Determinations for a szenario without BPM

Hi,
if I would like to create a WebService -> XI -> DB szenario
without BPM, how often I have to use the wizard (for agreements
and determinations)?
Normally with BPM, I needed three:
1) Webserivce BS to XI
2) XI to DB
3) XI to WebSerivice
But without BPM I thought I need just one wizard walkthrough:
1) sync. Webservice to sync. DB call
But I received the following error:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_BE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
So it seems something missing...
Any ideas?
Thanks
regards
chris

Hi,
I reactivated themand clear cache, but still same problem.
My trace:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
- <SOAP:Header>
- <SAP:Main xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:wsu="http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" versionMajor="003" versionMinor="000" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" wsu:Id="wsuid-main-92ABE13F5C59AB7FE10000000A1551F7">
<SAP:MessageClass>SystemError</SAP:MessageClass>
<SAP:ProcessingMode>synchronous</SAP:ProcessingMode>
<SAP:MessageId>456AF5D9-AB80-5A2C-E100-00000AFBCF14</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:RefToMessageId>C8628B40-7E26-11DB-A03C-0003BACE8C09</SAP:RefToMessageId>
<SAP:TimeSent>2006-11-27T14:51:37Z</SAP:TimeSent>
- <SAP:Sender>
<SAP:Service />
<SAP:Interface namespace="" />
</SAP:Sender>
- <SAP:Receiver>
<SAP:Party agency="" scheme="" />
<SAP:Service>BS_EP7_SOAP</SAP:Service>
<SAP:Interface namespace="http://test.ri/CMDBWithoutBPM">MI_CMDB_request</SAP:Interface>
</SAP:Receiver>
<SAP:Interface namespace="http://test.ri/CMDBWithoutBPM">MI_CMDB_request</SAP:Interface>
</SAP:Main>
- <SAP:ReliableMessaging xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:QualityOfService>BestEffort</SAP:QualityOfService>
</SAP:ReliableMessaging>
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_BE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
- <SAP:HopList xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
- <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2006-11-27T14:51:37Z" wasRead="false">
<SAP:Engine type="AE">af.xit.xidscbi</SAP:Engine>
<SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XIRA</SAP:Adapter>
<SAP:MessageId>C8628B40-7E26-11DB-A03C-0003BACE8C09</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:Info />
</SAP:Hop>
- <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2006-11-27T14:51:37Z" wasRead="false">
<SAP:Engine type="IS">is.01.xidscbi</SAP:Engine>
<SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XI</SAP:Adapter>
<SAP:MessageId>C8628B40-7E26-11DB-A03C-0003BACE8C09</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:Info>3.0</SAP:Info>
</SAP:Hop>
</SAP:HopList>
- <SAP:RunTime xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SAP:Date>20061127</SAP:Date>
<SAP:Time>155137</SAP:Time>
<SAP:Host>xidscbi</SAP:Host>
<SAP:SystemId>XIT</SAP:SystemId>
<SAP:SystemNr>01</SAP:SystemNr>
<SAP:OS>SunOS</SAP:OS>
<SAP:DB>ORACLE</SAP:DB>
<SAP:Language />
<SAP:ProcStatus>023</SAP:ProcStatus>
<SAP:AdapterStatus>000</SAP:AdapterStatus>
<SAP:User>PIAFUSER</SAP:User>
<SAP:TraceLevel>1</SAP:TraceLevel>
<SAP:LogSeqNbr>000</SAP:LogSeqNbr>
<SAP:RetryLogSeqNbr>000</SAP:RetryLogSeqNbr>
<SAP:PipelineIdInternal>SAP_CENTRAL</SAP:PipelineIdInternal>
<SAP:PipelineIdExternal>CENTRAL</SAP:PipelineIdExternal>
<SAP:PipelineElementId>5BC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</SAP:PipelineElementId>
<SAP:PipelineService>PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</SAP:PipelineService>
<SAP:QIdInternal />
<SAP:CommitActor>X</SAP:CommitActor>
<SAP:SplitNumber>0</SAP:SplitNumber>
<SAP:NumberOfRetries>0</SAP:NumberOfRetries>
<SAP:NumberOfManualRetries>0</SAP:NumberOfManualRetries>
<SAP:TypeOfEngine client="001">CENTRAL</SAP:TypeOfEngine>
<SAP:PlsrvExceptionCode />
<SAP:EOReferenceRuntime type="TID" />
<SAP:EOReferenceInbound type="TID" />
<SAP:EOReferenceOutbound type="TID" />
<SAP:MessageSizePayload>771</SAP:MessageSizePayload>
<SAP:MessageSizeTotal>3360</SAP:MessageSizeTotal>
<SAP:PayloadSizeRequest>771</SAP:PayloadSizeRequest>
<SAP:PayloadSizeRequestMap>0</SAP:PayloadSizeRequestMap>
<SAP:PayloadSizeResponse>0</SAP:PayloadSizeResponse>
<SAP:PayloadSizeResponseMap>0</SAP:PayloadSizeResponseMap>
<SAP:Reorganization>INI</SAP:Reorganization>
<SAP:AdapterOutbound>AENGINE</SAP:AdapterOutbound>
<SAP:InterfaceAction>INIT</SAP:InterfaceAction>
<SAP:RandomNumber>62</SAP:RandomNumber>
<SAP:AckStatus>000</SAP:AckStatus>
<SAP:SkipReceiverDetermination />
</SAP:RunTime>
- <SAP:PerformanceHeader xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="xidscbi">20061127145137.380731</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="xidscbi">20061127145137.461964</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="xidscbi">20061127145137.463046</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="xidscbi">20061127145137.47029</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="xidscbi">20061127145137.474297</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="xidscbi">20061127145137.829578</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
</SAP:PerformanceHeader>
- <SAP:Diagnostic xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:TraceLevel>Information</SAP:TraceLevel>
<SAP:Logging>Off</SAP:Logging>
</SAP:Diagnostic>
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XIT</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-11-27T14:51:37Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = C8628B407E2611DBA03C0003BACE8C09</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = BE</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No Relation found - accept given Receivers.</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">SystemError message generated. Guid: 456AF5D9AB805A2CE10000000AFBCF14</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Error during execution of message : C8628B407E2611DBA03C0003BACE8C09</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">ApplicationMessage was (=RefToMsgId): C8628B407E2611DBA03C0003BACE8C09</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
</SAP:Trace>
</SOAP:Header>
- <SOAP:Body>
<SAP:Manifest xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:wsu="http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" wsu:Id="wsuid-manifest-5CABE13F5C59AB7FE10000000A1551F7" />
</SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
I'm not able to see where the error comes from
regards
chris

Similar Messages

Suggestion required for with or without BPM

I have a requirement IDOC-XI-SOAP.
I am using multimapping 1:N one idoc gets spilt into say three wsdl, A B and C.
My first requirement is if A fails then B and C should not be sent.
If I use only EOIO without BPM then I will need to identify B and C for the corresponding A in the queue and remove it.
That looks tedious as sometimes B and C may not be there for A and is there any way to identify the related messages?
This can be achieved through BPM I believe.
My second requirement is IDOC2 should not be processed before IDOC1.
So If I used BPM will this be guaranteed? is BPM EOIO. (Even after transformation step?) If not then can it be configured?
Thanks in advance.

Hi all,
Just bringing this topic up again as I have stuck at one place. and found not much help on SDN.
I have designed this requirement using BPM.
That is IDOC-BPM-SOAP.
Within BPM I make a synchronous call to Webservice. if there is a fault exception thrown the BPM workflow stops at that point and no further process steps are carried out. This is working fine as per the requirement.
But this does not get blocked up in the BPM queue. I want to stop the next IDOC from processing before handling the prviously errored IDOC scenario.
Now I briefly understand that since BPM is doing a sync call these are not placed in the queue. Is there a way I can handle this so that these interfaces are placed in the BPM queue (which starts with XBQO$PE_WS.....).
I have tried with exception branch, even this stops the BPM workflow but does not block the queue, or the workflow gets processed successfully.
Is there anyway I can block the queue if the BPM synch call fails?

Can we capture HTTP response for async message without BPM?

We are in the process of migrating an XI 2.0 scenario to XI 3.0.
The scenario is as follows in XI 2.0 - SAP sends an IDoc to XI which is mapped to an HTTP request and sent to an endpoint. The HTTP response is captured and shown in SXMB_MONI.
When we migrate this scenario to XI 3.0, we do not see the HTTP response in MONI. It looks like since the incoming message (IDoc) is triggering an asynchronous message flow, the HTTP receiver is ignoring the HTTP response payload if it sees a 200 OK status code. Ideally, we would like for the HTTP response to be captured in MONI just as in XI 2.0.
Is there a way to capture the HTTP response without using a BPM to make the HTTP synchronous call? It appears that there is nothing in the HTTP receiver communication channel that we can change (to change it from asynchronous to synchronous).
Thanks for your help,
Jay Malla
SAP XI Consultant
Licensed To Code

It looks like the problem I am having might be due to a bug in SP15. It looks like i should see the HTTP response in MONI by default. Some other people had this problem with SP 15. Here is the posting:
Re: SXMB_MONI does not show payload after upgrade to SP15
Regards,
Jay

Interface Determination for source file without namespace definition

Hi,
I have the following problem:
I am developing a file to IDoc scenario in AEX 7.31. All design objects in ESR and configuration objects in ID are created and the sender communication channel is running. Now I got a test file. It starts directly with the data elements but does not contain the root element as defined in my data type. To make it clear:
Data Type in ESR:
DT_DatatypeA
-- Record [1..unbounded]
---- Field1
---- Field2
The File looks as follows (it lacks the root element 'DT_Datatype_A'):
<Record>
<Field1>...</Field1>
<Field2>...</Field2>
</Record>
<Record>
<Field1>...</Field1>
<Field2>...</Field2>
</Record>
When I try to send it via PI I get the following error:
When I add the XML root element <ns0:DT_DatatypeA ns="..."> manually to the file (and the corresponding end tag), the message is processed correctly.
How can I solve this issue? The file is created by a legacy system which does not know anything about my PI namespaces.
Thanks in advance!

i am bit confused here.
how does your input look like? i.e when sender generates the files..
is that like below xml?
<Record>
<Field1>...</Field1>
<Field2>...</Field2>
</Record>
<Record>
<Field1>...</Field1>
<Field2>...</Field2>
</Record>
or
is it a flat file? and you use FCC in the sender adapter to convert it into xml?
Field1,Field2
Field1,Field2

Alerts with variables from the messages payload without BPM?

Hi, experts:
Is it possible to define a alert category with variables from the messages payload(for example:order_id ) without BPM?
Regards
Yu Ming

Refer to
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid21_gci1240902,00.html
initially this also talk about BPM but you can check whether you can use the container variable in you case.
How to define the container variable in ALRTCATDEF is mention in above link.
**Points if answers find useful.
Gaurav Jain

Async-Sync Bridge without BPM for SOAP WS and JDBC

I heard you can now have async-sync communication outside of BPM by utilizing adapter modules?
My scenarios are:
proxy (async) -> SOAP WS (sync)
proxy (async) -> JDBC (sync)
I will like to capture the synchronous responses in XI and perform some basic error handling.
I read h[File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.|File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.] and the release notes for 2004s SP19 and there is no reference to JDBC or SOAP.
tia

Hi Megha,
Plz do refer the below links u will get an idea:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a05b2347-01e7-2910-ceac-c45577e574e0
Sync/Async communication in Adapter without BPM (SP19)
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
Async/Sync Communication using JMS adapter without BPM (SP 19)
Async/Sync Communication using JMS adapter without BPM (SP 19)
also try this
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.
Collecting IDocs without using BPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
Have a look
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
HTTP to RFC - A Starter Kit
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Do refer this thread:
JDBC Async-Sync bridge does not work
Reward if found useful
Regards,
Vinod.

1:N mapping without BPM ( Idoc Receiver)

Hi,
I have a scenario like 1:N, source would be JMS and the receiver side have two Idocs with the same business system. based on one Item segment value, I need to route the input JMS message to corresponding receiver IDoc.
INput Structure:
Record
Header 1..1
H1
H2
H3
Item 1..Unbounded
I1
I2
I3
NOte: Based on value I2, I need to route the message to corresponding receiver Idoc. like If I2=A then Idoc1 and I2=B then Idoc2. Can we achieve the same without using BPM?
-Esha

Hi,
This can be achieved with Interface Determination conditions. Go for 2 mapping. And in Interface Determination put condition to check which mapping to use. No need of ccBPM.
If you still want to go for 1:N multimapping please refer link:
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
without BPM.
Regards,
Vineetha.
Edited by: Vineetha on Apr 27, 2010 11:44 AM

How to call multiple request to CRM and R/3 without BPM

Hi all
I have a scenario where a SOAP request will come to XI via webservice
I then have to call an interface mapping which has Java mapping in it(the java code is basically calling an RFC in CRM) - then i'll receive the response of interface mapping and send it back to the customer.
Step 2 :The SOAP request which i have received in the first place is to be written as a flat/xml file onto a directory for backup purpose
Step 3: there will be a separate process where the response of rfc will be fed to an IDOC request structure and send to R/3 as a dashboard IDOC.
All this is done without BPM.
So my first problem is "how to write an incoming SOAP request to a file without using BPM?? "
Second I knw that interface mapping can be directly added in Integration directory's Interface determination by making the property as enhanced but "In the Sender Service i write the Business system which contains soap comm channel and in the interface i write the outbound synchronous interface which is the SOAP outbound that hits the xi for the first time But i am not sure what service do i write in the receiver section as Interface mapping is in XI only....theres no other business system or communication channel involved in between."
I really need help...plz help me

Yes abhishek
Client dont want BPM involved as it makes the process really slow
First of all i wanna knw how to use enhanced option in an interface determination....in the ID
as i am trying to load my interface mapping but it says no object found
I am giving you the structure of interface mapping
MI_OB_SAX_MAP (outbound async source interface of interface mapping )
MI_IB_SAX_MAP (inbound async target interface of interface mapping)
MT_OB_SAX_MAP (source message)
JavaClass - test_java/sax_map (Java mapping program)
MT_IB_SAX_MAP (target message
Now when i am trying to configure this in ID
BS__ (Sender business system)
MI_OS_TEST_JAVAMAP (sender SOAP interface)
But i dnt what receiver business system should i select in receiver service ??
as the java mapping is calling RFC inside the code...so no other business system involved
i m stuck.....if u could plz have a look into it

Error in Multi-mapping without BPM

Hi frnds,
I am doing a scenario File-XI-File. I am using the multi-splitting thing in the Message mapping. I have taken care of all the occurance's and "enhanced" thing in the IR and ID resp. I m using SP16. I want to avoid BPM.
But therez sme error cming up. When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping" and when I test my interface using the Test Configuration in the ID, its shwing error in the Receiver Determination -- "HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed. Error: 403 Forbidden"
I have checked most of the blogs and forum suggestions. I have checked the ICF activations as well ...
So, do come back to me with your valuable suggestions, and I will award them points, if they really help me out.
Thanks and regards.
Neetesh

Hi Neetesh,

When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping"
For this, Can you check the source XML. Does it contain Tags like <messages> .. If yes, you need to remove them from your source XML.
If i am right, you have copied the XML from the TEST tab of the message mapping and pasted it in a notepad and saved it without making any changes at all..... Just do as i have mentioned above and i am sure you will no more get that error message in your MONI....
Also go through this weblog which talks about multi-mapping without BPM,
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Regards,
Abhy

1:2 Message Mapping WithOut BPM - Split mapping created no messages Error

Hi,
I am a new-bie to SAP PI and am trying out the following scenario without BPM.
Make multiple files based on Age received from input file.Input File contains Name,DOB and Output File contains Name, Age.
I want to create 2 files, one containing details of people with Age <21 and the other output file containing details of people with Age >= 21.
To acheive this,
In IR, I created 2 DT and 3 MT,1 MM with 2 Target MT,both having occurences 0..unbounded, 1 IM with 2 Target MI,both having occurences 0..unbounded
And in ID, 1 Sender Agreement, 2 Receiver Agreement, 1 Receiver Determination, 1 Interface Determination using Enhanced Interface Determination.
When i run this scenario, I am getting the following error "Split mapping created no messages"
Please let me know how can I resolve it.

Oops, I did not know that.
Thanks for that information. uhuuuuuuuuuuu, atlast the message is processed and I am seeing output files created.
But, there is still one problem. My output files are created with just the following content
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ns1:MT_2OP_File_Out xmlns:ns1="http://POC_Sec1_1IP2OP2" />
In MM, I see the output message as follows:
Message
 Message1
 MT_2OP_File_Out
 Employee
 Name
 Age
 Message2
 MT_2OP_File_Out1
 Employee1
 Name
 Age
The mapping done:
MT_2OP_File_Out and MT_2OP_File_Out with the Message Type element on source end.
Employee and Employee1 are mapped as
 Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] < 21, Map Employee
 Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] >= 21, Map Employee1 resp
The fields are straight maps.
Is there any basic mapping error that I am making. Please help.

Sync/Async JMS without BPM - No receiver specified in message object

Hi All,
My scenario is Proxy - JMS - Proxy. I have chosen to do this without BPM and had followed closely to the instructions given in various help documents/blog/forum threads. During testing, the proxy returns a system fault 'No receiver specified in message object'. In RWB it indicates that the correlation is correct and the JMS Receiver adapter is getting the response, below is part of the audit log:
2009-08-03 18:12:32 Information WRB: retrieving the message for de80831d-97f5-08f1-bdaf-00145e6883af ...
2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information WRB: retrieved the message: ApplicationResponse
2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information WRB: leaving WaitResponseBean
2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information MP: leaving
2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information The message was successfully delivered to the application using connection JMS_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information The message status was set to DLVD.
When I check SXMB_MONI in XI-ABAP, I see 2 messages with status 'System Error - Restart not possible' and 1 with status 'Log Version'. The message with status 'Log Version' is the respond. The other 2 messages has the following error:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">NO_RECEIVER</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver specified in message object</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
It seem to me that the system does not know where to go/what to do next after returning to the JMS Receiver adapter. I am at a lost what could have gone wrong. Here is how I've done my configuration.
Repository
- Sync Sender Interface for R/3 Backend
- Sync Receiver Interface for MQ
- Async Sender Interface for the reply
Directory
- 1 CC for JMS Recevier
- 1 CC for JMS Sender (for the respond)
- 1 CC for Proxy Sender
- 1 Interface Determination
- 1 Receiver Determination
- 1 Receiver Agreement for JMS Receiver
- 1 Sender Agreement for the reply
Any help is appreciated. Thanks.

Hi Prateek,
This is what was tried in my first case. I did exactly what was given in that link.But since the Message id being 32 bytes and length of correlation id is 24 bytes id is getting truncated.
So its not working fine.
@ke i am having a look at the note will update you on this
Thanks for your response
Rgds
Aditya

Message splitting without bpm

Could anyone please give any idea or links about end to end configuration for message splitting without using bpm.
Thanks
sabyasachi
Edited by: Sabyasachi Mohapatra on Apr 7, 2009 11:50 AM

Hi Sameerr
.i have one sender & 2 receivers.Please guide how to configure end to end in the receiver determination step & interface determination step.How many sender & receiver agreements need to be configured.
Thanks & Regards
Sabyasachi

Multi Message Mapping without BPM: Limitaions

Hi Crew,
I have done this one(without BPM)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3115. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
I understood that there cannot be multiple receiver services.
This message splitting can be done only with one sender and one receiver business services (with many communication channels) without BPM.
Am I right?
Are there anymore limitations than this?
Regards,
Karthik kaveriselvan.

select multiple receivers using the + button.
one sender service.
two receiver service referring to one target interface each with one communicaiton channel each.
Two interface determination for two business services and they both are refering to the same enhanced interface mapping.
Created receiver determination and added the two receiver service to it, but when looking at the configuration overview for receiver determinaiton, for each service, both the target interfaces used in interface mapping are listed and the reciever determination shows "Does not exist".
When I run the scenario, I get "No receiver agreement found" error.
Please calrify how many receiver agreements have to be configured and how?
Thanks
karthik

The N:M message spliting without BPM in PI7.1 ???

Hi,experts
I'm doing an scenario which implements the N:M messages split without BPM...
The data type structure as below:
================================
SOURCE_TEST
 A 0...1
 B 0...1
 C 0...1
 D 0...1
 E 0...1
================================
TARGET1_TEST
 F 0...1
 G 0...1
================================
TARGET2_TEST
 H 0...1
 I 0...1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Now i want to split msgs and do the mapping as A-->F,B--->G and D>H,E--
>I which depends on the C value,,
for instance,if C="1" then generate TARGET1_TEST,if C="2" then generate TARGET2_TEST
and i changed the signature tab,set the occurence of SOURCE_TEST 0....unbounded,
added the two target msg type into the Target messages and also set the occurence of them 0...unbounded.
Then did the mapping(the mapping implemented no problem,it's sure)
after did the operation mapping,do the ID objects as below:
one sender bussiness component,one sender communication channel,one interface determination,one receiver determination,one send agreement,one receive business component,two receiver communication channel,two receiver agreements
the issue now is when i do the " test configuration" in ID,it pops up "Runtime error Split mapping created no messages"
but i go to check the operation mapping and cannot find any issue in it coz it's as fine as message mapping
could anybody shed some lights on it?
Thanks in adv.
Regards.

oh....is it really we cannot implement it without BPM or just you havn't do that?i just saw a blog written about 1:N without BPM and it's said we can do N:M similarly,so i want to have a try,now it pops up the errors as below:
Runtime error
Split mapping created no messages
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Object ID of Interface Mapping 97B524981FD63207AA98CA34BF326F12 </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Version ID of Interface Mapping 6712C511963511DEAEAAF2F4AC197482 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:97B524981FD63207AA98CA34BF326F12 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:6712C511963511DEAEAAF2F4AC197482 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA_JDK </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">MTOM attachments are written to the payload </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Executing multi-mapping </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_.class (http://infosys.com/pi/projects/sysco/n2, -1) in swcv 6712c511-9635-11de-aeaa-f2f4ac197482. </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerLibsList.class (http://infosys.com/pi/projects/sysco/n2, -1) in swcv 6712c511-9635-11de-aeaa-f2f4ac197482. </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerLibsList </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerParamsList.class (http://infosys.com/pi/projects/sysco/n2, -1) in swcv 6712c511-9635-11de-aeaa-f2f4ac197482. </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerParamsList </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T"> *** START APPLICATION TRACE *** </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Document start </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Messages] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Add raw attribute [ xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge"] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Message1] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Message1] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Message2] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Message2] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Messages] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Document end </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T"> *** END APPLICATION TRACE *** </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ completed. (executeStep() of com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_). </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Message Type 1 Number of Messages 0 </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Message Type 2 Number of Messages 0 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>

Async-Sync-Async Bridge Without BPM

HI Folks,
I have a requirement as
u201CAn Asynchronous SOAP request is triggered to PI and then should get records from a (JDBC)database and write the result to a fileu201D
It is of Aync-Sync-Async Bridge and i have to do without BPM
I know by using some module parameters at sender communication channel we can do this.
But my query
1)Is that for SOAP sender communication channel can we provide the same module parameters
Number - ModuleName - Type - ModuleKey
1- AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean - Local Enterprise Bean - 1
2- CallSapAdapter-Local Enterprise Bean - 2
3-AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean-3
Parameters
ModuleKey - ParameterName - ParameterValue
1 - passThrough - true
3-receiverChannel - Receiver File Adapter Name
3-receiverService - Receiver Business Service/ System
2) Does the SOAP support the without BPM scenarios
3)Scenario is like Soap --> JDBC -->File (Async - Sync - Async) and how abt for Soap --> RFC -->File (Async - Sync - Async)
Thanks in Advance
Lemon

For your requirement , you can handle this scenario without BPM in two ways.
1) Async sync bridge without BPM. You are going to use request response bean and one way response bean module to achieve this. very simple. See this [link|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/File-RFC-File(Without%20BPM)]
In the sender SOAP channel you have to configure first request response bean, second callsapadapter and third onewayresponse bean. Refer this link. Simply follow file sender configuration for your soap sender or RFC sender.
Note: one receiver agreement , one receiver determination, one interface determination. only two receiver channels one jdbc and one file.
2) You can create SOAP to File asynchronous. Using quality of service EO and creating service interface asynchronous mode. In the mapping area do JDBC lookup. If your version is 7.1 then this lookup is available. This is pretty simple no need to do async to sync pattern.
Hope that helps.

Determinations for a szenario without BPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for