Discounts not reflected on bill

I moved house in November and, having been a Verizon customer for many years, signed up with them again for a 2-year contract. I'm beginning to regret it.
I am having a ongoing issue with my billing. Numerous calls to agents have not resolved this, so I am turning to this forum so see if anyone can advise.
I signed up for Triple Play and have a confimation from Verizon stating the cost:
Verizon Triple Play: $104.99
The following discounts were included:
$10 Exclusive Online Ordering Credit Included
$25 Bundle 24 Mo. Credit Included
$20 Triple Play 24 Mo. Discount Included
However, $30 of the discounts are not being reflected on the bill and I need this to be added back in. Only the $25 bundle discount is being applied.
A previous call to an agent was resolved with a $30 'credit' being applied to my account - but instead of being credited, it was added as a fee!
Can anyone contact me to sort this out before I cancel and go to Cablevision!

Hi big_apple_al ,
Sorry you are having difficulty with your billing. An agent with access to your account will reach out to you directly by email, private message in the Forums and/or the billing telephone number on your Verizon account for more information or to help you resolve your issue. Please remember to check your spam/junk folder if you do not hear from an agent.

Similar Messages

  • Ship to party and Bill to party not reflecting in marketing documents

    Hi,
        Ship to party and Bill to party not reflecting in marketing documents inspite of defining it in BP Master data.why does it happen.we are on 8.8 version and this is happening in Livedatabase.
    Thanks,
    Mansoor Baig

    Hi Mansoor,
    Is this for new transactions or existing ones that went thru the 8.8 upgrade? Is this for new BP that the address doesn't show or existing (if you have other transactions with no address problem then it shouldn't be the address format setup unless something happened in the upgrade).
    Heather

  • Discount not carried as promised

    I originally signed up for BT Infinity 20gb with a -£15.00 per month discount for the first six months. I decided to upgrade to BT Infinity Unlimited. The BT website says the following:
    (http://bt.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/36397/~/what-happens-to-my-contract-if-i-upgrade-my-b...)
    When you upgrade your BT Broadband - for example from Broadband to Unlimited Broadband extra - you transfer with it any discounts as well as the remaining months of your current contract.
    The only exception to this is if the higher broadband option has a special offer or if you're moving from BT broadband to BT Infinity.
    I called the BT customer service line to make sure I could carry over my -£15.00 discount onto a new Infinity Unlimited package and 4 things happened during that call on 15 December:
    1. The customer service rep said, yes, that was BT's policy and I would retain my discount as per the website's claim.
    2. She put me on hold for 5+ minutes to verify with her supervisor.
    3. She confirmed the "yes" and said she added notes to my account explaining the situation so that anyone dealing with it further would understand. I heard her type these notes and say them under her breath as she did this while I was on the line.
    4. She told me that if my first bill did not reflect the retained -£15.00 discount to call them back and they would rectify it.
    The first bill came. No discount applied for one and a bit months. I called the help line and after 45 minutes of transfers and holding, the new rep told me that "unfortunately" I had chosen a package that "does not come with a discount" and that there were no notes on my account and no record of a retainable discount in the sale of the new Unlimited package.
    I presented verbally all the information above and all he could do was log a complaint, for which I have not heard back about. He said it would take 4-5 days. So yesterday, I received a text acknowledging that I had logged a complaint and saying it would take TEN days to hear back from BT. Meanwhile I am owed a full discound for the coming month and a prorated discount for the part of a month.
    Can anyone explain to me why the above link, explaining the rules, does not apply simply to this situation? None of the above exceptions to the discout rule apply to my situation. I have not signed up to a higher broadband option with a special offer and I have not moved from BT broadband to BT Infinity (I've moved from Infinity 20GB to Infinity Unlimited). My complaint reference is VOL012-************.

    If you would like to try Live Chat they should be able to help you.
    There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
    BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

  • Discount not consistent?

    I currently receive a 15% government employee discount that I am grateful for.    However,  several of my coworkers receive 20% discounts on their Verizon bills??????  How does this work?   Just asking..... Thanks. 

    Perhaps the discount agreement through your particular agency was reworked since your coworkers were hired or visa versa.  If these coworkers that get a 20% discount were hired before you then they are likely still getting a discount based on an old agreement which will stay in effect until Verizon confirms they are still eligible for a discount (which happens periodically).  However if those coworkers were hired after you then the discount agreement with your agency may have changed since you enrolled.  Again Verizon will not generally amend your discount to reflect a better discount unless you cask them to renew your discount according to the new agreement.  Much like Verizon is not required to initiate an employer discount on your behalf.  You have to request that you receive the employer discount any changes that result in a better discount will only affect you if you ask them to update your discount rate.  Hope that helps?

  • Free goods not reflecting in PO from Info Record

    Hi,
    My requirement is , when ever i order 100 qty from a vendor 10 qty should be delivered free of cost.
    I am trying to maintain Info record for the same..
    Now when i created PO for the same...I entered 100 qty..it is not reflecting 10 qty in another line in PO..
    Where i am wrong?
    Uts

    HI,
    Have maintained the values in
    *Spro-Purchasing-Discount in kind-Define & assign discount in kind schema-Maintain free goods schema*
    It will be available in standard SAP if not do the following configuration
    Here
    Usage -N
    Application -M
    create procedure NR0001
    In control data
    step-10
    Cond Type-NR00
    Then save.
    Next
    Define free good schema
    Here assign ur schema grp of vendor
    Then assign the procedure created previously (i-e) NR001 & THEN SAVE.
    The above configuration is very important for the free goods scenario to work.
    Then go to MM and in purchasing view and give the value 2.
    Then in MBN1 create the condition record for the IR -0.
    Then create the PO it will work definetly.
    9884057038
    murugan
    Edited by: Murugan mgl on Jun 17, 2009 6:58 AM
    Edited by: Murugan mgl on Jun 17, 2009 6:59 AM

  • SAP SD Material Determination not reflected in assigned sales document type

    Hi Experts,
    I have implemented customized material determination, with requirement to change the UoM of the entered material, from GJ to MJ. I have assigned the procedure to 3 document types:
    1. sales order type
    2. credit memo request
    3. debit memo request
    However, this setup is only reflected in the 1st sales document assigned with the procedure. It is not reflected in the credit or debit memo request.
    I have turned on the material determination analysis in sales order. Per my checking during credit memo request creation, the analysis indicated that the condition is found successfully. But the UoM did not change in the document.
    Please assist.
    Thank you.
    HJMY
    Edited by: HJMY on Sep 20, 2011 1:24 PM

    Hi Ravi,
    Thx for your reply.
    But I am creating credit/debit memo request without reference to billing.
    When I create credit/debit memo request, the material determination is triggered.
    Per my test today for credit memo request, I found that the material determination is triggered.
    However, the substition UoM is not reflected in the credit memo request document.
    The result is reflected only in sales order.
    Please help.
    Edited by: HJMY on Sep 21, 2011 3:28 AM

  • Date Customer Exit in the query is not reflecting in the workbook

    Hello.
    We have a BI 7.0 Query where we have a restriction for req del date and billing date to show the month of current date - 2.
    We have written 2 customer exit variables and we have restricted the same. The query is working well.
    For Broadcasting, we have created a workbook for this query and saved it under a role.
    The workbook is fine running for the current month., But if the month changes to the next, the workbook is not reflecting the same.
    Still only Old dates are available in the workbook.
    Please let me know if i am doing any mistake

    Hi Karthik,
    If the customer exit variable is of type i_step = 1, ie if it is a manual entry variable as well, then this will not get updated based on teh month of execution.
    Kindly check the article below for info.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/enterprise-data-warehousing/how%20to%20update%20variable%20values%20in%20broadcast%20settings%20dynamically.pdf
    Regards.
    Shafi.

  • Item not relevant for Billing but still exist in Billing due list VF04

    Hi Experts,
    I am experiencing an issue where this is an STO scenario.
    The PO->DN->PGI->GR (Receiving plant) where there is no invoice required as its with the same company.
    However, I can see there is one Delivery still getting reflected in VF04 due list.
    Standard Delivery type NL has been used and already checked the item categoy relevance and its
    maintained as J ( Relevant for deliveries across EU countries.) I dont think so this was billed earlier as I had already checked the Deliveries created with same item category for past six months and they have not been billed.
    Is there any other settings that needed to be checked apart from item cateogry and verifying how the same combination of Delivery type and item category worked earlier?
    IBest Regards,
    Ramesh

    Dear Ramesh,
    You may be right that with the same item category settings, there were no billing item generated (with the billing indicator as J in your Item Category) earlier. But how now it is happenning the other way round.
    Here are the reasons:
    The outbound delivery is relevant for billing if: (YOUR PRESENT CASE)
    1. The Plants abroad active field is selected (found in Customizing under Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Tax on Sales/Purchases -> Basic Settings -> Plants Abroad -> Activate Plants Abroad)
    2. Country of departure (country where the plant is located) and destination country (country where the ship-to party is located) need to be different EU countries.
    So, if you dont satisfy the above two conditions you will not get the billing item and that's what has happenned in your past 6 Months.
    Regards
    Edited by: SAP2020 on Nov 13, 2009 4:41 AM

  • Automatic clearing of credit note with its billing document

    Hi all,
    I have a problem during the "release to accounting" of an SD credit note.
    The real problem is about the automatic clearing of the credit note with the billing document that it refers.
    I have only one clearing criteria in customizing on the field ZUONR (assignment number), and the credit note have the right value (the number of the billing document).
    The SD billing document and its FI document have the same number, and the credit note too.
    When the credit note is passed to FI (release to accounting automatically), the user wants that it is also cleared.
    How can I do it? Can I do it?
    Thanks in advance
    Alessandra

    Does it work now if you run it?
    If not you need to run the clearing in test mode and see how it proposes to do the clearing?
    Are you saying you have a billing doc for say 100 Euro and a credit for 100 Euro.
    Both the credit and the billing doc have the same value in the assignment field and f.13 for account type "D" is just set to clear against ZUONR.
    If that is the case it should work, however check for small things like discount being due on the billing document and not the credit note and therefore the net amount of the billing document may be less than the credit note.
    Please award points if this is useful.

  • Indent changing is possible but changes are not reflecting after refresh

    Hello all,
    I am facing one issue with alignment in the BEX. i need to changed the the result rows. initally the indent is 2 , am changing it to 1 and saving as existing report. after  refreshing the workbook. the changes are not reflecting. can anybody provide me some inputs on these. any help is appreciated.

    Hi Priya,
    You need to Implement the following SNOTE's for these changes.
    Union Budget 2015: As per Finance Bill 2015, the Government has implemented amendments to existing sections and introduced new sections in the Income Tax Act. Changes have been made in the following topics:
    Tax Surcharge Rate
    Increase in Conveyance Allowance
    Section 80
    Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme: The Government has launched this new deposit scheme for the minor girl child. This is a savings scheme that can be opened by the natural (biological) or legal guardian of a girl child aged below 10 years. Related Notes:
    2139208 - Union Budget Changes – 2015
    2138605 - Sec80C: Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme
    Upcoming Developments:
    PF Admin Charges Revision
    Professional Tax for Mizoram & Nagaland states
    Average Rate of Tax
    Regards,
    Venkat Polisetty

  • Custom theme changes are not reflecting after SP upgrade in Portal 7.3

    Hi,
    I am facing issue with a custom theme after the upgrade of Portal 7.3 from SP7 to SP12.
    The landscape has the integration of Web Dynpro ABAP components in Portal. The custom font color set for the field name is not reflecting, instead it show the font color in blank.
    Looking for your inputs.
    Thanks, Ansar

    Hi Priya,
    You need to Implement the following SNOTE's for these changes.
    Union Budget 2015: As per Finance Bill 2015, the Government has implemented amendments to existing sections and introduced new sections in the Income Tax Act. Changes have been made in the following topics:
    Tax Surcharge Rate
    Increase in Conveyance Allowance
    Section 80
    Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme: The Government has launched this new deposit scheme for the minor girl child. This is a savings scheme that can be opened by the natural (biological) or legal guardian of a girl child aged below 10 years. Related Notes:
    2139208 - Union Budget Changes – 2015
    2138605 - Sec80C: Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme
    Upcoming Developments:
    PF Admin Charges Revision
    Professional Tax for Mizoram & Nagaland states
    Average Rate of Tax
    Regards,
    Venkat Polisetty

  • Header PO discount, not apportioned to line item

    Hi MM Gurus
    My client wants to create a multi line item PO and also will like to include the header discount (value based). The client does not want the discount to be apportioned to each line item. He wants the line items to be received and paid at its original cost. Can someone suggest if this can be done and how?
    Here is the example:
    PO with 3 lines
    Line one 100 each @ 25 = $2500
    Line two 200 eaxh @ 30 = $6000
    Line three 150 each @ 10 = $1500
    Header discount = $500
    Line items still remain at their actual values. The discount is not applied to line items. Upon LIV, the PO line items received at actual price, but the overall discount adjusted.
    Any guidance will be appreciated.
    Regards,
    Vinay

    Hi.
    I'm not sure if the following info help you.
    But how about to set the "Condition is used for
    statistics" flag V_T683S-KSTAT?
    You can set it in your pricing procedure and
    for your condition type.
    As far as I know, the header condition is not reflected to
    the net price.(Though reflected to the "effective price".)
    When GR, GR/IR will be from net price.
    Best regards.
    Keiichiro

  • Itunes does not reflect Books purchased

    I have purchased books over a year ago using my iPad 2.  I can't see in Itunes books purchased over a year ago.  When syncing Ipad to ITunes Books library does not reflect the books purchased, Why? Does anyone know?
    Thank you.
    Jaime

    Hey there Fritzme,
    It sounds like you are unable to download book purchases you made over a year ago. If you haven't already, I would check your purchased history with this article to see if you can find them there:
    iTunes Store: See your purchase history and web order numbers
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2727
    If you see them there but cannot find them to redownload using the iBooks app, they may have been hidden and can be unhidden using this article:
    iTunes Store: Hiding and unhiding purchases
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4919
    If you cannot find it there either, then per the first article you may need to contact the iTunes Store support directly:
    For help with an older purchase, contact iTunes Store support and select Purchases, Billing, and Redemption
    Thank you for using Apple Support Communities.
    All the very best,
    Sterling

  • Gamers Club Unlock 20% discount not showing up at checkout

    I have gamers club unlocked. It was activated yesterday in the store, yet whenever I go to purchase a game the 20% is not showing up. I cant even check to see if the GCU is linked to my online account. Hopefully someone can resolve this for me.

    Hello victorsvaliant,
    Welcome to the forum, and congrats on becoming Unlocked!
    I looked over your account using the email address you registered with the forum, and I believe that I can explain why the 20% discount is not reflected in your online shopping cart.  Your BestBuy.com and My Best Buy™ accounts would need to be linked in-order for the discount to apply.  It actually looks like you may have three active My Best Buy™ accounts, which could also be contributing to the issue.
    With that being said, I would suggest that we merge your accounts and then link that primary account to your BestBuy.com account.  That should then allow you to utilize the 20% discount on BestBuy.com.  To gather some additional information and further discuss a merge with you, I will be sending you a private message.  You can check your private messages by logging into the forum and clicking on the yellow envelope at the top.
    Merging My Best Buy™ Accounts
    Thank you for posting
    Derek|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Bought credit : not reflecting in account

    Hi,
    I am travelling and needed to make calls. I bought Skype credit but its not reflecting. Then I bought Subscription in a hope that it might work. I think my account is stuck and needs a reset. How and Who can do this.?... Please direct me to email/web address.
    Regards,
    S

    Hi Sachin
    From what I gather from your Qs, is that the accounting document was NOT created at the time of billing
    If thats the case, go to VFX3, input your SD document and execute, try releasing the document using the green flag, then go to GOTO --> Notes and u will see the log of why the document was not released to accounting
    The log might help troubleshoot the error
    Rukshana

Maybe you are looking for