Don't permit release maintenance orders after Period-End CO

Hello.
Is there a standard way in SAP to don't permit the creation or release of maintenance orders after a Period-End CO is established? We had a case the last month when an user created an order after a specific hour and it caused an incongruity in the costs because the period-end was established before.

Gabriel,
Release can be easily controlled via user-exit IWO10002 as mentioned above (see transaction SMOD).
But stopping orders being created is a little different, especially when you consider planned maintenance orders via IP30 as this may lead to inconsistencies in the maintenance plan data.
We would need to know why this caused issues with period-end-closing??
PeteA

Similar Messages

  • Revoke release of Plant maintenance order after change is done to the order

    Hi
    I need to know if thorugh some configuration I could enable the feature which revokes the release of a plant maintenance order after certain change is done to the order. Please help.
    Thanks,
    Ankbat

    hi
    you cannot revoke the status of released after changing the order. you can explore the use of user status profile
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • System status and user status don't appear in maintenance order

    I can't see the user status or the system status in the maintenance order header or equipment header or any report although when pressing the button information you can see it

    Hi Michael Nawar ,
    Please check have you define Status profile and status in T code OIBS ?  , and for object like PM order whether you have assigned it to your defined order type in T code OIOG ?
    and for equipment check in SPRO Master Data in Plant Maintenance and Customer Service >> Technical Objects >> Equipment >>Assign User Status Profile to Equipment Category.
    Riyaj

  • Xl reporter shows different result before and after Period-End Closing.

    Hi SAP experts,
    We have an issue with XL Reporter. When we ran Period-End closing and ran XL - PL Period & YTD (with the same parameters), XLR shows nil in the Actual YTD column and the monthly figures are out by a big difference (example pre-rollover it was $110K after rollover it shows negative $12M).
    This happens on 2 different clients running 2 different SAP B1 (2007A PL 42 and 8.8 PL 13) on the same XL Reporter which is possibly the default XL report that comes with the installation.
    I don't have any idea why the XLR is running 2 different figures altogether when running the same XLR using the same parameter before and after rolling the year over. The default SAP B1 P&L report stays the same before and after the rollover, I would have expect that the same would happen with the XLR.
    Please advise.
    Regards,
    Didy Arfiono

    Hi Julie,
    Thanks for the reply. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by excluding a certain transaction for closing entries as this would defeat the whole purpose of PEC which as you stated was to transfer P&L balances to retained earnings account to be carried forward.
    I've check at some guides including one from Orchestra Team (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4tUo774eXg) and so far the process that I've done is exactly what it is.
    Regards,
    Didy

  • Maintenance Order - disallowing deleting reservation after material issue

    Dear ALL,
    How to resrict deletion of reservation in maintenance order after material issue done partially / completely.
    Currently system is allowing to delete the reservation in maintenance order.
    Please guide.
    Regards,
    Prashant Salvi

    Hi,
          In Tcode O04C for Version 00000000 , Application Area CN , Msg No : 750 , mention as Error message ..
    If the above does not work then use user exit CNEX0039 : Check Whether Component can be Deleted
    regrds
    pushpa

  • Maintenance order release

    Dear Gurus;
    I am facing a problem, when I am trying to release maintenance order (of a specific order type)- system gives me following error.
    Quote;
    "You cannot use asset class 4001 for capital-investment measures
    Message no. AY106
    Diagnosis
    You have selected the asset class 4001 for automatically creating an asset under construction for a capital investment measure. Asset class 4001 cannot be used for this function.
    Procedure
    Choose an asset class that is marked for capital investment measures, or set the appropriate indicator in the master record for the asset class."
    Unquote.
    How do I fix this problem? Pls. guide.
    Points assured.
    Thanx & regards
    Hemant

    HI
         Change the asset class to Capital invest measure as per configured(ex: 9100)
    Get the asset class from  FI/CO
    Regards
    Seenu
    reward points if it useful

  • Purchase order X of Maintenance order Y still without final billing indicat

    In maintenance process, while closing the Maintenance order after MIRO and Payment, system is giving warning message as :
    "Purchase order item 4520000023 00010 of order 4000020 still without final billing indic.
    Message no. IW215
    Diagnosis
    An invoice receipt is still expected for order 4000020".
    We tried with PM consultant but setting is not there for Billing indicator.
    Any solution ?
    Regards
    Rewards if resolved...

    Hi,
    Goto respective purchage Order, Select Invoice tab in Item, put tick mark in check box of  Final invoice. Then save the purchange order.
    Preoceed further.
    Regards

  • Purchase order item of maintenance order still without final billing indic

    In maintenance process, while closing the Maintenance order after MIRO and Payment, system is giving warning message as :
    "Purchase order item 4520000023 00010 of order 4000020 still without final billing indic.
    Message no. IW215
    Diagnosis
    An invoice receipt is still expected for order 4000020".
    We tried with MM consultant but setting is not there for Billing indicator.
    Any solution ?
    Regards
    Rewards if resolved...

    Hi,
    Goto respective purchage Order, Select Invoice tab in Item, put tick mark in check box of  Final invoice. Then save the purchange order.
    Preoceed further.
    Regards

  • Period end closing

    Hi Experts
    I have one doupt some  customer or vendor bill wise balances
    Examble:.  Invoice No 1001, Dated 20-3-09, Amount = Rs.1000
                    Invoice No 1002, Dated 22-03-09, Amount = Rs.2000
    That Customer invoices i should pay 20-04-09
    After period end closing next financial year, whether the buisness partner opening balances like amount = 3000 or bill wise ?
    If the opening balance amount = 3000 how can i found the bill wise details?

    Check these links for Period End Closing Documents
    [https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001196942007E/FIN_CW50_Year_end_closing.wrf]
    [https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001209192007E/EoP_YE_2007.pdf]
    [https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700001111052006E/Year_End_Closing_V20_EN.pdf]

  • Nested Kmat; Period-end closing

    Hello,
    In PP we are using Nested Kmat in a Material variant (fert):
    Fert (material variant)
    ---Kmat as a bom sub-assembly)
    Kmat
    Halb...
    and during variance calculation for a kmat sub-order in period end closing (KKS2) I'm getting an error message:
    No suitable settlement rule found for object OR000100812538.  Message number KV206. (the explanation doesn't ring a bell for me??)
    I think I know why I'm getting this error message for a configurable material (KMAT) because there are no standards cost
    What should I do?
    Should I change the message from error to warning ?
    Do I need to create a new PP order type with repetitive setting and product cost collectors???
    What would be the better / good approach?
    Thanks!
    Luc

    We're not working with sales order stock...  All sales orders are with FERTS that are MTS.
    Kmats material are only used to reduce the amount of sub-assemblies created...
    Variance calculation has to occurs for the top level (fert) but is there a way to exclude these kmat orders to enter in the run?
    Otherwise i'm getting too many error message and analysis besome almost impossible..
    Regards!
    Luc

  • Releasing authorization for maintenance order and permit.

    Hi,experts,
    We have two different user id say "X" and Y.We want to block releasing authorization of maintenance order and permit for user id "X" and give the same to user id "Y",How we can do it in SAP?Please,give some suggestions on this.Thanks in advance.
    rgds
    rajib

    Hiii
    You can create two seperate Authorization role using PFCG transaction code. Assign it to particular users & control the authorization. Use Following procedure.
    1. Transaction code PFCG will take you on screen role creation screen.
    2. Give authorization for IW32 transaction code in that block authorization according to business transaction for BFRE. This business operation is made for order release.
    For permit there is seperate option is available for permits also.
    If you have any issue, pl. be free to ask question.
    Regards

  • Not allowing users to change qty in PM order after release

    Hi
    I am using the user exit  IW010009(customer check for save event - ZXWOCU07 to control the permit functionality against the plan cost in the PM order, which is functioning well. But I have a requirement to check , the below scenario.
    In IW31, the user creates the order with component “A” and qty 10 having value more than the permit value (say Rs.5000/,) and if he tries to release the order, the system does not allow the user to release the order. The user goes and changes the qty of the component “A” to 3 and the value is less than Rs 5000. The user successfully releases the order, but doesn’t save. He then goes to the component tab and changes the qty to 10 and save the order.
    I need some help to control the user action, of changing the qty, after release. Is there any table/function where I can find the order no and the qty entered after release of the PM order and  before saving.
    I have done some coding for WBS entry (customization) and the permit in the user exit IW010009.
    Regards
    Vidhyadharan

    Hi Jogeswara Rao
    I have pasted below the requirement from my original thread
    "I need some help to control the user action, of changing the qty, after release. Is there any table/function where I can find the order no and the qty entered after release of the PM order and  before saving."
    Regards
    Vidhyadharan

  • Error while release of production order u201CNext period is not openu201D

    Hi Experts,
    Need your opinions on this issue where my client is facing a problem while create and release a production Order on the last day of the month (Last day of period change).
    While create and release of production order for Plant xxxx, system uses to give the error; period Next (e.g. 12) is not open. Same thing if I have created the order using T. code CO01; but when I tried to release and save the order through T. code CO02 then it gave me the same error (Next period is not Open), it checks for the next period to open.
    The above scenario happens only on last day of the month. Earlier this kind of error was not there so the question is why the period check is happening while saving the production order.
    After speaking to the user, it is determined that they are facing this problem since upgrade (Since last 8 month). Hence need to check what additional check has been implemented with upgrade from R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.
    Error Message No F5201
    Appreciate your help how to dig up this issue.
    With Regards
    Anant

    Hi Guys,
    Please throw some light why on the last day of the month (Last day of period change) at the time of release the order user is getting error: Period Next (FI Next period) is not open ( message No. F5201).
    My question is why system carried out period checks at the time of release of Production Order.
    With Regards
    Anant

  • Re-release of PM order after change

    Hello Gurus,
    our PM consultant is telling me that once the maintenance order has been released it won't be triggered back for re-release if I apply changes to it. For example, I plan my work (internal hours and materials) and then release the PM order. Later I decide that I need more hours for this order. I increase the number of internal hours on this PM order and it looks like that the system does not ask me to release the order again.
    If this is the case what would you recommend to control the changes on the PM order (by changing the existing operation or adding new operations)? What approach do you implement on your projects?
    Many thanks in advance.

    hi
    you can use of permit ,create a permit with the controls of order release refuse if the permit is not issued.
    create characterisic as the name specified in the IMG ,in the characteristic addtional tab specify the table as CSEVPERMIT and the field name as PKOSTEN ,assign the characteristic to the permit and specify the values for the class as say >Rs 10000.
    then while creating the order if the plan cost is higher than Rs10000 then system will not release the order unless you have specified the permit to the order
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Release of maintenance order

    Hi,all,
    After releasing of maintenance order, my client's requirement is not to change any data like operation ,components by anyone.Is there any settings in standard SAP to do this or some user exit to prevent anyone to change the data but again changeable option  should be there to some authorised person only.please suggest .Thanks in advance.
    rgds
    rajib

    I thought PJ had a good solution with the user status, and only giving the authorization to remove the status to authorized users.
    Unfortunately, there is nothing in the business transactions to forbid changes like operation changes.
    I tried forbidding 'change' and that did nothing.
    I was surprised that even the forbid 'change documents' setting didn't prevent me changing the operation control key and the system created the change documents, but then I realized there is a different status profile for operations. So this would require assigning the user status to each operation, and even that would not prevent addition of operations.
    Of course, I usually advocate accountability over control. If anyone makes inappropriate changes, the system records who, what and when, so you can see who changed an operation after release.
    But in the end, if that's what the customer wants.......
    I think the solution would be to use user exit IWO10009 (Checks at order "save")
    Check to see if the order is released, if it is then prevent user from saving unless their user ID is in a Ztable that has a maintenance view  for administration. A sort of variation on TVARV.
    Hope it helps

Maybe you are looking for