F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating
Dear Gurus,
For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
Regards
Prabin
You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ? Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ? This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run. Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ? With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.
Similar Messages
-
Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43
Hi,
Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
Checks done :
1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
3.Base amounts checked.
4. Formula for WHT checked
5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
Thanks in advanceShankar,
Thanks for reply.
If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E SP 22 to 4.7 E SP30.
My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
If any suitable answer appreciatable.
Thanks once again for your reply. -
Extended Withholding Tax not calculating
Hi
We are in ECC 6. In development system, we configured Extended Withhoding Tax for India and tested Vendor Invoice FB60. It works perfectly without any problem. It post separate line item for withholding tax as well.
We moved the configuration to Test system, where it is not working at all. All settings are as similar as development system. Vendor master record also similar as development. The document entered for testing is same as development.
Why it is not calculating Withholding tax in Test system? Is it any thing is to be done manually (like activation), table update.. in client independently?
You suggestion is most impartant.
Thanks
VenkatDear Venkatasubramanya,
Check the following Master data in your Test System......
1. Vendor Master Data: Check in Withholding tax tab, whether liable tick is activated or not for your Tax Codes
2. Whether your Withholding tax types are oayment type or invoice type
check in GL Master (Vendor Reco Account), Field Status Group, Whether Withholding tax fields are optional or not.
Best Regards -
Withholding Taxes not calculating
Hi All,
Currently we are using ECC 6.0.
While creating Vendor we are assigning With Holding Tax codes and I created a BP with this Vendor.
Now I created a Lease-In Contract for this BP, but system asking tax types and tax group is mandetory under Posting Parameters tab, but those tax types are belongs to Sales and Purchase tax codes.
So I am unable to do with holding tax calculations and I tried Field status for for Tax types and tax group I did't find.
Please advice me how I can achive this and is there any configuration settings to do with holding tax.
Regards,
CM.Hi,
While assigning withholding tax code in vendor master for payment postings we should only update the withholding tax type. We must not update the withholding tax code. The reason being system always automatically calculate taxes even in the case of final payment.
You can use report RFWT0010 to adjust the withholding tax information to the relevant withholding tax types. Hope this helps.
Thanks
Neel -
Withhold taxes not withheld - F110 Program
Hi SCN members,
When the users performed the F110 program and generated the txt file to the bank (That is who print the bank slip.), the bank noticed that the gross amount was printed in the bank slip without subtract the taxes.
These documents were generated from billing process VF04.
Apparently, the issue is in the billing documents and not in F110 process because with the user, we have reversed a payment of one document and we have tried to pay it on F110. The result was the same.
All taxes are not been subtract and not only the taxes withheld in F110. The IRRF tax is withheld in billing process and also is not been subtract.
I’ve never seen something like that. Have you seen?
Thanks so much!Hi ,
have you configured Withholding tax on Payment .
System deduct the withholding tax In f110 when you configure Withholding tax type for payment and assign to you comapny code . and then Mainatin in Vendor/ customer master.
Please check the setting and let us know . -
Withholding taxes not updated when program run in background
Hi,
in a z1 report i do:
SUBMIT z2
VIA JOB lc_jobname
NUMBER v_jobcount
WITH p_fecha = p_fecha
WITH p_file = v_file_in
WITH p_e_file = p_efile
WITH p_client = p_client
WITH p_test = p_test
AND RETURN.
within this z2 report i do:
PERFORM mrm_invoice_create_call(saplmrm_bapi) USING s_rbkpv
tab_frseg[]
tab_co[]
tab_ma[]
c_rbstat_posted
space
CHANGING invoicedocnumber
fiscalyear
return[]
f_subrc.
IF test IS INITIAL.
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
ELSE.
ROLLBACK WORK.
ENDIF.
the question is that if i run z1 report online there is no problem but if
i run z1 report in background, withholding taxes are not calculated.
After debugging this is what i´ve found out:
1.- in PERFORM mrm_invoice_create_call(saplmrm_bapi) there is a call to fm FI_WT_POST IN UPDATE TASK
2.- in FI_WT_POST table WITH_ITEM is updated
i guess this could be due to a delay in updating the table so i´m considering doing a WAIT UP TO X SECONDS.
why is it working in online mode but not in background mode?
any idea?
Best regards.Hi,
in case someone is interested this is how i solved the question:
i had badi MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDAT implemented.
in this badi implementation i had this code (among other checks too):
CHECK sy-tcode = 'MIR4' OR sy-tcode = 'MIR7'.
this code avoided the background job case.
It seems that In a background job sy-tcode is empty.
so i just needed to add this:
CHECK sy-tcode = 'MIR4' OR sy-tcode = 'MIR7' OR sy-batch = 'X'.
and then withholding taxes reappeared again.
(so sad, so true... one day of debugging, sigh)
Best regards.
Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Feb 2, 2012 4:53 PM -
F110 - Withholding taxes - Bill of Exchange Payments
Hello Gurus,
I have a problem implementing Bill of Exchange Payments, we are creating bill of exchange before due date because we are using a confirming service with our bank. When we make a payment run, the system post the bills of exchange for the invoices that are gonna due, thats fine, but the problem is the system also post withholding tax at this time, so it its not right at all because we are not paying the invoices, the payment day is when we clear the bill of exchange at due date and we transfer the real money to the bank. So we could solve this problem if there is a way to post different dates in the same run of payment, if we could post each bill of exchange on due date would be perfect.
I have been looking for a way to change de post date in F110 or another solution, but i dont get anything yet.
Thanks in advance for your answers.Dear Jehade,
yes, please be kindly informed that special G/L transactions such as down
payment and bills of exchange are not supported for one-time accounts.
Please read the SAP note 19638. This functionality that you require is
not available in the system. As the note states, the only way is to
define your customer as a regular customer to enable the functionality.
I hope this helps.
Mauri -
WH Tax not calculating after Config
Hi Guys,
I have configure the WH tax for my company code. I defined the Tax types and tax codes and assigned it to my company code.
Then i assigned the same tax code in my vendor master and also activated the extended WH tax functionality for my company code.
However, when i raise an invoice using FB60 the system does not pop up the with holding tax button. Nor does it show the Withholding tax amounts.
Is there any config missing here?
Thanks
Kris..Hi
Please see if you have followed all the below config steps
1.Check W.Tax Countries
2. Define Official Witholding Tax Codes
3. Define Business Place (If more than one TAN No.)
4. Assign factory calendar to Business Place
5.Define W.Tax type for Invoice Posting and Payment Posting
6. Define W.Tax Code for Invoice Posting and Payment Posting
7.Check Receipiant Types
8. Maintain Tax due dates
9. Maintain surcharge calculation method
10.Maintain Surcharge rates
11.Assign tax types to company code
12. Create GL Account - Withholding tax
13. Assingment of GL Account to Withhold tax
14. Maintain Document types for challan updatation
15.Maintain Number ranges group (SAP script forms)
16.Assign Number ranges to number group
17. Maintain number ranges
18. Assign TDS Number in Global Parameters
19. Assign Tax codes in Vendor Master -
Withholding tax not able to view in FBL1N - Vendor Line Item report
Dear All,
The VI documents are posted in different vendors. The Tax code has been duly selected and tax was deducted at the time of posting the entry. When we generate the list of vendor line items using standard report FBL1N, we observe that only some of the VI documents in the output show the withholding tax amount in the respective column whereas in some of the VI documents, the withholding tax amount is appearing as zero even though the tax line item is available in the document (same can be seen in FB03).
Please let us know the possible cause for the same.
Regards,
Anand.InguvaDear,
by FBL1N is not possible to check the Extended WT
information due to the technical reasons explained into the note
number 363309.
Furthermore please be aware that by the report RFKQST00 and
RFIDYYWT You can have all the WT details.
I hope this helps You.
Mauri -
HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj SainiHi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards -
Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay
Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
KoutilyaHi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK -
Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO
Dear All,
I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Pawan SardaHello
Thanks for ur Reply.
MIRO -- Subsequent Debit -
>Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
>PO NO. -
> change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
> Amount 4000 INR -
> also change Tax Code of Line Item -
>Simulate
Vendor A\c -
> 4,348.18 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
> 338.04 INR Dr
ECS -
> 6.76 INR Dr
HECS -
> 3.38 INR Dr
Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
Actual Entry
Vendor A\c -
> 4,412.00 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
> 400.00 INR Dr
ECS -
> 8.00 INR Dr
HECS -
> 4.00 INR Dr
Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM -
Withholding tax not captured for a single Vendor during Invoice
Dear SAP Gurus,
Withholding tax is not captured during MIRO for a particular Vendor. The Vendor Master has been assigned with the relative tax codes. Program RFWT0010 has been run. Tax Types have been
checked. Error message was changed to Warning in OBA5. Message 7Q321 Withholding tax
amount exceeds amount in Vendor line item 001. Relative SAP notes referred. Withholding tax
type at the time of payment Central Invoice & I ppmt checked. OBC4 reconciliation account
G067 field status group checked for taxes - optional. Please give solution.
Thanks and regards,
SadashivanHi,
Check with the minimum amount of the withholding tax code.
Check accumulation activated or not.
If you are using portary dependencies check the base withholding tax code given.
While defining the withholding tax code check the posting indicator and check withholding tax formula is activated or not. if it is active then check the amount given in withholding tax code formulas.
Still problem continue revert back.
Regards,
Sankar -
Withholding tax not displayed in FBL1N
Dear All,
1.Can anyone do help for the displaying the wihtholding tax field in the Vendor Line Item Display.
2. How to write fi report for displaying withholding tax field in Vendor line item display.
Regards,
Harinath.KDear,
yes, it is not possible to select data from table WITH_ITEM
within the transaction FBL1N in a transparent and unique way.
With the extended WT functionality SAP decided to create a new table WITH_ITEM to store the WT data that cannot be reached by FBL1N. Table BSEG contains Classical WT data only.
And as note 363309 says:
"Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
from your display variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'."
I hope this can help You.
Mauri -
Withholding tax not considered on clearing
Hi dear SAP colleagues,
Problem:
SAP does not retain the value related to withholding tax
In this scenario, withholding taxes are charged on values since 7.000
Company acquired equipment for 14.000 and in may 17 posted and advance of 13.000.
In june when executing clearing through (F-44):
A) Advance 13000 (effective date May 17)
B) Payment value 14.000 (effective date June 16)
Thank you
Edited by: Naej on Jul 12, 2010 9:27 PM
Edited by: Naej on Jul 12, 2010 9:29 PMHi Marssel!
In master data it is checked. But in invoice the amount of withholding was NOT retained... (There appears the Code an Base amount only).
How can I corrrect it?
Thank you,
Naej
Edited by: Naej on Jul 12, 2010 10:05 PM
Edited by: Naej on Jul 12, 2010 10:10 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
My Magsafe has been working for almost a year now, but all of a sudden, it stopped working a few days ago. I've been trying to use different AC plugins like the "Duck head" and the long cord one that I don't know what the name is to. As I said in the
-
Rescue and Recovery's disk management is pathetic and senseless, please help.
I'm using an X61 (which i've been very happy with, by the way, not that this is relevant) which has Rescue and Recovery installed by default. This is okay, as I see the value of regular backups. However, the default setting is to keep a history of 5
-
Hi all, We enter KMAT and configuration values in SD order. In order to have our BOM exploded according to configuration in Production order, we need to go CU51 and save the configuration. The question is, CU51 is really necessary for activating conf
-
Hi Everyone, My macbook 13" 5,5 hard drive recently went out, and it would freeze and give me the wheel everytime i use it for more than 15 minutes. I went out and bought a samsung SSD and replaced it. When it came to installing the OS, I didn't have
-
How can I find the Mac app store if there is one?
I have one Apple ID. When I enter my Apple ID on my Mac I can only access apps for my ipad and iphone but not my Mac. Is there a mac app store?