Delta issues between two DSO's

This issue has been a recurrent one over past years, so maybe someone can explain me what is happening here:
The case is always the same, i.e. I try to load a delta from one DSO into another one. Let's call them DSO1, and DSO2. More in detail, the case is as follows:
1. I get an error when loading DSO1 to DSO2, due to some characteritic value's checks that I have implemented in a start routine.
2. I delete the red request from DSO2, and manually delete the wrong entryfrom DSO1.
3. I reload (full) the deleted records into DSO1, with the corrected values.  At the end I check that my data into DSO1 is correct, and that the wrong record has gone.
4. I then reload a delta from DSO1 into DSO2, but I still get the same wrong record transferred, even if the record does not exist anymore in DSO1 !!
My guess is therefore that the data for deltas is fully saved in separate tables, instead of being compared at runtime. Does anyone know if my assumption is correct...If yes, how can I find this table? Is there anything I can do to solve this issue?

The error is not very important...I have implemented a check so that a field is never transferred empty. The field is not empty anymore in the source DSO,  but it still exists in the change log table...Can I do something about it?
With other words: Can I force the change log to be recreated as the difference between my two DSO's, instead as a package of changed records...?
Edited by: TTBBRR on Mar 22, 2010 1:43 PM

Similar Messages

  • Delta broken between two DSO ??

    Hello,
    We are on BI 7.0.
    We have copied our productive system into our develoment system in order to have refresh datas. But since this copy with a big problem in our development system : one DTP on delta is broken between two DSO.
    I Try to reactivate any objects (DTP, DSO, transformation...). Nothing ! Then I delete all datas in target DSO and relaunch an init with same DTP in delta ! all data are correctly transfered in target DSO, but when I add new datas in source DSO, it's impossible to load them into target DSO with same DTP : "no more data avaible "
    Could you help me ? In our system we have severals DTP in delta between DSO, and there are correct ! only this one is broken.

    Hi Eric,
    When a system is refreshed all the data sources and other DTPs  might  show the refreshing system details.
    BASIS would be running BDLS job to change those entries and point correctly the Source system.
    After refresh there are many possibilities that the INITs would be corrupted.
    Check with your BASIS team whether BW relevant post refresh jobs are completed or not?
    Thanks & Regards.
    Ganesh Thota.

  • Comparasions of records between two dsos  using abap program

    Hello Experts,
                           As per my business requirements we Implemented  30 DSO (EDW Layer) for x Reason  with the reference from  Y Reason DSOs. and for x reson dso we created  transformations and dtp. through process chains we loaded the data to X Reason Dsos. after loading i want to comare these two dso records through  ABAP Progrm.
    here my source is : X Region Dsos
    here Trget is        :  Y Region Dsos
    these two are the mandatory fields
    and the optional fields are:
    1. Sales org
    2. Sales division
    3. document creation date.
      for this type of requirement i want to implement  ABAP Program.i want to abap code for this type of requirement. anyone  have abap code for similar type of requirement please send the abap code.
    Thanks & Regards,

    Hi saurabh,
    If your requirement if to comepare both the values based on the sales org, sales div, data, u can build a report or if you want to look up the both the DSO and want to perform any operation we need to write routine at transforamation level.
    I'm sending u a sample code where i had used for look up two ods and delete the exisitng saled docs.in the BI.
    DATA : BEGIN OF i_uxxx OCCURS 0,
           /bic/zaw        LIKE    /bic/aZD_UDLIT00-/bic/zaw,
           END OF i_uxxx.
    DATA : wa_udlit LIKE i_uxxxt.
    DATA : BEGIN OF i_uxxxx OCCURS 0,
           /bic/zaw        LIKE    /bic/aZD_UDAN00-/bic/zaw,
           END OF i_udxxx.
    DATA : wa_uxxxx LIKE i_uxxx.
    case 1 : For uxxxx lite data
    CLEAR i_uxxx.
        DATA: wa_srcpack  TYPE  tys_sc_1,
              zindex      TYPE  sy-tabix.
        BREAK-POINT.
    CLEAR: zindex.
        SELECT /bic/zaw
        FROM  /bic/aZD_UDLIT00
        INTO  TABLE i_uxxx.
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN SOURCE_PACKAGE
        WHERE /bic/zaw  = SOURCE_PACKAGE-/bic/zcustomer.
        LOOP AT SOURCE_PACKAGE INTO wa_srcpack.
          zindex = sy-tabix.
          CLEAR wa_xxx.
          READ TABLE i_uxxx INTO wa_uxxx
                               WITH KEY /bic/zaw = wa_srcpack-/bic/zcustomer
          IF sy-subrc = 0.
            Delete SOURCE_PACKAGE.
          ENDIF.
       MODIFY SOURCE_PACKAGE INDEX zindex FROM wa_srcpack.
        CLEAR: zindex.
        ENDLOOP.
    *case 2 : For uxxxx data
    CLEAR i_uxxxx.
        DATA: wa_srcpack1  TYPE  tys_sc_1,
              zindex1      TYPE  sy-tabix.
        BREAK-POINT.
    CLEAR: zindex1.
        SELECT /bic/zaw
        FROM  /bic/aZD_UDAN00
        INTO  TABLE i_uxxxx
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN SOURCE_PACKAGE
        WHERE /bic/zaw  = SOURCE_PACKAGE-/bic/zcustomer.
        LOOP AT SOURCE_PACKAGE INTO wa_srcpack1.
          zindex1 = sy-tabix.
          CLEAR wa_uxxx.
          READ TABLE i_uxxxx INTO wa_uxxx
                               WITH KEY /bic/zaw =
                               wa_srcpack1-/bic/zcustomer
          IF sy-subrc = 0.
            Delete SOURCE_PACKAGE.
          ENDIF.
       MODIFY SOURCE_PACKAGE INDEX zindex FROM wa_srcpack.
        CLEAR: zindex1.
    endloop.
    Hope this helps...
    Regards
    KP

  • Routing issue between two satellites sites and one central hub

    Hi,
    I have 3 Ad sites with one exchange 2010 hub,cas,mailbox server on each sites.
    One of this site (site A) is central Hub and the two other sites  ( B and C) are two satellites of site A.
    The is no connectivity between site B and C, only connectivity between A and B, and A and C.
    When I send a mail from Site B to Site C, Exchange try to deliver the mail directly to site C and don't pass to site A to deliver to site C, some mail stay in queue in site B, and the the queue is in retry.
    I flag the site A as HUB.
    Site toplogy is correct and the cost too.
    Can someone help me??
    Thanks

    what are your AD costs between A, B and C?
    In Exchange 2010, each message recipient is always associated with only one Active Directory site, and there is only one least cost routing
    from the source Active Directory site to the destination Active Directory site
     If the least-cost routing path to the primary site contains any hub sites, the message must be
    routed through the hub sites

  • Sharer folder issue between two directly connected PC

    Dear All, I have an issue regarding folder sharing. need your help to resolve this. the scenario is
     two PC's are connected directly to share a folder, to open *.mdb file of a accounting software. this problem start when I moved windows XP PC's and installed windows 7 64 bit PC's. there is no compatibility issue as I run the same software on other
    locations
    PC A (192.168.1.200) has that *.mdb file and PC B (192.168.1.100) has to open this file through a network.
    when I configured the folder share  and network setting, all done well and PC B can connect with PC A and that software work well. After two days, when we start the software at PC B, its not responding when  it try's to open that database file.
    while analyzing, I found out that PC B can open the share folder of PC A but when open the desired database folder explore starts not responding and need to quit it by force. I also tried to share another folder of PC A but results are same.
    PC A run the software with out any problem.
    It seems like network issue, so I check the cable with cable tester, found it good, than I check the connectivity by ping command, it giving me <1ms time. but still change the connectors.
    the hard part is that, this share folder issue arises 3-4 days a week and 2-3 days it works well, and this is happening from last 28 days. I mean, one day we start the the PC B and use the software via network, the next day we start the PC B and we don't
    able to use the software,..strange.
    I also change the cable connection from cross to straight as both new PC's have gigabit Ethernet but results are same.
    I already contact with software company, as per them its network issue as we can use the software on local PC (PC A) and there is no error messages popup.
    please help me out in this regard.
    Thanks Tanveer

    Hi,
    Firstly, we need to identify is this file sharing or netowrking problem. If you can access to the shared folder and modify its files which locate at PC B through PC A, it indicates file sharing works with no problem.
    After that, we need to check if its networking or software itself problem when reading the .mdb file.
    Put the .mdb file at PC A, then using the software open it for test. If no problem, we need to use Process Monitor to capture the access trace of the software process, we should be able to find some clues.
    You can access to the link below to download Process Monitor:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645.aspx
    How to capture a Process Monitor trace:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dswl/archive/2010/01/10/how-to-capture-a-process-monitor-trace.aspx
    Learning Example:
    Using Process Monitor to Troubleshoot and Find Registry Hacks:
    http://www.howtogeek.com/school/sysinternals-pro/lesson5/all/
    Note: Since the website is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this information.
    Roger Lu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Data transfer (Export & Import) of Delta Queue between two system.

    We are planning to implement the following senario for a certain R/3 and BW system.
    1. Implement storage snap shot copy solution for R/3 database and create replicated system of production R/3 every day in order to avoid load of production R/3 to BW directly. That is to say, we will extract business data from the replicated R/3 system and forward to BW.
    2. We need to utilize Delta Queue function in order to feed the only gap data between production R/3 and BW. but as stated in 1. the source data will be replicated from the production R/3 every day and so we could not keep the Delta Queue data in R/3.
    3. So, we are examining the following method in order to keep the Delta Data in the replicated R/3 system. i,e after feeding business data from the replicated R/3 to BW, we will extract the following Delta Queue table and keep it.
      - TRFCQOUT (Client Dependent pointer table per queue name and destination.
      - ARFCSSTATE: Likn between TRFCQOUT and ARFCSDARA
      - ARFCSDATA: Compressed data for tRFC/qRFC
    And then, next day, after replicating R/3 system, we will import those Delta data to the replicated R/3 system before stating extract business data and feed to BW.
    Is the such method realistic? if not, is there any alternative?
    Please advice!
    Best regards,

    I found the following document and this is one that I want to inplement.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5d51aa90-0201-0010-749e-d6b993c7a0d6
    Additionaly, I want to execute this senario repeatedly. Does someone have experience such implementation?
    Eguchi.

  • Replication issue between two APO systems

    Hi,
    I have two APO systems. I am trying to replicate the Forecast data from one system to the other. In the first system, I created the Export data source of the Forecast infocube. In the second system, I created a data target and used the extracted datasource from the first system as the info source. Now the issue is that the data is getting updated in the second system except for the one plant where the data is erroring out. When I look at the error, the data seems to have been offset by a character to the left. The error is happening to only this one particular plant. I checked up the plant information in both the systems and it looks alright. Any ideas why only one plant is affected?
    Best Regards,
    Jai

    Please ignore this issue. I found out the data was bad. Unable to delete this question.
    -jai

  • Is it possible to overcome synch/pitch issues between two groups of tracks

    I have a few songs which were originally recorded as a group of rhythm tracks on tape which were subsequently re-mixed to stereo and brought back to have more tracks (vocals, solos, etc.) added.
    Now I have them in digital format, loaded to Logic Express 8. Each song has the original 8 tracks, all synched together, plus the other group comprised of the stereo mix on the original 8 plus 6 added tracks. The tracks in this other group are synched together BUT they are not synched with the original group AND there may be an ever-so-slight pitch variance between the two groups.
    Can this be resolved without any re-recording?

    No, restoring from backup is all or none, You can't select what specific items to restore

  • Routing issue between two Linux servers

    Hello, I have a fedora box with IP Masquerading setup. I used the instructions on tldp.org (http://tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/firewall-examples.html) to set it up. The problem is that I can't ssh from my firewall box to any internal linux box. my firewall is configured eth0 as internal and eth1 as external and just using basic iptables ruleset from the tutorial. When I try to ssh to my internal box 192.168.0.x from the external box I get " ssh: connect to host 192.168.0.x port 22: No route to host". I can ping the ip fine. My routing table looks like this:
    [root@oracle rc.d]# ip route show
    192.168.0.11 via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0
    192.168.0.0/24 via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0
    external_IP/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src ISP_address
    169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link
    default via ISP_gateway dev eth1
    [root@oracle rc.d]# route -n
    Kernel IP routing table
    Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
    192.168.0.11 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
    192.168.0.0 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
    external_IP 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
    169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
    0.0.0.0 ISP_gateway 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1
    what's wrong with my routing table? Please help.
    BTW: the natting works fine, I can ssh to the firewall box on both interface fine. just can't ssh/telnet from the firewall to anywhere else.
    Thanks.

    what are your AD costs between A, B and C?
    In Exchange 2010, each message recipient is always associated with only one Active Directory site, and there is only one least cost routing
    from the source Active Directory site to the destination Active Directory site
     If the least-cost routing path to the primary site contains any hub sites, the message must be
    routed through the hub sites

  • Wireless users facing issue range issue between two ssid

    Hi
    It has been observed  users aren’t able to be connect to CORP SSID  however they are able to connect the GUEST SSID at the same time. Incase user is moved more towards the AP then he is able to connect to CORP SSID.
    Also observed that CORP SSID is showing less signal as compared to guest SSID at same location.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Puneet

    Punnet,
    Its not about the number of clients on that ap at the moment, though you are right recommendations are of about 24 clients on indoor lap platforms provided RF looks good, otherwise i have seen plannings with 16 per lap.
    I think the question George is asking is what is the power level your client is transmitting at and what is the power level of your lap that is in question here?
    Default transmit power on lap is 20dbm, 100 mw to give you the actual power value.
    Usually clients/ machines transmit at 30mw.
    My Questions:
    - Which radio does this client connect to, 802.11b/g/n or a/n?
    - What is the distance between lap and client when it fails to connect?
    - What is the power level for the radio client connects to on that lap? (1 being max and 6 being lowest)
    - Do you have lower data rates of 1 and 2 Mbps enabled on wlc?
      - If yes can we try disabling them, this will improve capacity though at the cost of reduced service area for that lap.
    Regards
    Sahil

  • Another home sharing issue between two macs.

    I have a mac mini as main library for iTunes and all music, the shared folder is showing on desktop just fine. I have a macbook pro where I keep limited music, and there is no sharing folder to be found. I have tripple checked all sharing settings, everything is golden there. I have deauthorized and reauthorized both computers. I have double checked the wifi from my laptop to dektop a few times and that seems to be ok as well. So why can I not seem to figure out what is happening?
    I have read tons of posts about this, and still have no answer. There are posts that say the routers were the issue, but I cant seem to understand how to check for something like that.
    Very frusterated girl looking to be pointed in the right direction. Please and thank you.
    PS
    both on itunes 10
    both signed into same account

    Troubleshooting Home Sharing

  • RDP resolution and scaling level issues between two Win8.1 systems

    I'm trying to follow along with this blog post that describes RDB 8.1 resolution and scaling level updates:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rds/archive/2013/12/16/resolution-and-scaling-level-updates-in-rdp-8-1.aspx
    I'm connecting from one Win8.1 Pro system to another and the scaling level control on the Display control panel, I'm getting an error message that says "The
    display settings can't be changed from a remote session". Both copies of Win8.1 are Pro editions and have had all updates installed.
    Shouldn't my install mean I've got RDB 8.1 with the latest video drivers and that I should
    be able to make these changes? Thanks.

    Hi Chris,
    To verify, if you open a dialog on the remote system, for example, System Properties, and open the same locally and place them side by side, are they the same size, fonts, etc?
    I need to do some testing to verify that auto scaling is not limited to Enterprise SKU.  If we do not get it solved in the next day or so then I may want you to do a screen share and show me what is happening so that I can investigate further.
    -TP

  • OBIEE 11G - Issue passing parameters between two reports

    Hi folks,
    I am struggling to pass parameters between two reports in OBIEE 11G.
    My first report contains the following columns: Rolling Year Type (VCHAR), Year(VCHAR), Month(VCHAR), Cost(Double).
    My second report contains the following columns: Rolling Year Type(VCHAR), Year(VCHAR), Month(VCHAR), Category(VCHAR), Cost(Double).
    My requirement is to pass the Rolling Year Type, Year and Month values from report 1 to report 2.
    On the Month column properties of report 1, I have created an Action Link called 'Drill to Category'. I have clicked on 'Navigate to BI Content' and selected Report 2.
    Then on Report 2, I have included three filters: Rolling Year Type is prompted, Year is prompted, Month is promted.
    When I run the report I always get the following error:
    The specified criteria didn't result in any data. This is often caused by applying filters and/or selections that are too restrictive or that contain incorrect values. Please check your Analysis Filters and try again. The filters currently being applied are shown below.
    When I check the cursor cache, the filter values are correct. Does anybody have any idea why Report 2 does not display?
    When I remove the Month filter, the report works correctly.
    I have since changed the third filter to be Month No and although Report 2 does display, it does not pick up the filter on the Month No.
    I initially thought this may have been a caching issue and so I have disabled BI Server Cache but this does not fix my problem.
    This was never an issue on OBIEE 10G as I found it very easy to navigate between two requests.
    Has anyone else experienced problems with passing parameters between two request in 11G?
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks
    Gavin

    Hi,
    I once tried this kind of requirement(with dashboard prompts though) and hit at similar issue. I later found out that the problem is with the space in the parameter values. Can you please let me know, if the same is the case with you?
    Suppose the parameter passed is "Jan 2010", but the report on the destination takes the value as "Jan" & "2010". Yes, it kind of split the parameter value to two based on space. I think we can notice the filters the destination report got, by enabling filter view.
    In this case, since you pass only value at a time, could you try placing the parameter value anyway in double quotes? I think the Server then will understand it as one value.
    Thank you,
    Dhar

  • Delta functionality between SAP 4.7 and ECC 6

    Hi All,
    Can anyone please provide me with any documents or links on delta functionality between SAP 4.7 and ECC 6.0 in MM/WM.
    Any information would be helpful.
    Regards
    Prashant

    Hello
    Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned;
    Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
    u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
    u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
    u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
    Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
    u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
    u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
    u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
    u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
    Goods receipt
    Goods issue
    Transfer posting
    Remove from storage
    u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
    New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
    u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
    u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
    u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
    u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
    u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
    Requirement prioritizations in materials management
    u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
    u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
    Mass maintenance of outline agreements
    The following two transactions available:
    u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
    u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
    Commitment plan for purchase contracts
    u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
    u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
    u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
    u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
    u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
    u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
    u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
    u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
    u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
    u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
    Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
    u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
    u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
    To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
    Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
    u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
    Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
    Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
    External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
    User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
    Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
    The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
    Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
    The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
    107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
    109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
    Prepayment of invoices
    This functionality is characterized as follows:
    u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
    u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
    u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
    u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
    u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
    u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
    u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
    u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
    u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
    Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
    u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
    u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
    Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
    u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
    u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
    u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
    u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
    u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
    Parking service items
    It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
    Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
    u2022 This Report is available with "Non-Hierarchy" display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
    u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
    Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
    u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
    u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
    u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
    u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location.
    If u want to know more go through the following links
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    http://help.sap.com/saphelperp2005vp/helpdata/en/43/6880cbb88f297ee10000000a422035/frameset.htm_
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERP6/ERP2005+Upgrade
    check following
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/500/html/U40_EN_IN.htm
    for more help check following
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/500/BBlibrary_start.htm
    Go through the following link for the Delta functionality notes
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Billing in Stock Transfer between two plants of two different company codes

    Hi Friends,
    I am doing the scenario of stock transfer between two plants of different  company codes.
    I have some issues in Billing for this..
    What are the settings do i need to to for Pricing in SD point of view.
    Ex:
    Supplying         /         Receiving
    Com.Code:2000     /        CompanyCode:1000
    Plant:2100              /         Plant:1100
    SA:2000/10/00      /          SA:1000/10/00
    I created Customer 5555 w.r.t sales area of supplying company code (2000/10/00)
    I created Vendor  7777 and assigned Supplying Plant 2100 in add purchasing data.
    In IMG Settings:
    Define Shipping Data for Plants: In Receving Plant i assigned customer 5555 and sales area blank
                                                        In Supplying Plant i assigned customer blank and sales area as 2000/10/00
    Create Checking Rule: Standard(B SD Delivery)
    Define Checking Rule: Standard(Avallability-01assigned to checking rule B)
    Assign Delivery Type and Checking rule: Document type(NB)-Supplying Plant(2100)-Delivery Type(NLCC)-Checking Rule-(B)
    Assign Doc Type:Supplying Plant(2100)-Receving Plant(1100)-Doc type(NB)
    What are Pricing settings in SD i have to do?????????
    Process:
    ME21N->VL10B->VL02N(PGI)->VF01(IV)->MIGO->MIRO
    I have gone through many threads in Forum but confusion in Pricing Part..
    Some are mixing with the inter company sales proces..
    Pls guide me..
    With Regards

    Do the following steps for STO Customizing:-
    1. Create a customer master record for the issuing plant.
    2. Create a vendor master record for the issuing plant, and enter customer account number in the Customer field on the Control screen.
    3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 for the receiving plant.
    4. Assign the plants to the customer master record in Customizing for Materials Management (MM), by choosing Purchasing <Purchase Order < Set Up Stock Transport Order< Plants.
    The Process Flow would be as follows :-
    Create a stock transport order, following the standard procedure, and send the order to the issuing plant.
    Issuing plant has processes your order, and when it is ready to ship,the storeperson at the issuing plant issues the goods using a transfer posting. The excise clerk there creates an excise invoice.The excise supervisor verifies and posts the excise invoice.It then sends the goods to you, together with the excise invoice.
    Once the goods arrive, you follow the standard procedure for incoming excise invoices:
    The excise clerk captures the excise invoice, using the stock transport order as the reference document. The storeperson enters the goods receipt, again using the stock transport order as the reference document.Alternatively, you can first enter the goods receipt and then capture the excise invoice.
    The excise supervisor then posts the excise invoice.
    Best Regards,
    Ankur

Maybe you are looking for