Defaulting Cost accounting distribution line at Responsibility level

Hi Project Accounting Experts,
I have now rephrased the query:
PRC: Distribute Usage and Miscellaneous Costs need to default one of the segment values based on the responsibility that created the misc transaction for the expenditiure batch
Below is the Auto accounting rule created and assigned to the Misc Trx for All Misc Transactions as Function transaction:
select decode(upper(ttt.service_type_code),'IGJ',
fnd_profile.value( 'IJ_BiZ')) from
pa_projects_all JT,
pa_project_types_all ttt
where ttt.project_type = JT.project_type
and JT.project_id = :1
The profile option ' J_BiZ'(created for GL module) and is meant to default a segment value for Miscellaneous Expenditure transactions at responsibility level. but rather profile ' J_BiZ' defaults at the site level . Why?.
I need the segment value to default based on the Profile option at Responsibility level for the miscellaneous tranasaction created via that responsibility.
Does anyone has an idea?
Edited by: 198196 on 02-Jan-2013 08:11

Hi Parakala,
Maintain Cost centre at each Organization unit at infotype 1008.
at PR05 it will pick by default.
Let me know if you need more information.
with regards,
Gopala

Similar Messages

Maintain Default cost element in Controlling area - FI660

Dear All,
We have implemented PS module for some company codes and hadn't implemented for others, when we are trying ot create a downpayment requrest its asking for default cost element assignment.
We would like to know wheather this default cost element assignment at controlling area level will impact all the company codes or will it be applicable only to those company codes which are useing PS module.
Please explain the detailed process flow if possilble.
Thanks & Regards

Hi
It will not affect all company codes . Revenue will be generated for a particular company code for which you have created a project.
SHASHANK

IPM - Account Distribution Task

Hi,
I have a task pending with Account Distribution.I logged into IPM Tasks List screen and clicked on "View Task" link.I see that the account distributions/lines are non-editable..My intention is the distribution form should be editable so that user/group should be able to add the Accounting Segments. What is the setting required to accomplish this?
Thanks,
Lakshmi

Hi Lakshmi,
Check if this issue is not related to rights.
Regards,
Vikrant Korde.

Regarding po error:buiding default account distribution and please wait....

hi ,
i 'll appreciate if any one can help me in this:
we have applied patches to our system here OAPPS 11.03,after this whenever i go to create purchase orders or requisitions ..shipment and then distribution ,i am getting error that "BUILDING DEFAULT ACCOUNT DISTRIBUTION AND PLEASE WAIT..." but i don't get values for charge,budget,accrual and variance accounts on distribution screen.i checked the wfstatus.sql(account generator workflow file) and run that by giving item_key and item_type for PO,i didn't get any output i.e no rows selected for every activities.Then i used trace on and read the trace file in which i saw one error ORA:00936 which means missing exp(i think) and one wrong sql statement is appearing in trace file.it has comma before from clause..i am not able to understand why is it happening?if any one knows about this then please let me know...is it workflow problem or something else?
thanks in anticipation

Muthu,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Please find below the example:
PO item qty - 100
Cost distribution:
Line 1 - 50
Line 2 - 30
Line 3 - 20
Now the PO has been ordered. PO in backend is showing three account assignments.
After that, I have deleted the fiirst 2 account assignments (1 & 2).
Now the PO will show like:
PO item qty - 100
Cost distribution:
Line 1 - 50 (deleted)
Line 2 - 30 (deleted)
Line 3 - 20
Now the Po item qty and account assignment qty are not same. In this it should give an error. But I am still able to order the PO. When the PO has been transfered to backend, I could see only one account assignment in ME23N but the PO item qty is showing there. Because of that I could able to process confirmation and invoice.
Now, if I change the qty of this specific item, then the new qty is getting updated in teh account assignment tab against the third item.
Rather, if I try to add another item to the PO, then at that time it is giving the error messasge: Sum of quantities > xxx < sum of total quantities.
Till invoice has been posted, it is not giving the error message.
Thanks,
SS

PO: Error while entering Charge account in Distributions line

Hi All,
We are getting below error while creating Requisition,
+++++++++++++++++++
APP-PO-14082: A PO Charge Account is mandatory and could not be determined.
Review your account generator setup.
+++++++++++++++++++
We are getting this error after I click in Distributions line and Charge Account Field.
Please suggest where in the setup we should check for Account Generator Setup.
Thanks

Hi,
I think no need to change any thing in Account Generator, in ideal case if you setup for INV,PO and AP is complete then it picks the PO Charge Account by default. for more detail please email at [email protected]
TC

PO with hundreds of multiple account assignment lines on service line level

Hi, experts,
I want to create a external service PO with multiple account assignment.
However, in the service line item level, when I click on the multiple account assignment, I could only enter 97 lines. But I need to create around 1000 account assignment lines for a single service line.
Is it possible to extend the no. of account assignment lines inside the service line level? May I know how to do so?
Thanks & regards,
James

I'm facing a similar error.
What I think it's happening is that for technical reasons the program involved only delivers 99 line items... To make things worse, When you try to create an invoice for that full item you are going to get an error bc the invoice reserves line 99 for unplanned account assignments.
The suggestion from SAP is to create further items with 98 account assignment items or less.
Have a look at these notes: 486808, 651784
Regards,
Nelson
PS: Please rewards points for helpful answers

Default GL account (cost element) for external service contracts

Hi everybody,
question about GL being defaulted from contract for external services
The requirement is to have GL (cost element) being defined per service sub item defaulting to work order. Account assignment is unknown, because the costs might be settled later to cost center or AFE or else.
You could default cost element either through material group (which doesn't enable cost element to contract) or with account assignment category 'K' or 'F' which do not suit, cause the former requires cost center, that is unknown yet, whereas the latter requires assignment to order which doesn't make sense at all. Theoretically, it could be done with acc assignment cat 'U' , but cost element is not enabled with that category..
I was assuming that cost center which you are required to enter along with cost element while creating service sub item referring to some sort of internal accounting. The system also requires service sub item acc assignment category being aligned with requisition (which is 'F') and would in fact create PR referrencing actual work order number. But still, doesn't it make sense having contract referencing another order.. Also, we don't use default values for PM ext operation data.
So, the question is how to accomplish the requirement with Unknown assignment category? what is the point of defining cost center in the contract in given circumstances? Is there any work around exists?
Thanks in advance
Sergey

Hi,
Try this: IMG -> Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Processing -> Maintenance and Service Orders -> Functions and Settings for Order Types -> Create Default Value Profiles for External Procurement.
After that assign it to order type: Default Values for Task List Data and Profile Assignments.
Regards,
Rogério Reis

How to assign default cost center and G/L account in Purchase requisition

Hi,
While creating the purchase requisition ME51N in account assignment we have to enetr cost center name and G/L account but every time we have to enter this how to assign this as defaut value , like cost center : MSMISC and account 42XXXXX.
REGARDS,
ZAFAR

hi
if the field is required then u have to enter them manually
so if this are not required then goto OKB9 here give the default cost center for the Gl acct

Can a cost distribution line have multiple invoice distributions?

I have a functional question. Is is possible to have multiple invoice distribution for a single cost distribution line?
I mean, if we join PA.PA_COST_DISTRIBUTION_LINES_ALL AND AP.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL, will we get multiple invoice distributin lines for a cost distribution line.
Thanks,
Upendra

Hi,
It is technically not possible for one CDL to map to multiple invoice distributions. In 11i the joins are: cdl.system_referece2 = apd.invoice_id, and cdl.system_reference_3 = apd.distribution_line_num, and a combination of (invoice_id, distributioncd_line_number) would always give you only one AP Invoice distribution. In R12, the mapping is EI.document_header_id = APD.invoice_distribution_id and one invoice_distribution_id can point to only one AP Invoice Distribution.
Multiple CDLs for a single AP Invoice Distribution: Yes, this is possible.
1. When an AP Invoice distribution is imported into Projects and adjustments are carried out in Projects for the imported line and then the PRC: Distribute Supplier Adjustments process, then at this point of time multilple CDLs map to a particular AP distribution. Now, when PRC: Interface Supplier Adjustments to Payables is run, the adjusted transactions create new AP distributions.
2. For a CDL, there can be 'C' and 'D' lines, which would carry the same attributes as the 'R' line, hence we can say there are multiple CDLs for a single AP distribution.
Thanks,
Prabhjeet

Defaulting Expense Template on Responsibility Level

Hi All,
I am trying to use personalization to default expense templates at the responsibility level in iExpense, but it doesn't seem to be working. I typed the expense template name in the Initial Value field of the messageChoice item for Expense Template, but this does not default to the appropriate template even after apache is bounced. The expense template defaults to the original expense template that was there and does not default to the new template that we added. I've tried this at the site and responsibility levels but neither seem to work.
Is there a way of doing this through personalization or does it require extension?
Thank you.

Hi,
Actually Defaulting on OA Framework also has a Hierarchy.
Hierarchy is:
Highest level Level 1 : Default(or initial value) values through Controller
Level 2 : Default(or initial value) values through Personalizations.
level 3 : Default(or initial value) values through initial value property at design time.
level 4 : Default(or initial value) values through View Object
Lowest level Level 5 : Default(or initial value) values through Entity Object create method.
Refer to this link : http://oracle.anilpassi.com/defaults-in-oa-framework-concepts-and-practical-approach-2.html
In your case i think the Default is done through Controller thats why it is not getting overridden through personalizations.
In this case you need to extend the controller.
Thanks,
Gaurav

General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items 0FIGL_O14 Performace issue

Dear Forum,
We are facing a performance issue while loading the data to 0FIGL_O14 General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items from CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
Please see my requirement below for updating the data to 0FIGL_O14 DSO.
This report is generated to display Dry Dock and Running Repair expenses for the particular Purchase orders with respective G/L's.
1) The G/L DSO will provide us the 0DEBIT_LC and    0DEB_CRE_DC Foreign currency amount with signs (+/-) amounts and.
2) ZMMPRC01 Cube   will provide us the 0ORDER_VALUE (Purchse order value)and    0INVCD_AMNT Invoice amount.
While we are loading the data from CUBE ZMMPRC01 -> ODSO 0FIGL_O14 DSO ,we have created nearly 19 InfoObject level routine to derive the below mentioned fields data for MM Purchase Order related records.
0CHRT_ACCTS    Chart of accounts
0ITEM_NUM      Number of line item within accounting documen
0AC_DOC_NO     Accounting document number
0GL_ACCOUNT    G/L Account
0COMP_CODE     Company code
0COSTCENTER    Cost Center
0CO_AREA       Controlling area
0COSTELMNT     Cost Element
0SEGMENT       Segment for Segmental Reporting
0BUS_AREA      Business area
0FUNC_AREA     Functional area
0AC_DOC_NR     Document Number (General Ledger View)
0AC_DOC_TYP    Document type
0POST_KEY      Posting key
0PSTNG_DATE    Posting date in the document
0DOC_CURRCY    Document currency
0LOC_CURTP2    Currency Type of Second Local Currency
0CALQUART1     Quarter
0CALYEAR       Calendar year
For reference Please see the below logic to derive the data for PO related record.
DATA:
      MONITOR_REC    TYPE rsmonitor.
$$ begin of routine - insert your code only below this line        -
    ... "insert your code here
    types : begin of ty_FIGL,
                CHRT_ACCTS type /BI0/OICHRT_ACCTS,
                ITEM_NUM type /BI0/OIITEM_NUM,
                AC_DOC_NO type /BI0/OIAC_DOC_NO,
                GL_ACCOUNT type /BI0/OIGL_ACCOUNT,
            end of ty_FIGL.
    data :it_figl type STANDARD TABLE OF ty_figl,
          wa_figl type ty_figl.
    SELECT single CHRT_ACCTS
                    ITEM_NUM
                    AC_DOC_NO
                    GL_ACCOUNT from /BI0/AFIGL_O1400
                      into wa_figl
                      where DOC_NUM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_NUM and
                            DOC_ITEM = SOURCE_FIELDS-DOC_ITEM and
                            /BIC/Z_PCODE = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_PCODE
                            and
                            /BIC/Z_VOY_NO = SOURCE_FIELDS-/BIC/Z_VOY_NO
                            and
                            FISCYEAR = SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCYEAR.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      RESULT = wa_figl-AC_DOC_NO.
    ENDIF.
    clear wa_figl.
Please note the same kind of logic is applied for all the above mentioned fields.
Here is my concerns and issue.
For the all above all routines i am referring BI0/AFIGL_O1400
DSO and finally loading to the Same DSO(BI0/AFIGL_O1400
The worried part is my DSO 0FIGL_O1400 is currecnly having nearly 60 Lacks records and MM cube is having nearly 55 requests which are required to update to the Above DSO for PO related PO value and Invoice amount.
The big issue here is while uploading data from MM cube to DSO say for example if the request is having 25,000 records from this nearly 500-600 records will be updated to DSO.
But here it is taking huge time ( nearly 3 days for request ) for updating these records , like this i have to pull 50 more requests from Cube to DSO as per the requirement.
Please note as of now i haven't created any indexes on DSO to improve this loads.
Please note am facing this issue in Production environment and need your help ASAP.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas Padugula

Hi,
If selecting data from 0FIGL_O14 is taking long time then you can create secondary indexes on DSO.
0FIGL_O14 would be huge as data volume directly corresponds to data volume in BSEG.
But for you requirement, I think what you can do is,
1. create multiprovider on top of DSO and Cube and create Bex report to give you the fields requried from both the infoproviders, you can then use open hub or APD approach to keep the data in the staging table or direct update DSO and then load the data to the DSO
2. Create secondary indexes on DSO so that fetching would be faster.
3. Do the enhancment at R/3 level to fetch fields from MM during load of G/L
Regards,
Pravin Karkhanis.

Account distribution by Quantity

Hi,
We are using SRm 4.0 with extended classic scenario.
We are facing an issue with cost distribution in shopping cart and purchase order.
In general, when we have a cost distribution, total value /qty in account assignment tab should match the item value / qty. If not is should give error. It is working fine, when the distribution is by percentage or value.
If it is by quantity, then it is not giving any error message in shopping cart.
In PO, if the quantity doesn't match, then it is giving the error "Sum of quantities >xxx< smaller than total quantity"
But if we delete any of the account assignment item in PO, then at that time also it is not giving the error even the total qty doesn't match the item qty.
Could you please help me to activate this validation in shopping cart and PO?
Thanks,
SS

Muthu,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Please find below the example:
PO item qty - 100
Cost distribution:
Line 1 - 50
Line 2 - 30
Line 3 - 20
Now the PO has been ordered. PO in backend is showing three account assignments.
After that, I have deleted the fiirst 2 account assignments (1 & 2).
Now the PO will show like:
PO item qty - 100
Cost distribution:
Line 1 - 50 (deleted)
Line 2 - 30 (deleted)
Line 3 - 20
Now the Po item qty and account assignment qty are not same. In this it should give an error. But I am still able to order the PO. When the PO has been transfered to backend, I could see only one account assignment in ME23N but the PO item qty is showing there. Because of that I could able to process confirmation and invoice.
Now, if I change the qty of this specific item, then the new qty is getting updated in teh account assignment tab against the third item.
Rather, if I try to add another item to the PO, then at that time it is giving the error messasge: Sum of quantities > xxx < sum of total quantities.
Till invoice has been posted, it is not giving the error message.
Thanks,
SS

General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items of the Leading Ledger

Hello Guys,
We are planning to implement
General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items of the Leading Ledger
0FI_GL_14
We are in ECC6 sap_appl 6.00 and BI 7.0 SP 14, BI Content 7.3 level 4.0
The new GL line item is available
Financial Accounting: General Ledger Accounting (FI-GL)
Available as of Release - SAP Enhancement Package 3 for SAP ERP 6.0
Shipment - SAP NetWeaver 7.0 BI Content Add-On 3 Support Package 08
Content Versions- 1.0; 703
Just we have to install SAP NetWeaver 7.0 BI Content Add-On 3 Support Package 08 and on ECC side SAP Enhancement package 3 for ERP 6.0 --. Financial accounting - SAP APPL 603.
Is it correct. Can you please confirm.
Thanks
Senthil

Hello Senthil,
Yes, thats engough, since SAP is recommending the same for that datasource 0FI_GL_14. I think you are already in that version.
See this SAP help document
[DataSource Transactional Data: 0FI_GL_14|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/45/4f8e8bbf3f4f63a5dd197ef7d53fa2/content.htm]
Thanks
Chandran

Open PO commitment report, for non-account assigned line material.

Hi expert,
Where can i find a report that gives me the open PO commitment, without any account assignment on the PO?
Meaning it is a warehouse material, but at the end of the period, I need to know wha`t is my commitment, and compare that to my budget.
I know I can get this information at the time of goods receipt, but my point is that I haven`t received the goods yet, and need to know what are my commitments.
I hope I was clear.
Thanks
Fotso

Hi Eli,
When i do exactly what you mentioned above, the system just add a new report which is "Range: Actual/Budget/Commitments
", which comes to the tcode.
So the drill-down lead me to the tcode again.
When I pressed "Configure" in the section Report/report interface, I saw there was already the receiver report "Cost Center: Actual Line Items".
So I guess I should add something similar to "Cost Center: Commitment Line Items". How can I do that?
Thank you
Fotso

How to configure Free of charge posting to cost account and not to balance?

Hi,
If we post GI for a free of charge delivery (sample) the following will be posted:
Cost of Sales 100
Finished goods 100
But we do not want to post to Cost of Sales but to a cost account.
What do I need to change?
Regards,
Eric.

Hi Eric van Zundert,
Follow below mentioned procedure;
1. OMJJ - Copy a new movement type as "901" from Movement type "601". For new movement type change the Valuation Modifier to "YAX" instead of "VAX" and SAVE.
2. OBYC - Here go to T/E key "GBB" and do the account determination for the new valuation modifier "YAX" of new movement type (Created in Step1).
3. VOV6 - Go to the Schedule Line Category (which is getting determined in Free of Charge Order) and assign the new Movement Type "901" instead of "601" and save.
Note: - If this Schedule Line Category is used for multiple Sales Orders then copy and create a new Schedule Line Category and do the changes for this one as suggeste din step3 and also do the schedule line category determination.
Now create a new order and do delivery and PGI and check A/c entry, also check during delivery it should pick up new Movement Type.
You need to take help of ur SD Consultant in this case.

Defaulting Cost accounting distribution line at Responsibility level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for