DC pension not calculating at 10% of the Pensionable earnings.

Users,
Part of the reason we made the changes to /171 was so that we could setup DC pension that would calculate automatically. We setup the WT 7310 effective September 1st, but the Pension is not calculating at 10% of the Pensionable earnings.  It looks almost like it is taking out the COLA rate is this possible?

More info please. Where is this percentage defined at config level and  do you use Savings Plans  (0169) IT? More info on the config.

Similar Messages

  • Pension not calculated when EE is hired mid-month

    Hi All
    Please suggest for the following....
    When an Employee is hired in the middle of the month, the system doesn't calculate Pension Contribution.
    Like if an EE is hired on 10th April. The system will calculate all payments & deductions, but it is not calculating the Pension Contributions.
    I am maintaining IT 169, 171 for Pension Contribution.
    The problem I found behind this is.....(WIth the help of an ABAPer)
    -: System checks the Payroll Period Start Date with the Org. Assignment start date. When it doesnu2019t match, the system does not calculate the Pension Contribution.
    For the time being I solved this through the following action -: In debugging, I canceled this condition (skipped this check). Then it calculated the Pension Contribution.
    But, this is not the right solution for achieving that as we are changing standard SAP coding.
    Please suggest any solution for the same.
    Thanks & Regards

    If your schema has p0169 with BEG that will happen, try put below Param1 which fits your requirement.
    BEG                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period begin date.        
    No changes within the current payroll period are taken into             
    consideration.                                                          
    No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record ends      
    within the current payroll period.                                                                               
    END                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period end date.          
    No changes within the current payroll period are taken into             
    consideration.                                                          
    No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record begins    
    within the current payroll period.                                                                               
    CHK                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll check date (the pay date),
    regardless of whether the check date falls into the payroll period      
    itself.                                                                 
    A record whose validity starts after the end date of the current payroll
    period is still evaluated if the check date (which lies in the future)  
    falls within the validity period of the infotype.                                                                               
    FRST                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan     
    infotype and payroll period. The first intersection is taken to         
    determine the full period deduction amount which is stored without      
    proration.                                                                               
    LAST                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan     
    infotype and payroll period. The last intersection is taken to determine
    the full period deduction amount which is stored without proration.

  • System not calculating as mentioned in the price differentials multipliers

    Dear Folks,
    We are using contingent worker functionality in R12.1.3.
    1) For example,we have a PO with line type as rated based temporary labour, UOM as "HR" , unit price as 100 and total amount is 100000.
    2) Mentioned multipliers in PO for price differentials as Holiday as 2 and Overtime as 1.5.
    3) In general working hours in a day is 8 hrs.The calendar defined in the system with Mon-Fri as working days.
    4) Timecard entered in OTL with Sunday as '8' hrs, Monday as '10' hrs.
    5) Whereas system need to calculate as for Sunday 8hrs=>8*100*2=1600 and for Monday =>10hrs=(8*100)+2*100*1.5=1100 in total need to show as 2700.
    6) And those time card details interfaced from OTL to purchasing and it shows as received with an amount of 1800 as received in the PO shipments under more tab.
    System does not calculated as per mentioned price differential multipliers.
    Am i missing any setup?
    Any help will be highly appreciated
    Regards,
    Sri.

    Please someone help...I am stuck on this at some place or the other and now finally at this place when I thought that everything is well:(

  • Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

    Hi,
    We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
    Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
    Thanks in Advance,
    Dharmveer

    Hi,
    We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
    Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
    Thanks,
    Dharmveer

  • Flash Quiz not calculating totals correctly at the end

    Hi,
    I am working on a Flash XML quiz, that can be found on this
    tutorial
    http://www.permadi.com/tutorial/flashMXQuiz/index3.html
    I have it just about working except at the end on the summary
    screen, the application is supposed to calculate the number right,
    the number wrong and the percentage.
    I am not sure what I have missed, but I zipped up the .fla
    file and the xml file and wanted to see if someone could take a
    look. I know the problem isn't with the XML file so it must be in
    the AS towards the end in the summary screen section.
    here is the path the download the zip
    http://www.inspired-evolution.com/Quiz.zip

    the XML file is only storing the questions. For the scoring
    calculations I am using three dynamic text boxes with var values of
    numOfQuestionsAnsweredCorrectly,numOfQuestionsAnsweredCorrectly,
    numOfQuestionsAnsweredIncorrectly
    and in the AS I am using
    userScore=(numOfQuestionsAnsweredCorrectly*100)/
    (numOfQuestionsAnsweredIncorrectly+numOfQuestionsAnsweredCorrectly)
    I am following the tutorial to a Tee, so unless there is a
    typo or errors w/ the tutorial this should be working.

  • Error in  tax calculation It is giving the Error A currenc yis not defined

    While posting invoice using f-43  Tax on sales and purchases r not calculated
    It is giving the Error A currency is not defined for country
    pls send reply top my mail id
    [email protected]
    Thanks,
    Thiyagarajan

    Normally Planned delivery costs are known at the time of the PO, hence they are loaded to the value of Inventory.
    Unplanned Costs are not planned, that is the reason they cant be loaded to the Inventory, becuase we dont know the costs at the time of GR, these costs needs to be written off. But since Purchase order doesnot have a cost object associated with it. It throws this error.
    We tackle this by configuring OKB9 for this GL Account/Cost element with a cost object.
    Edited by: Suraj Ramamurthy on Nov 19, 2008 6:32 PM

  • SQL query not calculating

    SQL query not calculating
    gross_amount is giving the value of extended_amount and the gross_price_rc is giving the value of unit_selling_price
    select customer_trx_line_id,
    ( extended_amount / 1- (decode(decode(attribute6,null,0)+decode(attribute7,null,0)+decode(attribute8,null,0)+decode(attribute9,null,0)/100,null,0,1,0))) GROSS_AMOUNT,
    ( unit_selling_price /1-(decode(decode(attribute6,null,0)+decode(attribute7,null,0)+decode(attribute8,null,0)+decode(attribute9,null,0)/100,null,0,1,0))) gross_price_rc
    from ra_customer_trx_lines_all
    where attribute6 is not null or attribute7 is not null or attribute8 is not null or attribute9 is not null
    whats the isuue here??
    Thanks

    decode(attribute7,null,0)Looking at it again, this always returns 0 or NULL, so it not really surprising
    DECODE
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/functions040.htm#i1017437
    CASE
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/expressions004.htm#i1033392

  • Invoice Days are not calculating when a Days limit exists.

    Hello,
    We are having an issue with both our Customer and Vendor invoices.
    When using a 'payment term' with a 'Days limit' the Due date is not calculating at all.  The 'Days' field in the 'Payment tab' just comes up as a blank.
    This functionality used to work, something must have changed in the system.
    This is how I have the Payment term setup.
    ZY87 (days limit 10).  120 days invoice date (10th & 25th)
    Default for Baseline Date = Document Date
    Fixed Date = 10, Additional months = 4
    ZY87 (days limit 25)  120 days invoice date (10th & 25th)
    Default for Baseline date = Document Date
    Fixed Date = 25, Additional months = 4.
    When I choose this payment term in the invoice, I get no value to show up in the 'Days' box and when I save it, the Due date becomes the Baseline Date.
    Any idea why?
    thanks for your help!
    Brett

    Thanks for your immediate response.
    i have maintained all the ticks for the counting rule for LOP absence type. but in the infotype it still shows 22 days instead of 31 days for the month of oct.
    Regards,
    MVN

  • F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating

    Dear Gurus,
    For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
    But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
    My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
    Regards
    Prabin

    You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ?  Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ?  This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run.  Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ?  With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.

  • IT0071 Dynamic Action does not overwrite Pension Scheme Calculation Rule

    I am trying to write a dynamic action to create IT0071 with default values for the Employee contribution (0%) and Employer contribution (4%). However when IT0071 is created the default values from the associated Pension Scheme Calculation Rule (4% and 8%) are not being overwritten by the dynamic action. Is there a way to get the dynamic action to override the Pension Scheme Calculation Rule values?
    This is the dynamic action u2026
    0171              BENGR     06     10     P     T001P-MOLGA='08'
    0171              BENGR     06     15     P     PSPAR-MASSN='01'/X
    0171              BENGR     06     20     P     PSPAR-MASSN='12'/X
    0171              BENGR     06     25     P     P0171-BENGR<>NOBN
    0171              BENGR     06     30     P     P0171-BSTAT<>NOBN
    0171              BENGR     06     300     I     INS,0071,SS7,,(P0171-BEGDA),(P0171-ENDDA)
    0171              BENGR     06     315     W     P0071-PCTEE='0.0000'
    0171              BENGR     06     320     W     P0071-PCTER='4.0000'
    Any help much appreciated.
    Regards,
    Janet

    Hi Brian,
                  In standard SAP physical sample planning requires sample drawing procedure.
    Link: [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/2d/3521b6448c11d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
                  And drawing procedure is advised with partial sample numbers.
    Link: [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/2d/3521b6448c11d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
                 Generally when we use partial sample numbers, we also use a drawing procedure. And in that scenario SAP describes the calculation as shown in
    Link: [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/2d/3521b6448c11d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
                 What you have done (partial samples for MICs and not having for others, all without drawing procedure) is not generally done. I think our observations in this context should be confirmed only if we try more of such examples.
    Regards
    Sm.

  • SSRS 2008 Column Chart with Calculated Series (moving average) "formula error - there are not enough data points for the period" error

    I have a simple column chart grouping on 1 value on the category axis.  For simplicity's sake, we are plotting $ amounts grouping by Month on the category axis.  I right click on the data series and choose "Add calculated series...".  I choose moving average.  I want to move the average over at least 2 periods.
    When I run the report, I get the error "Formula error - there are not enough data points for the period".  The way the report is, I never have a guaranteed number of categories (there could be one or there could be 5).  When there is 2 or more, the chart renders fine, however, when there is only 1 value, instead of suppressing the moving average line, I get that error and the chart shows nothing.
    I don't think this is entirely acceptable for our end users.  At a minimum, I would think the moving average line would be suppressed instead of hiding the entire chart.  Does anyone know of any workarounds or do I have to enter another ms. connect bug/design consideration.
    Thank you,
    Dan

    I was having the same error while trying to plot a moving average across 7 days. The work around I found was rather simple.
    If you right click your report in the solution explorer and select "View Code" it will give you the underlying XML of the report. Find the entry for the value of your calculated series and enter a formula to dynamically create your periods.
    <ChartFormulaParameter Name="Period">
                      <Value>=IIf(Count(Fields!Calls.Value) >= 7 ,7, (Count(Fields!Calls.Value)))</Value>
    </ChartFormulaParameter>
    What I'm doing here is getting the row count of records returned in the chart. If the returned rows are greater than or equal to 7 (The amount of days I want the average) it will set the points to 7. If not, it will set the number to the amount of returned rows. So far this has worked great. I'm probably going to add more code to handle no records returned although in my case that shouldn't happen but, you never know.
    A side note:
    If you open the calculated series properties in the designer, you will notice the number of periods is set to "0". If you change this it will overwrite your custom formula in the XML.

  • There is something wrong with the volumes buttons in my macbook pro, every time i pressed the one who raises the volume, it leads me to the screen where (i do not no what its called) the background is black with the date and time and a calculator.

    There is something wrong with the volumes buttons in my macbook pro, every time i pressed the one who raises the volume, it leads me to the screen where (i do not no what its called) the background is black with the date and time and a calculator. However, when i lower it, my safari tab goes out of the screen. What do you guys think i should do? I'm getting very nervous.

    hey HAbrakian!
    You may want to try using the information in this article to adjust the behavior of your function keys to see if that resolves the behavior:
    Mac OS X: How to change the behavior of function keys
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3399
    Take care, and thanks for visiting the Apple Support Communities.
    -Braden

  • Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

    Hi Experts,
    We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
    Eg
    Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
    His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
    His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
    For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
    Please provide with your valuable inputs.
    Thanks in Advance
    Koutilya

    Hi,
    Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
    Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
    Annual Regular income is computed as under:
    Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
    Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
    VK

  • Bank charges is not calculating at the time of payment to vendor by APP

    hi experts,
    In APP the paying company is paying to the vendor.Now they want to issue a DD (Demand Draft) to the vendor where a bank charges is involved.
    I have already customized the CHRGES/EXPENSES in Bank Determination Tab (transaction Code FBZP) to the corresponding Bank Subledger(outgoing) and also the Charge Indicator to the corressponding House Bank.
    the transaction key BSP is already assigned with the ledger(Bank Charges)
    I have already checked the Field status variant, it is ok
    But , that system is not calculating the bank charges as it is configured in the system at the time of payment through APP when a full MM invoice verification cycle is running
    Can anybody help me out?
    With regards,
    Sudipto Paul

    You have to select update profile, which works with payment budget. Secondly, you have to define the settings for payment transfer in OF29 transaction. You should consult the following notes, in order to secure smooth payment transfer procedure:
    For online update:
    Note 1695556 - Main features of Customizing for onilne payment update
    Note 882379 - FMPU_R: Recommendations for the online payment update
    In general:
    Note 400924 - Recommendations and rules for the payment transfer in FM
    Note 1466979 - FM Financial transactions to be used in FI line items

  • Cess on TDS is not calculating at the time of posting F-47

    Dear All,
    Cess on TDS is not calculating at the time of F-47 (vendor Down payment Requst)
    Mean system is deducting TDS amount only, not deducting Cess amount on TDS . at the time invoice posting Cess & TDS calculating in this company code (1111)
                But in other (2222) companycode,system calculating cess on TDS at the time F-47 . both company codes under the same system. if we apply perticular notes on above issue is there any affect to other (2222)company code settings ?
    Plse give me advise urgant.
    Raja

    Hi
    In the withholding tax settings Define Withholding Tax Type for Invoice Posting
    and Define Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting for CESS ,check whether you selected in <b>calculation part</b>: tax amount as base for calculation and selected inherit base.
    If this is not done system will not calculate the Cess.
    Regards
    Aravind
    Assign points if useful

Maybe you are looking for