Distribution rules issue

Hi,
Could anybody explain what is distribution rule and where it comes into picture. Your help is highly appreciated.
rgds
srikanth rvs

Hi
Periodic repostings, assessment, distribution, and indirect activity allocation are defined using cycles. In a cycle you define the sender-receiver relationships and the corresponding distribution rules.
During periodic repostings, assessment, distribution, and indirect activity allocation, all sender-/receiver relationships defined in a cycle are processed together iteratively. If you want to process hierarchies separately, you must define a cycle for each level of the hierarchy. You then process the cycles in succession.
Use
Distribution:
Reposting of primary costs
Sender cost centers are credited with a primary cost element
Receiver cost centers are debited with a primary cost element
Information on senders and receivers contained in the document
List of origins not maintained in the CO document
See TCodes S_ALR_87005903 - Define Distribution
Cheers
Srinivas

Similar Messages

Changing the automatic Distribution Rule from Per to Full

Hello SAPians,
I have a scenario where the Customer is maintaining the Moving Average Price (I know this is not SAP suggested, I am in the process of convincing to move from moving avg to Std) for the Semi-finished goods and finished goods.
It is Product Cost by Order scenario where Process Orders are using and the settlement rule to the Material and distribution rule is "Per" (Periodic). The main reason Customer had this Per was they would not be able to settle the Order once they settle it in full.
But due to increased issues in month end atctivities due to thie 'Per' settlement (settlement of Process Orders not settling properly in the last month due to the failure of Batch jobs and other reasons). I want to suggest them to use Distribution Rule 'Full' instead of 'Per' because of the following advantages considering the above scenario.
1. The 'Full' settlement can be settled if the Order is not in Teco or closed status any number of times as long as there is the Variance sitting on the Order.
2. The 'Full' Distribution rule will not create issue if the variance is sitting on the Order in the closed period because when you do the settlement in the next period, system will allocate the variances from the last period to the Material Receiver in the current Period(I have not yet tested this scenario) and has not been. (Yeah I know there will be issue if the Material has been moved out of inventory before the settlement happens, they have another set up to update the Material prices manually by keeping the track of cost of Material).
3. So the config change will be the Product cost by Order -> Manufacturing Order-> Define Cost-Accounting-Relevant Default Values for Order Typ --> change the Default rule from PP1 to PP2 'Process orders (periodic settlement)'
Please let me know if what I am thinking is wrong based on this sceanrio and also please give me some more insight if I am missing any points.
Thank you very much for your time!
-Harter.

Hi Balaji/Ajay,
Could you please help me in understanding the effect of Variances if I change the Order type to FULL in this scenario (Moving Average price for Finished good Material)?
I checked the configuration and the Variance is only Total Variance that is settling to FI and COPA.
Also client is more concentrated on Variance accumulated per year and not per month.
Let's say I have Order in Period 9 where the actual debits on the Order are $1000 and actual credits are $1200 where balance (variance) is $200 and suppose I missed the Period 9 settlement and I want to settle this Order in Period 10 where I had $100 variance in that Period 10
Period         Variance on Order                Status
9              $200                   missed
10              $100                   not yet
So now when I settle the Order in period 10 (with FULL as settlement type), it settles $300 instead of $100 variance. So if this is the case, if I look at the Variance data, yes the variance data is wrong but if I look at yearly perspective, it looks right but I think I am missing something here, right?
Also what happens if the Order is open more than one year and the same scenario happens, the Variance will be posted to new year which is again issue, right?
Am I in the right direction?
Please advice.
Thank you,
-Harter.

Distribution Rule in Incoming Payment of Invoice

Hello Experts,
I'm running SAP B1 8.81 PL05 and I have the following problem.
I issue an A/R Invoice + Payment and I have in the "Payment Means" a discount. The final result is an issue of two different journal entries - one for the invoice and another for the payment discount.
The problem is that I want to have a Distribution Rule associated with the Incoming Payment discount and I can't find a way to associate it - the solution of associating a distribution rule to the account is not possible because the Distribution Rule changes according to the sales employee.
Help would be very appreciated.

Hi Thomas,
From the SAP help, you can know what is the use of this rule.
Defining Distribution Rules
Use
For cost accounting, this setting is mandatory.
Use this procedure to define distribution rules to distribute amounts between different profit centers.
Prerequisites
You have defined profit centers.
Note: If you delete a distribution rule for one profit center (100%) this does not automatically delete the profit center.
You can also look up this key word to find more info. For examle, you can find SAP note 1236348 to see if it fits you.
Thanks,
Gordon

Distribution rules for Settlement Profile

Hi
I have setup a PM Orders which collect all the maintenance and running cost of vehicles (equipments). I have assigned settlement Profile "Internal Order" with settlement rule "Mandatory for release".
Now when I click settlement rule button in work order, there are two distribution rules PER and FUL both 100% and to same cost centre (which belongs to equipment).
Is this normal to have two distribution rules? will it cause any issues? where can I go to setup distribution rule to just one e.g FUL 100 (just one line), if I have to.
Thanks in Advance.

hi..
1. This is SAto creat two dis rule by default.
2. This will not creat any problem in settlement.
Basic concept is :
A) Maintenance Order settlement rule having 2 lines that is Per & Ful. Peroidic Settlement- in this settlement rule system settle whatever cost occurs upto today & suppose in future if you want to charge some more cost on the same Maint. Order then system will accept it. And when ful or Final settlement runs the rest of the cost will settle to the cost receiver.
B) You need not to delete any line whether this is PER or FUL.Its depends upon the settlement job which is done manually or schedule batch job. Suppose you has created schedule batch job for PER and FUL both. And the schedule frequency of PER is weekly and schedule frequency of FUL is monthly.
I think this will give you some light on this issue.
kkumar

Distribution rules and projects - automatic checks

Hello,
I haveve three issues/questions regarding distribution rules and projects:
- Are we able to implement an automatic control which does not allow bookings without distribution rules? The
control already exists for booking which we'll be entered manually. But for automatically generated postings
is not always in place. For example by closing a production order when the appropriate distribution rule is
missing in the BOM.
- Additional for projects: Either the distribution rule which is defined in the project master data should be
proposed automatically and/or only the defined distribution rule is allowed for any bookings. This is mainly
necessary for invoices which are registered only in SAP and not in PM (for example sales commission invoices,
transport costs etc.). There people often use distribution rules which are not suitable.
Our understanding is that once a project is set-up with a distribution rule and an entry is posted against
that item, the distribution rule can not be changed. Is this correct?
With kind regards,
Amine Z.

Closed so I can open a new thread

In CJ70 transaction , distribution rule entering option is greyed out

Hi all
In CJ70 transaction , distribution rule entering option is greyed out after our upgradation.
See in CJ70 transaction edit->preliminary settlement>enter distribution rules option will be there in menu path. till last month we able to enter this option.after our upgradation this option greyed out.i have searched for notes.but still i couldnt found any solution.
Anybody can help on this issue???
Regards
Haran.

Upon analyzing I came to know this is the program error in SAP_APPL 604 version from the note 1510625.
As per the note the correction instructions are provided in package level 09(currently our package level is 08) or we need to implement the correction instructions provided in the note.
With Thanks & Regards
Haran

Formatted Search on Distribution Rule

Experts,
I have a client where we use the Cost Centers for Sales Employees to get the P&L by cost center to work for them without any additional custom reports.
Because this client might have documents with many lines they asked to have the Distribution Rules be filled in automatically with what Sales Employee is selected on the document.
To make this easier I have used the same codes in the Sales Employee list (OSLP) and Cost Centers (OOCR). This means that George is code 1 in OSLP.SlpCode and OOCR.OcrCode.
Is there a formatted search that will auto-populate code 1 in the field for Distribution Rule in all the lines if I select Sales Employee 1 in the document?
Your help will be much appreciated,
Marli

Gordon,
Thanks, that code works.
The issue with this is that as soon as you tab out of the field, it brings up the 'Select Dist. Rule' box, even though you populated this with a code with the Formatted Search.
I have tested this with all the formatted search options of auto refresh and without and found that for all this options it brings up this box.
Thanks,
Marli

Automatic events for COST/EVENT distribution rule

Hi,
We are using 11.5.10 in our organization and we are using the following distribution rules
a) WORK/WORK
b) WORK/EVENT
c) EVENT/EVENT
d) COST/EVENT
The COST/EVENT projects generates automatic event and that too these events are passed in functional currency.
a) Is there a way we can stop these automatic generation of events?
b) If not, is there a way we can make the system to generate events in Project Currency?
Thanks
ARS

Hi
By standard functionality system will not allow you to update the distribution rule of an active project. Here are three ideas to overcome the issue. Note those are not solutions that Oracle will give you, so be sure to test them carefully before implementing on real system.
Please note the COST formula is calculating: ITD actual costs/total Approved Cost Budget X Total approved Revenue Budget. The billing extension called COST has as setup the name of the budget types for revenue and costs. It is possible to update the names of the budget types on the billing extension setup form. You might try setting a special budget types names which you designated only for that calculation. Enter budget cost and revenue values that will force the system to always get a zero result, so it will not create any new automatic event from that billing extension.
Another option is to go on and modify the SQL code of the billing extension COST (some times named COST_TO_COST). By modifying the code you prevent it from generating new events.
Another option is to update the distribution rule (Revenue Method) of the individual projects from COST to EVENT or WORK. Such update cannot be done from the front end, but you could easily do it by direct update on the database table.
Dina

Adding data to Manual Distribution Rule from DIAPI

Hi
I am searching for the object to insert the data to OMDR (manual distribution rule) using DI API. Can any one help me out.
I found many questions related to adding data to manual distribution rule using DIAPI which were not answered.
Thanks in Advance.

hi.
Just check the below posts.
object type of distribution rules
Distribution rules setup..

Profit Center & Distribution Rule - figures not shown in P&L

hi experts,
I have created a distribution rule which consists of 5 profit centers as following:
Sales1 20%
Sales2 20%
Sales3 20%
Sales4 20%
Sales5 20%
I posted a JE with amount of 2000 to one of my expense accounts with distribution rule tagged in row level.
Run:
P&L statement with profit center Sales1 is selected (expected result: expense account 400)
Result:
Empty~NOTHING. (I believe 400 should be showing in my P&L right?)
Please advice on the statement above and PLEASE do not ask me to read previous threads as I had gone through them.

Hi,
The note 843508 explains the behaviour.
Hope it helps.
Jesper

Itu00B4s possible to change the Distribution rules for a order type RM01 ??

Hi Experts:
I need to change the settlement rule which is automatic created at the moment that you create a Cost colector (class order RM01) transaction KKF6N..
but when I go into KKF6N transaction and I select the "change" option and after that I go into settlement rule screen, I can´t change the distribution rule.
I would need to change the settlement type from "PER" value to "TOT" value.. It´is possible in this kind of Cost colectors??
Thanks and regards!
Manuel

Hi,
Please note that you will not be able to change manually the settlement rule for a cost collector.
When you save, the system creates a settlement rule for the product cost collector.
The settlement rule for the product cost collector always specifies the distribution rule "100% to material" and the settlement type is always PER (periodic).
Also refer the note 388457 in which one of the paragraph it says "As of Release 4.5, a special settlement rule is generated when you create a product cost collector (with procedure 5: delivery value for product cost collector). You cannot subsequently change this settlement rule".
regards
Waman

AIAB Distribution Rule for Settlement Error, "Asset cannot settle to itself"

Hello Everyone,
I have a customer who is getting the "asset cannot settle to itself" error when trying to set up a distribution rule to settle the remaining items of a Line Item Managed AUC to multiple Assets. The Asset numbers and AUC number do NOT match. Here are the steps that have been followed.
Created an Internal Order, #2000####. (1998)
Created the AuC asset. #600####(2011)
Created Settlement Rule (Sender – Internal Order, Receiver - AUC) (2011
Settle Internal Order to AUC.
Create Assets. (2014). #900###1 - #900##99 etc.
Create Settlement Rule (Sender – AUC, Receiver – Multiple Assets) This is where my customer gets the error.
They were able to settle other items from this AuC to Assets last October. It seems very strange to me that the Internal Order was created in 1998 and the AUC was created in 2011 but as I said, this was working at least last October and possibly in March of this year.
Thanks for you help.
Rick

Hello Stacy,
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but I just had a major implementation go live on the 2nd so I've been rather busy. I opened a ticket with SAP on this and this is what was found.
Joachim from SAP Support explained that the AUC had been settled to itself last year, that is the posting the program was throwing the error on. My assumption is that we were able to settle AUC's to themselves prior to our March upgrade. This explains the problem and we have a resolution. We are transferring AUCs that this has happened with to a new AUC and then settling the new AUC as usual.
I believe SAP fixed a bug that had previously allowed AUC's to settle to themselves in one of the updates but because this AUC had a record from the past where it settled to itself the program was validating old line items and that is why it throws the error.
Ramnik's suggestion was another option but we didn't want to change the message to a warning because we didn't want anyone to settle an asset to itself.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Rick

Projects Release - Error: Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without val

Hi Experts ,
While Releasing Projects , we got error :
Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without a Validity limit.
Message No : KD059.
Diagnosis:
The settelement Profile used requires you to define a distribution rule for asset . For period 005 , 2009 , however not created a distribution rule for Asset.
We gave checked Settelement Profile , still we are not clear what settings is causes for this error ,
Please throw some light on if some one come across ...
Regards,
Sujana

check out OSS note 115618

How to add the distribution rule at AR Invoice in SAP 2007B PL10

Hi All,
       I want to add the default distribution rules of each item at marketing documents via DI API when item's warehouse changed? Now, I'm using the SAP 2007B PL 10.
       Any ideas?
Thanks and regards,
Lei

Hi,
             When add the Itemcode, default warehouse and costing codes (Profit Center) are automatically asign by SAP.
When change the warehouse for this Itemcode, the costing codes(Profit Center) are disappear. I don't want to disappear the costing codes, that's why I try to resign the default costing codes when the warehouse change.
            At SAP 2005, easily access the screen matrix in the marketing document and add the required values in each costing codes columns. But SAP 2007, all costing codes are combined in 1 col and those have the other screen.
          Do you have any idea to control the costing codes?
Thanks and regards,
Lei Nandar Myint

Distribution rules in Incoming payment and Outgoing payment

Hi,
Did anyone know the purpose of having distribution rules in all the outstanding invoices in both Incoming and Outgoing payment.
I try to attach the distribution rules to specific invoice and post incoming payment but it did not appear in the bank journal entry row.
I also try to attach profit center in AR Invoice row but after posting and do Incoming payment, the distribution rules also never show for that particular invoice.
Really wonder how the distribution rule works?
Regards
Thomas

Hi Thomas,
From the SAP help, you can know what is the use of this rule.
Defining Distribution Rules
Use
For cost accounting, this setting is mandatory.
Use this procedure to define distribution rules to distribute amounts between different profit centers.
Prerequisites
You have defined profit centers.
Note: If you delete a distribution rule for one profit center (100%) this does not automatically delete the profit center.
You can also look up this key word to find more info. For examle, you can find SAP note 1236348 to see if it fits you.
Thanks,
Gordon

Distribution rules issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for