Cross company stock trasfer for quality Stock

Hello All,
Can we do a stock transfer for QA Stock in cross company code...If the answer is what are the config and changes need to be done?
Thanks

Hi
Standard SAP does not allow to transfer the stock from quality, you can transfer it from Unsrestricted only.
When you receive you can receive into Quality inspection stock.
Hope it helps.
THanks/karthik

Similar Messages

  • Weird Problem in QM stock posting from Quality Stock to Unrestricted

    Hi all,
    Today I hit a weird problem in SAP and struck there for the past 5 hours. The problem is,
    I have a batch managed material, for which QM view is available. 01 inspection type is activated along with the "Post to Inspection Stock indicator" for that material in material master.
    Now I am creating a Purchase order and doing a goods receipt in MIGO. Then it creates a inspection lot of type 01
    for this material and puts the stock in to Quality stock (I checked in MMBE).
    Now as per standard SAP behaviour, if I want to move the stock from Quality to Unrestricted, I can only do it in QA11 trasaction through Inspection stock tab. If I try to do 321 (Quality to Unrestricted) movement in MIGO, the system will send an error message "Change the inspection stock of material XXXXXXX in QM only"
    But in my case, I am not getting this error message, the system is still allowing me to move the stock from Quality to Unrestricted thorugh MIGO using 321 movement. This is not standard and I don't want this.
    This behavior is seen in 04 and 08 inspection lots also (with post to insp stock indicator).
    The aftermath of this problem, if I do a MIGO transfer posting of say 100 PC through 321. The system is correspondingly updating the MMBE transaction by moving this 100 PC from Quality stock to Unrestricted. But if I go to QA11 and check, the QM still shows that 100 PC to be in Quality stock itself, thus creating a mis-match between actual stock situation and the stock situation in QM.
    I already checked and most of the SPRO nodes and I am left clueless. One more thing, Usage Decision is not yet done for the inspection lot and it is just REL status. Also thee are no developments or enhancements in QM module in my project. Only 1 enhancement relating to custom sample label and rest of all the functionality is standard.
    Sorry for the long post. How to correct this? Please help me!
    Thanks in advance,
    Vinodh

    I don't know why this happenned.  Look at the QM view of the material master and see if the "inspection setup" flag on the QM view is clicked on.  That is usually greyed out and is set by having an inspection type activated.  You can't manually set that once an inspection type is added.  But that is the indicator I believe is used to determine if regular stock movements are allowed for QM stocks.
    I would try to first clear all your inspection lots first.
    Then delete all the inspection types from the material.  And I mean actually go in and delete them. 
    Then use QA08 to reactivate the ones you need.
    Then see if this solves the problem.
    FF

  • Invoice block for quality stock

    Hi
    How to block the material for invoice payment i(MIRO) which is laying as the quality stock after did the GR against the purchase order.
    for our case, while check the OQB1- the block not happen for the particular material
    but for other materils it working fine

    Hi
    i checked the condrol key . it have the tick mark in blocked invoice and released required.
    and more same thing is maintained in another material which is got the invoice block while do the miro.
    so it may not be related to material master, q-info record.
    so pls tell me anyother posibility which is particular to material and vendor basics .

  • 101 to be used only for unrestricted stock and not for quality stock

    Dear Experts,
    My client requires that mvt type 101 to be used for GR into ONLY unrestricted stock and not into Quality stock, if it requires we can create new mvt type as well.
    Please let me know how to achieve this.
    Regards
    Abhi

    You can set default value in MIGO for movement type and stock type..
    Go to MIGO
    The set default value for stock type as Unrestricted and movement type 101.
    Then Go to OLMB-Settings for Enjoy Transactions-Settings for Goods Movements (MIGO)-Field Selection for MIGO
    Here set the field Stock type as display..
    Then check in MIGO
    The field value will be unrestricted always and user will not able to change this..
    Test the scenario and revert back..

  • Invoce verification blocking for quality stock

    Dear SAP  Experts,
    We dont have  quality module in our project,  I have one requirment , When goods are posted  to quality stock during MIGO, The iinvoice  verification has to be stoped till the stock is  posted to Un Restricted Use,  Please suggest me  how to stop the invoice verification,
    With regards,

    hi
    You can send material to quality via delivery schedule tab in purchase order item level, Then while migo goods is in quality inspection , after that use 321 movement to remove goods from quality inspection , so that you can make miro after that .
    Hope it will useful.
    Regards
    ragini

  • After UD stock is in Quality stock

    Hi All,
       I am getting a problem with the Inspection lot, After doing UD for the inspection lot , System status is showing   UD   ICCO SPCO STUP HUM means stock posting is completed but actually the stock is not moving from quality stock to Unrestricted stock. Can anyone help in this problem?
    Neel

    Hello Neel,
    Did it happened  in one of the 4.6 version of SAP ? I guess I have seen something similar in 4.6C earlier ? If it  is has happened as one of the case then perform the posting in QA12 but if it  is been observed quite often then I will suggest to raise an OSS note as the lots status is already 'Stock posting completed'.
    Cheers
    Kaushik

  • Prevent cross-company code postings for certain document type

    Hi all!
    I am looking for a possibility to prevent users from posting a "cross-company code posting" just for a certain document type.
    I checked validation rules and BTEs but without success. Do you have an idea?
    Thanks for any support.
    Michael

    Thanks for your reply. I have already tried to use a validation rule, but without success.
    It did not work as the relevant field "New company code" (NEWBK) in not part of BKPF or BSEG, but (only) of structure RF05A. Thus, I cannot use the field in a validation rule.
    Or is there a way to make RF05A fields available for use in validation rules?
    Regards, Michael

  • Cross - company cash application for Accounts recievables

    Kindly let me know how to conduct an cross company cash application. Which transaction will best accomplish this .
    I have set - up the cross - company clearing account between the 2 companies.
    Thanks in advance.

    If I am not wrong, your company code A receives payment from customer and you want to clear the customer open item in company code B.  If you have done the cross-company code clearing between these two company codes using T Code OBYA, then all you have to do is make the following posting in company code A.
    Dr. Cash/Bank $100 (in company code A)
    Cr. Customer $100 (in company code B)
    System will automatically generate the following postings.
    Dr. Cash/Bank $100 (in CoCd A)
    Cr. Clearing with CoCd B $100 (in CoCd A)
    Dr. Clearing with CoCd A $ 100 (in CoCd B)
    Cr. Customer $100 (in CoCd B)
    Clearing accounts are what you specify in OBYA.
    Assign pts. if this answers your question!

  • Stock Report for Individual Stock Segments

    Is there a report similar to MCBZ, but very specifically showing individual stock segments like sales order stock?

    Hi try this
    MMBE
    MB5B
    MB52
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Cancel M/t Doc with Quality Stock

    Dear All,
            I am facing the problem in cancellation of material document with Quality Stock.
    I am explaining my scenario, when GR is posted the stock directly comes to Quality stock because, QM is activated.After that QM users release the quality plan in QA32.Then, u know it comes to Un-restriced stock.After that inventory person trying to cancel this material document in MIGO(cancellation) transaction, but the system not allowing to post.So, what we are doing, cancel in MB01 transaction with respect to PO itself in that case, we are manually removing the "X'indicator for quality stock when we posting.
    But, in purchase order history, its showing the 102 Mvt.type.But, its not showing in J1iex(Posted-101) document flow (cancel-102) not showing for item wise Excise data.Part-1 entries not all cancelling with respect to excise.
    I also check the scenario of GR - Quality Stock & Cancel(MIGO) - Quality stock. the J1iex document flow correctly updating..
    But, the GR - Quality Stock, Cancel(MB01) - Un-restricted Stock, J1iex document flow not all updating..
    Please resolve my issue experts!!!
    From sas..

    Hello,
    It is std SAp functionality in CIN.
    The part1 entries will get cancelled only if the material document is cancelled through transaction MIGO - Cancellation.
    It won't get updated if you are using MBST or MB01/MIGO with 102 movement type.
    Once QC has released the stock, it is not possible to cancel the material document through MIGO-Cancellation.
    But for that, what you can do is that cancel the Usage decision  (UD) done through QA32. Check the below SAP Notes for UD reversal logic.
    33924  - Reversing usage decisions
    175842 - Inspection lot: Reversal of goods movements from UD
    Regards
    Gregory Mathews

  • Regarding the report for vendor stock

    Hello all,
    This is regarding the Subcontracting scenario. We have requirement of transferring the stock of material to Vendor by using 311 Q as the tye child material is in the project stock. In
    However the customer would like to have a report in which we can see the stock provided to vendor  ' Vendorwise or PO wise" .
    Kindly suggest the solution.
    Thanks & regards,
    Sudhir

    Hi
    The stock monitoring for SC stocks at vendor can be done uswing ME2O report.
    If you want to see the total stocks available at vendor then use report MBLB

  • Cross Company code posting is available for recurring payment setup?

    Hi All,
    I could not find the cross company code field for recurring payment setup with useing T code FBD1.
    Vendor is created in paying company code 1000, however, the rent has be booked to cross company code (1001) cost center (2000).
    So, while trying to do recurring payment setup, I could not see the field.
    I know the alternative option that i can use the "Cost Center(1000)" is assigned to CoCd 1000 and do recurring setup without useing cross company code, later i can post the manual journal for correction (as below), however, I do not want use this option.
    Dr/Cr       CoCd                         GL account            Cost Center           Amount
    Dr            1001                         Rent account          2000                      XXXXX
    Cr            1000                         Rent account          1000                      XXXXX
    Please let me know your thoughts on this.
    Thanks,
    Srinivas

    Hi, ok17 is not for cross company,but for CO-FI real time integration.
    Ex. you maintained for "RKL     Actual activity allocation" Dr 123 Cr 567
    Then while posting activity allocation in CO you'll get posting like Dr 123 Cr 567   (with corresponding CO objects)

  • Tax Apportionment for Cross-Company Code

    how can 'business area'  be inherited from the source FI documents
    which are generated by cross-company transaction?.for example:
    company code D/C account business area amount
    1000 D expense 1000 1000
    1000 D tax 234
    1000 C vendor 1000 2234
    1000 D clearingA 1000 1000
    2000 D expense 2000 1000
    2000 C clearingB 2000 1000
    after running 'rfbust10',i want the document will be like that:
    company code D/C account business area amount
    1000 c tax 1000 117
    1000 D clearing 1000 1000
    1000 C clearing 1000 883
    2000 D tax 2000 117
    2000 c clearing 2000 117

    Hi,
    In IMG under
    Financial Accounting -> Preparations for Consolidation -> Business Area Consolidation -> Materials Management -> Assign Division/Valuation Area to Business Area
    Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Sales and Distribution -> Assign Business Area to Plant and Division
    Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Sales and Distribution -> Assign Business Area by Sales Area
    Sales and Distribution -> Basic Functions -> Account Assignment/Costing -> Business Area Account Assignment -> Assign Business Area to Plant and Division
    Sales and Distribution -> Basic Functions -> Account Assignment/Costing -> Business Area Account Assignment -> Assign Business Area by Sales Area
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • How to activate Compny code validation ( cross company code)

    *Hi ,*
    *We migrated classic GL to New GL before one month Now*
    *I am rollout new company code, after completed all configuration I found uncopmplit  configuration of company code validation is not active in  controlling area config ( Transaction Code- OKKP) , which is related to cross company code ( Indicator for company code validation )*
    *can anybody provide solution to activate company code validation*
    Thank ,
    Jeetendra

    Hi ,
    I want to activate company code validation for cross company code still it is inactive
    without  activation I can not use cross company code for costing
    Edited by: jitu konde on Jun 15, 2011 9:38 AM

  • Is Personnel Number cross company code?

    Hi,
    Have a very fundermental question. Is Personnel number cross company codes? For example, if there are 2 company codes (A and B) in one SAP box and there is an employee in company code A who has the personnel number 900001. Can another employee in company code B has the same peronnel number 900001?
    Thanks,
    Ting

    Hi,
    It is not. You may not have two persons with same Personnel number, no matter if they are in differents Company Codes. There is just one Personnel number and it must be assigned to only one employee.
    Regards,
    Edoardo

Maybe you are looking for