Differences between SAP Installation Guide and SAP Notes 1634482 & 1881509

Hello all,
we still have problems with activities in TDMS. During searching for solutions I found two SAP Notes 1634482 & 1881509 which contain entirely other information as installation guide from SAP.
SAP guide indicates that the roles  SAP_TDMS_MASTER_CR and SAP_TDMS_RFC_USER_700_CR are enough to execute the activities.
But the SAP Notes 1634482 & 1881509 contain another information. For example the notes indicate additionally to another roles, which you will find below:
SAP_TDMS_CONTROL_CENTER_DISPL
SAP_TDMS_SCRAMBLING_USER
SAP_TDMS_SCRAMBLING_EXPERT
SAP_TDMS_SCRAMBLING_BUS_EXPERT
SAP_TDMS_USER
Do I really need the additional roles? Is that all? Do I need to request  another roles additionally?
Thanks in advance and br,
Ilkin

Hello Anita,
the situation is strange. The problem is that the activity "Verification of Execution System" cannot be performed. The status is "Release/Scheduled". In other words "green flag" although I have all necessary roles.
TDMS User - user type "dialog":
In control/central and in execution system "SAP_TDMS_MASTER_CR" which contains the role "SAP_TDMS_SCRAMBLING_ADMIN". 
RFC User - user type "dialog":
In control/central and in execution system "SAP_TDMS_RFC_USER_CR" and "SAP_TDMS_RFC_USER_700".
And a lot of another roles:
SAP_DMIS_TDMS_APPL1
SAP_DMIS_TDMS_APPL2
SAP_DMIS_TDMS_APPL3
SAP_DMIS_TDMS_BASIS
SAP_DMIS_TDMS_BASIS_700
SAP_DMIS_TDMS_RECEIVER
SAP_DMIS_TDMS_SENDER
SAP_TDMS_ACTGROUP_ADMIN
SAP_TDMS_ACTGROUP_DISPLAY_USER
SAP_TDMS_ACTGROUP_EXEC
SAP_TDMS_CONTROL_CENTER
SAP_TDMS_HCM_MASTER
SAP_TDMS_HCM_USER
SAP_TDMS_MASTER
SAP_TDMS_MASTER_CR
SAP_TDMS_SCRAMBLING_ADMIN
SAP_SLOP_MASTER
I am aware that the activity "Verification of Execution System" executed with the background job "CNV_MBT_CNV_TDMS_SCR_CHECK_PROD". But I could not find the job in SM37.
For your attention. I have already installed all necessary SAP notes.
What can be the reason?
BR and thanks in advance,
Ilkin

Similar Messages

  • Difference between Invoice cancellation document and credit note document

    Hello,
    Can anybody highlight the differences between an invoice cancellation document and a credit note document (may be point by point).
    I want to know their difference in SAP point of view.
    Thanks,
    Shankar

    Hi,
    Invoice Cancellation Document (VF11)
    This is basically cancelling-out an existing Invoice, completely.
    Whereas, Credit Note is basically setling down some part payment, which isn't being made or billed in excess to actual invoice amount.
    Example:
    Customer was supposed to be billed with Rs. 100 and got billed with Rs. 110. the payment recieved from customer is Rs. 100. to settle-down oustanding of Rs. 10, one need to create a credit note of Rs. 10 on customer-account.
    Best Regards,
    Amit

  • Difference between using history data and do not

    hi,
    I'm Tran, I come from VietNam.
    I've just learned LabView, I dont know the difference between using history data ( propety note of waveform chart ) and do not.
    please help me. And give me an example in labview or give me some document of this problem!!
    Tran
    thanks!!!

    aloalo wrote:
    I dont know the difference between using history data ( propety note of waveform chart ) and do not.
    Your question isn't clear, but I would like to say that, I've many times used this particular property node for clear the data (graph) from the chart.
    I am not allergic to Kudos, in fact I love Kudos.
     Make your LabVIEW experience more CONVENIENT.
    Attachments:
    Example - Using HISTORY PN [LV 80].vi ‏16 KB

  • Difference between Ecc 5.0 and Ecc 6.0 SAP note number

    Hello Friends,
    Is any one knows difference between Ecc 5.0 and Ecc 6.0 version released SAP notes for FICO module.
    Thanks in advance for your help
    Thanks,
    Ratnam

    Hi,
    Check these
    Technical difference between 4.7 and ECC 5.0
    difference between sapr/3 4.7 and sapr/3 ecc 5.0
    Differences b/n 4.6c,4.7 and ECC 5.0
    Regards
    vijay

  • Difference between SAP 4.7 and ECC 5.0

    hi frnds
    .what is the difference between SAP 4.7 and ECC 5.0?
    regards

    Hi,
    Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned
    Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
    u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
    u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
    u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
    Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
    u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
    u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
    u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
    u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
    Goods receipt
    Goods issue
    Transfer posting
    Remove from storage
    u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
    New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
    u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
    u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
    u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
    u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
    u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
    Requirement prioritizations in materials management
    u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
    u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
    Mass maintenance of outline agreements
    The following two transactions available:
    u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
    u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
    Commitment plan for purchase contracts
    u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
    u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
    u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
    u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
    u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
    u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
    u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
    u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
    u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
    u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
    Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
    u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
    u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
    To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
    Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
    u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
    Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
    Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
    External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
    User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
    Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
    The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
    Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
    The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
    107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
    109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
    Prepayment of invoices
    This functionality is characterized as follows:
    u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
    u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
    u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
    u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
    u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
    u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
    u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
    u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
    u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
    Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
    u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
    u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
    Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
    u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
    u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
    u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
    u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
    u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
    Parking service items
    It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
    Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
    u2022 This Report is available with u201CNon-Hierarchyu201D display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
    u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
    Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
    u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
    u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
    u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
    u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location
    Regards
    Priyanka.P
    AWARD IF HELPFULL

  • What is difference between SAP R3 And SAP IS Mills Product

    HI Friends
    What is difference between SAP R3 And SAP IS Mills Product
    What are the futures are availables in IS MIlls
    Regards

    Hi,
    SAP R/3 is the central enterprise version. It is not specifically designed for any inducstry sectors and it can cater many of the industry types.
    Is is developed for specific industries an for SMB's (small and medium business). It will have components specifically for the industry.
    The SAP Mill Products component adds sector-specific functionality to an ERP system to satisfy the complex requirements of mill industries (e.g. metal, wood, paper, textiles, construction materials, and cable sectors).
    These industry segments differ from others primarily in that the materials used have a large number of characteristics and variants. The materials in the segments listed above are also predominantly area-based (e.g. paper, textiles, plastic film) or length-based (e.g. cables, piping). Account must be taken of these material characteristics throughout the entire supply chain.
    To cater for the particularities of these industry segments, SAP Mill Products features processes and functions that cover the entire supply-chain cycle – from product design and configuration, through planning, order processing, capacity planning and production, to final delivery. Additional functions are available in costing and inventory management. SAP Mill Products are also integrated into Quality Management, Financial Accounting, and Controlling.
    Prase

  • Difference between SAP Business Workflow and CRM Workflow

    Hello guys,
    Is there any difference between SAP Business Workflow and CRM Workflow?
    Are there others workflows types in SAP?
    In all SAP Workflow Courses (BIT600, BIT601, BIT603, BIT610) only was talked about SAP Business Workflow, and nothing about CRM Workflow.
    Thanks a lot!
    Kleber

    Hello Kleber,
    There is not much of the differance between CRM workflows and SAP Business  workflows..
    Workflows are esentially part of Basis (BC) components and hence its the same across all SAP products as all these products have components of Basis(BC) in them...
    To Conclude, SAP Busines workflows and CRM workflows are the same things... However when you work on CRM, the BOR objects would be belonging to CRM and not to ECC... However conceptwise , there in no change at all.. If you learn BIT100......, you can also work on CRM workflows..
    Regards,
    Anand

  • Difference Between SAP ECC. 6.0 and 4.6c

    Hi
    What is the Difference Between SAP ECC. 6.0 and 4.6c
    with respect to module wise, like SD, MM, FI,
    thanks
    Satish

    Hi,
    There is lot difference between 4.6c and 6.0
    1) ecc 6.0 coming with inbuild webdynpro , BSP it is not 4.6c
    2) In ecc we have interactive forms concept where it was not there in 4.6c
    3) 4.6c there is no unicode concept here we have unicode and non unicode
    You can follow the link also
    difference between SAP 4.6C and SAP ECC6.0
    Rgds,
    Suman

  • Difference between SAP CRM Security and SAP ECC 6.0 security

    Hi
    I have extensively worked on SAP ECC security but haven't have chance to work on CRM Security.
    Can anyone please let me know the difference between CRM security compared to  ECC security.
    Thanks...

    I am sorry to say, but instead of giving the guy a decent answer you are starting a fight or discussion about stupid forum points...
    really sad.....
    The big  difference between SAP ECC and SAP CRM Security (up to release 5.0) was the following:
    1) For sure there are very different transaction codes in SAP CRM as compared to SAP ECC in the first place
    2)  If you are familiar with R/3 or ECC authorizations; then you know that already on transaction code level, the 'allowed activity' is controlled on tcode level , whereas in SAP CRM , in most cases the 'allowed activity is not controlled by the Transaction code, but on authorization object level....
    E.g. transaction code BP allows you to create/change/display  any type of Business Partner (e.g; sold-to/ship-to/contact person/employee/customer) which is based on the business partner ROLE concept.... anyway...you can control the allowed activity based on different authorization objects.....
    another example is business transaction processing...which can be launched by:
    a very generic transaction code: CRMD_ORDER
    transaction category related transaction codes :e.g.
          > CRMD_BUS2000126 for activity management
          > CRMD_BUS200115 for Sales processes
    Again...allowed activity is not controlled by the tcode, but on authorization object level...
    3) As of the new WEBCLIENT UI (which is valid as of release CRM2006s/CRM2007/CRM7.0) SAP also invented an extra authorization layer, which is UI COMPONENT LEVEL and logical links....  controlled by object UIU_COMP.
    However, they also introduced the BUSINESS ROLE Concept (e.g; SALESPRO/MARKETINGPRO/...) which defines actually the functionalities, navigation bar, screen configuration, logical links you can use/see within the new WEBclient UI.
    Another thing is that instead of using TRANSACTION CODES, as of these new releases, you are actually using 'external services'....so you do not authorize on tcodes basically....but the logic between tcodes and external services in relation to the authorization objects that are checked is more or less the same....
    STANDARD authorization setup in the new WEBUI client is therefore controlled by both backend authorizations (not UIU component related) and the UIU_COMP (restricting access to workcenters/logical links/...)
    4) Additionally SAP also provides a concept called ACE (which stand for ACCES CONTROL ENGINE)....
    This requires a bit of customizing...and the rest is more or less pure customer development, as you will create your own methods where you'll define a logic which dynamically will verify what kind of access you have for an object....
    You should now that ACE is actually implemented on top of your 'normal' sap crm security setup....
    cheers
    Davy Pelssers

  • Difference between SAP NetWeaver Gateway 2.0 and SAP NetWeaver Gateway productivity accelerator for Microsoft

    Hi Experts ,
    Can anyone tell me the difference between SAP NetWeaver Gateway 2.0 and SAP NetWeaver Gateway productivity accelerator for Microsoft ?
    Best Regards,
    SK

    SAP  Netweaver Gateway 2.0 is a product for Exposing ERP data as OData for external consumption which is independent of any Microsoft product. Using this you can model OData services and Expose them for light weight consumption. You can use this in use cases where  you just want to consume the OData in some client or so, and you do not want any kind of accelerators to help you in development or in your integration.
    GWPAM is an interoperability framework from SAP that leverages SAP NetWeaver Gateway and Microsoft technologies enabling customers and partners to easily and quickly compose solutions that consume and extend SAP throughout Microsoft technologies for on premise and on demand deployment. With GWPAM you get components like
    GWPAM Visual Studio Add-On,GWPAM Template,GWPAM Project,GWPAM Outlook Add-In which are very much Microsoft specific.

  • What is the major differences between SAP CRM 4.0 and SAP CRM 5.0?

    Dear all,
    Please let me know the major differences between CRM 4.0 and CRM 5.0 versions?
    Your suggestions will be highly appreciated.
    Thank you
    Raghu ram

    Hi Raghu,
    In order to find out the differences between SAP CRM 4.0 and SAP CRM 5.0, you will find no better documentation than the release notes availalble at the following link:
    [https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000429833&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&]
    There are several functional improvements, and lot of new functionalites and also better integaration points with SAP ECC. Some of the new features like Visit Planning, Warrenty Claims, Enhanced and easy configurable/ customizable IC Webclient, New concept of Marketing Organization in Org Model. For further information, go through the release notes.
    regards
    Srikantan

  • *what is the difference between web flow engine and sap business workflow?*

    Hi,
    Can any please guide me by telling what is the difference between web flow engine and sap business workflow?

    >
    Arghadip Kar wrote:
    > Check this link
    >
    > http://www.workflowing.com/id35.htm#1__what_is_the_difference_between
    ... which is exactly where the FAQ item came from!

  • Difference between SAP-CRM 2007 UI and previous version UI.

    hi,
    anyone knows the differences difference between SAP-CRM 2007 UI and previous version UI.
    anykind of links or files are helpful.
    regards.
    raman.

    Hi,
    actually quite a late response and I think all the rather technically focuses comments have already been given, incl. the link to a really good slide deck, that explains all the technical architecture details on what exactly we did.
    From an end user perspective some other statements on what we did:
    (1) From an information architecture and visualization perspective we acted based on feedback from our customers in the last years, which led to some restructuring of the screen, e.g. moving the navigation bar from the top area of the screen (horizontal) to the left hand side --> sounds simple but users tend to have problem seeing thing at the top of the screen. We also decided to arrange the information for e.g. an account or an opportunity not in a tab oriented format. Again usability tests in CRM had shown that users often find it hard to see and understand that tabs contain additional information. We now show the details in assignment blocks below the header information in a scrollable format. Vertical scrolling is a behavior of a screen that most users know from their internet experience. Those are just two exampels of what we did in this area
    (2) We also have put a large focus on well known web behaviors, like drag & drop and personalization in general, knowing that on the one hand side, no matter what standard UI we deliver, users tend to adapt it exactly based on their needs and wishes. So you will find really easy to understand personalization options everywhere in the new CRM Web Client UI. To achieve this we used lots of web 2.0 techologies that enable especially these easy interactive capabilitites.
    (3) Finally, and this relates directly to the arguments mentioned in (2) we focused as well on really easy UI configuration. Again, in every customer project user interface changes are made, to adapt the SAP default to the customers needs. here we invested a lot to make the 60-80% most common UI changes done in projects as easy as possible, that even non-technical people can generally do it (like Power users).
    Hope this clarifies some arguments what from the users point of view has been done and what the advantages are.
    When you follow the same link as mentioned by Nadine above, you can also find a presentation UI Concept, which explains all the details rather from a users perspective.
    Best regards and enjoy the new UI ..and every feedback is very much welcome, only with your feedback we can improve the solution even more.
    Ingo

  • Difference between SAP CRM and mySAP CRM

    Hi ,
    can anybody tell me the Difference between SAP CRM and mySAP CRM.
    Regards,
    Shaker.

    Personally I have never called it mySAP CRM even though I have worked with SAP CRM since version 2.0C.
    IMHO:  Calling it SAP CRM + numerical version number is lot easier to understand
    If you look at a CRM system the installed component could be one of the following:
    BBPCRM 20C SAP CRM 2.0C
    BBPCRM 300 SAP CRM 3.0
    BBPCRM 310 SAP CRM 3.1
    BBPCRM 400 SAP CRM 4.0 / mySAP CRM 2004
    BBPCRM 500 SAP CRM 5.0 / mySAP CRM 2005
    BBPCRM 510 SAP CRM 2006s(1)
    BBPCRM 520 SAP CRM 2006s(2)
    BBPCRM 600 SAP CRM 2007 / SAP CRM 6.0
    BBPCRM 700 SAP CRM 7.0
    I'm not sure about some of the other versions.. but I believe that covers most.
    Take care,
    Stephen

  • Difference Between SAP R/3 and SAP CRM

    hi firends,
    Iam new to the SAP world.What is the difference between
    SAP R/3 and SAP CRM.
    What are the additional services provided by the SAP CRM?
    How it does differs from R/3?
    Can any one guide me.
    Thanks in Advance
    Ganga Prasad

    Hello,
    I think the best start is to look at the:
    - <a href="http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/crm/featuresfunctions/index.epx">mySAP Customer Relationship Management: Features & Functions</a>
    - <a href="http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/featuresfunctions/index.epx">mySAP ERP: Features & Functions</a>
    also the help at http://help.sap.com/ could be very valuable:
    - <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40sr1/helpdata/en/1a/023d63b8387c4a8dfea6592f3a23a7/frameset.htm">mySAP Customer Relationship Management</a>
    - <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/e1/8e51341a06084de10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm">SAP ERP Central Component, Release 5.0, SR1</a>
    Regards
    Gregor

Maybe you are looking for