Cross company codes CO area

Hi,
What are the pre-requisites to be taken care seriously for a setup where more than one company codes will be assigned to a single controlling area (business in europe and India). The assigned company codes will have different currency and different fiscal varinat. One company code in europe so it has Jan to dec month in fiscal year with 12 posting periods. Other one (Indian business) has Apr- march (next year) in fiscal year variant with 13 posting period.
Thanks
Dinabandhu

Hi
In addition to the points highlighted above, I would like to highlight a few points/gaps
1. Asset closing is linked to Leading Ledger only.. You wont be able to perform any closing for the parallel ledger
2. If you plan to do LTP, you will face challenges... At one time, you can do LTP for one company code only... OMIK settings dont allow multiple company codes as the option.. I have also raised a development request with SAP a couple of years ago for this
3. With regards to planning in CO module - If you choose single controlling area, One of your companies will have to adopt the planning period as per the other company i.e. Either the Indian company will have to adopt Jan-Dec as planning period OR the European company will have to adopt Apr-Mar...Because, Planning in CO happens purely at the controlling area level
4. Period control in CO is also at Controlling area level and not company code..
5. If controlling area currency and comp code currency is different, you face challenges in using IM module as well... I dont recollect this very strongly, as I faced this problem a long time back
My personal choice is to have a separate controlling area when your geographies are different and fiscal year is different...Though the new functionalities of New GL and Parallel ledger are popularized enough, but one needs to look at the flip side of the same as well
Having separare controlling area gives you the flexibility and I dont see any drawbacks of it... You can very well draw the reports together because all report painter/BW reports allow you to customize the reports as you wish
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

  • Changing controlling area from single company code to cross company code

    Hi,
    Due to my client requirement, in the middle of the year, we need to change the controlling area from being same as company code to cross company code controlling area. Although the currency is same. We are going to create a new company code. Is the changing controlling area settings possible to do? what are the precautions and changes need to be taken?
    One more question, we need to change the company code when the new company code is created in the system in Cost Center Masters in the middle of the year. Is this possible after changing controlling area from single company code to cross company code. Right now company code is not appearing in the cost center master.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Saidarao

    Hi,
          If both companies having transaction data its not possible,Normally before defining Organisational Strucutre only we have to deside both companies is assigning same controlling are or have to maitain separately for this we have to compare the Fiscal year,Operating chart of accounts ,if both having same then we will assign both the company codes to one controlling area if these two companies having different currencies also its not a problem.When we creating Controlling Area we have to choose option of controlling area as same company code (if one company code one controlling Area) for example if you assigning two companies then we have to use cross company code cost accounting.If u need any further information let me know.
    Regards,
    Satya

  • Cross company code txn

    Hi,
    I have to create a report on cross company code transactions, can any one let me know how to do this?
    I have never worked on cross company code transactions can any one explain me about it.

    Dear Sultan,
    You can use report RFBVOR00 to display cross-company code transactions.
    Cross-Company code transactions:
    A cross-company code transaction involves two or more company codes in one business transaction. Examples:
    One company code makes purchases for other company codes (Central Procurement)
    a. One company code pays invoices for other company codes (Central Payment)
    b. One company code sells goods to other company codes
    A cross-company code transaction posts to accounts in several company codes. This cannot be done by posting only one document because a document is always assigned to exactly one company code. Instead, the system creates and posts a
    separate document in each company code involved. In order to balance debits and credits within these documents, the system generates automatic line items which are posted to clearing accounts, for payables or receivables.
    The documentswhich belong to one cross-company code transaction are linked by a common cross-company code transaction number.
    Hope the above information helps you to understand Cross - Company Code Transactions
    Regards,
    Mir

  • Cross company code validation in CO Area

    Dear All Experts,
    I am having one query regarding cross company code validation in CO area. I have ticked Cross company code validation in controlling area, and it is working perfect.
    we have total 11 company codes. 10 for US & 1 for Canada. Say 1001 to 1010 US company codes & Canda it is 1101.
    The requirement is :-
    Now client wants to post cross company code transaction within these 10 US company codes and it should not throw an error  ( Ideally which is giving right now ). It should give error only when posting to US company code transaction and Canada Cost Center or Internal Order.
    Can we restrict the company code for cross posting validation ? OR Can selected company codes set for validation indicator ?
    Experts guidance will be great on this.
    Regards,
    Sharvari Joshi.

    Dear,
    Murali.
    Thanks for your reply.
    As you said :- Validation check applies for all the company codes which are assigned to your controlling area.
    Means simply we can not apply this option to selective company codes, Right ?
    Once it is ticked it is applicable to all company codes.
    Regards,
    Sharvari Joshi.

  • *When we are doing the cross company code transaction it is hitting

    Hi Experts,
    Her my client having one requirment as follows,
    When we are doing the cross company code transaction it is hitting the wrong Gl (i.e 109999999-suspense clearing a/c)
    It should hit either (135060016-tie up control a/c or 241060001-tilaknagar industries ltd control ac) What can i do?
    Regards,
    Devendra
    Edited by: Devendraachari on Jun 30, 2010 12:07 PM
    Moderator: Give proper titles to your threads

    hI,
    check what is the gl account maintained for cross company code transactions. T.code may be OBA1
    What transactions you are doing ex: Asset transfer, vendor postings .. ..
    Regards,
    Sankar
    Edited by: Durgasankar.Innamuri on Jun 30, 2010 12:09 PM

  • Restrict cross CO area postings and allow cross company code postings

    " There are two Controlling areas CA01 and CA02, for the controlling area CA02 the field CO code validation is inactive to allow cross company code postings ie., (Cost center created in one company code can be used as cost object in other company code ) Also this allows any WBS element created in controlling area CA01 as cost object in any of the company codes assigned in controlling area CA02,
    Due to usage of WBS element which is created in CA01 controlling area as cost object in company code belongs to controlling area CA02, business is facing problem while doing the settlement run with error message " Document data for list of origins does not exist"
    So, I have activated the field Co code validation in the controlling area CA02, which stopped the usage of WBS element between controlling areas. Also this had restricted usage of cost object between company codes with in controlling area CA02.
    Now is there anyway to allow cost object usage between company codes assigned in one controlling area (CA02) and restrict usage of WBS element created in controlling area CA01 in any company code assigned in controlling area CA02.

    Hi,
    As you have already activated the Co Code validation you cant restrict that only to WBS. But you can have another option
    Use the validation process to restrict these errors
    This may help
    Regards
    Shantanu

  • Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

    Dear Friends,
    In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
    eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
    I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
    In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
    In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
    But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
    Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi
    Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
    Regards
    Shammi

  • Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

    Hello Guys,
    I have a  problem related to cross company code transaction.
    In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
    Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
    But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
    Can anyone help on this?
    Thanks
    Rafael B.

    Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
    The document was created in 2010.
    This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
    More suggestions?
    Regards.
    Rafael

  • Cross company code Stock transfer - Special procurement Key

    Hi,
    Please clear my following doubts...
    1. We have two company codes, Company code: A1 having a Plant: AP1, Company code B1- Pant BP1,
    Finished goods sold from the plant AP1 are purchased from the plant BP1, so is there is any possibility to create a special procurement key having BP1 as the delivering plant and assign the key in AP1 materials.
    2. Can i combine the two plants AP1 and BP1 for total online planning (MD01) by creating a scope of planning indicator? and run a single MRP run for both plants at a time...
    Please clarify...
    Thanks,
    JK

    JK,
    I dont think Scope Planning is problem. You can create Scope of planning combining multiple plants, use transaction OM0E.
    I doubt on Special procurement key option for STO across cross company codes, as the special setting needed in that case would be that Plant as to be created as Vendor / Customer. I would suggest to post this to MM forum for further response on this.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • CO-PA issue in Thirds Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

    Hi,
    In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost.  CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
    In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
    Waiting for the help.
    Best regards,
    Joby

    Have you considered using this user-exit?
    User Exits in the SAPFV45PF0E and SAPFV45PF0C Programs
    EXIT_SAPFV45P_001
    You can use this user exit to decide whether intercompany billing data is used in the profitability segment for cross-company code sales, or whether the data comes from external billing (external customer, sales data from the selling company code.
    Thanks,
    Ben

  • How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill

    Hi All,
    Can any one help me, How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill of Exchnage Payments with Automatic Payment Program?
    Regards
    Chandra

    Hi Chandra,
    This is what you need to do to configure <b>Cross Company Code Vendor Payments</b>.
    Execute transaction code <b>OBYA</b>, when prompted, type in 1st coy code, say A and then 2nd coy code, say B. This would take you to the "<b>Maintain FI Configuration: Automatic Posting - Clearing Accounts</b>" screen.
    In the first frame, where you have
    Posted in : A
    Cleared Against : B
    Under Receivable
    Debit Posting Key : <b>01</b>
    Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
    Under Payable
    Credit Posting Key : <b>31</b>
    Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
    In the second Frame
    Posted in : B
    Cleared Against : A
    Under Receivable
    Debit Posting Key : <b>01</b>
    Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
    Under Payable
    Credit Posting Key : <b>31</b>
    Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
    So, if you are using the <b>Customer/Vendor</b> approach, company A must be set up as both a Customer(Use Txn Code <b>XD01</b>) and a Vendor(USe Txn Code <b>XK01</b>) in Company B and vice versa.
    Once you have completed this set-up, you can then use transaction <b>F.13</b> and/or <b>F13E</b> to carry out your automatic clearing. Alternatively, whenever Payment Run is executed via transaction code <b>F110</b>, this would automatically clear out the payables and receivables in each company code.
    However, if you intend to use the G/L approach, then the account numbers would be Inter-coy G/L account for each coy code as defined in the chart of accounts.
    I hope the above helps.
    Do not forget to award the points please.
    Regards,
    Jacob

  • Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

    Dear Forum,
    I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys. 
    In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
    From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
    The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
    The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
    The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
    If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
    I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
    How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
    Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
    Best regards,
    Kim Hjorth Poulsen

    Hi Srinu,
    Thank You for a prompt feedback.
    I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
    I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
    It is also costing cross company as intended.
    The itemization looks like below.
    and the cost component structure looks like below.
    Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
    I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
    So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
    Best regards,
    Kim

  • Automatically clear the open items for a GL account cross company codes

    Hi FICO experts,
    Can anyone help me on the following issue urgently?
    There are journal entries posted to same GL account with different company code. Is there any way to automatically clear the open items sitting in the GL account in company code A to against the open items for the same GL account in company code B.
    The example is below:
    Journal in company code A
    Dr. 840410      $100
      Cr. 111300       $100
    Journal in company code B
    Dr. 111301   $100
      Cr. 840410      $100
    Now I want to automatically clear account  840410 by using assignment or text in the journal entry.
    It will be highly appreciated for any instructions.
    Adele

    Hello Adele Wang,
    You can enter cross-company code transactions in one step in the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable, and Accounts Payable application components. This function would be used, for example, for centralized procurement or payment.
    Integration:For centralized payments, each individual company code enters its own invoices separately, while a central company code pays them. When you are clearing open items, the system makes clearing entries between the company codes participating in the clearing procedure. These clearing entries represent the receivables and payables that exist between the company codes in centralized payment.
    Prerequisites:You have specified which company codes are to be processed via a single company code. In this specification, you can distinguish between clearing transactions. You can therefore have different combinations of company codes for incoming and outgoing payments.
    You have specified the clearing accounts that record the receivables and payables between the individual company codes. The system posts to these accounts automatically when clearing the open items.
    You need to make  the required settings in the activity Prepare Cross-Company Code Manual Payments in Customizing for Financial Accounting (Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Payments->Manual Outgoing Payments).
    Features:For each company code, the system generates a separate clearing document. A joint transaction number marks these documents as belonging together.
    Example:For a clearing transaction (incoming payment, outgoing payment), you have agreed in Customizing that if company code 0001 is specified, open items are also selected from other company codes (0002 and 0003).
    Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points.
    Rgds
    manish
    Clearing can then also be carried out if the account to be cleared has not been created in company code 0001. As long as no items have to be posted to this account in company code 0001, it is not necessary to create a master record for the account in company code 0001.
    See also:

  • Directly display cross company code document overview in FBL1N

    Hi Buddy
    My user wants to display cross company code document overview in FBL1N Directly, after execute.
    Instead of going FBL1N --> execute --> Vendor line item display --> once click on cross company code document number than it will take to Display document at lie item level --> once click on call up document overview (F9) than it will display cross company code document overview in FBL1N
    It suggested to user we can use FBU3 for cross company code document overview.
    But user wants in FBL1N --> execute --> Vendor line item display --> once click on cross company code document number -->than it has to  display cross company code document overview in FBL1N.
    Is there any possibility in FBL1N or ells we need to create Z. T CODE? For the same.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    asuvamsi

    Hi, Experts,
    Once i execute the report FBL1N with user's user ID, i have double click on docuement and i click on document overview(At mountain button) it is displaying the respective comapny code wise docuement overview
    if i am executing with our user ID it is displaying cross company code docuement overview once click on document overview (At mountain button)
    How it possible i have checked SU53 T.code also, there are no authorization problem for both user ID's
    Could any body please  give me suggestions on the same.
    Thanks.
    Regards
    asuvamsi
    Edited by: asuvamsi on Dec 28, 2011 11:24 AM

  • Cross company code downpayment posting error

    Hi,
    When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
    "Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
    Vendor A/c (Company A)
    Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
    Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
    Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
    Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
    How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
    Best regards
    Shanid

    Hi Atif,
    Thanks again for your reply.
    Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
    Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
    I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
    It will be great if you give a solution for this.
    Regards
    Shanu

Maybe you are looking for