Difference with GL Accounts

Hi,
There are some GL Acoounts is getting debit for some of the wageypes since those are considerd as Expences to the Organization.
But some times again these wage types are hitting same GL Accounts as credit for the some PERNRs..
We wanted to know why it is happening... Can any give us some light on this..
Regs,
Brahma

Hi,
First of all check configuration of concerned wage type in table V_T52EL. I suspect it is posted to both G/L and Expense account.
Why you don't see G/L and Expense for every employee? I think because they are balanced, i.e. equal to zero. The G/L or Expense account in not exported with posting.
For example, check those employee who have only expense account as a result of this wage type. Go through all postin details and try to find debitted amounts to the same G/L account. Debit will balance credit, thus G/L will not be generated in posting.
Cheers

Similar Messages

  • F.01 Difference with GL Account

    Hi All,
    Can any one help for finding the difference between F.01 & GL Account Balance.As I am getting this difference for my closed period. GL Account shows NIL balance whereas F.01 shows balance in that particular account,specifically for Excise Accounts.
    Regards
    Mukesh

    Hi Mukesh,
    Some times tables not update some transactions.that is reason balance difference will come.
    Go to SA38, run SAPF170 or SAPF190.Fill the required fields and select check boxes Document transcation figures and Index transaction figures.if u this programme system shows some documents,which is not updated in tables.based on that u have to pass rectification entries.
    Regards
    Rams

  • How to deal with the product price difference g/l account

    Hi:
    When I went to the transaction fs10n to look at the g/l account 281500(gain from own product price differences) and I found there has 40 EUR in credit column,then the cumulative balance is credit 40 EUR,obviously this 40 EUR credit is due to the difference between order price and invoice price. My question is how to deal with it?

    The Finance department needs to coordinate it with the Purchasing on the correct price. If the invoice price is the correct one, then there is a need to recognize the difference as per accounting standard. If in case that the order price is the correct one, they should inform the Vendor about it and once the Debit or Credit note is received, you just need to post it as "subsequent debit or credit" the amount will offset to this price difference.

  • What is difference between Reconciliation Account and Revenue account.?`

    What is difference between Reconciliation Account and Revenue account.?
    Where does it effects after a sales order , delivery doc. or billing doc.?

    Hello Mukesh the comments givan by Amol and Siva kumar are correct.
    Here I am telling you how these accouts arer wrking in sales order and at billing and delivery.
    Our reconsilation account is reconsile with customer that why when you create the sales order you are mentioning the customer at this time reconsiation account works.
    Whenever you doing any posting there is an accounting entry is mae in accounts book right .
    At the time of Delivery and billing both the accounts are affected as per the accounting rule .
    I hpoe this will you help you
    Regards
    ravi

  • Currency translation differences with an effect on earnings

    Product Version: SAP R/3 46.C
    Componente: EC-CS-CSF-E Currency Translation
    In currency translation program of ECCS (tx CX40) the prior year portion of translation differences that affects earnings is posted in current period in the earnings retain item (ER) which according to SAP documentation "Currency translation differences with subsequent consolidations" is correct, however when we run the currency translation on subsequents periods this amount is posted again generating a multiplying of differences on each period.
    In accordance with section u201CBu201D of SAP note 553586, the carryforward item (retain earnings) was assigned to translation key 5, to avoid multiplications of this difference in every execution of currency translation for current period. This correction was applied successfully, however the problem is now generated when we run the currency translation in every subsequent period.
    SAP notes 582815 and 553586 was applied succesfully.
    We also verified SAP note 1045402 changing the translation key 5 to 1, for balance carryforward item (retained earnings) this avoids the difference effect on subsequents periods, but  generates a translation differential effect undesired on this item, since this is a historical item that not must be altered by currency translation.
    Additionally we read SAP note 509509 and we think that this issue corresponds whit symptom 2 of that note.
    Step by Step:
    Transaction: CX40
    Setting of Translation SET in translation method:
    1.- MARS-GAP-Monetary:
    1.1.- Items of balance sheet
    1.2.- Translation Key 1
    1.3.-  Item for differences: income statement item with an effect on earnings
    2.- MARS-GAP-NonMonetary
    2.1.- Items of balance sheet
    2.2.- Translation Key 6
    2.3.-  Item for differences: income statement item with an effect on earnings
    3.-MARS-MOR-Monetary
    3.1.- Items of P&L
    3.2.- Translation Key 5
    3.3.-  Item for differences: income statement item without an effect on earnings
    4.-MARS-MOR-NonMonetary
    4.1.- Items of P&L
    4.2.- Translation Key 6
    4.3.-  Item for differences: income statement item without an effect on earnings
    5.- MARS-HIST
    5.1.- Items of balance sheet
    5.2.- Translation Key 6
    5.3.-  Item for differences: Balance sheet item without an effect on earnings
    6.- ANI-BS-FX
    6.1.- Items of differences SET MARS-HIST and Carryforward Item for special items in transaction CXD3, the same item for the balance carryforward (retained earnings)
    6.2.- Translation Key 5
    6.3.-  Item for differences: Balance sheet item without an effect on earnings (the same item for the SET MARS-HIST)
    7.- ANI-BS
    7.1.- The special balance sheet item in Transaction CXD3
    7.2.- Translation Key 5
    7.3.-  Item for differences, the same item
    8.- ANI-IS
    8.1.- The special income statement item in Transaction CXD3
    8.2.- Translation Key 5
    8.3.-  Item for differences, The same item
    Note:
    1 .- According to the point A of the note  553586 was included the FS Item 484051011(difference item for SET MARS-HIST)  in the conversion SET ANI-BS-FX
    2 .- According to Section B of the note 553586 was included the account for carried forward  481000001 the special accounts set up in the transaction CXD3 in the conversion SET ANI-BS-FX
    3 .- According to Section C of  note 553586 are included special accounts set up in the transaction CXD3 390000 and 251200, in the conversion SET ANI-IS and ANI-BS respectively.
    When run the currency translation in the new year 1-2011, the prior year portion of translation differences that affects earnings is posted in current period a credit to earnings retain and debit to account difference in SET for this account. This amount is same on special balance sheet item 251200, in tx CXD3, also found on the statistical FS item.
    Then in subsequent periods, 2 - 2011 it posting another credit to earnings retain and debit to account difference in SET for this account, generating a multiplying of differences on each period, even though the difference for this account (ER) in the log of the translation currency is equal to the difference posted to the previous period, show this in transaction CX34 for items of translation (1) for this account until 1-2011.
    Edited by: Ana Brito on Jul 25, 2010 8:10 PM

    Hi,
    just a information how I did a workaround about this:
    The opening (movement type 100) of the balance sheet item "differences of currency translation" is customized with "don't change...".
    Every increase  to "differences  of currency translation" works with e.g. movement type 120 and will be carried forward to 100.
    Maybe this is a scenario you can use...
    BR

  • Accessing shared time capsule disk with two accounts

    Hey guys,
    I have an airport time capsule (5th gen) and want to access a connected USB disk with my Mavericks macbook. This basically works fine: i can mount it using the finder (usually I do an automatic mount when starting my account, since I put the drive into the Login Items for my user), and the disk is secured with a disk password.
    However, I have a quite annoying issue when using two accounts on the same macbook, which is my standard use case as I share the macbook with my wife: Only the user that first accesses the disk can use it, the second user gets a "no access permission" error for the disk. The second user can then disconnect the drive and reconnect, but I find this very annoying, because I have to do it all the time, and I'm wondering if I'm the only user with this problem.
    Is there any way to specify access rights for the drive, such that I can access it with both accounts simultaneously? BTW, I've already tried to define specific access rights on the disk (Context Menu > Get Info > Sharing and Permissions), and I tried to change the disk security mode to "With accounts" and "With device password" - none of it made any difference.

    Only the user that first accesses the disk can use it, the second user gets a "no access permission" error for the disk. The second user can then disconnect the drive and reconnect, but I find this very annoying, because I have to do it all the time, and I'm wondering if I'm the only user with this problem.
    That is how Apple built it. No fixes.. no repairs.. it is a hassle of protected type file systems. Windows you can do all sorts of fudgery.. but the lack of protection (amongst others) is why you use a Mac.
    Is there any way to specify access rights for the drive,
    This is not a rights issues.. it is that one user at a time is allowed. Each user must logout before the next user can gain access..
    I do not know of any workaround.
    Pondini recommends using disk image for data on the TC.. since you can otherwise mess up the TM backup. See http://pondini.org/TM/TCQ3.html
    His comments don't apply to your usage of the USB drive.. but his workaround may help.
    I am wondering if you create the sparsebundle on the USB drive and allow everyone access, once mounted on the computer it might allow two user accounts access at the same time.. Sorry I have no need to try it and I cannot recall anyone attempting.. but it might present a way around the issue.. !!

  • Problem when connection with 2 accounts

    A friend of mine have problem to surf the web when he is connected to the internet.
    The ISP supply him with 2 accounts, and when he surf with the main account, he don't have problem to reach all the site he wish to go.
    But, when he use the second account, some site can't be reachable. This site can be reach when he use the other account. I suggest him to updated his Mac version because the ISP don't find any problem on his side. Other members of the ISP don't have this kind of problem.
    Both account use the same telephon numbers. The only difference is at the ID.
    Any help are welcome.

    The media is not on his account, media is permanently tied to the account is is purchased with.  Same goes with apps. 
    Media and apps can be shared with other accounts.. but it is not tied to those account.
    Unless you are using seperate logins on the computer (not Apple ID's) you will always see all media on the computer in iTunes.
    As for the second question, yes it's possible... how you get the media off the memory card depends on your computer.  If it has a media card reader that will fit his media card, just insert the card and drag the files into iTunes.

  • Packages removed from DP's with machine account

    Hi,
    We have an incident wherein the packages are removed from the DP's with machine account.
    ISSUE: Packages removed from the DP’s.
    The package was successfully copied to all the DP’s on Friday however, today early morning the packages were missing from the DP’s.
    The logs mention the details of package being removed with the “Machine account”.
    SMS Distribution Manager successfully removed package "C00007C5" from distribution point "["Display=\\DP_NAME\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=820"]\\DP_NAME\".
    The only distinguishing factor i could find in the distmgr log shows the below
    STATMSG: ID=2330 SEV=I LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=AUDEMPSSSS01 SITE=806 PID=2232 TID=3872 GMTDATE=Mon Jan 06 01:52:42.099 2014 ISTR0="C00007C5" ISTR1="["Display=\\DP_NAME\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=806"]\\DP_NAME\"
    ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=2 AID0=400 AVAL0="C00007C5" AID1=404 AVAL1="["Display=\\DP_NAME\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=806"]\\DP_NAME\"
    SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 3872 (0x0F20)
    Updating package info for package C00007C5 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    Package C00007C5 does not have a preferred sender. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    Sent package server list to parent site R08 for package C00007C5 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    StoredPkgVersion (2) of package C00007C5. StoredPkgVersion in database is 2. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    SourceVersion (3) of package C00007C5. SourceVersion in database is 3. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    STATMSG: ID=2301 SEV=I LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=AUDEMPSSSS01 SITE=806 PID=2232 TID=5128 GMTDATE=Mon Jan 06 01:52:42.114 2014 ISTR0="Update Default User Account Picture" ISTR1="C00007C5"
    ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=1 AID0=400 AVAL0="C00007C5" SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    Why was this package removed from DP??
    System Security analyst at CapG

    The Status message shows this way
    "SMS Distribution Manager successfully removed package "C00007C5" from distribution point "["Display=\\DP_NAME\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=820"]\\DP_NAME\"."
    And under the distmgr log,
    Updating package info for package C00007C5 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    Package C00007C5 does not have a preferred sender. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    Sent package server list to parent site R08 for package C00007C5 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    StoredPkgVersion (2) of package C00007C5. StoredPkgVersion in database is 2. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    SourceVersion (3) of package C00007C5. SourceVersion in database is 3. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    STATMSG: ID=2301 SEV=I LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=AUDEMPSSSS01 SITE=806 PID=2232 TID=5128 GMTDATE=Mon Jan 06 01:52:42.114 2014 ISTR0="Update Default User Account Picture" ISTR1="C00007C5" ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5=""
    ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=1 AID0=400 AVAL0="C00007C5" SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 1/6/2014 12:52:42 PM 5128 (0x1408)
    I can see the packages were removed with "Machine account"
    Why did the machine account delete the package from the DP's?
    Does the difference in DB version and Source version of the package make any difference???
    System Security analyst at CapG

  • Exchange rate differences  for GL Account Bank clearing

    Dear Experts
    when I run revaluation with exchange rate differences  for Gl account bank clearing, why incoming payment transaction do not include in the calculation ? because of this, the balance have the wrong value
    really appreciate your help
    Best regards
    JeiMing

    Hello JeiMing,
    Please reference to the following Note at link https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1041007 for a detailed explaination on this Exchange Rate difference issue.
    Hope this is helpful.
    Regards,
    Xu Zhang
    SAP Business One Forums Team

  • Acct determination for Materials management small differences with keys

    Dear all,
    While posting a document in MIRO, it throws error as 'Acct determination for Materials management small differences with keys not defined in ch/acts'.
    Please advise a solution to rectify this error.
    Regards,
    Vijay

    Hi,
    It seems due to small differences between debit and credit side you are not able to post the document price differences). Check all the data to create an entry first and  Check the data format. Can you check  in OBYC is there a way  to  have a transaction DIF (Materials management small differences) post to different GL accounts based on valaution class (plant)?

  • Accumulated depreciation in FA not tally with GL account

    Hi Expert,
    We have a issue for the Accumulated depreciation in FA not tally with GL account. The amount for the accumulated depreciation in the GL initially uploaded (amount not correct difference by 1cents) is not tally with fixed asset module. We unable to adjust the amount due to the accumulated depreciation GL account is set to "Recon. account for acct type- A Asset". Standard SAP is not allowed us to change the error message to warning message.
    Any idea how to settle this issue?

    Hi Janet,
    Use the transaction ABF1 PK 70 and 75 fill in the g/l account from the asset and  TType 100. Don't fill in asset number.
    Give only for this case authorization for ABF1 when the values are ok take away this authorization

  • No logon possible with "Administrator" Account

    Hi,
    since a few weeks it's not possible for me to log on with the Administrator account via the Explorer like http://<server>:<port>/irj or /nwa or /useradmin etc.
    It's still possible to log on at the visual Administrator with the Administrator account.
    But when i want to log on to the portal (/irj) the logon mask appears again after correct logon.
    If I want to use an other account for logon after trying to logon with administrator account the message comes up, that "Authentication failed. User is already authenticated as a different user."
    We are using EP 7.0 SPS 23 incl. actual patches.
    User store is the UME DB + LDAP (read access)
    Thanks in advance!
    Kind regards
    Roland

    Hi Anja,
    yeah i just checked out the note. But it doesn't fit to me. I neither get the mentioned error in the traces nor do i have a problem connection with other users except the ones with "administrator" in their name.
    Additional info: I have the problem throughout my Portallandscape. So dev, qas and productive engine are affected. So it would be a big coincidence that all three ticketstores are corrupt or something like that.
    Thanks anyway!
    Kind regards
    add. info:
    I had a look what's in the security log of a portal system where the logon with the user "administrator" works and what's in the security log of the portals where i get the logon screen again.
    Portal where it works:
    LOGIN.OK
    User: Administrator
    Authentication Stack: ticket
    Login Module                                                               Flag        Initialize  Login      Commit     Abort      Details
    1. com.sap.security.core.server.jaas.EvaluateTicketLoginModule             SUFFICIENT  ok          false      false                
    2. com.sap.engine.services.security.server.jaas.BasicPasswordLoginModule   REQUISITE   ok          true       true                 
    3. com.sap.security.core.server.jaas.CreateTicketLoginModule               OPTIONAL    ok          true       true                 
    Central Checks                                                                                true
    Portal where it doesn't work:
    LOGIN.OK
    User: Administrator
    Authentication Stack: ticket
    Login Module                                                               Flag        Initialize  Login      Commit     Abort      Details
    1. com.sap.security.core.server.jaas.EvaluateTicketLoginModule             SUFFICIENT  ok          false      false                
    2. com.sap.engine.services.security.server.jaas.BasicPasswordLoginModule   REQUISITE   ok          true       true                 
    3. com.sap.security.core.server.jaas.CreateTicketLoginModule               OPTIONAL    ok          true       false                
    Central Checks                                                                                true
    So you can see at the "createTicketLoginModule"        is the difference ==> ok true true | ok true false
    Roland
    Edited by: Roland Brandstetter on Sep 29, 2011 1:16 PM

  • Seperate Document Row with same account  when post GL

    Hello everyone
    How I can seperate Document Row with same account  when post GL
    because If I post dcoument that  have many rows but same account and difference detail. It will sum amount for same account in JE
    and I found that will seperate if it has diference project code but it's not enough for me.
    How I can config SAP B1 to seperate Doc row when post to JE if it has difference detail (as userfield or standard filed)
    Sorry for my poor english
    Thank,Seang

    Hello Suthee,
    Sorry to tell you, it is not possible to do so in current B1 without addon development.
    There are 2 alternative.
    1.Consulting Workaround:
    Seperate the Item into 2 items, the account into 2 sub accounts.e.g.
    Item A => Item A01 and A02
    G/L Account 1001 => Sub Account 100101 and 100102
    2.AddOn development to seperate the JE just after it is created document
    You can update to JE to seperate just after JE are created by docuemnts.
    Just Listen FormDataAdd Event.
    Sample Code:
    Private Sub FormDataEventHandler( _
        ByRef BusinessObjectInfo As SAPbouiCOM.BusinessObjectInfo, _
        ByRef BubbleEvent As Boolean) Handles oApp.FormDataEvent
            'I just listen 133 - AR invoice here,
            'You may add the target documents
            'Before action = true, start the transation
            If BusinessObjectInfo.FormTypeEx = "133" _
                    And (BusinessObjectInfo.EventType = SAPbouiCOM.BoEventTypes.et_FORM_DATA_ADD _
                    Or BusinessObjectInfo.EventType = SAPbouiCOM.BoEventTypes.et_FORM_DATA_UPDATE) _
                    And BusinessObjectInfo.BeforeAction = True Then
                oCompany.StartTransaction()
            End If
            'Before Action = false,
            'Update the JE in document
            'Succeed, commit, otherwise rollback
            If BusinessObjectInfo.FormTypeEx = "133" _
            And (BusinessObjectInfo.EventType = SAPbouiCOM.BoEventTypes.et_FORM_DATA_ADD _
            Or BusinessObjectInfo.EventType = SAPbouiCOM.BoEventTypes.et_FORM_DATA_UPDATE) Then
                If BusinessObjectInfo.BeforeAction = False And BusinessObjectInfo.ActionSuccess Then
                    Dim xmlDoc As System.Xml.XmlDocument = New System.Xml.XmlDocument
                    xmlDoc.LoadXml(BusinessObjectInfo.ObjectKey)
                    Dim objectKey As String
                    objectKey = xmlDoc.SelectSingleNode("//DocEntry").InnerText
                    Dim oDocument As SAPbobsCOM.Documents = Nothing
                    oDocument = oCompany.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oPurchaseOrders)
                    If oDocument.GetByKey(CInt(objectKey)) Then
                        Dim oJE As SAPbobsCOM.JournalEntries
                        oJE = oCompany.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oJournalEntries)
                        If oJE.GetByKey(oDocument.TransNum) Then
                            '*Add you code to Update oJE lines here*
                            lRetCode = oJE.Update
                            If 0 <> lRetCode Then
                                oApp.MessageBox("Failed to update JE")
                                'roll back the whole transaction, including the document
                                oCompany.EndTransaction(SAPbobsCOM.BoWfTransOpt.wf_RollBack)
                                Exit Sub
                            Else
                                'Commit the transaction
                                oCompany.EndTransaction(SAPbobsCOM.BoWfTransOpt.wf_Commit)
                            End If
                        End If
                    End If
                End If
            End If
        End Sub
    Hope it helps. Thanks.
    Kind Regards
    -Yatsea

  • CT differences with Effect to Net income

    Hi,
    I am running CT for the current month i.e July 2010.
    For one of the company code (9019), it was showing two steps under differences as below:
    CT differences without having effect on Net income: XXX amount
    CT differences with EFFECT on net income 1200 USD
    Our group currency is USD
    For all the months it will have postings like above, but with effect on NET income will be negligible i.e. always less than 1 USD. so there is no issue.
    Now when I look into the balances using total records, the PNL items (All accounts) are equal to Zero in LC.
    But In GC is showing the balance which is equal to USD 1200, exactly same amount as "CT differences with EFFECT on net income "
    Could someone explain what is CT difference with effect of Net income and why PNL items in GC are not equal to zero.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Richard.

    Hi Dan,
    The issue is resolved after following the steps provided by you.
    Also i have done one more mistake of assigning  account type balance sheet instead of PNL in fs item, so it was mis leading the results.
    In fact the issue is because of wrong accont type. But the solution provided by you works 100% but in the next period again i faced the same issue.
    After correcting the account type the issue is resolved. Also executed previous month process again for better reporting.
    Thanks a lot for your help provided. In the entire project you have helped a lot.
    Many thanks for your support.
    Regards,
    Richard

  • Post exchange rate differences to separate account on invoice verification

    Dear expert,
    I'm facing a problem and need your guidance related to exchange rate differences between Goods Receipt and Invoice verification caused by time differences
    My company buy an asset using purchase order with account assignment.
    As an example:
      Asset price on PO      : 100 USD
    On Good receipt (Exchange rate 1 USD = 9,000 Rp)
    Journal created
      Asset                             900,000 Rp
         GR/IR Clearing                900,000 Rp
    On Invoice verification (Exchange rate 1 USD = 10,000 Rp)
    Journal created
    GR/IR Clearing                  900,000 Rp
    Asset                               100,000 Rp  (Exchange rate differences)
        Vendor                             1,000,000 Rp
    My Company wants to put "Exchange rate differences" into separate account (Gain/Loss realized account) instead throw it on asset because asset value would be change. How make it happend?
    I already try to configure KDM (Exchange rate differences) and OB09 and still exchange rate differences posted into asset

    Hi,
    Check config in transaction code Oba1 and Obyc. check posting G/L account of PO (KBS), n try to change in KDR Class.
    Regards
    Sanjeet Kumar

Maybe you are looking for