Doubts reg: payement term

Hi all,
I have a requirement to create a payment term 30 Days, 3 % Cash Discount .
This means if payement is done with in 30 days 3% discount will be given.
But there is no specification of net days here. SO does that mean that net is 31 days?
Also, for this, while creating payment term in OBB8, should I maitain in the Payment term tab,
Trem1. Percentage 3% NO. Of days 30
Is there any thing else that needs to be maintained?

Hi ,
In OBB8 the payment terms tab decides the actual payment term conditions .
In the percentage you have to maintain the discount percentage and in the No. of days you will have to enter the number of days from the baseline date thay you want to provide discount upto.
Regards ,
Dewang T

Similar Messages

Payement Terms

Hello,
We have a requirement tp print payement terms details in PO output.
e.g. 14 days 2%, 30 net
Within 14 days 2 % cash discount
Within 30 days Due net
I want to print these details as it is in printout. I have checked various possible tables(t052 but couldnt able to fetch the data as it is. Please guide how can this be achived.
Regards,
SP

>
Jeyakanthan A wrote:
> We also have similar reqt in p.o print
> I got below answer in ABAP forum,
>
It creates the texts for the payment terms in the input table I_T052 using the text symbols in program SAPLFHL2
Tell your abaper where you want the text displayed in PO print, and he will get it catered through the above details.

Payement terms - Credit memo

Hi experts
I have a issue with my client
they are posting the Credit memo with payement terms ( 30 days) but where as in the accounting document the net due date comes the creation date ( posting date ) current date
even in Payement terms they have given the document date and every thing looks okay
where as for sales , the payement terms is 60 days and the net due date comes after 60 days
pls help

Hi,
when you issue the credit memo you are paying the customer or may be returning his payment or giving credit for returns
The payment terms in the invoices are mostly for the receivables
I think it's causing the prob just because it's the credit memo & not a standard invoice
Thanks
Prashant

Doubt Reg Generic Delta "Safety Interval" Setting

Hi Experts,
I have a doubt regarding Setting "Safety Interval Upper Limit" and Lower limit in RSO2 for generic delta.
What does this setting imply?
If I do setting for calender day say both 1 then wht will be difference between delta before setting amd after setting?
Plz explain in terms other tham help provided...
Points will be awarded to say thanks..
Thanks in advance,
Sorabh

Hi Sorabh,
Here some SAP informations:
Safety Interval Upper Limit of Delta Selection
This field is used by DataSources that determine their delta generically using a repetitively-increasing field in the extract structure. The field contains the discrepancy between the current maximum when the delta or delta init extraction took place and the data that has actually been read. Leaving the value blank increases the risk that the system could not extract records arising during extraction. Example: A time stamp is used to determine the delta. The time stamp that was last read is 12:00:00. The next delta extraction begins at 12:30:00. In this case, the selection interval is 12:00:00 to 12:30:00. At the end of extraction, the pointer is set to 12:30:00. A record - for example, a document- is created at 12:25 but not saved until 12:35. It is not contained in the extracted data but, because of its time stamp, is not extracted the next time either.
For this reason, the safety margin between read and transferred data must always be larger than the maximum length of time that it takes to create a record for this DataSource (with a time stamp delta), or it must display an interval that is sufficiently large (for determining delta using a serial number).
Safety Interval Lower Limit
This field contains the value taken from the highest value of the previous delta extraction to determine the lowest value of the time stamp for the next delta extraction. For example: A time stamp is used to determine a delta. The extracted data is master data: The system only transfers after-images that overwrite the status in the BW. Therefore, a record can be extracted into the BW for such data without any problems.
Taking this into account, the current time stamp can always be used as the upper limit when extracting: The lower limit of the next extraction is not seamlessly joined to the upper limit of the last extraction. Instead, its value is the same as this upper limit minus a safety margin. This safety margin needs to be big enough to contain all values in the extraction which already had a time stamp when the last extraction was carried out but which were not read. Not surprisingly, records can be transferred twice. However, for the reasons above, this is unavoidable.
Extracted Data Delta Type
The system uses the delta type to determine how extracted data is to be interpreted in BW, and into which data targets it can be posted.
A distinction is made between the following:
1. Additive delta
The key figures for extracted data are added up in BW. DataSources with this delta type can supply data to ODS objects and InfoCubes.
2. New status for changed records
Each record to be loaded delivers the new status for the key figures and characteristics. DataSources with this delta type can write to ODS objects or master data tables.
Check also examples in "How to... Create Generic Delta" under www.service.sap.com/bi.
Ciao.
Riccardo.

Sales order.. basic doubt about payment terms

hello,
I am trying to create a sales order with 2 materials,
I am getting 2 different Payments Terms, why I am getting so, I belive terms of payments are copied from Customer Master data. My SP, SH, BP, Payer are all same.
please let me know, what else should I check.
thank you
madhu.

Hi Roberto,
Thanks for quick reply, can you kindly let me know in more details. where should I look for these condition recordes. If I see the pricing condition types in pricing anlysis, Can I see them ..pls let me know
thank you. awarded points.
thank you once again.

Doubt reg the Info Cubes

Hello, Experts.
I few Doubts Regading, Cubes.
We have a cube which is getting Loaded from APO Every day. Now business has asked us to Chage the Data Source for Few Key fig and they want
few more char and they have removed few Char which are not really used for this Key fig.
In this case shall i use the same cube and create a new Data Source ,Info source,Update Rule /or/ go and Create a New cube?
they want few Key fig from the Old Data Source and Few from new Data Source.
and few Char are same in both the data Source. like Division, Sales Org, Customer, new char are Flavours, region, .... which are not in the existing cube.
Please Suggest me.
Thanks
Sharp

Sharp,
The general rule of thumb is if it is similar kind of data, and you are just adding few additional chars/key figures, it is better to just change the existing cube. One the other hand, if the data from the new data source is different, it is better to create a new cube. For example, if you have Plan data in a cube at the WBS level and the requirement is to now load the Plan data for the activity/actiity element, I would just add the activity/element to the existing cube. Instead, the requirement is to now add the Actual data, I would create a new cube and report off of the multi-provider.
Also, you mentioned that the data from the new source will not have some of the existing charactersitics populated, in that case your cube will be sparsely populated for the new data source.
Think about the volume too. If the volume from the new source is big it is better to create a new cube. This will be better in terms of maintenance.. For some reason, if you have to drop just the new data and reload and if they are in separate cubes, it is a lot easier. Otherwise, it puts a restriction on compression, etc.
I would say, consider several different factors like, data relevancy, how many new char/key figures, data volume, load restrictions, reporting requirement before you decide.
Regards,
Abdul Kaleem

How to clear incoming payement for the invoices which has been posted through payement terms

Hi All ,
Could any one help me on the below problem which i am facing from last 1 month.
Here is my activity which i have done.
1) i posted one invoice in f-22 with the payment term 002 which is predefined by SAP.
01 - CUSTOMER A/C
50 - SALES A/C with the amount 3000
2) Now i want to clear incoming payment through F-28
entry will come for Bank a/c and customer a/c
now if i want to clear the amount of 3000 and i m getting the error message'correct the marked line item'
please find the screenshot below for the same and help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Ashutosh

Hi Ashutosh,
Great - now you know the required field (Asset retirement) that is causing the error. (It is obviously not the Text field - otherwise it would be marked as such on the screenshot.)
The second question is - does it make sense to push asset retirement here? Normally, you do it on an account for a revenue from asset sale, not on cash in transit.
If yes, then after ticking the checkbox and pushing Enter, you will get a popup box, asking you to enter a number of fixed asset that you want to retire, plus perhaps some other data (sorry, I do not have it in front of me). When saving the document, the system will then automatically add lines for setting to zero (or reducing) asset value and accummulated depreciation against gain/loss from sale (or revenue vs cost), as per your AA configuration. Is this what you want?
If not, then check if you have the correct field status assigned to the account (in trans. FS03, tab "Create / bank / interest").
Good luck!

Payement terms check in advance payment

System shall not allow me advance payment against PO if payment term (payment due after 30days wrt baseline date) is maintained in PO.
Is there any check we can maintain in this regard.
Thanks
Shruti

Hi Shruti,
While running automatic payment programme you can give next payment date after 30 days so that system will pick your advance payment as well.
Thanks,
Haribabu Bodapudi

Payement terms Baseline date

Hi All,
I had a billing document created on 01.04.09 and I am releasing the same to accounts on 05.04.09. Now my billing date will be 01.04.09 and payment terms C010 will start the calculation of the given 10 days from 01.04.09. But I need the start date should be the release date i.e., 05.04.09. For this I have changed all the given options in OBB8 " Default for baseline date ". But still system is taking the baseline as 01.04.09 only.
So can anyone suggest me how to change the baseline date as per my requirement.
Regards
Ratna

The payment term config only takes the baseline date from the Billing date even if u put the entry date or anything else there.... all those settings are for the FI documents posted manually......
whenever u use VF01 the baseline date is the billing date....
Now how to change it: if u have a sales order then there is a field called Value date.... it passes the value from SO to billing..... so if u put the value date as 05.01.2009 then the baseline date will capture the value date... so whenever the value date is given then syytem picks up that date instead of the billing date..... This field is not editable in the Billing document..........
Also u can change the baseline date manually after FI doc has been posted but it will only affect the AR aging not the actual invoice...

Reg.payment terms

Hi
[1].    Customer credit period =30 days
Payment should be made by 2 installments
1st installment at the time of delivery i.e 30% (10 days from posting period)
2nd installment after 20 days i.e remaining amount.(70%)
i entered values in installment window under Admin----setup--Business partner----payment terms
   installment =1
credit method =First installment
update tax proportionately
month =0
days = 10
percentage=30%
when am trying to add this ,a message showing
the installment rate must be 100% (message 3540-3)
and how to create 2nd installment
how do i configure the above scenario.
regards
raj
Edited by: raj kumar on Apr 6, 2009 12:32 PM
Edited by: raj kumar on Apr 6, 2009 1:12 PM

Hi
Thank u
i understood second option (apply tax proportionately)
but in first option(apply tax in first installment) when i included invoice tax amount to first installment,
For eg
total invoice amount =7904
tax amount= 304
1st installment=30%
2nd installment =70%
when i use second option i.e (apply tax proportionately)
30%   =2371.20
70%   =5532.80 this is ok but
in first case (apply tax in first installment) should be
30% = 2371.20 +304 (tax amt)=2675.20 but
          getting 2584 (how it calculated)

Re: Payement terms change

Hi all,
            I have a requirement like I need to display the payment term change report specific to the vendor for each month,
            the changes may be at company code level as well as purchase org level.All the changes are maintained at CDHDR and
           CDPOS but my question is in my selection screen the fields are Vendor no porg ccode, How to fetch the changes from
          CDHDR and CDPOS ( I want changes in payment term field only ) not all the changes specific to vendor at ccode level as
         well as porg level.
Regards,
Sashi.

Are you sure that payment term can be changed at purchasing org. level ? I am asking this because, in XK02 transaction payment term is in payment transactions at Company Code data.
If you want to track changes done to the payment term at company code level use following logic.
Step 1:
Select from CDHDR
Selection criteria: OBJECTCLAS = 'KRED'
                             OBJECTID = Vendor number
Field to fetch: CHANGENR
Step 2:
Select from CDPOS
Selection Criteria: Selection criteria: OBJECTCLAS = 'KRED'
                             OBJECTID = Vendor number
                            CHANGENR = CHANGENR fetched in step 1
                            TABNAME = 'LFB1'
                             FNAME = 'ZTERM'
                             CHNGIND =' U'

Different Payement terms & Incoterms

Hi friends
I have 2 orders with respective deliveries. Payment terms and Incoterms are different from 1st order to 2nd order. Now can we get SAME INVOICE NUMBER for both the deliveries??
Urgent pleasee.
Regards
Ramesh

Hi,
You cannot get one invoice for both the deliveries as the "payment terms" & "incoterms" are different for both the sales orders. Thus the header data is differing in both sales orders.
In transaction code "VTFL" - copy control between delivery doc. to billing doc.
Setings at header level:
Copying requirements - "003"
Determ. Export data - "---"
Assignment number - "A"
Reference number - "E"
Copy item number - "ticked"
Settings at item level:
Copying requirements - "004"
Data VBRK/VBRP - "007"
Billing qty - "B"
Pos./Neg. Qty - "+"
Pricing type - "G"
Note: You will have to define a new routine in "VOFM" which you will have to define the new split criterias and assign in the copy controls.
Reward points if solution helps.
Regards,
Allabaqsh G. Patil

Linking Payement terms with Discount

DEAR SD GURUS n EXPERTS,
We provide 10% Discount to the customer on advance cash payment.
1. Currently user enter it manually in the conditions. It print on billing like that:
     Material:           90,000
     Doscount:        10,000
Total:                     1,00,000
After that user generate the credit not for the same.
Our requirement is that:
User don't want any manual intervention. So, Is there any way to link the Discount with payment terms and it should calculate or consider automatically in conditions (on Material level) and print on the Billing.
Credit note should generate automatically for that billing.
Please help. Early response will be highly appreciated.
With thanks,
DSC

HI,
SAP ECC version, you need to define one condition type in the pricing procedure.   You need to give the payment term as one of the keycombination and define the condiiton records.
So, when there is there is particular payment term in the sales order, condition type will get determined and it will be applied.
Regards,
Rajesh

Reg Long term disability

My friends in my scenario employee who goes for long term disability
during his first period(three month) he should be deducted 75% of pay
during his second period(three month) he should be deducted 50% of pay
remaining period 10% of pay.
For me for all the month deduction of 75% only happening. Remaining rules are not working.
I configured everything related to that. Still it s not working out.
Please guide me.

In IMG USA -> Abscences ->
->Describe Absence Valuation Rules
                 Here i gave the text for the rule.
->Assign absences to valuation classes
                 In this I assigned the rule no for the PSG and abscenc type 202
Short/Long-Term Disability (STD/LTD) Plans
    Establish and define short/long-term disability plans
                In this i Created the plan intervals as I mentioned earlier
Prepare payroll for processing pay related to STD/LTD plans
->Check split payment valuation rules for STD/LTD plans
               Here for those rule which i created - assigned the wage type M864.
->Check absence breakdown for STD/LTD plans
               I linked all the rules.

Doubts reg Delta

GM All,
I've seen several posts regarding delta's in the forum but coulnt get a clear picture..my doubt is:
With respect to V3:
1.Once initialization is done does delts gets into delta queue automatically or does we need to run an IP?
2.when we run an IP for delta does the data be fetched from delta queue i.e RSA7 in R/3?
3.Is there any queued delta which comesinto picture before deltaqueue(RSA7) if so what's the use?
Plzzzzz clarify..
Madhavi

Hi Madhavi,
1Ans:
When ever you done the initial Load then delta will enable automatically at BW side and also you can check at RSA7. then we can do delta loads
2Ans:
Yes, delta record come from RSA7
3Ans:
Yes,
in LO Cockpit here delta methods are 3 types
1 Direct delta : delta records directly comes into RSA7.
2 serialized delta : delta records comes into SM13 and than thru V3 Job, records come into RSA7.
3 queued delta : Delta records comes into LBWQ than into RSA7 thru V3 Job
I think u may get an idea about your questions.
Let me know if you have any doubts.
Thanks,
Raju
Edited by: Raju Eegu on May 15, 2008 8:00 AM
Edited by: Raju Eegu on May 15, 2008 8:02 AM
Edited by: Raju Eegu on May 15, 2008 8:18 AM

Doubts reg: payement term

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for