Different errors for similar conditions

I have two similar code snippets:
String testString = null;
double testDouble = Double.parseDouble(testString);
AND
String testString = null;
int testInt = Integer.parseInt(testString);
However different exceptions are thrown when compiled and run. The parseDouble method throws a NullPointerException when passed the null. (Reasonable, it's NULL!)
The parseInt, on the other hand, throws a NumberFormatException when passed the null. This makes it difficult (for this newbie) to use a catch to process both statements. The code that originally brought this to light was supposed to 'catch' if the user clicked 'Cancel' on an input dialog, hence the input string would be null. Instead I got the different exceptions.
Ken

If you want a solution then when you call Exception.getMessage() it returns 'null' in both cases. If there is another problem it returns something besides null.

Similar Messages

How to display different form_letters for 2 conditions?

Hi everyone.
I have a new question. I absolutely have no idea on how to do it.
I have prepared a report using form_letter & tabular style.
In the form_letter style report, there is a subject line to the letter.
This subject line should change for a condition.
In the tabular style report, there is a column named as 'TYPE' - [ Cumulative & Non-cumulative ]
There are two subject lines. [ (Subject-1) & (Subject-2) ]
I want to display "Subject -1" when TYPE - Cumulative .
I want to display "Subject -2" when TYPE - Non-Cumulative .
How do i do this?
I want to paste the image regarding this, but i am unable to paste because the 'Insert image' is disabled. How do i insert image?
Thank You.

Hi Vijetha,
Create a formula column named subject , data type is character and widh is 100(based on your subject length you can give).
pl/sql formula is:
function subjectformula return char is
begin
if :type='cumulative' then
return (:subject-1);
else
return (:subject-2);
end if;
end;
In the layout model create a field and call the formula column subject as source.
I think it is helpful to you.

CBO generating different plans for the same data in similar Environments

Hi All
I have been trying to compare an SQL from 2 different but similar environments build of the same hardware specs .The issue I am facing is environment A, the query executes in less than 2 minutes with plan mostly showing full table scans and hash join whereas in environment B(problematic), it times out after 2 hours with an error of unable to extend table space . The statistics are up to date in both environments for both tables and indexes . System parameters are exactly similar(default oracle for except for multiblock_read_count ).
Both Environment have same db parameter for db_file_multiblock_read_count(16), optimizer(refer below),hash_area_size (131072),pga_aggregate_target(1G),db_block_size(8192) etc . SREADTIM, MREADTIM, CPUSPEED, MBRC are all null in aux_stats in both environment because workload was never collected i believe.
Attached is details about the SQL with table stats, SQL and index stats my main concern is CBO generating different plans for the similar data and statistics and same hardware and software specs. Is there any thing else I should consider .I generally see environment B being very slow and always plans tend to nested loops and index scan whereas what we really need is a sensible FTS in many cases. One of the very surprising thing is METER_CONFIG_HEADER below which has just 80 blocks of data is being asked for index scan.
show parameter optimizer
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
**Environment**
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Note: : There are slight difference in the no of records in the attached sheet.However, I wanted to tell that i have tested with exact same data and was getting similar results but I couldn't retain the data untill collecting the details in the attachment
TEST1     COMPARE TABLE LEVE STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME     NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS     LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET     3607425     167760     5/02/2013 22:11
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     3658     80     5/01/2013 0:07
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     32310     496     5/01/2013 0:07
NMI     1899024     33557     18/02/2013 10:55
REGISTER     4830153     101504     18/02/2013 9:57
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     1607456     19137     18/02/2013 15:48
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     5110781     78691     18/02/2013 9:56
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     1425890     42468     18/02/2013 13:54
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME     NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS     LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET     4133939     198570     16/02/2013 10:02
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     3779     80     16/02/2013 10:55
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     33720     510     16/02/2013 10:55
NMI     1969000     33113     16/02/2013 10:58
REGISTER     5837874     120104     16/02/2013 11:05
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     1788152     22325     16/02/2013 11:06
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     6101934     91088     16/02/2013 11:07
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     1447589     43804     16/02/2013 11:11
TEST ITEM 2     COMPARE INDEX STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME     INDEX_NAME     UNIQUENESS     BLEVEL     LEAF_BLOCKS     DISTINCT_KEYS     AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     CLUSTERING_FACTOR     NUM_ROWS
ASSET     IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     9878     67     147     12982     869801     3553095
ASSET     IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     7291     2747     2     639     1755977     3597916
ASSET     SYS_C00102592     UNIQUE     2     12488     3733831     1     1     3726639     3733831
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     SYS_C0092052     UNIQUE     1     12     3670     1     1     3590     3670
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     SYS_C0092074     UNIQUE     1     104     32310     1     1     32132     32310
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID     NONUNIQUE     2     6298     844853     1     2     1964769     1965029
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID_NK     NONUNIQUE     2     6701     1923072     1     1     1922831     1923084
NMI     IDX_NMI_STATS     NONUNIQUE     1     106     4     26     52     211     211
REGISTER     REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM     NONUNIQUE     2     12498     795     15     2899     2304831     4711808
REGISTER     SYS_C00102653     UNIQUE     2     16942     5065660     1     1     5056855     5065660
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3667     1607968     1     1     1607689     1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SDP_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3811     668727     1     2     1606204     1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     SYS_C00102665     UNIQUE     2     5116     1529606     1     1     1528136     1529606
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     SYS_C00102677     UNIQUE     2     17370     5193638     1     1     5193623     5193638
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4406     676523     1     2     1423247     1425890
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     7374     676523     1     2     1458238     1461108
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     SYS_C00102687     UNIQUE     2     4737     1416207     1     1     1415022     1416207
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME     INDEX_NAME     UNIQUENESS     BLEVEL     LEAF_BLOCKS     DISTINCT_KEYS     AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     CLUSTERING_FACTOR     NUM_ROWS
ASSET     IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     8606     121     71     16428     1987833     4162257
ASSET     IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     8432     1780146     1     1     2048170     4162257
ASSET     SYS_C00116157     UNIQUE     2     13597     4162263     1     1     4158759     4162263
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     SYS_C00116570     UNIQUE     1     12     3779     1     1     3734     3779
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     SYS_C00116592     UNIQUE     1     107     33720     1     1     33459     33720
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID     NONUNIQUE     2     6319     683370     1     2     1970460     1971313
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID_NK     NONUNIQUE     2     6597     1971293     1     1     1970771     1971313
NMI     IDX_NMI_STATS     NONUNIQUE     1     98     48     2     4     196     196
REGISTER     REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM     NONUNIQUE     2     15615     1273     12     2109     2685924     5886582
REGISTER     SYS_C00116748     UNIQUE     2     19533     5886582     1     1     5845565     5886582
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4111     1795084     1     1     1758441     1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SDP_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4003     674249     1     2     1787987     1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     SYS_C004520     UNIQUE     2     5864     1795130     1     1     1782147     1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     SYS_C004539     UNIQUE     2     20413     6152850     1     1     6073059     6152850
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3227     660649     1     2     1422572     1447803
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     6399     646257     1     2     1346948     1349993
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     SYS_C00128706     UNIQUE     2     4643     1447946     1     1     1442796     1447946
TEST ITEM 3     COMPARE PLANS
ENVIRONMENT A
Plan hash value: 4109575732
| Id | Operation                       | Name                   | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                        |    13 | 2067 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|   1 | HASH UNIQUE                    |                        |    13 | 2067 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN                     |                        |    13 | 2067 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN                    |                        |     6 |   900 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:04 |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN ANTI              |                        |     1 |   137 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:03 |
|* 5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| NMI                    |     1 |    22 |       |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS              |                        |     1 |   131 |       | 95137   (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 7 |        HASH JOIN                |                        |     1 |   109 |       | 95132   (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 8 |         TABLE ACCESS FULL       | ASSET                  | 36074 | 1021K|       | 38553   (2)| 00:07:43 |
|* 9 |         HASH JOIN               |                        | 90361 | 7059K| 4040K| 56578   (2)| 00:11:19 |
|* 10 |          HASH JOIN              |                        | 52977 | 3414K| 2248K| 50654   (2)| 00:10:08 |
|* 11 |           HASH JOIN             |                        | 39674 | 1782K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 12 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL    | REGISTER               | 39439 | 1232K|       | 22584   (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 13 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL    | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 4206K|    56M|       | 17490   (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 14 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL     | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT |   675K|    12M|       | 9412   (2)| 00:01:53 |
|* 15 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL      | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET      | 1178K|    15M|       | 4262   (2)| 00:00:52 |
|* 16 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN         | IDX_NMI_ID_NK          |     2 |       |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 17 |      VIEW                       |                        | 39674 |   232K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 18 |       HASH JOIN                 |                        | 39674 | 1046K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 19 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL        | REGISTER               | 39439 |   500K|       | 22584   (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 20 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL        | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 4206K|    56M|       | 17490   (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 21 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL           | METER_CONFIG_HEADER    | 3658 | 47554 |       |    19   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 22 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL            | METER_CONFIG_ITEM      | 7590 | 68310 |       |   112   (2)| 00:00:02 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
   3 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
   4 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
   5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
   7 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD" AND "SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
   8 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
   9 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
10 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
11 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
12 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
13 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
18 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
19 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
20 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
22 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
ENVIRONMENT B
Plan hash value: 2826260434
| Id | Operation                            | Name                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|   1 | HASH UNIQUE                         |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN ANTI                     |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN                         |                        |     1 |   176 | 56855   (2)| 00:11:23 |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN                        |                        |     1 |   163 | 36577   (2)| 00:07:19 |
|* 5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     | ASSET                  |     1 |    44 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                   |                        |     1 |   131 | 9834   (2)| 00:01:59 |
|   7 |        NESTED LOOPS                  |                        |     1 |    87 | 9830   (2)| 00:01:58 |
|   8 |         NESTED LOOPS                 |                        |     1 |    74 | 9825   (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 9 |          HASH JOIN                   |                        |     1 |    52 | 9820   (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 10 |           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| METER_CONFIG_HEADER    |     1 |    14 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 |            NESTED LOOPS              |                        |     1 |    33 |   116   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 12 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL        | METER_CONFIG_ITEM      |     1 |    19 |   115   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 13 |             INDEX RANGE SCAN         | SYS_C00116570          |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL          | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT |   723K|    13M| 9699   (2)| 00:01:57 |
|* 15 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | NMI                    |     1 |    22 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IDX_NMI_ID_NK          |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET      |     1 |    13 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN            | IDX_SLA_SDP_SK         |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | REGISTER               | 76113 | 2378K| 26743   (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 21 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL                | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 5095K|    63M| 20245   (2)| 00:04:03 |
| 22 |    VIEW                              |                        | 90889 |   443K| 47021   (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 23 |     HASH JOIN                        |                        | 90889 | 2307K| 47021   (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 24 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | REGISTER               | 76113 |   966K| 26743   (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 25 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 5095K|    63M| 20245   (2)| 00:04:03 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
   3 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK" AND
              "SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
   4 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD")
   5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
   9 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
10 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
12 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
13 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
17 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
18 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
19 - access("SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
20 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
23 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
24 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
25 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:16 PM
Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:18 PM

Hi Paul,
I misread your question initially .The system stats are outdated in both ( same result as seen from aux_stats) .I am not a DBA and do not have access to gather system stats fresh.
select * from sys.aux_stats$
SNAME     PNAME     PVAL1     PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO     STATUS     NULL     COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO     DSTART     NULL     02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO     DSTOP     NULL     02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO     FLAGS     1     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     CPUSPEEDNW     1321.20523     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     IOSEEKTIM     10     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     IOTFRSPEED     4096     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     SREADTIM     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     MREADTIM     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     CPUSPEED     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     MBRC     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     MAXTHR     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     SLAVETHR     NULL     NULL

I am trying to install MasterCollection_CS6_LS16. When I click the install file I get this error message: We've encountered the following issues. Installation on case-sensitive volumes is not supported. Please choose a different volume for installation.

I am trying to install MasterCollection_CS6_LS16. When I double click the install file I get this error message: We've encountered the following issues. Installation on case-sensitive volumes is not supported. Please choose a different volume for installation. What does that mean? How should I proceed?

Hey iraravitz,
Could you please let me know what version of OS are working on.
You might receive this error when you attempt to install on a drive with the HFS+ Case Sensitive file system, which is not supported for installation of Adobe Creative Suite 6.
So, please try installing on a drive that has been formatted with a supported file system.
You might refer the KB doc link mentioned below for the same:
Error "Case-sensitive drives not supported" or similar install error | Mac OS
Let me know if this helps.
Regards,
Anubha

Installation on case-sensitive volumes is not supported. Please choose a different volume for installation. (Error code: 22)

Trying to download creative cloud app and this message pops up. Installation on case-sensitive volumes is not supported. Please choose a different volume for installation. (Error code: 22)

Error "Case-sensitive drives not supported" or similar install error | Mac OS
Mylenium

Error :Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice

Hi
i have maintained excise data for material, after that i have created scheduled agreement with lp and with 0 value private and dummy tax code and delivery schedule is released. Now when i do the goods receipt i am getting error " Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date
Message no. 8I629" can some body can help me.
with regards
Narendra kumar

Hi,
goto tcode fv11 u have to maintained the condition.
first enter the condition type like jmop -
then enter, next screen u have the select the below comination.
select the plant/vendor/material base u have to maintain the conditions.
Thank's
MVS

Same error code for two different errors

I have a simple state machine with a few states, two of which are read ini file and read GPIB data. I also have an error handling state where I would like to handle all errors. Errors are checked for on each iteration of the loop, passed by shift register. However, I can't just unbundle the error cluster and wire the error code to a case structure because if the ini file doesn't exist (error code 7) I want to exit the program. But if I get error 7 from the gpib (Nonexistent GPIB interface) I want the program to continue running. What is the best way to track where the error is coming from so I know how to handle it when two error codes for different errors have the same error code value?
Message Edited by for(imstuck) on 01-27-2010 03:47 PM
CLA, LabVIEW Versions 2010-2013

Another option is to check the existence of the file before opening the config file, then exit the program if nessecary. Relying on error codes might be a bad option.
Ton
Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep www.lvug.nl
My LabVIEW Ideas
LabVIEW, programming like it should be!

There are similar condition for excise duty cess and taxations so which one

there are similar condition for excise duty cess and taxations so which one to be chosed
its so confusing there are many condition in excise duty and many condition for cess
there are also many condition for sales tax vat and others
so which one to be choose
can any body help me...
thanks with regards

Hi,
Which Tax procedure u r following,TAXINJ or TAXINN.
If U are Using TAXINJ.
<b>ED</b>
JMOD     IN A/R BED
JAED     IN: A/R AED
JSED     IN A/R SED
JCES     IN A/R CESS
JEX2     Excise Duty @ 16%(Set off)
JEXA     IN A/R AED   (Set off)
JEXS     IN A/R SED (Set off)
JCED     IN A/R CESS
JECS     A/R EducationCess
JECX     Ed. Cess @ 2% on ED(Set off)
JA1X     A/R Sec & Hr ECS
JA1Y     A/R Sec & Hr ECS
<b>Tax</b>
JIN1     CST
JIN2     VAT
Raghu

Printer stopped working. Different error messages for each application.

Hello. Recently I have been unable to print anything from any application and get different error messages from each application. For example:
Word says "Word cannot print due to a problem with the current printer. Make sure you have a printer selected in Print Canter. You may need to print again or adjust your printer settings."
Entourage says "An error occurred while printing. Not enough memory."
Excel says "Microsoft Excel could not communicate with the printer."
Preview says "Print. Error while printing."
I have tried installing new drivers, repairing the disk and permissions, and deleting and adding the printer from the System Preferences.
I am running OS X 14.4.10 on an iMac G4 1.25 GHz PowerPC with 256 MB DDR SDRAM.
Any ideas? Thanks.

Try downloading the 10.4.10 Combination Updater from Apple and re-update.
If that doesn't help try the free trial of Printer Setup Repair from www.fixamac.net.
If those don't help, reinstall OS X using the Archive & Install option in the installer.

Different prices for ship to(Not Sold to) -?

Hi Experts
Any body please explain the difference between the prices to different Ship - To's.
Ex:
Can I sell a product to different ship to's for different prices?( Like if any customer (one sold )has meny --->ship to's)
Normally any client will sell like that?
Is it psosible by Standard SAP? adding ship-to To access sequence?
Or
Does it supported by any other IS(Industry specific)- sap ?
Any thoughts will be help full!
Thanks
Kris

Yes. You can certainly map the price based on Ship-to-party, instead of Sold-to-party. For this to work, Identify if any satandard table (V/04) is helpful. If yes, you can assign the same to the access sequence (V/07) being used in relevant condition type. If No, then you can generate a new table based on fields available in field catelog & assign the same to the relevant Access Sequence.
Write-up on pricing:
In SD, Pricing Procedure is determined based on Sales Area (Sales Organization + Distribution Centre + Division) + Customer Pricing Procedure + Document Pricing Procedure. Sales Area is determined in Sales Order Header Level. Customer Pricing Procedure is determined from Customer Master. Document Pricing Procedure is determined from Sales Document Type / Billing Type (if configured). Once the pricing procedure is determined, Condition records are fetched. If appropriate condition records are found, the price is determined. If Mandatory pricing condition is missing, system will through an error message.
In SD, the steps to configure Pricing procedure are as under:
Step 1:
Condition table: If existing condition table meets the requirement, we need not create a new condition table. Considering the requirement for new condition table, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Condition Table (select the required fields combination, which will store condition record).
Step 2:
Access Sequence: If existing access sequence meets the requirement, we need not create a new access sequence. Considering the requirement for new sequence, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Access Sequence (Access sequence is made up of Accesses (Tables) & the order of priority in which it is to be accessed. Here we assign the condition table to access sequence.
Step 3:
Condition Type: If existing condition type meets the requirement, we need not create a new condition type. Considering the requirement for new condition type, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Condition Type. It is always recommended to copy an existing similar condition type & make the neccessary changes. Here we assign Access sequence to Condition type.
Step 4:
a. Pricing Procedure: It is recommended to copy a similar pricing procedure & make the neccesary changes in new pricing procedure. Pricing Procedure is a set of condition type & arranged in the sequence in which it has to perform the calculation. Considering the requirement for new Pricing Procedure, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Pricing Procedure --> Maintain Pricing Procedure.
b. Pricing Procedure: After maintaining the pricing procedure the next step will be determination of pricing procedure. Configuration for determining pricing procedure in SPRO is as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Pricing Procedure --> Determine Pricing Procedure.
5. Condition record: Condition record is a master data, which is required to be maintained by Core team / person responsible from the client. During new implementation, the condition records can be uploaded using tools like SCAT, LSMW, etc. Condition Record is maintained in T.Code: VK11 / VK12, which are captured in Sales Order & Billing.
It is assumed that document pricing procedure, customer pricing procedure , ... are in place.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward suitable points.
How to give points: Mark your thread as a question while creating it. In the answers you get, you can assign the points by clicking on the stars to the left. You also get a point yourself for rewarding (one per thread).

I am unable to reinstall Photoshop CS6 (I do have the serial number) on my Macbook Pro 10.9.5 (Mavericks os). and am getting the message "Installation on case-sensitive volumes is not supported. Please choose a different volume for installation." I am f

I am unable to reinstall Photoshop CS6 (I do have the serial number) on my Macbook Pro 10.9.5 (Mavericks os). and am getting the message "Installation on case-sensitive volumes is not supported. Please choose a different volume for installation." I am further told that "Adobe apps cannot be installed on case-sensitive drives, you need to Install the product onto an HFS+ or HFSJ non-case-sensitive drive."
What I don't understand is this: I originally bought and installed Photoshop CS6 back in March 2013, and it worked fine. Yesterday my hard drive had to be replaced and my computer person salvaged as much of what was on it as he could, but now I have to reinstall Photoshop. 1) Why did it work before and it's not working now? 2) Is there anything I can do that does not involve reformatting the hard drive?

It means what it says. The "computer person" formatted it wrongly/ unsuitably. it needs to be formatted again.
Error "Case-sensitive drives not supported" or similar install error | Mac OS
Mylenium

How to use i for if condition in a for i in loop?

Hi friends,
I have a question on how to use i for IF condition in a loop, in order to get an efficient programming and results. Here is outlined SQL:
cursor is
select c1,c2,c3 from table1; -- 100 rows returned.
open cursor
loop
fetch c1,c2,c3 into v1,v2,v3;
for i in 1..3 loop
if 'v'||i between 90 and 100 then
v_grade := 'Excellent';
elsif 'v'||i between 80 and 89 then
elsif 'v'||i between 50 and 59 then
end if;
end loop;
close cursor;
This way, I don't need to use a lot of if..then for hard code v1,v2,v3,.... actually I have more v..
But Oracle gave an error of this usage of 'if 'v'||i' or 'v'||to_char(i).
Thanks for any advice in advance!

user508774 wrote:
Thanks for comments and advices. But I didn't get your inputs clearly. Are you saying I don't need to use PL/SQL to achieve this?Correct. Ronel and John showed you the basic approaches. SQL is not a mere I/O language for making read and write calls. It is a very capable, flexible and powerful language. One can solve a problem with a few lines of SQL code, that will take 100's of lines of PL/SQL or Java code.
So do not underestimate what can be done in SQL.
v_cmd := 'UPDATE parts_categ_counts SET w1='||v1||', w2='||v2||...||v9||' WHERE seq='||vseq||';
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE v_cmd;This code is also wrong. Besides the fact that there is no need for dynamic SQL, this approach creates a brand new SQL statement each loop iteration.
SQL is source code. It needs to be parsed (compiled). The end result is an executable program that is called a cursor. This cursor needs to be stored in server memory (the SQL Shared Pool in the SGA).
The problem with your code is that it is slow and expensive - it generates lots of unique SQL statements that need CPU for parsing and server memory for storage.
These add up to a very significant performance overhead. That is the wrong approach. The correct approach is the same one that you would use in any other programming language.
Let's say you need to use Java to process a bunch of CSV files - exact same CSV layout used by each file. A file needs to be read, processed, and a log file created.
Will you write a Java program that loops through the files, for each file found, write a Java program for processing that file, compile it, then execute it?
Or would you write a Java program that takes the name of the file as input, and then process that file and writes the log file?
The 2nd approach provides a program that can process any of those CSV files - one simply needs to pass the filename as an input parameter.
Your code and approach use the 1st method. Not the 2nd. And that is why it is wrong.
To create a SQL program with parameters is done by using bind variables. Instead of
v_cmd := 'UPDATE parts_categ_counts SET w1='||v1||', w2='||v2||...||v9||' WHERE seq='||vseq||';
The following SQL source code should be created:
v_cmd := 'UPDATE parts_categ_counts SET w1=:v1, w2=:v2 ..., w9=:v9 WHERE seq= :vseq';
The tokens with the colon prefix (such as :v1), are bind variables. Think of these as the parameters to the SQL cursor.
The server parses this SQL into a cursor. You can now execute the same cursor over and over again, using different bind variables. (just like the 2nd approach above that one would use in Java)
In PL/SQL, this is made even easier as you can code native SQL code with PL/SQL code and use PL/SQL variables in it. The PL/SQL compiler is clever enough to do the SQL parsing, variable binding, and cursor execution for you. So in PL/SQL, you would use:
UPDATE parts_categ_counts SET w1=v1, w2=v2 ..., w9=v9 WHERE seq= vseq;
Where v1 and the others are PL/SQL variables.
That all said - PL/SQL is only used for data crunching, when the processing of data is too complex for the SQL language to deal with. And this is very seldom the case.
The main reason for using PL/SQL it to provide processing flow control, conditional processing and error handling, for SQL code. As the SQL language does not have these features.

Error Updating table condition table 372 in J1IIN

Hello all,
I am facing the problem while working in ECC 6.0 environment in the transaction code J1IIN.
I have maintained the condition type JEXP ( A/R BED %) as 14% with the Key combination Country/Plant/Control Code (Table 357). While iam saving the Excise invoice the system is throwing the error like error updating the table condition table 372
I have gone through the post given by Ms. Jyoti few days back and tried to do some changes in the customisation.
I tried to maintain a different access sequence for the condition type JEXP i.e a new Access sequence(ZJEX) and also a new condition tpe (ZJEP). We don't have other Excise condition type in our Pricing procedure.
In the access sequence except condition table 372, I have maintained all other condition tables.
Still the error is persisiting. Can anyone put some light on the issue.
I have even traced the values being hit in the tables directly. There is no relation of table 372, then why is it being cause of the error.
Also while debugging it gives a message "An exception (CX_BADI_INITIAL_REFERENCE) occured".
Does this help in anyways.
Gurus plz give u r suggestions.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Karthik.

Hello Srinivas/Sandeep
Please ensure that access sequence in the condition type JEXC has got the table 372. If it is not there please maintain it.
The standard access sequence used in all duty condition type
is JEXC which has got the table 372 this will get updated once
you save your excise invoice.
If the issue is resolved, kinldy close the message.
Regards
MBS

Partner functions for FV11 conditions are not working for MIRO

Hi,
We have a business process wherein PO Ordering vendor and invoicing vendor are different.
We have defined FV11 tax conditions ( VAT and Excise)for PO vendor .
We have not defined FV11 tax conditions ( VAT and Excise) for Invoicing vendor.
So while we are doing MIRO for such PO, we are getting an error that VAT tax code say G1 is not maintained in TAXXINN proceedure.
When we defined TAX conditions for Invoicing vendor also , system allowed MIRO for such PO.
We are using TAXINN proceedure.
Guide me whether :
1. Definining VAT and Excise conditions for Invoicing vendor is a must ..?
OR
2. We can do some configuration in Partner functions sothat whatever Tax conditions defined for PO vendor will be defaulted and can be used sothat at the time of MIRO there will not any error for VAT and Excise conditions defined only in PO.
Thanks in advance !
Thanks & Regds,
Kasi.

Hi Kishore,
Thanks a lot for quick response .
As you said we have defined FV condition records were defined to key combination specific to Vendor. Given the scenario, can we change partner functions from PI or VN or other related , will System allow defualt these conditions to invoicing partner..? Iam not very much sure how partner functions work..? can please throw some light on this or guide me a link where can I get information on partner functions?
ALternatively , instead of defining FV11conditions for key combination with vendor, if we define FV 11 conditions for other combination such as at material group level- will it work?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks & Regds,
Kasi.

[svn:bz-trunk] 14330: BLZ-476 : Getting different error message in server' s servlet log and console log when class is not of expected type.

Revision: 14330
Revision: 14330
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-02-22 10:03:03 -0800 (Mon, 22 Feb 2010)
Log Message:
BLZ-476 : Getting different error message in server's servlet log and console log when class is not of expected type.
QA: no
Doc: no
checkin test : pass
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-476
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/MessageBrokerServlet.java

Hi, wbracken ,
As known, there are 2 different questions I raised.
Regarding the reply for the second one (Nothing to do with Chinese), I noticed there are several similar issues found in this forum, and it seems no response could solve my that problem. The related methods and classes were also well check, as well as the parameters put.
Any way, your reponse was appreciated.
Thank you for the help.

Different errors for similar conditions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for