Distribution of costs problem

hi,
i am getting a message like Customizing error: Business transaction groups are not current, when i am trying to use the t.code: ksv5 (Distribution). Please help me to solve this issue

Hi,
Please use the Business Transaction RKIV ( Actual Over Head Distribution ) At T Code KANK
Bya....

Similar Messages

  • Distribution of cost problem

    hi,
    i am getting a  message like Customizing error: Business transaction groups are not current, when i am trying to use the t.code: ksv5 (Distribution). Please help me to solve this issue

    Check note 101206
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Distribution of Costs from CCA to CO-PA

    Hi All,
    Can someone please help me find a solution to the following scenario?
    There is a requirement to distribute costs from CCA to Cust/Prod level in CO-PA.
    *The cost allocations factors can only be provided at the Customer Group/Product level.
    *Using regular assessment cycles in CO-PA it is possible to distribute these costs to Customer Group/Product level.
    *However these costs are to be distributed further to the Customer/Product level in CO-PA based on the revenue value field.
    Any suggestions on how this can be done? Can I use top down distribution?
    Regards,
    KK

    Option 1:
    Step 1 - create assessment to COPA (KEU1). Ensure that you enter customer group and product in the receiver characteristics (second tab)
    Step 2- use top down distribution to distribute from customer group to customer.
    Please refer to SAP help on top down distribution to see how top-down distribution works if you want to retain 'product' characteristics. They have given examples.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/7a/4c48c64a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    Second option:
    Step 1 - Carry out top down distribution of the cost allocation factors from customer group/product to customer/group.
    Step 2 - Create assessment cycles at customer/product level.
    Second option may be a better solution from data volume point of view beacsue top-down-distribution creates two records for sender and receiver in COPA. I am assuming that number of records for top down distribution of cost allocation factors will be less as compared to top down distribution of actual costs from multiple cost centers.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,

  • Distribution of cost over periods in detailed planning in CCA KP06

    Good Day everyone
    Please advice how to control distribution of cost over periods in Detailed planning in Cost center accounting. KP06.
    When detailed planning is carried out which is integrated with MM, distribution of cost over periods is automatically set (02 distribution as before) and i cannot manually set the distribution key to 0 or 1
    We are using ECC6
    How can i control manual distribution of plan cost while remaining in Detailed planning.

    Hi,
    You can distribute your planned costs at activity level based on the distributionkey you specified. The distribution is done for the entire duration of activity depending on the Dist key you select. If you do not put any Dist key, then the costs would be distributed equally across the entire duration of activity. If you want to have equal distribution of costs, you can use DK- SAP020 which distributes on earliest dates of activity using Factory calender. If you want you can also define your own DK in SPRO under: Production->capacity requirements planning->operations->capacity requirements->distribution.
    Hope this clarifies..
    Best regards..

  • Distribution from cost center to order

    hi all
    when I  do the distribution from cost center to order with "ksu5“
    error message"不允许 "实际间接费用分摊"(ORD103601000058)"
    "not allowed actual overhead distribution ,ORD103601000058)
    anyone can help me ?thanks in advance...
    Edited by: DUNBAR XUE on Apr 22, 2008 10:53 AM

    Well, there are other ways of doing this, than trying to assess using CCtr Assessment Cycles.
    You could use a Costing Sheet to collect the costs and apportion to the material. This us the idea behind Overhead Cost Allocation.
    Alternatively, you could use an Activity Based Costing template for the apportionment. Create a Business Process and have your Cost Centre assess costs to the Business Process by the end of the month. Now run template allocation and, all the config being okay (this is the catch), you will see this costs on the Production Order / Product Cost Collector / Material, etc.
    All of these require some config, but definitely you cannot assess from a CCtr to a Production Order. You are better off defining a Costing Sheet for this one.
    Cheers.

  • The performance of Distribution of Cost Object Hierarchy Costs.

    Dear SAP Gurus.
    I am checking the function and the performance about Cost Object Hierarchies distribution with Control Through Variance Key.
    The number of production orders assigned to COH is about 100,000 per month.
    All orders will be closed at current month and new 100,000 production order will be assigned to COH at next month.
    My concern is about performance of Distribution of Cost Object Hierarchy Costs
    because a huge number of orders will be accumulatedly assigned to the Cost Object Hierarchies.
    I think that the COH will be distributed with not bad performance.
    (Actually I want that to be OK.)
    What's your opinion about that?
    Sincerely.
    Mahnkwi.

    Hi Mahnkwi,
    Sender-/receiver-relations should definitely be below 1:1000 or even below 1:500. This depends on other factors like general size of the hierarchy and data to be processed as well. This hierarchy needs to be restructured. In case you do this the
    distribution needs to be reversed first.
    Below are some other hints on performance in KKPX
    - Parallel processing should be used.(note [386508|https://css.wdf.sap.corp/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=0000386508])
    - Switch off detail lists since the consume lots of memory.
    - Old orders should be archived.
    Note [77718|https://css.wdf.sap.corp/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=0000077718] also explains tips to avoid the memory error for transaction KKPX or KKPY. As note explains, you should consider
    whether a distribution of the cost elements according to their origin is required; if not, the corresponding indicator should not be set in the costing view of the materials.
    If many error message is issued in the error log, this may have bad effect on the memory of your server. In this case, you should make these error message "not to be displayed" by message control in IMG.
    Regards,
    Declan

  • Actual cost distribution in cost object hierarchies

    Hi all,
    I cannot distribute the actual costs collected on a cost object hierarchy since the costs are retrieved from an assessment cycle with a cost element with category 42 (assessment).
    I would like to assign my production cost centers balances to cost object hierarchy and then distribute it with transaction KKPX - Distribution of cost object hierarchy costs.
    Would someone have any idea how I could proceed?
    Thanks in advance.
    Ronan

    No answer to this thread

  • Reg.Negative delivery cost problem in PO release

    Dear Friends
    '' PO cannot be released due to negative delivery costs" this is my client requirement, I am unable to understand this. Please explain and give the solution.
    Thanks
    Rajakumar.K

    how can you have negative delivery costs?
    that means you order material, get it delivered by a carrier, and then the carrier pays you (instead of you pay carrier)?
    Please explain your PO process in a bit more detail.
    maybe this thread with a similar problem can help you:
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1516469

  • Costing problem while running Process order

    Hi,
    This is a  problem relating to costing of HALB material.. While doing process order for a fert material (BOM of FERT material contains a HALB and two ROH materials) a window occurs while saving ' Error when calculating costs, see log'. Why is this happening? I have checked the BOM , all components are subjected to cost relevancy (X). For HALB material no values are manually maintained in planned price 1,2,3 fields in Costing 2 view of material master. Do we have to manually maintain or will it be taken from the ROH materials in HALB BOM. For ROH materials values are comin in planned price 1,2,3 fields in Costing 2 view . If this has to be done what is the configuration. The ultimate issue is while running process order for FERT material no costing is happening for HALB material.Pls share your suggestions. Rewards assured.
    regards
    Ashok

    Hi,
    when you have raw semifinish and finish material as in sequence then first order of semifinish has to be created and it will capture raw material cost and other expences if incurred after confirmation of semifinish material you will be able to create a finish material production order b' cause that semi- finish material yo have to consume for finsh order.
    if at all first sfg order has updated the price of sfg (after settlement of order) then it will take correct price for finish material
    reward points if you find it useful.

  • Changing quantities distribution by cost center in MIGO

    Hi experts,
    Sometimes, we create a purchase order and we distribute quantities on several cost centers.
    Then, in the MIGO transaction, the distribution is made with the quantities indicated in the purchase order.
    I wish I could change these quantities when receiving goods. Do you know how to do it ?
    Thanks for your help !
    Philippe

    Hi,
    i  am not sure about cost center..
    ya but we can distribute batch wise or storage location wise
    and there is "Icon" distribute Qty in MIGO
    Regards
    kailas Ugale

  • Material costing problem in import to arrive at batch profitability?

    Dear all,
    Here my client requirement is to arrive at a material profitability with respect to that batch(shipment), but some times in import procurement exact profitability will not be arrive due to practical problems, which are
    1. freight & demurrage paid to shipper is not the exact cost which need to be incurred on to material because the freight is imaginary (20%) in order to have assessable value at the time of PO, however this can be adjusted at the time invoice but what about the demurrage demurrage paid by company to shipper will be in turn collected from handling agent, and hence net demurrage will not be known at the time of PO.
    Kindly suggest me on this to arrive at batchwise profitability with respect tom material?
    regards,
    Sanjana....

    Batch management is used to safe gaurd the homogenity fo material.
    Batches also maintained if you want to split value of the material
    Batched are identified with batch numbers. These numbers are created manually or dynamically while entering goods receipt.
    *One batch can be posted once.
    Batch will have two statuses Un-restricted and Batch restricted.*
    Batches can be maintained with classification with which we can assign some characteristics like quality related for shelf life related.
    To activate the batchmanagement for a material you must select the batch management check box in material master purchasing view or in general plant storage.
    Manual creation:
    Create Batch -> MSC1N
    Enter material
    Batch number (Unique for material)
    Create PO -> Click on batch tab -> Assign batch number (created) and Post.
    Batch with Classification:
    Create Characteristics : CT04
    Create Class: CL02 -> Click or char tab -> Enter Characteristics.
    Create Material with Classification View -> Select Class type.
    Just try like this you will get it and create PO and check the posting with Movement 341 & 342 for Batch restricted and un-restricted stocks.
    Regards
    Ravi

  • Distribution of cost

    Hi,
    Is it possible to distribute costs from one cost center to other cost centers---but specific cost element at receiver's end?
    or will it go to all cost elements under the receiving cost centers?

    Hi,
    Distribution works on the same cost elements; both for sender and receiver. That is if the sender is X, then the receiver will be also X.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Cost problem in PS

    Hi,
    Regarding cost in the projects, here i am getting two different cost in kp26 and kp06, the cost shown in kp06 is correct but in kp26 it is showing by dividing the amount with 12 months. can any one give me the reason to that ?
    Regards
    Karunakaran
    Edited by: Philip Eller on Jun 5, 2008 3:32 PM
    Edited by: Philip Eller on Jun 19, 2008 9:53 AM*

    Hi,
    KP26 - is being used to maintain the labour hour / activitiy rate in combination with work center and cost center yearly as per the decision of the management. and it is distributed according to the distributtion key maintained(0, 1, 2, 3 etc)
    KP06 - is being used for planning the activity on cost element and the same is also a combination of activity type, cost center and cost element.
    In both the cases the distribution key is used and if distribution key 1 is used the system will divide the cost according to the the period which you have maintained on the selection screen.
    Regards
    KK

  • Distribution Cycle: Cost Centre is a mandatory field for GL Acct

    hello,
    When I am executing the distribution cycle in FAGLGA35 in update mode I am getting the error (Message no. F5808) "Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account xxxxxx" as detailed below:
    Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 2050 599030
    Message no. F5808
    Diagnosis
    The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "599030" in company code "2050" linked to the field selection for posting key "40".
    System Response
    Error
    Procedure
    It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Cost Ctr". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
    As per the Field Status Group assigned to the master data of this GL Account, cost centre is an required entry. Further I am not able to change the Field status Group of this GL since this GL acct contains some balance.
    Could someone please help me on how to overcome this issue.
    Regards,
    Lavanya

    Hello Ravi,
    Thanks for your response.
    I have tried the option you have provided but user donot want to use the OKB9 option and neither she wants to change the field status group of the GL Acct by which Cost Centre can made an optional field.
    Can you please tell me if we can integrate a cost center in the distribution cycle so that the allocation can be done also for accounts for which a cost center is mandatory ? We can define a cost centre that will be used only for this allocation and that will be the same for all the accounts.
    Request your inputs on this.
    Regards,
    Lavanya

  • Shipment cost problem

    Hi sap Gurus,
    i defined scales for shipment costs (VS01) :
    1) scale basis L4 (transportation zone of departure point)
    2) scale basis L5 (transportation zone of destination point)
    3) scale basis D (gross weight)
    Then i defined a condition TYPE "ZB02" that has tridimensional scales (1-2-3) and i insert it in pricing procedure SDFC00 after FB00.
    I defined a condition record, but when i do shipment cost the condition record is found by the system (in pricing procedure i see it) but it's red.
    ---> the system calculates only condition TYPE ZB01 that has bidimensional scales (gross weight & distances).
    I think that the problem is that the system don't found the right value of transportation zone of departure & destination.
    But i checked that transportation zone was defined for customer (ship to party) & for shipping point..
    any solution?
    thanks a lot
    Alba

    Dear Alba,
    This is due to not maintaining the condition record for that "ZB02" shipment cost condition type in TK11 transaction.
    After assigning the scales to ZB02 you maintain the condition record for that condition type in TK11 transaction.
    Before going to maintain the conditionrecord you make sure that you maintained access sequence to that condition type.
    As per my advaice you no need to maintain scale basis for transaportation zones.
    You can consider these scale basis
    Gross weight
    Net weight
    Volume
    Distance
    Number of different means of transportation
    Time (travel time or wait time)
    Tariff zone (destination)
    Destination region
    If you want to maintain cost Transportation zone wise you can keep these fields in the condition table based on that you can create condition record.
    For more clearence please go through this SAP help link it will help you about Shipment cost scales and condition record maintenance.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/28/53584348be11d385ed0000e81ddea0/frameset.htm
    I hope this will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.
    Edited by: Murali Mohan.Tallapaneni on Oct 24, 2008 11:34 AM

Maybe you are looking for