk primary key (db_id, env_id)
cluster webmon.owm_system
db_id,
env_id
);I have created a form (and report) to view and edit the data in the table. When I click the "Apply Changes" button on the form after editing data, I get an error. The SQL that is sent to the database is incorrect.
Here is the (reformatted) incorrect SQL that is sent (captured in a database trace file):
update
"WEBMON"."OWM_SYSTEM"
set
"SECONDARY_DBA_ID" = :DML_BV0001,
"DB_ID" = :DML_BV0002,
"DB_ID" = :DML_BV0003, /* This should not be here */
"ENV_ID" = :DML_BV0004,
"ENV_ID" = :DML_BV0005, /* This should not be here */
"HOST_ID" = :DML_BV0006,
"PORT" = :DML_BV0007,
"SID" = replace(:DML_BV0008,'%null%',null),
"ADMIN_USER" = replace(:DML_BV0009,'%null%',null),
"ADMIN_AUTH" = replace(:DML_BV0010,'%null%',null),
"ADMIN_CONN" = replace(:DML_BV0011,'%null%',null),
"VERSION_ID" = :DML_BV0012,
"LOG_MODE_ID" = :DML_BV0013,
"TIER_ID" = :DML_BV0014,
"PRIMARY_DBA_ID" = :DML_BV0015,
"PRIMARY_BAC_ID" = :DML_BV0016,
"SECONDARY_BAC_ID" = :DML_BV0017
where
"DB_ID" = :p_rowid
and
"ENV_ID" = :p_rowid2Why are the DB_ID and ENV_ID columns in the statement twice? That is the error.
Now, if I create the table as just a basic, non-clustered table like this:
create table webmon.owm_system
tier_id number(3) not null,
host_id number(3) not null,
port number(4) not null,
sid varchar2(8) not null,
admin_user varchar2(32) not null,
admin_auth varchar2(48) not null,
primary_dba_id number(3) not null,
secondary_dba_id number(3) not null,
primary_bac_id number(3) not null,
secondary_bac_id number(3) not null,
version_id number(3) not null,
log_mode_id number(3) not null,
db_id number(3) not null,
env_id number(3) not null,
admin_conn varchar2(32) null,
constraint owm_system_pk primary key (db_id, env_id)
);Everything works as expected. The (correct) SQL sent in this case is:
update
"WEBMON"."OWM_SYSTEM"
set
"SECONDARY_DBA_ID" = :DML_BV0001,
"DB_ID" = :DML_BV0002,
"ENV_ID" = :DML_BV0003,
"HOST_ID" = :DML_BV0004,
"PORT" = :DML_BV0005,
"SID" = replace(:DML_BV0006,'%null%',null),
"ADMIN_USER" = replace(:DML_BV0007,'%null%',null),
"ADMIN_AUTH" = replace(:DML_BV0008,'%null%',null),
"ADMIN_CONN" = replace(:DML_BV0009,'%null%',null),
"VERSION_ID" = :DML_BV0010,
"LOG_MODE_ID" = :DML_BV0011,
"TIER_ID" = :DML_BV0012,
"PRIMARY_DBA_ID" = :DML_BV0013,
"PRIMARY_BAC_ID" = :DML_BV0014,
"SECONDARY_BAC_ID" = :DML_BV0015
where
"DB_ID" = :p_rowid
and
"ENV_ID" = :p_rowid2The "real" system in question has a fairly large number of single table hash clusters. I'm leary of continuing my explorations if there is a problem with using single table hash clusters. On the other hand, I'm quite open to the idea that I've done something wrong!
Any pointers? Is there anyway to change the SQL that is being generated when using the single table hash cluster? More information needed?
Thanks,
Mark

Mark,
Can't help with the hash table problem but as a method of dealing with it you could just make a procedure to manage the table.
Pass the value of :REQUEST (matches value of button) in and you'll be able to modify the tables.
procedure manage_owm_system (p_request varchar2,db_id number ...)is
begin
case p_request
when 'CREATE' then
insert
into ....
when 'SAVE' then
update .....
else
raise_application_error(-20001,'Unkown request');
end case;
end;
put that in a plsql reqion after submit
begin
manage_owm_system(p_request=>:REQUEST,p_dbid=>:P1_DBID .......);
end;
You need to create something similar , with out parameters, to populate the items when the pags loads.
Chris

Creation of SAP Query in SQ02 with Single Table With Condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for