"Deletion Indic. not set in BE"

Hi,
Does anybody came accross 'Deletion Indic. not set in BE' seletion criterion on BBP_GET_STATUS_2.
Surprsingly, their exists no code in the program which is using this parameter 'be_del' and their are no OSS message for the same.
Any ideas on this one.
Regards,
Piyush Garg

Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
We are using SRM 5.5 version. No problems, there is not any code for the field "be_del" as such. We have not faced this problem yet.
Please provide the detailed process to show how to replicate the steps.
<u>Meanwhile, Have a look at the following relevant SAP OSS Notes</u>.
Note 1040917 - BBP_STATUS_READ: Error messages are not deleted
691569 - Error messages in BBP_GET_STATUS_2
Note 890319 ActualValues in SC from back-end documents are not deleted
989891 BBP_GET_STATUS_2: Incorr quantity determination in back end 
1040847 Requirement is removed from sourcing after BBP_GET_STATUS_2
1012124 SHP not reappear in SOCO after backend PO delete
1032713 BBP_GET_STATUS_2: incorrect sourcing indicator  
757625 Incorrect Status I1112->analysis report
755769 Status I1113, no item or header relations->analysis report
994314 PO appears twice in applet preview in limit SHP 
949162 Follow-on documents exist, status I1111 and I1113 active
947198 IMS monitor: Web Dynpro with hierarchies
922575 BE_REFOBJ and BE_REFOBJ_ITEM filled during Confirmation(SUS)
844209 BE_REFOBJ is filled at confirmation
798044 Correction for object links missing between SC and BE docs
776921 Display of deleted purchase orders on history screen
723680 Corrections in the mapping of SAP XML messages
723594 SRM 4.0 XML confirmation mapping error   
662411 BBP_GET_STATUS_2: Too many database updates
651040 No update of shopping cart after reversing goods receipt
638505 Delete shopping cart item: Status stil active
604420 Composite SAP note SRM 3.0 SP1 group
626109 Enhancement BBP_PD_SC_REF_GETLIST for local bid invitations
619897 EBP 3.0: local SC reporting and SC status
576555 Perf: BBP_GET_STATUS_2/Confirmatn for only Classic Scenario
578033 Item from the shopping cart are deleted in backend
573202 'Buffer table not up to date' for APPEND at tables
570440 Problems with Delete/Restore of back end documents
551276 Too many database updates in BBP_GET_STATUS_2
498899 Correction instructions for EBP 3.0 in Note 436151 incorrect
422697 Change of structure 'BBPS_SC_REFUPDATE'
459422 EBP SC Status: Backend PO delete indicator set at random
501052 Deleted purchase orders not displayed in the history
513034 History for an extended limit purchase order in test status
417334 EBP/BBP: Deletion of requisition not displ. when UOM wrong
426444 BBP_GET_STATUS_2: Dump
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Similar Messages

  • Firm or Trade-Off Zone Indicator not set

    Hi
    I have created the scheduling agreement and run the MRP by this the schedule lines are generated but the system has not set Firm or Trade-Off Zone Indicator how do I go head? IS there any customization/master data required to set the this indicator?
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Prashant.

    This depends a bit on how you communicate to your vendors.
    Assuming EDI, then the message to the vendor will contain a few date fields
    A. ABFDE End of production go-ahead
    Which is the 'end' of the FIRM ZONE
    B. ABMDE End of material go-ahead
    Which is the 'end' of the TRADEOFF ZONE.
    Upon receipt the vendors system will recognize these dates.
    Assuming printout, you need to work in SAP-Script/Smartform to detail the effect of these date on your print.
    Either by also mentioning these in the item header (remember each item has an unique FZ/ToZ setting). Or by using special markers on the date lines, based on these dates.
    Regards
    JP

  • Final Issue Indicator not set in maitnenance order after ECC 6.0 upgrade

    Hi,
    We encounter this problem after upgrading to ECC6.0 from SAP R/3 4.6C
    Final issue indicator (RESBD-KZEAR) is not being set in maintenance order (IW33) for sub-component non-stock items in General Data page
    Would be great if anyone could guide in this regard
    Detailed Scenario:
    1) Maintenance Order is created (IW31) is created in plant A
    2) For non-stock items, reservation created by maintenance order creates a purchase requisition
    3) Account Assigned STO (against maintenance order) is created from purchase requisition
    4) Transfer Posting done from Plant B (351 movement) for complete qty
    5) GR at Plant A done (101 movement) for complete qty.
    6) Final Issue Indicator is not set in General Data page eventhough the complete quantity is delivered.
    Thanks
    Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 8:59 PM
    Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:00 PM
    Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:03 PM

    Hi,
    Please check in the STO if the "Delivery completed" indicator is checked or not?
    If Yes, then search some correction notes of SAP and get it implemented or raise OSS message with SAP to get the Final Issue indicator to be set in maintenance order.
    If No, then ask your MM consultants to investigate that. They can check the config of "Goods Receipt" Or check if the total quantity GR has been done Or some Under delivery/ Over delivery tolerance has been maintained.
    Thanx.
    Nilmoni.

  • Deletion indicator not working after user exit error

    Hi Gurus,
    I had one requirement in Purchase Requisition. If the number of items increase by 36 , there should be an error saying that maximum items reached but once that item is deleted that error should disappear.
    I have written the coding in an Exit: EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_010.
    And the coding is :
    IF gs_eban-bsart = gcz902.
    LOOP AT gt_eban INTO gs_eban
    where loekz is initial.
    LOOP AT gt_ebkn INTO gwa_ebkn WHERE banfn = gs_eban-banfn
    and bnfpo IN r_bnfpo.
    recherche division- ordre interne
    LOOP AT ot_div into gwa_div WHERE ot = gwa_ebkn-aufnr AND div = gwa_ebkn-bnfpo.
    ENDLOOP.
    IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    gwa_div-ot = gwa_ebkn-aufnr.
    gwa_div-div = gwa_ebkn-bnfpo.
    APPEND gwa_div TO ot_div.
    ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    ENDLOOP.
    DESCRIBE TABLE ot_div LINES n.
    IF n >= 37.
    case sy-ucomm.
    WHEN 'MESAVE'.
    MESSAGE e111(zpfr) with n.
    exit.
    ENDCASE.
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    So now the exit is working fine......but when i go to delete that extra item it is not getting deleted , so while saving the information message comes that no data changed.
    So ho wto delete that extra item.
    Do anyone have reply....
    thanks in advance.

    Hello.
    If you insert 37 lines you get your error message. But if you delete 1 row, you get error message again, right?
    I think that's because you are not refreshing internal table ot_div. Shouldn't you refresh it before LOOP AT gt_eban INTO gs_eban?
    Regards.
    Valter Oliveira.

  • Final Invoice indicator not set for limt PO though same done in SRM system

    Hi,
    We are closing Standard and Limit PO through a program in SRM system. For standard PO it's working fine (the Final Invoice flag in ERP system is set checked with WBS element blocked), however when it come to Limit PO, it's giving an error message and not updating Final Invoice flag for the same WBS element though we have updated the final invoice flag in BBP_PDIGP as well as BBP_PDLIM tables in SRM system through the program.
    Regards,
    Ni3

    Hi,
    The error message I am getting is "User status LFI is active (WBS E.000804.02.02)" where in standard PO the same WBS is referred still the PO is getting closed.
    PS: I do not wish to create any customization.
    Regards,
    Ni3

  • ME52N: Determine if restore delete indicator is set from user exit

    Hi all,
    My most recent dilemma involves tcode ME52n. I want to restore a line item that has been deleted on a purchase requisition. When I drop into my user exit I want to test to see if the user is attempting to restore the deleted line item...how do I do that? It seems if I use the okcode for the screen I am picking up the save...
    As always...thanks in advance,
    Mat

    Hi all,
    My most recent dilemma involves tcode ME52n. I want to restore a line item that has been deleted on a purchase requisition. When I drop into my user exit I want to test to see if the user is attempting to restore the deleted line item...how do I do that? It seems if I use the okcode for the screen I am picking up the save...
    As always...thanks in advance,
    Mat

  • Production Order Deletion Indicator - Reversal

    PP Experts,
    We have set the deletion indicator on our production orders, now we need to undo the  deletion indicator on some.  Is it possible to remove the deletion indicator, not the deletion flag, but the deletion indicator.
    Barry

    Hi Barry Nelson,
    Well the most important thing is every body said and again i am repeating we can not revesal the deletion indicator for a production order.
    Mainly Deletion Indicator is used to reduce the old order data stored in the SAP system when ever they come to conclusion there is no use OK.
    Activating Deletion Flag means you are deleting from Tables as well OK. Once the data is deleted from tables means you can not find any information of the order OK.
    It will also increases the system performance as well.
    I hope it helps you any questions pop me again.
    Regards,
    Madhu.G

  • Preventing Deletion indicator in PR once work order is completed

    Dear colleagues,
    Users create work orders in IW31 with the choice of external service; control key is PM02. Once work order is saved purchase requisition (PR) is created in background. With reference to PR, purchase order (PO) is created by purchase specialist.
    When work order is technically completed (system status TECO) deletion indicator is set to PR line item(s) automatically which result in undesirable situations since PR(s) has subject to release strategy in our system.
    Is it possible to prevent setting deletion indicator in PR once reference work order is technically completed?
    Kind regards
    Melih

    Hi,
    In this case that behavior has negative effects on PR Workflow process because in our system when PR(s) is created it is subject to release strategy according to preconfigured conditions.
    Once the order is technically completed (TECO) deletion indicator is set to PR line item(s) automatically meanwhile release strategy tab is disappeared from PR line item(s).
    In addition to that in ME54N system gives the MEPO822 (Purchase requisition XXXXXXXXX cannot be released) message even PR is approved before the order is technically completed.
    Kind regards
    Melih

  • Error Message "Delete price or set "Invoice Expected Indicator" in PO.

    Hi Gurus,
    We are in extended classic scenario with version 5.0.
    We are getting error message "Delete price or set "Invoice Expected Indicator" when we are releasing the PO from Release PO option.
    We are getting this error message in below situation:
    We created shopping carts without vendor then after approval PO gets created in "Held status". When we edit the PO & add vendor then system gives error message "Delete price or set "Invoice Expected Indicator" (Line 1).
    In this case the invoice expected indicator is not sets when we add vendor in the PO but if we create Shopping cart with vendor & when PO create din that case the invoice expected indicator is automatialy comes.
    Can any one please help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Manish
    Edited by: Manish Mamidwar on Jul 30, 2010 5:40 PM

    Hi All,
    I have the same problem, Delete price or set "Invoice Expected Indicator" in PO
    I have an Item Position of the PO that is Limit of Liability and for this position type I will not make invoice, then I would like remove the flag of invoice execution, but a recived your same message, can you tell me how did you resolve this problem?
    Kind regards
    Valentina Mari
    Edited by: Fuffo Fuffi on Nov 10, 2010 12:51 PM

  • Set deletion indicator in purchase requisition account assignment

    Hi Guys,
    Can you please help we with the solution to set deletion indicator in purchase requisition account assignment or close purchase requisition. A purchase requisition of $3.600.000,00 was created through Project system Network-External Processing and it has 2 duplicate network activities and $2.246.577,20 was converted to purchase order then $1,353,423 became the network remaining order plan. A purchase order service entry sheet was accepted and the invoice was created. Now Iu2019m experiencing problem when Iu2019m trying to change WBS element and Network system status to TECO in order to remove the remaining order plan of $1,353,423. Iu2019m getting error message number:06411 the procedure I have follow to correct the error is to reduce quantities in the account assignment item and delete superfluous account assignment by setting deletion in each case but I cannot do that because the fields are grey
    Regards
    Sandile

    Hi,
    please check first if the report ZMO_CORRECT_EBKN  from note 739004  can correct the problem.
    I would like to recommend you to check also the note 796973 whether the correction is avalilable in your coding, it should solve the issue.
    In case the problem still persists, please open a ticket to get help from the primary support in area MM-SRV.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Issue with setting deletion indicator in PR

    Hi ,
    For a certain sales order, a dummy Purchase Requisition was created and the delivery was also created.
    There was an existing logic in exit  MV50AFZ1  to set the deletion indicator in PR when PGI has been done.
    But when the Goods Issue was done by another user id , Purchase Requistion does not have the delivery indicator set ,as this user ID has no authorization to ME52N.
    Users want to surpass this check for all users who have authorization for Goods Issue , i.e, when any user who has authorization for Goods Issue does the PGI, then the deletion indicator should be set in PR, irrespective of whether he has/has no authorization for ME52N.
    How can I achieve this?
    Is there any place where I can check the authorization for ME52N and then use some other id for PGI so that deletion indicator is automatically set?
    Awaiting response.
    Thanks,
    Neethu

    Thanks Chericheri
    So my code now reads MODIFY <internal table> FROM <work area> INDEX <table control>-current_line transporting <deletion indicator field>.
    Edited by: Brett Cunliffe on Sep 22, 2011 4:44 PM

  • Table EKKO-LOEKZ Delete Indicator can't be changed once set

    Hi Gurus:
    We ran Archive Object MM_EKKO Preprocessing Program RM06EV70.  This set the deletion indicator EKKO-LOEKZ to an 'L' on 2008 Purchase Orders.  It was discovered that around 100 really can't be archived.   On this Forum we were told that SAP Tcode MEMASSPO can change LOEKZ back to blank.  Our SCM Team tried that but we get  error messages that the PO can't be changed and  that Purchasing document 6200000617 already archived.  
    Does anyone know what we are doing wrong or another way to set LOEKZ back to blank?
    Thank you
    Dennis

    Hi Jurgen:
    I use Tcode MEMASSPO.
    I select fields on Purchase Order Header.  I select the deletion indicator MASSEKKO-LOEKZ on the list.
    I enter a PO Number with an 'L' in the LOEKZ field from the preprocessor.
    I change the new value field to  blank on the PO Header.  I hit the mass change button.   The 'L' is changed to a  blank. 
    I hit the save icon.   I get all of the following errors.
    6200000617 : Instance 6200000617 of object type PurchaseOrder could not be changed
    6200000617 : Instance 6200000617 of object type PurchaseOrder could not be changed
    6200000617 : Purchasing document 6200000617 already archived.
    If we do this for a PO that was not set to a 'L' by the preproessor program.  We can change it to using MEMASSPO to 'L' (SAP Changes it to 'C' and we can blank it out again. 
    I don't think there is anyway to get MEMASSPO to change the PO.  Any ideas?

  • FM for setting deletion indicator BNKA

    Hello Experts,
    is a function module available to set the deletion indicator (field LOEVM) of each entry in table BNKA?
    In that case the change documents will be updated automatically.
    Best regards
    Phillip

    Hi,
    Check this one
    BANK_MARK_FOR_DELETION
    If the indicator I_REAL is set to 'X', the function module sets the deletion flag in the table BNKA for those banks which are not marked as current.
    Edited by: Selva M on Oct 20, 2009 4:07 PM

  • Set deletion indicator on unsuccessful RFQs

    Dear Everyone,
    Essentially, the criteria for marking the deletion indicator in unsuccessful RFQs are:
    1/ quotations are not maintained for these RFQs; net price is zero.
    2/ deadline for the submission of the quotation had expired. The fields EKPO-MAHN1, EKPO-MAHN2 & EKPO-MAHN3 are also verified to see if reminders are required to be sent after the quotation deadline. If required, then the RFQs are not appropriate candidates for now.
    3/ if the above criteria is met, a further verification check is made amongst the RFQs with the same collective number to see if any of the RFQs are having quotations maintained, that is, the net price is not zero. One of the quotations (having the same collective number and accepted by the business) will have a quotation comment of “AB1’ or ‘AB2’ and this will be used as a basis for rejecting (updating the rejection indicator) the rest.
    4/ a report program is preferred. It should have key selection criteria like Quotation deadline [select-options], RFQ # [selection-options], quotation deadline [parameter], collective number [parameter – * wildcard acceptable],
    Could anybody please provide solution for this will be appreciated?
    Thanks in advance
    Ravi

    Dear,
    The system sets this status when you release the order, provided that the Order record required indicator is set in the order type-dependent parameters (see Customizing for Process Order)....
    This setting is there in SPRO....
    Production Planning for Process Industries - Process Order-Master Data-Order-Define Order type Dependent parameters...
    In this you set the option Order record Required....
    Requirements are that the process orders are settled, associated PI sheets, inspection lots and any linked purchase orders are complete.
    Following are prerequisites for closing a process order
    1 The order must have the status Released (REL) or Technically completed (TECO)
    2 The order balance must be 0
    3 There can be no open purchase requisitions, purchase orders.
    4 There can be no future change records from confirmation processes.
    .Now Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
    CO43 - Collective Processing
    Step to be follow,
    1.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
    KKAO - Collective Processing
    2.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
    KKS1 - Collective Processing
    3.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
    CO88 - Collective Processing
    Please refer this thread also,
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=17422319&messageID=5934846
    The transaction COA5 (Archive Administration Preprocessing).
    This will allow you to set the deletion flag
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Tcode KKF6N Setting Deletion Indicator

    Hi ,
    When we try to set the deletion indicator for a material in Tcode KKF6N we get an error : "The balance on object ORDER NO.... is not zero.That is there is still costs on the object."
    I have tried variance calculation but returns saying no variances.
    Any suggestions ?
    Thanks
    Kartik

    Also check your settlement profile. 
    In our discrete orders, the settlement profile is set to "must be setttled" meaning the balance MUST be zero.  On some order that are simply "wrong" or very old and we don't want the numbers from previos FY to settle in current year, we change the indicator to "CAN BE settled" set the DLFL and thne change the indicator back.   
    Some issue are just too old or too wrong to fight through the correction - a journal entry is written to correct the GL and the order is set to DLFL
    Hope this is helpful.
    Althea

Maybe you are looking for

  • Macbook Pro to Samsung LCD TV

    I'm trying to hook up a MacBook Pro to a Samsung LCD TV (Model: LE40A656A1FXXU) but when I connected it up the message on the screen was something along the lines of 'mode not supported'. Can someone tell me what I need to do? Currently I'm using the

  • Syncing issues between Macbook Air and Ipad

    Hi. I have an iPad 3 and the new Macbook Air. I am using the latest versions on both my devices.  When i connect my ipad via the cable it connects and disconnects immediately, and this keeps on happening again and again and again. I have tried both t

  • DML Error logging table in Set base mode

    Hi all, In ETL data errors can be handled thru error logging table. Like this example given in the document- INSERT /*+ APPEND PARALLEL */ INTO sales SELECT product_id, customer_id, TRUNC(sales_date), 3, promotion_id, quantity, amount FROM sales_acti

  • IOS 8 is slow on my iPad 3

    Just loaded iOS 8 on my iPad 3. I like the new features. But it's really slowing down my iPad. I really notice it on webpages. But applications are slow to load as well.anyone have any ideas on how to improve this other than buying the most recent iP

  • Why does Bridge keep locking up?

    I cannot use PS Bridge CC....a window comes up saying that I must purge the cache in preferences...each time I try to purge the system locks up.  What can I do?