@DatePart formula produces constant result

Currently using an @datapart formula and it consistently produces the same result regardless of date.
Here is my member formula:
@datepart("Lease date",DP_Year)
The result is always 1970
Another member formula for month
@datepart("lease date",DP_Month)
The result is always 8 regardless of month

Hi,
Provided that you have installed the string CDF pack from below url, you can use below formula:
(http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/indexes/samplecode/essbase-sample-522117.html)
Don't worry if it looks complicated, all it does is to convert planning date format to Essbase's.
@DatePart(@TODATEEX ("mm/dd/yyyy",
@JconcatStrings(@LIST(
/*Generate mm*/
@JgetStringFromDouble (@ROUND(("DateMember"-@ROUND("DateMember"/10000,0)*10000)/100,0),@_false,@_false),"/",
/*Generate dd*/
@JgetStringFromDouble ("DateMember"-(@ROUND("DateMember"/10000,0)*10000+
@ROUND(("DateMember"-@ROUND("DateMember"/10000,0)*10000)/100,0)*100),@_false,@_false),"/",
/*Generate yyyy*/
@JgetStringFromDouble (@ROUND("DateMember"/10000,0),@_false,@_false) )
),DP_MONTH);
Cheers,
Alp

Similar Messages

Formula Node Floor(x) Produces Different Result

Hi, A search didn't find anything about the Floor(x) function, so... I'm using LabVIEW 6.0.2, and the Floor(x)function in a Formula Node seems to be producing different results depending on previous calculations. I've got the following 2 lines in a Formula Node:
MSS = Ref / RefDiv;
MDN = floor(RF / MSS);
Ref is always 20.0M, RefDiv always 500.0, and for this calcualtion RF is always 1539.4, all numbers Double with 6 digits of precision. I generate an array of frequencies given a start, step, and frequency count. These frequencies then go to a subVI with a Formula Node that calculates the byte values to send to a couple PLLs.
If Start = 70.1, Step = .025, and Count = 20, at frequency 70.2 the Floor function gives 38.485.
If Start = 70.0, Step = .025, and Count = 20, at frequency 70.2 the Floor function gives 38.484.
I've omitted some calc steps here, but I've verified the starting values in the subVI are the same in both cases. Why the result changes I'm hoping someone can tell me...
Thanks,
Steve

I want to thank those involved again for their help. With ideas and hints from others I found a solution without scaling.
In recap, what had bothered me was it *appeared* like the same subVI was giving correct results one time and incorrect results only randomly. While I understand binary fractional imprecision, I wasn't doing any looped calculations 100+ times or anything.
I did some more checking though. The problem was indeed introduced by cumulative fractional addition. In this case 10 additions were enought to cause the error. Apparently, floor(71.199_94) produces 72.0. However, using a shift register and constant fraction to add an offset to produce an array introduces enough error in under 10 iterations to be a problem. By the time the loop got to what was supposed to be 72.0, it was actually 71.199_84 or something, enough to throw the floor function. Now I understand why the error occurred, and why it wasn't a problem before.
I fixed this problem by changing the real frequency number to a I32 before introduction to the formula node. This corrected the error introduced by the fractional addition by forcing 71.199_84 to 72, instead of letting it propagate through the rest of the calculations. And it was a whole lot easier than changing all the VIs to allow scaling! Also, I prefer to know where and why the problem happened, instead of just scaling all my calcualtions. Maybe I can recoginse potential problems in the future.
My boss wants to go back and look at his program to see if HPVee somehow bypassed the problem or if he did the calculations differently.
Thanks again for the insight and help,
Steve

Filter expression producing different results after upgrade to 11.1.1.7

Hello,
We recently did an upgrade and noticed that on a number of reports where we're using the FILTER expression that the numbers are very inflated. Where we are not using the FILTER expression the numbers are as expected. In the example below we ran the 'Bookings' report in 10g and came up with one number and ran the same report in 11g (11.1.1.7.0) after the upgrade and got two different results. The data source is the same database for each envrionment. Also, in running the physical SQL generated by the 10g and 11g version of the report we get different the inflated numbers from the 11g SQL. Any ideas on what might be happening or causing the issue?
10g report: 2016-Q3......Bookings..........72,017
11g report: 2016-Q3......Bookings..........239,659
This is the simple FILTER expression that is being used in the column formula on the report itself for this particular scenario which produces different results in 10g and 11g.
FILTER("Fact - Opportunities"."Won Opportunity Amount" USING ("Opportunity Attributes"."Business Type" = 'New Business'))
-------------- Physical SQL created by 10g report -------- results as expected --------------------------------------------
WITH
SAWITH0 AS (select sum(case when T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS = 'Won-closed' then T33231.USD_LINE_AMOUNT else 0 end ) as c1,
T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME as c2,
T28761.QUARTER_RANK as c3
from
XXFI.XXFI_GL_FISCAL_MONTHS_V T28761 /* Dim_Periods */ ,
XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_HEADER_ACCUM T33142 /* Fact_Opportunity_Headers(CloseDate) */ ,
XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_LINE_ACCUM T33231 /* Fact_Opportunity_Lines(CloseDate) */
where ( T28761.PERIOD_NAME = T33142.CLOSE_PERIOD_NAME and T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME = '2012-Q3' and T33142.LEAD_ID = T33231.LEAD_ID and T33231.LINES_BUSINESS_TYPE = 'New Business' and T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS <> 'Duplicate' )
group by T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME, T28761.QUARTER_RANK)
select distinct SAWITH0.c2 as c1,
'Bookings10g' as c2,
SAWITH0.c1 as c3,
SAWITH0.c3 as c5,
SAWITH0.c1 as c7
from
SAWITH0
order by c1, c5
-------------- Physical SQL created by the same report as above but in 11g (11.1.1.7.0) -------- results much higher --------------------------------------------
WITH
SAWITH0 AS (select sum(case when T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS = 'Won-closed' then T33142.TOTAL_OPPORTUNITY_AMOUNT_USD else 0 end ) as c1,
T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME as c2,
T28761.QUARTER_RANK as c3
from
XXFI.XXFI_GL_FISCAL_MONTHS_V T28761 /* Dim_Periods */ ,
XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_HEADER_ACCUM T33142 /* Fact_Opportunity_Headers(CloseDate) */ ,
XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_LINE_ACCUM T33231 /* Fact_Opportunity_Lines(CloseDate) */
where ( T28761.PERIOD_NAME = T33142.CLOSE_PERIOD_NAME and T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME = '2012-Q3' and T33142.LEAD_ID = T33231.LEAD_ID and T33231.LINES_BUSINESS_TYPE = 'New Business' and T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS <> 'Duplicate' )
group by T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME, T28761.QUARTER_RANK),
SAWITH1 AS (select distinct 0 as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
'Bookings2' as c3,
D1.c3 as c4,
D1.c1 as c5
from
SAWITH0 D1),
SAWITH2 AS (select D1.c1 as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
D1.c3 as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5,
sum(D1.c5) as c6
from
SAWITH1 D1
group by D1.c1, D1.c2, D1.c3, D1.c4, D1.c5)
select D1.c1 as c1, D1.c2 as c2, D1.c3 as c3, D1.c4 as c4, D1.c5 as c5, D1.c6 as c6 from ( select D1.c1 as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
D1.c3 as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5,
sum(D1.c6) over () as c6
from
SAWITH2 D1
order by c1, c4, c3 ) D1 where rownum <= 2000001
Thank you,
Mike
Edited by: Mike Jelen on Jun 7, 2013 2:05 PM

Thank you for the info. They are definitely different values since ones on the header and the other is on the lines. As the "Won Opportunity" logical column is mapped to multiple LTS it appears the OBI 11 uses a different alogorthim to determine the most efficient table to use in the query generation vs 10g. I'll need to spend some time researching the impact to adding a 'sort' to the LTS. I'm hoping that there's a way to get OBI to use similar logic relative to 10g in how it generated the table priority.
Thx again,
Mike

SQL Query produces different results when inserting into a table

I have an SQL query which produces different results when run as a simple query to when it is run as an INSERT INTO table SELECT ...
The query is:
SELECT   mhldr.account_number
,        NVL(MAX(DECODE(ap.party_sysid, mhldr.party_sysid,ap.empcat_code,NULL)),'UNKNWN') main_borrower_status
,        COUNT(1) num_apps
FROM     app_parties ap
SELECT   accsta.account_number
,        actply.party_sysid
,        RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY actply.table_sysid, actply.loanac_latype_code ORDER BY start_date, SYSID) ranking
FROM     activity_players actply
,        account_status accsta
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      actply.table_id (+) = 'ACCGRP'
AND      actply.acttyp_code (+) = 'MHLDRM'
AND      NVL(actply.loanac_latype_code (+),TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))
AND      actply.table_sysid (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,1,8))
) mhldr
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      ap.lenapp_account_number (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(mhldr.account_number,1,8))
GROUP BY mhldr.account_number;      The INSERT INTO code:
TRUNCATE TABLE applicant_summary;
INSERT /*+ APPEND */
INTO     applicant_summary
( account_number
, main_borrower_status
, num_apps
SELECT   mhldr.account_number
,        NVL(MAX(DECODE(ap.party_sysid, mhldr.party_sysid,ap.empcat_code,NULL)),'UNKNWN') main_borrower_status
,        COUNT(1) num_apps
FROM     app_parties ap
SELECT   accsta.account_number
,        actply.party_sysid
,        RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY actply.table_sysid, actply.loanac_latype_code ORDER BY start_date, SYSID) ranking
FROM     activity_players actply
,        account_status accsta
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      actply.table_id (+) = 'ACCGRP'
AND      actply.acttyp_code (+) = 'MHLDRM'
AND      NVL(actply.loanac_latype_code (+),TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))
AND      actply.table_sysid (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,1,8))
) mhldr
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      ap.lenapp_account_number (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(mhldr.account_number,1,8))
GROUP BY mhldr.account_number;      When run as a query, this code consistently returns 2 for the num_apps field (for a certain group of accounts), but when run as an INSERT INTO command, the num_apps field is logged as 1. I have secured the tables used within the query to ensure that nothing is changing the data in the underlying tables.
If I run the query as a cursor for loop with an insert into the applicant_summary table within the loop, I get the same results in the table as I get when I run as a stand alone query.
I would appreciate any suggestions for what could be causing this odd behaviour.
Cheers,
Steve
Oracle database details:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.2.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
Edited by: stevensutcliffe on Oct 10, 2008 5:26 AM
Edited by: stevensutcliffe on Oct 10, 2008 5:27 AM

stevensutcliffe wrote:
Yes, using COUNT(*) gives the same result as COUNT(1).
I have found another example of this kind of behaviour:
Running the following INSERT statements produce different values for the total_amount_invested and num_records fields. It appears that adding the additional aggregation (MAX(amount_invested)) is causing problems with the other aggregated values.
Again, I have ensured that the source data and destination tables are not being accessed / changed by any other processes or users. Is this potentially a bug in Oracle?Just as a side note, these are not INSERT statements but CTAS statements.
The only non-bug explanation for this behaviour would be a potential query rewrite happening only under particular circumstances (but not always) in the lower integrity modes "trusted" or "stale_tolerated". So if you're not aware of any corresponding materialized views, your QUERY_REWRITE_INTEGRITY parameter is set to the default of "enforced" and your explain plan doesn't show any "MAT_VIEW REWRITE ACCESS" lines, I would consider this as a bug.
Since you're running on 10.2.0.2 it's not unlikely that you hit one of the various "wrong result" bugs that exist(ed) in Oracle. I'm aware of a particular one I've hit in 10.2.0.2 when performing a parallel NESTED LOOP ANTI operation which returned wrong results, but only in parallel execution. Serial execution was showing the correct results.
If you're performing parallel ddl/dml/query operations, try to do the same in serial execution to check if it is related to the parallel feature.
You could also test if omitting the "APPEND" hint changes anything but still these are just workarounds for a buggy behaviour.
I suggest to consider installing the latest patch set 10.2.0.4 but this requires thorough testing because there were (more or less) subtle changes/bugs introduced with [10.2.0.3|http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2008/02/nasty-bug-introduced-with-patch-set.html] and [10.2.0.4|http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2008/04/overview-of-new-and-changed-features-in.html].
You could also open a SR with Oracle and clarify if there is already a one-off patch available for your 10.2.0.2 platform release. If not it's quite unlikely that you are going to get a backport for 10.2.0.2.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Spatial Queries Not Always Producing Accurate Results

Hi,
Spatial queries are not always producing accurate results. Here are the issues. We would appreciate any clarification you could provide to resolve these issues.
1. When querying for points inside a polygon that is not an MBR (minimum bounded rectangle), some of the coordinates returned are not inside the polygon. It is as though the primary filter is working, but not the secondary filter when using sdo_relate. How can we validate that the spatial query using sdo_relate is using the secondary filter?
2. SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT returns true when validating geometries even though we find results that are invalid.
3. Illegal geodetic coordinates can be inserted into a table: latitude > 90.0, latitude < -90.0, longitude > 180.0 or longitude < -180.0.
4. Querying for coordinates outside the MBR for the world where illegal coordinates existed did NOT return any rows, yet there were coordinates of long, lat: 181,91.
The following are examples and information relating to the above-referenced points.
select * from USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA
TABLE_NAME      COLUMN_NAME      DIMINFO(SDO_DIMNAME, SDO_LB, SDO_UB, SDO_TOLERANCE)      SRID
LASTKNOWNPOSITIONS      THE_GEOM SDO_DIM_ARRAY(SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', -180, 180, .05), SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', -90, 90, .05))      8307
POSITIONS     THE_GEOM SDO_DIM_ARRAY(SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', -180, 180, .05), SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', -90, 90, .05))      8307
Example 1: Query for coordinates inside NON-rectangular polygon includes points outside of polygon.
SELECT l.vesselid, l.latitude, l.longitude, TO_CHAR(l.observationtime,
'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') as obstime FROM lastknownpositions l where
SDO_RELATE(l.the_geom,SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 8307, NULL,
SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-98.20268,18.05079,-57.30101,18.00705,-57.08229,
54.66061,-98.59638,32.87842,-98.20268,18.05079)),'mask=inside')='TRUE'
This query returns the following coordinates that are outside of the polygon:
vesselid : 1152 obstime : 2005-08-24 06:00:00 long : -82.1 lat : 45.3
vesselid : 3140 obstime : 2005-08-28 12:00:00 long : -80.6 lat : 44.6
vesselid : 1253 obstime : 2005-08-22 09:00:00 long : -80.0 lat : 45.3
Example 2a: Using SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT
Select areaid, the_geom,
SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(the_geom, 0.005) from area where
areaid=24
ResultSet:
AREAID THE_GEOM(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO,
SDO_ORDINATES) SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(THE_GEOM,0.005)
24 SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-98.20268, 18.05079, -57.30101, 18.00705, -57.08229, 54.66061, -98.59638, 32.87842, -98.20268, 18.05079)) TRUE
Example 2b: Using SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT
Select positionid, vesselid, the_geom,
SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(the_geom, 0.005) from positions where vesselid=1152
ResultSet:
POSITIONID VESSELID THE_GEOM(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z),
SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES) DO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(THE_GEOM,0.005)
743811 1152 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-82.1, 45.3, NULL), NULL, NULL) TRUE
743812 1152 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-82.1, 45.3, NULL), NULL, NULL) TRUE
743813 1152 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-80.2, 42.5, NULL), NULL, NULL) TRUE
743814 1152 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-80.2, 42.5, NULL), NULL, NULL) TRUE
Example 3: Invalid Coordinate values found in POSITIONS table.
SELECT p.positionid, p.latitude, p.longitude, p.the_geom FROM positions p
WHERE p.latitude < -180.0
2 lines from ResultSet:
POSITIONID LATITUDE LONGITUDE THE_GEOM(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES)
714915 -210.85408 -79.74449 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-79.74449, -210.85408, NULL), NULL, NULL)
714938 -211.13632 -79.951256 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-79.951256, -211.13632, NULL), NULL, NULL)
SELECT p.positionid, p.latitude, p.longitude, p.the_geom FROM positions p
WHERE p.longitude > 180.0
3 lines from ResultSet:
POSITIONID LATITUDE LONGITUDE THE_GEOM(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES)
588434 91 181 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(181, 91, NULL), NULL, NULL)
589493 91 181 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(181, 91, NULL), NULL, NULL)
589494 91 181 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(181, 91, NULL), NULL, NULL)
Example 4: Failure to locate illegal coordinates by querying for disjoint coordinates outside of MBR for the world:
SELECT p.vesselid, p.latitude, p.longitude, p.the_geom,
TO_CHAR(p.observationtime, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') as obstime,
SDO_GEOM.RELATE(p.the_geom, 'determine',
SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 8307, NULL,SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-180.0,-90.0,180.0,-90.0,180.0,90.0,
-180.0,90.0,-180.0,-90.0)), .005) relationship FROM positions p where
SDO_GEOM.RELATE(p.the_geom, 'disjoint', SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 8307,
NULL,SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-180.0,-90.0,180.0,-90.0,180.0,90.0,-80.0,90.0,
-180.0,-90.0)),.005)='TRUE'
no rows selected
Carol Saah

Hi Carol,
1) I think the results are correct. Note in a geodetic coordinate system adjacent points in a linestring or polygon are connected via geodesics. You are probably applying planar thinking to an ellipsoidal problem! I don't have time to do the full analysis right now, but a first guess is that is what is happening.
2) The query window seems to be valid. I don't think this is a problem.
3) Oracle will let you insert most anything into a table. In the index, it probably wraps. If you validate, I think the validation routines will tell you is is illegal if you use the signature with diminfo, where the coordinate system bounds are included in the validation.
4) Your query window is not valid. Your data is not valid. As the previous reply stated, you need to have valid data. If you think in terms of a geodetic coordinate system, you will realize that -180.0,-90.0 and 180.0,-90.0 are really the same point. Also, Oracle has a rule that polygon geometries cannot be greater than half the surface of the Earth.
Hope this helps.

IWeb Error: "Your search did not produce any results."

I just updated my iWeb and added the new search and comment features to my iWeb site. I am happy to see these features added but the search feature gives me a page displaying "Your search did not produce any results." Does anyone else have this issue? I am using my .Mac account and did a "Publish all to .Mac" to see if that would help. Comments work great. Can anyone help? Not good to have a feature that does not work.
Cheers!
Patrick

I am having the same problem and can probably give you an answer as to why the search feature is not working...
Look carefully and you may notice that by re-publishing your site with 1.1, iWeb has converted all text on your site to image files (probably .png). This is what happened when I re-published.
Therefore, there is technically no text to "search" through...
No fix as of yet... I will ttry to republish yet again tonight

Robohelp 9 WebHelp - Searching doesn't produce any results.

Hi, I upgraded to RoboHelp 9 last week and now searching in Webhelp doesn't produce any results. I've created a new project, used the sample project, tried generating it to a new folder and results remain the same.
When I select the search tab, the status bar flutters with the "Waiting for file...." displayed indefinetly with the occassion display of the javascript: (void);
Screens shots are from the RH 9 sample project. Results are the same with my projects. CHMs generated work fine!
Any suggestions?

Mary
You added the problem to another thread that was not related as the issue there is the use of HTTPS. I have deleted that post.
You also started a second thread with a the same question. I don't understand how asking the question twice will help so I have locked that thread but created a link to this thread so that anyone with an answer can help you. If there is a reason for starting a second thread, please let me know.
Please just ask once and wait for a reply as this wastes moderator's time that is better used trying to answer questions.
Now to the problem. Searching with Chrome installed works just fine for most people so the problem seems to be local to you. If I have read you correctly, after installing Chrome, the search breaks no matter what browser is used.
Was that checked on other machines or just yours?
IGNORE THIS QUESTION - The answer is YES and that was in the post.
Did you also check that search was broken with the supplied sample projects? I know that works with the three browsers being discussed here?
Where was the help installed when tested by you both standalone and from the application?
Questions 2 and 3 are really only related to problems with Chrome. I have not seen anyone report Chrome also breaking the search in the other browsers. There's more to this than meets the eye as Chrome has not caused that problem for anyone else, or at least, no one has reported it.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

Old outer join syntax produces different results from new syntax!

I have inherited a query that uses the old outer join syntax but that is yielding correct results. When I translate it to the new outer join syntax, I get the results I expect, but they are not correct! And I don't understand why the old syntax produces the results it produces. Bottom line: I want the results I'm getting from the old syntax, but I need it in the new syntax (I'm putting it into Reporting Services, and RS automatically converts old syntax to new).
Here's the query with the old outer join syntax that is working correctly:
Code Snippet
SELECT   TE = COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID),
         UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID),
         PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID)) /
              CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID))
FROM     TABLE T1, TABLE T2
WHERE    T1 *= T2
In this query, much to my surprise, TE <> UE and PE <> 1. However, TE, UE, and PE seem to be accurate!
Here's the query with the new outer join syntax that is working but not producing the results I need:
Code Snippet
SELECT   TE = COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID),
         UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID),
         PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID)) /
              CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID))
FROM     TABLE T1 LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID
Though not producing the results I need, it is producing what would be expected: TE = UE and PE = 1.
My questions:
1) Can someone who is familiar enough with the old syntax please help me understand why TE <> UE and PE <> 1 in the first query?
2) Can someone please tell me how to properly translate the first query to the new syntax so that it continues to produce the results in the first query?
Thank you very much.

How can we reproduce the issue?
Code Snippet
USE [master]
GO
EXEC sp_dbcmptlevel Northwind, 80
GO
USE [Northwind]
GO
SELECT
TE
= COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID),
UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID),
PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID)) /
CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID))
FROM
dbo
.Orders T1, dbo.Orders T2
WHERE
T1
.OrderID *= T2.OrderID
SELECT
TE
= COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID),
UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID),
PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID)) /
CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID))
FROM
dbo
.Orders T1
LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Orders T2
ON T1.OrderID = T2.OrderID
GO
EXEC sp_dbcmptlevel Northwind, 90
GO
Result:
TE
UE
PE
830
830
1.00
TE
UE
PE
830
830
1.00
As you can see, I am getting same results.
AMB

Your search did not produce any results

Hi,
I'm publishing my iWeb site to my ME.COM account.
I have the site password protected as offered in iWeb.
But when the site is password protected the search with the iWeb search field does not provide any results.
Only the message:
"Your search did not produce any results."
If I disable the password protection for the site in iWeb and republish, the search provides the expected results.
Any idea what's wrong?
Thanks and Regards,
JO

Sorry, didn't test enough.
After publishing a few new blog entries under the password protected site, I tested the search again and it does not return any results.
It was working for a short time when I republished unprotected and then again protected.
Now that I added block entries under the protected site mode, search is brogen, again.
Any Help?
Thanks and Regards,
JO

Having installed aperture 3 and imported iphoto library (15000 photos) Apertue 3 does not render most of my photos corectly most a blurred pixellated and distorted. Reverting to photo produces perfect results. Any suggestions

Having installed aperture 3 and imported iphoto library (15000 photos) Apertue 3 does not render most of my photos corectly most a blurred pixellated and distorted. Reverting to photo produces perfect results. Any suggestions

Galdaplh,
What do you mean by "reverting to photo"? "Revert" is not a function in Aperture so you must be talking about something else.
If you just performed the import of that many photos, Aperture will take some time to generate thumbnails. You can see if it is doing this sort of thing by {Command}-{Shift}-0 to show the Activity window.
Once Aperture generates all its thumbnails, you will have nearly instantaneous access to much, much better thumbnails than Aperture uses immediately after importing photos.
nathan

SQL job running DTEXEC.EXE via PowerShell step produces wrong characters in result tables. Running the same DTEXEC.EXE in PowerShell x86 window produces correct results.

I've created a package in SSDT (Visual Studio 2012) to import DBF tables into MSSQL 2014 via a wizard.
Source DBF files contain tables with Russian (Cyrillic) characters in records fields.
Created package works fine, produces correct results (imports Cyrillic characters as needed) while:
•debugging in VS2012
•deploying package in SSISDB and running the package via PowerShell x86:
&"c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\120\DTS\Binn\DTExec.exe" /Server "server\mssql2014" /ISServer "\SSISDB\import\Integration Services Project16\Package1.dtsx";
But when I create a SQL Agent job with a single PowerShell step that contains the same command and run the job it produces wrong characters in resulting tables. So, the problem is in wrong code page (or encoding). The correct tables with records are
produced and job runs without errors.
I tried
chcp 1251; # 855, 866 -- all of them
&"c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\120\DTS\Binn\DTExec.exe" /Server "server\mssql2014" /ISServer "\SSISDB\import\Integration Services Project16\Package1.dtsx";
in SQL Agent PowerShell step, but with no positive result.
Anyone encountered such a behavior? How to fix it?
v

What if you run this package without PowerShell?
Arthur My Blog

Query that only returns items that will produce a result

Thanks to Mack for his help yesterday. I would really appreciate some help from anyone who is more SQL competent than I am. I have an SQL problem that is just completely over my head. I've created a nifty tagging system for the blog, that sorts by tags and by multiple tags, check out the beta here: http://committedsardine.com/blog.cfm
When a user selects a tag, it adds it to the value list SESSION.blogTags. If the selected tag is there already, it removes it. When the list for tags pops up, I output all the tags, and show their state. You'll see what I mean if you try it.
What this leads to is the ability to select a group of tags for which there are no query results. What I want to do is only show those that will generate results and how many results they'll show. Like this, select "fluency" by itself there are 310 entries
fluency (310) | digital (234) | writing (12)
Once fluency is selected, there are 13 articles that ALSO are tagged by "digital", but none that are tagged by writing:
fluency | digital (12) | writing
I have a table called blogTagLinks, that is just for tying a tag to a blog. It lists a blogID and a tagID. Here is a sample of it for reference:
blogTagLinkID
blogID
tagID
4
2
2
5
2
3
6
2
5
39
1
18
49
1
1
42
1
9
44
1
19
47
5
14
48
1
22
54
16
22
I'm including all my sql, but the spot that I need help with is marked in red below:

<cfquery name="rsAllTags" datasource="">
SELECT tagsID, tagName
        FROM tags
        WHERE tagActive = 'y'
</cfquery>
<cfset allTags = ValueList(rsAllTags.tagsID)>
<cfif isDefined("URL.blogTags")>
    <cfif ListFind(allTags, URL.blogTags) NEQ 0>
        <cfif ListFind(SESSION.blogTags, URL.blogTags) NEQ 0>
            <cfset SESSION.blogTags = ListDeleteAt(SESSION.blogTags, ListFind(SESSION.blogTags, URL.blogTags))>
            <cfelse>
            <cfset SESSION.blogTags = ListAppend(SESSION.blogTags, URL.blogTags)>
        </cfif>
    </cfif>
</cfif>

<cfquery name="rsAvailableTags" datasource="">
SELECT tagsID, tagName
        FROM tags
        WHERE tagActive = 'y'
        NEED SOME STATEMENT HERE OF BLOGTAGLINKS TO DETERMINE WHAT TAGS WILL PRODUCE A RESULT
</cfquery>

<cfif isDefined("SESSION.sb") AND SESSION.sb EQ "tg">
    <cfquery name="rsTags" datasource="">
        SELECT tags.tagName, tagsID
        FROM tags
        WHERE tagsID <cfif SESSION.blogTags NEQ "">IN(#SESSION.blogTags#)
        <cfelse> = 0</cfif>
    </cfquery>
    <cfset variables.newrow = false>
</cfif>

<cfquery name="rsBlog" datasource="">
    SELECT blog.blogID,
        blog.storyID,
        blog.blogDate,
        blogStories.storyID,
        blogStories.blogTitle,
        SUBSTRING(blogStories.blogBody,1,200) AS blogBody,
        images.imageName
    FROM blog, blogStories, images
    WHERE blog.storyID = blogStories.storyID AND images.imageID = blog.photoID AND blog.blogDate < "#todayDate#" AND blog.deleted = 'n'
<cfif SESSION.sb EQ "kw">AND CONCAT(blogStories.blogBody, blogStories.blogTitle) LIKE '%#SESSION.blogKeywords#%'</cfif>
    <cfif SESSION.sb EQ "tg" AND SESSION.blogTags NEQ "">
            AND blog.blogID IN (
            SELECT blogID
            FROM blogTagLink
            <cfif SESSION.blogTags NEQ "">
                WHERE tagID IN(<cfqueryparam cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer" value="#SESSION.blogTags#" list="true">)
                GROUP BY blogID
                HAVING count(tagID) = #ListLen( SESSION.blogTags )#)
            </cfif>
     </cfif>
ORDER BY blog.blogDate DESC
</cfquery>

There might be a single query solution but here's a query that you
will need to run for each tag in the database (cfloop over all the
tags) and will give you the number of blogs that have the selected
tags + the current tag
SELECT Count(*) AS blog_count
FROM (
    SELECT blogID
    FROM blogTagLink
    WHERE tagID IN(<cfqueryparam cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer"
value="#SESSION.blogTags#" list="true">)
         OR tagID = #currentTagID#
    GROUP BY blogID
    HAVING count(tagID) = #ListLen( SESSION.blogTags )#
         OR count(tagID) = #ListLen( SESSION.blogTags )# + 1
    ) AS blogs
Mack

Keyboard f keys suddenly producing different results

Why have my f keys suddenly - middle of workday - started producing different results? The f11 key has changed from increasing sound volume to showing Dashboard. Also, everything I do now produces a sound effect. All my email pages now have black borders. All I have done to the system is to download new ITUNES software. Any help greatly appreciated. I am on an iMac 8.1: 10.5.5.

Go to:
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=235
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE lundi 6 octobre 2008 13:36:29)

Analog clock MC -- how to produce accurate results?

I'm using Flash 8.
I am trying to program an analog clock movieClip -- if any of
you have seen the UK game show "Countdown", it's a replica of the
Countdown clock. It's a 30-second clock and the second hand runs
from top ("12") to bottom ("6").
My first crack at this has been timeline-based. I've used a
motion tween to animate the hand moving from top to bottom. My
movie is set to run at 12fps, but it's only running at ~11.3fps.
Even though it's a slight deviation, it causes the clock to run
about 32 seconds instead of 30. Note that during the animation, the
CPU usage isn't exceeding about 4%.
I do understand that you can't depend on the Flash Player to
run at a particular framerate.
So I changed the logic behind the clock to use setInterval().
Unfortunately, even my intervals aren't firing at the exact rate
they need to. I've set the interval to 100ms, but it appears to be
firing at 110ms or so. Even changing the intervals to a higher
number (200ms, 500ms) don't produce exact results.
Any ideas or suggestions on how I can make this work?
Thanks,
Curt

When you say “DAQ express” I assume you mean DAQmx, in
LabVIEW 7.0 or later. You could go the route of trying to do precise software
timed stuff, but using WinXP you will always run into the problems that you
mentioned. Hardware timed, will always be more accurate, but setting up the
control may be a bit tricky. To program a hardware timed acquisition you can either
do it explicitly with the DAQmx functions, or you can use the DAQ assistant
(which is an Express VI). With the DAQ assistant once you drop it down it
should be pretty straight forward how to configure it, a window will pop and
you will have to fill in what you want. I would also recommend taking a look at
some of the shipping examples to get a feel for DAQmx programming without using
the DAQ assistant. You can find these examples in LabVIEW by going to: Help
Menu >> Find Example. Then from there: Hardware Input and Output >>
DAQmx >> Analog Generation. If you look at the examples that are Internally
Clocked, those will be the easiest to work with initially. Now I am not too
sure how well this will be for stage control, generally this is done either
with a motion board or if fine enough control is needed FPGA. But with those
examples, it should give you a good starting point to work from.
-GDE

Email search will produce invalid results.

a search of an email folder where the search criteria involves the body of the email will produce invalid results
Either in Webmail interface or via IMAP client (e.g. Thunderbird 1.5.x or 1.x) a search of an email folder where the search criteria involves the body of the email will produce invalid results (results set includes emails which don't match the search criteria).
e.g.
10 emails in an email folder
5 emails' body contains the phrase "fuzzy-bunny"
A search for body contains "fuzzy-bunny" will return more than just the 5 emails.
EMAIL SERVER VERSION:
iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.09 (built Nov 18 2005)
libimta.so 5.2 HotFix 2.09 (built 10:35:58, Nov 18 2005)
As anyone seen this before. Possibly a fix in later Hotfixes?
Thanks in advance.

Indeed, this is a known issue.
Fixed in hotfix 2.11. You will want to contact support for the current hotfix.
Though, I would strongly suggest that you be in the planning stage for upgrade to 6.3. 5.2 is due for End Of Support Life, very soon.

@DatePart formula produces constant result

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for