Deinterlace DOESN"T

Hi I'm converting HDV1080i60 to progressive MPEG-2 Transport stream. I drop the default Transport Stream setting on the HDV clip. Turn on Frame Controls, set Output Fields to Progressive and set the Deinterlace to Better (Motion adaptive). (The only other change I've made is to increase the Bit Rate settings of the Quality tab). Then submit.
However, when I drag the resulting .mt2 file in StreamClip or MediaInfo they both report an Interlaced Upper Field video track. What gives? These applications may be reporting wrongly, but I don't know of other applications which can load .m2t files. (I can't get info using QuickTime or Compressor as transport streams can't be read by these applications). Anyone?

I think I figured it out. I also had to set the Video Format area of the Encoder tab to Progressive.

Similar Messages

  • Rendering 10x slower with media encoder than Premiere pro direct export

    We use CS5 (have been using Adobe since 2004). I open a sequence (edited in Premiere with no fancy effect - just open title & closing title - length 4 minutes). It is HDV so nothing special or out of the ordinary.
    If I render the sequence by going to FILE => EXPORT => MEDIA and export this way it will take approx 1 minute to render the file.
    If I close Premiere and open Media Encoder and import the same sequence and render with exactly the same settings, it will take 10 or 11 minutes to render.
    I have tried most obvious areas such as closing all other programs and only opening media encoder, as well as making sure the RAM allocation is the same for media encoder, but nothing seems to make Media Encoder render at the same speed.
    It doesn't matter what the video format is on input or export ... media encoder is always so much slower.
    Why does Media Encoder take so much longer to render?

    Hello Jeff,
    thank you very much for the speedy response! I am very impressed
    Your reply pointed me in the correct direction. In my case I had ticked Maximum Render which made the encoding 10x slower. The deinterlacing doesn't affect the speed much on our set up.
    Anyhow, I unticked the Maximum Render Quality and it is now at full speed again. Lovely!
    Thank you for your time.
    Richard

  • Are DVDs Progressive? If So Why Doesn't Compressor Deinterlace?

    There are many things that puzzle me and this is one.
    DVDs are supposed to be progressive? However, if you look at any of Compressor's pre-sets for making "Best Quality" SD DVDs you will not see any mention of deinterlacing or progressive.
    Frame Controls are always off and Field Dominance is always automatic. So how does the video become deinterlaced or progressive? Does it happen in DVDSP ?

    Hi Ian,
    from Compressor when you choose to encode in MPEG2 for DVD, you can set all parameters in the video format.
    Here from the doc you can see a snapshot:
    http://documentation.apple.com/en/compressor/usermanual/#chapter=18%26section=21
    When parameters are set to automatic, that means Compressor will set that value depending the source material characteristics. But you can force the output field dominance to be progressive or interlaced, as both are supported when creating a DVD disk.
    Regards,
    Armando.

  • What type of deinterlacing does Apple use when exporting interlaced to QTM

    There are many different ways to deinterlace video so I wonder which of them apple uses in QT Pro when you want to export to a QT movie.
    For those who don't know what I'm talking about it concerns video that has been recorded for playback on a TV and each frame only holds half the information and needs to be meshed together or one of several techniques for it to play back on your computer monitor without leaving artifacts or horizontal lines around the edges of moving objects. No technique so far is perfect and I wonder which one apple chose because it doesn't give you any information on it.
    Thanks
    Kevin

    The metal skin is really glued around the edge by a plastic frame. It is this frame that holds the skin to the main frame and can give problems.
    I had to open my ti case to install an airport card. I either did it wrong or the apple glue job was poor because the gray plastic trim around the edge of the metal skin had come loose over 50% of the circumference.
    I had a commercial 3M rubber cement on hand so I used that. I applied it with a toothpick very sparingly (of course the rubber cement gets stringy so the job was a ittle messy).
    I let dry in a warm room for 24 hours. The reason I did that was fumes from curing glue can be caustic and attack some very thin metals etc. I fugured I wanted to lose any fumes before I trapped them in the warm computer.
    It worked well and I haven't had a repeat of the problem.

  • VLC doesn't save streaming audio to mp3 anymore

    I want to save streaming audio from the internet to my HDD in mp3 format while listening to it at the same time.  That worked fine when I did it with VLC, using the GUI.  To be specific, here are the settings that I used:
    VLC main menu: File>Open Network Stream>Open...Network>tick HTTP/HTTPS/FTP/MMS and enter the URL (http://vruk.sc.llnwd.net:12265) >under Advanced Options tick Stream/Save and click on Settings (opens Stream Output window)>Outputs, tick Play locally, tick File, click on Browse and enter filename and location for the stream saving file, i.e. /home/robert/vlcout.mp3>Encapsulation method, tick on Raw>Transcoding options, tick on Audio codec and select mp3>Bitrate 128 kb/s, Channels 2>OK, OK, to start recording. Stop or Quit VLC, to stop recording.
    Two days ago I upgraded VLC from v.0.8.5-9 to v.0.8.6a-4 (which also upgraded ffmpeg from v.20060920-1 to v.20070131-1), and now the above procedure isn't working anymore.  The stream isn't playing anymore over my speakers while the encoding supposedly is going on, the vlcout.mp3 file is empty (0B), and VCL gives me the following error messages:
    stream_out_transcode error: cannot find encoder ((null))
    stream_out_transcode error: cannot create audio chain
    main error: cannot create packetizer output (mpga)
    It looks as though VLC is failing to encode the stream to mp3.  The VLC documentation (see http://www.videolan.org/streaming-features.html) in a table of "possible output formats for the transcoding module" says that for mp3 audio "you have to compile ffmpeg with libmp3lame support."  Has the new ffmpeg v.20070131-1 (in extra) been compiled without mp3 support?  If so, why?  Apparently, the older version I was using last week supported mp3.
    libmp3lame is installed on my system.  There is a very recent alternative ffmpeg-svn-8218-1 pkgbuild in AUR that enables libmp3lame in the configure section of the build but when I try to install the package built that way it conflicts with ffmpeg v.20070131-1, and to remove the official ffmpeg v.20070131-1 I'd first have to remove a slew of other packages that depend on it.
    Is it possible to remove VLC v.0.8.6a-4 and ffmpeg v.20070131-1 and go back to the older versions that worked for me?  There was talk of a bug in ffmpeg in this forum at the end of January; what about it?
    What should I do?
    Robert
    Last edited by RobF (2007-03-14 16:25:51)

    I solved the problem for now by downgrading both vlc and ffmpeg to the earlier versions that I was using before.  Saving an audio stream in mp3 format is working again now.
    I believe there are problems with the current versions of both vlc and ffmpeg.
    1. vlc 0.8.6a doesn't seem to have ffmpeg enabled, i.e.
    $ vlc --list | grep ffmpeg
    VLC media player 0.8.6a Janus
    whereas with the older version I get
    $ vlc --list | grep ffmpeg
    VLC media player 0.8.5 Janus
      ffmpeg                FFmpeg audio/video decoder/encoder ((MS)MPEG4,SVQ1,H263,WMV,WMA)
      ffmpeg                FFmpeg chroma conversion
      ffmpeg                FFmpeg audio/video encoder
      ffmpeg                FFmpeg demuxer
      ffmpeg                FFmpeg video filter
      ffmpeg                FFmpeg crop padd filter
      ffmpeg                FFmpeg deinterlace video filter
    2. The current package ffmpeg v.20070131-1 in extra may not refer to various libraries correctly in its configure parameters.  E.g. in AUR there is an alternative pkgbuild ffmpeg-svn 8218-1 from 04-Mar-2007 in which the original configure parameters were replaced as follows:
    --enable-mp3lame --> --enable-libmp3lame
    --enable-vorbis --> --enable-libvorbis
    --enable-faac --> --enable-libfaac
    --enable-faad --> --enable-libfaad
    --enable-a52 --> --enable-liba52
    --enable-dts --> --enable-libdts
    Has the ffmpeg package in extra been compiled with mp3 support which is needed for the transcoding module of vlc to encode in mp3 format?  The alternative ffmpeg package in AUR conflicts with the ffmpeg package from extra, and I don't know how to tell the new vlc to use the alternative package instead of the one from extra. 
    Someone ought to look into this.
    Robert

  • Black screen after deinterlacing, 2 video cards inside MacPro

    Hi!
    I'm using QT 7.2 Working with HDV1080i footage.
    When I select Deinterlace option I get black screen...
    I'm using two video cards X1900 (2x30" cinema) and GF7300 (1x23"cinema)
    Please help...
    regards
    ARTI

    Hi,
    Safe Mode just loads basic video, it seems your graphic card doesn’t work properly with your computer.
    For this situation, this seems a hardware issue, before you send device back to ASUS, you can update your BIOS to the latest version for a check.
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Droplet created in 3.0 running now in 3.5 doesn't submit to Batch Monitor?

    I've got a droplet I created in FCS2 (Compressor 3?).
    I upgraded to FCS3 and tried to use my droplet.
    I get a window with 'Server: This computer - submitting 1 files'
    But in the Batch Monitor I never see anything appear under 'This Computer'.
    It's just a simple droplet to take a ProRes 422 HQ captured from an HV20 in their 24p in 60i format - that strips out the extra garbage and reverse telecines.
    1st time I've tried to use it with Compressor 3.5.
    How can I debug this?
    Name: 24p
    Description: Apple ProRes 422 10-bit video with audio pass-through. Settings based off the source resolution and frame-rate.
    File Extension: mov
    Estimated size: 73.75 GB/hour of source
    Audio: multi-track passthrough
    Video Encoder
    Format: QT
    Width: 1920
    Height: 1080
    Pixel aspect ratio: Square
    Crop: None
    Padding: None
    Frame rate: 23.976
    Frame Controls On:
    Retiming: (Fast) Nearest Frame
    Resize Filter: Linear Filter
    Deinterlace Filter: Reverse Telecine
    Adaptive Details: Off
    Antialias: 0
    Detail Level: 0
    Field Output: Progressive
    Codec Type: Apple ProRes 422 (HQ)
    Multi-pass: Off, frame reorder: Off
    Automatic gamma correction
    Progressive
    Chroma filtering enabled
    Pixel depth: 24
    Spatial quality: 50
    Min. Spatial quality: 0
    Temporal quality: 0
    Min. temporal quality: 0

    I found the original droplet in my Compressor settings list, and created a new droplet from 3.5.
    This time, when I dropped a file on it, it worked.
    But - in case I need to convert a droplet from 3.0 to 3.5 (that doesn't exist in Compressor settings), is there a way?

  • Turning off deinterlace in CS4 before video exporting or a substitute solution

    I have had a problem for a long time now regarding the missing function in the Premiere Pro CS4 Export Settings window when trying to export a video in FLV. When I playback the rendered sequence I get a poor quality video (it also looks like it is stretched vertically). In Premiere Pro CS3 however, I just had to uncheck the Deinterlace option in the Export Settings and then I had a crisp video. Since this option is clearly unavailable in CS4 does anyone know of any subtitution for unchecking the Deinterlace option in CS4? Please note that the output file must be FLV.
    The settings under Clip > Video Options > Field Options... do not seem to do the trick.

    Yes - your question had much to do with the issue.
    I was dealing with very different file formats and even file size.
    I found that m4v is very slow for FCE to process.
    I also found that I can convert files to FCE format much faster in a side program - I used Squared 5 Streamclip to cut the videos down to the clip I required, then saved them as Apple DV/DVCPRO-NTSC with the sound at AAC 48 128. It processed much faster in Streamclip! Then imported without the need to render at upload! I was very pleased to say the least. The output file is .mov and it seems like this makes your FCE much happier!
    We have too many options and not knowing what the options actually mean allows it to work, but really slowly!
    My biggest concern is - why was it sooooooo hard to find information online about this. I searched forever before posting a question. The hardest thing is trying to word the question to be short and find the words that will key into the answer since the words you use is how search works. Search doesn't read vibe - only keywords and frequency creating GOOGLE rank so it will show in the search.
    Thanks for the direction. I had read a lot of things but this was the direction that got me back in control of my MAC.

  • Interlace Deinterlace Export and Youtube Problem

    We bought a nice new high end consumer camera - the Panasonic HC X900M . For the price of about $800 this little camera shoots sharp, crisp, colorful, high definition video. My son is spending a year in China and did not want a large camera. Anyway....
    It shoots in these modes I believe:  1080p   and  1080i . So far so good. The video looks great. We get it into the computer. We did not want to buy a professional level video editing system / software.... So we have ADOBE Elements 10 (I believe it is 10 or 9).   (I use CS6 and like Adobe editing.)
    ELEMENTS does not work with 1080p. So we've decided to shoot in 1080i.
    We bring the video clips into Elements. The settings for the project MUST MATCH the video shot... we understand that. The camera has different settings for 1080i shooting. They are HA HG  HX  HE = different mbps. (Here is a link to the specifications in case you cannot read the jpeg) http://panasonic.net/avc/camcorder/hd/x900_series/specifications.html
    So we set the settings for the
    project at 1080i DV. Can't remember if it was 60i or 30i ? (I don't have his computer here with me...I cannot verify exact project settings. We tried a few)
    Does Elements support this camera's settings for video? In this case 1920 x 1080 60i ?  (list above) Can Elements support any of these, and how? I assume so, but if one mode in particular should be used, please advise.
    For testing we shot in HA I believe to get as much quality in 1080i. We edited a test sequence. It looks and sounds great, plays back just fine in laptop software. Then we export. (The goal is to compress down to the internet Youtube best quality.) We first go to export to Youtube / Web. But Adobe will not ACCEPT his user name and password. We cannot log on to Youtube. Yes, the password is correct. So that does not work. Strike one.
    We decide to export to desktop. We try H.264  and try to set the settings correctly, but every attempt at every setting, results in bad interlaced video. Strike two. There are many many options for export settings. We have tried a great number of options.
    Any settings suggestions to make this work? Besides deinterlacing every single clip on the timeline? Or is that the only option.
    Is there any editing software you can recommend - not high end professional - that will work?
    Thanks for the help.

    Premiere Elements can definitely work with video from this camcorder shot in 1920x1080 AVCHD at 60i. It also appears that your cam can shoot in both stereo and 5.1 audio, both of which Premiere Elements can support -- but take note of which you select so that you can match these specs when you set up your program.
    Currently Premiere Elements doesn't support 1920x1080 at 60p -- that consumer interest in that format is growing, so you may well see support for it in an upcoming version of the program.
    Most professional video editors will work with 1080p60, including Premiere Pro CS6 and Vegas Pro.
    As for the different quality levels of your video, that's your call. The program should be able to work with any of them. But if you want the best results, I'd use the highest bit rate/quality.

  • Deinterlacing in Compressor

    Does Compressor 2.3 have ANY deinterlacing algorithms that are worth a crap? I'm trying to format some interlaced DV video for the iPod (On another note, we want more options and control in the iPod setting, Apple!), which means deinterlacing. Frame controls look good...if you have endless hours to dedicate to encoding, massive processing power, or your video is less than five minues. I started a 25 minute video overnight on Auto and when I woke up, it had 32 hours left to go. Setting frame controls to the lowest setting for deinterlacing goes faster, but produces poor quality. Using the old deinterlacing checkbox is pathetic as well. Odd and Even just toss out data, making the end result look like a blocky mess. Sharp doesn't get rid of all the combing, and blur is okay, except in scenes of high motion you get some really nasty ghosting instead of a healthy motion blur. Trying to do it in Quicktime produces shockingly awful video quality.
    Now, there's a free program called MPEG Streamclip. The compression doesn't look quite as nice. It's very close, but not quite as good. However, the deinterlacing works very well and it compresses in a fraction of the time. Nice to see a piece of an expensive, high-end video suite get blown away by a piece of free software. Sorenson Squeeze's Odd/Even deinterlacing blow ALL of Apple's options and frame controls out of the water. It produced the highest quality of any compressor I've used. Sadly, I've only got the demo copy that leaves a watermark, so I really can't use it, and I don't have $500 to spend on it. Trying to deinterlace the DV file with JES Deinterlacer and then formatting produces lesser quality output.
    So in the end, what's the deal with your deinterlacing algorithms, Apple? Compressor can produce good deinterlacining if you can wait for days on end, but that's utterly unacceptable. Am I missing something here? Anyone know if Compressor 3 has solved some of these issues?
    1.83ghz Core Duo iMac 17"   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   2GB RAM

    If you're doing this for your iPod and your video is at least twice as big as the iPod dimensions, here's what you do for perfect compression:
    1) Add the deinterlace filter to every clip in your sequence. Do not apply it to a nested version, it needs to be the original timeline or an exact duplicate of it.
    2) Duplicate the sequence and delete all the contents of the timeline in the new sequence. This is in order to make a sequence with identical settings. Now go into the sequence settings and change the aspect ratio and dimensions to whatever it'll be on the iPod, and also set it to PROGRESSIVE. Make sure to turn Motion Filtering or whatever they call it to Fast (Linear). Unless you know something I don't, you should probably turn this off in your original sequences too.
    3) Now nest the deinterlaced sequence into the smaller sequence (drag the sequence file itself into the new timeline). I believe the scaling will be done for you but if not just fix that in the Motion settings, which you'll only need to do once since it's a nested sequence with no separate clips.
    4) Render the entire sequence, and then Export as Quicktime Movie (NOT Export using Quicktime Conversion). INCLUDE Compression markers but DO NOT CHECK THE BOX about making the Quicktime movie independent (or something like that, I forgot what it's called, not at my PowerMac right now).
    5) Put that Quicktime into Compressor, but edit your settings so that Frame Controls are OFF.
    I left out a lot of the little details because I figure the above solves your particular problem. If you're worried the deinterlace filter is removing data, it's not. The temporal data is rendered by Final Cut Pro and the resolution, which would normally be halved by the deinterlacing process, is shrunk down to half-size or less anyway, negating the loss in resolution.
    And no, you shouldn't have to do all this since supposedly FCP and Compressor work together, but it's the only solution I could come up with that produced pristine results and didn't take too long.

  • Capturing MiniDV, then deinterlacing it?

    Hi. I'm trying to do something very very simply in iMovie HD, but failing miserably.
    I want to import some DV-PAL-Widescreen MiniDV footage from my digital camcorder, get a nice big uncompressed .dv file on my desktop, deinterlace, then import it back into iMovie HD for editing and final exporting.
    The stage where this is going wrong is deinterlacing. I've put the .dv file through JES Deinterlacer, but the file that software exports has a Normal Size of 787 x 576, not 768 x 576. This is causing problems when I re-import the deinterlaced .dv file back into iMovie HD, because iMovie doesn't recognise it as an anamorphic PAL-Widescreen file, and displays it as 4:3 within a 16:9 frame. So it's stretched, and has black bars to the left and right of it. Not good.
    I'm sure lots of people have solved this problem before. I just wish I knew how.

    Hi Reuben:
    You really need Matti Haveri to answer this. He may show up...in the meantime, this is from his website:
    - iMovie HD has a preference setting for Automatic DV Pillarboxing & Letterboxing
    This setting matters when importing 4:3 material to a 16:9 DV Widescreen project (pillarboxing), or when importing 16:9 material to a 4:3 DV project (letterboxing) from a camcorder.
    Unchecking the "iMovie HD/Preferences.../Import/Automatic DV Pillarboxing & Letterboxing" setting doesn't do those actions automatically after importing and when switching to edit mode.
    If for some reason that settings doesn't seem to work, you can try to save and quit the project immediately after importing (do NOT switch to edit mode!). When you then open the project, there should be no pillarboxing or letterboxing.
    http://www.sjoki.uta.fi/~shmhav/iMovieHD_6_bugs.html#pillar_letterboxingpref
    Maybe that will help?
    Sue

  • How to disable Deinterlace?

    I have some film based material captured from videotape.
    So it is originally progressive even it is in interlaced mode in the tape.
    I have to do resizing to it (because qt7 does not support non-square pixels in mp4's), so I'm going to use "Frame Controls".
    I'd like to use Resize filter at Best, but how can disable the deinterlacing, without losing any resolution?
    If I set Deinterlace to Fast, it will still do Line averaging, which will decrease picture quality of originally progressive footage.
    If I set it to Best it will take 30sec to compress one frame...
    Help, pretty please?

    I think "legal" DVDs can only have one of three types of audio, either uncompressed PCM, Dolby/AC3 (and I guess DTS), and MPEG1 layer 2. MPEG1 layer 2 is supposed to be popular with PAL material and Apple's support for that format is somewhat limited, so could that be the audio format you have?
    If that's the case I'd just demux your original MPEG2 file to a .m2v and either PCM/AIFF or .m1a/.mp2 (the latter being typical files extensions for MPEG1 layer 2 audio). I don't know if MPEG Streamclip will output from MPEG1 layer 2 to PCM/AIFF but if it doesn't there are utilities that will. Also, you might try a different demux utility if you think Streamclip is failing to maintain the progressive setting in your video. Try the freeware bbDEMUX utility or the $10 shareware program MPEG2 Works. bbDEMUX is getting a little old, but it still works for me. However, its drag and drop interlace doesn't function, thus use file -> open. In addition to demux, MPEG2 Works also does conversion from MPEG1 layer 2 audio to 48KHz WAV and a number of other tasks including both MPEG1 and MPEG2 compression.
    After that, I'd just use Compressor to output directly from the resultant .m2v and PCM/AIFF files. I wouldn't worry (at first) about the 720x540 versus 720x576 issue since Apple's software often seems to report dimension for MPEG2 that are auto-magically adjusted for pixel format. The end result may be fine.
    As for the Frame Controls and deinterlacing, it may be as you suggest (same as source/native field dominance progressive). Why don't you just give it a try and see if it deinterlaces the video or not (that is, if you can't see any difference in the before and after then why worry about it).

  • Deinterlacing Issues on Export

    FCP 4.5
    I'm working in a DV-NTSC sequence whose sequence preset is lower field.
    When I output any kind of QT movie using QT conversion, the output contains artifacts that look like they need to be deinterlaced. On image tracking moves and effects like pushes and wipes, the edge of the image is fragmented or stuttered.
    I've tried checking the "deinterlace" option on QT export, but that doesn't help. I think I've even tried changing the sequence presets to "even" and "none" (all options on the sequence preset) and that doesn't help.
    I've tried exporting a 10 bit uncompressed file (with deinterlace checked) from QT Pro of the final FCP movie, and that doesn't help.
    The only way I can fix it is taking it into Cleaner and choosing "deinterlace, adaptive, blend". Field changes within Cleaner (like odd or even) don't help. And "blend" helps to remove the stuttering effect and the fragmented edges in images, but only by blurring the field.
    I've also tried exporting a 10 bit uncompressed movie of my sequence from FCP, then importing that movie and placing a FCP deinterlace filter on the movie, rendering, and then exporting that movie again, and that doesn't help.
    How do I fix this?
    Thanks.
      Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

    If you're watching this on the desktop in QuickTime player, it defaults to displaying only one set of fields. CMD-J, then turn on High Quality.
    Patrick

  • Why Doesn't Premiere Elements 12 Recognize My Sony AVCHD Camera?

    This is my first attempt at using Premiere Elements 12.  Unfortunately, it is not recognizing my Sony HDR AVCHD format camera.  It uses a san disk.  I get a message "No supported devices detected".  It does find the jpg photos, though.
    So I directly loaded the MTS files onto my iMac and created a DVD.  It looked pretty good, but not as good as playing the camera directly on a TV.  I found something on another Adobe site that indicated if there were problems with Premiere reading from the card that the files could be loaded to the hard drive.  It said "Be sure to copy the entire file structure of the card instead if just the clips".  I'm not sure what that means.  All I did was download the MTS files.
    So I really have 2 questions here -
    1 - why doesn't Premiere recognize my camera
    2- Is there something on the san card I missed downloading that could improve the quality of the DVD being created?
    Any thoughts would be appreciated. 

    Rickster213
    Thanks for the reply and your additional comments and results.
    I think that we need to make distinctions between Quality (how good or bad the results looks or sounds to you) and Resolution (Frame Size, Display Size). Often the two can go side by side.
    What you are seeing at the camera level is 1080i which is interlaced video at 1920 x 1080 @ 29.97 interlaced frames per second. What you are seeing when you play back your finished DVD-VIDEO on DVD disc is based on 720 x 480 @ 29.97 interlaced frames per second (if standard 4:3) and 720 x 480 @ 29.97 interlaced frames per second accompanied by a 16:9 flag to stretch the 720 x 480 to 856 x 480 for display after encoding. Another factor is what the TV or computer player is doing to your interlaced video for viewing purposes - deinterlacing or not and with what method. Some TV's come with technology to enhance the DVD-VIDEO display. Most TVs larger than 32 to 42 in tend to show the differences between higher and lower resolution more readily.
    Since you have interlaced video source, each frame has two fields, with either Upper or Lower Field First. Your source probably is interlaced video with Upper Field First. Consequently, in the project, you may have to adjust that to Lower Field First if your destination is DVD-VIDEO on DVD disc which is characterized by Field Order Lower Field First. Something to look into for the "better" aspects considerations.
    Now if you decide to take your Timeline content to AVCHD format on DVD disc, note that the format of AVCHD format on DVD disc is different from that of the DVD-VIDEO on DVD disc (Instead of OpenDVD and VIDEO_TS Folder, you have the BDMV Folder). Your AVCHD on DVD disc will have resolution (Frame Size, Display Size) of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Under these circumstances, the capacity of the DVD disc can become a problem with larger projects. When you burn your Timeline content to AVCHD format on DVD disc, what is on the disc will be an 29.97 interlaced frames per second characterized by Upper Field First. So, if your interlaced source and the destination product both use Field Order Upper Field First, then no need for Field Options adjusts. However you do have one opportunity for a progressive frame rate for the AVCHD on DVD. It is not 29.97, rather 24. See Presets = H.264 1920 x 1080p NTSC Dolby in the AVCHD on DVD set up in Publish+Share/Disc AVCHD disc.
    I have generated some very great looking DVD-VIDEO on DVD disc (standard and widescreen) and have been very pleased with the results and how my viewers received them. The thought is getting the best possible DVD-VIDEO on DVD and enjoying it without laboring on how it might have looked as Blu-ray or AVCHD if you do not have Blu-ray and do not have a player for AVCHD on DVD disc.
    If you need clarification on any of the above, please let me know.
    Thanks.
    ATR
    Add On...In post 3 marked in reply to me you wrote
    "On a side note, however, I'm not sure I agree with the statement that going to standard def would lose a lot of video quality"
    I did not write that in any of my posts to you. That is why I have gone through the detailed account to qualify that statement from wherever it came.

  • DEINTERLACE mystery

    i see it referenced a lot in support materials... but where
    to deinterlace so we can place our broadcast content on our wbsite
    eludes me. Santa has told me if someone doesn't clear this up - he
    is canceling christmas.
    he sounded serious too.
    please help... if not for me... do it for the children.
    - Blitzen

    hey rodk!
    Thanx for your help, i just started with j2ee and i was really close to burning my comp because of that !@#)@#*(%! error, but now my app works fine.

Maybe you are looking for