MIRO - deactivate direct posting to GL / material acct for selected company codes

Hi All,
I have a requirement to deactive direct posting to G/L and material accounts in MIRO, however, only for selected company codes (this cannot be done for all of them on client level in SPRO->Material Management->Logistic Invoice verification->Incoming Invoice -> Activate direct posting to GL/ Material accounts).
The thing is that for those company codes, MIRO posting has to be made always with Purchase Order Reference.
My idea is to build simple validation rule:
if company code is equal to (SET) and Purchase Order Reference is empty then error message should appear: "Posting without PO reference not allowed"
I was also thinking on creating own layout in MIRO and assign it to clerks which are responsible for posting in those company codes.
Can you advise on that, please?
Best regards,
Lukasz

Hi Tejas,
Thanks for your reply.
Answering your questions:
1. The thing is that these GLs are being posted with other transactions.
2. My concern is that after the document is parked and while editing user will delete PO reference, it can be any GL account picked in "GL tab" of MIRO transaction. My understanding is that I should put tick on "Post automatically only" on all the GL accounts which users are able to use (correctly or not) in that case.
My aim in this configuration is to restrict those posting in such way that users are not allowed to use them - and this is only in regards to MIRO transaction.

Similar Messages

  • User exit for different Material Document for different company code

    Hi,
    We want to have different no. range for Material document (GR) for different compnay code. Presently we have no. range at client level. Can we do with any userexit. If so pls. give the details.
    Regards
    Sai Krishna

    [user exit for generating external serial;
    [BADI MB_DOCUMENT_BADI;
    [user exit or any other enhancements during good receipt;

  • Post an InterCo parked document for another Company Code

    There are two (2) users with authorizations only to their company codes (CC):
    User1 can create/save/delete park/post a doc in CC1.
    User2 can create/save/delete park/post a doc in CC2.
    User1 can create and park an InterCo doc in CC1/CC2.
    User2 can create and park an InterCo doc in CC2/CC1.
    <Q1> How can I restrict User1 to post ONLY the parked InterCo doc, but not post any other doc in CC2?
    <Q2> How can I restrict User2 to post ONLY the parked InterCo doc, but not post any other doc in CC1?
    I have looked into the Auth. Object F_BKPF_BUK, but it doesn't cover me!!!

    Hi Kedar, thanks for your reply, again!
    That won't work. here is the scenario:
    1) UserCC1 will park an InterCo doc with 2 lines (credit to CC1, debit to CC2)
    2) UserCC2 should go ahead and post this newly park document
    3) UserCC2 should be able to post ONLY the InterCo park documents associate with his/her CC.
    4) UserCC2 should NOT be able to post any other doc on any other CC.
    Is it clear what the goal is?
    I have concluded that in oder to control it, I need an Auth. Object for CC (which I have already) and another Auth. Object that conttols 'Docyment Type'.
    Do you know what Auth. Object controls 'Doc.Type'?
    Best regards,
    Tom

  • F-02 Docment posted for cross company code TAX

    Dear Experts ,
    Can you please explain me ,
    when i posted docment in F-02 for cross company code postings that is Dr for 1150 company code and credit for 5500 company code ,
    1] i need to enter tax  code is YY is same to both company codes 1150 & 5500
    ] i need to enter  tax jurisdiction code for company code 1150 is 1254693  and company code 5500 is 4525658
    when i enter these two Tax jurisdiction code system shows error when i saved error message # FF 744
    ERROR MESSAGE  BELOW
    [  The jurisdiction codes entered on the individual line items have different controls for determinating the cash discount base amount (upper level  and ).
    This is not allowed within a document.
    Procedure
    Please correct the entered jurisdiction code (if not correct) or if need be, post the transaction to two single documents.
    Can you please help me how i enter postings in F-02
    Regards
    Bhaskar

    Thanks

  • Passing validation(ob28) for particular company code at the time of posting

    Hi Gurus,
    My business requirement is creation of new company code for recalculation of accrual amount. where in these recalculated amount will be posted to new company code, however we had defined some validation (ob28) for document posting. so my query related to is it possible to pass all the validations for this new company code  at the time of posting?
    your response will be highly appreciated
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jamuna

    Hi,
    My requirement is to create new company code, and whenever the document will be posted during the posting whatever validations has been defined with respective to document posting should be restrict for new company code.
    so wheneever business will try to post the document for new company code all the existing validations will be by pass for document posting.
    Thanks,
    Jamuna

  • No valid task list for material ""  plant "" for selection criteria

    I am getting the following error while creating a production order:
    No valid task list for material ""  plant "" for selection criteria
    Does anyone know how to fix this?
    thanks,
    Scott

    Dear,
    1. Check in Order type dependent parameter - OPL8, select your Plant & Order type. In this check the task list, it should be N. then selection priority in OPJF settings
    2. Chek the routing valid from date for this material by CA02. The production order start date must be between valid date.
    3)Kindly check the routing header.Whether it is for usage 1 and Release status '4'
    4) Task list we maintain in OP8B please check and come back.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar
    Edited by: R Brahmankar on Nov 19, 2008 9:57 AM

  • Posting Error when Employee Transferred from 1 Company Code to another

    Dear All,
    I am working on 2 company codes and I am facing a problem in Payroll posting to finance when employees of 1 company code are transferred to the other company code if there is Retro Accounting for the employee.
    For Eg. 1 employee is transferred from Company Code 1000 to Company Code 2000 in the month of September. But the employee has taken 3 days of unpaid leave in August and the same was not updated in the system in August before the payroll of August. So in september when the payroll is processed, retro accouting happens and the amount for 3 days is deducted in september.
    But when I am making a posting to finance it is giving me Error in posting as "Posting balance is not cleared (Period 08 / 2011 P)".
    I have activated the PPMOD Feature and have done all the necessary configurations.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Vijay

    Dear Vijay...
    Basically its better to rehire the employee in other company code rather than to transfer from one company code to another. because every company code has its own financial structure and error is cuming due to this.
    Now u have to check few things...
    1. Ask the Costing (CO) team to open the entries in last period 08/2011 and then check the posting.
    2. If error will not resolve then check the wagetype permisibility for Personnel Areas and Employee Groups.
    3. If error is still there, then ask the finanacial team to change the profit centers of those cost center which are related to that particular employees.
    I hope ur issue will be resolved within these three solutions.
    Regards,

  • MIRO: Activate Direct Posting to G/LAccounts and Material Accounts

    Hi,
    To which table does the following customising write to:
    IMG/Materials Management/Logistics Invoice Verification/| Incoming Invoice/Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts
    Thanks
    -S-

    TCULIV
    Regards.

  • MIRO - Activate Direct posting to G/L Account - user exit/badi

    Hello,
    I would like to know if it is possible to restrict the acces to the direct posting to GL account tab in MIRO.
    Activation of the flag in config leads to the appearance of this tabpage in all MIRO transactions.
    My cliente needs this tab page to appear in only a certain set of circumstances.
    Is there a user-exit or BADI to manipulate the "Direct-posting Tab" in this way?
    Anyone has done something like that?
    Thanks for any reply.
    Aart

    By creating transaction variant & restricting g/l account tab through authorization for required users.

  • Not able to post to asset for the company code 5101 in fiscal year 2011

    Hi,
    I have created a Purchase Requisition(PR) for Account Assignement Cat as A in ME51n. And assigned an Asset number.
    In ME57, with ref to the PR created, I created a PO.
    While trying to do goods receipt for the PO at MIGO_GR,am able to generate the Mat Doc number but there are no subsequent Accoutning Documents available.
    Similarly while performing invoice handling Tcode - MIRO, am getting error message as "You cannot post to asset in company code 5101 fiscal year 2011
    In PO, under Account Assignment Tab,Distribution is: Single Account Assignment and Under Delivery, GR Non Valuated is unticked.
    Your help will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Nirmala

    Hi Nirmala
    There are 2 issues
    1. OME9: Account Assignment Category A - You hve ticked GR Non Valuated there
    Hence, accounting doc is not generated @ MIGO.. It is generated at MIRO....
    If you want accounting doc at MIGO, then untick the same in OME9... Also, you would need to untick the same in PO, if available for modification....If not available, then delete the Line item and create a new one
    2. It seems you have not opened FY 2011 for assets...
    Do AJAB to close 2010 and AJRW which would open 2011... You can open 2011 w/o closing 2010, provided 2009 is closed...
    Br, Ajay M

  • Transfer Posting between plant to plant under 2 company codes

    Hello all,
    I have 2 company codes 9002 and 2850.
    Under 9002 there is a plant 9002 with storage location WHSE.
    Under 2850 there is a plant 3105 with storage location WHSE.
    Whenever I am moving a material from plant 3105 to 9002, I am getting the following error in the system:
    No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 9002 and 2850.
    The system clearly requires a configuration to solve this error. But my doubt is, is there any other way by which I can solve this error without making any new configuration??? My client does not need any configuration but wants this error to be resolved. Is there any way???
    Kindly advise.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Umakanth.

    This is absolutely a SAP standard error which can be easily solved by FI guys.
    Though I dont remember the transaction code now but it becomes necessary to maintain clearing accounts between two company codes for accounting consistency.
    Please convince your client and get it done from FI guys. You will have to show your consulting skills here.

  • How to change posting period for a company code

    Hi Gurus,
    In MIGO while doing goods receipt i get this error " Posting only possible in periods 2006/05 and 2006/04 in company code 3000"
    How to change the posting period.
    I have serched in SDN, i tried transaction MMPV, and OB52 but i am not able to change as i dont know the basics of the screen as i am ABAPER.
    Can u tell me how to change. or give sme link with some snapshots.
    Thanks

    hi
    I think you need to check your fiscal year varian before you do the MMPV. Fiscal year is set up by the FI consultant and it is deciding in which fiscal year period your current month belongs to.(Transaction -OB29)
    Ex:
    if you use K4 fiscal year variant then this october month is treated as 2010-07 period. Because the fiscal year starts from April and 2010 fiscal year starts from 2009 april.
    Calendar Year                 Fiscal year
    2009 april                =       2010 - 01
    2009 may                =       2010 - 02
    2009 Oct                 =       2010 - 07
    So first get the fiscal year and period accurately (I suggest get it from your FI guy) and put it in the MMPV
    If you accidentally close a wrong period dont forget to follow these notes too.
    545952,369637 AND 487381
    thanks & BR
    sandun

  • Same material master in two company codes with batch management

    Hi,
    There are two company codes in one client. In one batch management is already active. But in another company code batch management is not required. Is it possible to have batch management active in one company code and inactive in another company code where both the co. codes are in the same client? The same material master to be used in both company codes.
    Thanks,
    Satya.

    Hi Satyabarata,
    As far as you dont want to move the same materiel i.eStock Transfer with Inter comapy billing scenario then it  will be fine.
    If you try to Transfer a Batch manged material into a non batch manged CC it will work fine. But on the other hand when do via-versa the system will ask for the Batch information where the Batch management is active.
    If you want to use same Material Master for both CC then its not advisable.
    Please let me know if you need any other information.
    Thx.
    MJ

  • Material Ledger activation at Company Code Level

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement where Material Ledger need to be activated at Company level and not at single Plant Level. We are about to implement ML and would like to have periodic unit price calculated at company code level  (e.g. 1 material, 4 plants, 1 company = 1 periodic unit price).
    I went through the customization , it only refers to Plant level (Valuation area level)
    Could anybody throw light on this.
    Regards
    Barbara

    Hi,
    What is the valuation level?
    If the valuation is at plant level you can maintain different views at different plants of these company codes.
    If only name is different i think you would do better with the same material code, and if you still want to differentiate please create two different materials
    Regards,
    Prithviraj
    Edited by: Prithviraj Talekar on Feb 11, 2009 5:25 AM

  • More than one posting period variant for one company code

    Dear Colleagues,
    My question is if it's somehow possible to assign more than one posting period variant to one company code?  (I am not a FI specialist...)
    (We are using the new GL and would like to define a special posting period interval for a non-leading ledger. The c.codes already exists and are already assigned to a posting period variant.)
    The reason for why we would need an additional posting period variant for an existing c.code, is because we are already using both posting period intervals in t.code OB52.)
    Best regards    
    Viveka Schwartz

    Hi
    You can assign a PPV to the Non Leading ledger separately.. That means both Leading and NOn Leading ledgers can have separate PPVs
    Apart from this, no 3rd PPV is possible.. As Eli said, Validation is the only option, but I think Validations work for Leading ledgers only
    Br, Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for