Delivery costs in net value

Dear experts,
I have created a calculation scheme with which I want to inlude freight costs in the net value of a purchase order.
When creating a purchase order (ME21N), I can already see the freight costs in the net subtotal. But the net value of the purchase order is still the net value of the info record.
Can anybody help me to include the freight costs of the purchase order into the net value?
Cheers
Carsten

Hi Andra,
thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately the net value is still the net value of the info record and not equal to the net subtotal.
From my understanding, there should be a way to add this subtotal to KOMP-NETWR, shouldn't?
Cheers
Carsten

Similar Messages

Automatic settlement of delivery costs MRDC for service PO

Hi,
We configured a custom condition type ZCOM (Commission). This condition was assigned to pricing procedure RM0000. This condition is defined as a delivery cost condition with accrual.
PO for non-inventory material:
- Free text item for 10 EA @ $100/EA
- ZCOM condition added at the item level for 10% ($100). Vendor in this condition is different that PO vendor.
- GR for 1 EA
- PO history shows: GR (101) for 1 EA with total value $100. It also shows DCGR for 1 EA in the delivery cost quantity and value $10.
Run automatic delivery cost settlement (MRDC): It created invoice for the freight vendor using the delivery cost amount of $10. In PO history it shows: DCIn for 1 EA in delivery quantity field and amount of $10.
PO for services:
- Free text service for 10 EA @ $100/EA.
- ZCOM condition added at the item level (not at the service level) for 10% (value $100).
- Service entry sheet for 1 EA with value $100
- PO history shows: SEnt for $100. GR (101) for $100. It also shows DCGR for 1 AU in the delivery cost quantity and amount of $10.
Run automatic delivery cost settlement (MRDC): It created invoice for the freight vendor NOT using the delivery cost amount of $10. It created an invoice for the full line item amount of $100. PO history shows: DCIn for 1 AU in delivery quantity field and amount of $100. This is wrong. It should have created the invoice only for $10.
Any help on what is going on it is greatly appreciated.
Thanks and regards, Jose Oyon.

no, SAP does not know this kind of fixed conditions.
even a fixed condition is depended on the quantity, and adjusted to the GR quantity if it differs from PO quantity.

Tax On Unplanned Delivery Cost

Hi Gurus,
I have a scenario. vendor gives invoice on Unloading (when required) which is not included in PO pricing. We treat it as unplanned delivery cost. But service tax is applicable for this unplanned cost.
Although PO contains service tax but during MIRO it is not being applicable to unplanned cost.
Can you suggest how to get rid of this problem???
Regards,
santosh

Hi,
This is standard functionality of SAP.
The logic SAP follows:
(a) Unplanned delivery cost that needs to be posted during invoice verification gets apportioned to the base values of line items considered for invoice verification
(b) Since the Tax is always calculated on the base values of the line items, the tax also calculated on apportioned unplanned delivery cost.
(c) There are no Configuration or User exits available to avoid calculation of tax on unplanned delivery cost.
You can use following workaround solutions to meet your requirement of loading unplanned delivery costs to material value:
(a) Posting unplanned delivery costs directly to Material value. This is achieved by allowing direct posting to Material at MIRO.
(b) Post-unplanned delivery costs as subsequent debit memo using MIRO. Here, you can choose the relevant tax code based on the requirement
(c) The unplanned delivery costs entered at the time of Invoice verification will be posted to separate GL account without calculating taxes on it.
Bye,
Muralidhara

Conditions type of category "Delivery Costs"(B) donu00B4t allow negative values

Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to munipulate a condition type with category "B" Delivery costs in such a way that it allows a negative entry in the Purchase Order.
Estandard SAP does not allow it. Message: 06259 "Negative Delivery costs are not allowed".
If the above is not possible, can anyone tell me how a can manipulate a Discount (fixed amount) in such a way that it not only points at a particlar account (accruels indicator does this job) upon MIGO, but also apears as a line-item upon receiving the invoice (MIRO). As far as I know, only Planned delivery costs can do this job. But they do not allow negative values!
If anyone has encountered a similar task, please tell me how they solved it.
Thanks,
Aart

Hello Guys,
The scenario isas follows.
When one buys fuel, in Chile one has to pay fuel especific Taxes.
Version especific config does not resolve this because we need the tax in amount (value) not in percentage.
In our system we resolved this by creating a material "Fuel especific Taxes" which points at a tax-account with a special tax-indicator.
So far so good.
Now the government implemented a second fuel tax - "Fuel tax variable" which we might resolve in the same way, but the problem is this tax might be negative(!).
We cannot create a material with a "negative value" in our Purchase Order and discount conditions have inmediate efect on the material costs in the PO.
The ideal would be incorporate a condition type in the PO which upon invoicing (MIRO) shows up with the tax account (and a possible negative value!
The model we have developed upto now is using the tabpage "GeneralAccount" in the MIRO but in this model we have to indicate the account ourselves. The system does not propose it.
Thats why I thought of the "Planned Delivery costs" option.
Hope this clarifies a bit more the case we have.
Thanks for any feedback
Aart

Shipment cost(net value) changes in VI02/VI03

hello,
In VI02 or VI03,when I see the shipment costs(net value)for one item has some value say 100 eur.I am double clicking that line item where the shipment cost(net value) will be different value say 10 eur.Once again when I double click that line item,in the next screen i can see condition types with different charges.
now when i come back twice to my first screen, I see that shipment costs(net value) is displayed as 10 eur instead of 100eur.
What may be the reason behind this? Is this Standard SAP functionality?
Regards
goutham

Hello,
I didnot select the button update i just double clicked the line in the Shipment costs item tab where it will take me to the sub-item conditions details.Then if we come back to original screen,price is changed.
Regards
Goutham

Unplanned delivery cost will lead to negative value

Hi everyone,
i have this issue. I m trying to cancel an incoice document from MR8M.When i do that i get a message: No m8281, unplanned delivery cost will lead to negative value.
Can someone help me with this? what do i need to do?
Regards

Hi,
This problem is caused by a program error.
Refer the notes 1377622, 992146
You use transaction MIRO "Enter Incoming Invoice" to enter an invoice that has a reference to a purchase order. Based on your Customizing settings, the unplanned delivery costs are distributed to the individual items.
1. You enter negative unplanned delivery costs on the "Details" tab page. The negative unplanned delivery costs lead to a negative invoice amount.
              The system does not issue error message M8 281 "Unplanned delivery costs will lead to negative value".
              Negative invoice values (EKBE-WRBTR, EKBE-DMBTR) are written in the purchase order history. This results in an error in transaction MCE7 "Material Analysis (PURCHIS): Selection".
2. You post a subsequent credit. You enter unplanned delivery costs on the "Details" tab page. The unplanned delivery costs lead to a negative total invoice amount.
              The system does not issue error message M8 281 "Unplanned delivery costs will lead to negative value".
              The negative total invoice amount (the total of EKBE-WRBTR or EKBE-DMBTR) leads to an unexpected distribution of unplanned delivery costs for the next invoice document.
(SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Incoming Invoice -> Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted)
Other terms
Negative, delivery costs (DLC), bnkan_fw, rewwr, M8 281, rewrt
Reason and Prerequisites
This problem is caused by a program error.
Solution
The Support Package for Releases 4.70, 5.00, 6.00, 6.02, 6.03 and 6.04 corrects this error.
Advance correction: implement the correction instructions.
Header Data

Limiting value for unplanned delivery cost

Hi,
I want to set up a limiting value for unplanned delivery cost ( Say the unplanned delivery cost should not exceed 10% of the total invoice value ).
How to achieve this functionality.
Regards,
R. Dillibabu.

Hello,
There are no checks for unplanned delivery cost and you should explore the possibility of user exits to implement this functionality.
Cheers !

Copy Net Value(VBAK-NETWR) from sales order to Delivery VL02N

Hi all,
Please can anyone help me with this? When the sales order is saved we need to move the net value to the any field in the delivery.
Thanks
Jasmeet

Hi,
This is a standard SAP functionality that values from sales order will be copied to billing and not to delivery.
In fact values from both sales order and delivery are copied to billing.
If you want to copy that you would need to copy the same in some empty field in the delivery document and that too with some BadI or user exit ZE_SHP_TAB_CUST_HEAD.
This user exit will create an additional tab in delivery header and you can copy the pricing value from sales order to any field in this tab.Developer can confirm the same.
Regards
Karan

Unplanned delivery cost picking rounding off value in sap miro

Dear Experts,
I have configured unplanned delivery costs to be posted to separate GL account. I have set the default tax code also. In OBYC i have set the frieght and transportation GL account against UPF transaction key. Now even though the user is not entering any value in unplanned delivery cost field, system is automatically taking the rounding off values(manually entered by user to match the vendor invoice) from MIRO line item and is posting to the freight account.
Query -2 - while reversing the already posted MIRO document in MR8M the rounding of value which has been taken automatically in unplanned delivery cost is showing in the error message as :
"Balance is not equal to zero: 0.35- inr"
please refer below screen shot for the error message
Please suggest.
Regards
Chinmaya

please read my blog it explains how to close a question, just replying "closed" does not do really this job
How to close a discussion and why

Lowest value determination including delivery costs

Hi friends,
is it possible to include delivery costs (as freight costs FRA1 and FRB1) in the lowest value determination MRN0 when comparing order prices as market prices?
Best regards,
Carsten

HI,
I have done this configuration to go to different GL Account
Example --for Freight(Seperate GL Account)
My requirement is
In PO
Material X       100/-    Cost centre-1024
Material Y       200/-    Cost Centre-1025
Invoice is
Material X       100/-
Material Y       200/-
Unplanned Delivery costs 30/-
After Posting MIRO it should come this way...
Material X       100/-   CC-1024
Material Y       200/-   CC-1025
Freight -charges- 10/- CC 1024
Freight -charges-20/- CC-1025
(Freight charges should go to different GL Account and also splitting the costs based on the PO item value)
could you please help me how this can be done.

GR Value without Delivery costs

Hi experts,
We loaded data through 2lis_02_Scl into the standard cube 0pur_c01.
Through some update routine in the update rules the data loaded into the cube for the field " Value of
goods received in local currency ".
When checked in the cube we are getting the value with the "Delivery Costs".
But we want the value without Delivery Costs.
The update routine in the update rules for this field is as follows:
========================
IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '002' or     "WE-Wert
    COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '012' or
    COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '022' )
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-BWAPPLNM EQ 'MM'
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-CPPVLC <> 0.
    RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-CPPVLC.
========================
How to get the value without delivery costs ? What the code i need to write for this ?
Regards,
Bhadri M.

Please ask your functional consultant,
about the condition to differentiate the GR Value and the Delivery Costs the Source System.
Check the movement types or the conditions.
Identify the tables and the field names.
ensure those fields were being populated through our extractor, if not go ahead with enhancing the structure and make a look up on the tables. After populating in the DSO, write a routine to negate the delivery costs.

Planned delivery cost in Import of Assets Materail

Hi,
I have a scenario, where we are purchasing (Import) Assets material from abroad. for this we have created Import PO with account assignment A. assigned the planned delivery cost in Condition Viz. Sea freight, Custom Duty, CHA charges and individual vendor also assigned at condition level.
We have posted the MIRO for Custome Duty and Done the GR. Excise Invoice also Captured and posted. While posting the invoice of other Delivery cost after GR system is not showing any value in MIRO line item.
Where as in normal inport cycle Value in Planned delivery cost IV (after GR) is appearing itself.
Please guide how to Post Delievry cost IV in above scenario. we donot want to enter any amount manual in MIRO line item.
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjan Kumar

Hi Ranjan,
The idea with MIRO is to enter the vendor invoice that you got on paper, i.e. the gross amount, the tax amount(s) and the net item amounts - all from the vendor invoice. For this reason the defaulted amounts shouldn't be necessary.
If your business case is different, then there's a workaround. MIRO only suggests amounts if two cases:
- PO doesn't have provision for GR ("GR" flag on the tab "Delivery") or
- PO does have provision for GR and the received qty up to day is higher than the total invoiced qty up to day.
I have however used a user exit to make MIRO think the GR flag in the PO is not set. The user exit is the enhancement point MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE_01 of the enh. spot ES_SAPLMRMC located right in the beginning of the function MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE. The function module receives the GR flag from the PO in the parameter I_MRM_PROP-WEPOS. Let your enhancement reset the flag and make MIRO believe the GR flag in the PO is not set. Then it will propose the PO qty and amount.
However, let me underline again - the idea with MIRO is that you should type in the invoice that you hold your hand.
BR
Raf

Freight to be calculated based on sales order net value

Hello Experts,
We have got a scenario,
The net value of the sales order is 1194, 13 Euro, the customer has to pay
6,40 Euro freight costs one time for this order. If we donu2019t deliver all items based on backorder or something else, the customer has not to pay for the additional delivery.
These are the general terms and conditions.
The system charges for the additional delivery the freight costs once again
dependent on the net value of the 2. Delivery and so on
In the example :
According to the general terms and condition the customer has to pay for the
order one time with the first invoice -> 6,40 Euro freight cost.
But the system had invoiced for the additional delivery with the invoice ->20, 60 Euro independent of the net value of the additional delivery.
And we have to create a credit note for the customer.
If we have several shipments of one order the system charges the freight costs of each shipment concerning to the net value.
Thanks & Regards,

If we donu2019t deliver all items based on backorder or something else,
the customer has not to pay for the additional delivery.
For this, you can have one header condition type and input manually the value if need be. If you want to automate, then you have to go with adding the required codings to your routine which I feel, will complicate the system.
G. Lakshmipathi

How to return Delivery Costs in a PO?

Hi everyone,
My client has a scenario of vendor return with PO, where we indicate that the PO item is a return item.
The situation I am facing is the following: we create a normal PO, where items have their price + delivery costs. MIGO and MIRO are done perfectly. My problem comes when we have to create a return PO for that item. I do not have the same provision for PO returns, because when we return the item through PO indicator delivery costs can not be included as SAP does not support negative delivery costs. The thing is that returning the item at Purchase Price without consideration of the deliver costs, will result in high WAC. How to resolve this issue.
Could anyone advise on this? Thanks in advance!
Nisha

Hi Nisha,
I have run the scenerio in my test system with return PO.
In this I have considered the net price to be 10 rs out of which .50 rs is frieght (condition type is marked with accrual/statstical in config)
i was able to create PO since the condition type value is coming in positive and its statastical and on doing mIGO system created the material document with the below accounting entries
GR/IR dr for 10 Rs
Stock account credit for 9.5 rs
Frieght account credit for .5 rs
I think this solves the issue
please check the config of the frieght condition type make it statastical

Net value and assesable value

Dear Experts,
In Import pricing procedure we different pricing condition like
1.PACKING AND FORWARDING
2. SUPPLIER INSURANCE
3. OCCAN/ AIR FRIGHT CHARGES
4.IMPORT INSURANCE
5. LANDING CHARGES
to obtain NET VALUE which are pricing condiion value has to added
Please tell me what is difference between Net VALUE and ASSESABLE VALUE,
THIS

Hi,
Net value is basic material price with includes all delivery cost & fright.
Asseable value is
Basic price (% of material value) depent on product & chapter ID. (Custom will provide abetment for product)
Fright (Import)
Insurence cost
Landing cost 1%
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jun 9, 2010 4:19 PM

Delivery costs in net value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for