A/R Invoice amount splited into 2 different posting periods

Dear forum members,
Is there a way to split an A/R invoice into 2 different posting periods?
The Scenario example is as follows:
My customer issues invoices on a 15 days base, i.e., every 15 days they issue an invoice to the customer, corresponding to the past 15 days;
Now, let us suppose on 10th February they issued an invoice corresponding to the past 15 days (26/01/2012 to 9/02/2012).
As we see this invoice covers both January and February posting periods.
I would like to find a way to have the total amount of the invoice splited into corresponding month.
In other words, I want the value corresponding to 26/01 to 31/01 to fall into January and the value corresponding to 01/02 to 09/02 posted to February.
Any contribution on finding a way to handle this, will be very much appreciated.
Thanking you in advance!
Kind Regards,
Victor

Dear Victor,
One Invoice can only have one posing date in B1. So the only solution is to split it to two invoices. You can not beat the system.
Thanks,
Gordon

Similar Messages

How to roll up Amount field upto Input Criteria Posting period

Hi All,
I have a requirement to create a FI Budget report where the User will give the Posting Period as the input criteria, and based on the entered Posting period, 2 amount fields, "Original Budget" & "Current Month" need to get derived by looking at another amount field called actual, by rolling up the Amounts up to the entered Posting period.
For example, the user gives input as Posting period = 06, which is December because Fiscal year starts from July here. And my Cube has an amount field "Actual" which displays amount for each posting period. Therefore when posting period = 06, then the "Actual" amount value for months July (PP = 01) through December (PP = 06) should be rolled up i.e added and displayed in the "Original Budget field". The Current month should only display the amount for the input criteria month.
How can I do that, any suggestions please?
Thanks!!

Hi Sam,
Is there any way i could do it without the SAP Exit? If yes, how? If no, can u specify in the document you sent, which code i could use as reference for my requirement?
Thanks

Parallel Ledgers - different posting variants - document posting

Hi Experts,
In our scenario, we have one Leading & one Non-leading ledger and both the ledgers have same Fiscal year varaint but different posting period varaint.
1. If we close the Posting period variant for the non-leading ledger and keep the PPV open for that of the leading ledger, and if we post an entry to all ledgers (i.e. without specifying any ledger group) will the entry get posted to the Non-leading ledger as well, even if the PPV for the same is closed?
I found that the system still posts the entry to the Non-leading ledger even if the PPV for the NL ledger is closed. The PPV specifically assigned to the Non-leading leadger only holds good when the entry is specifically post to that ledger or to the ledger group in which it is a representative ledger.
Can some one please suggest and give your valuable inputs.
Thanks,
M

Can you please indicate what your requirement is ?? You should be aware through Posting Keys, you can define whether it relates to a Customer, Vendor, G/L Account or Material and not for document type.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

F110 one invoice amount into diiferent cheques due to payment method limits

hi experts,
i had a problem while running app by using f110,we are using the cheque payment method, maximum amount limit authorisation for cheque Payment Method is 5,00,000/-, but at the time of app if invoice amount exceeds payment method it is showing exception list.
kindly suggest me how to generate for one invoice mutiple chques
eg: invoice amount:7,00,000/-
Limit for single cheque: 5,00,000/-
how i can get two cheques i.e. 5 lakhs & 2 Lakhs while running app f110
please give me soluation
rgds

hi,
thanks for your reply, actually the problem is while running appf110 invoice payment amount exceedes cheque payment method & it's showing as exception list
in my case my invoice amount is 7,00,000/-
we are using cheque payment method & Per cheque limit is 5,00,000/- if exceeds cheque limit amount more than 5,00,000/- banker will return the cheque, we have to issue the more cheques for single invoice. in my caseinvoice value isr 7,00,000/- so i have to issue the cheque like 5,00,000/- & 2,00,000/- through Appf110
kindly suggest me how can i achive this process
rgds
gopal

G/L accounts amount spliting in payroll posting

Hi to all,
We are getting a different problem in payroll posting side.
G/l accounts balance are spliting into debit and credit, why is it happening like this?
Inputs: i have seen payroll RT table, there is no wage type or amounts split in payroll. it is happening to only basic elements.
like i am getting 10,000 - basic, conveyance -2000, variable -3000
the above amount are going to debit(DR) column, again above the half amount to going to credit(Cr) column like 5000,1000,1500.
but in dev, quality client it is not happening, in production client only it is happening. We have cross checked the all screens, but we are not able to find the exact error.
What might be the problem. Awaiting for your valuable replies.
Regards
Devi

Hi,
Exactly, you are correct.
But we changed cost center in the month starting date. like we are in May month, but we changed the cost center in the month April 01.
and also we are getting following error.
Field WBS Elem. is a required field for G/L account.
Description of error:
Field WBS Elem. is a required field for G/L account 1100 401001
Message no. F5808
Diagnosis
The value for field "WBS Elem." in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "xxxxxx" in company code "xxxx" linked to the field selection for posting key "50".
System Response
Error
Procedure
It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "WBS Elem.". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
Pls suggest me.
Regards
Devi

Calculation Of invoice amount

I got Invoice_Amount two ways By Joining Some tables
First way
Tables:
wsh_delivery_details
wsh_delivery_assignments
wsh_new_deliveries
The Query :
select max(wnd.STATUS_CODE) Status, wnd. DELIVERY_ID INV_NO,
Max(wdd.DATE_SCHEDULED) Inv_Date, Max(wdd.CUSTOMER_ID) CUSTOMER_ID, sum(nvl(wdd.SHIPPED_QUANTITY,0) * nvl(wdd.UNIT_PRICE,0)) Inv_Amt
from wsh_delivery_details wdd, wsh_new_deliveries wnd ,wsh_delivery_assignments wda
where wdd.DELIVERY_DETAIL_ID= wda.DELIVERY_DETAIL_ID
and wda.DELIVERY_ID=wnd.DELIVERY_ID
group by wnd. DELIVERY_ID
Second way
Tables:
ra_customer_trx_lines_all
ra_customer_trx_all ct
Query:
select max(cl.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID) Cust_trx_no ,max(ct.TRX_NUMBER) ct_trx
,cl.INTERFACE_LINE_ATTRIBUTE3 INV_No,max(cl.CREATION_DATE) Inv_date,
sum(cl.QUANTITY_INVOICED* cl.UNIT_SELLING_PRICE) inv_amt ,
Max(cl.SALES_ORDER) Ord_No ,Max(cl.SALES_ORDER_DATE) Order_date ,max(ct.TRX_DATE)
ct_TRX_DATE,Max(ct.SOLD_TO_CUSTOMER_ID) ct_SLDtoCust
from ra_customer_trx_lines_all cl,ra_customer_trx_all ct
where cl.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID=ct.CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
group by cl.INTERFACE_LINE_ATTRIBUTE3
Note:cl.INTERFACE_LINE_ATTRIBUTE3 is INV number.
But invoice Amounts are different. Why it is so? Shall i apply any more
conditions? Why same Data(ie selling price and Quantity) storing in two tables(ra_customer_trx_lines_all,wsh_delivery_details)?

Hi Mike,
U r using transaction types to generate your distributions, right?
Try to insert distribution info for each of your invoices in the table ra_interface_distributions_all, specifying REC, REV and TAX (tax where applicable) lines.
Hope this will solve your prob.
Vik

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error when doing incoming payment
regards
kavitha S

Hi Kavitha,
please check in the OINV table the balance due on the invoice. This amount has to match the payment. If the problem is due to different decimal places & you are using a version lower than 2007 you will be able to change the decimal places for this particular payment. If you are using 2007, you will no longer be able to reduce the number of decimal places. In that case you could check out SAP note 1321183 & verify with your accountant that the workaround may be used.
All the best,
Kerstin

How to know the splitted invoiced amount for the services in a PO?

Hello SAPients!
Scenario: I have a PO with one item, this Item has 3 services attached, this one item of the PO has been invoiced.
I need to split the invoiced amount into its corresponding amounts for each of the services. Is there a transaction code to see that? A table? FM? Class? Anything? Any idea is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

It comes under the 'Invoice' tab in Item Details in PO Creation (ME21N and ME22N).
Check LE-Related Invoice Verification is Optional in field settings for PO. (I think this is the field in config).
Lakshman

Invoice price block,PO in different currency

Hi,
The PO and the invoice are in different currency and the invoice is price blocked.
1.What do i do?
2.And how to check the difference in amount if the currency of PO and invoice are different?And what is to be done for it?
3.The accounting document is already created for the invoice.Does this mean the invoice is already posted?If yes, does it mean it is possible to post an invoice even if some of its items are blocked?

Hi
If invoice currency (say USD) is different from PO currency (INR), then you can enter invoice currency (USD) in invoice under basic data tab -next to amount field. Then PO currency (INR) will be calculated with invoice currency (USD) exchange rate on that date and new value will be proposed in USD.
If the exchange rate is not taken care then it will go to expense/stock account.
Thanks
Edited by: Praveen Raghavendra on Dec 23, 2008 9:51 AM

Query in fetching invoice amount from table EKBE

Hi all,
In my custom report the invoice amount is taken from the field ekbe-dmbtr and is displayed wrongly.
For a particular Purchase order the account assignment table EKKN has only one entry and for the same Purchase order the Purchase order history table EKBE has two entries.
For eg :
Table EKKN
Purchase order       Item               Seq Access number
20900753               000001            01
Table EKBE
Purchase order       Item               Seq Access number   Material Doc Number        Amount(DMBTR)
20900753               000001            01                              5105606685                      500
20900753               000001            99                              5105606685                      500
There is a loop at EKBE within the loop there is a IF condition which checks if
IF EKBE-PO number EQ EKKN-PO number and
EKBE-Item = EKKO-Item and
EKBE-Seq Access Number = EKKN-Seq Access number.
When the above condition is satisfied then the EKBE-DMBTR is added to the o/p field.
ENdloop.
In this case(several account exists for one mat doc,accounting dept use occasionally such cases) since EKKN does not hv seq access number 99 it does not take the second line into consideration so the amount displayed in the output has the value 500 instead of expected value 1000(sum of both the lines 01 and 99)
Can you please offer suggestion on how to solve this issue.I want to know if i can ommit the Seq access number check in the IF condition.In that case i would get the expected result 1000,but will it affect some other functionality.Or is there any other way to solve this.

Hi,
     We cannot say that Seq Access number is unimportant as it depends on the requirements of the client.....
Seq Access is a number defining the account assignment i. e which account should be posted in a transaction ( see documentation of the data element of seq Access ).
We can omit checking of sequential number . Use read table EKKN instead of IF condition as we can check for multiple values of table EKKN.
Thanks,
Viquar Iqbal

Consignment Vendor Invoice Amount Adjustment

Dear All,
Normally in SAP, The vendor invoices for consignment in purchasing is posted from MRKO. There is no invoice posting from MIRO.
In MRKO, after entering the selection details, we choose SETTLE for processing type, then we run it and vendor invoice is posted.
So I wonder how can our client make some adjustments for very small differences in the price ? Because normally there may be some differences like 0,50 EUR because of the roundings. So how will these difference amounts will be posted ?
Thx in advance

Hi,
MR11 shows the amount for GI/IR account if there is any.. But in consignment case.. you put the price to inforecord, then withdrawals occur. According to these withdrawals you settle the vendor invoice. But the price is already captured from the inforecord. When you settle it, SAP assumes the price as the inforecord price. That is ok. But because of the roundings (because it is only two digit after comma) the real vendor invoice may be different like 0,50 eur (for example you posted 300 EUR, but real invoice is 300,50 EUR)
This happens very frequently for our customer. So MR11 is useless for that case. There shall be some other trx to make these differences to be posted. So how will the 0,50 EUR posted ? This 0,50 eur will not appear in MR11

MCE3 : PO value/GR value/Invoice amount/invoice amount

Once we excute the MCE3 transaction by giving selection parameters as Period from and to and Purchasing Org.
When i see the report
Vendor PO Value GR Value Invoice amount invoice amount
X 25761 20805 19781 27249
Please explain the i above case two invoice amounts are different,Why it so
And explain the functionality

Hi
If you press F1
1) Invoice Amount
<GLamount>Amount, which is set by the vendors in the invoice.
Use
In the standard system, the Purchasing Information System updates this key figure in local currency upon invoice receipt on the purchase order date of the schedule line ( information structure S011, S012).
2) Invoice amount as at posting date
Both are different Please check the above
Hope it helps
Thanks /karthik

WHT should be deducted on payment amount instead of invoice amount

Hi All,
if any one help,
i am using 11i and issue is that, while matching PO (which is in USD) and making an invoice, but paying partially then WHT is deducted on invoice amount rather then payment amount.
if i match PO ( which is in functional currency i.e. PKR) then there is no issue and system calculate the tax on payment amount.
Please suggest!
thanks in advance...............
Regards
Asad
Edited by: 801240 on Dec 8, 2010 10:55 PM
Edited by: 801240 on Dec 8, 2010 10:55 PM

I havent worked on 11i But in r12 we can choose Apply Witholding tax "at Payment time" in payable Options
Navigation: Payables Responsibility>>Setup>>Optionn>>Payables Options>>Witholdin tax tab Select "At payment time" in Apply witholding tax area.
You said when invoice is of PKR its deducting on payment but on USD its deducting on invoice amount.
thus i rekon you have different options as per operating units
Send me your system option Screenshots on [email protected] then i will be able to help you better.
Edited by: Attiq on Dec 14, 2010 3:20 AM

Urgent:The PR was splited into two requirements in MRP list

Dear All,
I came across an strange scenario: when checked the material *** stock/requirements in MD04 within Plant A, i found
that it is different from relevant stock/requirements in Plant B, a PR was splited into two requirements in B which was not what
we wanted. But when MRP run again, the result was correct.
Process as follows:
Pr (plant A)-->(ALE)-->LSF(plant B)-->PR (plant B)
Now this cases had had a serious effort on our purchasing plan.
Could you please help me to analyse it? Thanks!

Hi,
From your post the understanding is :
You have two plants : Plant "A" the planning plant and Plant "B" the production plant
The demand in plant "A" creates a pland.order or pur.req which is a intercompany PR.
the PR from Plant "A" is transfered or ALE d through ( Background job ) as a requirement in plant "B" which after the MRP run in Plant "B" generates a PR.
this scenario would have serious business reasons ( Like Plant "A" can also be used for return materials or to have a planning data clarity or the configuration may be for both MTO and MTS scenario's )
If you can just give hint of your business type i can explain you the reasons and tell you about the settings.
thanks,
Prakash

Same amount of AWT has different base_amount.

Same withholding Tax Line shows different function/Base Amount if there are two item lines with same amount.
ap_invoice_distributions_all table shows different base amount for AWT tax lines like followings.
Invoice Id      LINE_TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE         Amount    Base_amount
209229170     AWT                              -31030        -31030
209229170   AWT                                -31030        -31029
209229170   AWT                                -3100          -3100
209229170    AWT                               -3100          -3099
Here shows difference between 31030 and 31029 which should be same , 3100 and 3099 which should also be same.

Other can be Album Artwork, Notes, Contacts, Firmware etc. or files that are on there if you are using the iPod as a removable storage device. If you feel that Other is being incorrectly reported then try restoring your iPod. Restoring will erase the iPod's hard drive, reload the software and put it back to default settings. Once the restore is complete follow the on screen instructions and it should connect to iTunes and give you a prompt to automatically update your library onto the fresh installation. If you want to update manually or using selected playlists choose no and it will default to manual mode and you can choose whatever setting you like: Restoring iPod to factory settings with iTunes 7

A/R Invoice amount splited into 2 different posting periods

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for