Discount condition cannot be posted in Accounts

I have created 2 Discount conditions (accrual). These conditions need to be posted to accounts.
I have already assigned and account key and resp GLs (2 GL's for each in VKOA) to both conditions.
However, while posting to accounting it shows thats the account key is missing.
In the pric. procedure the account key is there yet, this is throwing a problem.
What could be creating this issue.
Thanks!
Pinky

Hi Natasha,
As per your communcation it is clear that the Condition are Accural conditions that means you will accumlate the Discount and then issue a Credit note for it. For this requirement you have to assign Account Key to the conditions aswell as assing a Account key in the Last coloumn of the Pricing procedure i.e.ACCRLS.
By assigning the A/c Key to accurals and in the A/c key column system will post the Discount to the respt. G/L and also accure the same for future issuing of Credit note.
Hope the above helps you.
REWARD if it helps you!!
Regards,
Ajinkya

Similar Messages

  • SD Staticall Condition Not Posting Into Accounting

    Dear All,
    Need your help. Urgent...
    My business requirement is to post Staticall condition value in G/L count. For that I did the following config.
    1. V/06: Configured new condition type ZCRL,with Cond. class :Discount or surcharge ,Calculat.type :Percentage and activated for 'Accruals'
    2. Assigned this ZCRL to Pricing procedure with account key and accruls.
    3. Maintian G/L accounts for both account keys and accruls in VK0A.
    However in billing document  I can see ZCRL condition type at Item level with account keys , but not posting in accounting.
    Pricing condition PR00 is posting into account.
    Could some body please help on this.
    Much appreciated your help.
    Thanks a lot.
    Regards,
    Jai

    Hi All,
    Many thanks for your prompt responce.
    In my further invistigation I found this is b'c of  IS-Oil. My client recently upgraded to IS-Oil and SD and IS-Oil table got corrupted.
    In sales order item condition 'New filed get updated i.e Invoice
    Cycle’ , which is coming from IS-oIL table.
    Pls check the below attachment.
    To reslove this issue, need to activate Split invoice cycle at Is-Oil billing document type.
    Much appreciated your help.
    Thanks a lot.
    Regards,
    Jai

  • Pricing condition without posting to accounting

    Hello,
    Currently the system config is:
    AR00  (discount)  = 50
    EWT (Tax statistical) - 10% = -5  ( needs to be statistical as per SAP)
    Total Credit   = 50 ( Pricing didnt take EWT )
    Pricing copied into Biling and posted correcty into Accounting
    We want to copy EWT value into a dummy cond called Z000
    Step 10   AR00    (discount)  == 50
    Step  50  EWT (Tax statistical - 10%)  = -5
    step 80    Z000 (copy of EWT) = 50 to 50  = 5 ( but we want this to be non statistical and at the same time no accounting key and no accrual key) - so that the value doesnt get copied into accounting
    Step 100   Total Credit = 45 (This is correct as per pricing ) and make sense for the Cust Ser Rep.
    Can any one help on how to achieve the Z000 condition technique in pricing w/o having account key and accrual key? Is it possible
    Does this make sense in FI as the EWT tax condition is already getting posted correctly in acoounting and we didnt want to touch it.
    So we are trying to achieve this if possible by having no accounting entry? is it possible
    Thanks for the help
    Points will be awarded for the help
    Regards
    SK

    Hello Anupam,
    Actually the EWT condition is posting the values correctly into accounting.
    Know for me to caculate the net value and populate it in the netvallue field I need the condition to be non statistical.
    If I make it non statistical, it give me a currency error and I check SAP OSS and they said that EWT condition in SD has to be statistical.
    SO know the option left is replicate this value into a condition which doesnt post to accoutning so that the pricing will pick it up and update the net value. But remember no posting to accoutning as my statistical condition is already doing it.
    This being said was trying to check if we can have condition without accoutning or accrual key or if we need to have somehting then how can we make sure that they dont post to accoutning.
    Thanks
    SK

  • GL Account : Cannot be posted to cost object, please check your entry

    Dear All,
    I've problem in general posting or in FBCJ (cash journal) ....
    When I try to make journal  : Debit Expense  and Credit Cash in F-02 or in FBCJ then I chose Post an error appear " Cannot be posted to cost object, please check your entry " ..
    Because GL account "Expense" assigned to cost element, I need to fill cost object ... when I filled it with Internal order or WBS, the error appeared , but there was no error when I filled with Cost center ....
    For your info there was no problem with Field Status Group ( I thought ) cause I ticked with Optional entry for WBS and IO ...
    Beside it, I've assigned the company code in Controlling Area and Operating Concern ...
    Network in WBS was in optional
    Please give me solutions
    BR,
    David Sindhu
    Edited by: david_sindhu on Jan 26, 2011 12:06 PM

    Hi Alex,
    The posting key was 40 and there was no problem as I choose Optional ..
    My WBS was not statistical ...
    Any idea ?
    Edited by: david_sindhu on Jan 27, 2011 3:18 AM

  • Exit to prevent Billing doc to post to accounting for Condition type

    Hi all,
    I have a requirement as below :
    A Sales order Y is created refererring to another Sales Order say X. Sales order X has one condition type which in the process has been removed. When Sales order Y created all the data from X is copied including the condition type( Now one of the condition type is not present in the system which is also copied to the Order Y). Now, when I genreate Billing document and then post to accounting doc, even though the particular condition type that is copied from 'X' is not present in the system, it is getting posted.
    Can you please help me if there is any exit to prvent the Billing doc to post to accounting based on the condition type.
    Regards,
    Uma Chandra Sekhar

    Hi,
    Use the user exit "RV60AFZC", form-routine : USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP.  Set the value of structure field VBRK-RFBSK to 'A' to block the creation of accounting document.
    Regards
    Vinod

  • Conditions for Pricing but dont want it to post in accounting (Non stat)

    Hello Gurus,
    Can we have a pricing condition which is non statistical and doesnt hit accounting?
    I dont want this to post to accounting, but just to calculate in the pricing so that I can get my net value.
    Can this be done?/
    Any help is very much appreciated
    THanks
    SK

    Hello Surana,
    We are trying to implement extended with holding taxes for our customers.
    As per SAP this condition has to be statistical. Even though this is statistical it is posting to accoutning as a debit entry coerrectly.
    But in my pricing since this is statistical value, pricing is not taking into consideration. When I print my invoice total net value is picked up from NETWR field.
    So the aim over here is to update my pricing net value without hitting or posting to accounting.
    For this I wanted to make a copy of this existing condition and make the rate as 100% of my EWT condition. But I cant make this statistical as my pricing will not take into account. So need new condition without any accounting or accrual key so that it can be calculated into pricing net value and not in accounting.
    Any suggestions or ideas?
    Thanks
    SK

  • Transaction cannot be posted due to error in price determination

    Hi Experts,
    I am procuring components thro purchase order created on 2007.
    When i tried to do GR with respect to Inbound delivery, it is throwing error as " Transaction cannot be posted due to error in price determination"
    Please suggest.

    Hi,
    1. Check accounting view of material in material master.
    2. Check Conditions is available or not in MEK3 t.code
    3. OR see OSS notes 447374 and 446831 and 457511
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Post on account in f-58 for customers

    Hi all,
    I have simple question. when i do "post on account" in f-58 for customers,when i go back and see in fbl5n for that  customer i see that the amount is added to the open item where as when i do "post on account" for vendors the amount is deducted from the open items.
    Can any one please explain me this concept.
    Regards,
    Sneha

    Hello,
    It seems that you making the payment (return payment) to the customer on the advances that you have received from Customer. You cannot make the payment on customer invoices as these are already debit items.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Problem while posting to accounts..

    Hi experts,
    im getting the following errors after  posting to accounts.The incorrect documents have been created.there were 2 error messages.
    +1.No creditor with the search key 1100 LFB1 PERNR 00002338 has been found+
    Message no. 3G213
    Diagnosis
    No vendor account could be assigned to the search key
    Company code: 1100
    Table: LFB1
    Field: PERNR
    Matchcode: 00002338
    2.+Required field GL_ACCOUNT was not transferred in parameter ACCOUNTGL+
    Message no. RW602
    Diagnosis
    Field GL_ACCOUNT is required in parameter ACCOUNTGL for processing the document. The document is incomplete without this field.
    System Response
    The document cannot be processed.
    Procedure
    Enter a valid value in field GL_ACCOUNT in parameter ACCOUNTGL.
    Please advice me to resolve above 2 errors.
    Regards,
    Vi Sai.
    Type the Error in the search forum you will get lot of threads related to this issue
    Edited by: Sikindar on Mar 22, 2010 1:54 PM

    Dear Vicky,
    I m facing the same problem with some of employee no. and also the following error for others.
    "No data was transferred in parameter ACCOUNTPAYABLE"
    Kindly suggest me what should I configure to resolve this error.
    Awaiting for your reply.
    Thanks & regards,
    Neeta

  • Posting to Accounting: Retroactive Posting after a change in the GL account

    Hello all,
    i would like to ask you about a problem that we face in a live system throught the integration HR-FI. We have already run live posting to accounting until the end of November. But, the client wants us to change the account of a wage type. We have created a new symbolic account because the new account is an expense account whereas the previous account was a balance sheet account. We have used also the user exit in RPCIPE00 as we have different employee groupings in our system. The problem is that when we run posting to accounting for December and there is retroactive calculation the system debit/credit again the old wage type again without having results in December for this wage type.
    Customizing : 
    01.2010-11.2010 DEBIT : X1(BALANCE SHEET)
                                CREDIT: Z1
    122010-12.9999  DEBIT : X2(EXPENSE ACCOUNT)
                                CREDIT: Z1
    Example:
    11.2010 -> Payroll calculation for WT01:100 EUROS. Posting of this WT01: Debit : X1 (100EUROS) Account ,Credit : Z1 Account ((100EUROS)
    12.2010 -> Retroactive calculation for november for other wage types. Not WT01. But in the posting to accounting for WT01 there is debit/credit. Note: After 01.12 we have the change in the posting customizing of this WT01.
                  DEBIT                CREDIT
    X1                                  (100EUROS)
    Z1      (100EUROS)       (100EUROS)
    X2      (100EUROS)
    How can i stop the retroactive posting that takes place after the change? This wage type WT01 SHOULD NOT be posted in December.
    I am looking forward to your feedback.
    Thank you in advance.
    Sissi

    Thank you for your quick response.
    I have already delimited Wage Type WT01 and used the new symbolic account:
    Customizing : 
    01.2010-11.2010       DEBIT : X100 Symbolic (BALANCE SHEET)
                                      CREDIT: Z100 Symbolic
    12.2010-12.9999        DEBIT : X200  Symbolic(EXPENSE ACCOUNT)
                                      CREDIT: Z100 Symbolic
    FI:  X100 symbolic  Linked to X1 ACCOUNT
         X200 symbolic  Linked to X2 ACCOUNT(NEW ONE)
         Z100 symbolic  Linked to Z1 Account
    The problem is that after posting for December i have 100 euros as debit in Account X2 (the new account) and 100 euros in the old account X1 as credit. IN Z1 account i have no problem as the result is zeroed. According to the customer, they should not have these amounts in X1,X2 accounts as there is no retro-calculation for this specific WType.
    Accounts                  DEBIT                     CREDIT
    X1   :                                <->                   (100EUROS as CREDIT)
    Z1   :                    (100EUROS as DEBIT)               (100EUROS as CREDIT)
    X2   :                   (100EUROS as DEBIT)                         <->                       
    I hope the schema above will depict how the posting is performed after the change in account of the wage type.
    So, you suggest that this cannot be ceased as the system works in this way?
    Thank you a lot.
    Sissy.

  • Delivery free of charge Invoice should not Post to accounting

    Hello,
    As per Client's specific Business process , till now ZERO value Invoice(Delivery Free of charge) is created (This is not SAP Standard).
    No accounting document is generated because of ZERO value of Invoice.
    Only COPA Document is generated.
    ZERO value invoice is generated because of all Pricing Conditions are Statistical in Pricing Procedure.
    Now , Requirement is to create Invoice with Values & also Print values in Invoice, without posting it to accounting.
    The simplest way to do it to remove Statistical check from all Pricing conditions , Values will start Printing.
    But in this case ,Invoice getting started posted to accounting.
    Q:- Please let me know the simplest way to create Invoice (Delivery Free of Charge) with values but on the same time , it should not post to accounting only COPA should be generated.
    (AR Electronic Invoice)
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Vikas

    Hi,
    Free of charge Deliveries are basically of 2 types.
    1. When you send Promotinal materials for display purpose, Physician samples in pharma industry etc.
    Those materials do not have any commercial values, they are send free-of-charge.
    We process those materials with Order Type FD (Free-of-charge Delivery).
    2. Another case, when suppose you had sent 10 units of some material (commercially valued materials) for which customer has already paid the money to you.
    After that suppose customer has found that 2 units are damaged or defective for which he has returned the 2 units to you.
    Here, you have 2 options to compensate the customer, either you will issue a Credit Memo or you will replace with fresh units for those 2 returned units.
    If, you will replace 2 fresh units to the customer, then it is called "Subsequent Delivery Free-of -chrge".
    The Order Type used for the above is "SDF".
    In this case, even though the material is a commercially valued material but we send it as free-of-charge as Customer has already has paid for it.
    In both the above case, may it be "Free-of-charge Delivery (FD)" or "Subsequent Free-of-charge Delivery (SDF)", both the transactions are not relevant for Billing.
    You can check the same in Sales document Item category KLN and KLX, both are not relevant for Billing. That means you can not create a commercial Invoice for those transactions.
    In the above case, if required we create Proforma Invoice with reference to the Delivery document.
    Proforma Invoice is a dummy Invoice and  not posted to Accounting.
    So, in your case you can create a Proforma Invoice.
    Regards
    Pradyumna

  • Billing docs are 2x posted to accounting

    Dear all,
    I am currently struggling with the following problem - would be great if somebody could help me with ideas about the root cause:
    VBRK-RFBSK -- 'Posting status'
    Accounting relevance of export billing docs was set to D -- 'not relevant' due to wrong programming.
    We have manually corrected RFBSK-status to A -- 'Relevant for accounting'.
    T-code VFX3 -- 'Release billing documents for Accounting'
    The documents could be posted to accounting some weeks ago. Now I was informed that billing documents were posted twice to COPA / FICO, causing a dysbalance as turnover was booked twice. Creating a credit note cannot be considered due to manufacturing costs etc.
    Solution proposal from COPA support
    ...was to revert everything down to the deliveries, and then to create a correct billing document.
    But reverting 1 document should of course correct 2 bookings! My expectation is that the billing index was not correctly updated when VBRK-RFBSK changed to C -- 'Posting document was created'. So the system ignored that posting was already done. (I am not sure about that, as I am not familiar to FICO / COPA processes).
    Thanks again for your valuable help!
    t.

    Dear all,
    could OSS note 1261286 solve the problem?
    Please let me know your thoughts!
    Thanks!
    t.

  • DIscount condition types mapping to value field  (+/-)

    Hi,
    1)While mapping SD condition types to Copa value fields, do we need to check the transfer +/- symbol for all discount condition types...
    or when do we need to check it..
    2) In our case we have some 4 to 5 discount condition types mapped to copa... If we check that symbol, as discount will always be negative system is posting discount values in negative in copa. At the time of report execution, since we give formula as Sales Less discount and discount is already negative in system it is getting added... so we are planning to change formula as sales + discounts... is that approach is right?
    Reg
    Karthik

    Hi Ajay,
    Thanks for your quick reply... generally for which condition types do we need to check this indicator in ke4i... for all discount condition types and rounding off condition types... is that right? Because as I told we have some 4 to 5 discount condition types and we have ticked for only one discount condition type which is mostly used...
    Reg
    Karthik

  • Erro"Transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination"MIGO

    Hi All,
    I am facing error message "Transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination" for "X-field conversion" while posting GR document against Scheduling agreement.
    I have checked the Validity periods of conditions maintained in Scheduling agreement and it was within validity.
    In Material master - Price Control - V (Moving average price/periodic unit price)
    Standard price              0.00 
    Per. unit price             1.58 
    Price unit             1         
    Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Cheers!
    Sujay Chinchole

    your material master displaying Zero price .maintain the price in material master.and also check why material has Zero price.
    what is the price  in  material moving average field
    Edited by: Sridhar Jayavarapu on Mar 13, 2009 7:17 AM

  • Stop posting to accounting

    Hi all,
    I need to create an SD transaction, where the customer does not need to pay tax due to gov policy. The tax condition type is not allowed to be posted to accounting. But, this tax condition type is needed to print the tax report, which describes the tax is payed by gov.
    How can I stop posting 1 cond. type to accounting in Billing doc. when I release to accounting this billing doc.?
    This condition type class is taxes.
    I have created new cond. type, new pricing procedure. All of these are created by clicking Copy As button from existing worked-condition types and worked-pricing procedure.
    The different is, I have omitted the acc.key in this new cond. type.
    Regards,
    Rizki Harris

    hI...
    I have set my condition type into Statistical, but I encounter another error :
    Tax statement item missing for tax code A1
    Message no. FF805
    Diagnosis
    No tax item exists for tax code A1 in a G/L account item. A possible cause is an incorrect transfer of parameters by the application to the Accounting interface.
    Procedure
    Enter an OSS message.
    What should I do then...?
    Regards,
    Rizki Harris

Maybe you are looking for

  • PDF Data Connection with Access 2003

    Who ever can help me! I am trying to make a data connection on my pdf form using "Adobe Live Cycle designer 7.0" to my access database. I already did the conncetion...the problem here is that once the submit button is clicked i don't have any returne

  • How can I use FK description in a BC4J data query component?

    Hi all, I am facing the following problem. Although I use renderers in the DataEdit component for displaying the descriptions of the FKs this is not useful for the BC4J data query components. How can I get the same functionality as in the dataEdit co

  • Quick Multiple Library Question.

    Hi all, My wife's iPhoto library is hitting 60gigs. Time to split it up. My goal is to keep only this last year (2011) on her laptop and have years 2001-2010 in a separate library on and external HD. Now this library is ten plus years of cropping, ad

  • Snail download speed from Digital River, now download locked

    I need urgent help with download of my Adobe purchase (Order number: 25382727724)! Only a few days ago, I purchased Adobe CS6 Master Collection from Digital River. However, I've had a painful downloading experience. Oftentimes, the shown downloading

  • Cloning of a LINUX with MAXDB problem

    Hello all, We cloned (copied) a complete Linux server (AAA) with SAP using MAXDB, target server was ZZZ. The copy was very successful, nothing missed. Edited the profile parameters and changed all ENVironment variables changing anything from AAA to Z