Direct posting to GL A/C through MIRO and Tax Defaults

Hi,
We have this default AP code for MIRO, done using OMR2.
But when I go to the G/L tab and give the GL account for postings it gives a red error and ask for Tax Jurisdiction code, why is this not getting defaulted as per the PO? I have to either manually remove the defaulting tax code or have to punch in the Tax jurisdiction code. Any help in simplifying and defaulting the tax jurisdiction will be a great help.
thanks
Rose

Thanks for the input. The message is F5566 and its a valid error. My question is how to get the tax jurisdiction defaulted to avoid getting this error. Since we donot use the input tax. Also, I will add that we are in US and use Vertex.

Similar Messages

  • Direct Posting to G/L Account in MIRO

    Hi,
    I have created a Purchase Order with following conditions
    Qty     50
    Price     100
    Total (Accessible Value for Excise)     5000
    Excise     500
    Ecess     10
    HSCess     5
    Total Excise     515
    Total+Excise For VAT     5515
    VAT     744.525
    Total Payable to Vendor     6259.525
    Here please note that the Excise is being calculated on Rs. 5000.
    When we receive the Excise Invoice, the Vendor is charging the Excise on different Accessable Value i.e. on Rs. 16000
    While posting the Excise Invoice, I have changed the Accessible Value and the following FI document is generated:
    24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     6
    24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     600
    24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     12
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     618.00-
    While posting the Vendor Invoice, the system is showing a difference in Ecess, SHEcess & VAT Amount as shown below:
    K     13000000     PK Industries PVT LTD      6,359.53-
    S     13110100     GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom     5,000.00
    S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     600
    S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     10
    S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     5
    S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     744.53
    To match the difference we posted the difference in VAT & Cenvat the G/L Account tab and Rs, 135.01- in Unpl. Del. Csts
    The system is generating the following FI Entries
    K     13000000     PK Industries PVT LTD      6,376.43-                    **
    S     13110100     GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom     5,000.00     4500000841     EE
    M     24340000     SinarMatArtCard>220gsm63.5x91"     131.03-     4500000841     EE
    S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     1.95                    V0
    S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     0.97                    V0
    S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     145.01                     
    S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     600                    EE
    S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     10                    EE
    S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     5                    EE
    S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     744.53                    EE
    My question/ doubt is:
    1.     Is this the correct way to pass the difference in VAT & Excise directly to G/L Accounts?
    2.     Why in MIRO, the BED is correct & ECess & HSCess are wrong? Is this related with Tax Procedure & Pricing Procedure?
    3.     What is the standard way for handling the above situation. Please note that this situation is coming for only one Excise Vendor.
    Please advise.
    Regards,

    1.In J1IEX, we could not found MRP Indicator check box in miscellaneous tab.
    Where do we need to change in the Configuration.
    Refer this thread [MRP indicator|Re: MRP indicator]
    2.While posting the MIRO, the following entries were generated, which is wrong?
    Here tax amount being calculate is wrong;
    it should be 240 as per the manual. On simulation, the ECess amount is not shown.
    As suggested in earlier reply,Please check tax procedure with help of FI consultant.
    3.When capturing the Invoice in MIGO, MRP Indicator check box was there in Miscellaneous tab.
    But the HSCess was not in editable mode, we could just enter the Basic Duty & ECess Amount.
    There are lot of threads regarding hecess not editable,Pl search.
    If possible can you please provide the details of the process from PO to MIRO
    along with FI Entries so that I can test the same again (to get a clear cut concept of the process).
    1.Purchase order with price + excise values with dealer tax code.
    2. GR with excise (capture & post) or
    A.Capture excise with ref. to p.o using J1IEX,tick mark mrp indicator,change excise base value,enter other excise amounts.
    B. GR with ref. to ex. inv. no(In step A) - Refer exise invoice only
    C. Post excise with ref. to ex. inv. no.
    3. Vendor invoice ref. to delivery note no.
    FI entries for GR
    Stock account Dr to GR/IR a/c
    Excise entries
    Cenvat payable ED,CS,HECS Dr to Cenvat clearing a/c
    Vendor invoice entries
    GR/IR A/c,Cenvat clearing a/c,VAT/CST a/c  Dr to Vendor a/c
    Hope it solves problem.
    Note :
    I will suggest you to search forum before posting basic questions.
    Don;t post multiple questions.
    Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 4, 2010 3:05 PM

  • MIRO - Activate Direct posting to G/L Account - user exit/badi

    Hello,
    I would like to know if it is possible to restrict the acces to the direct posting to GL account tab in MIRO.
    Activation of the flag in config leads to the appearance of this tabpage in all MIRO transactions.
    My cliente needs this tab page to appear in only a certain set of circumstances.
    Is there a user-exit or BADI to manipulate the "Direct-posting Tab" in this way?
    Anyone has done something like that?
    Thanks for any reply.
    Aart

    By creating transaction variant & restricting g/l account tab through authorization for required users.

  • How to add line items to Accounting Document posted through MIRO ?

    I need to perform Additional posting when Posting through MIRO transaction..i tried with INVOICE_UPDATE BADI but this was not useful...Please let me know if there is any way to add additional posting to Accounting Document created through MIRO.
    If any user exit , BADI ot BTE present?

    Hi,
    Check the BTE's:
    00001020     POST DOCUMENT:       Prior to final checks             SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001020
    00001025     POST DOCUMENT:       Final checks completed       SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001025
    00001030     POST DOCUMENT:       Posting of standard data     SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001030
    00001050     POST DOCUMENT:       Accounting interface           SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001050
    Thanks & Regards,
    Harish

  • How do I transfer files from one third party app to another through wifi and without a computer

    How do I transfer files from one third party app directly to another third party app through wifi and without a computer?

    Wifi network
    Email
    Thumb Drive
    Online storage such as, iCloud Google Docs, SkyDrive, etc.

  • BTE while posting accounting document through MIRO

    Hi All,
    I am doing MIRO posting with PO,while MIRO posting accounting document is getting created for it.  I need a BTE while posting accounting document through MIRO to trigger workflow(through event).
    For direct accounting document posting I found the BTE 1030 to trigger workflow.
    Thanks
    Sree

    Hello !
          The BTE required is "00001120     DOCUMENT POSTING:  Field substitution header/items".
          Double click on this entry at FIBF transaction and you will find the function module SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120
          Take a copy of this function module and go ahead.It is not possible to change the tables T_BKPF and T_BSEG. So, use the tables T_BKPFSUB and T_BSEGSUB.
    Regards,
    S.Suresh

  • System Calculating HCess twise while posting MM Invoice through MIRO

    Dear Gurus,
    System calcuating Highter Cess twise while posting MM invoice through MIRO.
    Please guide where could be problem... Pls provide standard steps need to verfy one by one to analysis the same.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Dear Santosh,
    We are using TAXINN-Condition based method. We are maintaing JSEP as HCESs condition and JHX1 as Off-setting conditiong type.
    But system calcuating condition value against both in IV........
    Regards,
    Venkat

  • Issue while posting through MIRO

    Hi,
    I am posting through MIRO.
    I am using two POs in MIRO from different contracts.
    When I add them for one PO amount and QTY feild is filled up properly,
    but for other the value of QYT is filled into amount and qty field.
    Could any one help in solving this issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    You ae trying to post two POs from different contracts (i assume for same vednor)
    When you allocate the first PO, everythin is fine
    when you subsequently allocate the second PO, the vale and qty fields are not populated properly.
    Is this right?
    What values are going to the qty and value fields of second PO?

  • MIRO - deactivate direct posting to GL / material acct for selected company codes

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement to deactive direct posting to G/L and material accounts in MIRO, however, only for selected company codes (this cannot be done for all of them on client level in SPRO->Material Management->Logistic Invoice verification->Incoming Invoice -> Activate direct posting to GL/ Material accounts).
    The thing is that for those company codes, MIRO posting has to be made always with Purchase Order Reference.
    My idea is to build simple validation rule:
    if company code is equal to (SET) and Purchase Order Reference is empty then error message should appear: "Posting without PO reference not allowed"
    I was also thinking on creating own layout in MIRO and assign it to clerks which are responsible for posting in those company codes.
    Can you advise on that, please?
    Best regards,
    Lukasz

    Hi Tejas,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Answering your questions:
    1. The thing is that these GLs are being posted with other transactions.
    2. My concern is that after the document is parked and while editing user will delete PO reference, it can be any GL account picked in "GL tab" of MIRO transaction. My understanding is that I should put tick on "Post automatically only" on all the GL accounts which users are able to use (correctly or not) in that case.
    My aim in this configuration is to restrict those posting in such way that users are not allowed to use them - and this is only in regards to MIRO transaction.

  • My user doing the direct posting in MIRO without useing the PO

    Hello Exports
    My user doing the direct posting in MIRO without using the PO.
    but after posting in MIRO, its picking up the R ( invoice Verification ) in Payment block field. and also i ve check in Vendor master there is no "R" Falg in Payment block field.
    Can  any body give me suggestion on the same
    Thanks and Regards
    sudharshana vamsi

    Thanks for all
    The probelm was solved
    Regards
    vamsi

  • Invoices posted through MIRO

    Hello All
    Does anyone know which table the documents posted through MIRO are held in?. I am particulery interested in the payment block flag. I have an invoice where it differs from the finance document
    I have already check tables BSIK and BSAK
    Thanks
    Prakash

    Hi Prakash,
    The Accounting document of the invoice created thru MIRO will be saved in BKPF and BSEG.
    AS

  • Workflow not starting for invoice posting through MIRO...

    Hi,
    I have a blocked invoice workflow in Release status. The business object BUS2081 is used and POSTED event is activated in the workflow.
    Hello Gurus,
    Now when I try to post invoice through MIRO, the workflow does not start. I go to top called service for object icon and click on Workflow, but I cannot see the workflow started.
    Please help.
    Regards,
    Rajesh.

    Hi
    This was already discussed. Check in SWEL Tcode whether the Posted Event is getting triggered or not. If not then find out whether this event gets triggered automatically or through Coding. If thru coding check ur code. If thru config check ur config.
    Please close thread when this gets resolved

  • Help with posting a vendor invoice through MIRO.

    Hi,
    We are having an issue with posting an invoice through MIRO where the purchase order has large number of lines cause it to exceed the 999 limit of SAP for the accounting document. While we are researching as to how to address this. I need help on how to get the invoice in and  pay the vendor in the interim.
    There are 171 PO lines, the max I believe that can be handled is 165 with out giving grief to the system.
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Chandra Muppavarapu on Sep 20, 2011 12:10 PM

    Please check the below link, may be useful
    more than 999 line items for an invoice

  • Asset posting Through MIRO

    hai
    while posting asset through MIRO , i am  getting problem like
    mean amount 5892.56 inr exceeds low value asset maximum amount".
    can any body tell me ,how can i solue this.
    use points points will be assain.
    thanks
    ram

    chek wht is the maximum amount given for low value asset... i.e is 5000 if u try to post more amount it wont allow u....so just change the amount in maximum amount  or select another asset
    U can do the check the amount entered for low value asste and for any change go to
    spro-- financial accounting-- asset accountingvaluationamout specifications--specify max. amount for low value asset
    or t.code OAYK
    system will allow you..
    thanks
    sejal

  • MIRO: Activate Direct Posting to G/LAccounts and Material Accounts

    Hi,
    To which table does the following customising write to:
    IMG/Materials Management/Logistics Invoice Verification/| Incoming Invoice/Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts
    Thanks
    -S-

    TCULIV
    Regards.

Maybe you are looking for