Doubts about BP number in SRM and SUS

Hello everyone,
I have some doubts about the BP number, especially for Vendors.
I am working with the implementation of SRM 5.0 with SUS in an extended classic scenario. We will use one server for SRM and other for SUS. We will use the self registration for vendor (in SUS). My questions are:
- Can I have the same BP number in SRM and SUS?? Or is it going to be different??
- When a vendor accesses at the site to make a self registration in SUS, the information is sent to SRM as prospect (by XI) and there the prospect is changed as vendor? After that, is it necessary to send something from SRM to SUS again? (to change the prospect to vendor)
- When is it necessary to replicate vendors from SRM to SUS??
Thanks
Ivá

Dear Ivan,
Here is answer to all your questions. Follow these steps for ROS configuration:
Pls note:
1. No need to have seperate clients for ROS and SUS. Create two clients for EBP and (SUS+ROS).
2. No need of XI to transfer new registered vendor from ROS to EBP
Steps to configure scenario:
1. Make entries in SPRO --> "Define backend system" on both clients.
    You will ahev specify logical systems of both the clients (ROS as well as EBP)
2. Create RFCs on both clients to communicate with each other
3. In ROS client create Service User for supplier registration service with roles:
    SAP_EC_BBP_CREATEUSER
    SAP_EC_BBP_CREATEVENDOR
    Grant u201CS_A.SCONu201D profile to the user.
4. Maintain service user in u201CLogon Datau201D tab of service : ros_self_reg in ROS client
5. Create Purchasing and vendor Organizational Structure in EBP client and maintain necessary
    attributes. create vendor org structure in ROS client
6. Create your ROS registration questionnaires and assign to product categories- in ROS client
7. To transfer suppliers from registration system to EBP/Bidding system, Supplier pre-screening has to be
    defined as supplier directory in SRM server - EBP client.
    Maintain your prescreen catalog in IMG --> Supplier Relationship Management u2192 SRM Server u2192
    Master Data u2192 Define External Web Services (Catalogs, Vendor Lists etc.) 
8. Maintain this catalog Id in purchasing org structure under attribure "CAT" - in EBP client
9. Modify purchaser role in EBP client:
    Open node for u201CROS_PRESCREENu201D and maintain parameter "sap-client" and ROS client number
10.Maintain organizational data in make settings for business partner
Supplier Relationship Management -> Supplier Self-Services -> Master Data -> Make Settings for the Business Partners. This information is actually getting getting stored in table BBP_MARKETP_INFO.
11. Using manage Business partner node with purchasers login (BBPMAININT), newly registsred vendors are pulled from Pre-screen catalog and BP is created in EBP client. If you you have SUS scenario, ensure to maintain "portal vendor" role here.
I hope this clarifies all your doubts.
Pls reward points for helpful answers
Regards,
Prashant

Similar Messages

  • Same business partner number for SRM and backend system

    Hello all, I am working in SRM 7.0 in a classic scenario.
    I am trying to replicate vendors from backend system to SRM, but I want that all vendors have same number in two systems, for example:
    Vendor 1000 in backend shows as 1000 in SRM
    How can I do it?
    Thanks in advance
    Rosa Rodríguez

    Hello,
    A. You need to customizing settings in SRM system
    1. Define Number ranges as External  (Same number ranges which are maintained in R3 backend sytem)
    (Tcode:BUCF / Path: IMG --> Cross-Application Components --> SAP Business Partner > Basic Settings> Number Ranges and Groupings --> Define Number Ranges)
    2.  Define Groupings and Assign Number Ranges (Path: IMG --> Cross-Application Components --> SAP Business Partner > Basic Settings> Number Ranges and Groupings --> Define Groupings and Assign Number Ranges )
    B. Before replication you need extract payment terms and UOM in SRM system & Create the Vendor root org structure (Tcode: PPOCV_BBP)
    @Experts: Please add if i miss any thing apart from this.
    Regards,
    Suneel Kumar Singan

  • Doubt about Agent Inbox with ERMS and NON-ERMS

    Hi All.
    We have configured both ERMS and NON-ERMS email receiving (to make some tests) and we verify that only the workitem generated by the NON-ERMS workflow (WS14000164) is shown in the IC Web Client Inbox. The workitem generated by the ERMS workflow (WS00200001) is shown only in the SBWP transaction. Is this right???
    We believe that our agent inbox configurations are correct, because it is working fine for NON-ERMS emails.
    There is some trick to make the generated ERMS workitens be shown in the IC Web Client Inbox?
    Thanks in advance!!!

    Hi Julio,
    You will NOT be able to get the workitems created by the standard ERMS wokflow (WS00200001) into your inbox, because SAP's assumption is that ERMS precisely replaces manual inbox assignment work by some automation (Response Management).
    Even if you add the ERMS task 207914 in transaction CRMC_IC_AUICOMM, this configuration will be made inactive by the workitem search-engine. You can observe this in method CL_CRM_IC_AUI_WI->IF_GENIL_SO_HANDLER~GET_LIST, around line 210:
    read table lt_wflows with key object = co_erms_email_task into ls_wflows.
      if ls_wflows is not initial.
        delete table lt_wflows with table key object = co_erms_email_task.
      endif.
    If you still want to see ERMS WIs in your inbox, make a copy of WF WS00200001; in copy, replace task 207914 with your own one, that you add in trx CRMC_IC_AUICOMM. Deactivate triggering event of WF WS00200001; activate triggering event of your own one. No changes in SO28 necessary.
    But you may then think about what should happen when one wants to postprocess an ERMS WI displayed in inbox; because some ERMS processing may already have taken place: incoming e-mail may already have been linked automatically to an existing service ticket. You should then support easy navigation to that ticket, and forbid e-mail is linked again manually.
    Hope this makes topic clearer
    Kind regards
    Walter

  • Doubt about the concept of HashSet and LinkedHashSet

    I read one of the SCJP 6 exam book, when talking about Set, it gives one definition:
    When using HashSet or LinkedHashSet, the objects you add to them must override hashCode(). If they don't override hashCode(), the default Object. hashCode() method will allow multiple objects that you might consider "meaningfully equal" to be added to your "no duplicates allowed" set.
    What I am getting confused is that IF the objects we add to them must override hashCode(), we must override equals() method also! Isn't it?
    Edited by: roamer on 2009?10?23? ??10:29

    jverd wrote:
    endasil wrote:
    When using HashSet or LinkedHashSet, the objects you add to them must override hashCode(). If they don't override hashCode(), the default Object. hashCode() method will allow multiple objects that you might consider "meaningfully equal" to be added to your "no duplicates allowed" set.This really is completely wrong. Duplicates being added to your set has nothing to do with not overriding hashCode, and everything to do with not overriding equals. No, if you override equals but not hashCode, you can get dupes. That is, two items that your equals method says are equal can make it into the Set.Sorry, to clarify, what I meant by that was that to avoid duplicates of meaningfully equal objects, you must override equals, and overriding hashCode is just a consequent of overriding equals (to maintain the equal objects have equal hashcodes invariant). Overriding hashCode alone will not, and cannot, prevent meaningfully equal duplicates if you don't first define meaningfully equal by overriding equals.
    In summary, it's wrong because
    1) You don't have to override hashCode() if you don't override equals (or rather, don't deviate from the default "two objects are equal if and only if they are the same object").
    2) If you have any other definition of meaningfully equal that you want enforced in a Set, you must override equals to correspond to that definition.
    3) If you override equals, you must override hashCode by the contract of hashCode and equals.
    That's why I was saying that the statement was completely wrong. It's taking a backwards approach.
    By not overriding equals, you're saying that no two separate instances can be meaningfully equal, so the default hashCode is fine. Yeah, I kind of figured for the statement to be meaningful, it is assumed that you have already overridden equals. Otherwise what's the point of even mentioning something two objects "meaningfully equal"?All this talk of "meaningfully equal" makes me think the opposite: that they haven't overridden equals, or haven't discussed it yet. Otherwise you could just say that the objects are equal, or are equal according to equals().
    I would question the authority of the source that said that.I would quesiton the source's ability to express himself clearly. :-)Yeah, maybe that's all it is. In that case, I suggest (to the OP) reading [Effective Java, Chapter 3|http://java.sun.com/developer/Books/effectivejava/Chapter3.pdf]. Best source I've seen for beginners to make sense of all this.
    Edited by: endasil on 26-Oct-2009 1:11 PM

  • Doubt about actions.xml with actions and roles

    Hi all,
    we are using a file like actions.xml for use them in Web Dynpro applications describing actions like:
    Is it possible to describe GROUPs assigning roles to them in the same XML instead of doing this using the useradmin application? We need to describe the roles in the XML because we are using around 25 ROLEs and 15 GROUPs.
    We appreciate if you can show us the complete description with an example for defining those GROUPs in the XML with all the tags and properties neccesary.
    Thanks in advance.
    Raú

    This feature is one of the hidden features SAP has for deploying stuff to NW. I'm sure there is a way for that, but its not documented, as the role extension is also not documented. I don't know why SAP is hidding this extremly useful features to normal developers. Especially for product development they are so usefull.
    Did you know, that its possible to deploy database content (not just tables!) with a special DC and an XML file in a special format? Just another example of hidden features in SAP Netweaver.

  • Doubt About the relation btwn CRM and CS

    Can anybody define the differences btwn the CRM and SAP CS Module in details..
    Wats the future of CS ??

    What is your Operation System and Database, where CRM is running on ?
    You can check in the media list in the Installation Guide
    https://websmp209.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&_SHORTKEY=00200797470000066004
    Edited by: Shaji Jacob on Apr 12, 2008 8:53 AM

  • Some doubts about Combo Drivers onto T60 and T61.

    Hello guys,
    I am own of T60 (200742u) and T61 (7663b93) ThinkPad and I would like to know if I can use combo driver (code 39T2737) that it came with my ThinkPad T60 to newer ThinkPad T61. Is it compatible?
    Thanks in advance.
    Ricardo
    ThinkPad T60 and ThinkPad R61
    Dell Vostro 1400 and HP Pavilion DV2100t
    Atom Life and HTC 710
    Nokia 5610 and SE 750i

    R6x use Ultrabay Enhanced drive which is a thicker version of the Ultrabay Slim drive in the T4x, T6x systems, they all have the same shape and connector layout, just different thickness. You can use ultrabay slim drive in R6x system, but not the other way around (the enhanced drive won't physically fit into the slim slot). If you don't use a Ultrabay slim to Enhanced drive adapter, there will be a small space left between the slim drive and the Ultrabay enhanced drive bay in the R61, while if you don't move the laptop it will be okay, otherwise the slim drive may fall out.

  • Vendor replication and exchange documents from SRM to SUS (using PI)

    Hi Gurus,
    We are implementing scenario plan driven procurement with suppllier collaboration on SRM 7.0.
    Our architecture involve:
    A server machine with SRM 7.0 (SRM server and SUS components both in this machine)
    A server machine with Netweaver PI 7.0
    A server machine with EP 7.0
    A server machine with SAP R/3 4.6C
    Now we are working on vendor replication process in order to carry out vendors from R/3 to SUS (on portal enviroment) and we made following steps:
    - Replication of vendor from R/3 to SRM by mean tx BBPGETVD: OK
    - Replication of vendor from SRM to SUS (on portal enviroment) by mean tx BBP_SP_SUPP_INI:
    In this step we put the BP (created  with tx BBPGETVD) on field "Supplier" but we obtained the Message no. BBP_XP004
    "No vendor allowed for vendor portal"
    So we want to know, in connection with mentioned architecture, the way to perform this activity in order to replicate the suppliers in SUS.
    Is possible perform activities related to exchange documents (by mean Netweaver PI) between SRM and SUS (as necessary for our implementation scenario) if these mentioned components are installed and configured on the same phisical server machine?
    What is the best recommendation about installation of SRM and SUS? A unique server machine or separated server machines?
    Is there any inconvenience or technical reason having SRM and SUS in the same server machine?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Horacio

    Hi Nikhil,
    Thanks for your soon response.
    Our process involve PR and PO manual creation in MM and then PO (with ALE message type) is routed to a supplier in SUS via XI. We could achieve that steps succsesfully.
    We don´t have in scope neither use SRM for sourcing nor PO creation (via IDOC) in MM.
    In connection with my previous explanation; Would you say that our process is MM-SUS?.
    If yes, can I follow the steps mentioned in below link described at point u201CProcess Flow Without Supplier Registrationu201D?. What´s the difference between creating and replicating bussiness partner data?.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm40/helpdata/en/c0/7a0859ee91d54aa48a69fb5d2c4089/content.htm
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Horacio

  • Link between in SRM and R3

    Hi,
          Where vendor number created in SRM get stored and how do I found link between vendor number in SRM and it's relevent vendor number in R3 ?

    Hi
    <u>Tables in R/3</u>
    LFA1
    LFB1
    LFC1
    LFM1...
    LF*1
    <u>Tables in SRM  which contain Vendor relation from R/3</u>
    VENMAP (Here Logical System of R/3 can be foung against vendor replicated in SRM using BBPGETVD trnasaction)
    BUT000 (All Business Partners created in SRM - biiders, Vendors, Contact persons, etc..)
    BUT020 (Business Partner Address data)
    BUT021 (Business Partner Address data + other details)
    Hope this will help.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Routing number of operations and reference operation  in the order

    Hi experts,
    If anyone knows about Routing number of operations and reference operation  in Maintenance order , please explain.
    is it used for maintenance order? if yes, please mention the path from which I can see or note the number generated by the system as Routing number of operations or operation task list no. or reference operation
    Regards,

    Hello,
    Routing number of operations in the order"(field-->AUFPL) of the order at table AFKO, using order number. Find the Operation counter number of the operation at table AFVC using "Routing number of operations in the order".
    From above we can fetch the Operation Level data of Order by using the Routing number of operations in the order"(field>AUFPL)  .Routing number of operations in the order>which solely identity of the Operation for your order after creation of order it is created this number.
    Regards,
    Rakesh
    Edited by: RAKESH ASHOK MANE on Sep 23, 2010 2:47 PM

  • Doubt about Scan and Update Catalog Objects That Require Updates link

    Hi,
    I have a doubt about 'Scan and Update Catalog Objects That Require Updates' link in Administration,
    how can I know how many objects that required upgrading before I click this link???
    in doc.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E28280_01/bi.1111/e10541/prescatadmin.htm#BIESG3750
    section 17.2.4 Updating Catalog Objects
    It is said 'You can confirm the need to update by viewing the metrics in Fusion Middleware Control. In the Catalog folder, find a metric called "Reads Needing Upgrade" with description "The number of objects read that required upgrading." '
    but I don't find it . my OBIEE version :11.1.1.6.2
    conld you pleae help me ??
    thank you in advance.

    That link should be there in 6 version.
    I've verified in 11g6 version doc the same is existing
    ref: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/bi.1111/e10541/prescatadmin.htm#BAJDDFFI
    BTW:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E28280_01/bi.1111/e10541/prescatadmin.htm#BIESG3750is 11g7 version
    Thanks,
    http://cool-bi.com

  • Hello! I would like to know about unlock my iphone 4? IMEI *** Serial number 87******A4T And what operator it is locked?

    Hello! I would like to know about unlock my iphone 4? IMEI **** Serial number 87******A4T And what operator it is locked?
    <Edited By Host>

    I don't know if they have email but you can start here  http://www.apple.com/support/contact/

  • Doubts about XI and RFC or IDOC

    Hello
    We have an external system that will send a file with data, with data from that file will have to make some Batch input on a number of transactions and I doubt arises in the orient
    The platform of exchange will be XI and I would like if someone could guide me in which are the advantages and disadvantages of undertaking such Batch Inputs through IDOC or through an RFC function or if there is another better way to make this process
    Thanks

    Hi Alberto.
    As far as I understand your scenario, you are fetching the data from a file and update the R3 database using a BDC session.
    In that case, my suggestion is to use a custom RFC that takes these records and creates a BDC session. This would be a better way to handle this scenario instead of using any IDOCs.
    Regards,
    Hari.

  • SRM, ROS and SUS scenario question

    Hello Experts,
    We are in the process of implementing MDM, ROS, EBP and SUS scenario in our present project. I went through the documentation. I have couple of questions.
    1. Do we need to have seperate clients for ROS and SUS. What is the best practise.
    2. Since we have SUS, once I transfer BP from ROS to EBP, check the portal vendor box, I would like to know how the registration code will be sent to supplier. Do we need to create the userid in EBP or with the receipt of registration code supplier will be able to create his first initial userid? Also how we can implement this with CUA and EP as part of landscape?
    3. Also since we have MDM, how the new BP information can be migrated or mapped in MDM and how new BP can be sent to backend system? I understand there is BP monitor to check and approve the changes, but how the new BP will be transferred? Do we need to develop new XI message for this? if Yes, from where that can be managed? from EBP or MDM?.
    I searched through help.sap.com for any documentation but no success.
    Thanks in advance
    Vijay.

    Hi,
    1.Refer the foll thread:
    Re: Supplier Registration without SUS or XI?
    2.For supplier registration,SUS is not mandatory.You need to configure ROS for this scenario.The extrenal vendors will register in ROS and then be replicated to R/3.
    You can use EBP only for Supplier registration.
    SUS,ROS and Bidding engine make up the SRM server 5.5/EBP component of SRM 5.0.
    Pls refer the foll link for the complete process:
    http://www50.sap.com/businessmaps/8F152C1AE8F1426FA3B442F905815F54.htm
    For detailed settings/config  of supplier registration,refer the foll threads:
    Re: Not able to transfer suppliers from ROS to EBP
    problems with ROS_PRESCREEN application for screen suppliers and manage bp
    Re: SUPPLIER DIRECTORY (ROS) link not appearing in EBP in "SCREEN SUPPLIERS"
    Supplier Directory
    Re: Supplier Self registration
    Re: SRM Supplier registration config
    Re: External Web Service setting for Supplier Registration ROS to EBP
    Re: Problems when transferring supplier from ROS to EBP...
    3.Not worked on MDM so cant help you on this.
    BR,
    Disha.
    Do  reward points for useful answer

  • Archiving SRM EBP and SUS Data at End of Contract Period

    Hi Team,
    We are implementation SRM EBP and SUS solution to one of our Customer.
    Below is our Landscape Details
    SRM 7.01 SP09
    Portal 7.3
    SP08
    MDM 7.1 SP07
    We have deployed all the application in our Data Center and customer have signed a 5 contract to use the solution. At the end
    of the 5 years, if the customer wants to move to other solution, they the want the master and all SRM related datas to be archived and copied in
    a media, where they can retain for 7 years.
    Please confirm how this can be achived the SRM solution
    Regards
    Ponnusamy

    Hi Experts,
    Can you please help.
    At the end of contract, period, if customer wants to migrate data from SAP SRM to some other SRM system, how it can be achieved.
    Regards
    Ponnusamy

Maybe you are looking for