Down payment req

hi,
I have an issue with relevant to the GL account assignment in down payment requests. In OBYR I have defined a new special GL indicator as c and defined a recon account (240070) and a special GL account (150070). This GL account which I have assigned is currently using as a Balance sheet Asset GL. My question is whether this special GL account needs to be a recon account? Currently this is open item management is ticked not a recon account.
help me soon.
Gayani

Hi Gayani
Yes, you have to assign reconciliation account to special g/l indicator & special gl in OBYR.and it must be balance sheet - Asset a/c if down payment is made and there will be balance sheet- Liabilities a/c if down payment is received.For reconciliation account Field status is always G067.
Hope it clears.
assign points if useful
Nilesh

Similar Messages

Vendor down payment req

Hi All,
When i try to create a down payment request from f-47, it gives an error " Special G/L indicator F is not defined for down payments".
However the same is defined in OBYR, can you explain what other configurations are required?

Hi,
Do account assigment for spl GL indicator F (down payment request) thru FBKP
F down payment request
A down payment
but when you post down payment request we need to mention down paymnet A
Thanks
G.Bharathi

Internal Reconciliation - Payment transactions applied to down payment req

Our client has 2 transactions in their Suspense Account:
1. Incoming Payment: Type = Other and have posted an amount to a G/L Suspense Account.
2. General Journal: One side to the Expense (credit) and the other side to the Suspense Account (debit)[this was for a refund]
When they go into the Suspense account to perform an internal reconciliation, the system errors with a message - "Payment transactions applied to down payment requests cannot be reconciled here"
The problem is that they have not used a Down Payment Invoice at any stage of the transaction...
They are on v2007A Patch 06

Logged with SAP been waiting for 3 months and no reponse assume that this is a bug

Down payment request for contract with periodic billing

Hi Friends,
Could anyone help me in understanding the configuration settings for down payment / advance payment senario for a CONTRACT which has Order related billing (I have done for Order with milestone billing plan).
The contract has order related *periodic billing plan* where settlement period is suppose quaterly billing and actual invoice is happening on 1st date of the quarter. But i want to create a down payment request say 10 days before the billing date[(actual invoice(F2) date] of every quater as an advance payment/ down payment.
FYI...
For order i am using standard billing rule 1 in milestone billing plan for final invoice but for downpaymnet billing dates (added additional settlement periods then actual invoice settlement period like 3 adv pay ment og 20%, 30% 50% & one actual invoice period for whole amount 100% as D4 doc only) i am manually changing the billing rule as 4 to create a down payment req.
But in contract as its has periodic billing plan no billing rule changing option (no additional settlement period can be added, only settlement period for actual invoice is getting proposed) so i can't have two different rule for a settlement period. no settlement period can be added separately for adv paymnet/down payment.
Kindly respond ASAP.
Rgds
Manish

Hi, Many thanks for your response.
But the down payment functionality for a SO with milestone billing i have already implemented.
The question was for CONTRACT Side (say rental / service contract). The contract has periodic billing (monthly / Q'ly).
Kindly let me know if you/anyone has any idea for config settings for a contract with the senario mentioned in previous thread post.
Thnx & Rgds
MG

PO no. field is mandatory PO, purchaser has to create a Down Payment Reques

Hi Guyas
whenever an advance is to be released against a
PO, purchaser has to create a Down Payment Request through t. code F-47.
Right now, PO no. field is not mandatory & system allows users to create
a down payment request due to which same cost isn't getting reflected in
the project structure report as well as in the PO history.
Please help me
JK

Hi,
I got your issue.
You are trying to create a down payment request for an asset PO.
As a standard behaviour of the system, it always allows you to create down payment requests without PO reference also.
If you make the field status mandatory for the PO number field for field status group used in your alternative recon GL account of vendors, then you cannot create further down payment requests without a PO reference.
One more issue is that, if you do a down payment req for a asset PO, then the asset used in that PO will be capitalised also during F-48, if u do F-48 with reference to F-47 DP request. But most the companies does not want the asset to be capitalised at the Down payment level.
So i have a solution to fix this issue. Which will post down pay req and down payments as like for normal POs.
First find the field status groups, which are used in your alternative recon accounts of spl GL indicator F and A.
Then go to OBC4, and choose those field status groups and go to asset accounting part and supress and fields ASSET NO and Sub number.
Then go to OBA5, enter message class as F5 and enter
There add an entry for message number 378 and change the message type as W.
Now do F-47. It will now be posted as like normal POs only. And the F-48 also will be fine.
This will completely resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu
SRB_ASSETPO

Purchase register query based on down payment invoice

Hai All,
I am creating an invoice based on purchase order.The vat tax is being calculated in the downpayment. I want the vat to be displayed in the downpayment invoice as well as the a/p invoice but i m not getting it in the a/p invoice. Pls guide me with the linking of tables to get the query working. I have formatted the fields req but could not link the tables...Pls guide me with that...
Thanks & Regards,
Neela

Hi Neela,
Check the thread.
Re: Purchase register query based on down payment invoice
FROM PCH1 T0
INNER JOIN OPCH T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
INNER JOIN OSLP T2 ON T0.SlpCode = T2.SlpCode
LEFT OUTER JOIN PCH12 T3 ON T1.DocEntry = T3.DocEntry
LEFT JOIN ODPI T4 ON T1.CardCode = T4.CardCode
INNER JOIN DPO1 T5 ON T0.ItemCode = T5.ItemCode
Close the thread, if issue solved.
Regards,
Madhan.

Down Payment for Contracts

Hi,
I have a scenario where a vendor is having yearly contract (PO). He is paid upfront at the begining of the year when invoice for full amount is received (amount debit to vendor pre paid / alternate recon account and credit bank). Later at each month, partial amount is expensed (debit) and pre paid / alternate recon account credited accordingly. At the end of the year the full amount is expensed and pre paid account is also balanced.
I am thinking of using vendor down payment functionality (F-47, special GL indicator A), attach a PO (with Invoicing plan and ERS combination), make down payment. Up till this stage the FI entries are debit vendor pre paid / alternate recon account and credit Bank (which is expected). Now with the Invoice plan, the system creates vendor invoice automatically, FI entries are debit expense and credit vendor recon account. We don not want to pay the vendor again as down payment already exist. Is there an automated way now to post credit entry in vendor pre paid account.
I was also going through the earlier post where I found similar issue (Re: Down Payment). However while posting the invoice I am not getting the entries as mentioned in step 2 (check link) i.e. credit pre paid vendor recon account
Any help is appreciated or any solution as well
SR

we have used the following substitution to do that
pre-req
SYST-TCODE = 'F110' AND BKPF-BLART = 'KZ' AND
BSEG-BSCHL = '29' AND
BSEG-UMSKZ = 'A'
Substitution
field "Payment block' is substituted by constant " " (Empty)
Instead of KZ you need to use the document type that is assigned in the your config FBZP for Payment method in country.
This will not allow the payment for the subsequent invoices and payment program will automatically clear the Down payment when all the invoices which will net the downpayment to Zero have been posted.
Thanks
Ron

Bank sub account line item still showing as a open item after down payment

hi
1) i created a dwnpymt req using TCODE:f_37
2) created dwnpymt for dwmpymt req using TCODE:F-29
3) created customer invoice using Tcode:F-22
4) clear dwnpyment req against invioce using TCODe:F-39
now my question is when i create dwn pyment i used bank subaccount(cheq rec) to debit and customer to credit
so after i cleared dwnpymt with invoice. the bank sub account line item still showing as a open item .
why?
i appreaciate your usefull inputs
thanq.

Hi
I hope you will be running manual or electronic bank statement at your company.
The bank sub account that has been posted gets cleared when you run manual or electronic bank statement.
Let me explain you in detail
The entry that got posted during the down payment received from Customer--
Check Receipt A/C Debit
Customer A/C Credit
When you run the manual or electronic bank statement the entry gets posted as
Main Bank A/C Debit
Check Receipt A/C Credit there by clearing the open item from the Check Receipt A/C.
Hope this helps you in understanding how the open item in Check Receipt A/C gets cleared.
Good Luck
Hari

Spl G/L Down Payment Requst Problem

Hi SAP,
I have a issue in Spl GL "F"--> I have given my Recon a/c as well Down Payment Request G/L also and in properties i assiged as Noted Item with Target spl GL is F
But when i am trying to post in F-47 Its saying "spl GL F Not defined for down payment" I am sure i given raido button on Down payment/ down payment request.
and If i remove noted Item tick mark its accepting the entry in F-47 but not showing request in F-48.
What to do?? am missing any configuration part???
Regards,

Hi Pokala,
in transaction OBYR, You should define:
K A Dwn pmt
and
K F Pmt req --> properties Target sp.G/L ind. A and Noted item v
When You run F-47, enter A in Special Gl field and not F, once posted it would show F.
I hope this helps.
mauri

Vendor Down Payment Clearing: F-54 or F-44

Hi
I have made a down payment (with Spl. GL indicator) to a vendor, using F-48. Then I book an invoice using FB60. I kept the two amounts same and ignored WT to keep things simple.
Now i want to clear the down payment against the invoice. I use F-54. The clearing transaction is getting posted. However, the Invoice is lying open (credit entry) along with the Clearing document (debit entry). On the other hand the down payment document (debit) is getting cleared with the Clearing document (credit entry). This means I have two open line items and two cleared line items. I can clear the two open items again using F-44.
I have two questions:
1. What is the use of F-54 here since I have to use F-44 eventually?
2. While doing F-54, Posting Key for the debit line item is 26 : Payment Difference. This is could not understand.
Can anyone please help me out on this?
Thanks in advance
Aninda

Dear Aninda ,
I will explain you with following example.
Recon account(Vendor)---3000000
Advance to Vendor----
4005000
Exp a/c----
7575100
Bank a/c----
5000100
1. Advance to Vendor (spl gl -A)(F-48)
Vendor a/c    (SPL-A)( GL- 4005000)        DR   1000
                  T0 Bank a/c (GL-5000100)                  1000
2. Invoice posting
Expenditure a/c ( GL-7575100) Dr      1000
     To Vendor Account(GL-3000000)     1000
3. Clear Vendor Down Payment (F-54)
Vendor a/c (GL-3000000) DR                1000 (Posting key-26)
     To Vendor a/c (SPL-A)( GL- 4005000)          1000
It means Credited spl GL-A has converted from advance to Normal open item. Amount has been transferred from Advance to Vendor GL to Normal Recon account.By this way Advance account shows Nil Balance with debit(F-48) and Credit (F-54)
The remaining 2 line items i.e., Credit (F-43) and Debit (F-54) shows as open items. In the next step we need to knock off those line items by manual clearing or automatic clearing.
4. Normal Clearing (F-44)
It will be posted without line items.
I hope i am able to help you out to understand process

CO Object Assignment Error while posting Down Payment Request

User is raising a Down Payment Request for the purchase of an Asset through a Purchasing Document. This Asset Master has got the cost center and WBS Element assigned in it.
System while saving the DP Request is throwing an error that CO Account Assignments has different Profit Centers
I have also checked the cost center master but the profit center assigned there is correct only. Should I check the OKB9 settings ? If yes, for which GL Account do I need to check ? Where else can I check the CO Object Assignments for profit centers ?
Requirement is critical. Please help.
Thank you
Ravi
9849393564

Hi,
Good evening and greetings,
Please have a look in GGB1 (Profit Centre Substitution), there may be some rule which is overriding the OKB9.
Please reward points if found useful.
Thanking you,
With kindest regards,
Ramesh Padmanabhan

Error While Posting the Asset Down Payment

Dear Members,
When I am doing Asset down payment through F-48, I am getting the following error.
Before that I would like to inform you that I created 2 GL Accounts. i.e. Down Payments on Assets ( Recon A/c Assets ) and Second GL A/c is Asset Clearing A/c ( With out Recon A/c ).
Further I assigned in T. Code - AO90, I assigned the Down Payments on Assets GL A/c and In Clearing column I assigned the Asset Clearing A/c.
Even though it is giving the following error.
Item category 07000 not allowed in accounting transaction 1000/0001
Message no. GLT2001
Diagnosis
The online document splitting is active in your system. Here, each document is assigned to a accounting transaction variant and each document row to an item category.
You determine for each business transaction variant which item categories can or must be posted here.
The following error occurred for the document you entered:
Item category 07000 in accounting transaction 1000, variant 0001 is not allowed.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
Check the document entered, the derivation of the business transaction variant, the derivation of the item category, and the assignment of the item categories to the business transaction variant.
do the needful at the earliest.
Thanking You
Regards
K. S. Kumar

Hi Sai Kumar,
Go to Document splitting node..
And check against the doc type that you are using in F-48, what business transaction variant is assigned in Classify document types for Document Splitting.
next go to the following node....
Doc Splitting->Extended Doc Splitting-> Define Business Transaction variants
and select your business transaction variant as defined above and copy that and give it a name Z001,
now select Z001 and double click on Assigned Item categories.., then select new entries and add 07000 Asset there and save.. it will give a warning message but just go on saving.
next go to the node Classify document types for Document Splitting again and enter this Business transaction variant againt the document type that u r using in F-48. AND it will work.
Regards,
SAPFICO

Error -Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area

When I am trying to pass a down payment entry by debiting vedor and crediting bank with asset it is giving an error as follows.
Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area 01
Message no. AU133
Please help me to rectify the same.
Thanks in advance
Deepak

HI
Please pay attention at the possible causes of message AU133:
1. Error AU133:
   a) You have not defined a contra account for acquisition value postings in the Asset Accounting Customizing settings (Transaction AO90).However, this is required as of Release 4.6C because, as is the case for all other integration postings in Asset Accounting, invoice receipt postings have to be displayed in Asset Accounting via the new posting kernel to ensure an identical document
structure.
   b) You have defined the account in Asset Accounting, however, it is not created in the affected company code.Check whether the account is correct and create it for the company code, if necessary.
2. You have entered an asset reconciliation account for the "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" (for example, the same account as for   "Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs" account).This is not permitted.Check whether your account determination is correct
   (Transaction AO90) in Asset Accounting Customizing. The same applies
   for the 'Contra account: Down payment posting'.
3. As "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" you entered an asset G/L account. If necessary change the automatic posting indicator in the G/L account master record.
4.Check if you need revaluation accounts in depreciation areas involved   (AO90):
-Revaluation acquis. and production costs
-Offsetting account: Revaluation APC
Please run also programm RACKONTO where missing or wrong customizing
the accoutn determinations per company code is displayed
Also have a look at note 7595 in this regard.
Please assign points if it useful.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Creation of A/R Down Payment Invoice based on Sales Order not logical

When creating a A/R Down Payment Invoice based on a Sales Order you
have the option to create multible ones. Which by itself could be
usefull to create one of 50 % for a certain day and decide they need to
pay another 25 % at a later date.
But SBO does not track what already have been posted. Therefore you can
create a sum more then a 100% without warning or blockage.
Tested this in SBO 2007 A SP:00 PL:00
Scenario:
Sales - AR>Sales Order
Create and post a Sales Order
Sales - AR>A/R Down Payment Invoice
Create an A/R Down Payment
Select the BP and copy the Sales Order
Set DPM to 40%
Post the A/R Down Payment
Sales - AR>A/R Down Payment Invoice
Create an A/R Down Payment
Select the BP and copy the Sales Order
Set DPM to 100%
Post the A/R Down Payment
Sales - AR>A/R Down Payment Invoice
Create an A/R Down Payment
Select the BP and copy the Sales Order
Set DPM to 70%
Post the A/R Down Payment
Making the total for the Sales Order 210% worth of Down Payment
Invoices without warning/blocking. I would expected that you would only
be able to set the rest sum %. For instance first scenario I entered
60% therefore setting the second Down Payment Invoice to a max of 40%
Untill you have used up the 100% and you cannot select the Sales Order
in question..
If multible users do the same work, SBO doesn't show that it has
already been done. Same if you forgot you already created it you can
still create one. Plus sometimes it will happenyou create the Down
Payment Invoice and not paying attention you create the first one with
a 100% and later with the intended percentage..

Hello Petronella,
you are right that B1 is not checking the total value of DP created from the Sales Order.
The logic and checking procedure here is only between Sales Order -> Delivery/Invoice.
DP Invoice is considered as transaction related to document the receipt of the money (parallel to the sales process). Between the moment of basing of DP to Sales Order it is still possibility to adjust Sales Order as there is no posting behind Sales Order.
The question is what would be a checking procedure in case that on Sales Order there is based Delivery and DP? What would be the system priority to take into a consideration?
Regards,
Martin Slavik
Regional Solution Manager

Trying to create a query that shows Sales Order/Invoice Totals as well as Paid/Outstanding/Available Down Payments

Currently working on SAP B1 v8.82
I'm looking to generate a query that will give an overall report for a given customer that shows Sales Order No, Invoice No, Sales Order Total, Invoice Total, Amount Paid on Invoice, Amount Remaining on Invoice, Down Payments Available, Open on Sales Order.
I'm not sure what the best way to select the columns in bold above. Invoice Total should be self-explanatory. Amount Paid should be any down payments or applied payments on the invoice. The balance due on the invoice (which seems to be T0.DocTotal if I'm not mistaken) should = 'Invoice Total' - 'Amount Paid on Invoice'. In the Down Payments Available column I want the total amount of money on the account or on down payments that aren't tied to a Sales Order. If a client overpaid in the past for instance and there's a credit on their account, then it should contribute to this sum. Open on Sales Order should be pretty easy. I guess it's just the sum of everything that is still open on the Sales Order. I'm just not sure what the best way to sum all the un-delivered freight, tax, and line items is. Here's what my query looks like so far.
SELECT DISTINCT T4.[DocNum] [Sales Order No],
T0.DocNum [Invoice No],
T4.DocTotal [Sales Order Total]
T0.DocTotal [Amount Outstanding],
FROM OINV T0
INNER JOIN INV1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
INNER JOIN DLN1 T2 ON T1.BaseEntry = T2.DocEntry AND T1.BaseLine = T2.LineNum
INNER JOIN RDR1 T3 ON T2.BaseEntry = T3.DocEntry AND T2.BaseLine = T3.LineNum
INNER JOIN ORDR T4 ON T3.DocEntry = T4.DocEntry
INNER JOIN OSLP T5 ON T4.SlpCode = T5.SlpCode
WHERE T0.CardName Like '%%[%0]%%'
GROUP BY T4.DocNum, T0.DocNum, T0.DocTotal, T4.DocTotal
I tried doing a little searching around for queries similar to what I need, but I could find exactly what I was looking for and I'm very unfamiliar with OJDT, JDT1, and ITR1 tables which I think might be important to finding unapplied payments...

Thanks. There's a few problems though.
1) It seems that OINV DocTotal != Balance Due. I'm seeing a number of invoices where there was a balance due, but we applied additional money (either we took another incoming payment and applied it or applied money from the account balance, etc.) and yet it still shows a total.
2) It's pulling incoming payments from different customers. I think this is because the table was joined based on "RCT2 T4 on T4.[DocEntry] = T3.[DocNum] and T4.[InvoiceId] = T2.[LineNum]" In one example I have 2 incoming payments 446 and 614. Both have the DocEntry 542, but one relates to A/R Invoice 542 (for a different client) while the other relates to Down Payment Invoice 542. *I was able to fix this by adding WHERE T5.CardCode = [%0]*
3) I'm going to work with this a little bit and see if I can alter it to make it work for me. Basically this query falls a little short on the following:
- Doesn't include incoming payments that aren't linked to a down payment invoice.
- Does not give the Invoice Total (I'd like to know how much of the SO was invoiced. DocTotal seems to give me Amount Invoiced - Down Payments. I'm not sure the best way to get this number. Maybe I could do the sum of each line * tax + freight)
- Does not give the outstanding amount on an invoice. The ARtotal [DocTotal] column gives me how much was owed when the invoice was created, but it doesn't tell me what is currently owed.
- Lastly it may complicate the query too much and could be left off, but it would be nice to see if they have any money from credits or incoming payments that has not been applied. Perhaps this would be easily accomplished by simply pulling in their account balance.

Down payment req

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for