Customer scenario

Hello Experts,
Good day to you.
I am new SAP SD learner.Can you please share link or document which contain customer scenario regarding the BOM , PRICING, FREE GOODS, different business scenario along with solution. It will help to do hands of those scenario to build confidence.
Please provide your valuable guidance.
Any help will be appreciated....

Hi,
This may be helpful to you
How to use SCN search
Jobi

Similar Messages

Extended Notifications - Custom Scenario

Hello all,
i want to create a custom scenario. When i start transaction swnconfig and move to the scenario view and click new entry i have to select a category. The categories are linked to the scenarios already existing. But my new sceanrio has no category assigned yet so im stuck...
I need a new sceanrio, as i have to create a new handler class and dont want to interfere with the standard sceanrio "STANDARD".
Any ideas?
regards,
Markus

Hello Jocelyn,
thx for the quick answer. The problem i have is, when i do click "New entries" and add a new category i get an error.
E.g.: I add as a new scenario "ZNEWSCEN". As the new category i add "ZNEWCAT". When i press enter i get an error message "Entry ZNEWSCEN ZNEWCAT doesnt exists in SWN_CATEGORY."
When i use transaction SWNADMIN to create a new category, this will be created for the standard scenario "Workflow".... u see, im stuck...
Why i need a new scenario is because we use a personal profile for each employee (custom ESS sceanrio) where the employee can determin whether he want to get notification emails or not. I found the Method "IF_SWN_SCENARIO~RETRIEVE_NOTIFICATIONS" of the respective handler class perfect for this issue. All i have to do there is to determine the actual agent and check whether he want to receive a notification or not. If yes, the notification will be send back to the method-caller, if not, then not.
regards,
Markus
P.S.: we are on NW04 SP17

Function code for notification in a custom scenario

Hi,
Does anyone know the activity code or function code for a notification that needs to be sent to the organiser of a training event if the maximum capacity of the event is exceeded, i.e. the attendee goes on the waiting list.
There seems to be no standard activity type which gets triggered the moment the max. capacity of the training event is exceeded.(unlike BOKP)
Does anyone know the workaround for this ?
As far as I know you cannot create your own activity based on your custom scenario.
Hence how to handle this ?

You can use CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN and populate the parameter IT_SERVICE_OS
or use BAPI_OPPORTUNITY_CHANGEMULTI and populate the parameter SERVICE_OS.
BR,
Florin

MSS- ISR Custom Scenario for JSP iView

Hi,
I have copied the standard scenario to Custom scenario from SPPD to ZPPD and added some more Characteristic and re-generated the iView which generated a *.PAR file.
I have extracted the *.Par file and made changes to Properties file and create new JSP IView that i mentioned in Properties file (as per the cook book) and added these fields to New *.Par file and mentioned the same in field Portal Component in transaction QISRSCENARIO.
The *.Par file have been uploaded to Portal and page displayed with all Characteristic mentioned in scenario.
here is my Question.
How do i remove the standard fields (like Applicant , Telephone and Department)that are not mentioned in characterics.
and Also , all field the are displayed in input type,any code changes to attribute of JSP are not reflecting in page layout. it looks like the layout is not generated from the modified JSP..
Can any body let me know where can i fix that.
Thanks
Dasari

>>>How do i remove the standard fields (like Applicant , Telephone and Department)that are not mentioned in characterics.
You can comment the fields that are not needed on the JSP itself
>>>
all field are displayed in input type,any code changes to attribute of JSP are not reflecting in page layout. it looks like the layout is not generated from the modified JSP..
If you make any changes to the JSP, it is always better to redeploy the par file.
Regards,
Suresh Datti

Tile task count for Approve Request custom scenario displays '???'

Dear all,
I've configured 'Approve Request' application for a custom Scenario like this:
With this task definition:
In /IWWRK/IF_TGW_SCENARIO~GET_TASK_COUNT method for ZCL_FUND_TASK_COUNT class I've defined the corresponding code for get Task count. This method has a breakpoint, and execution stops when I've clicked corresponding tile, but previously task count in tile displays '???':
Before I've clicked on tile, application runs successfully. Any idea for solve this issue?
Thanks very much and regards.
Luis

Hi Masa,
I've get the following error:
Regards.
Luis.

Service & spares not billed to customer scenario

Dear friends,
We have a scenario where the customer location wil be defined as functional locations.Now when the equipement has to be repaired the customer informs the cs department about the same.A service notification will be created in the system.
Now the issue is how to map this process as the customer is neither billed for the service charges,spares replaced or rather the resources used(resource related billing). The service charges are collected at the begining as a contract for the whole year.
If at all a service order is created with refrence to the service notification which involves a spares replacement:
1)How the service orders will be created and wat all things the service order will have.
2)delivery will be created on wat basis
3)If at all a billing is done how the cost will be settled.(Since in realtime the customer is never charged for service provided or spares or reources)
Please suggest how to map this type of scenario
Thanks & regards
AJ

Hi,
This is SERVICE ORDER PROCESSING WITH SERVICE CONTREACT, and RESOURCE RELATED BILLING is optional.
(A)SERVICE ORDER PROCESSING WITH SERVICE CONTREACT
1. Create Service contract - VA41
    maintain price agreement condition type,
    go to EXTRA menu>>>> technical object, here u can speciefy your equipemt details.
2. Create notification (IW51) & assign contract in notification
3. Create service order(IW34) with refrance to privious notification, and
    maintain settlement rule as SDI & Settlement reciever is your service contract number&its items
4. Confirmation of service order (IW41/IW42)
5. Settlement of order(KO88)
    After this you can go your service order and see settle cost
   Also go in service cntract>>>Environment>>>cost report, see settle cost appearing in contract.
6.And last settle this service contract(VA88).
(B) RESOURCE RELATED BILLING(optional)
1. follow above steps (1 TO 4)
2. Create resource related billing (DP90)
    System will genrate billing request
3. Create biing document(VF01) with refrance to billing request
    After this go in service contract, cost report and see billing value
4. settle the service contract(VA88)
5. Now settle the service order(KO88)
After this go in service contract>>> cost report, and see settled cost
Note : In this scenario revnue is come from billing and cost is come from service order, this all is place against service contract.
treat revnue come from conract as advance recieved from customer for services, and when you crete resource related billing,clear this amount against contract value.
Rgards,
kapil
Edited by: Kapildev Farakte on Nov 5, 2009 12:50 PM

Modeling custom scenario-imp

hi all
i have a custom table ztab in which we are caputuring some
revenue data . it consists of bill# , bill item # and
bill amount . none of these are key fields.we are using this custom table
as a data src for our bw ods and cube . there is a possibility that
once a bill comes in , it might be cancelled after few days . in that
case there should be a -ve posting for all key figures . Can someone
help me implement this scenario . I am not sure how i should model
this situation . Should i add a new field 'status' that shows
the status of the bills ?? My purpose is that if a bill gets cancelled
, the key figures in bw should be reversed.
pls help ..all inputs welcome

Hi,
I reckon when a bill is canceled, the corresonding records get deleted in your custom ztab.
In this case you should consider a full loading scenario. Every time the cube's data get deleted, and refreshed through the new loading process.
Cheers, <a href="https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/Davide+Cavallari">Davide</a>

Custom Scenario requiring table Lock - Please Suggest

Hi ,
Custom usecase :
There exist a table with following column :
FileName, LastUpdatedBy, ApprovedBy, DisapprovedBy, LogicallyDeleted, FileDescription, Col2
Primary Key - ( FileName, LastUpdatedBy,ApprovedBy)
Constraint : FileName,lastUpdatedBy,ApprovedBy cannot be null. Default values for LastUpdatedBy, ApprovedBy, DisapprovedBy is NONE, and LogicallyDeleted is N.
Note : User should not be allowed to create more that two records for same fileName.
Edit functionality required on UI : On editing a record, a copy of the row should be created with same fileName , LastUpdatedBy with userId of logged in User.
How should I restrict user from doing the following :
Two users open the UI. Selected same record to edit. At time of commit only record for one should get commited, while for other it should not happen as 2 records gets created for same file name as soon as commit is done for one user.
Do i need to have table lock, then count row with a particular file name and if count >2 then commit else throw some exception. And if this is needs to be done than which method should be overridden to do that.
Thanks,
Rajdeep

Hi
To Shay : ( You can define a new method validation at the entity level to do the check for you. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16162_01/web.1112/e16182/bcvalidation.htm#CACGFEDC )
From my post : - Where should that logic can be implemented in ADF BC and what logic ( anything different from what I mentioned in post ) ?
If I am going to write validation in custom method at entity level, I think it is not handling the scenario properly. For example : Query for Count on fileName records is fired in validator method for two entities before the commit is happening for any of the two.
Also What logic : do you agree with table lock logic requirement here ?
To Santosh,
I think you didn't got the scenario. It does not talk about two user doing normal edit on same record. Notice two facts mentioned in post :
1. When a user selects a record to edit... he is not actually editing it. We create a copy of the row ( with FileName , LastUpdatedBy,ApprovedBy,LogicallyDeleted as readOnly and prepopulated with sameFileName as original record, UserId in LastUpdatedBy, NONE defaults for Approved by and Disapproved By , N default for LogicallyDeleted) launched in popup. Popup has two buttons ... save and cancel. On cancel we rollback transaction ( i.e. deletes the newly created copy ) and Save ... eventually commits the row.
2. Not more two records should get created in table for same fileName. So two users trying to edit same record will eventually try to create the 3 records in database table. It should fail for 3rd one...
What logic should be written ... Does it really need the table lock ? Etc
Thanks,
Rajdeep

Increase the data access time in custom development scenarios,layouts etc.

Hello All,
We have developed some custom scenario come interface for our Man-hours planning and actual posting. We have also included some validation in them from time to time. Now, it has started taking much processing time during data entry as well as during data saving.
Kindly suggest how can we reduce this time consumption.
Thanks & Regards
Saurabh

Hi Suarabh,
If I am not wrong you need to increase performance.
Use the basis abap standard best practices to acheive this.
This link can be helpful to you ...
ABAP Performance and Tuning - ABAP Development - SCN Wiki
SAP ABAP : best practices - performance techniques | SAP Consulting Development Implementation Remote Support Blog

Standard customer field to FAGLGLEXT table

Hi,
I have included a standard coding block field COBL_WERKS (Plant - ZZWERKS) to the totals table. After I have added this as a customer scenario to the ledgers, I can see this field in the totals table. This is required as the classic PCA is able to provide this dimension.
When the accouting documents are generating from MM module in terms of Goods issue and Goods reciept, the plant info is flowing to the FI documents and updating the BSEG and FAGLFLEXT tables as well.
But when the accouting documents are creating upon the process order confirmations for the activities (material, labor), the plant info is not updating to the FI line items and totals table. Typically the additional FI documents are creating due to CO-FI real time integration and we have several substitions to derive the primary cost elements. At the same time, I am able to see the plant info in table COEP, 8A ledger etc. whereas this is not coming to the FI accounting document from CO module. (PP->CO->*FI*)
Is anybody have an idea why the customer field 'Plant' is missing for some of the processes generating from logistic modules.
Would really appreciate for your kind help.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramki
Edited by: Ramki on Dec 9, 2011 12:08 PM

Hi,
We have debugged the transaction and found that the BADi FAGL_COFI_ACCIT_MOD updating field 'Plant' COBL_WERKS whereas the accounting interface is not updating this field in BSEG_WERKS and FAGLFLEXT table.
Somehow we found that the connection between COBL and BSEG is missing for additional field 'WERKS'
Would really appreciate if anybody provide some useful info regarding.
Thanks,
Ramki
Edited by: Ramki on Dec 13, 2011 5:00 PM

Unable to extract Customer Master data from MDC

Hello,
We creating an MDM-XI-ERP2005 Customer scenario. We want to work with all bussiness scenarios (not customizing scenario).
First I'm trying to extract Customer Master Data from EP 2005 using MDM_CLNT_EXTR.
I have created a New Variant which properties are:
Variant: CUSTOMER_TOTAL
Description: Send all customer data to MDM
Extraction Object: CUSTOMER_EXTRACT.
Target System: PI7.
But, the display jobs shows the following error: Could not determine recipients for message type MDMRECEIPT. Job cancelled after system exception.
We need to focus the problem. We have done the following ALE configuration.
SALE transaction:
In Basic Settings -> Logical Systems -> Define Logical System we have add the following logical systems:
              EUS100
              MDM: Master Data Management
              PI7: Process Integration 7.0
WE21:
Transactional RFC -> PI7, IDOC record types SAP Release 4.x
RFC destination: SAPSLDAPI
BD64
New Model -> PFMC
Add message type: Model iview: PFMC
                             Sender: EUS100
                              Receiver: PI7
                             Message Type: DEBMDM
WE20 transaction shows:
Partner profiles -> Partner Type LS (logical system)
                    PI7: Outbound parmtrs. DEBMDM, SYNCH.
Any idea will be very helpful,
Thanks in advance
Marta.
Edited by: Marta Sánchez on Jul 9, 2008 12:34 PM

Sorry because I made a mistake in my previous message. ALE seems to be correctly configured. I'll try to update correctly my current situation:
In WE02 I can see al IDOCs that I'm trying to send to XI. All them have the IDoc Status = 3 (Data Passed to Port OK) instead of 12 Status Dispatch OK :(. So, It seems an tRFC error.
SM58 shows me more trails: "Basic type 'DEBMDM06' is unknown"
before that I have done the following steps at SAP ERP:
    1. WE21: I have created a PI7 port with 700PI70CLNT RFC.
    2. SM59: I have checked successfully 700PI70CLNT RFC connection.
    3. WE20: I have created a PI7 Partner Type LS with the following inbound and outbound parameters: DEBMDM and MDMRECEIPT.
    4. BD64: I have created a Distribution Model with DEBMDM and MDMRECEIPT message types.
and at SAP PI:
     5.IDX: Port: SAPEUS. Client: 111. RFC Destination: PI7.
     6. technical and business system for sender SAP system(System Landscape Directory)...
- Maybe some of the previous steps is not correct....
- Is RFC Destination = PI7 is correct in step #5?
- Is also necessary to configure more steps in PI system like RFC destinations or Transactional port?
- I have read that is neccessary to check that the option "transfer idoc immediately" in we20. How?
Please any idea will be very helpful.......
Thank you!
Best regards,
Marta.

Generate CF (Customs Form) 7501 - Entry Summary

Hello Folks,
We use F8 (Proforma Invoice) to trigger CF 7525 V - Shippers Export Declaration. If the scenario involves implementation of SAP GTS Customs scenario, we transfer F8 and this is independent of we transferring Sales Order or Outbound Delivery Note to SAP GTS. My question is the following.
- Import scenario - SAP GTS 7.2
- Import Documentation after Good Receipt
- Generate CF 7501 - Entry Summary in GTS
- No Inbound Delivery created in SAP (PO followed by a GR)
- Do we still need Inbound Delivery even though we tranfer Good Receipt/Material Document to SAP GTS
- Can we use G/R to trigger creation of the Import Docs which was created with Ref. to a PO
I am sure someone must have had come across a similar challenge in their assignment. I will be glad if someone can throw some light on this scenario. All SAP Documents insist that the Material Document is created with Ref. to the Inbound Delivery.
Thanks folks.
RJ

Hi Rohit,
Check these
How to Generate commercial Invoice and Shippers letter of instructions?
Regards,
PS

Multiple O365 Tenants, Single Authentication Scenario, AD-FS, Azure Questions

I have a customer scenario which is a group company with multiple companies within it. Here are the different questions that I am supposed to answer them.
They have multiple entities each having their own O365 tenant
Each of them their own On-Premise AD and have their AD-FS Configured, so users are able to login through their AD Usernames to their O365 Subscription
Now they want to setup up a Central Workspace (assume it is setup as a new O365 – SharePoint Online tenant) – which all of these companies can post and share data with, there is a Group Head Office, which controls this and they have their own AD as well
In this central workspace, there will be documents shared, tasks created, discussion forums, surveys, social features etc.
They do not want to do any AD Consolidation – so they are asking me – how will the authentication work in the future – each of the group company users should be able to login with their AD Username itself
Is this possible? If so, How can we do this?
Also with respect to Performance, it will be around 2000 users using this central workspace – so will O365 – SharePoint Online automatically scale or is there any special configuration that needs to be done?
In the future, they are looking at extending this to 3<sup>rd</sup> party companies as well to share information with – so there is a question as to how they can get authenticated as well (External Sharing is not really their preference)
so is there like an FBA – Claims (Custom Login Page) we can setup along with Self-Registration capabilities?
Again, when around 10000 users use this later, how will O365 – SharePoint Online perform?
In the future, how will Yammer and the new Office Groups work? Will Yammer go away? What is the direction that Microsoft is taking?
Would be great to get your responses at the earliest possible.
Karthick S

I have not seen this on here yet....http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/29/top-feminist-issues-stunning-rebuke-for-medias-total-silence-on-pl...http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_...fta: A major feminist author and former Planned Parenthood member shredded the U.S. media Wednesday for its “shockingly unprofessional” failure to cover the release of secret videos showing alleged trafficking in fetal organs by employees of Planned Parenthood. ... .. Now let me give you a recent example of the persisting insularity of liberal thought in the media. When the first secret Planned Parenthood video was released in mid-July, anyone who looks only at liberal media was kept totally in the dark about it, even after the second video was released.also fta: I regard Donald Trump as an art...

Subcontracting for a Customer

Dear Friends,
My client has the below scenario :
Scenario 1: Step 1 : Customer supplies Raw Material A
                    Step 2 : Client does goods inwards
                    Step 3 : Processing happens at Clients Shop floor (RAW MATL "A" becomes "B")
                    Step 4: Issues to customer Material "B"
                    Step 5 : Invoices Customer for only processing charges
Scenario 2: Step 1 : Customer supplies Raw Material A
                    Step 2 : Client does goods inwards
                    Step 3 : Processing happens at Clients Shop floor (RAW MATL "A" becomes "B")
                    Step 4 : Material "B " is issued by client to his own subcontractor for some further processing to become "C"
                    Step 5: Receipt of Matl "C" by client from subcontractor
                    Step 6: Clients pays the subcontract for processing charges
                    Step 7: Processing again happens at Clients Shop floor ( "C" becomes "D")
                    Step 8: Issues to customer Material "D"
                    Step 9 : Invoices Customer for ALL processing charges
NOTE at all stages Materials are NON VALUATED.. since we do not want customer material to affect our stock values.How to Map this.
Kindly help and guide
Thanks
nandu

Hi,
You can adopt the following steps
For scenario 1:
1) Create a Free goods PO
2) Recieve the material A against the PO
3) Issue the material for PP inhouse processes
4) Raise a Sales order and send back the processed material to customer
Scenario 2:
1) Create a Free goods PO
2) Recieve the material A(UNBW) against the PO
3)Raise a subcontracting PO with item category L
5) Issue the material to the customer( vendor ) th MB1B -541
6) Recieve the material th MIGO for the O/P material(UNBW)
7) Issue the material for Inhouse production
8) Raise a Sales order and send back the processed material to customer along with the Invoice.
Regards
Sandeep

ISR ADOBE Workflow Scenario - Data doesn't update the Backend

Hi,
I am currently working on ISR-LOA Scenario. I have made all the ISR-Form-Process configurations and linked with my workflow. I event tested my process in the backend and portal. The process goes end to end. But does not update the infotyptes. No error was reported either in Portal or Backend. I was able to complete the termination process by copying the SAP standard scenario (STN1) and the workflow task WS17900391. But this LOA is a custom scenario. I dont see any difference? But i am really puzzled about this.
As a simple process My workflow contains Task TS17900101 - Approve Form task and a mail step. According to, http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/42/f280b91e5132c3e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
the approve form step doesn't update the backend directly. I also tried task TS17900102 and TS17900108 (Save Data - Background Processing). I also applied authorizations P_ASRCONT and P_ORGIN to WF-Batch user. Please give me your suggestions.
I was continuing the completed thread Re: Events Definition in Adobe Interactive Form - Help required, but i am opening this new thread.
Thanks,
Peterson.

Hi
         I am facing some strange problem, in my project we are using the new HCM concept using Process Object and not the Notification type,
      I have take standard scenario SBC1 - child birth, done the config and checked the form and also process its not giving any error.
    But when i tried test process execution "HRASR_TEST_PROCESS", getts error message " Work Item Not Found; Workflow Not Started" and "Process Object Not Created",
when i check the log in SLG1 tcode for Object: HRASR, Subobject: POBJ. "Case 46CC2D7604BB275EE1000000995893A9 does not exist. No administration authorization in Change and Transport System", this error message only consfuse me more.
    Can you help me on this, if you required i will send the screen shot of the error message

Customer scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for