Delete Idocs not processed

Hi, I know there are some Reports to execute which will delete Idocs. We have some Idocs that have status 51, and want to delete them.
Any ideas?

Hi,
<b>1st way:-</b>
IDOC Related programs
1. Archive RSEXARCA and RSEXARCB  
<b>2. Delete RSEXARCD </b>
3. Read archiveRSEXARCR 
4. Restore RSEXARCL 
<b>2nd way:-</b>
use FM <b>EDI_DOCUMENT_DELETE</b> .
pass the IDoc Number to it and delete the one which you want.
<b>3rd way:-</b>
use the tcode WE11 or program RSETESTD to delete an IDOC
Regards
Sudheer

Similar Messages

  • Idocs not processed automatically in BW

    Dear Experts,
    I have a scenario here where I extract data from source system via process chains.
    The source system job completed and in BW, the outbound idocs resulted in the following Status (02).
    02  Error passing data to port 1
    In the infopackage message dialog, I got the message as
    Could not find code page for receiving system
    Errors have been reported in Business Information Warehouse during the IDoc update:
    In order to resolve this, I'm manually processing the idoc using program RBDAGAIN.
    Note: This issue occurs only when I trigger the infopackage via process chains.
    How do I rectify this error so that the idocs are processed automatically in BW?
    Br, Harish

    Hi,
    how much time your ecc job takes to finish job.
    Is this process chain newly created one or old one?
    if its old one, any changes were applied on this process chain recently?
    is it showing any idoc numbers at below status bar.
    if yes then try to pull them by using t code BD87.
    Can you share info pack error message screen shot.
    Thanks

  • Field BKPF-BVORG in idoc not processed

    hi,
    we are using idoc-type FIDCC2 for posting FI-documents.
    In the idoc we have filled field BVORG. when the document is created BVORG is empty and not taken from the idoc.
    does anybody have an idea ?
    best regards, Martin

    Correct.  At least one BSEG-BUKRS (there could be multiple line items in BSEG) should be different from BKPF-BUKRS for the field BKPF-BVORG to have any value in it.  When you post cross-company code document, you initiate the posting in one company code and system posts two accounting documents (assuming there are two company codes in question) - one in the initiating company code and another in the second company code in question.  The value in BKPF-BVORG in the initiating company code document is the document number + initiating company code + last two digits of the fiscal year.  The same value gets stored in BVORG of the header record of the second company code document as well.  Please note that the BELNR in the second company code can be different from the BVORG, since that BELNR is determined from the number available in the number range of that second company code.  In case of the first company code, the BELNR is same as the first 10 characters of BVORG.
    The value in BVORG "links" the accounting documents in the two (or more) company codes involved in the cross-company code business transaction.  There is no BVORG in BSEG.

  • IDOC is not processing in R/3 with status 64(Urgent)--Production issue.

    Dear Folks,
    Here we are implementing MIRROR sytem for data extraction in to BIW.
    I had gone through the steps in PDF file(How to minimize down thime for Delta Initialization) which has given by SAP.
    These are following steps I had performed in BW production
    1. Using RSADMIN transcation- Assigned one user as a Debugging user.
    2. With the Debugging user Created one infopackage on Purhcasing ITM datasource--
        In data selection tab, I given date as from 2002 to 2003
        In Update tab, I selected update mode as Initialize Delta process-               without data transfer and Uncheck Update Data in master   system immediately
       In schedule tab I selected option Start Data load immediately then Start extraction.
    3.Data was requested and It was intialized properly with green status 1 from 1 Records.
    4. In details tab Request, Extraction, transfer(IDOC and TRFC), Processing everything in Green color.
    5.As per document I have checked in R/3 for IDOC with status 64 using transaction BD87/WE05
    Problem is that IDOC is not processing in R/3 system. for that IDOC I have checked in BW montior screen using the option <b>IDOC list in Source sytem</b>, here also it is not showing any IDOCs.
    Please let me know why BW sytem is not sending any IDOCs to source sytem.Is there any settings I could have miss in BW aswell as in R/3 system.
    Note: In BW production I successfully loaded master data from R/3. aswell as I triggered infopackage-Initialization with data transfer, it is showing IDOC number properly in R/3 system.
    Points is Assured for all replies.

    Hi,
    - check you RFC destination (normal test + authorization test)
    - Check you partner profiles in WE20 and its ports WE21
    - from the source system tree (RSA13) right click your source system and perform a check
    - the best is to restore your source R/3 source system from BW (right click on it ans select RESTORE); you'll need to be able to log in the source system as an admin as well as opening the source system for customizing in SCC4 so that BW can recreate the correct partner parameters automatically; the best is to do that with your basis group.
    hope this helps,
    Olivier.

  • Idoc in 53 status but not processed completely. Missing authorisation error

    Hi ,
    Some of the ORDER Idocs are in 53 status, but the orders are not processed successfully and no PO created for these Idocs.
    They got below warning message when I checked in WPER transaction code.
    " Missing authorization: Purchase Order Create Purchasing Grou 110 " - "Workitems (tasks) were created for this IDoc"
    This is happening once in a while for some of the idocs. Remaining all idocs are posting successfully.
    These IDOCu2019s are processed via user background. Not sure why we have authorisation issues as this user has SAPALL. Any ideas?
    Thanks
    Deepthi.

    done.

  • ALE - Idoc not getting processed automatically, instead going fine in Debug

    Hello All,
    I have a problem with Inbound idoc processing.
    IDoc settings were made 'immediate processing' in WE20, and the process code is set correctly and the attached of Z-Fun. module to process the idocs to process code.
    The error in inbound side is as 'Function module not allowed: APPL_IDOC_INPUTI' 51 status. Am sure i have to do some thing with ALE settings.
    Can some body help me with correction step or sequence of steps  for this ALE process.
    Thanks & Regards, Jilan

    Hi Jilan,
    Plz follow the steps:
    ALE Configuration:
    •     WE30 - IDOC type creation
    •     WE31 - Create segment
    •     WE81 - Message type creation
    •     WE82 - Link IDOC type to Message type
    •     SE37   - Create Inbound Function Module
    •     BD51  - Maintain entry for Function Module
    •     WE57 - Maintain
    •     BD57  - Link Function Module, IDOC type and Message type
    •     WE42 – Create Inbound Process Code
    •     BD67  - Link Process code to Function Module
    •     WE20 - Create Partner Profile
    •     BD64  -  Display Distribution Model
    •     WE02 -  IDoc List, Display all Inbound/Outbound IDocs
    •     WE14 -  Outbound Processing of IDoc’s
    •     BD20 -  Inbound Processing of IDoc’s
    1st Step:   Create  a Segment  ( WE31)
             Segment is a structure for passing data in IDoc. It actually contains the IDoc data, just like the DDIC table/structure. Segment is created with all the required fields. Then Save it.  But, to actually use this Segment, you have to Release the Segment, otherwise u can’t use the Segment, by menu, EDIT--> Set Release.
             Now, if you want to do some change to this Segment, u cant, unless & until u Cancel the Release, by Edit--> Cancel Release.
    2nd Step:   Create IDOC Type  ( WE30 )
            After creating the Segment, now we have to create the IDoc Type. IDOC Type is like an envelop of a letter, which contains the data inside it, & also some more information like address. IDoc type can be Basic Or Extended.
           Basic IDoc Type:  Using some SAP existing IDOC type (ex. MATMAS) or Custom IDOC type.
           Extension IDOC Type:  When we need some fields extra to an existing IDOC type, then we can extend that Basic Idoc Type by another Segment. This is called Extended idoc type
    3rd Step:   Create Message Type (WE81)
         Message Type is like the Postman for sending the Letter.
      4th Step:   Attach Message Type to the IDOC Type (WE82)
    5th Step:   Create a Function Module (SE37)
           Write the Processing logic in a Function Module.
    6th Step:   Mention the IDOC Type, i.e, 0/1/2 (BD51)
    7th Step:   Assign the Message Type, IDOC Type & Function Module (WE57)
    8th Step:   Create a Custom Process Code (WE42)
    9th Step:   Attach the Function Module to the Process Code (BD67)
    10th Step: Execute Inbound IDOC’ s (WE19)
    Example Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS (Standard FM to create Sales Order).
    reward is useful,
    regards,
    Tanmay

  • Idocs neding in 64 status and not processed further

    Hi
    We have inbound idocs of FIDCC2 message type, which are set to be triggered immediately. However we have noticed that sometimes (not always) these idocs are in 64 status and are not processed further. We have to manually reprocess them.
    What could be the problem? Where should we start investigating?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Mick

    I think the comment by Gautham Vangaveti  is probably correct.
    We hit the same issue occassionally.  We have IDOCS as trigger immediately, but at the time they try to process, there are no available work processes which can handle the IDOC and they sit at status 64.
    There is an oss note 1333417 which describes the situation
    https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1333417
    And unhelpfully suggests changing over to processing by batch job, which is not always appropriate.
    It may be worth enlisting help from you Basis team to try and indentify if those going to status 64 are occuring at the same time each day, and maybe looking to see what other processes are running at that time.  If the load on the system can be managed then the problem may go away, it did for us.
    Otherwise, Basis may be able to increase the number of work process which may also resolve the issue.

  • Idocs are not processed in the right order.

    Hi,
    I face a problem that when there are a large number of IDocs (Inbound) posted the Idocs are not processed in the right order.
    Msg type: MBGMCR
    any idea how this can happen?
    what is the solution?
    br
    Karen

    No answer

  • Report RBDAPP01 not processing IDocs in status 51

    Hello guys,
    I have a problem with the execution of some Inbound Idocs using program RBDAPP01.
    Now the Idoc is executed in background with a job. Sometimes we have some locks because we receive idocs going to the same order, and then remain in status 51.
    In the variant of the job we filled to execute Idocs with status 64 and 51, but the idocs that remain in status 51 are not processed, at the end we have to do it manually.
    There is no parallel processo to avoid the locks.
    Do you know how we can solve it?
    Many thans in advance.
    Regards,
    Xavi.

    i do have the same problem. is there an solution to this?

  • Idoc in 53 status but not processed completely.

    Hi ,
    Some of the ORDER Idocs are in 53 status, but the orders are not processed successfully and no PO created for these Idocs.
    They got below warning message when I checked in WPER transaction code.
    " Missing authorization: Purchase Order Create Purchasing Grou 110 " - "Workitems (tasks) were created for this IDoc"
    This is happening once in a while for some of the idocs. Remaining all idocs are posting successfully.
    Any idea what might be the reason? 
    Thanks
    Deepthi.

    Hello,
    This seems to be an Authorisation issue, Kindly check for Purchasing Group 110, who are all assigned Buyers...
    Then for those Buyers.. you can check what authorization is missing from Su53..
    Compare with those who has authorisation to create PO Vs who does not have ..
    you will have to provide the same authorisation to those users
    Thanks and regards
    PJ

  • Inbound Idocs are not Processing

    Hi,
    Inbound IDOCS queue is not processing if any one IDOC is showing amber(error) . Please let me know the resolution to avoid this issue or let me know the BASIS setting to avoid it.
    Regards,
    PVK.

    Hello,
    Can you please explain your issue is with "Trigger by Background program" or "Trigger immediately"?
    For Trigger immediately, if there is no free dialog work process available than IDocs are posted with status 64.
    For Trigger by Background program, Background job RBDAPP01 will process IDocs depending on variant you define to select & process IDocs(i.e., IDoc Status = 64).
    It is always recommended to use "Trigger by Background program" for high volume interface which has large number of IDocs.
    Help on RBDAPP01
    Regards,
    Sameer

  • Idoc WPUWBW: Status 51 - IDoc not fully processed

    Hi All!
    Hi All!
    This is regarding Goods Moment.
    In Quality, Idoc is successfully generated at POSDM system and also in ECC system.
    In Production, Idoc is successfully generated at POSDM, but in ECC it is failed (Idoc WPUWBW: Status 51-IDoc not fully processed).
    So, at WPER it is showing as In deficit of stock. But stock is available.
    Kindly suggest me how to close this issue.
    Note: PFA Below. Its the screenshot of the error at WPER.
    With Regards,
    Yarnagula Sudhir.

    Dear Venu
    Difficult to answer with this limited information. If you share some more info will be easier to help
    regards
    Manish

  • IdocReceiver not processing all the idocs produced from PFAL in OrgModeler

    Dear experts,
    We are on below Nakisa version.
    Name Nakisa OrgModeler
    Version 4.0 SP1
    Build 0910021700
    I ran the initial load for the OrgModeler and it produced around 500 idocs. When I followed the command line interface, it processed around 56 idocs. The idoc status becomes 03 (Data Processed to Port OK) at the R/3 end for all the idocs. However idocreceiver is skipping many idocs in between and processing only few. I checked the database for HRP1000 and HRP1001 and the records loaded are not even 20% of the records in R/3 for the objects and relationships(HRP1000 obj types C, O, Q,S and HRP1001 002/003/007/008/011/012 etc) we filter at the distribution model.
    I think  the issue might not be an authorzation problem as its fetching the records from SAP R/3 and loading few records in the database.
    I checked with my Basis consultant about another reciever running and grabing the missing records. He confirmed that only one idocreceiver running at nakisa end. I even happened to check the SAP gateway server(SMGW) and with TP Name NAKIDOC and symbollic destination NAK_RFC_DEST I can see only one record which is appearing on and off. When the record appear on the gatway server, the corresponding idoc being processed at command line interface. Till the other record appears on the sap gateway server, the idocs are missing at the command line interface.
    Below is the screen shot from idocreceiver. (After the idoc 1695358 it processed 1695366 then 1695372 etc)
    Any suggestions would be a great help.

    Dear All,
    My Basis guy finally realised that he started a Jco provider at the netweaver end and causing the issue. He stopped it and all the idocs processed successfully.
    I learned the below points and might useful for few folks.
    1.No idoc being processed and all the idocs failing with 'Bean IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS not found on host'. It should be an authorization error and assigning the Authorization Object: S_IDOCDEFT (EDI_TCD = "WE30"; ACTVT = "03") will resolve the issue.
    2. Few idocs are being processed at idoc receiver end.
    i. Check for multiple idoc receivers which might be active and running.
    ii. Check the number of connections and timeout parameters and set them to the maximum.
    Thanks,
    Manohar

  • IDoc not visible in target R3 system

    Hello
    I am working on File-to-IDoc test scenario where I am sending CREMAS IDoc to R3 system (through IDoc receiver adapter). I performed all the necessary configuration which includes
    RFC Dest of type R3 in both the systems
    Creating ports in both the systems with port name similar to logical sys name of business system
    Creating Partner profile for the above port with Inbound message type as CREMAS
    When I am viewing the message in SXMB_MONI it shows successfully processed but Outbound status is still showing as "Message Scheduled on Outbound Processing". Also when I checked on the R3 side using we02, I could'nt find any IDoc over there. I checked in the trace where it states "Async processing completed OK".
    Am I missing any configuration on R3 side which is not processing an IDoc?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Rajeev

    Hello
    Thanks for the replies but i did configuration exactly as shown in the weblog. My RFC Destination is working fine.Also theres nothing in SM58. Also in SMQ2 "Nothing is selected" that means the message is processed successfully.
    In SXMB_MONI it shows status as "Processed Successfully" but the Outbound Status is "Scheduled for Outbound processing".
    In addition to this, I tried to test run (through SE37
    ) the FM "IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS" in the receiving system with the control paramters of XI and that is creating the IDoc.
    Regards
    Rajeev

  • Job getting cancelled for 'Chain not processed for date-2007031920070318' ?

    Hi All,
      We have 2 process chains running only on weekdays - one for sales and the other for billing. A cancelled job is created for one of the process chains with the job log message as 'Chain not processed for date-2007031920070318' for the not run days whereas the other does not have any issues though the same monitor job program runs for both. The difference is only in the variant but nothing much other than that its maintained for 2 different chains.
       We also debugged the monitor job program. It basically does nothing other than displaying messages depending on the status of the chain log.
    Please let me know your suggestions as to why it happens.
    Thanks,
    krishna

    it is also giving following error message:
    Caution: Program has changed
    Caution: At time of termination,  Active source code no longer available  and after above two statements its giving sign "?" before every statement in below manner:
    024300 ?     lit_ekpo_dummy1[] = it_ekpo[].                     
    024310 ?     DELETE lit_ekpo_dummy1 WHERE ebeln NE tab1-ebeln.  
    024320 ?     DESCRIBE TABLE lit_ekpo_dummy1 LINES count01.      
    024330 ?                                                        
    024340 ?     REFRESH lit_ematn_dummy[].                         
    024350 ?     lit_ematn_dummy[] = lit_ematn[].

Maybe you are looking for

  • Images not in "~/Pictures/iPhoto Library" folder not properly handled

    One of the features I was grateful for in iPhoto 6 is the ability to NOT import photos into the ~/Pictures/iPhoto Library" folder. This meant I could use iPhoto to view and edit photos without duplicating a folder structure I use for my photo files.

  • Can large PDFs with duplicate pages be compressed

    We have batches of 500 letters that are identical except for name address and a few other embedded fields. The 500 letters are combined into a single large file for transfer. The file is downloaded to a print vendor then the single PDF is sent to a h

  • No sound suddenly from pc please h

    Hi guys,?Recently my pc has no sound coming out form speaker when i start windows, i tried to update all softwares and plug out my sound card and install again also useless. Why is it like this?

  • Report Layout Design

    Hi All, I need your help to design a BEx Report , on rows I have Cost Center Groups and on Column I have Fiscal Year Period And the YTD should be a displayed as a different block and another Block Under Fiscal Period.

  • Can't create Labview 6.02 runtime server.

    I tried to use the Labview source code for the Runtime Server to build a LV 6.02 Runtime Server that I can use in TestStand 2.0 with a Visual Basic Operator Interface. Right now, I cannot run an example TestStand sequence with the example Visual Basi