Documents to Go Issues

If I edit a word document in Documents to Go (DTG), save it (to my media card or my BB’s internal memory), then e-mail it to myself or copy it to my PC using desktop manager, then try to open it, the file doesn’t open and word crashes.
I have: an AT&T Blackberry Curve, 8310
            OS 4.5.0.110
            Documents to Go version 1.006.051
            MS word 2002
This problem only occurs if I edit a word document. If I save an e-mail attachment to my media card, view it and then use documents to go to e-mail it back to myself and then open it using word on my computer, the document opens just fine. Why is this happening and how do I fix it?

Hi and welcome to the forums!
If I edit a word document in Documents to Go (DTG), save it (to my media card or my BB’s internal memory), then e-mail it to myself or copy it to my PC using desktop manager, then try to open it, the file doesn't’t open and word crashes.
Just to make sure, you are talking about the PC crashing, not the Blackberry, right?
What version of Outlook are you using?
You can copy files from the BB to the PC easier than desktop manager.
Simply plug in the device via USB, don't start desktop manager. Open My Computer and
The media card in the Blackberry will show up as a flash drive. Simply copy and paste!
Works for media files as well. Quick, efficient, more user friendly! Try it!
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Install BlackBerry Protect it's a free application designed to help find your lost BlackBerry smartphone, and keep the information on it secure.

Similar Messages

NO Document for Goods Issue -Kindly help me in solving the issue

Hi,
I am getting the below error while doing post goods issue.and not generated acccounting document.kindly advice me.
Material document 4900001022 does not include an accounting document
Message no. M7082
Diagnosis
The system cannot find an accounting document for the material document 4900001022.
Possible reasons for this are:
The goods movement has no relevance to accounting. Therefore, the system did not generate an accounting document for the material document.
The material document is a document that was posted before Release 2.1. Such documents must be converted so that the system can find the relevant accounting document.
The procedure for the subsequent calculation of value is not active in your system. For further information, refer to the documentation on the program for valuating goods movements: RM07MWBU.
Procedure
Choose Continue and then choose another function.
Find out when the material document was created. If the document was created prior to the Release changeover, ask your system administrator to carry out the conversion of the documents. The individual steps required for document conversion are described in the Release Notes for Release 2.1B.
Thanks
Sunitha

Dear Sunita,
Please check
T. Code: OMS2
Select your material type (from right hand side), and click: Quantity/ Value updating (frpm left hand side).
Check whether the Box: value updated is checked or not. If this is not checked the material is not valuated.
Also, check whether a relevant accounting document( In general, WL) is assigned the material document or not.
Best Regards,
Amit.
Note: The best way is to cosult your MM-Consultant.

Transfer of Freight Conditions to Billing Document - exchange rate issue

I am having an issue with my freight costs copy to customer billing document and the exchange
rate causing the values to change.
Example - SCD freight = 400 USD, but vendor is being invoiced in BRL (807.44).
The freight is passed to customer billing document, which happens to have local document currency of
EUR, but customer being invoiced in USD. However the freight is going thru some kind of exchange rate conversion, causing my original 400 USD freight
to show as 414.44 USD on the customer invoice.
I am looking for way to keep the freight from changing between SCD + Customer Billing document.
Regards
Rita

Can you share your screens from F-60 involving EUR to USD conversion?
Also, try using transaction EWCT to test conversions between currencies,
you can choose your two currencies that give you the issue, and test by
entering the initial value, seeing the converted value.

PDF document inline view Issue with Chrome

I am facing an issue with the below procedure which should fetch and display PDF document in the browser.
It displays properly on IE 9. But no luck in Chrome. Shows junk.
What am I missing? Meanwhile report BLOB column link inline download is working fine with Chrome. I use this proc to popup a new window and display PDF in it.
Any help is appreciated.
declare
v_mime VARCHAR2 (48);
v_length NUMBER;
v_file_name VARCHAR2 (2000);
lob_loc BLOB;
BEGIN
SELECT mime_type, content, file_name, DBMS_LOB.getlength (content)
INTO v_mime, lob_loc, v_file_name, v_length
FROM lease_deeds
WHERE lease_ID = :P56_LEASE_ID;
OWA_UTIL.mime_header ('application/pdf', FALSE);
HTP.p ('Content-length: ' || v_length);
OWA_UTIL.http_header_close;
WPG_DOCLOAD.download_file (lob_loc);
END;
-------------

Has anybody experienced this issue and found a solution yet?

DMS Document Validity date issue.

Hello All,
I have an issue in DMS Valid from Date & Valid to date as below.
In our Document type when our document status is set to OB i.e. obsolete, in front of the status, system is showing two dates like 22.01.2014 to 31.12.9999.
We are not using change number functionality in this document type. But still system is showing two dates. When document is in RE i.e Release status system is showing 22.01.2104... date in front of the status.
Could you please let us know why it is showing two dates in front of document status.
Thanks

Hi,
from my point of view I can inform you that these dates are validity dates for the document. Normally these dates are filled when the document is released to show which version of the document is valid or was valid in a specific period.
By using menu "Extras" >> "Versions". Here a list of all versions should be displayed and the columns "Valid From" and "Valid to" should show the validity dates.
Normally these date values are only filled when the status has set the "release" flag in transaction DC10.
Best regards,
Christoph

SD Document Output Preview Issue

Hi Respected SD Seniors
Please help on this output issue.
I am trying to print my sales documents through STD output types.
Want to issue the sales document output to the screen (Preview) or Local network printer.
Please share with me the functional & technical config steps.
For example I am using AN00 (STD Quotation Output) for printing the customized quotation document. Every thing is set and I am able to
Trigger the output successfully. But I cant see it on my screen and not able to print in my local printer.
After quotation saved, I can see the AN00 is in YELLOW. And 2 Output device are exists (LOCAL, LP01)
Please advice me the printing setup. Where should I do change to configure my print preview or connect my local network printer as a default SAP R/3. printer
Please help
Regards
Priyan

Hi Kishore
Thanks For your Quick Response.
According to the STD setup of AN00
Medium: 1
Dispatch Time: 1 (By Periodic Job)
Partner Function: SP
Storage Mode: Print Only
Condition record has been maintained and the output was triggered correctly upon saving the quotation document. (Process Status: Yellow)
Then i selected the output and changed Dispatch time to 4 (Immediate). The process status becomes RED once the document is saved.
Processing log is as follows
Line1: Object 0000560015
Line2: Output type: Quotation
Line3: Processing log for program /SMB40/RVADOR01 routine ENTRY
Line4: Processing routine ENTRY in program /SMB40/RVADOR01 does not exist
What is it meaning of Line4: Program is RVADOR01 exists in SE38
And Form /SMB40/SDQUO_A is existing in the SMARTFORMS transaction.
And to link the local print to SAP (As an output device), should i need to contact basis or any specific place that i need to setup.
Please Clarify
Regards
Priyan

Link to Document Content Type issue - links not relative

I'm using the Link to Document content type in a library in order to link to documents in other libraries. We just migrated to 2010 from WSS 3.0 (2007) and are having an issue. We view our site internally thorough the internal machine address/name
and also have users connecting remotely from an external url. In 2007, it didn't matter whether we were internal or external, all links were apparently stored as relative because the "link to document" items worked fine either way. This
was despite entering the url fully and not relative. When viewing/editing the properties of that item, it shows you the full url applicable to where you are viewing it...internal if internal, external if external.
However, after the migration to 2010, all links that existed previously are fine, but any new items created using link to document apparently no longer store them as relative so either the internal or external users get the wrong link. For example,
if I put in the link as http://servername/library/doc the external users get that same link and it doesn't work, since it should be like https://myurl/library/doc. Viewing/editing the properties of the item shows an absolute url of whatever location
the item was added. For instance if I'm connected externally and add an item, even if i only enter it as relative, it creates the link as https://myurl/library/doc and then the internal users end up having to connect via that url and that is just a pain
due to AD and certificate issues. The internally created links are obviously not accessible at all from the outside.
I've also tried storing the link as relative when creating the item but it seems to overwrite it with the absolute link.
This is causing quite an issue with us. Does anyone have any insight as to what is going on and how to fix it?
thanks!

Hmm...I thought I had the thread set to email me if there were replies and I never received an email so I thought there were no replies. I came back to this since another issue cropped up that is related and there were replies!
I cannot recall how things were set up exactly in 2007 and there's no way to look back now. I'm a novice when it comes to AAM/DNS/IIS really. Maybe you can suggest what it should look like?
We have our site which is accessed internally by http://machinename . Externally, we use https://sharepoint.mydomain.com .
In AAM we have http://machinename listed in the default zone with the same url for internal and public. We also have https://sharepoint.mydomain.com listed, in the internet zone and it also has the same url for both internal and public.
In IIS, the sharepoint site has bindings for port 80 and 443, but nothing specific to https://sharepoint.mydomain.com
DNS....I'm not sure what should be here, if anything.
We can access the site just fine externally, there are just a few instances where some links do not work correctly and point to the internal url instead of external when you are external. The original post is one time and the other, found the other
day, is a search box webpart that points to a relative url for the results page but externally it ends up going to the internal url.
I'd appreciate any guidance. Thanks!

Document Signature - Validation Issue

This is the recent help i've been trying to get on this subject over at acrobatusers.com. You can read through the issue i'm having through here, answer that was given and my response.
Summary: Basically there are multiple text fields that are set to required, customer name, email...etc. All fields must be locked after being digitally signed (through the document signature field). When default validation pattern are used (blank) it generates an error (Customer field could not be validated). After trying regular expression script, it generates an error (Customer field could not be validated). So i tried a number of different combinations of picture clauses, and from what i'm gathering you have to know exactly how many characters are going to be typed to use that sort of validation. Which in a customer name field you have know idea what their name is going to be (unless you customize a document for each individual customer (not possible)).
If anyone could help on this problem would be a lifesaver. Thank you
::COPY OF HELP QUESTION SUBMITTED::
Apparently I'm not getting the field validation examples in the Help (F1) of Livecycle. I've been struggling to get all the fields in a collection to validate properly. Once I add a Document Signature field to the document and assign the fields to a collection, it doesn't seem to like the default validation settings if I assign the fields to 'User Input: Required' So for the name field I've tried multiple validation patterns all to no avail. My question is how to write a custom validation pattern that allows for an unknown ammount of characters in a name, email..etc. I've tried A A which only validates if the user enters J D for example but John Doe does not work. I've tried other combinations but nothing works. Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you
::ANSWER SUBMITTED BY COMMUNITY EXPERT::
A:There are a couple of things you need to look at. First, is the Acrobat Picture Clause Reference. You can find it and other LiveCycle references on this site
http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/xml/index_arch.html
The other thing to look at is using a JavaScript validation script with a Regular Expression. Regular Expressions are much more flexible that the picture clause at doing validation.
Answered by Thom Parker on Fri, Jul 6, 2007
::RESPONSE FROM ME BACK::
Q:After reading through the Picture Clause Reference I'm certain there is no way to validate the customer name field without first knowing how many characters will be entered in. And I'm pretty sure there is no simple way of just making it "required" without a pattern to verify against.
The Document Signature Field acts pretty weird if the text field is 'required' and there is nothing to validate it against. Which all in all I just want to make sure it is filled out. Customer Name field (First and Last name) one text field.
So I tried the regular expression route, and added it to the 'Validate' section of the text field. Still I think the problem lies in the way the Document Signature field processes the 'required' fields.
Now I noticed that this only happens if I set the document signature field to lock the required fields after digitally signing the document. This is a mandatory feature the document needs to have, along with the document signature. And the custom stamp option is not a viable solution to this either, since in my field of work everything is questioned whether or not it was altered or forged in some manner. And Custom 'Forged' stamps would not be too difficult to recreate, so that idea is out of the window.
I'm stumped on this and any suggetions as to what route to take would be greatly appreciated. I can not release a document to the customers with validation error messages popping up even though the fields are filled out. Just wouldn't be professional, and down right annoying considering it validates about 15 fields, and everyone except the date and tim

Hey Robert,
I've been having the same issue where, once digitally signed, I end up having an issue with my mandatory fields returning an error '[mandatory field name] validate failed'. Is this the sort of errors you are getting? I'm also trying to find answers on this as I've tried a few things but it hasnt worked well. One thing I did was to change the mandatory field back to optional and coded my submit button using the if clause when the submit button is pressed to check if the this mandatory field is filled in.
if ((pgDetails.txtReqBy.rawValue != null) &&(pgDetails.txtReqBy.rawValue != ""))
event.target.submitForm({cURL:"mailto:[email address]?subject=New/Edit Supplier Detail Form&body=Please find attached the completed form.",cSubmitAs:"PDF",cCharset:"utf-8"});
else
xfa.host.messageBox("Requested by field MUST be filled. Pls enter your full name.");
This seems to work fine except for one thing. If first time around, I fill the form out leaving the mandatory field blank, it returns the message "Requested by field MUST be filled. Pls enter your full name." So now I go back and fill in the mandatory field and, without navigating to another field, I click the submit button, I get the same message "Requested by field MUST be filled. Pls enter your full name." as it has not picked up the new value of the field. Any idea if there is code to make it re-read the field?
Rgds,
Jan

Not issue permits until wcd(work clearance document) is tagged(issue is related to wcm)

Hi All,
I got a requirement from my client that user is unable to issue permits utill wcd is tagged. kindly suggest how is it possible

Greetings Peter,
I believe your requirement is that:
no Approvals can be given on the WCA, until the WCD is in Tagged status ETG at least
(and can have the relevant Approval?)
To achieve this, you must define a Cross-Document Approval Process and an Approval Hierarchy.
Create an approval such as "Tagged" in IPMD and assign it to the WA and WD objects under SPRO > Plant Maintenance and Customer Service > Work Clearance Management > Approvals > Assign Approval
Create this Approval as "Mandatory", "Copy Automatically", "Issue Automatically" in IPMD.
Under same parent node, Define Hierarchy for Approvals in such a way that the other Approvals you want to grant after Tagging only have a hierarchy level higher than "Tagged".
Under same parent node, define Cross-document Approval Process, assigning the Approval "Tagged" to WA and WD, marking it as relevant to the process and set the process direction as going down from WA.
This should allow you to meet this requirement, I think.
You could also look at the node SPRO > Plant Maintenance and Customer Service > Work Clearance Management > Approvals > Block Issuing of Approvals > Define Dependent on System Status
but I think it does not check the status cross-document, which is what you require.
N.B. I think that actually if you have access to an IDES system, looking at the WCM setup for Plant 1000 there might be very helpful to you.
More useful info for you:
Work Clearance Management (PM-WCM) - SAP Library
Approvals - Work Clearance Management (PM-WCM) - SAP Library
Configurations necessary for WCM
I hope you do find this useful and come back with any further questions or issues.

Office Documents and framset issues

I use CS3 on a pretty large school website (mac osx 10.5
users) that, unfortunately, uses frames. If you click on an Office
doc link nothing happens at all.
If you open the body frame in its own window and THEN click
on the word doc link (or browse directly to the word/excel
document), the place holder page will appear and the Edit button
becomes active. Everything from this point works as it should (edit
word doc > save > close > upload) but ONLY if word is
already open!
This is a pain for users who have no ability to problem solve
and just want to follow the instructions (that should work!)

The only thing you can try would be setting it back to factory settings, without using any backups afterwards. Set up the rest of your settings manually and see if the issue comes back.
Use iTunes to restore your iOS device to factory settings - Apple Support

Word documents embedded links issue

Hi Friends,
We have a strange issue, wherein we have some word documents in a document library in a SP 2013 site. Each document has some embedded hyperlinks pointing to some other Office documents. When we open the doc in OWA and try to click on these hyperlinks,
we get a 'blocked://....' URL with page not found error. Any idea why this is happening and where to look for?
Shonilchi..

Hi Shonilchi,
If you type the link in the Address and access it directly, does it work?
If you embed a link such as
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx , and click it, could it redirect you to the expected site successfully?
Could you test the issue on different web browsers?
Please check the ULS log and see if there is related error message.
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

STO Document Type (UB) Issue

Dear All,
I am facing a problem in the document type UB. I was copied standard document type 'UB' as "ZUB' and creat STO with the document type ZUB .I was trying to make delivery with MM route (GI in 351 and GR in 101). At the time of making GI in migo screen I got error "This order does not contain items for a stock transfer" Message no. M7153.
But at the same time when I was making the STO with standard document type "UB' it won't through any error and the document was posted properly.
So kindly suggest me the solution with regards to this issue because we can't use the standard one .
Waiting for your earliest response......
Thanks and Regards
AKS
Edited by: Arun3934 on Jun 30, 2011 3:09 PM

Hi
See SAP Note 498143 - FAQ: Stock transfer with delivery in purchasing
For delivery type usually is used the mov 641 for delivery type NL. For cross company you use the mv 643 and del.type NLCC (for cross-company, see SAP Note 109254 - Customizing stock transport order Cross Company, it's the same, change NLCC by NL and forget the billing)
Regards
Eduardo
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Jun 30, 2011 3:34 PM

CLM Contract Document Work flow ISSUE

Hi Experts,
I am facing an issue with approvers collaborator in Agreements
i.e. if am processed workflow consecutively in two contract documents against an Agreement .
at a time it is showing only one approver but it should show two approvers in collaborator of an agreement
Please help on this to resolve issue.
Thanks in advance,
Pavan.

Pavan,
You must be using process definition for workflow, so you can see only one at a time as it approvals are in sequence.
Regards,
Pankaj

Adobe Document Service Configuration Issue

Hi All,
Actually we have installed SAP ADS 7.4 ON SAP NetWeaver 7.4 JAVA STACK HUB
SYSTEM.
I did the configuration as per the SAP Standard documents. The ABAP
connection in ADS is working but ADS configuration in an ABAP environment
is not working.
While I am executing the form in SFP, I am getting the error message:
ADS:com.adobe.ProcessingException: com.adobe.Processin(200101).
While I am testing the ADS configuration in ABAP environment, I am getting the error:
ADS: com.adobe.ProcessingException:com.adobe.Processin(200101).
While I am checking the Destination service in SAP ECC I am getting theerror: SYSTEM ERROR:
ADS: com.adobe.ProcessingException:com.adobe.ProcessingException: XMLFM Exception during render:com.adobe.ProcessingException(200,101).
For the above issues I raised ticket to SAP. They suggested below steps, So I did the first three steps but I don't know how to do the 4th and 5th steps means how to copy the and extract the files.
1. Shutdown J2EE engine
2. Rename the folder
/usr/sap/<SID>/<Instance>/j2ee/os_libs/adssap
to antoher folder name (ex. adssap.old)
3. Start J2EE engine
4. Make sure XMLFormService_native.zip is copied under os_libs fold
during starting up engine (synchronize phase)
5. Also make sure XMLform.exe is extracted under
/usr/sap/<SID>/<Instance>/j2ee/os_libs/adssap/XMLFormService/bin
Please help me from where to copy the zip file mentioned in 4th step and find the attachments for error screen shots for reference.
Your help will be appreciated.
Thanks&Regards,
Ravikiran.

Hi Varun,
Actually we installed ADS in NW 7.4 and while I am doing configuration I am getting the above issues.
While I am executing the any form means (standard also) I am getting the same issues.So I think it is may be configuration issue.
I raised ticket to SAP with the below error they suggested above five steps.
ADS: com.adobe.ProcessingException: com.adobe.Processin(200101).
Thanks&Regards,
Ravikiran.

Accrual/defferal Document Clearing problem issue

Dear Frnds,
I have an strange issue with Document clearing.
Accrual/ Defferal Document ( FBS1) contains 4 line items with 2 Vendors 1 is related to Credit memo and another one is an invoice.
Accrual document normally cleared through reversal, but unfortunately one vendor invoice cleared through F110...
When iam trying to reverse remaining document that shown error"Document partially cleared" .
How to clear another line item without distrbing the cleared item (F110)??
Let me know the possibilities
Thanks
Suresh Polineni

Dear All,
Thank you for your reply.
Tax code for non taxble items are already created and assigned to co.code. The error is showing tax code but as per my analysis it is not related to tax code. It is some how posting problem except this vendor rest of all vendors there is no clearing problem.
My concern is why the document tupe "WE" i.e MIGO document is coming vendor line items.
Regards
Ranganadh

AI Document-View synchronization issue

My plugin works as following:
1. Delete a layer named "X1"
2. Add a layer "X1" and also add some art on that document
3. RedrawDocument()
4. SyncDocument from AIDocumentSuite
5. Saves changes through code
6. SyncDocument from AIDocumentSuite
7. RedrawDocument from AIDocumentSuite
Redraw at step 3 works fine. but ...redraw at step 7 loads document of state which is during "opening" the document (before step 1 of the above steps).
When I close the document and open again, I can see that the changes have been saved successfully.
A document-reload will be a work-around solution for me right now. But I don't find the reload document function either.
What might be the possible reasons for this document's Redraw failure ?
P.S. : I have used GetDocument() multiple times as a validation to check if any document is open or not. Can this be a problem, if it return a copy of the document for redraw.

1. The 2 times RedrawDocument() did not help.
2. SyncDocument() has no effect on the issue. I was just being more cautious.
3. Tried renaming the new layer, but still did not help. I tried 1 more thing, deleted the layer, saved document(through code), and redrew the document. The contents of the deleted layer were still visible.
My work-around :
1. Copy file path, color model of document.
2. Close document
3. Open Document using details copied in step 1
This helps but will surely show a big flickring effect in huge documents.

Documents to Go Issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for