Delivery unit in material master should appear on item level of delivery

Dear SD Sales and Delivery experts,
i would appreciate your support very much!!!
We want to implement the following small functionality:
The components concerned are material master, order and delivery item.
The material master is maintained in folder <Sales: Sales Org1> in the field "Delivery Unit" e.g. with 10 PC 
If the customer orders 20 pieces, but the existent stock just has got e.g. 13, the nightly delivery batch (VL10) should not deliver the amount of existent stock of 13 pc but should - e.g. after implementing a coded functionality - compare the 20 pc that have been transferred from order into delivery with 13 on stock and then rounds off to the next lower delivery step of 10 after looking up in the material master in folder <Sales: Sales Org1> in the field "Delivery Unit" maintained with 10 pc. These 10 pc should appear on item level of the delivery so that they can be shipped. Open amount of ten will be handled when the stock of this material had been filled up.
Same procedure within an another example:
Customer orders 57 pc - Stock has 39 pc = delivery should post 30 pc
I found the User Exit MV50AFZ1 but the steps in there seem to be to early.
Are there any BADIs wie can use?
Copy Control with Routines and Conditions?
Many Thanks in advance
Stephan Sislian

Hi,
I never tried, but did you check the field rounding profile in the material master Sales: sales org1 tab - under quantity stipulations?
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • How to change material discription at sales order item level ?

    Dear Gurus,
            We have some requirement need to change material description at sales order item level , but in system it is in disable mode how to change that  into change mode in sales order item level?
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Venkat

    Not possible in SAP Standard.
    Instead why not create a Customer Material Info Record in T-Code - VD51?
    Alternatively it the requirement to change the Description is only for few Sales Order then create a Text ID & Enter the Description in Text Feild. Then in Smartform program wrie a code which will check for Material Description in the Text first & if not found then take from normal material Description in Sales Order.
    But Customer Material info Record seems to be the best solution.
    Hope this helps,
    Thanks,
    Jignesh Mehta

  • Order quantity equals to delivery unit in material master

    Dear All,
    I have below requirement regarding Delivery unit (MVKE-SCMNG).
    My requirement is that whatever unit has been maintained in material master in Delivery unit, system shall not allow to create sales order of quantity which is more or less than the delivery unit.
    Meaning, system shall only allow to create sales order of quantity equals to the quantity maintained in the material master in delivery unit.
    Kindly let me know if any user exit(s) available for the same.
    Waiting for your valuable reply.
    Thanks,
    Ritesh

    Hi Ritesh,
    This is very much possible using user exit, MV45AFZZ in FORM userexit_save_document.
    Other option would be in MV45AFZB FORM USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAP, you can check that this qty in material master if unequal to ordered qty you can give a pop-up to user that 'The qty is being changed to xx' as soon as the user presses enter as the user would know about it.
    in MV45AFZZ, the user would know only after saving and would be able to see in VA03 after the document is created.
    Regards,
    RS.

  • Order unit in material master

    Hi Gurus,
    We have maintained order unit CS in material master, while creating purchase order we have changed the order unit CS to BAG. conversion was not maintained for BAG in material master.
    But still PO is not throwing any error message. In actual it should give error message ..right ? as we  have changed the order unit CS to BAG?
    Please clarify
    subbu

    Hello,
    If that Unit & its conversion wrt to base unit is niether maintained in Material master or nor in inforecord, then, system throws an error. Please check whether "BAG" is maintaiened in material master or inforecord. Also check message setting.
    Hope it will help u..
    Thanks
    Subhash

  • Restrict material master information at the field level

    We have a requirement to restrict change access to certain material master fields, meaning everyone may be able to view the data but not change it.  Beyond that, those people who are allowed to change the data can only change certain fields...other people can change other fields (on the same material master view).  For instance a simple example would be that someone might have access to change the material description on the basic view but not the material group.  Someone else might have access to change the material group but not the description.  (Again, this is just a scenario that I'm using as an example, not as a real live case.)
    Is it even possible to do this?  I'm guessing it's not but I thought I'd ask the "experts" here before I deliver the bad news to our users.
    Thanks!

    Thank you for the information but I was aware of using screen sequence and field selection however how can I use this to allow certain users access to certain fields but not others.
    For example in the Basic view I want one set of users for the same exact material to be able to change the Base of Unit Measure while the other user can only view this field but not change it however this user can change the other fields in the Basic view.  This sounds like a solution for all fields for a particular materials.  I need to be assign fields within a view to different users.

  • Delivery address appearing at Item level and not at Header level in PO

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing an issue as described below:-
    We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
    After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
    automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
    POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
    PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
    inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
    As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
    address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
    for all the Item Levels.
    However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
    PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
    address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
    is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    RKS

    HI Paul,
    Thank you for your response.In our case even if all the Line/items level have same Plant and storage location still the delivery address is getting printed at Item level and not at Header Level and this is happening only for PO's created from PR's orginating from SRM7.0.
    However if we create PR's directly in R/3 and then convert them into PO's,the delivery address is getting printed at the Header level if the delivery address is same for all the Item level.
    Can you plz some insite into this?
    Your help will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    RKS

  • Condition tab is not appearing at item level in CRM 5.0 IDES

    Hi,
    I am trying to create Sample order in CRM ides but condition view at header level is blank and at item level condition view is not appearing.
    I have maintained condition record for condition types and it is visible in Material master. And correct pricing procedure is picked in sample order as I can see this in Header overview.
    I checked pricing procedure its correct. What else I need to check?
    Thanks for your reply.
    Nishith

    Hi Nishith,
    You can check if the item category is pricing relevant - field PRICING_RELEVANT in view CRMV_SALES_ITEM.
    Hope this helps,
    Kind regards,
    Vanessa

  • Wrong Gross Weight for Material in Sales Order at Item Level (Shipping Tab)

    Dear All,
    Except MMR, where we maintain gross weight for material?
    Or, from where Gross weight gets detrmined in Sales Order at item level (Shipping Tab)?
    Details,
    I've 2 Materials in Sales Order, Mat1 and Mat2.
    In both the MMRs, Gross weight is 1.080 Kg
    In sales Order Mat1 has Qty 18,000 Kg and gross weight is 19,440 Kg --> which is right.
    Mat2 has Qty 2,160 Kg and gross weight is 2,332,800 Kg --> which is wrong.
    I tried with maintaing another line item with Mat2 in Sales Order, for which again wrong gross weight is calculated.
    I also tried with creating another Sales Order with Mat2, and again the same problem.
    Thanks for your help, in advance.
    Regds,
    Yogi.

    Hi,
    Thanks. That has already been checked by me, in Basic data1 --> Additional Data --> Unit of measurements
    everything is maintained correctly.
    What I have noticed is:
    Instead of obtaining Gross weight as 1.080 (which is maintained), somehow system is picking 1,080 (don't know why and from where)?
    Regds,
    yogi

  • Flag Material master for deletion at plant level using MM17

    Hello Everybody,
    Here is the issue.
    We are trying to flag materials for deletion using MM17.
    When we try to set deletion flag at client level everything looks good.
    But when we try to set deletion flag at plant level we are getting the following error message.
          Messages have been issued: number MASS172234000587
          Message no. MK101
          Diagnosis
          During inbound processing for the IDoc, messages have arisen while checking material data.
          System Response
          The system has filed these messages in the form of an application log with the number        
    Any thoughts..
    Regards
    Pravin

    If you get such red message in MM17, then you can select it and click the button for detail.
    This will get you into the application log where you can review the detailed error cases.
    Alternative, you can access the log with transaction SLG1, enter as object: MASS and as sub object: BUS1001
    Execute.
    Double click the message text "Messages have been issued: number MASS172234000587
    You get a pop-up from where you can disply the application log (hyperlink Execute at the very end of the text)

  • No delivery expediter for PO item without material master

    Hello gurus,
    when I create a PO with an item without material master (just user-defined text), my system does not create a delivery expediter in ME91F, although the delivery is overdue. When I use a material master in the item, the expediter is created just fine.
    Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong here?
    Thanks
    Alicia

    Hi,
    Check in ME22N, under "Delivery" Tab whether following is maintained
    Reminder 1
    Reminder 2
    Reminder 3
    If not then maintain ad if you want it to come automatically in PO then check in SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Material Master > Entry Aids for Items Without a Material Master > Here assign the Purchasing Value Key to the material group
    It will start picking it for this material group for Text PO also.

  • Ordering unit in Purchasing  the Material master

    Dear all,
    We have 2 material codes for same material e.g.
    1.  ABC ---  having Base unit 'EA' & no ordering unit defined in the master. stock - 100nos
    2. PQR ---  having base unit 'EA' , but ordering unit is 'KG' in the purchasing view. +  additinal data - Unit of measure is defined as 1 EA = 1 EA  &  1 KG = 1 EA. stock -60kg.
    Both materials having stock in the system. We want to use 'PQR' code only.
    How to issue PQR material in 'EA'  against production order ?
    It is coming in  'KG' unit.
    Have I to remove/change ordering unit in additional data ?
    i.e.  e.g. 1KG = 400 EA.

    How to issue PQR material in 'EA' against production order ?
    It is coming in 'KG' unit.
    unit for goods issue is an extra unit and has nothing to do with order unit.
    You can change/remove the goods issue unit in material master storage location view
    Have I to remove/change ordering unit in additional data ?
    i.e. e.g. 1KG = 400 EA.
    select the alternative unit and click the button for line deletion below  the overview

  • Error message during Base unit change in material master

    Hi
    I am getting error message " Independent requirements are already assigned to the
    material" when doing change in base unit in material master.
    But I do not find any independent requiement for the plant in t code MD04.
    Can anybody help me to get a solution for this?
    Thanks in advance
    Pradipta Sahoo

    Hi
    Thaks for your reply.
    I checked in MD63 and don't find any entry. That makes me suprprise why the error shows as an independent requirement entry exists.
    Please reply if you can further help me in this matter to solve this.
    Kind regards
    Pradipta Sahoo

  • Mass maintainenance of material master for the field MARC-NCOST,SOBSK

    Hi
    While maintaining two fields NCOST and SOBSK for hude materials using MM17 transaction, the transaction executed properly while saving the transaction. There is no warning and error messages for all materials. But it was not updated in material master or in tables. for other field relavent to MRP updated correctly.
    when I am maintaining manually for each material it is taking the value update the same.
    Please explain the problem why it was not updating and let me know the solution.
    Regards
    Kishore

    Hi,
    Thanks for ur response.
    I am getting green light. Please note the application message given below.
    "The material cannot be maintained since no maintainable data transferred
    Message no. MG160
    Diagnosis
    You wanted to maintain an existing material master record as follows:
    By changing it
    However, you have not yet maintained the material master record for the organizational levels and data fields specified, or user departments selected. You can therefore process this data only in Create mode.
    By extending it
    However, you have already fully created the material master record for the organizational levels and data fields specified, or user departments selected. You can therefore process this data only in Change mode.
    In both cases, this message can appear if there is no maintainable user department left. This occurs if you have not set the Check required fields indicator when transferring data (program RMDATIND). Although the absence of an entry in required fields does not then necessarily result in an error, the number of maintainable user departments is reduced accordingly.
    Procedure
    Depending on the cause, maintain the material master record in Create or Change mode, or also transfer the missing required fields."
    where can I find IDoc list for this transaction.
    Regards
    Kishore

  • Excise Tab in GR for PO without material master

    Hi all,
    while creating GR for PO without material master, when we tick Item OK, excise tab is appearing. SO user has to select No excise Entry from Excise header tab, which user dont want to do as its not having any excise duy. So can anyone tell me what may be the reason that this tab is coming.  As that vendor some times provide materials which is having excise duty, so we need to maintain it in Vendor Excise details in J1ID. Any solution for this?
    Regards

    As you have maintained vendor excise details in J1ID, excise tab is getting reflected in MIGO.
    Select 'No excise entry' & post GR which you are currently doing.
    Regards,
    Piyush

  • How to know the extended views of a material in Material Master

    Hello SAPients.
    I need to create a report listing the views that a material has extended, something like this:
    <b>Material |Basic Data View |Sales View |Purchasing View</b>
    123456   |Yes             |No         |No
    The question is: Do you know if SAP has a table where it records the views that a material has extended?
    Thank you in advance for your help

    Hope this`ll help you ...
    Here`s FM too...
    MATERIAL_TABLES
    DE PSTAT_D
    Text
    Maintenance status
    Use
    The maintenance status records:
    Which user departments may maintain a material master record of a particular material type
    Which user departments have already maintained the material master record at a particular hierarchy level
    The overall maintenance status is made up of the individual maintenance statuses. The individual maintenance statuses have the following meaning:
    User department Maintenance status
    Work scheduling A
    Accounting B
    Classification C
    MRP D
    Purchasing E
    Production resources/tools F
    Costing G
    Basic data K
    Storage L
    Forecasting P
    Quality management Q
    Warehouse management S
    Sales V
    Plant stocks X
    Storage location stocks Z
    Finding Information for Extending Material Master Records Which User Departments Need to Extend a Material Master Record?
    In the Material Master menu, choose Other ® Extend material view(s).
    The initial screen appears.
    Enter the material number and choose Execute.
    An overview appears of the user departments (indicated by the maintenance status) that still need to extend the material master record.
    Select the user department(s) for which you want to enter data, and choose Maintain materials.
    The first user department screen appears, where you can enter your data.
    Save your data.
    The initial screen for maintaining material master data appears because you have not finished maintaining the material master record. To access the next screen you selected in the overview, choose Enter.
    Repeat step 4 until you have entered all the data for the material and have returned to the overview.
    Which Material Master Records Does a User Department Need to Extend?
    In the Material Master menu, choose Other ® Extend material view(s).
    The initial screen appears.
    In the Maintenance status field, enter the indicator for the user department concerned.
    You can also define other selection criteria, such as the date created, organizational levels, material type, and so on. The system selects those records that satisfy all your selection criteria. If you want the system to select those records that satisfy one of your selection criteria, set the relevant indicator.
    Choose Execute.
    An overview appears of the materials that your user department still needs to extend.
    Select the materials whose data you want to extend and choose Maintain materials.
    The user department screen appears for the first material you selected.
    Enter and save your data.
    The data screen for the next material appears.
    Repeat step 4 until you have entered your data for all the materials and have returned to the overview.
    Thanks
    Message was edited by: Saquib Khan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Firefox stops responding only fix is to reboot tablet

    So, I have firefox 16.02 for android on my samsung galaxy 10.1 tablet. Lately I have noticed that I will open the browser and tell it to go to a site(doesn't matter what site) and all it does is sit there doing nothing, It also doesn't let me click o

  • Sorting Problem in FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL Table

    Hi, FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL Table storing the record FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL_N1(MENU_ID,PROMPT,LANGUAGE) wise in R12. But whereas in 11i, records stored FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL_U1(MENU_ID,ENTRY_SEQUENCE,LANGUAGE). I am confused, whether i need to recreate the in

  • Content server on a VPS - yes or no ?

    Hi, im looking at the following scenario for a DRM encryption and hosting service for a client of mine: short term: serving 150 books per year with 5000 copies each long term: serving 1000 books per year with 20,000 copies per book per year. i'm a fr

  • Update to 28 and the checking compatibility just does not stop

    fire fox does not start the checking thing keeps running

  • Purchase of appliances on backorder

    On August 26, I purchased a washer and dryer in store and was told that both items were currently on backorder and would not be available for delivery until after September 21. Since it was an in-store purchase, I was not sure if there was a way I co