Different form depending on Purchase Organisation

Hi,
does anyone knows the steps to print different forms in PO depending on purchase organisation?
Cheers

Hi,
Purchase order Forms can not be assigned at purchasing organisation level. We can assign Forms for Output Type.
You need to ask to your technical team to develop the forms.
Regards,
Manish

Similar Messages

Purchase Order - Default Company Code depending on Purchasing Org in Me21n

Hi Gurus,
I have requiremnet to default Company code to a value depending on Purchasing Organisation in Purchase Order Create/Change Transaction ME21n , ME22n.,( Also -ME31K, ME32K )
Purchasing Org and Company code can be seen in Me21n -> Header -> Org . Data Tab
Please let me know the user exit or Badi to do the same. If no what is the solution .
Regards
Avi

Hello AVI,
U can use the BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST.
In that there is one method Process_header.
From there u can do all the things that u need in the header part of the Purchase Order.
I think the Below User Exit can also be used :
MM06E004.
With Regards,
Sumodh.P

Questions regarding creation of vendor in different purchase organisation

Hi abap gurus .
i have few questions regarding data transfers .
1) while creating vendor , vendor is specific to company code and vendor can be present in different purchasing organisations within the same company code if the purchasing organisation is present at plant level .my client has vendor in different purchasing org. how the handle the above situatuion .
2) i had few error records while uploading MM01 , how to download error records , i was using lsmw with predefined programmes .
3) For few applications there are no predefined programmes , no i will have to chose either predefined BAPI or IDOCS . which is better to go with . i found that BAPI and IDOCS have same predefined structures , so what is the difference between both of them .

Hi,
1. Create a BDC program with Pur orgn as a Parameter on the selection screen
so run the same BDC program for different Put organisations so that the vendors
are created in different Pur orgns.
2. Check the Action Log in LSMW and see
3.see the doc
BAPI - BAPIs (Business Application Programming Interfaces) are the standard SAP interfaces. They play an important role in the technical integration and in the exchange of business data between SAP components, and between SAP and non-SAP components. BAPIs enable you to integrate these components and are therefore an important part of developing integration scenarios where multiple components are connected to each other, either on a local network or on the Internet.
BAPIs allow integration at the business level, not the technical level. This provides for greater stability of the linkage and independence from the underlying communication technology.
LSMW- No ABAP effort are required for the SAP data migration. However, effort are required to map the data into the structure according to the pre-determined format as specified by the pre-written ABAP upload program of the LSMW.
The Legacy System Migration Workbench (LSMW) is a tool recommended by SAP that you can use to transfer data once only or periodically from legacy systems into an R/3 System.
More and more medium-sized firms are implementing SAP solutions, and many of them have their legacy data in desktop programs. In this case, the data is exported in a format that can be read by PC spreadsheet systems. As a result, the data transfer is mere child's play: Simply enter the field names in the first line of the table, and the LSM Workbench's import routine automatically generates the input file for your conversion program.
The LSM Workbench lets you check the data for migration against the current settings of your customizing. The check is performed after the data migration, but before the update in your database.
So although it was designed for uploading of legacy data it is not restricted to this use.
We use it for mass changes, i.e. uploading new/replacement data and it is great, but there are limits on its functionality, depending on the complexity of the transaction you are trying to replicate.
The SAP transaction code is 'LSMW' for SAP version 4.6x.
Check your procedure using this Links.
BAPI with LSMW
http://esnips.com/doc/ef04c89f-f3a2-473c-beee-6db5bb3dbb0e/LSMW-with-BAPI
For document on using BAPI with LSMW, I suggest you to visit:
http://www.****************/Tutorials/LSMW/BAPIinLSMW/BL1.htm
http://esnips.com/doc/1cd73c19-4263-42a4-9d6f-ac5487b0ebcb/LSMW-with-Idocs.ppt
http://esnips.com/doc/ef04c89f-f3a2-473c-beee-6db5bb3dbb0e/LSMW-with-BAPI.ppt
<b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>
Regards
Anji

Is it possible to make a fillable form have variable fields - so if you select a radio button it triggers a different form field to be seen depending on which radio button is selected??

Is it possible to make a fillable form have variable fields - so if you select a radio button it triggers a different form field to be seen depending on which radio button is selected??

Yes, one needs to use some custom JavaScript code to control the other fields' properties.
Disabling (graying-out) Form Fields by Thom Parker

Vendor extended to different purchase organisations

dear all mm gurus,
pl update thru which t-code, one can see vendor extended to different purchase organisations.
pl help
regards
srihari

Hi Shri Hari,
You can try this in tcode MKVZ.
Mention the vendor number you want to check in the first tab.
Leave the purchasing organisation field and other tabs blank and execute.Then you will get the details for which purchasing organisations your vendor has been created.
Thanks,
Sampath

Forms - Submitting to different recipients depending on the selection

I have a form which I need to submit to different email
addresses depending on an option selected in one of the dropdown
boxes. This MUST be done on a client-side form.
Any ideas on how to go about this?
I want to avoid creating a different form for every scenario.
Thankyou

Of course, it completely fails if the computers have js
disabled. For an
environment where there is no access to server scripting, I'd
guess that
this is also a likely configuration.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"digitalus media" <[email protected]> wrote
in message
news:edqhi7$qnu$[email protected]..
> You can set the url or address of a hyperlink with
javascript.
>
> Try this:
>
>
> <html>
>
> <head>
> <script type="text/javascript">
> function myHref(email){
> document.getElementById('myLink').href='mailto:'+email;
> }
> </script>
> </head>
>
> <body>
>
> <p>Select a recipient</p>
>
> <form>
> <select name="select"
onchange="myHref(this.value);">
> <option
value='[email protected]'>Administrator</option>
> <option value='[email protected]'>Bill</option>
> </select>
> </form>
>
> <p><a id="myLink"
href="mailto:[email protected]">send message</a></p>
>
> </body>
>
> </html>
>

Purchasing organisation

What is the difference between Reference Purchasing organisation and Central Purchasing organisation.

Vishal
See these examples
<b>Reference Purchasing Organisation</b>
A purchasing organization whose conditions or contracts other purchasing organizations linked to it may access and use.
A reference purchasing organization can make especially favorable conditions or contracts available to other purchasing organizations.
<b>Example</b>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/0b/ecb237e29bc368e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
<b>Central Purchasing Organisation</b>
Centralized/Distributed Purchasing
You can organize your purchasing function in the following ways:
Centralized purchasing, with just one purchasing organization
Distributed purchasing, with a number of different purchasing organizations each responsible for different plants
You could also look this configuration on How to maintain Purchase Organisation
Maintain purchasing organization
In this step, you set up your purchasing organizations.
From the Materials Management and Purchasing view, the purchasing organization is responsible for all purchasing activities (including the processing of requests for quotations and purchase orders, for example).
The purchasing organization is integrated within the organizational structure as follows:
A purchasing organization can be assigned to several company codes.
(= Corporate-group-wide purchasing).
A purchasing organization can be assigned to one company code.
(= Company-specific purchasing).
A purchasing organization can also exist without being assigned to a company code.
Since each plant must be assigned to a company code, the latter can be determined via the plant at the time of each procurement transaction even if the procuring purchasing organization has not been assigned to a company code.
A purchasing organization must be assigned to one or more plants.
(= Plant-specific purchasing).
A purchasing organization can be linked to one or more other purchasing organizations.
(= reference purchasing organization)
For more on this topic, refer to Assign Purchasing Organization to Reference Purchasing Organization.
A purchasing organization can be divided into several purchasing groups that are responsible for different operational areas.
Each purchasing organization has its own info records and conditions for pricing.
Each purchasing organization has its own vendor master data.
Each purchasing organization evaluates its own vendors using MM Vendor Evaluation.
Authorizations for processing purchasing transactions can be assigned to each purchasing organization.
All items of an external purchasing document, that is, request for quotation, purchase order, contract, or scheduling agreement, belong to a purchasing organization.
The purchasing organization is the highest level of aggregation (after the organizational unit "client") for purchasing statistics.
The purchasing organization serves as the selection criterion for lists of all purchasing documents.
Possible organizational forms
You can organize your purchasing function in the following ways:
Corporate-group-wide purchasing
Company-specific purchasing
Plant-specific purchasing
All of these forms can co-exist within a single client.
Corporate-group-wide purchasing:
A purchasing organization is responsible for the purchasing activities of different company codes.
In this case, you do not assign a company code to the purchasing organization, but specify the company code concerned for each individual purchasing transaction. You assign plants from different company codes to the purchasing organization.
Company-specific purchasing:
A purchasing organization is responsible for the purchasing activities of just one company code.
In this case, you assign a company code to the purchasing organization. The purchasing organization may procure only for this company code. You assign only plants of the company code concerned to the purchasing organization.
Plant-specific purchasing:
A purchasing organization is responsible for the purchasing activities of one plant.
In this case, you assign the plant and the company code of the plant to the purchasing organization. The purchasing organization may procure for this plant only.
Note
If you wish to work with a mixture of the above organizational forms, the reference purchasing organization is of significance to you.
It is possible to allow one purchasing organization to access the contracts and conditions of another - a so-called reference purchasing organization. This makes it possible for advantageous terms negotiated by one purchasing organization to also be used by other purchasing organizations.
Recommendation
Purchasing organization 0001 is already preset in all dependent tables.
SAP recommends that you retain this number if you require only one purchasing organization.
You will then have to customize only a few tables.
Hope this helps
Thnaks
Sat

Aperture performs adjustments in a different order depending on file type

Aperture performs Adjustments in a different order depending on file type.
Here's an example:
Starting with two copies of an image, one in RAW format (Canon CRW from a D60), the other in TIFF (opened the .crw file in Preview and exported an 8bit tiff file).
{The test image is a photo of my copy of Aperture on the floor of my studio (which, for reference, is a few points of Cyan off of a neutral grey).}
The original Image.
http://members.arstechnica.com/x/adrien/testRAW_originalImage.jpg
Adjustments
http://members.arstechnica.com/x/adrien/adjustments.jpg
The RAW file adjusted
http://members.arstechnica.com/x/adrien/testRAW_adjusted.jpg
The TIFF files adjusted
http://members.arstechnica.com/x/adrien/testTIFF_adjusted.jpg
Import both of these files (testRAW.crw & testTIFF.tiff) into Aperture.
Make adjustments to the RAW and TIFF images:
- Exposure: Saturation -> 0 (lowest possible value).
- White Balance: Temp -> 3500K (from 5000K).
It doesn't matter what order you perform these operations in.
The RAW file is now a neutral greyscale image. With the Saturation set to 0, the White Balance makes no major difference in the image, it stays grey.
The TIFF file, however, is now a blue tinted greyscale image - much like a sepia-tone effect. Moving the White Balance slider changes the color of the image.
It appears that Aperture is performing the Saturation and WB operations in a different order: for the RAW file it first performs the WB, then the saturation; while in the TIFF file it performs the saturation first, then the WB.
The result is the same for a JPEG image.
The RAW behavior is the 'expected' behavior in photography - White Balance should happen 'before' the Saturation setting.
I've filed the bug with Apple (number 4394125 at bugreport.apple.com). hopefully they'll fix this.
Cross posted from this discussion at the MacAch on ArsTechnica forums:
http://episteme.arstechnica.com/groupee/forums/a/tpc/f/8300945231/m/893007866731 /r/832001796731#832001796731

Well, there are different ways of achieving this.
Solution 1:
You can create a new output type which will be triggered and call a same driver program and the new smart form. I am sure you can customize as to what Purchasing document type will trigger which output type. Get in touch with someone in the function team to get this configured.
Solution 2:
No Customizing, let the configuration be the same, but in the driver program change the value of "TNAPR-FONAM" immediately after the form entry_neu to the new form name based on the Purchasing document type.

Two purchasing organisations for one user

Hi Experts,
We are running SRM 4.0, extended classic scenario with a large international setup.
I have an issue with purchaser that need to be able to shop for two different pur. orgs. in two different company codes (A & B).
I have added both A & B in the Company Code attribute for the user.
And I have made both the local purchasing groups for A & B responsible for the purchaser.
When I create a SC I can select whether to use Company code A & B and I can select the matching Purchasing Group. When I finish the shopping cart the order is created in SRM with correct the Local Purchasing Organisation which the Pur. Group I chose belongs to.
But when it is tranfered to R/3 it is allways assigning pur. org. A. (also if the order in SRM has local pur. org. B). This results in a error, if the purchase wants to make a purchase for Company B.
Is it not possible in SRM to able to chose more than one backend pur. org.?

Hej igen, Anders.
I don't suppose you have found a solution here?
What I was thinking is, that you should try using the GUID of the purchase order from SRM and use it in the function module BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC_V2 to test which data are getting sent from SRM to R/3. You know you can find the GUID of the PO from transaction BBP_PD with BUS2201, and this GUID is the only thing needed to test the function module. This FM is sending your shopping cart/PO data from SRM to R/3, so if you can debug this to see that here the p org is correct, you would know that the error occurs in R/3.
On the other hand you could also see in BBP_PD for the purchase order in SRM if the p org is already wrong here?
Cross buying is possible, so hopefully you get to find your error. Otherwise post a reply here, we'll figure something else out.
BR
Dennis

Purchase organisation Field in Vendor master data

Hi All
During the creation of Vendor master ,Needs to make the Field Purchase organisation as a mandatory. I have checked the in the following configs.
Define Account Groups with Screen Layout (Vendors
Define Screen Layout per Company Code (Vendors)
Define Account Group and Field Selection (Vendor)
The option is not available. for the above requirement.
thanks & Regards
DP

In many companies the address data is maintained by different people than accounting data and purchasing org data.
I would not like that accountants to create my purchasing org data, and I am certain that my accountants dont want the buyer to create his accounting data.
if you could make this combination mandatory, then the user would have to maintain all screens at the same time, which may result in delays. as he can only start once he has all data available. SAP standard allows to create a vendor with general data and purchasing org data and purchasing can start buying. the company code data is only needed in the moment the goods arrive.
So you gain time to collect the data while you already started business.
Further, not all vendor master need to have purchasing org data. and not all vendors with purchasing org views need a company code view.
e.g. a restraunt may send you bills for lunch, but you do not place purchase orders with this restaurant. No purchasing org view needed here.
a goods supplier, that is needed for Intrastat purposes only, does not need a company code view, as you will never get invoices from the goods supplier.

Set a different form for a different e-commerce product?

Hi,
I'm new to Business Catalyst, so sorry if this is an obvious question
My client wants to set up registration for a conference on their website. This would be set up as if it was a product on the site (using PayPal standard). The site currently is used for customers to purchase a physical product, and so once they have added it to the cart they are taken to a registration form which asks for their shipping and billing addresses, etc.
This is the same form that customers would currently be directed to after adding the conference registration to their cart. The thing is, my client would like to be able to ask different questions for those registering for the conference- such as dietry needs, etc, which would ideally not be asked when a customer was purchasing a physical product, rather than conference registration.
So my question is, is it possible to redirect users to a different web form, dpending on which product they buy?
Currently the only two solutions I see are first setting up a web form with the questions about dietry requirements, etc, and then redirecting them to the conference 'registration' product (but this would make it more complicated for the user), or else purchasing a seamless gateway such as PayPal Pro, and setting up the conference as different web form
Is there a way to still set up the conference registration as a product, but ask the customer different questions/ have a different form?
Thanks
Sam

I'm pretty sure that there's no way you can change just the Game Center password, but once iOS 8 comes out, you may be able to add him to the Family Sharing App that they're rolling out with iOS 8 and he'll be able to enjoy the game, but it'll prompt you if he goes to buy an in-app purchase. They haven't released a date for iOS 8 but besides the "Coming this Fall" date. That is the only thing i can think of. I put the link at the bottom of my post for the Family Sharing App for iOS 8.
Hope it helps,
broken
https://www.apple.com/ios/ios8/family-sharing/

To find purchasing organisation for material

Hi Experts,
Sounds quite a trivial query but i really could not find the way out to link material with purchasing organisation.
Please note that we do not want to use Puchasing Info record tables. This is so because requirement itself says automating the PIR creation process through ME11. and for that we need to filter out materials which have a specified Purchasing Organisation.
Now you may ask a question as to how Purchasing org is maintained on the very first place. This has been created via provision in ISR webform for creating material.
I hope i have made my query clear enough. Seeking your expert advise on the same.
Thanks,
Shreya

Hi,
I think you can not find Purchase organization for a material as one maerial may come from multiple purchase organizations
(However it depends on the Buisness process) but you can find purchase ogranization with material and plant combination.
Regards
Bikas

Dynamic link to different form and parameters

Have a few problems i would like some help on.
First i will describe what I’m planning to do.
And I'm sorry if it's a little of the normal way of doing it, but I'm new to the Portal
Have a list over different trip people shall have possibility to join,
Some of those trips can are for the person only and others for the whole family.
So my plan is to show a list of all the trips and then a status saying if
they already has join it or not.
Then the person can press the trip (link) and depending on some data,
they would be transferred to 2 different forms. One for 1 person trip and another for a x person trip.
Like:
Trip     | Status | Personal/family
Golf     | New     | Personal - if pressed open form1
Boat     | New     | Personal - if pressed open form1
Dinner     | New      | Family - if pressed open form2
Soccer     | Accepted |Personal - if pressed open form1
Tennis | Declined | Personal - if pressed open form1
I made a report, showing all trip, but i can only make it use 1 link to form1, how do i make the link dynamic
The next problem is when i open form1, i would like to do some stuff in PL/SQL (Before Page).
But I have tried to get the parameters from the URL and I cannot get it to work.
I use something like, but the l_names.count is 0
....portal/PORTAL.wwa_app_module.link?p_arg_names=_moduleid&p_arg_values=1380125721&p_arg_names=_sessionid&p_arg_values=&p_arg_names=ENROLL_ID&p_arg_values=5677&p_arg_names=_enroll_id_cond&p_arg_values=%3D
DECLARE
l_names owa.vc_arr;
l_values owa.vc_arr;
l_lang varchar2(100) := PORTAL.wwctx_api.get_nls_language;
l_enroll_id NUMBER;
BEGIN
PORTAL.wwpro_api_parameters.retrieve(l_names, l_values);
FOR i in 1..l_names.count
LOOP
IF l_names(i) = 'enroll_id' THEN
     l_enroll_id:= l_values(i);
END IF;
END LOOP;
END;
What i also want to do is in some cases. Is create a row in a table and populate the form1 with it in the "before page", instead of using query from parameters.
Like:
Trip     | Status | Personal/family
Golf     | New     | Personal - if pressed open form1 and insert data and populate the form with the inserted data
Soccer     | Accepted |Personal - if pressed open form1 and do the standard query
How do I do that?

One way to do this would be to hold the urls for the pages you need to display in a table. You could then build the links as one of the columns of a report using some fancy SQL.<br>
<br>
Or you could make a simple function to return the correct link based on the relevant parameters:<br>
<br>
create or replace function get_url (p_criteria in varchar2) return varchar2<br>
is<br>
lv_url varchar2(500);<br>
begin<br>
if p_criteria = 'Personal' then<br>
lv_url := 'http://host:port/pls/portal/etc...';<br>
end if;<br>
etc...<br>
return '&LT;a href="' || lv_url || '"&GT;' || p_criteria || '&LT;/a&GT;';<br>
end;<br>
<br>
Your report could then include the function as one of the columns in your report.<br>
Not very elegant but it should do the job.
Patrick.

User assignment to purchasing organisation and purchasing groups

Dear Experts,
My issue is related to user assignment to purchasing organisation and purchasing groups.
According to the project requirement, we are using central purchasing organisation and we should create the purchasing organisations and purchasing groups locally. it is not reflected from the back end systems through RFC.
Also we have one more team working with indirect materials and they also use SRM. They have already created the organisation model. Two projects are inter-related and belongs to same department in the company, but main different is one uses direct and the other in-direct materials.
Now we should create our purchasing organisation and purchasing groups and assign the users to it.
If we create it separately means not uder the main root and assign the users, we are able to create shopping cart till the contract. But when i create the new purchasing organisation and purchasing groups under the main root which is created for other project which deals with in-direct materails, i am not able to create shopping cart with the user. I am getting the error
' Process scheme could not be found
Please let me know how to deal with this scenario. here i need to add the purchasing organisation and purchasing groups under main root because of the reason that in the other project, purchasing organisation and purchasing groups defined needs to be accessed by our users as well. I mean the users should be able to access all the purchasing organisation and purchasing groups created under root node which gets the purchasing organisation and purchasing groups from the back end systems and the purchasing organisation and purchasing groups we created manually since we cant get it from back end system since it is central purchasing organisation.
Please asvise
Best regards,
Srinath
Edited by: srinath_Vijaya on May 27, 2010 4:21 PM

Hello Masa,
Thanks very much for your time and solution.
Actually the problem was something else and was fixed.
The reason for getting error 'Process schema was not yet defined' is because of missing definition of process schedma for the workflow since the process based workflow setting has been activated.
So this has been resolved by copying the sap standard customizing BC set for SRM workflow using transaction SAPR20 and then process schema for workflow got configured or copied automatically from SAP BC set and the error was removed.
Also the reason for error with user was that no purchaser assignment was done to the purchasing organisation and now it has been done and the users can access the SRM and create shopping cart and the contract.
Regards,
Srinath

One Purchase group assignment to Mutiple Purchase Organisation in SRM 5.5

Hi
We have business requirement that one purchase group caters two purchase organisation in SRM 5.0
Is it possible ? How?
Regards,
NNK

Hi Nitin,
You can not assign same purchasing group for two different purchasing orgnisations in SRM. if you try to do then you will get below message.
"Purchasing group 101 in system QASCLNT500 already assigned to New organizational unit
Thanks
Ravi

Different form depending on Purchase Organisation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for