Down payment document differs from print layout since SBO 2007A PL45

Since upgrade from PL42 to PL45, we have ceveral problems.
- Print Layout wrong:
1. We have a sales order with 7 positions, 2 of these 7 positions are already delivered and paid.
Based on the sales order, we post a down payment invoice that has the correct 5 positions from the sales order. When selecting print preview (it doesn't matter, if it is a user defined print layout or a SAP standard layout), we get all the 7 positions that are in the sales order.
2. Also down payment invoice: We have one position with 3 items, the document shows the unit price correct and also the price for the position (price per unit x3) correct. The print layout only shows unit prices.
3. sales order has another currency rate then the down payment and the following invoice, as they will not be posted the same date. The documents show everything correct, but the print layout only shows the currency rate from the sales order (also in the following documents like DP invoice and final invoice).
- a lot of dump files....
Does somebody knows a solution for these problems or does somebody knows, if they will be solved in the PL46 or 47?
Thanks  a lot.
Katrin

Hi katrin,
In case you are recieving Dump files with a system standard layout,kindly log a support ticket with
SAP support.Please attach the dump files and describe the scenario to reproduce the issue.
Abhinav Banerjee
SAP Business One Forums Team

Similar Messages

  • Payment on account print layout in SBO 2007A

    I want to display the account code and GL account on incoming & outgoing payment for Vendor AND on account in the PLD, when selected, but RCT4 does not pull through to PLD.
    Is their another solution to display Vendor Code and/or GL code, depending on the type of payment ?

    Hi......
    Link the field of Account code to OACT and display the Account name.
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • Down payment document reversal with TDS deduction.

    Hi Experts,
    One vendor down payment has been done through F-48 and TDS was also deducted. The TDS deducted has been paid to the government. TDS line item is cleared. now the vendor returned the cheque. I want to reverse this down payment document but since TDS has been remitted it is not allowing to reverse. please suggest.
    Sonali.

    Question not answered, but closing it so that I can post other questions.

  • Vendor/Customer Down Payment document parking

    Hi sirs,
    I want to park the Vendor down payment and customer down payment document with one user ID and afterwards I want to post the document with other user ID.  Is it possible in SAP. 
    What type of documents can be parked and posted in SAP through another user ID and with the same user ID.
    BSR

    Hi BSR,
    Down payment document can be park but  after parking that document will automatically flow to the respective authorized person for getting approval  and posting. As parking doc follow a predefined workflow path.
    In that workflow path if you have mention next approver is the same user id then u can but practically it is not correct(why a person will Park with same user id and post it with the same user id  itu2019s a wasting  of time ) but logically u can  make it possible by inserting same user id in workflow as approver.
    Thanks n Regards
    Prakash
    FI certified , AICWA

  • How to get payment document number from paid column in monthly invoice

    Dear experts
    I use SBO japan version and i need to know how to get payment document number from paid column in monthly invoice ?
    in table MIN1, only contain invoice and credit note document number, there is no payment document number
    thank you for your help
    Best Regards
    JeiMing

    Dear Gordon
    Yeah, you are right, i can use field MIentry in RCT2
    thank you
    Best regards
    jeiming

  • Down payment document change

    HI,
        We have created a Internal order 55555 and Purchase order xxxxxxxxxx.This IO is assigned in the account assignment while creating PO.
    After this we made a down payment request and this down payment is cleared by a payment document. But later we came to know that PO is not assigned while creating down payment request. So is there any way that we can add the Purchase order number to the down payment document. In the Change mode can we add the PO Details
    Also the payment is already made to the Vendor. So please sugget how we can link the IO to this Purchase order.
    Regards....

    Anyone please update on this.....

  • Reversal of down payment document

    Hi
    i am trying to reverse a down payment document (posted through F-48) where cheque is involved.  when i am doing through FB08 it is giving a message cleared items exists.  When i try with FCH8 the system is giving message it is not fully cleared document.  So can anyone tell me how to reverse the downpayment document when cheque is also involved.
    thanks

    Hi,
    If the down payment is cleared vide F-54 then reset and reverse the document vide FBRA and then reverse the corresponding down payment document (posted through F-48) vide FCH8.
    I do hope this will fix your issue.
    With best wishes
    Monoj

  • WBS field not appearing in the down payment document posted via FBA7/F-48

    i have created several down payment docs wrt PO, acct assignment WBS, but none seems to populate the WBSE field in the payment document, when using FBA7/F-48. All the down payment documents appear in the PO (Purchase order history) but only those which have been paid through F110 populates WBSE and the ones paid through FBA7 does not populate WBSE field. We are clear that the down payment documents are posted rightly w.r.t PO but its just that they dont get linked to the WBSE when FBA7 is used and gets linked when F110 is used. Please suggest if am missing any config setting. i already raised this in PS Forum but it now seems more of FI.
    /thread/1791429 [original link is broken]

    Hi,
    please check whether the feild status of your document types KZ, KA and KG are having the status for WBS Elements as optional or hidded
    Best Regards,
    Ravi Reddy

  • Down payments to different vendors through app (f110)

    hi frineds how can i make down payments to different vendors through APP in (f110),  where should i configure this settings ? pls help me with t.codes and paths..

    SETTINGS:
    Usually "F" is used for DPR (DOWN PAYMENT REQUEST) and "A" is used for DP (DOWN PAYMENT).
    "F" has as target indicator "A" by OBYR transaction.
    POSTINGS:
    By F-47 You post a DPR.
    During the DPR posting, you have to insert the Target indicator; usually A and the DPR will report F as special indicator. ( Bcoz DPR(F) will target DP, that is A)
    Into FBZP --> All company codes --> Sp. G/L transactions to be paid --> if you insert F, the System will take the DPR previously posted during the F110.
    But if you posted some DPs, these DPs will not take in consideration by F110.
    ALL THE BEST

  • Down payment document

    hi,
       can u please tel me how to see the down payment document?

    Hi Expert,
    Just Go to T-Code: S_ALR_87013611 - Cost Centers: Actual/Plan/Variance - Here provide the useful parameters and check the entry.
    Regards,
    GK
    SAP

  • How to find Down Payment document with vendor details from AW01N

    Hi,
    I am trying to do partial settlement in KO88, for AUC to Fixed Asset. While running the T Code I am getting the following error message.
    Down payment to recipient 100620 0 area 01 amount   13,181,454.04 not cleared
    Message no. AW605
    I went through many threads for this issue and I am trying to clear the downpayment in F-54. But I am not able to find the Vendor details to whom the Down Payment was done, neither the dosument number against which the downpayment has to be cleared.
    I tried finding these details in AW01N. I could find the amount reflecting in the Planned and Posted tab in the first section.
    But was not succesful to find the documents and vendor details from there.
    In the second section in Planned Tab, I am finding some transactions. There I am finding Down Payment mentioned. When I double click on Down Payment in AW01N, I am taken to the document which is a clearing of Down Payment. You can see the below entry.
    81008100
    Fixed Assets Interim
    1,049,371.84-
    30300100
    000000900000 0000
    2,538,367.44
    30520000
    Clg Cap D-Pmts-T-Ast
    2,538,367.44-
    30300100
    000000900000 0000
    1,049,371.84
    30300100
    000000900000 0000
    101,948.00-
    30520000
    Clg Cap D-Pmts-T-Ast
    101,948.00
    Now, how do I know which documents to be cleared to which Invoice and the vendor details.
    Kindly help me with this issue.

    Hi,
    Thanks. Kindly suggest now, how to find the documents and vendor details from there.
    When I double click on any Down Payment in AW01N, I am taken to the document which is a clearing of Down Payment. You can see the below entry.
    81008100
    Fixed Assets Interim
    1,049,371.84-
    30300100
    000000900000 0000
    2,538,367.44
    30520000
    Clg Cap D-Pmts-T-Ast
    2,538,367.44-
    30300100
    000000900000 0000
    1,049,371.84
    30300100
    000000900000 0000
    101,948.00-
    30520000
    Clg Cap D-Pmts-T-Ast
    101,948.00
    Now, I want to clear the down payments in F-54, but how do I know which documents needs to be cleared to which Invoice and the vendor details. Since I am getting error while executing KO88 AUC transfer to Assets.
    Down payment to recipient 100620 0 area 01 amount   12,832,161.41 not cleared
    Message no. AW605
    Diagnosis
    All downpayments were not cleared for the asset under construction for the receiver 100620 0 in area 01. An amount of   12,832,161.41 was not cleared, or too much was cleared.
    You can only completely transfer an asset under construction if you reverse the down payments in the current fiscal year beforehand.
    Procedure
    Clear the downpayments that you want to settle to receiver 100620 0.
    Check screen shot.

  • A/R Invoice that link with Down Payment document have reversed GST from DP

    Hi All,
    I am buzzle on why SAP has changed their function for down payment in 8.81 version. For example, if SO amount is $1000 and GST is $70, but company request their customer to pay $500 as deposit (add GST $35). In SAP 8.81 version, the double entries will be as below:
    Down Payment Invoice
    Dr Customer                        $535
    Cr GST                                         $  35
    Cr Down Payment Clearing Acct $500
    Incoming Payment
    Dr Bank                              $535
    Cr Customer                               $535
    Invoice (final)
    Dr Customer                                 $535
    Dr Down Payment Clearing Acct $500
    Cr GST                                                 $70
    Dr GST                                          $35
    Cr Sales                                              $1000
    In the final invoice, why there is a reversal of GST amount from Down Payment invoice? In previous version, final invoice will only calculate the GST amount base on balance amount instead of currently credit with full sales amount's gst and reverse previously posted gst amount from down payment invoice.
    This will cause problem if down payment invoice and final invoice are few months apart. Company will have paid the down payment invoice's gst amount. Anyone knows the logic for current changes? Appreciate if anyone can help, thanks.

    Dear Expert
    Let me clarify my client's scenario more to see whether you could give advise.
    My client's business is project based and the invoicing flow is as below:
    Phase 1 -
    Invoicing  30%
    Phase 2 -
    Invoicing  30%
    Phase 3 -
    Invoicing  40%
                                                   Total 100%
    However, invoice for phase 2 maybe issued before invoice for phase 1 is paid and so do invoice for phase 3.
    There is also possibility that invoice for phase 1 is paid while invoice for phase 2 is not at the time when whole project is completed. Invoice for phase 3 therefore has to be issued before invoice for phase 2 is paid.
    The installments for A/R is not applicable in this case since sales would be realized at the time when the A/R invoice is issued.
    My client would have to realize the sales upon completion of project phase. A/R down payment invoice almost satisfy this scenario however, no A/R invoice of the balance with reference to the down payment invoices can be issued before the down payment invoices are settled.
    Can anything be done to overcome this limitation?
    Regards
    Elton

  • Post down payment with different currency from request with F-48

    Hi all,
    I have a problem when I try to post a vendor down payment with the transaction F-48. The down payment request currency is EUR but I want to do the payment with USD. If I put in the field Currency/Rate USD the transaction F-48 show the message u201CNo suitable down payment request existu201D, but if I put the currency EUR the down payment request appears but I just can post it with EUR.
    Is it possible to select the down payment request in EUR and post it with USD using the F-48 transaction?
    Best regards,
    Miguel

    Hello,
    I have the same challange like Miguel in the original thread:
    "Is it possible to select the down payment request in EUR and post it with USD using the F-48 transaction?"
    Please let me know how to manage this case in SAP.
    Kind regards
    Zarko

  • Portal 902. Uploaded document differs from downloaded document.

    We are currently trying to set-up a portlet, which would include items (documents, images etc.). The problem we faced in that process is related to portal's storing process. We uploaded a pdf-file (Java API Guide from otn.oracle.com) as a simple file. Then, attempting to open the same file from portal, we got different errors: "the file is damaged and could not be repaired", "error reading xref entry" etc. Since these errors refer to acrobat reader and browser conflict we turned that "open in browser" option off in Adobe Acrobat. After this, the situation did not improve. Still, it was possible to download the document from the portal as a file. We downloaded the file and made a binary comparison. The result was quite intereseting since the size of both (uploaded to portal and downloaded from portal) was the same (210 Kb) but the content was different. I will add also a excerpt from that downloaded file that differed from the initial file. How could we avoid similar problems in the future? Thank you.
    366 ;
    Font-Weight : Bold ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica
    Font-Size : 10pt ;
    .PortletHeading2{
    Color : #003366 ;
    Font-Size : 9pt ;
    Font-Weight :
    Bold ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica ;
    .PortletHeading3{
    Color
    : #003366 ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Weight : Bold ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica
    Font-Size : 8pt ;
    .PortletHeading4{
    Font-Weight : Bold ;
    Font-Size : 7pt ;
    Font-Family
    : Arial, Helvetica ;
    Color : #003366 ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    .PortletSubHeaderColor
    Background-Color : #CCCC99 ;
    .PortletSubHeaderLink{
    Font-Size : 8pt ;
    Font-Family :
    Arial, Helvetica ;
    Color : #003366 ;
    .PortletSubHeaderText{
    Color : #003366 ;
    Font-Family :
    Arial, Helvetica ;
    Font-Size : 10pt ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Weight : Bold ;
    PortletText1{
    Color : #000000 ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Size : 10pt ;
    Font-Family :
    Arial, Helvetica ;
    .PortletText2{
    Color : #000000 ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    Font-Size :
    9pt ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica ;
    .PortletText3{
    Color : #000000 ;
    Font-Size : 8pt ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica ;
    Text-Decoration : none ;
    .PortletText4
    Color : #000000 ;
    Font-Family : Arial, Helvetica ;
    Font-Size : 7pt ;
    Text-Decoration :
    none ;
    .RightCurve{
    .LeftSubTabid19siteid0{
    Background-Repeat : no-repeat
    Background-Position : left top ;
    Background-Image :
    url(http://192.168.87.111:7777/images/FFFFFFsl.gif) ;
    Background-Color : #336699
    Background-Attachment : scroll ;
    .LeftTabBgSlantid19siteid0{
    Background-Image :
    url(http://192.168.87.111:7777/images/FFFFFFtl.gif) ;

    I am having the exact same problem on 10.1.4. I have a pdf on my desktop which opens fine in Acrobat reader (v 7.0). I upload it to my portal page as a file and when I click on the link I get the "this file is damaged and cannot be repaired" message. I downloaded the portal version of the PDF and an extra 66 bytes had been added to it.
    I only get this in my live environment as the file uploaded OK in user test. I have uploaded other PDF files and they can be viewed OK.
    Has anyone come across and fixed this in the six years since the original post?
    Thanks,
    Steven.

  • Restrict sensitive document leakage from Printing, "Save as", Copying and Priting screen?

    Our President highly suspected some of our staff who have sold the confidential documents to competitors but we do not have enough proof. How can we restrict sensitive data leakage from Printing, "Save as", Copying and Priting screen?
    Thank you for your advice in advance.

    Adobe LiveCycle Rights Management can apply DRM to a PDF file, which prevents printing and content extraction, and links access to the document to a user login - but there is no way to prevent that user saving a copy of the file to disk or a USB drive, or making multiple copies, no from telling someone else their login details. You can revoke access remotely if you suspect a copy has been stolen, but there's no DRM solution for PDF files which can lock the content to a hardware platform, for example in the way a copy of Windows "activates" itself. Opening and copying a file are two entirely-different concepts, and if a LCDRM-encrypted file is published to the Web without the login details to open it, we can be absolutely certain it cannot be cracked as the encryption hashes used by Adobe are so complex they would take billions of years to break, even with government-level resources. Naturally if a user reveals their login details to someone, LiveCycle's audit trail will prove this and you can take legal action against that user, but they may not care if the document has sufficient value.
    Using PDF there is no way to block access to the Print Screen button. Some third-party software converts the PDF into a proprietary file format which only opens in their own software, that in turn attempts to block the print screen keystroke, but it's not hack-proof and the resulting file is of course no longer a PDF. Ultimately if you can see something on screen you can always copy it, either by use of a custom display driver, remote-desktop system or photographing the screen with a cellphone camera, and re-OCRing the pages from those photos.
    Where documents are sufficiently-important to require a guarantee that on-screen reading is the only possible thing a user can do once the file is opened, they should be restricted to using hardware in secured locations, where network access, printers, USB ports etc. can all be removed. This is the approach taken by many enterprise and public-sector agencies; but once a document is distributed to an unregulated location there will always be a way around copy protection on page content if a user can open the file and view it on screen. While there are some interactive page elements in PDF which are harder to "screen scrape" than others (SWF, video and 3D), it can be done. The only elements of a PDF file which can be guaranteed secure even in an unsecure location are invisible features such as scripts when the PDF is protected using LCDRM to ensure it cannot be opened in third-party software.

Maybe you are looking for