Doubt on Syn/Asyn Bridge scenario without BPM
I followed the how to guide How To Realize a sync-async and async-sync bridge within the Adapter Framework,but issue still exists.
Its a File(QoS:BE)<=>Idoc scenario
1 File adapter sends a sync booking request to idoc(MSG type: FLIGHTBOOKING_CREATEANDRESP)
2 The idoc creates a booking in its system and then sends a async confirmation response(MSG type:
FLIGHTBOOKING_SENDRESPONSE) to the sender(sync file adapter)
In ID, there are 2 receiver determinations and 2 IF determinations for the request and the response.
<b>Sender business system: NWB_FileSystem_XML</b>
Sender CC: Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML
Parameters Tab
Qos:BE
Poll Interval(secs) : 60
Processing Mode: Delete (Successfully processed files are deleted)
Adapter-Specific Message Attributes: Select File name
Module Tab
Processing Sequence
AF_Modules/DynamicConfigurationBean 0
AF_Modules/RequestOnewayBean 1
CallSapAdapter 2
AF_Modules/WaitResponseBean 3
Module Configuration
0 key.0 write http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File FileName
0 value.0 message.correlationId
1 passThrough true
3 timeout 40000
Receiver CC: Dummy_ReceiverChannel_FileXML
Parameters Tab
Adapter-Specific Message Attributes: Select File name
Module Tab
Processing Sequence
AF_Modules/DynamicConfigurationBean 0
AF_Modules/NotifyResponseBean 1
Module Configuration
0 key.0 read http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File FileName
0 value.0 message.correlationId
1 timeout 40000
<b>Receiver business system: nwb_107</b>
Receiver CC: GeneratedReceiverChannel_Idoc
<b>Agreements</b>
Sender Agreement for NWB_FileSystem_XML uses CC: Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML
Receiver Agreement for NWB_FileSystem_XML uses CC: GeneratedReceiverChannel_Idoc
Receiver Agreement for nwb_107 uses CC: Dummy_ReceiverChannel_FileXML
The problems is:
The scenario only executes once and there are 2 XML messages in SXI_MONITOR with status Processed successfully.One of the message from idoc to file has the Acknowledgement MSG status still awaiting acknowledgement
In the runtime workbench,the status of CC:Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML is correctly configured and started.The latest Processing Details of Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML is 3/13/07 9:13:12 PM Processing started
Regards
Ming
The trace of the message from IDOC to File in SXI_MONITOR:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- <!-- Response
-->
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_INBOUND_XMB" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">User: PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Language: E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">ALE-AUDIT-IDoc-Inbound Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Inbound-Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Syntax-Check-Flag X</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Tunnel-Flag</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queueid</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_IDOC_TO_XML">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get the Metadata for port SAPNWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Convert Segment-Definitions to Types</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Make Syntax check of actual Idoc</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Set Receiver Routing-object</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Exit Function IDX_INBOUND_XMB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is expected by application !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:12Z UTC+8</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = DBD16497D8475CF186920017314ECFFB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0007</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0007</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start sender interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface FLIGHTBOOKING_SENDRESPONSE.FLIGHTBOOKING_SENDRESPONSE01*</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">no interface found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:12Z UTC+8</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:12Z UTC+8</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface Mapping http://sap.com/xi/XI/Demo/Agency FBOConfirmation_AirlineIDoc2Agency</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV" />
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_CALL_ADAPTER">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_IE_ADAPTER-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_XMB-CALL_XMS_HTTP" />
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async processing completed OK.</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:13Z UTC+8</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
</SAP:Trace>
Similar Messages
-
Hi All,
Can any one explain the following:-
In Syn-Asy bridge, we are using Reveiver Step( open Syn/Asyn), Send step(Asyn), Receiver step(Asyn), Sendstep(close syn/Asyn bridge). In this case receiver is Asynchronous system, so we are taking response from Asy system?(i.e., 3rd step from above flow). This means receiver system in called as synchronous ( send step-request, receive-step response). Please explain why we are taking response from Asyn system in syn/asyn bridge?Hi Ajay,
As you said is perfectly correct that we receive response from the Asynch system but synchronously.
As in the synch/asynch bridge, the synchronous business system sends request synchronously to the Integration Server (BPE) which in turn forwards that request asynchronously to the aynchronous business system(receiver). This receiver sends the asynch response to BPE back which is then sent back as anch response to the sender that is the synchronous business system.
Also refer to the topic Sync/Async Communication in the following link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/80243b4a66ae0ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Also see the blog:
/people/henrique.pinto/blog/2007/08/02/syncasync-scenarios-without-bpm
Regards,
Shibani
*Reward with points if helpful* -
Correlation issue in JMS adapter - SYNC/ASYNC scenario without BPM
Hi,
I am working on a SYNC/ASYNC scenario with JMS adapter without using BPM. My scenario is SOAP<>PI>JMS. I configured the interface as below:
1. SOAP Sender channel
2. JMS Receiver Channel writing to Queue A.
Module used: a. RequestOneWayBean
b. WaitResponseBean
Correlation Settings:
a. Set JMS Correlation ID to "XI Message ID"
b. Store JMS CorrelationID of request (Checked)
c. Set JMS Property to "JMS Correlation Id"
d. Value = "XI MEssage ID"
3. JMS Sender channel reading from queue B ( I am exporting the message from queue A and importing into queue B)
Module used: a. NotifyResponseBean
Correlation Settings:
a. Set XI MEssage Id to "GUID"
b. Set XI Conversation ID to "Stored JMS COrrelationID of Request"
I can see the cid in the message from queue A. But I observed thhat the header format of the message in Queue A is "MQSTR".
ISSUE:
1. While writing the message to queue A, below adapter log details(part b) concerned me:
a. Message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6' successfully processed by channel
b. Could not create acknowledgements for message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6'
I am not sure why I am receiving the message that " could not create acknowledgements"
2. While reading the message from the sender channel,I consistently get the error message as below:
a. XI message ID corresponding to JMS message with ID 'ID:414d51205341504449442e514d202020c67b954b20005602'
will be created as a new GUID with value '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'
b. Error while processing message '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'; detailed error description:
com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
Below are the blogs which I have already gone through:
1. JMS Synchronous Scenario without BPM - Correlation Settings and Transactional JMS Session
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b028f6f6-7da5-2a10-19bd-cf322cf5ae7b
2. Note: 1086303
3. Sync / Async Bridge without BPM
In the note, they mentioned something about header being "MQRFH2". BUt in our case, the header is "MSSTR". Not sure whether it makes any difference.
Please help.
Edited by: GP on Mar 9, 2010 4:24 AMHi,
detailed error description:
com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
This error would generally arose when there are multiple messages, got stuck in the outbound queue. Try to stop both the sender and receiver JMS comunication channels and clear both the inbound and outbound queues.
Once all the messages in the queue are cleraed, try posting the message again.
Regards,
Swetha. -
SOAP to IDoc scenario without BPM
Hi,
I have 2 scenario's
1) IDoc-SOAP - -response -- IDoc scenario -- (have found some links to do it without BPM)
2) SOAP -- RFC request -- RFC response -- e-mail (no links found)
how can i achive both these scenario's without BPM. Currently i have these 2 scenarios in our 7.1 version with BPM. but our requirement is to migrate this scenario into 7.4 without BPM(No PO).
please help us to achive this scenario without BPM.
Your help is highly appreciated.
thanks,
PraveenHi Kiran,
Could you please let us know the exact requirement. How do you want to send the response back to IDOC?
ASync - Sync Bridge with IDOC sender is not possible in PI 7.0.
If It is something like IDOC --> SOAP --> IDOC , And If the SOAP request is small then you can use SOAP Lookup in IDOC to IDOC Scenario.
In The mapping You can do a lookup and get the response from SOAP(Webservice) and map that to your Target IDOC.
This is one possible way for you without BPM in PI7.0.
Please let me know if you need more details about this.
Thanks
Jyothi A -
Syn-Asyn Bridge and correlation
Regarding Sync-Asyn ,I have gone thru these blogs...
Demonstrating Use of Synchronous-Asynchronous Bridge to Integrate Synchronous and Asynchronous systems using ccBPM in SAP Xi - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
I am not able to do a end to end scenario...using this ....So could any one give me a step by step guide for the syn-asyn Bridge.
And also step by step for correlation...
Please help me in this regard....
<Moderator note: Moved to more appropriate XI forum>
Edited by: Mike Pokraka on Jul 7, 2008 10:09 AMRegarding Sync-Asyn ,I have gone thru these blogs...
Demonstrating Use of Synchronous-Asynchronous Bridge to Integrate Synchronous and Asynchronous systems using ccBPM in SAP Xi - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
I am not able to do a end to end scenario...using this ....So could any one give me a step by step guide for the syn-asyn Bridge.
And also step by step for correlation...
Please help me in this regard....
<Moderator note: Moved to more appropriate XI forum>
Edited by: Mike Pokraka on Jul 7, 2008 10:09 AM -
Error handling in File - XI - SOAP scenario without BPM
Hello!
We have a File -> XI -> SOAP scenario without BPM. The problem is that if the Web Service sends back an error XI tries to reprocess the same message again and again instead of taking the next one.
We do not want set the retry interval to NULL because most error cases are temporary connection problems and then also those messages would not automatically be reprocessed any more.
We also have to use BE instead of EO, otherwise the Web Service will not return a response. But we need the response to be sure that the processing was successful. The message volume in this scenario is quite high and we do not want to use BPM only for the error handling.
I know that from SP19 some additional adapter modules are available for async - sync scenarios without BPM. I tried to configure it like described in File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19. but it did not solve the problem. Does anybody have any other ideas? Thanks.
Regards, TanjaHi Tanja,
>>>The volume is 3000 messages/day on business days and 700 messages/day during weekends but the traffic will increase in the future
I think, you should check that out. It is assumedly only 2 days work to build a scenario:
IDoc -> BP
BP <-> SOAP/HTTP
BP -> IDoc (Acknowledgement)
In the process you need a condition branch, where you decide success or not. You need 2 Interface Mappings for filling the ALEAUD.
Just send 1000 IDocs to the Test-XI and look to performance monitoring at Runtime Workbench, to find out, how many message will be processed in one hour. Assumedly 3000 and more per day should be possible. The advantage would be to reduce number of systems (no file system) and messages (better monitoring) and using the standard (better maintenance).
>>>So you are suggesting I should use HTTP adapter and then add the SOAP header manually in a mapping?
Yes, build the SOAP envelop during the mapping. Most easy is to use XSL or, if your mapping is ready, an additionsal XSL. You can put the error into the Acknowledgement to see it in ERP transaction WE02.
Filling of ALEAUD fields:
E1ADHDR/MESTYP: original message type
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/DOCNUM: original IDoc number
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATUS: 68 in case of error, 53 in case of success
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATXT: Short description for R/3 user what has happend
I ve done such a scenario several times. That works without any problems.
Regards,
Udo -
Synch-asynch scenario without bpm's?
Synch-asynch scenario without bpmu2019s can any one help me how to configure this scenario without bpms?
hi ferocious,
That is possible with standard functions and standard module beans.
Possiable1:
From pi 7.1 v , sap provided standard functions like RFC and jdbc of the conversion function group.
Possiable2:
sap provided Standard module beans those are RequestResopnceBean and OnewayResponceBean.
thanks,
bhavanisankar. -
Message Split -- File to Idoc Scenario - ( Without BPM )
I have multiple records coming to XI in a File and I have to create Multiple Idocs to R/3.
Due to Complexity of mapping I'm splitting Maaping step into 2 message Mappings.
A-->B
B-->C
In the 2nd Mapping step I'm doing message Split meaning for each Source record I'm creating multiple Idocs ( To be precise each record on the source becomes 4 idocs in the Target.
2nd Mapping step is as follows
Source 1..1
Sourcerecord 0.. Unbounded
field1 0..1
field2 0..1
filed3 0..1
Target
Message 1
Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Idoc Structure..
Message 2
Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 3
Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 4
Idoc 1.. Unbounded
So based on some criteria each record of Source will be mapped to 4 Messages ( 1 each under each Message )
Is it possible to do this without BPM?. Iam sending all these Idocs to same R/3 System.
Thanks for any help..RKHi,
See the blog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
<i>Basicly we have 2 ways of handling such scenarios:
- we can use a block step and send multiple IDOCs from our BPM
- we can also do a little trick and send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM
The first approach is a standard XI approach. It involves the use of a BPM
so the speed of this transfer many not be very good in case you'd like to send
hundreds or thousands of IDOCs in just one call.
The second approach uses a little trick that was mentioned several times
on the XI Froum by a number of XI developers but is still not very clear to the XI newbies.
It allows us to send multiple IDOCs without the use of a BPM. Most probably this will be your choice
if you'd like to use such 1:N (IDOCs) scenarios effectively.</i>
Please see the bwlow threads also..
IDOC Splitting
File To IDOC Thru XI
Multi-Mappings in BPM (XI 3.0)
Please let me know , your prob..is solcev or not..
Regards
Chilla.. -
Two mappings in one scenario without bpm
Hi,
I am using two different mappings.
Output of one mapping is acting as an input for other mapping i.e source message for second mapping.
Is it possible to do this scenario without using bpm?hi,
have a look how it works from my weblog:
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/01/xi-xml-node-into-a-string-with-graphical-mapping
you can use any mapping but you need to
be aware how to input and output structures look like:
https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/weblogs/images/34500/1_xslt_pierwszy.JPG
BTW
target structure is only checked if you use
graphical mapping
if you use abap or java mappings your target structure
will not be checked (if it's valid) as it is with
graphical mapping
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a> -
Multiple IDOC to Multiple IDOC scenario without BPM steps????
Hi
Could you please give me the solution for this ???
I want steps for sending all IDOCs at a time- ---"Multiple IDOC to Multiple IDOC scenario without using BPM".???
thanks
3nadhHello,
Refer the below, for certain details!
/people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi ALE configuration for pushing idocs from SAP to XI
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change XI: IDOC bundling - the "trick" with the occurance change
Regards,
Jilan -
IDOC to WS Synchronous Scenario Without BPM
Hi Experts,
I am dealing with Idoc to WS synchronous scenario. Can this be done without BPM??
ALEAUD can make IDOC to handle WS response??
Please suggest.
Regards,
SushamaPlease suggest since BPM involves performance issue
BPM surely has performance issue...only when there are a lot of steps/ logic implemented in it and when the processing load is too much for the XI/ PI server to handle.
The BPM design in your case will be just of following steps: Receive --> SyncSend --> AsyncSend .... excluding Transformation...and a BPM with these steps wont cause a big harm to processing of other messages.
Regards,
Abhishek. -
Usage of sync-asyn bridge problem in BPM in particular scenario
scenario is to send a Stock availability check from one suboffice to other suboffice which does not involve any R/3 activities.
I need to send SOAP request to XI, BPM receives request through synchronous interface.
BPM has to send request to DB through synchronous interface and gets response
Questions:
1) whether sync-async bridge comes into picture in BPM or not
2) i am really confused how many Data types,Message types and message interfaces i have to create.
3) what are all the message interfaces i have to create
4) abt Integration Directory activities.
Its would be appreciated if u tell step by step.
Its urgent..
Thanks & Regards.,
Pushparaju.BI have created these things as of now , but problem in interface mapping
<u>Interface Objects</u>
Data Types
1)DT_Soap_request
2)DT_Soap_response
3)DT_Jdbc_request
4)DT_Jdbc_response
corresponding message types
1)MT_Soap_request
2)MT_Soap_response
3)MT_Jdbc_request
4)MT_Jdbc_request_response
Message Interfaces
1)MI_SOAP (inbound asynchronous) MT_Soap_Response and MT_Soap_Request input message
2)MI_JDBC (outbound asynchronous) MT_Jdbc_response output message and MT_Jdbc_request input message
<u>Mapping Objects</u>
Message mappings
1) MM_Jdbc_Response_Soap_Response where MT_Jdbc_request_response and target message is MT_Soap_response
2) MM_Soap_Request_Jdbc_Request where source message is MT_Soap_request and target message is MT_Jdbc_request
Error in interface mapping is
IM_Soap_Request_Jdbc_Request has interfaces source is MI_JDBC and target is MI_SOAP
<b> No object found for message mapping in request tab</b>
can anyone help me please its urgent.
why its not detecting the message mapping in request tab
Thanks & Regards.,
Pushparaju.B. -
How to capture SOAPFault in an Async/Sync Scenario without BPM
Hello friends,
My scenario is ECC (async) to SOAP (sync) and back to ECC (async = ALEAUD). I'm using aync/sync bridge is receiver SOAP adapter.
My scenario works fine with a normal response but when I get a SOAPFault as a response I get the following error in de receiver SOAP adapter:
Message processing failed. Cause:
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.ConfigException: No sender agreement configured that matches the message's header fields (sender party: "", sender service: "NONSAP", interface: "urn:test, SII_Test_Sync", receiver party: "", receiver service: "BS_ECC")
The configuration of my receiver SOAP adapter looks like this:
Did I use parameters interfaceOnFault and interfaceNamespaceOnFault correctly?
Your help is greatly appreciated,
Kind regards,
JohnHi Nilesh,
sorry for the delay. What I found every time i used the option "DO NOT use SOAP envelope is checked" is that the envelope is removed from request and response/fault messages as well. To solve those kind of errors I developed a module called ReplaceString. What this module does is to replace a string with another one passed as parameter. What do I archive with this? Well I sometimes use this module to include some parts in the xml message before it gets in PI. For example, lets say you receive something like this:
<FaultMessage>
<standard>
<faultText>
<faultUrl>
<faultDetail>
<severity>High</severity>
<text>This is an error</text>
<url></url>
<id></id>
</faultDetail>
</standard>
</FaultMessage>
and you are expecting something like this:
<soap:Envelope
xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope"
soap:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding">
<FaultMessage>
<standard>
<faultText>
<faultUrl>
<faultDetail>
<severity>High</severity>
<text>This is an error</text>
<url></url>
<id></id>
</faultDetail>
</standard>
</FaultMessage>
</soap:Envelope>
You could use this module to replace the following strings:
<FaultMessage>
by
<soap:Envelope
xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope"
soap:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding"><FaultMessage>
And
</FaultMessage>
by
</FaultMessage></soap:Envelope>
If you find it useful, I can paste the code of the module here.
Regards! -
JDBC Sync - RFC Sync Scenario without BPM
Hi Experts,
I am using JDBC - RFC - JDBC Scnario. The concept is
JDBC is reading data from tables and send data to RFC, after updating RFC is giving response to JDBC to update its tables.
JDBC - RFC - JDBC.
Is it possible to do this scnario without using BPM?
Experts pls advise me.
Regards
BalaHello Bala,
These links are useful to you..
JDBC Sender/Receiver adapter
/people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/19/rdbms-system-integration-using-xi-30-jdbc-senderreceiver-adapter
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/jdbcTOJDBC&
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7e/5df96381ec72468a00815dd80f8b63/content.htm
Thanks,
Satya -
Hi all,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Integration Directory:
I fallowed 3 flows (wizard) for the fallowing scenario.
Business system / business service (soap) to Integration process
Integration Process to Business system (RFC)
Integration Process to Business system (File)
When I am sending request to Integration server, it is giving the error like
XIServer:TOO_MANY_RECEIVERS_CASE_BE:
IN SXMB_MONI
<SAP:Stack>Multiple receivers are not permitted in synchronous calls</SAP:Stack>
Can any body tell How to solve this problem (Configuration step by step)Hi all,
Can any body tell me the configuration steps for this weblog
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problem description: My MacBook Pro is running really slow. Applications won’t open or take up to 10 min. EtreCheck version: 2.1.5 (108) Report generated December 27, 2014 at 9:15:58 PM CST Click the [Support] links for help with non-Apple products.
-
Sharing a movie with another iPod synched with other account
I have purchased several movies in my own iTunes/OS-X account. My son just bought an iPod (with video capabilities) and wants to download and watch them on his iPod. He has his own iTunes/OS-X accounts on the same computer. I was able to sync his iPo
-
Unable to create a CVS Connection in Jdev
Hi Im sucessfull getting CVS connection, if i connect JDEV to CVS when both are on the same machine A. Im using Windows XP Professional. Im are trying to connect the Jdev in machine B to the CVS Repository on machine A. Its a multiple developer envir
-
If I get a skype number can you link it to multipl...
I'm looking at getting a skype number, but I may not be available to answer it all the time, so wondering if you can link the number to multiple accounts (from other people in our business) so other people can answer it?
-
I have a charge for $20.00 and don't know what it's from
I have a charge from iTunes for twenty dollars and I don't know what from