DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 0, timeout)

Hello,
In our CRM system EHP1 FOR CRM 7 ABAP ,users get this screen mainly for big contracts at different stages like collision run,saving.
Status before error started
I have already gone through notes 1757252
But the parameter rdisp/max_vm_priv_time and rdisp/max_vm_priv_no doesn't exist in our system. Instead is there any other parameter which we can use in our release ?
I could find these errors when the timeout screen occurred :
DEV_DISP
Wed Jul 23 15:26:08 2014
DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
Wed Jul 23 15:26:28 2014
DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
Wed Jul 23 15:26:46 2014
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24366
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24502
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24691
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
sm21:
Q0 G Request (type DIA) cannot be processed
work process trace
please check the image
Thanks
Shradha

Hello Divyanshu
It didnt create dev_vm.trc and VM_STACK_TRACE
And I am unable to provide dev_disp and dev_w* here due to size of the trace
But could the error be due to any of these parameters :
Parameters
Current
Changed
rdisp/max_vm_priv_time
2400
SERVLET=2400, RFC=2400
isp/max_vm_priv_no
3
SERVLET=3, RFC=3
rdisp/max_priv_time
600
3600
Maximum hold time for work processes in PRIV mode
rdisp/max_debug_lazy_time
600
3600
Maximum hold time for work processes in DEBUG mode
rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no
1000
1058
Buffer Size for CPI-C Communications
rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no
300
1058
Work Process Communication Blocks
vmcj/option/ps
960M
1460M
poolsize for the VMC
vmcj/option/gc/sharedWaterMark
90
70
VMC: watermark for shared garbage collector
vmcj/max_vm_heap_MB
64
128
max. vm heap
rdisp/keepalive
1200
3600
Timer for check of unused connections
rdisp/keepalive_timeout
60
150
Timeout for connection to SAPGUI
rdisp/wppriv_max_no
DEFAULT
16
Maximum number of work processes in PRIV mode

Similar Messages

Max number of items exceeded?

I am trying to develop a questionaire like application. Most of the logic is stored inside pl/sql functions (that is retrieving the previous or next question with possible answers and answer-types, like, eg. radiogroup, select-list, textarea, ...) while all of the questions and respective possible answers are kept inside a collection. In processing the answers after submit I store given answers inside the same collection, basically by nullifying all possibly previously given answers for the current question and then looping through eg, g_f01.count to refill. The entire application remains on the same page, showing eg., in one 'frame', one or two questions with say 7 checkboxes and two textareas.
Everything seems to work fine, I can go forward and backward and will find new questions or ones that already have been answerd, but!!...
after the 50st item (answer), that is after I reached the 50st radiogroup, checkbox or textarea, new checkboxes or radiogroups even though shown the resulting values will not be stored inside the collection anymore.
generating the page i use:
htp.prn(apex_item.radiogroup(p_idx => 1, p_value => c2.a_id, p_selected_value => c2.qa_id, p_attributes => 'id="P2_QUEST_' || i || '"'));
and in processing correspondingly ...
FOR i IN 1 .. apex_application.g_f01.COUNT
LOOP
FOR c2 IN
(SELECT seq_id,
c001 q_id,
c002 a_id,
c012 qa_id
FROM apex_collections
WHERE c001 = to_char(p_q_id)
AND collection_name = 'ANSWERS'
AND c002 = apex_application.g_f01(i))
LOOP
apex_collection.update_member_attribute(p_collection_name =>
'ANSWERS', p_seq => c2.seq_id, p_attr_number => '12',
p_attr_value => c2.a_id);
END LOOP;
END LOOP;
to me I only use f01 ... f04 say, ... Is it possible that I still hit the max of 50 page-items?
Regards
j.

max number of items exceeded?

Real-time 8.6 Remote panel connection exceeds max number of licenses- with no connections

I've been using the remote panel right along with no problems to connect to my Compact Fieldpoint. This morning I accidently opened the connection twice on the same computer and tripped the "Remote panel connection exceeds max number of licenses" error. Now it will not let me connect anymore from my computer. I've tried clearing cookies, cache and history in Internet Explorer and rebooting my computer. I've fired up the Remote Panel Connection Manager which shows no connections, and the NI License Information window does not show any connections which have been denied due to max # of clients being exceeded. Is there a way to reset this without having to reboot my RT controller? I'm running RT8.6 and LV 8.6 Full Dev System and understanding that it should come with 1 remote panel license.
Thanks
maat
LV2014

The boss wanted to see an updated feature, so I was forced to deploy a new version and reboot. Problem went away as I suspected it would.
I did manage to make the same mistake again this morning (launch the remote panel in 2 different MSIE windows) and after closing them both I could reconnect. Must be a glitch or a bug? It'd be interesting to see if anyone else has this problem. For now...solved, but it would be nice to see a way to fix this without rebooting.
Message Edited by maat on 10-22-2008 10:10 AM
maat
LV2014

Max. number of expressions exceeded

I have a simple SQL to select data from a single table with a
list of 1000 elements i.e. SELECT A FROM TABLE_A WHERE B IN (1,
2, 3, ..., 1000). It worked fine. If I added one more i.e.
WHERE B IN (1, 2, 3, ...., 1000, 1001), then I got error 1795 -
Max number of expressions exceeded 254. I thought this error
applies to the number of expressions. What I have was a list of
values in a single expression -> B IN (1, 2, ...).
I think the error message is misleading. If there is a limit of
1000 elements in the IN expression, the error message should say
so unlesss Oracle somehow formats the 1000 elements into 254
expressions behind the scene.
Any comments.
Thanks.
null

What versions are you using?
Do you have a License?
thanks
mike

Max number of VMs per free ESXi hypervisor?

VMware Community,
I've just installed the free ESXi 5.5 hypervisor and I'm wondering if the same virtual machine limits apply to the standalone scenario as vCenter? Can I actually run 512 VMs? What, if any, is the max number of VMs I can run on a free version of ESXi?

As of ESXi 5.5 most limitations were removed and only an 8 vCPU limit per virtual machine remains. So unless I'm mistaken, the mentioned 512 VM per host (see http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsphere5/r55/vsphere-55-configuration-maximums.pdf) apply to the free Hypervisor too.
André

Genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded

Hi .,
I am getting the following error in my console rapidly.
I am using Sun Sparc server running with Solaris 10 ., We start getting this error
suddently after a restart of the server and the error is continously rolling on the console...
The Error:
Rebooting with command: boot
Boot device: disk0 File and args:
SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_118822-25 64-bit
Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Hardware watchdog enabled
Failed to send email alert for recent event.
SC Alert: Failed to send email alert for recent event.
Hostname: nitwebsun01
NOTICE: VxVM vxdmp V-5-0-34 added disk array DISKS, datype = Disk
NOTICE: VxVM vxdmp V-5-3-1700 dmpnode 287/0x0 has migrated from enclosure FAKE_ENCLR_SNO to enclosure DISKS
checking ufs filesystems
/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s4: is logging.
/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s7: is logging.
nitwebsun01 console login: Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 439
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 414
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 413
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 414
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 413
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 414
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 413
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 1 time
Nov 20 14:56:43 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 470
Nov 20 14:56:43 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 467
Nov 20 14:56:44 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 470
Nov 20 14:56:44 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:44 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 1 time
Nov 20 14:56:49 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 503
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 510
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 519
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 516
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 519
Nov 20 14:56:53 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 540
Nov 20 14:56:53 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 2 times
Nov 20 14:56:53 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 549
Nov 20 14:56:53 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 4 times
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 665
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 6 times
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 667
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 2 times
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:57 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 868
Nov 20 14:56:57 nitwebsun01 /usr/lib/snmp/snmpdx: unable to get my IP address: gethostbyname(nitwebsun01) failed [h_errno: host not found(1)]
Nov 20 14:56:58 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 887
Nov 20 14:57:00 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 976
nitwebsun01 console login: root
Nov 20 14:57:00 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 2 times
Here I attached my /etc/project file also..
[root@nitwebsun01 /]$ cat /etc/project
system:0::::
user.root:1::::
process.max-file-descriptor=(privileged,1024,deny);
process.max-sem-ops=(privileged,512,deny);
process.max-sem-nsems=(privileged,512,deny);
project.max-sem-ids=(privileged,1024,deny);
project.max-shm-ids=(privileged,1024,deny);
project.max-shm-memory=(privileged,4294967296,deny)
noproject:2::::
default:3::::
process.max-file-descriptor=(privileged,1024,deny);
process.max-sem-ops=(privileged,512,deny);
process.max-sem-nsems=(privileged,512,deny);
project.max-sem-ids=(privileged,1024,deny);
project.max-shm-ids=(privileged,1024,deny);
project.max-shm-memory=(privileged,4294967296,deny)
group.staff:10::::
[root@nitwebsun01 /]$
Help me to came out of this issue
Regards
Suseendran .A

This is an old post but I'm going to reply to it for future reference of others.
Please ignore the first reply to this thread... by default /etc/rctladm.conf doesn't exist, and you should never use it. Just put it out of your mind.
So, then... by default, a process can have no more than 256 file descriptors open at any given time. The likelyhood that you'll have a program using more than 256 files very low... but, each network socket counts as a file descriptor, therefore many network services will exceed this limit quickly. The 256 limit is stupid but it is a standard, and as such Solaris adheres to it. To look at the open file descriptors of a given process use "pfiles <pid>".
So, to change it you have several options:
1) You can tune the default threshold on the number of descriptors by specifying a new default threshold in /etc/system:
set rlim_fd_cur=1024
2) On the shell you can view your limit using 'ulimit -n' (use 'ulimit' to see all your limit thresholds). You can set it higher for this session by supplying a value, example: 'ulimit -n 1024', then start your program. You might also put this command in a startup script before starting your program.
3) The "right" way to do this is to use a Solaris RCTL (resource control) defined in /etc/project. Say you want to give the "oracle" user 8152 fd's... you can add the following to /etc/project:
user.oracle:101::::process.max-file-descriptor=(priv,8152,deny)
Now log out the Oracle user, then log back in and startup.
You can view the limit on a process like so:
prctl -n process.max-file-descriptor -i process <pid>
In that output, you may see 3 lines, one for "basic", one for "privileged" and one for "system". System is the max possible. Privileged is the limit by which you need to have special privs to raise. Basic is the limit that you as any user can increase yourself (such as using 'ulimit' as we did above). If you define a custom "priviliged" RCTL like we did above in /etc/projects it will dump the "basic" priv which is, by default, 256.
For reference, if you need to increase the threshold of a daemon that you can not restart, you can do this "hot" by using the 'prctl' program like so:
prctl -t basic -n process.max-file-descriptor -x -i process <PID>
The above just dumps the "basic" resource control (limit) from the running process. Do that, then check it a minute later with 'pfiles' to see that its now using more FD's.
Enjoy.
benr.

Max no of conversation 100 exceed

Hi all,
We are now in SAP R/3 version 4.70 running on Oracle 9.i with HPUX
11.23.Currently we are facing CPIC error that mention about the Error
max no of 100 conversation exceed.
I have read though all the SAP note as show below:
0000074141 Resource Management for tRFC and aRFC
0000314530 Number of RFC/CPIC connections for external clients
0000316877 Maximum number of conversation exceeded
0001054121 The SAP Ecosystem in a Nutshell
And since this RFC connection error is occurs at the jave level,it is the
responsibility of RFC caller to close the connection. A client program opens the connection for calling funtion module(s) and has to close this connection, as soon as this connection is in use any more.
So i would like to know the BAPI Function module so that i can initiate it from the the RFC caller.I hope if possible recommend me a way to terminate this RFC connection in Java.
hereby is the attached screenshot for the error.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/z3qn85
Message was edited by:
yeong kah fei

Hi,
ideally your application uses client pools. If so, then you have to make sure that after acquiring a client from the connection pool (<client>=JCO.getClient(<poolname)) and executing the RFC's for the given thread, you have to return the client to the pool (JCO.releaseClient(<client>)).
This should be sufficient when using client pools. If you have individual RFC connections not managed via a client pool, then you can close the connection once it's no longer used (jcoClient.disconnect()).
Hope this helps.
Best wishes, harald

Error in Portal "max no of 100 conversaction exceed" while getting 2 backnd

hi experts
i am getting following Error
RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION: connect to SAP Gateway failed
Max no of 100 conversaction exceed.
please suggst me the needful??
is this JCO-Destination error? or some thing Else??
Thanks
narpal

Hi Narpal,
By default Portal allows 100 simultaneous instant messaging sessions. But this number can be increased.
Navigate to
System Administration -> System Configuration -> Collaboration -> Real Time Collaboration (RTC) -> RTC Engine -> RTCEngine
- Switch to Advanced Mode
- Modify MaximumChatSessions parameter and set to 500
- Restart the Portal Server
The problem should be resolved then.
Regards,
Sudip

"SYSTEM FAILURE" during JCo call. max no of 100 conversations exceeded

Hi Experts,
My scernario is : RFC->File Asynch
When i do testing this scenario in Configuration (ID) -> tools-> test configuration I got below error.
Interface Mapping
Runtime error
"SYSTEM FAILURE" during JCo call. max no of 100 conversations exceeded / CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPCMRCV' : cmRc=17 thRc=45
1) I have created incremented 100 to 300: Set the following environment variable CPIC_MAX_CONV=300
2) In sender RFC communication channel i have all correct parameters like: gateway service,Program ID, client number, password, userid etc
Pleas help me out.
thanks
siva grandhi

hi,
se this
/thread/174978 [original link is broken]
Look at SAP note 314530,316877
set this enviroment Variables:
set CPIC_MAX_CONV = 500 (WINDOWS)
setenv CPIC_MAX_CONV 500 (unix)
also check the rfc destination JCO_RUNTIME_JCOSERVER
AI_RUNTIME_JCOSERVER. if u have any error in this RFC plz refer to this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/9b/da0f41026df223e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Thanks
Rodrigo
ps:reward points if useful
Edited by: Rodrigo Pertierra on Mar 26, 2008 11:59 AM

RuntimeException: Maximum number of gradient stops exceeded (paint uses 17

I run into this exception occasionally
java.lang.RuntimeException: Maximum number of gradient stops exceeded (paint uses 17 stops, but max is 12)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.PaintHelper.stopsToImage(PaintHelper.java:94)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.PaintHelper.initGradient(PaintHelper.java:137)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.PaintHelper.setMultiGradient(PaintHelper.java:164)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.PaintHelper.setLinearGradient(PaintHelper.java:271)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.BaseShaderContext.updatePaintShader(BaseShaderContext.java:208)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.BaseShaderContext.validatePaintOp(BaseShaderContext.java:378)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.BaseShaderContext.validatePaintOp(BaseShaderContext.java:325)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.BaseShaderContext.validatePaintOp(BaseShaderContext.java:284)
at com.sun.prism.impl.BaseContext.validateClearOp(BaseContext.java:78)
at com.sun.prism.d3d.D3DGraphics.clear(D3DGraphics.java:64)
at com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.PaintRunnable.doPaint(PaintRunnable.java:206)
at com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.PaintRunnable.paintImpl(PaintRunnable.java:145)
at com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.PaintRunnable.run(PaintRunnable.java:349)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.prism.render.RenderJob.run(RenderJob.java:29)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer$PipelineRunnable.run(QuantumRenderer.java:101)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Running javafx 2.0.2 with java 1.7.02 on windows 7
Anyone else encountered this and is there a workaround?
In the system there is are rectangles with fill to something similar to
-fx-fill: linear-gradient(from 0% 0% to 100% 0%, rgb(177,177,177) 0%, rgb(255,128,255) 7%, rgb(210,59,54) 12%, rgb(248,100,100) 22%, rgb(252,180,180) 43%, rgb(250,200,200) 44%, rgb(170,170,170) 45%, rgb(248,248,248) 46%, rgb(248,248,248) 59%, rgb(200,200,200) 62%, rgb(180,180,180) 64%, rgb(167,167,167) 65%, rgb(200,200,200) 67%, rgb(248,248,248) 70%, rgb(248,248,248) 90%, rgb(200,200,200) 95%, rgb(166,185,238) 100%);In this case, there are 17 stops to this linear-gradient. If the number of stops is lowered, the exception occurs less often. Based on the exception, it looks like if there is a gradient with more than 12 stops, it is possible to run into this exception.
Thanks
Edited by: 907429 on Jan 12, 2012 10:18 AM

Please post a short reproducible test case surrounded with markers and/or log a bug with a reproducible test case at http://javafx-jira.kenai.com

Is a subquery in a BO report limited to a max number of records???

Here's my problem:
I recieved an excel sheet with 700 records of customers from a client who wants me to to create a report with specific data for these customers in my Business Objects universe (BO6.5 on SQL Server).
So I created a dataprovider with query 1, i.e. the requested data of customers. Then I created a second dataprovider, query 2, based on 'personal files', i.e. the excel sheet. In query 1 I added to the conditions that each customer should be in (sub)query 2 (CustomerId In list of the query result ('query2.CustomerId').
the syntax I have used for this seems OK.
However, I recieve the following error: "Too many selected values (LOV0001)". I know this error has to do with parameter MAX_INLIST_VALUES, which is limited by default to 99 and can be extended to 256 max. But I thought it refers to the max number of items in lists of values.
When I limit the number of records in the excel sheet to 99 the result is perfect (proof that I got the syntax right!). I can upgrade the parameter to 256, and can split the excel sheet into three, but that will not be useful when next time my client sends me 10.000 customer records.
Can I make reports in BO which use subqueries that result in more than 256 records at all? (hardly imaginable).
What is the best way to do this?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Lucas,
Following is the information regarding the issue you are getting and might help you to resolve the issue.
ADAPT00519195- Too many selected values (LOV0001) - Select Query Result operand
For XIR2 Fixed Details-Rejected as this is by design
I have found that this is a limitation by design and when the values exceed 18000 we get this error in BO.
There is no fix for this issue, as itu2019s by design. The product always behaved in this manner.
Also an ER (ADAPT00754295) for this issue has already been raised.
Unfortunately, we cannot confirm if and when this Enhancement Request will be taken on by the developers.
A dedicated team reviews all ERs on a regular basis for technical and commercial feasibility and whether or not the functionality is consistent with our product direction. Unfortunately we cannot presently advise on a timeframe for the inclusion of any ER to our product suite.
The product group will then review the request and determine whether or not the functionality/feature will be included in a future release.
Currently I can only suggest that you check the release notes in the ReadMe documents of future service packs, as it will be listed there once the ER has been included
The only workaround which I can suggest for now is:
Workaround 1:
Test the issue by keep the value of MAX_Inlist_values parameter to 256 on designer level.
Workaround 2:
The best solution is to combine 'n' queries via a UNION. You should first highlight the first 99 or so entries from the LOV list box and then combine this query with a second one that selects the remaining LOV choices.
Using UNION between queries; which is the only possible workaround
Please do let me know if you have any queries related to the same.
Regards,
Sarbhjeet Kaur

Max Number of Procurement Proposal for a date

We have scenario where a user has changed fixed lot size for a material 11,70,000 to 1 Pc. As result more than 2 Million Purchase requisitions got created by MRP. Is there any standard config settings, where we can maintain max number of procurement proposal for given date or demand. So that we can prevent such occurances in future.

Hello Amit.
The materials planning creates a large number of order proposals in the amount of the fixed lot size for this one request for a fixed lot size (lot-sizing procedure 'FX') with a large number of requests and a small number of fixed lot sizes.
In Customizing for the plant parameters of materials planning (transaction OPPQ, table T399D) you can set a parameter for the maximum number of order proposals that are created by materials planning for a requirements date.
The materials planning of this material terminates regularly if the maximum number is exceeded. An error document with error message E098 is generated. This way you can prevent that the MRP run terminates if the lot-sizing procedure is set unfavorably.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

When i try to sign in icloud with different id it says max number of free accounts reached for this device what shall i do

PLease help me.....i wanna sign in icloud with different account but it says max number of free acconts reached

Somehow your Apple ID/iCloud account has been used on multiple iOS devices and exceeded the maximum. We have no way of knowing which devices. We are users like you on this forum.

Max number of caracters in subtitles in Encore? Trying to avoid "Subtitle too complex to render"

Does anyone know what the max number of caracters in a single Encore subtitle "string" is if you want to avoid the "Subtitle too complex to render" error message?
I have a project with one subtitle layer, concisting of 483 "subtitle strings" in it and i'm getting the "...too complex..." message when rendering.
But instead of spending endless hours of trying to guess which one(s) cause the problem, i'd love to have an answer like "Don't ever tap in more than XX caracters in a single subtitle"
And now we are at it:
I'm let to believe that the distance between the individual "subtitle strings" also can release the "...too complex..." message. Any clues as to what the minimum number of frames has to be between the individual "strings" in order to avoid the error message (the project in question is a "classic" DVD-project - not BluRay)?
Thanx in advance.

Well, just in case anyone else is stuck with the same problem and comes across this old string: After several tests I have come up with this solution that works for me - and perhaps for others too:
Notice that the subtitle borders are set differently than the default settings. The settings I use keeps the subtitle string just inside the outer safe area border where as the default settings are inside the inner safe area border and thus resulting in shorter subtitle lines.
You can choose a different typeface and size if you like. These matters doesn't seem to have much influence on the "_too complex_" issue.
With these settings I can write a maximum of 60 characters, including spaces, per line. Remember to make forced line breaks between the lines, if your subtitle string is longer than one line. Otherwise Encore will see what appears to be two lines as one long line exceeding the max number of characters and thus resulting in a "_too complex_" error.
And as for number of frames between subtitle strings: Minimum 5 frames - but Encore will automaticly warn you if you place text strings closer than that.

ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (500) exceeded

Problem Details:
In our Database we are getting huge number of open connection from remote system.
Let say, our application A and remote application name is B.
Some common users of application A are USER0, USER1, USER2.
Remote Application B uses USER0 to create views on application A's table through Database Link.
Those views (nearly 100) are accessed in application B at several places from the Java code.
Since those views are getting called almost all the times from the application B's code, DB link is in use almost all the time - holding many number of connections (check the first row of the query output).
Many times the open connections remaining high and any other application, users trying to connect to application A,
getting the ORA-00020 error.
Note :
1. Application B is very old application and does not use open DB link or close DB link.
2. Application B tried with "alter session close Database link xxx", it decrease the number of open connection but its degrading the performance of application B at large scale.
3. To cope up with this problem Application A recently incraesed the parameter process=500, but not sure if this limit can also be broken through Application B
Questions/Doubts:
1) What is best approach to handle this problem??
'alter session close database link xxx' is the only option from application B's point ??
What other approach can be taken??
2) We are not sure the risk associated with increasing the process parameter value ??
Appreciate your suggestion !!
SQL>conn / as sysdba
SQL> select substr(username,1,8),
       substr(machine,1,11),
       substr(module,1,40),
       substr(osuser,1,7),
       status,
       count(1)
from v$session
group by username, machine, module, osuser, status;
USERNAME MACHINE     STATUS                        OSUSER     COUNT(1)
USER0    remotedb9      INACTIVE                              oracle        450
USER1    app_dev        INACTIVE                              beaadmin        1
USER0    svr01test      ACTIVE                                bdgp_dev        1
USER1    app_test       INACTIVE                              bbk09           2
USER0    app_dev        ACTIVE                                dj0494          1
USER1    app_test       INACTIVE                              pd0269          2
USER2    app_test       INACTIVE                              oracle         12
USER0    app_dev        ACTIVE                                oracle          2
USER2    app_test       INACTIVE                              www             8
USER2    dbr9db01       ACTIVE                                oracle          2
USER2    svr01dv        INACTIVE                              bdgp_dev        1
USER0    app_dev        INACTIVE                              scott           3
USER2    app_test       INACTIVE                              clerk           2
USER2    moose          ACTIVE                                john            2
USER2    titan.homer    INACTIVE                              voipdu          1
NEWUSER floradbdv1     INACTIVE                              oracle          8
SYS      app_test       ACTIVE                                oracle          1
20 rows selected.
SQL>conn USER0@csmip_st
Enter password:
ERROR:
ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (500) exceeded
Warning: You are no longer connected to ORACLE.

semmsl in Linux tells what the max number of processes are. You have to make sure this is equal to the process parameter of all instances plus 10.
It is usually in /etc/sysctl.conf
kernel.sem = 250 32000 100 128
SEMMSL
The SEMMSL kernel parameter is used to control the maximum number of semaphores per semaphore set.
Oracle recommends setting SEMMSL to the largest PROCESS instance parameter setting in the init.ora file for all databases hosted on the Linux system plus 10. Also, Oracle recommends setting the SEMMSL to a value of no less than 100.
SEMMNI
The SEMMNI kernel parameter is used to control the maximum number of semaphore sets on the entire Linux system.
Oracle recommends setting the SEMMNI to a value of no less than 100.
SEMMNS
The SEMMNS kernel parameter is used to control the maximum number of semaphores (not semaphore sets) on the entire Linux system.
Oracle recommends setting the SEMMNS to the sum of the PROCESSES instance parameter setting for each database on the system, adding the largest PROCESSES twice, and then finally adding 10 for each Oracle database on the system. To summarize:
SEMMNS = sum of PROCESSES setting for each database on the system
+ ( 2 * [largest PROCESSES setting])
+ (10 * [number of databases on system]
To determine the maximum number of semaphores that can be allocated on a Linux system, use the following calculation. It will be the lesser of:
SEMMNS -or- (SEMMSL * SEMMNI)
SEMOPM
The SEMOPM kernel parameter is used to control the number of semaphore operations that can be performed per semop system call.
The semop system call (function) provides the ability to do operations for multiple semaphores with one semop system call. A semaphore set can have the maximum number of SEMMSL semaphores per semaphore set and is therefore recommended to set SEMOPM equal to SEMMSL.
Oracle recommends setting the SEMOPM to a value of no less than 100.
App B could try using connection pooling or something to reduce the number of connections to the DB.

DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 0, timeout)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for