Customer correspondance

hi,
i want to generate customer correspondance
while generating i am getting a message
'Report allocatn for correspond.type SAP06 has not been fully maintained''
can any one help me to solve this problem
thanks

Hi ,
check the t code f.61 print correspondence maintenance after that try to generate print.
Thanks,
Srini.

Similar Messages

A/R Invoice amount splited into 2 different posting periods

Dear forum members,
Is there a way to split an A/R invoice into 2 different posting periods?
The Scenario example is as follows:
My customer issues invoices on a 15 days base, i.e., every 15 days they issue an invoice to the customer, corresponding to the past 15 days;
Now, let us suppose on 10th February they issued an invoice corresponding to the past 15 days (26/01/2012 to 9/02/2012).
As we see this invoice covers both January and February posting periods.
I would like to find a way to have the total amount of the invoice splited into corresponding month.
In other words, I want the value corresponding to 26/01 to 31/01 to fall into January and the value corresponding to 01/02 to 09/02 posted to February.
Any contribution on finding a way to handle this, will be very much appreciated.
Thanking you in advance!
Kind Regards,
Victor

Dear Victor,
One Invoice can only have one posing date in B1. So the only solution is to split it to two invoices. You can not beat the system.
Thanks,
Gordon

What is the purpose of Defining a requirement in the procedure?

Hi
I have a query related to the Output type .
What is the purpose of Defining a requirement in the procedure?
And where shall we code for a new requirement and also what shall we code in it?
Thanks

Requirement Use
If the requirement is fulfilled (SY-SUBRC = 0), then output determination also takes into consideration output type or the access sequence, for which the requirement has been specified.
Output determination:
An object that checks whether the application data (for example, data determined in Customizing) corresponds to the condition records.
If this is the case, one or several messages are "found," which can then be processed (for example, sent electronically).
The condition records are searched for according to a predefined hierarchy in message determination.
After defining a new requirement no say 604 for billing pricing procedure and activating it, the standard sap system creates a routine with the no: 604 specifically for billing. So the name of the program automatically created by SAP will have the naming convention something like RV64A604. then you need an access key to go to the change mode for writing any logic. Then just put a break-point and then execute VF01 or VF04, then the cursor position directly goes into this routine, where the pricing structures KOMK and KOMP have the visibility. So based on the values flowing inside this structures, you can probably code that suites the business requirements.
there are some useful transactions like VOFM for maintaining the requirements and formulaes for a pricing procedure.
For viewing the requirements in the procedure you can also go to V/08 transaction.
Lakshminarayanan
P.S. Reward points for all helpful answers.

Billed for Premium Tech Support That Did Not Fix the Problem

i too was scammed last night by a premiun tech support rep...he assured me that the problem i was having with my pc
could be repaired and pursuaded   me to purchase the 10 month plan for $14.00 month also said if i canceled prior to the 10 mos i would be charged a $59.99 fee.......I told him I would sign up if he could assure me the pc problem would be resolved.
He also assusred me that if it could not be resolved to ask to be transfered to the billing department to cancel the the plan   I confirmed this with him at least 3 times and he assured me I would not have to pay and I could cancel with no monetary obligation if the problem on my pc could not be resolved....well it was not and my computer was left in worse condition than when the premium support tech began working on it...the support tech worked on my computer for 3 and 1/2 hoursI was on the phone with him until 3:30 am....he apologized and said he did not expect the outcome of what happened to my computer. well needless to say when i called billing i was told I was liable for the $59.00 early cancelation fee it did not matter that the tech did not repair the problem or that he left my computer in worse condition than when he  began working on it.........so technically what they are saying is that I have to pay for them creating problems on my pc that did not exist before I called them   I The sales rep I spoke to was "scott : he said he was in massachusetts..I spoke with Eric in BIlling and he said he would note on my account what I had told him and asked me to call after the charge appears on my phone bill to see if i could have it removed...i also called billing again today and spoke with another billing rep and she said she also would note my problem on my account and that hopefully the $59.00 fee would be removed..it is very disppointing to know that Verizon Hires people that lie to consumers.....all of their employee conversations to customers need to be recorded and monitored. I received a recorded message from verizon this am asking if i was satisfied with the service i received from tech suppoort with #1 being the least satisfed which of course described my experience with them. If My tele phone bill does not reflect the cancellation of the $59.00charge I will definitly pursue this matter further....

I was also billed on July 15, 2014 for tech support that did not fix my computer problem.
I was billed $99.99 to my credit card to a tech in the country of India.
I tried to get my money back but the number I was referred to would not answer.
I immediately went to my bank which took all of the info and changed my credit card number.
The bank also did their own investigation and said it seemed to be a scam. My money was redeposited into my account within 36 hours - not because of anything Verizon did, but my BANK!!   I was so grateful.
Such service from Verizon's tech department is unethical and inexcusable.
Verizon customers deserve better tech service than this. "Ma Bell" would turn over in her grave if she knew how far down the service of the original phone company has gone. It's a disgrace!! A SCAM perpetuated and sanctioned by Verizon.
I complained to the Verizon Customer Correspondance Claim Dept. Do you think they will straighten this mess out? I doubt it - I am a retiree with an excellent payment record.
They don't care. This hurts the American economy.

STO Stock Transfer Order with HU (Handling Units) - Error Hugeneral 319

Hello,
We implemented a Stock Transfer Order process with the following details:
MM side
- PO is type NB, supplier is F_8001;
- In table T001W, supplier F_8001 is assigned to plant 80GP;
- WERKS = 40TV and LGORT = 41P in all PO items;
- In each item, the shipping tab is filled with NLCC as delivery type and customer C_4000 (this customer corresponds to plant 40TV in table T001W). The sales area is also defined as the sales area to be used in the sales order that will be created in plant 80GP;
SD side
- Sales order is created automatically for customer C_4000;
- In plant 80GP we have a HU managed stloc (32P). In this stloc we have a HU with the exact contents of the sales order. This HU has X in the HU storage loc field;
- We created the outbound delivery and chose our HU. From this moment the HU storage loc field changed to D and the HU was assigned to the delivery;
Now for the problem:
When we click Post Goods Issue button, we get the following error for each item:
HUGENERAL 319 - HU item contains different data than the stock posting
The HU contents are exactly what we need to ship, so we do not understand this error. We need this HU to be transfered to stloc 41P in plant 40TV (this stloc is also HU managed). Any clues?
Thanks in advance,
Joã

Hi,
Have you checked your HU material and material to packed both having stock in Inventory.
Even check the table HUMSEG is correctly updated or not.
check this table correctly Hu assignd to you material and created materil document or not.
check for for material master clearly for both material like plant, storage location, batch etc..
Ask your MM consultant to check all entry is correct in material master and delivery or not.
Regards
Karthik.

IDoc Creation Issue

Hi All,
I am facing an awkward problem. I created a Partner Profile for a Customer and assigned the Message Type 'DESADV' to it.
Then I created a Delivery For the Customer corresponding to a created Sales Order .
I put a break-point on the Corrseponding Function Module IDOC_OUTPUT_DESADV01 which got associated with the Partner Profile. I was hoping that it would stop at the break-point. But it didnt and an IDoc got created.
I tried to put the break-points at various locations in the Function Module but it was of no use. Every time IDoc got created without stopping at the break-point.
As per my understanding, the data in the IDoc gets filled only using the associated Function Module. But, I am not able to understand the reason why we are not able to put a break-point in this Function Module and see the processing.
Please advise on the issue. Is there any alternate way also by which an IDoc gets filled.
Thanks a lot in advance.

In tcode we57..
fm
IDOC_OUTPUT_DESADV1 has been assigned to DESADV.
i m not sure but check that..
santhosh

Charged for 2 FREE service calls/costing $70 each and they DID NOT fix the problem.

My service was interupted DAILY between 2:45pm - 6pm and sometimes 7pm. I contacted someone in the chat room and explained, they said they would send someone out and there would be NO CHARGE...I made sure and they said, Rest assured that there will be no charge" They did send someone out, around 11am, and said, hey, it's a gold signal splitter, I'll replace it with this new one. Well, they did. A few minute job. Well, 2:45pm rolled around and guess what? SIGNAL LOSS on tv and cable...till about 6pm. Well, next day i contacted them, and same scenario. They sent someone out-around 12pm, and said, oh the coaxial connecters are a "little loose". Well, he tightened them...a few minute "fix". Well, 2:45pm rolls around and AGAIN SIGNAL LOSS, no internet and NO TV till 6:30pm. Well, I've had enough so I cancelled service..Now I check my bill and 2 service calls for $70 each plus $15 tax totalling $155. I talked to someone in the chat room and told them this scenario. Well, they said they can waive 1 of the service call, but since my equipment is owned by me and not rented, I have to pay and that in their notes, it never said that I would get a free service call. The problem is that it NEVER was fixed and the problem had nothing to do with the signal splitter or connections, but something in the neighborhood, in which I saw 2 Xfinity service trucks on my street when I came home. So I am out $85 for something they did not fix-apparently something going on connectionwise in the neighborhood. ALSO WATCH OUT FOR CHAT ROOM REPS THAT SAY IT WILL BE A FREE SERVICE CALL. THEY LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anybody know how I can contact the CEO of Xfinity?

I was also billed on July 15, 2014 for tech support that did not fix my computer problem.
I was billed $99.99 to my credit card to a tech in the country of India.
I tried to get my money back but the number I was referred to would not answer.
I immediately went to my bank which took all of the info and changed my credit card number.
The bank also did their own investigation and said it seemed to be a scam. My money was redeposited into my account within 36 hours - not because of anything Verizon did, but my BANK!! I was so grateful.
Such service from Verizon's tech department is unethical and inexcusable.
Verizon customers deserve better tech service than this. "Ma Bell" would turn over in her grave if she knew how far down the service of the original phone company has gone. It's a disgrace!! A SCAM perpetuated and sanctioned by Verizon.
I complained to the Verizon Customer Correspondance Claim Dept. Do you think they will straighten this mess out? I doubt it - I am a retiree with an excellent payment record.
They don't care. This hurts the American economy.

Problems with returning the license

I bought a a VLM agreement with licenses, and 2 of the computers crashed how can I return these 2 licenses back to the available pool being as the computers are un-available?

For the initial version of ALM Adobe has established a process to recover lost e-licenses via customer service. In the event of lost licenses (hard drive crashes, lost or stolen laptop, etc.), customers can call customer service and e-licenses will be added to the pool indicated by the customer (corresponding to the number lost).
Future versions of ALM will enable for self-service and auto-detection/recovery of lost e-licenses.

Linking Zcustomer Credit memo to Correspondence

Dear Friends,
We have created Zcustomer Credit memo.
I have configured
1. Define Correspondence Types - ZSAP7
2.Create Report Variants for Correspondence -ZSAP11
3.Assign Programs for Correspondence Types - ZRFKORD50
4.Define Forms for Correspondence - ZSC_F140_DOCU
5.Define Form Names for Correspondence Print
But, When go to T.code FB12 and enter Co.code 1000 and press enter,i am unable to see ZSAP7 which i have configured.
Because of this, I am unable to print Zcustomer Credit memo.
Please advise how to solve this problem.
Regards
Sridhar

Hi,
Please activate the various check boxes for your custom corresponding type in customization OB79
Regards,
Gaurav

T77RCF_SMASK table entries: Error - Customizing table T77RCF_SMASK contains no corresponding entry for SMASK_ID = 0071

Team,
Table T77RCF_SMASK has reference to T77RCF_SMG_ASM.
When compared the two tables we found that following entries are missing in T77RCF_SMASK:
71
72
73
74
75
78
92
95
96
Can you please guide on what should be the entry for these in table T77RCF_SMASK? Would appreciate if full table entries are shown in answer for future users.
Missing entries are causing error "Customizing table T77RCF_SMASK contains no corresponding entry for SMASK_ID = 0071 and so on in SLG1 logs display.
Regards
Yash

The table enteries should be as attached
Regards
Khalid

How to assign custom tab field value to corresponding standard tab field value.

Dear friends,
I want assign a field value ( advice code , advice code description ) in a custom tab to corresponding field value in standard tab (advcode ,). in me51n.
following screen shot are given below

Hi SK,
It looks both the tabs are custom ones. In that case, you can either use Export/Import statement or you can use Set/Get Parameter ID for setting value.
If one is standard subscreen, you can export value from custom subscreen and use line item level user-ext/enhancement to assign the value on standard subscreen.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Naveen

How to Create Correspondance for Customer Statement

Hi Gurus,
my client is asking for customer statement.How to create correspondance for that.i dont want to use standard one.initially i tried with standard one,but it is giving the heading as open items instead of customer statement.
what should i do.Kindly help me
Thanks
Prathima

Prathima,
While we all agree that SAP's in-app help could do with a lot of improvement, however there's no shortage in terms of volume and coverage. Have you cared to perhaps look at [SAP Online Help|http://help.sap.com]?
Here's a little something to get you started. Have a look [here|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/01/a9cf0d455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm] and [here|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/01/a9cf0d455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm].
Under IMG, the path is Financial Accounting --> Financial Accounting Global Settings --> Correspondence.
This should be enough to get you started to forage on your own.
Happy Learning!
Regards
Gulshan

Task custom field and formula custom field don't correspond Project Server 2013

Hi people, I have an interesting case in Project Server 2013 SP1 CU Apr:
I have a custom task number field called AM. This field get's filled by a PSI action with actual material costs from an external system.
I also have a custom task cost formula field that is called AM*. This field is a formula field that has the formula [AM]. And summary tasks use the formula field as well.
As soon as I create a project, assign costs in the external system and let PSI fill the values within AM I get correct values in AM. But nothing is calculated on AM*. If I edit the project in the browser and publish, check in and revisit the project
AM* still isn't filled.
If I open the project in MS Project Pro the calculation comes through nicely, however I do not want to use MS project Pro to see correct data in browser.
Some tests I have already done:
I have noticed that when I create a new calculated task field AM2*, this get's calculated correctly on the already existing task.
I have also noticed that opening the custom field in server settings and just saving the field creates correct values on AM*.
What is going on? I don't want to save the custom formula field every day... There are 11 custom formula fields in the environment at the moment.

Hi Gary,
Thank you for the quick response. Please note that the fieldnames are [AM] and [AM*]. There is a difference in field name due to the astrix. However I did think about the situation and changing one of the field names all together didn't do anything for the
situation at hand.
It looks like some kind of refresh thing, because without changing anything in the custom field just saving the field in server settings will turn op good values. However, values already turned up good in Project Professional 2013. And that suggest
that there is a calculation error on the PWA side wouldn't you say?
Anyway, thank you for taking time to look into this matter.
Erik

Correspondance for customer statements F.27

Dear all
I am trying to select a standard form to print customer statements but it is not working. I think it is something not correct in customising. Can anyone send me the steps to do this please.
Also when using F.27 I cannot print all the selected customers together but promts me to select a printer for each customer statement with the wrong form being desplayed in the spool.
Thanks
PRG

Try to execute RFKORD11 for customer statement to see how it turns out.
Go through the steps in this menu path: IMG u2013 Fin.Acctu2019g u2013 Fin. Acctu2019g Global Settings u2013 Correspondence
Correspondence SAP06 is used in standard program but you may need to define your own form.

Where can I find corresponding table name for SPRO Customizing

Hi,
Now my project is to integrate CRM to legacy system.
I need to do value translation in middle ware, in my case, it is value mapping in PI.
I go to SPRO->Cross-Application Components->SAP Business Partner->Business Partner
there are many customized value, e.g. Martial Status:
1-Single;
2-Married;
3-Widowed;
4-Divorced;
5-Separated
How could I find which table are those values stored?
Thanks
Liang
Edited by: Liang Ji on May 4, 2011 4:44 PM

Hi,
Could you try press F1 on field code к name?
Denis.

Customer correspondance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for