Cross-company code functionality using Idoc type FIDCCP02

Hello,
I have a problem I need to use an IDoc to create incoming invoices from a legacy system, but there are 2 functionalities that need to exist.
1.- Extended withholding taxes.
2.- Cross-company code.
I have been using the basic type FIDCCP02, because it was easy to use extended withholding taxes.
But now the functional team requested us to implement the functionality Cross-company code.
I did some test using ACC_INVOICE_RECEIPT03, where just specifying 2 different company codes at item level, SAP will create 2 different invoices one for each company code) ,
The problem here is that I need both functionality, but only use 1 Idoc type. Do you know how can I solve this problem??

Imelda ,
I am also trying to use FIDCCP02 Idoc for Cross-Company code functionality , and we are not able to do it ..
I saw this message in SDN posted by you last year but it was not answered , hence was wondering if you were at some point of time able to get any answer on this one OR did you find any solution by yourself on this issue.
I would also like to use Cross-company code functionality using FIDCCP02 , so please let me know if you have anything on this one .
Would appreciate your reply .
Thanks,
Ashutosh Chitrao

Similar Messages

Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Dear Forum,
I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys.
In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
Best regards,
Kim Hjorth Poulsen

Hi Srinu,
Thank You for a prompt feedback.
I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
It is also costing cross company as intended.
The itemization looks like below.
and the cost component structure looks like below.
Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
Best regards,
Kim

Cross-company code correspondence

Hello
I am trying to run a cross company code correspondace using F.27.
1) I have flagged my correspondance as cross company.
2) Then I have assigned for correspondence
company B to company A
Company C to company A
3) I have configured my correspondences: print program, sapscript
When I run the F.27, which company code should I enter for a select option A, B and C, A B and C.
SAP rejects companies B and C, message FB614 "Do not select a dependent company code"
And when I run it without any company, I have several statements printed instead of 1.
Any idea ?
Regards

To close the thread...
It seems that customers have to be created however in the main company. Which is not what I want.
The printing program was adapted to cover the case and just produce 1 statement per customer.

Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

Hello Guys,
I have a problem related to cross company code transaction.
In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
Can anyone help on this?
Thanks
Rafael B.

Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
The document was created in 2010.
This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
More suggestions?
Regards.
Rafael

Prevent cross-company code postings for certain document type

Hi all!
I am looking for a possibility to prevent users from posting a "cross-company code posting" just for a certain document type.
I checked validation rules and BTEs but without success. Do you have an idea?
Thanks for any support.
Michael

Thanks for your reply. I have already tried to use a validation rule, but without success.
It did not work as the relevant field "New company code" (NEWBK) in not part of BKPF or BSEG, but (only) of structure RF05A. Thus, I cannot use the field in a validation rule.
Or is there a way to make RF05A fields available for use in validation rules?
Regards, Michael

How to use Cross Company Code document number as Reffrence.

Hi
Actually user wants to post the same debit credit line items with Editing the amounts which he has posted last month
So i suggested him to use post refference of the previous month document number.
Since that is Cross company document number. There is no source to give in T.Code FBR2. There is a fecility to give only document number of a company code not cross company code.
Assume that there are 3 company's involved in that document.
company X --- 25 line items
company Y -- 75 line items
Company Z -- 100 line items
Since he given in header data X Co code it has generated the Cross company code document number 1000X 08 ( which means 1000 is doc.number X is company code 08 is year. This is sap standard cross company code doc number format)
and individual document number is
X - 1000
Y- 2000
Y- 3000
If he post with the reffrence of X company only 25 lines will come remaining 175 line he as to post manually.
If he take Y Doc number only 75 lines will come
If he take Z Doc number only 100 lines will come
To bring all lines there is no provision to give Cross company Doc number.
Please advice how to use cross company doc number as refference.
Tks
Shivaji

Hi guru
This is answered
Thanks
shivaji

Cross Company Code purchasing

Hi,
Please help me to concept of Cross Company Code purchasing .
I need a Document regarding this or configuration setting , its requirement from one of our client.
So pls send me some document about the Cross Company Code Transaction.
Thanks
Mukesh

Hi,
Refer to the link given below.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4d/4b9036dfe4b703e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
Even when the plants involved in a stock transfer belong to different company codes, you can use conventional methods to transfer the stock:
By transferring the stock between plants in one or two steps
By carrying out a stock transport order without the delivery function via Shipping
By carrying out a stock transport order with the delivery function via Shipping
In these cases, the value of the transfer posting is posted to a company code clearing account in both the issuing and the receiving plants. The stock transfer is posted at the valuation price of the material in the issuing plant.
Stock Transport Order with Delivery Via Shipping and Billing Document/Invoice
You can carry out stock transfers with the delivery and billing function. In this procedure, the stock is transferred in the form of a sale between two plants.
Stock transfers that include deliveries and billing documents/invoices are only possible between plants belonging to different company codes.
If you want to carry out a cross-company-code stock transport order with delivery but without a billing document, you must set the Relevant for Billing (data element FKREL) indicator in Customizing of the item type to "blank" (Not relevant for billing).
When you use the delivery function in Shipping, the whole transaction - from the delivery through billing and invoice verification - is reflected in the system. The following Shipping functions are available for this:
Delivery:
For example, planning shipping activities, picking, packing
Billing:
For example, price determination
Before you can use a stock transport order with the delivery function and a billing document, the plant must be assigned to a vendor. You maintain the vendor - plant assignment in the vendor master record.
If a user enters a vendor when creating a stock transport order, the plant is automatically copied from the vendor master record.
A stock transport order with delivery and billing is a mixture of a standard purchase order and a stock transport order: as in the standard purchase order, when items are entered (standard items with no item category) price determination is carried out and shipping data established; as in the stock transport order, the transfer of stocks from one location to another is monitored.
Stock Transport Order with Valuated and Non-Valuated Sales Order Stock
When entering goods issues for cross-company-code stock transport orders, you can work with both valuated and non-valuated sales order stock (E) using the one-step procedure (movement type 645) and the two-step procedure (movement type 643). In the MRP view of the material master record (MRP 4) you define from which stock material is to be withdrawn by selecting the Dependent requirements indicator for individual and collective requirements. There are three options:
Indicator set to Blank (individual and collective requirements): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 1 (individual requirements only): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 2 (collective requirements only): material is removed from unrestricted-use standard stock
Prices
In Purchasing, the price of the material in question is determined in the usual manner (from the info record, for example).
In SD, pricing is also carried out as normal during the billing process.
Your company has to maintain settings in the Customizing system determining whether stock transfers between two plants should be with or without billing.
You can also determine whether individual users can carry out stock transfers, for example, with or without billing or in either of the two ways.
If you choose Purchase Order ® Create ® Stock Transfer (i.e. a stock transport order without billing) and stock transfer with billing has been defined for the plants in Customizing, a message appears indicating that you should create a standard purchase order.
Regards
Ravi Shankar.
Edited by: RAVI SHANKAR H.N on Jan 12, 2009 10:45 AM

CO-PA issue in Thirds Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

Hi,
In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost. CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
Waiting for the help.
Best regards,
Joby

Have you considered using this user-exit?
User Exits in the SAPFV45PF0E and SAPFV45PF0C Programs
EXIT_SAPFV45P_001
You can use this user exit to decide whether intercompany billing data is used in the profitability segment for cross-company code sales, or whether the data comes from external billing (external customer, sales data from the selling company code.
Thanks,
Ben

How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill

Hi All,
Can any one help me, How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill of Exchnage Payments with Automatic Payment Program?
Regards
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
This is what you need to do to configure Cross Company Code Vendor Payments.
Execute transaction code OBYA, when prompted, type in 1st coy code, say A and then 2nd coy code, say B. This would take you to the "Maintain FI Configuration: Automatic Posting - Clearing Accounts" screen.
In the first frame, where you have
Posted in : A
Cleared Against : B
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
In the second Frame
Posted in : B
Cleared Against : A
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
So, if you are using the Customer/Vendor approach, company A must be set up as both a Customer(Use Txn Code XD01) and a Vendor(USe Txn Code XK01) in Company B and vice versa.
Once you have completed this set-up, you can then use transaction F.13 and/or F13E to carry out your automatic clearing. Alternatively, whenever Payment Run is executed via transaction code F110, this would automatically clear out the payables and receivables in each company code.
However, if you intend to use the G/L approach, then the account numbers would be Inter-coy G/L account for each coy code as defined in the chart of accounts.
I hope the above helps.
Do not forget to award the points please.
Regards,
Jacob

Automatically clear the open items for a GL account cross company codes

Hi FICO experts,
Can anyone help me on the following issue urgently?
There are journal entries posted to same GL account with different company code. Is there any way to automatically clear the open items sitting in the GL account in company code A to against the open items for the same GL account in company code B.
The example is below:
Journal in company code A
Dr. 840410      $100
Cr. 111300       $100
Journal in company code B
Dr. 111301   $100
Cr. 840410      $100
Now I want to automatically clear account 840410 by using assignment or text in the journal entry.
It will be highly appreciated for any instructions.
Adele

Hello Adele Wang,
You can enter cross-company code transactions in one step in the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable, and Accounts Payable application components. This function would be used, for example, for centralized procurement or payment.
Integration:For centralized payments, each individual company code enters its own invoices separately, while a central company code pays them. When you are clearing open items, the system makes clearing entries between the company codes participating in the clearing procedure. These clearing entries represent the receivables and payables that exist between the company codes in centralized payment.
Prerequisites:You have specified which company codes are to be processed via a single company code. In this specification, you can distinguish between clearing transactions. You can therefore have different combinations of company codes for incoming and outgoing payments.
You have specified the clearing accounts that record the receivables and payables between the individual company codes. The system posts to these accounts automatically when clearing the open items.
You need to make the required settings in the activity Prepare Cross-Company Code Manual Payments in Customizing for Financial Accounting (Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Payments->Manual Outgoing Payments).
Features:For each company code, the system generates a separate clearing document. A joint transaction number marks these documents as belonging together.
Example:For a clearing transaction (incoming payment, outgoing payment), you have agreed in Customizing that if company code 0001 is specified, open items are also selected from other company codes (0002 and 0003).
Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points.
Rgds
manish
Clearing can then also be carried out if the account to be cleared has not been created in company code 0001. As long as no items have to be posted to this account in company code 0001, it is not necessary to create a master record for the account in company code 0001.
See also:

Cross company code downpayment posting error

Hi,
When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
"Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
Vendor A/c (Company A)
Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
Best regards
Shanid

Hi Atif,
Thanks again for your reply.
Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
It will be great if you give a solution for this.
Regards
Shanu

Cross Company code Transaction error

Hi,
When I am posting below Cross company code transaction getting error - Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled.
Vendor A/c - Company code1
To Bank clearing A/c - Company code2
Problem is profit center is not deriving for Vendor reconciliation A/c. We cannot make a default profit center this.
When I am posting cross company code invoice it is correclty deriving the profit center for the same reconciliation a/c.
Also I do not see any mistake in document splitting configuration.
Any help will be appreciated.
Regards
Shanu

Hi
Check the following things:
1. In KE52, the profit center entered in Bank Clearing Account Item in Co Code B is also assigned in Co Code A. Then system will allow you to post the cross co code document
2. Are you using the correct Document Type while posting the transaction. IN your Document Type Definition in OBA7, the check boxes for Inter Co posting and Trading Partner (Trading Partner only if inter co elimination is being used) have been ticked
3. You have assigned the correct item category to vendor reconcilliation account (Should be Vendor GL), Inter co Clearing account (Balance sheet Account ) and Bank Clearing account (balance sheet) have been assigned in your configuration
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
<a href="http://www.vcq.biz/">sai baba wallpaper</a>, <a href="http://www.utorrent.name/">utorrent</a>

Version 4.6c Cross Company Code Incoming payment to lockbox.

In version 4.6c I am trying to find out the correct IMG configuration for processing incoming payments to a lockbox when multiple companies are using one company for banking. Here is what I have done so far:
Here are the company codes: 2100 has house banks and lockbox set up.
0980 does not have house bank or lockbox.
OX16 - all both company codes involved are assigned to the same Company.
OBVU - Non-bank company code 0980 has 2100 set up as Paying Company Code
OBYA - Clearing accounts have been set up between 0980-2100.
OB05 - Accounting Clerk has been set up for both company codes.
OB10 - Lockbox from 2100 has been set up for 0980. Even though 0980 does not have a House bank set up, IMG Configuration did allow the lockbox and house bank for 2100 to be saved under 0980.
OB96 - Forms to be used were linked to 0980
One issue we are having is that when we attempt to set up a Customer for 0980 a field for Lockbox is required to be entered. When the 2100 Lockbox is input, an error message pops up saying that 0980 does not have a House Bank.
Can someone please explain how to complete the configuration for this type of activity in version 4.6c? Also should we be using F-28, FB05 or some other t-code to post incoming payments.

Hello,
You can post the cross company code postings even between two controlling areas. The system does not prevent to post documents between two company codes in two controlling area. Need not necessarily they should be under one operating concern. Provided you have to make sure that you have followed the following points:
In OBY6 - To company codes must be assigned to same Company, meaning that you mus thave created a Company and that company must have been assigned to these two company codes.
OBYA - You should maintain the clearing accounts in both the company codes. Meaning that you are posting one leg in one company code and the other leg in the other company. Therefore, it is required to have the missing legs in each company code.
Company Code1 - Posting Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code1 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Positng Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
OB08 - In case if the two company codes have different local (company code) currencies, you may maintain the exchange rates.
You can now go to F-02 and post a cross company code transaction giving the first leg in first company code and the second leg in second company code. Missing leg in the first company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA and the missing leg in the second company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA. That means you will have four line items overall.
The system will post three document.
Document 1 in First Company Code
Document 2 in Second Company Code
and
Document3 - Cross Company Code Document.
The cross company code document consists of the first company code document number plus company code plus last two digits of the fiscal year.
Hope this must have clarified your doubts.
Please let me know in case if you need further details.
Thanks,
Ravi

Cross-company code postings - FI validation

Hi,
We start using the cross-company code postings (transaction OBYA) between company code A and company code B and have to give authorizations both company codes to the Finance users. The idea is to have a set of G/L accounts which are allowed to be used when company code A and B are posted via cross-company code posting.
SAP recommends to implement a validation in FI to restrict the Intercompany scenatios. I attempted to create a FI validation for complete document (call-point 3) with no success:
1)
IC Rule: BSEG-BUKRS = A and BSEG-BUKRS = B and BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC rule
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
When I test it, the Intercompany clearing account configured in OBYA, and which is in ACCOUNTSET, shows up in the error message, which unwanted.
2)
IC Rule 1: BKPF-BUKRS = '0017' AND BKPF-BUKRS = '0005'
IC Rule 2: BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC Rule 1 --> IC Rule 2
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
No error message is issued at all, even if the G/L account is not in ACCOUNTSET.
Please advise what I am missing.

Hi Nitin,
Thank you for your feeback.
I just wanted to clarify that the cross-company code posting is when company code A can intitiate a posting to company code B simultaneously (for example Intercompany re-charge, cash concentration, etc.). The trigger for cross-company code posting is the company code field on the line item. If company code A is in the header (BKPF-BUKRS) and at least one document line item filled up as company code B, the system created two documents for each company code, offsetting the Intercompany clearing account, configured in OBYA.
For example:
Posting via FB50: Leading company code = company code A (BKPF-BUKRS)
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200; Company code A (as a default)
Item 2: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100; Company code B (manually changed)
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300; Company code A (as a default)
The systen creates two postings:
Posting 1: company code A
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200;
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300;
Item 2: Debit ; I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
Posting 2: company code B
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100;
Item 2: Credit;I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
The only connection between the two is the cross-company code number (BKPF-BVORG), which assigned by the system once posted, as a logical connection.
I guess we could use a dedicated document type. If that's the case, how would the validation work then?
Coudl you please share more details on the BTE option?
Thank you,
Inna

Cross company code payment - Reallocation of discount

I have a peculiar requirement and I am out of my wits to find a solution. I am confident that our Forum members will give me a solution to this.
The scenarios is like this. There are 122 company codes and there is lot of cross company code payments. Meaning one company code say '0001' pays on behalf of the other 121 company codes. At the time of payment the following enter is passed:
              In the paying company code:
             Debit Inter-company customer
             Credit External Vendor
               In the other company codes:
              Debit Expense (A cost center is assigned to this GL)
              Credit Inter-company Vendor
At the time of payment to the external vendor the following entry is passed:
             Debit External Vendor
             Credit Bank.
So far it is good. But now if the Vendors term allows discount of say 2% then at the time of payment the entry generated is :
               In the paying company code
              Debit External Vendor
              Credit Discount
              Credit Bank
           No entry in the other company codes.
In case the payment term of the vendor allows discount then the client wants the discount to be posted as follows:
                 In the paying company code
              Debit External Vendor
              Credit Inter-company customer
               (in the proportion of each company code's share of expense)
              Credit Bank
                In the other company codes
               Debit Inter-company Vendor
               Credit Expense account (the one which was originally debited)
                                                   (the same cost center should also be credited)
How can this be achieved. I know there is no standard functionality to do this. But can somebody suggest a logic for the Z program.
Thanks in advance.
Kalyan

Guys, be specific in your answers. If you do not know, please refrain from answering.
I am really sorry to state that in this site and also in other similar websites, people just answer questions without knowing what they are talking about.
I can understand, novices asking questions. But the same novices should not try to answer questions which they do not understand.
I am sorry to make these comments. But I want this to be a quality site where Practitioners can come and find real answers to questions. I am sure there will be people out their who will support my viewpoint. This will help make the forum more useful. Otherwise somebody seeking an answer to his/her question may spend hours and end up without an answer.
Kalyan

Cross-company code functionality using Idoc type FIDCCP02

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for