Cross company invoice

Hi,
Please let me know If we use SRM, can we not post the g/l expense portion to a different company code than the one we are paying from.
Does SRM supports posting Cross company invoice
Thanks,
Manu

It's a limitation in SRM, it won't support cross company payments

Similar Messages

A reversal of a cross-company invoice posting

A reversal of a cross-company invoice posting between Austria and Germany is recorded only in one company code. It needs to be recorded in both Austria and Germany company codes.
please provide the solution

Hi,
What version of SAP do you use? If it's <= 4.7, then look at the note 611777.
Regards,
Eli

MIRO - Verify Cross Company Invoice

Hello Experts.
In transaction MIRO the system automatically detect a cross company transaction, and that's fine.
But my client, just need a cross company invoice between specific two company codes. Otherwise, the system should send and error message.
If it possible do this?
I appreciate your help.
Hector

if the clearing accounts not there in OBYA between 2 company codes then system will throw error. So dont maintain values there except for ur company codes

Account Assignment/Cross Company - Invoice on SD-Order instead of CO-PA

Dear friends,
I am currently working on an issue with a cross-company MTO production and sales process, which creates following postings:
Sales order in plant/company code 0001, production of some items in plant/CC 0002.
Delivery & intercompany invoice from 0002-->0001, posting of goods receipt and IC-revenues are done on the sales order item (ok!).
When we create the invoice to the customer in the selling CC 0001, the items which were delivered and invoiced from the production company go directly to CO-PA, but we want to see the postings on the sales order item.
As mentioned in OSS note 394481 this seems to be standard, is there a possibility to prevent the CO-PA postings and instead post them on the sales order?
I am kindly ask for your support, thank you!
Kind regards,
Andreas
PS: Account assignment categories and requirement classes/types seem to be fine...

Hello Piet,
after some further research I noticed an paragraph in OSS note 394481 which describes, that no valid CO-object exists in the invoicing comp.code.
This is the reason why the invoices are posted directly into CO-PA.
Nevertheless we miss the revenues on the sales order item for result anlaysis - the actual revenues are not taken into consideration by the result analysis due to the direct CO-PA posting. This is a follow up problem now.
Kind regards,
Andreas
Edited by: Andreas Franz Ratzenboeck on Jan 8, 2009 2:54 PM

How to post a cross-company invoice using the BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT?

Hi
I would like to post an inter-company invoice using the BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT.
There is a comp_code in the header strusture. The BAPI's documentation says that this is possible and in the ACCOUNTGL table there is a field COMP_CODE.
The only problem is that the field is not there
Does anybody know whet to do?
Thanks,
Magdalena

BAPI BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT is not used for a specific application, but needs to be called always after any BAPI is called to post the data that were changed in the BAPI to the database.
You need to find the BAPI that is used to post the invoice and then call BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT.
Always do:
call function 'BAPI_application_specific'
if sy-subrc eq 0.
call function 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
endif.
Check the documentation you have to see if you can find the application specific BAPI.
Hope that helps,
Michael

IDOC INPUT INVOIC FI Issue (Cross Company Sales)

Hello All,
As you know this IDOC posts the FI document for the cross company sales in the receiving company code.
I have found some business issues that I need advice for:-
1. If part of the sale has "free good" then SAP is grabbing the "cost price VPRS" from the billing document.
2. No material numbr from the SD billing document is added into the FI item. When I display the FI document the material is in the screen control. I guess I may need to use a userexit that allows me to add it manually in the field or as a text item.
3. CO-PA posting doesn't exist for the FI document as SAP advises that the GL account in OBCB is not a cost element. If I added the GL as a cost element then I would need to use a substitution or userexit ... to then change profit centre, etc. Note, if costs are not going into CO-PA then this will show incorrect sales profit figures, as cross company invoice is flowing into CO-PA.
4. Italy "free goods" have VAT charged, so I'm thinking that the IDOC cannot be used for Italy as mentioned in (1) above.
Looking for some handy advice. Note I have seen IDOC questions here and in SD, so not too sure this is the best place.
Regards and Thanks
Waza

hi
In Segment E1EDK01 there is a field EIGENUINR which holds the VaT number.
Regards
Prajwala K.

To validate no cross-company purchase order in F-47

Dear Gurus,
I would like to ask if there is any user exit / BADI that can be used to validate no cross-company Purchase Order(s) being entered in transaction F-47 : Down payment request.
Kindly advise.
Thanks & regards,
LOI

The reason for error message M8396 "Deviating local currencies &&"
is explained in note 317318:
"You enter a cross-company-code invoice. Here, all involved company
codes must have the same (first) local currency."
In the MM module it is not possible to post a cross company invoice
for company codes with different local currency. As you are aware the
error message is M8396 issued.
M8 396 was introduced in the system by note 317318 to prevent posting
cross company invoices with deviating local currencies and to prevent
inconsistencies in FI from docs posted from MM. This type of complex
posting is ONLY supported in the FI module. For more information on this
error message please also review note 321790.
You will not be able to post the invoice document with the company codes

Cross Company Sercice Order.

Hello,
We have 3 Company Codes and Each has 1 Plant.
Lets say -
Company Code - 001, 002, 003
Plant - 001, 002, 003
Profit center & Business area is also same
Each company code have only 1 Profit center and Business area
Now issue is
We have created work order in Co. Code 001
Service will be provided for all companies.
can we create service entry sheet with account assignment of COST CENTER of Company code 002.
What will be the configuration required.
Regards
Kant

The reason for error message M8396 "Deviating local currencies &&"
is explained in note 317318:
"You enter a cross-company-code invoice. Here, all involved company
codes must have the same (first) local currency."
In the MM module it is not possible to post a cross company invoice
for company codes with different local currency. As you are aware the
error message is M8396 issued.
M8 396 was introduced in the system by note 317318 to prevent posting
cross company invoices with deviating local currencies and to prevent
inconsistencies in FI from docs posted from MM. This type of complex
posting is ONLY supported in the FI module. For more information on this
error message please also review note 321790.
You will not be able to post the invoice document with the company codes

Cross company Purchase order

HI,
I am using MIRO to create a cross company transaction between company A and company B. Both companies have different first local currency : Company A is in CAD and company B is in USD. When I try to post the invoice I get the message M8396: Different local currecies CAD USD. I want to know is exist any restriction to do this transaction and if there is any SAP note that talk about this issue and explain what are the conditions to do cross company transaction?
Thank you for your help...

The reason for error message M8396 "Deviating local currencies &&"
is explained in note 317318:
"You enter a cross-company-code invoice. Here, all involved company
codes must have the same (first) local currency."
In the MM module it is not possible to post a cross company invoice
for company codes with different local currency. As you are aware the
error message is M8396 issued.
M8 396 was introduced in the system by note 317318 to prevent posting
cross company invoices with deviating local currencies and to prevent
inconsistencies in FI from docs posted from MM. This type of complex
posting is ONLY supported in the FI module. For more information on this
error message please also review note 321790.
You will not be able to post the invoice document with the company codes

Problem in GRN while Capturing Excise Invoice in Cross Company STO Scenario

Dear All,
In the Cross Company STO Scenario we are following the steps as below:-
1.) Creation of the purchase order to the supplying plant of type u201CNBu201D
2.) Creation of the Outbound delivery in VL10B
3.) Post Good Issue in the VL02N.
4.) Creation of the billing doc.
5.) Creation of the Excise Invoice.
6.) MIGO w.r.t to the Outbound delivery in the receiving plant
During MIGO ,initialy system is picking the excise rates and excise base value by its own from the purchase order and the moment when we refer the Excise Excise Invoice created in the supplying plant , system takes the Excise rates from the excise invoice created in the supplying plant and Excise Base value is becoming ZERO and we are getting the error :u201D *Please check excise base for the item is ZERO
Message no : 4F121
Please Suggest what to do and why this error is coming.
When I am giving any other Excise no is the Excise Invoice feild in MIGO , it is taking and refering the rates in PO and giving one information message that Excise invoice no is different from the supplying plant excise invoice no.
Thanks & Regards
Nitin

HI,
Check the excise base vlaue in the Supplying plant excise invoice. If its 0, maintain the assessible value in J1ID & Check.
If everything is found OK, check if any SAP notes are available.
Thanks & Regards,

GL account determination for vendor invoice in cross company sale sales

Hi
we are planning to implement cross company sales scenario.
High level design-
1) Sales Order is in co code X and the delivery is from group company lets say co code Y
2) The delivery from co code Y generates two invoices- one in Sales area of co code X for the final customer and 2nd in sales area of co code Y for the inter company
3) The intercompany invoice has EDI output type (Sap standard delivered object is RD04). The output generates a IDOC which has ability to post automatic vendor invoice in co code X crediting the inter company vendor Y.
4) The automatic vendor invoice GL account determination is via customisation OBCB and OBCE
I have some questions around this , particularly if in the vendor invoice we have to account for material and returnable packaging
In my current project there would FG packed in returnable packaging in co code Y
For Export there would be a dedicated co code(X).
Co code X gets orders from customers; and creates sales orders in its sales area with delivery plant of co code Y.
Along with FG returnable packaging is also charged as deposit by - co code X to customer and Co code Y to Co code X.
so in the vendor invoice how to generate the following entry
Inter company vendor              150 Cr
Cost of Goods sold         100 Dr
Returnable Packages deposit    50 Dr.
Similarly when the end customer returns the packaging generate the following entry via the cross company return order and intercompany invoice
intercompany vendor 50 Dr
Returnable packages 50 Cr
if you have worked on this kind of scenario and share how to customise to post for FG and Returnable packaging separately in the automatic vendor invoice it would be great.
Edited by: pravin_shah1403 on Nov 25, 2011 3:00 PM

Hi Pravin.
Did you figure this out?
I'm seeing that via OBCB we can hit only one G/L account.
We also need to hit multiple accounts.
We've figured out how to hit this via user-exit, however I'm hoping that I've missed something in configuration and that a resolution via configuration is possible?
Any ideas?

Document splitting error in cross company code invoice

Hi
I am trying to post an invoice through FB60 which is belong to multiple company code.
while simulating the document, system is not able to find the cost object (profit centre) for vendor line item. following is the detail of the transaction:-
Trasnaction Code - FB60
Vendor (co code 1000) - Cr     10000
Exp       (co code 1000) - Dr               5000
Exp       (co code 2000) - Dr               5000
Customization detail -
Item category for vendor reconciliation a/c -           03000
item cateogry for inter company clearing a/c -        01000
item cateogry for inter company customer a/c -      02000
Business Trasaction for document type (IC) used in FB60 - 0000. In document type IC i have allowed intercompany trnaction.
can anybody revert where i am missing the configuration. what additional i need to do to get out this error.
please revert
Regards
DD

Hello,
I also faced similar problem with posting cross company transacation whereby one of the document containing another Customer/Vendor line item which is not the intercompany clearing account. Both the additional Vendor/Customer and the Intercompany Vendor/Customer line items failed to derive the Profit Center information from the offsetting line items. The system recognize the Customer/Vendor line items (additional and Intercompany clearing) as "Leading Items" instead of derivating.
The journal looks like below.
CoCd A
dr. GL Account        [PC-A]   100
cr. ICT Vendor-B                   (100)   --> successfully deriving the [PC-A] information
CoCd B
dr. ICT Customer-A                  100      --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
cr. Customer                         (100)   --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
dr. GL Account       [PC-B]    100
cr. GL Account       [PC-B]    (100)
The GL Account in CoCd B are registered under Item Category "01000" and it has been registered as the splitting base item for the "ICT Customer-A" and "Cusomer" accounts.
Would really appreciate your kind help or suggestion to solve this issue.
Thanks a lot in adavance!
Regards,
Nurul F

Cross Company Code Invoice cancellation

Hello All,
I am facing an issue wherein the User wants to Reverse the Cross -company code Invoice. The user is unable to cancel the Invoice because of the Error "Dcoument allready contains cleared Items- reversal not possible. Can you suggest how can we proceed in this case.
Thanks
Nitin

Hi,
One of the vendor item of your CC document line items might have been cleared.
Means after posting of invoice, there must be an payment have been posted, since you cannot reverse invoice first.
If payment is already made, first reverse the payment document using FB08 and then reverse your CC document using FBU8 incase of FI entry, where as if it is an MIRO invoice, use MR8M to reverse the CC invoice document.
This will resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu

Cross Company code invoices.

Hi All,
I want to creat a Cross Company code PO based invoices in MIRO.
I have created 2 PO's with the same vendor and differenct company codes.
But in MIRO it is taking only one PO to invoice.
I am not aware of cross company code settings.
Can any one plz provides steps to create the Cross Company code PO Based invoice in MIRO.
Thanks,
Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please look at the appropriate functional forum.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Nov 2, 2010 5:56 PM

Hi,
Please contact to your MM consultant. Thanks

Cross Company Sales Automatic Vendor Invoice Not Created

Hi,
I have an issue in Cross company Sales Scenario (Inter company Sales),
During the Intercompany Invoice we can trigger output RD04 to create Automatic Vendor Invoice in the Ordering Company.
I have done the necessary configuration for creating Idoc (RD04), FI & MM.
I could able to create an Idoc successfully and the status of the Idoc is 53.
However when I check the Vendor Invoice in the Ordering Company T.Code FBL1N, system gives me message that no items found for the Vendor.
I request please let me know me what configuration I have to do to create Cross Company Sales Automatic Vendor Invoice
Regards,
Murali
Edited by: Murali Mikkili on Jul 27, 2008 9:05 AM
Edited by: Murali Mikkili on Jul 28, 2008 11:49 AM

Hi Daniel,
Both the company codes should be assigned to the same company.
Clearing accounts must be defined in every company code before a cross-company code transaction may be carried out. The clearing accounts may be G/L accounts, customer, or vendor accounts.
In the configuration you must assign clearing accounts to every possible combination of two company codes to allow cross-company code postings between these combinations
To reduce the number of clearing accounts, you can use just one company code as the clearing company code. In this case, you only have to assign clearing accounts to every combination of the clearing company code
In T-code OBYA
For ex: company code 1000 clearing account 12345 is same for Debit and credit
Company code 2000 Clearing account 67890 is same for debit and credit
Posting keys must be assigned to the clearing accounts to identify their account
types.
Hope this helps you to solve your probelm.
Regards,
Mir

Cross company invoice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for