Difference in the Material variant  BOM Qty during Standard Cost estimation

Hi SAP Experts,
We are trying to estimate the cost for the material variant, but the BOM exploded
during the cost estimation, the quantity differs slightly with the BOM exploded
during CU50.
What might be the reasons for difference.
Please give your valuable Inputs.
Thanks
Best Regards
Siva

Dear Mr.Kumar,
<b>For any material in the material master , for Price
Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
maintain S or V.</b>
<i>For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
(Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
items we maintain V(Moving Average price).</i>
<b>During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.</b>
So either you have to use the moving average price for
both inhouse & bought out.
<b>Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
Moving Average price.
Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.</b>
If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
product) using the same amount which you spend for
producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
<b>If useful reward points.</b>
Regards
Mangal
Message was edited by:
        Mangalraj

Similar Messages

  • Difference in the BOM Qty during Standard Cost estimation

    Hi SAP Experts,
    We are trying to estimate the cost for the material variant, but the BOM exploded during the cost estimation, the quantity differs slightly with the BOM exploded during CU50.
    What might be the reasons for difference.
    Please give your valuable Inputs.
    Thanks
    Best Regards
    Siva

    Dear Mr.Kumar,
    <b>For any material in the material master , for Price
    Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
    maintain S or V.</b>
    <i>For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
    (Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
    items we maintain V(Moving Average price).</i>
    <b>During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
    split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.</b>
    So either you have to use the moving average price for
    both inhouse & bought out.
    <b>Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
    Moving Average price.
    Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.</b>
    If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
    product) using the same amount which you spend for
    producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
    standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
    I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
    <b>If useful reward points.</b>
    Regards
    Mangal
    Message was edited by:
            Mangalraj

  • The split (i.e., 70% & 30%)during standard cost estimation (CK11)

    Dear All,
    A component(Y) in the BOM of X is manufactured in house (70%) & procured directly from vendor (30%).
    Can we have the split (i.e., 70% & 30%)during standard cost estimation (CK11)
    Based on the cost we deside to make or buy.
    Please explain the procedural steps in arriving at this solution.
    Regards,
    Kumar

    Dear Mr.Kumar,
    <b>For any material in the material master , for Price
    Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
    maintain S or V.</b>
    <i>For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
    (Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
    items we maintain V(Moving Average price).</i>
    <b>During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
    split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.</b>
    So either you have to use the moving average price for
    both inhouse & bought out.
    <b>Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
    Moving Average price.
    Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.</b>
    If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
    product) using the same amount which you spend for
    producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
    standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
    I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
    <b>If useful reward points.</b>
    Regards
    Mangal
    Message was edited by:
            Mangalraj

  • Routing during Standard Cost Estimation

    Dear all,
    We are executing the Standard Costing using t_code CK11N for a finished product,,,for the same we have maintained BOM, but no routing has been created,,
    so, during execution of Standard Costing system is prompting a msg: No routing could be determined for material AUBF0018 (green indicator not an error msg), so if we try save the costing a success msg: "The cost estimate is being save" is being prompted,, but the standard cost did not get updated in material master.
    what would be the cause? Is routing essential prior to standard cost execution,,, as our Client says that without routing also they could excute/update the standard cost earlier,,, why this problem is occuring? is there any thing need to be defined in customization for routing not to consider during standard cost estimation,
    Please help us in this regard,
    thanks
    Kumar

    Dear Urendra,
    1.After executing the costing run with quantity structure in CK11N and saving the datas,it only saves the cost estimate.
    2.Marking and release should be done using CK24.First the same has to be marked and then using the same T Code you have to
    release it,only after this steps it get's updated in the material master.
    3.In your case you have done only CK11N and not CK24.
    4.Moreover the routing get's picked automatically by the costing variant that you use,in your case even though there is no
    routing,the systems throws the message before saving,but the status will be saved with errors.
    Check with this and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Standard cost estimation after goods movement when material ledger is activ

    Hi!
    our client is activated material ledger, for some materials standard cost estimation is done till marking but not released.
    goods movements have been posted for those materials.
    Now system is not allowing to release the standar price for those material in the current period, as material ledger expects same price for entrie period.
    what is the alternative way to update the standard price for those materials ( with out reversing the goods movements).
    regs,
    ramesh

    Hi Ramesh,
    When you are using Material Ledger, after goods movemnets for materials, no need to change the standard cost estimate as Actual costing run will take care to derive the PUP price.
    If there is no standard cost estimation release for sold materials (e.g.FG), you will get an error message duirng the billing document release to accounting. To aviod this error, if you are using split valuation (valuation types) and mixing ratios (CK91N & CK94), try with the below steps:
    Create a new valuation type for the same material
    Crate CK11N & CK94,
    Run CK11N
    Run CK24.
    Then release the billing document.
    Let me know if you need more details.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ADI

  • What is the impact if we switch from standard costing to actual costing?

    Hi all,
    what is the impact if we switch from standard costing to actual costing?
    what are the changes is needed in costing?
    thanks.

    Hello,
    Its an nice idea to switch from standard to actual costing. It would be advisable to make this switch over happen in a new period praferably with a new year. You would need to carry out the settings for material ledger / actual costing and for the accounting settings you may refer to sap note 908737.
    Not much costing changes would be necessary to the existing configuration but you would need to activate material ledger and allign your Inventory accordingly. The settings for ML would be relatively simple but the main problem would be handling the inventory that you already have in stock. You would also need to have a proper closing procedure followed by next month's planning approach which would actualise the inventory at the end of the month and decide the methodology for next month's plan valuation. It  should be kept in mind for configuring ML.
    The closing sequence would be as under:
    1. Complete all Cost Center and production order postings.
    2. Complete all Cost center Assessment / Distribution
    3. Calculate Actual rate
    4. Revaluate production orders
    5. Calculate WIP
    6. Settle Production Order
    7. Run Costing Run (CKMLCP)
    Material ledger is capable of actualising activity costs and WIP as well and you should configure it according to your need.
    You can follow the standard SAP documentations for configurations + Note 908737 for configuring ML.
    Kind Regards // Shaubhik

  • User Exist for Material master data changes like standard cost, master pric

    Hello,
    Could anyone please provide the user exit name for the following requirement. 
    The trigger to transfer data from SAP to Unix directory should be whenever one of the SAP field values change (standard cost, master price, Type Of Sales) or whenever a new item is added to SAP.  The data will be interfaced out of SAP NIGHTLY using the certain data format.
    thanks
    kumar

    Hi Lakshminarayanan
      thanks for your information.
    i have tested by changing the Type of Sales in material master(MM02) but the FM - EXIT_SAPLMGMU_001(MGA00001) did NOT get trigger. i did not write any code in side the INCLUDE program.i just tried wether the User Exit is getting trigger or not while changing the material master.
    Please advise me how to test it.
    Thanks
    Kumar

  • Difference in the appearance of HTML vs. Standard reports generated with the Report Generation VIs?

    When I generate a "Standard Report" (to a printer or PDF) with the attached code, the output looks like this:
    If I instead use the same code to generate an HTML report, the output looks like this:
    Can anyone explain why the HTML output has had the extra spaces stripped out of it?
    Is there anything I can do to prevent it from happening?
    VI is attached (LV v11.0.1f2) but this is what it looks like...
    Attachments:
    Print Test.vi ‏47 KB

    SteveBale wrote:
    If you look at your html source the spaces are there. The problem is the way html is rendered it removes the spaces. You will either need to add in <pre> </pre> tags to tell the browser to include those spaces, or insert the string &nbsp; which the browser interprets as a single space.
    Regards,
    Steve
    OK, thanks. I guess I'll end up living with it the way that it is because
    using either method seems to also have the side effect of causing the output to become double-spaced and
    the only reasonable place to implement the change (so that it did not also impact the "standard report" output) would be within the report generation VIs and I'd rather not be modifying them.

  • How to find the list of material variant based on the characteristics value

    Hi
    We are creating materials variants for FERT Material Type in material master in MRP-3 view .There we configure the variant by attaching characteristics value 
    Now we want to have a report , which can give the list of material variants , if char value is given in selection
    Can somebody guide me if there is standard report for this OR what is the linkage in Table , so that we can develop a report
    rgds
    Sandeep

    I couldn't find a standard report to get the material variants based on characteristic values (the nearest I could find was CT12) but I wrote a report some time back here's the table join logic for the main select statement.
    select a~matnr
            e~atwrt
            h~atwtb
    into table i_tab
          from MARC as a
          inner join IBIN as b
          on b~instance eq a~cuobj
          inner join IBIB as c
          on c~ibase eq b~ibase
          inner join IBINVALUES as d
          on d~in_recno eq b~in_recno
          inner join IBSYMBOL as e
          on e~symbol_id eq d~symbol_id
          inner join CABN as f
          on f~atinn eq e~atinn
          inner join CAWN as g
          on g~atinn eq e~atinn
          and g~atwrt eq e~atwrt
          inner join CAWNT as h
          on h~atinn eq g~atinn
          and h~atzhl eq g~atzhl
         where     a~matnr in s_matnr
                and e~atinn in s_atinn
                and e~atwrt in s_atwrt
               and b~valto eq '99991231235959'. "This is important condition
    I included bare minimum fields to suite your requirement needs you can add whatever other field you want . Though I tested the table join, I suggest you to test it again before writing your own ABAP program using SE16N.

  • BOM - Standard report to view the material - BOM relationship

    Hi
    Our client has a requirement to view the material - BOM relationship. The input will be the material and the report should display all the levels above the material. Say for example if the material is in level 5, it should display the BOM strucutre from level 0 to level 5. If the same material is in various levels, the structure should map from level 0 to the lowest level of the material.
    Is there any standard report/function available for the above requirement.?

    Hello Venkatachalam
    As eariler related to BOM level wise you posted a quiery on SDN ....
    I having Similar quiery  as per yours......  I need your help.
    Is it possible for you to  make a telephonic conversation so i may provide you proper details .
    With Regards
    DhruvOM
    Phone number :-+919765032999

  • Transfer of characteristics values from material variant to its subordinate

    Gurus
    Need your Expert opinion on Variant configuration
    We are using Multi level Material Variants and our bussiness process demands for configuration of These Material variants in Transaction MD81 and during creation of Sales order .These configuration will not affetc the BOM explosion but will only be passed to the The lower level components (Which are again theMulti level Configuriable  Material variants ) as manufacturing instructions .To Enable these Flow of Characterisitcs we have Applied a Note which allows the Multi level Configuration of Material Variants and Pass this Values to lower Level and the characteristics value flow is visible as well for lower level from CU50 ,but when i create the requirement through  CIR or sales order and Configure the Material Variants  and Generate the Procurement Proposals to fullfill these requirements (MD02) in the form of Planned order  we are unable to pass one the Characterisitcs values to planned orders of  lower level Components of Material Variants .These characterisitc values are Used as Manufacturing Instructions and should be passed on to the Lower level of Material Variants through the use of dependencies in Configuration profile .but the problem is it works in CU50 and does not flow in planned orders , does any body have a solution for this ?
    Thanks In Advance
    awaiting reply
    Milind

    Hi Milind,
    I check that you implement a Note which allows the Multi level Configuration of Material Variants? is it sap note? mind to share the number.
    I ever faced this problems to before but fortunately the case in simpler so i just create another variant and maintain the component for the variant. For example : characteristic color. I create variant with color red black etc. For variant red, maintain component red. For variant black maintain component black, so on. Is it possible for your case?
    Regards,
    Arman

  • Material Variant of a Config Material to take Charac. Values from Sales Ord

    Hello Guys,
    Is there any way to have a Material Variant for a Configurable Material to take the Characteristic values from a Sales Order instead of Material Master ?
    I understand by default Material Variant has fixed characteristic values and is taken from material master......
    however here is the situation am in.......
    I have a completely MTO scenario where we will making the product from scratch only after we know the characteristic values.......however our Costing Guys want to do standard cost estimate for the Configurable Material somehow......they were able to do Cost Rollup by making the Configurable Material itself as the Material variant of itself (assigning the same Configurable Material # in MRP3 view)............however this broke my design of taking characteristics from the Sales Order...because the Configurable Material is now behaving as Material Variant and taking the default characteristic values from the Material Master....
    Note: Our Costing guys donot want to cost settlement at Sales Order level.
    Regards,
    BRN.

    I had exactly the same problem. (configuration "blocked" in SO because the use of material variants for PC purposes...)
    SAP help says : To allow you to change the configuration of material variants in the sales order, the Configuration allowed or required indicator must be set in Customizing for Sales and Distribution. The requirements class is determined using the strategy group and requirements type defined in the material master.
    The req. class parameter, mentioned not very clearly by the SAP help, that allows changing the characteristic values of a material variant during the SO configuration is V_T459K-KONFI and value must be either * or +
    Hint: A quick check can be done In the SO entry: go to the procurement tab and replace your requirement type by KEL, you'll see that configuration is "open" 
    Hope this helps
    Iñaki
    Edited by: InakiGonzalez on May 11, 2009 8:08 PM
    Edited by: InakiGonzalez on May 11, 2009 8:15 PM

  • Sales Contract with Material Variant at Sales Order

    We are producing fabric and using make to order in SAP. Our customer give us a commitment with qty and a fixed price for certain fabric in advance, then later they release order to us with specific qty per color. We want to use Sales Contract for the customer commitment and sales order when the customer release the order with color qty to us.  We are putting color in the sales order in the material variant. However we are facing the following problem:
    1. Let say we have a contract 1 with 100,000 yds of material A. 
    2. then we have a sales order 2 of 20,000 yds of material A with color Blue refering to contract1.
    3. Somehow our factory over produced Material A color blue total 25,000 yds.
    4. Then we have another sales order 3 of 5,000 yds of material A with color RED referring to contract 1.
    5. MRP does not create plan order for RED material A because it is showing customer stock 25,000 with contract 1 and 20,000 consume by sales order 2 and 5,000 extra.  however these 5,000 extra is blue is not red and cannot fulfill sales order 3.
    Any idea how to solve this problem?
    Tks,
    Calvin Ngan

    Hi Calvin,
    I think if you define your material as configurable, it can solve your problem.
    A car, for example, has a large number of options that need to be described wheras the order is created only at a model and variant level. Then you define values for characteristics, to allow you to select specific options, such as 'black' for paint.
    So in your case you need to define characteristics of colour(or texture or thickness) or whatever differentiates each output and add optins for each of them.
    These are asked for and stored both in your reciepts(stocks, Prod. orders, POs etc) and in your requirements(SO etc). Also MRP will differentiate between each characteristics while planning.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks & Regards
    Santanu Dawn

  • How to create Material variant

    Dear all,
    I created configurable material and assigned class and BOM and object dependencies as well as configurable profile its working fine.
    I need to create material variant so i assigned configurable material to material variant in MRP 3 view then selected the characterstics as per requirement. BOM also i assigned the configurable material. But at the time planning its not planning as per requirement also i need to consume the stock as per configuration at the time of sales order delivery.
    What are all steps to be followed, where i did mistake pls correct me.
    Regards,
    S.Suresh.

    Dear Mohan,
    Thanks for your response.
    I am very clear  in configurable material  we can use only sales order. I did in my projects no issues.
    But material variant i have doubt, I tried once am not able get what i suppose to get.
    I read the sap help.From that what i understood  we can create PIR for material variant and can make stock thorugh the  order it will consume only whatever we selected from MRP 3 configurable material.
    If i make sales order for configurable material if the material variant and configurable material properties are same it will pick the stock. (For that in sales order item category (mat variant action) to be set).
    1.  Configure the configurable material in the sales order.
           2.      On the value assignment screen, you can already check whether material variants match the material configuration (see Variant Matching on the Value Assignment Screen).
    For a material to be replaced by the material variant in the sales order, the configuration of both materials must match exactly.
           3.      When you have configured the material, exit the configuration editor.
           4.      Depending on the settings in Customizing, the material is either replaced directly by the material variant, or a message is displayed indicating that a suitable material variant has been found.
           5.      If the material is replaced, the material variant is entered in the order item.
    Individual or collective requirements can be created for the material variant. Pricing is also carried out for the material variant, provided that you have not defined the configurable material as a pricing reference material for the material variant.
    So i have doubt on material variant only if  wrong pls correct.
    Regards,
    S.Suresh.

  • ( error no CK 465)  No price could be determined for the material

    Hi,
    While costing for a material i am getting the error messages as folloows
    1) No price could be determined for the material   error no CK 465
    2)Cost component split costed with value of zero  CK240
    Materail procurement type is F - External procurement  so i hope no need BOM and routing , they were not created.
    Material has price control indicator - S
    Material type - ZVAR (Finished product variant)
              What could be the reason for this error and what is the solution
    THannks & regds
    Ramachandra

    Hi Experts,
    I also got the same error how to solve it.
    Many materials costed with errors how to resolve those.
    Error Messages are: 465,240,322,597,168
    Please let me know the solution.
    I have Run the cycle on 29-02-2012, Today i.e 0n 01-03-2012 MM consultant wants to close the period of February.
    Is it required to resolve the errors before closing the february period?
    Can we resolve the errors after closure of the period.
    Please guide me. Most urgent
    Jyoshna

Maybe you are looking for