Max no of conversation 100 exceed

Hi all,
We are now in SAP R/3 version 4.70 running on Oracle 9.i with HPUX
11.23.Currently we are facing CPIC error that mention about the Error
max no of 100 conversation exceed.
I have read though all the SAP note as show below:
0000074141 Resource Management for tRFC and aRFC
0000314530 Number of RFC/CPIC connections for external clients
0000316877 Maximum number of conversation exceeded
0001054121 The SAP Ecosystem in a Nutshell
And since this RFC connection error is occurs at the jave level,it is the
responsibility of RFC caller to close the connection. A client program opens the connection for calling funtion module(s) and has to close this connection, as soon as this connection is in use any more.
So i would like to know the BAPI Function module so that i can initiate it from the the RFC caller.I hope if possible recommend me a way to terminate this RFC connection in Java.
hereby is the attached screenshot for the error.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/z3qn85
Message was edited by:
yeong kah fei

Hi,
ideally your application uses client pools. If so, then you have to make sure that after acquiring a client from the connection pool (<client>=JCO.getClient(<poolname)) and executing the RFC's for the given thread, you have to return the client to the pool (JCO.releaseClient(<client>)).
This should be sufficient when using client pools. If you have individual RFC connections not managed via a client pool, then you can close the connection once it's no longer used (jcoClient.disconnect()).
Hope this helps.
Best wishes, harald

Similar Messages

DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 0, timeout)

Hello,
In our CRM system EHP1 FOR CRM 7 ABAP ,users get this screen mainly for big contracts at different stages like collision run,saving.
Status before error started
I have already gone through notes 1757252
But the parameter rdisp/max_vm_priv_time and rdisp/max_vm_priv_no doesn't exist in our system. Instead is there any other parameter which we can use in our release ?
I could find these errors when the timeout screen occurred :
DEV_DISP
Wed Jul 23 15:26:08 2014
DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
Wed Jul 23 15:26:28 2014
DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
Wed Jul 23 15:26:46 2014
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24366
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24502
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24691
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
sm21:
Q0 G Request (type DIA) cannot be processed
work process trace
please check the image
Thanks
Shradha

Hello Divyanshu
It didnt create dev_vm.trc and VM_STACK_TRACE
And I am unable to provide dev_disp and dev_w* here due to size of the trace
But could the error be due to any of these parameters :
Parameters
Current
Changed
rdisp/max_vm_priv_time
2400
SERVLET=2400, RFC=2400
isp/max_vm_priv_no
3
SERVLET=3, RFC=3
rdisp/max_priv_time
600
3600
Maximum hold time for work processes in PRIV mode
rdisp/max_debug_lazy_time
600
3600
Maximum hold time for work processes in DEBUG mode
rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no
1000
1058
Buffer Size for CPI-C Communications
rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no
300
1058
Work Process Communication Blocks
vmcj/option/ps
960M
1460M
poolsize for the VMC
vmcj/option/gc/sharedWaterMark
90
70
VMC: watermark for shared garbage collector
vmcj/max_vm_heap_MB
64
128
max. vm heap
rdisp/keepalive
1200
3600
Timer for check of unused connections
rdisp/keepalive_timeout
60
150
Timeout for connection to SAPGUI
rdisp/wppriv_max_no
DEFAULT
16
Maximum number of work processes in PRIV mode

ERROR max no of cpic clients exceeded (2000)

Hi all,
We are the error max no. of CPIC clients exceeded (2000) when logging through ESS Portal
Please help me to resolve this soon.
Regards,
Kalyan

Hello Kalyan,
you will have Increase the value of the gw/max_sys parameter in the backend system
Refer to Notes 314530 and 894100 and you will be able to solve the issue
Let me know of any questions
Rohit

Max EAPOL-key M1 retransmissions exceeded for client

WISMS on ver 6.0.196
Receiving several hundred messages:
*Jul 06 16:51:58.943: %DOT1X-3-MAX_EAPOL_KEY_RETRANS: 1x_ptsm.c:407 Max EAPOL-key M1 retransmissions exceeded for client 00:19:88:05:2d:53
*Jul 06 16:51:57.792: %DOT1X-3-MAX_EAPOL_KEY_RETRANS: 1x_ptsm.c:407 Max EAPOL-key M5 retransmissions exceeded for client 00:40:9d:3a:c9:8f
*Jul 06 16:51:56.991: %DOT1X-3-MAX_EAPOL_KEY_RETRANS: 1x_ptsm.c:407 Max EAPOL-key M1 retransmissions exceeded for client 00:19:88:06:64:82
Any thoughts? Wireless users are experiencing random disconnects.

In looking at the radius configuration again I notice that we have two servers defined. I looked through the logs and didn't see anything alarming, until I checked the secondary radius server. I was just told that the second radius server has been shutdown without notice.
I will remove that from the WLAN config later tonight.
Obvious question, but will ask it anyway, will this cause these errors?

Maximum number of processes (100) exceeded

Hi!
I've some php application working with oracle XE with oci8 driver. Application works fine, but with time number of running oracle processes grows and when it reaches 100, it is impossible to to backup:
RMAN-00554: initialization of internal recovery manager package failed
RMAN-04005: error from target database:
ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (100) exceeded
To do a backup I need to restart oracle.
What is interesting, number of processes doesn't affect php application. I think php can reuse existing processes. It is possible that RMAN will reuse existing processes?
Or is there any way to close unneeded processes ?
best regards
Jarek

With 11g XE, use DRCP connection pooling for your PHP connections. See The Underground PHP and Oracle Manual
Use non-DRCP connections for other jobs.
It sounds like you are using persistent PHP connections. This is good for performance but if you have a large number of PHP/Apache processes you will reach the DB limits, as you've found. You can tune the number of connections to suit the largest possible number of mid-tier processes in your system. Do this with the 'processes' parameter in the DB. See the "Configuring the Database For Testing" section in the testing chapter of The Underground PHP and Oracle Manual. You could also reduce the number of Apache processes that start, or be more aggressive in expiring them.
For follow up PHP questions, use the PHP OTN forum.

Max Character File Size Limit exceeded.The document is too large to process

Hi
I have made set on section on products in report.
the Reports contains around 50 products when im opening the report
in draft mode the following error is displayed
"Max Character File Size Limit exceeded.The document is too large to be proceesed by the server .Contact your business Objects Administrator."
can some body help me out how to increase my report character file size

Hi,
If you are using Business Objects XIR2, there is a performance parameter in the Web_Intelligence Report Server where you can increase the size of that file. The parameter is Maximun Character File Size. Go to the CMC>Server>server.Web_IntelligenceReportServer in the Properties tab you will see it.
Cheers,
Luigi

Genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded

Hi .,
I am getting the following error in my console rapidly.
I am using Sun Sparc server running with Solaris 10 ., We start getting this error
suddently after a restart of the server and the error is continously rolling on the console...
The Error:
Rebooting with command: boot
Boot device: disk0 File and args:
SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_118822-25 64-bit
Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Hardware watchdog enabled
Failed to send email alert for recent event.
SC Alert: Failed to send email alert for recent event.
Hostname: nitwebsun01
NOTICE: VxVM vxdmp V-5-0-34 added disk array DISKS, datype = Disk
NOTICE: VxVM vxdmp V-5-3-1700 dmpnode 287/0x0 has migrated from enclosure FAKE_ENCLR_SNO to enclosure DISKS
checking ufs filesystems
/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s4: is logging.
/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s7: is logging.
nitwebsun01 console login: Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 439
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 414
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 413
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 414
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 413
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 414
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 413
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:41 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 1 time
Nov 20 14:56:43 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 470
Nov 20 14:56:43 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 467
Nov 20 14:56:44 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 470
Nov 20 14:56:44 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:44 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 1 time
Nov 20 14:56:49 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 503
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 510
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 519
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 516
Nov 20 14:56:50 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 519
Nov 20 14:56:53 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 540
Nov 20 14:56:53 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 2 times
Nov 20 14:56:53 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 549
Nov 20 14:56:53 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 4 times
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 665
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 6 times
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 667
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 2 times
Nov 20 14:56:56 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 121
Nov 20 14:56:57 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 868
Nov 20 14:56:57 nitwebsun01 /usr/lib/snmp/snmpdx: unable to get my IP address: gethostbyname(nitwebsun01) failed [h_errno: host not found(1)]
Nov 20 14:56:58 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 887
Nov 20 14:57:00 nitwebsun01 genunix: basic rctl process.max-file-descriptor (value 256) exceeded by process 976
nitwebsun01 console login: root
Nov 20 14:57:00 nitwebsun01 last message repeated 2 times
Here I attached my /etc/project file also..
[root@nitwebsun01 /]$ cat /etc/project
system:0::::
user.root:1::::
process.max-file-descriptor=(privileged,1024,deny);
process.max-sem-ops=(privileged,512,deny);
process.max-sem-nsems=(privileged,512,deny);
project.max-sem-ids=(privileged,1024,deny);
project.max-shm-ids=(privileged,1024,deny);
project.max-shm-memory=(privileged,4294967296,deny)
noproject:2::::
default:3::::
process.max-file-descriptor=(privileged,1024,deny);
process.max-sem-ops=(privileged,512,deny);
process.max-sem-nsems=(privileged,512,deny);
project.max-sem-ids=(privileged,1024,deny);
project.max-shm-ids=(privileged,1024,deny);
project.max-shm-memory=(privileged,4294967296,deny)
group.staff:10::::
[root@nitwebsun01 /]$
Help me to came out of this issue
Regards
Suseendran .A

This is an old post but I'm going to reply to it for future reference of others.
Please ignore the first reply to this thread... by default /etc/rctladm.conf doesn't exist, and you should never use it. Just put it out of your mind.
So, then... by default, a process can have no more than 256 file descriptors open at any given time. The likelyhood that you'll have a program using more than 256 files very low... but, each network socket counts as a file descriptor, therefore many network services will exceed this limit quickly. The 256 limit is stupid but it is a standard, and as such Solaris adheres to it. To look at the open file descriptors of a given process use "pfiles <pid>".
So, to change it you have several options:
1) You can tune the default threshold on the number of descriptors by specifying a new default threshold in /etc/system:
set rlim_fd_cur=1024
2) On the shell you can view your limit using 'ulimit -n' (use 'ulimit' to see all your limit thresholds). You can set it higher for this session by supplying a value, example: 'ulimit -n 1024', then start your program. You might also put this command in a startup script before starting your program.
3) The "right" way to do this is to use a Solaris RCTL (resource control) defined in /etc/project. Say you want to give the "oracle" user 8152 fd's... you can add the following to /etc/project:
user.oracle:101::::process.max-file-descriptor=(priv,8152,deny)
Now log out the Oracle user, then log back in and startup.
You can view the limit on a process like so:
prctl -n process.max-file-descriptor -i process <pid>
In that output, you may see 3 lines, one for "basic", one for "privileged" and one for "system". System is the max possible. Privileged is the limit by which you need to have special privs to raise. Basic is the limit that you as any user can increase yourself (such as using 'ulimit' as we did above). If you define a custom "priviliged" RCTL like we did above in /etc/projects it will dump the "basic" priv which is, by default, 256.
For reference, if you need to increase the threshold of a daemon that you can not restart, you can do this "hot" by using the 'prctl' program like so:
prctl -t basic -n process.max-file-descriptor -x -i process <PID>
The above just dumps the "basic" resource control (limit) from the running process. Do that, then check it a minute later with 'pfiles' to see that its now using more FD's.
Enjoy.
benr.

Available bandwindth and 'max-reserved bandwidth'

Is the max-reserved bandwidth only important when working with Qos classes and the bandwidth statement? Is the default 75% available bandwidth only used then?
In other words if I have a 100MB link with a service policy applied for Voice, Call-Control and video. After that I notice the available bandwidth on thie 100MB link is 61280 kilobits/sec.
If I put in a 'max-reserved bandwidth 95' would I reclaim another 20MB of bandwidth for the class-default? Would leaving 5% on the 100MB link for routing and other stuff be acceptable?
Here is the config and show commands:
class-map match-any Call-Control
match ip dscp cs3
match ip dscp af31
class-map match-any Video
match ip dscp af41
class-map match-any Voice
match ip dscp ef
policy-map QOS_classes_to_ACN
class Voice
priority 10000
class Call-Control
bandwidth 500
class Video
bandwidth 3220
class class-default
fair-queue
random-detect
interface FastEthernet6/0
description 100MB Link to ACN
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
ip route-cache flow
no ip mroute-cache
load-interval 30
duplex full
speed 100
service-policy output QOS_classes_to_ACN
ROC-RT7206-QMOE#sh int f6/0
FastEthernet6/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is i82543 (Livengood), address is 00b0.4a28.3ca8 (bia 00b0.4a28.3ca8)
Description: 100MB Link to ACN
Internet address is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 183/255, rxload 21/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:03, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:13:30
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 5211742
Queueing strategy: Class-based queueing
Output queue: 70/1000/64/5211742 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
Conversations 2/35/256 (active/max active/max total)
Reserved Conversations 2/2 (allocated/max allocated)
Available Bandwidth 61280 kilobits/sec <--- Available bandwidth
30 second input rate 8615000 bits/sec, 6860 packets/sec
30 second output rate 71788000 bits/sec, 7484 packets/sec
31692173 packets input, 4263195179 bytes
Received 1204 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
34536300 packets output, 2513155446 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Here is the output of show policy-pam int:
ROC-RT7206-QMOE#sh policy-map int f6/0
FastEthernet6/0
Service-policy output: QOS_classes_to_ACN
Class-map: Voice (match-any)
3417571 packets, 934178998 bytes
30 second offered rate 1722000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: ip dscp ef (46)
3417571 packets, 934178998 bytes
30 second rate 1722000 bps
Queueing
Strict Priority
Output Queue: Conversation 264
Bandwidth 10000 (kbps) Burst 250000 (Bytes)
(pkts matched/bytes matched) 1908656/521903140
(total drops/bytes drops) 0/0
Class-map: Call-Control (match-any)
615085 packets, 48926098 bytes
30 second offered rate 84000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
588857 packets, 47299978 bytes
30 second rate 81000 bps
Match: ip dscp af31 (26)
26228 packets, 1626120 bytes
30 second rate 2000 bps
Queueing
Output Queue: Conversation 265
Bandwidth 500 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
(pkts matched/bytes matched) 337953/26882724
(depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
Class-map: Video (match-any)
146136 packets, 82165408 bytes
30 second offered rate 90000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: ip dscp af41 (34)
146136 packets, 82165408 bytes
30 second rate 90000 bps
Queueing
Output Queue: Conversation 266
Bandwidth 3220 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
(pkts matched/bytes matched) 81687/45950190
(depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
35227089 packets, 47492000208 bytes
30 second offered rate 87718000 bps, drop rate 14714000 bps
Match: any
Queueing
Flow Based Fair Queueing
Maximum Number of Hashed Queues 256
(total queued/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/5171786/0
exponential weight: 9
class Transmitted Random drop Tail drop Minimum Maximum Mark
pkts/bytes pkts/bytes pkts/bytes thresh thresh prob
0 30181523/39910255774 1297726/1944176143 3893194/5836883998 20 40 1/10
1 0/0 0/0 0/0 22 40 1/10
2 0/0 0/0 0/0 24 40 1/10
3 0/0 0/0 0/0 26 40 1/10
4 0/0 0/0 0/0 28 40 1/10
5 0/0 0/0 0/0 30 40 1/10
6 1213/88749 0/0 0/0 32 40 1/10
7 0/0 0/0 0/0 34 40 1/10
rsvp 0/0 0/0 0/0 36 40 1/10

Max Beans in Cache causes NULL Pointer Exception

Hi All,
a rather weird event (from our perspective) occurs when we do the
following:
We have an entity bean set to max beans in cache 100 (default value of
our deployment tool ), the database table related to that bean holds
lets say 300 entries.
Doing a find all and in the same session bean instanciated transaction a
processing loop over the enumeration of beans we get an NULL Pointer
exception when accesing the 101 Bean. Neverthless the Weblogic server
increases the cache size automatically but obviously not fast enough and
not on time.
has anyone experienced the same problem and has a fix for it, appart
from increasing the cache size in the deployment descriptor ?
any help welcome
Michael

Hi Michael.
Can you post the stack trace of the NullPointerException? Was it in
your code or ours? Also, what version of WebLogic are you using?
-- Rob
Rob Woollen
Software Engineer
BEA WebLogic
[email protected]
Michael Rupprecht wrote:
Hi All,
a rather weird event (from our perspective) occurs when we do the
following:
We have an entity bean set to max beans in cache 100 (default value of
our deployment tool ), the database table related to that bean holds
lets say 300 entries.
Doing a find all and in the same session bean instanciated transaction a
processing loop over the enumeration of beans we get an NULL Pointer
exception when accesing the 101 Bean. Neverthless the Weblogic server
increases the cache size automatically but obviously not fast enough and
not on time.
has anyone experienced the same problem and has a fix for it, appart
from increasing the cache size in the deployment descriptor ?
any help welcome
Michael

The question about max line item in material document

Dear sir:
I want to excute CO27 for an FP . It will create material documents. The max line item is 100 in each material document. But I want to record 400 lines in a material document. Is it possbile to change the number of max line in material document? How could I do to change that ? Thanks !!

I know about 333 in case of physical inventory because the finacial document has a technical limitation of 3 digits for Fi document item number, which means the FI document cannot take more than 999 lines.
In case of physical inventory a material document item can create up to 3 FI item lines. So the limit for physical inventory became 333.
I dont know from where you have the 100 as limitation, but take the above said into consideration before you change anything.

Max number of Hits Account Identification

Hi all,
we are currently having the problem in IC that when somebody try to identify an account of an BP with more that 100 related sold to parties, that no account is displayed because of the standard max number of hits 100.
I have found the path to customize this in the SPRO but this sentence in the SAP help is making me some headache:
The higher the number you enter here, the more results the system will search for, and in turn, the more performance is affected. The maximum number of hits that the system allows is 100, which is also the default value.
I understand the point of the performance, but does this mean that the performance is also affected the account identification of the other BP with less than 100 related sold to parties?
Can anybody help in this issue?
We are working on CRM 5.0.
Regards
Abosi
Edited by: Abosi_3li2 on Feb 8, 2012 11:08 AM

Hello
The bug of nothing displayed if over 100 accounts are found is solved with [SAP note 1467929|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1467929.]
The code you are referring to is:
IF bpident_profile-max_hits IS INITIAL.
max_hits = 100.
ELSE.
max_hits = bpident_profile-max_hits.
ENDIF.
It means that, if blank, 100 hits is considered. You can modify the customizing up to 255 results since that is the limit of accounts to be found.
Regards
Joaquin

The reporting service web service connection pool reached the max pool size

I got a problem that it throw an exception "The timeout peroid elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connection was in use and max pool size was reached."
The satuation is our service use 15 thread to render report, but sometimes we met such exception I list above. I didn't change any configuration in rsreportserver.config, and it seems the connection to reportserver database from reporting service web
service was not disposed.
Is there any configuration I can modify to fix this issue?

Hi Dexter,
In your case, we can try to increasing the size of the connection pool to resolve the issue. By default, the Max Pool Size is 100. You can refer to the similar issue below:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c57c0432-c27b-45ab-81ca-b2df76c911ef/timeout-expired-the-timeout-period-elapsed-prior-to-obtaining-a-connection-from-the-pool?forum=adodotnetdataproviders
Since the issue is related with ADO.NET. I suggestion you post the question in the following forum:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=adodotnetdataproviders
It is appropriate and more experts will assist you.
Regards,
Alisa Tang
Alisa Tang
TechNet Community Support

Max no of cursors opened

Hi all,
For our project we are using Oracle8i as back-end. I am using JDBC api to manipulate the data in the oracle database.
I am getting an error saying that "Max no of cursors opened exceeds limit". This error am freq getting. It causes the table locking.
Is this happening becuase of ResultSet is not closing?
Will ResultSet automatically closed if I close the statment object in finally block of my code or do I need to close the ResultSet explicitly.
Is there any solution for this. This am getting if no of clients are concurantly update the same table.
Any suggestions and solutions appreciated.
thanks in advance
ANILA

It's been asked here before, but I'm embarrassed to confess that I still don't know the answer:
What if you're using a connection pool? My understanding of pools is that they create a pool of live, open connections that an application can draw from. The cost of opening connections is paid once and amortized over all the requests made.
That makes me think that I should leave connections open.
When I do database access with Tomcat, I set up a JNDI connection pool. I have my apps close every ResultSet and Statement, but I don't close the connections. I leave them open to be put back in the pool for the next request to use.
Is this correct? - MOD

ITunes Maxing CPU when next song plays

I installed the latest update of iTunes 7. Since then, while playing songs, iTunes fluxuates from 30% CPU to 65% with it occasionally maxing the CPU to 100% when a new song starts. The music sounds all garbled for about a second or two and locks up my whole machine. Then iTunes CPU drops back to in between 30% and 65% and the song plays fine. This did not happen with the initial release of version 7. Only after the first update was installed. If I pause the songs, the CPU drops down to below 20%. This also happens if iTunes is the only program I have running, just not as often. Any suggestions on how to fix this would be greatly appreciated. My laptop has a Intel Pentium M processor 1.60 GHz with 1 GB of RAM.

Sorry for my english ...
I have the same problem too. But I also saw that this appears when at every 10 seconds iTunes alternate/scrowling the artist name and the album name. In full screen, the cpu goes to 70%; in a small window, "only" 35%. When iconified, there is no problem. When it appens at the same time of a new music the sound is ****** for two seconds.
This problem don't appears in the version 6.
How to tell that to apple ?? This must be corrected !
Thanks !

Prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -i process $$

Hi all,
when i execute the following command "prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -i process $$"
its output is
NAME PRIVILEGE VALUE FLAG ACTION RECIPIENT
project.max-shm-memory
privileged 5.85TB - deny
5.85TB while RAM is only 32GB.
How i can change it for oracle user.

What does your /etc/project file says?
Mine is (showing oracle user):
oracle:100::oracle::process.max-sem-nsems=(priv,300,deny);project.max-sem-ids=(priv,100,deny);project.max-shm-ids=(priv,512,deny);project.max-shm-memory=(priv,8589934592,deny)
That is 8 GB RAM allowed for oracle use (max-shm-memory).
Change it using
projmod -sK "project.max-shm-memory=(priv,8G,deny)" oracleJan

Max no of conversation 100 exceed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for